Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSilver Sage Guest Ranch_36000060044000_Memos,Correspondences, File Notes_\ \ ^iLvetiProposal:CLUSTER DEVELOPMENTS l/f fV^/Al-l^g^3Lake Name: g - /‘i?Lake Number: REVIEW BY L&R; ProposedHealth Dept. (License) Land & Resource1. DWELLING UNITS (CUP) i oResidence(s) Rental Cabin(s) Manufactured Home(s) Recreational Camp Site(s) TOTAL DWELLING UNITS s V. 0 I) ProposedExistingAllowable2. DENSITY CALCULATION 3 IA. Water Frontage B. Area (Tier) Riparian Second 11 LlJ a olO 0^O oNi^Third nfrFourth ///%h;/4Fifth IIDTOTAL DENSITY 9cP must include Shore Impact Zone)cufi OA fi OtsfiT PrtG.~s ^ % (minimum requirement 50% S ^ This is ^ />J£uj Pt?,oA6Si^L •= fkizrs oF II pflo/^OSCi:} C/^n^PSjr€S « REVIEW BY PLANNING COMMISSION; C^rriP^i reS , 3. OPEN SPACE \%SUl^0 . 1. COMPATIBILITY: Is the proposed use compatible with adjacent land uses and SMO requirements, such as vegetative screening, setback(s), buffer zone(s), structure height, land height, sensitive areas, etc.? 2. EFFECTS ON ENVIRONMENT: What effect will the proposed use have on the environment (topography, vegetation, noise, traffic and etc.)? 3. HAZARDS: Will this proposed use result in the creation of any hazards for area residents? 4. PARKING: Are there 2 off street parking spaces per dwelling unit? 5. SHORE RECREATION FACILITIES: Are the onsite shore recreation facilities (swimming area(s), dock(s)/mooring site(s), launching ramp(s) and etc.) centralized? 6. PUBLIC ROAD ACCESS: Is there adequate access from a public road? 7. IDENTIFIABLE ADVANTAGES: Are there identifiable advantages of the proposal? 8. IDENTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGES: Are there identifiable disadvantages of the proposal? J REVIEW BY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; 1. DOCUMENTS CREATING COMMON OWNERSHIP •r ' JVWL Ft^ot^n<SC (^ (nsflsudco i<£fi j Quj&l\~\^<^ . I170 •). I ■:i-I110 T 5^ ’ O' C/iL Cu l^Ti^^rO ■ ' Tieiz. i) 133, FT^ :~/i.S7'f2in K" I, S' 3/ C IT'S- 30 ■‘S «Lnyir OsO^D^O ^i^JurJhTJ -=■ r fO . ocrs ^ V.'(o ! ^1 Q 11 e lip Ur^lTS i i) /SD^r- A /v.s' - ^.IT ^ ie> i^,^,TS */2>60 Fl Ut^>~ 'Ip ,T u/Jirs" Y : T(t^O I \€li ft) ^2yQ0^FT^^ 'PiO^ooofi ^fui\/ir -I, TT W/v 11 ^ i,e-9^I i 5T Units X s)C> Oy ^OO -/=^'l I, S' I u/u,rs X ^ liOjOoo FT^/c /,r 6//V' < / 2, 27 ^ ■ // P^iMS0t> Cfln«-Tes X =■ ‘HOD FT* ■i:^ /=T ^ - l^oo f=T^ ■ : 1,70c 7coo PT ^ 700 FT ^ li,^HO0FT ^ , i?, f/6 Y- too - ^ ^7"7o /fiZofios^o , PA.ofio3£p <r FiZ£.A io X <; I I X /^5 ^ Pfio pajuo CH&Ti Tzjilcts !q X/d) X J :■ rr^r C7,oo^ft:^ - ' IFF ^ 3. Proposal:SILVER SAGE QUEST RANCHCLUSTER DEVELOPMENTS Unn£unedLake Name: 56-147Lake Number: REVIEW BY L&R: ProposedHealth Dept. (License) Land & Resource1. DWELLING UNITS (CUP) 0Residence(s) Rental Cabin(s) Manufactured Home(s) Recreational Camp Site(s) TOTAL DWELLING UNITS ** 0 0 11 11 ProposedExistingAllowable2. DENSITY CALCULATION 11031Water Frontage Area (Tier) Riparian Second A. B. 11**010 2***02 0 NAThirdNA 0 NAFourthNA 0Fifth NANA 11012TOTAL DENSITY 92% (minimum requirement 50% & must include Shore Impact Zone)3. OPEN SPACE * This is a new proposal/neither a CUP or a Health Dept. Lie. have been issued ** Parts of all 11 proposed campsites. ***Parts of 2 proposed campsites. REVIEW BY PLAMNIWQ COMMISSION; Is the proposed use compatible with adjacent land uses an requirements, such as vegetative screening, setback(s), buffer zone(s), struc height, land height, sensitive areas, etc.? 1.COMPATIBILITY: What effect will the proposed use have on the environ (topography, vegetation, noise, traffic and etc.)? 2.EFFECTS ON ENVIRONMENT: Will this proposed use result in the creation of any hazards for3.HAZARDS: residents? PARKING: Are there 2 off street parking spaces per dwelling unit?4. SHORE RECREATION FACILITIES: Are the onsite shore recreation facilities (swimmi area(s), dock(s)/mooring site(s), launching ramp(s) and etc.) centralized? 5. PUBLIC ROAD ACCESS: Is there adec[uate access from a public road?6. IDENTIFIABLE ADVANTAGES: Are there identifiable advantages of the proposal?7. IDENTIFIABLE DISADVANTAGES: Are there identifiable disadvantages of the proposa8. REVIEW BY COtmTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE: 1. DOCUMENTS CREATING COMMON OWNERSHIP I ["’iV?: Ill ■ *11 6127624 111NYBERG SURVEYING INC. : i t SZJFl\/^JE'5r JCJSTG ^ JTNG _ 316 N. Nokomis Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 ) . Michael H. Nybergj li.ki5*511 t • • '-<! iU\ '/■ ■ 'E phOA* (320) 7i2-4lll TAX (320) 762^112 i:>^DATE:■ ,r >. .. f ^Tlz\FAXTO: Matk |■■■^ m 1 . FAX #(320) 762-4112HIKE NYBERGFROM: COMMENTS: Ai^c:i' I__tL mf.. I 'liM t (9)1OF Tile:)i^r 2> ^ ?• ?eo P-o^f: b Ye 7g t> f \ j e^TL^o . o fI,i ■ •'E-UcT^n^/r^h ■ ’•r -^1 li:-z,TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE:■i; J iiy! f X-!iIf you do not receive legible copies, please call (320) 762-4lllt as soon as possible.'^! j,h .^ MHaI aTRANSMITTED BY: !1. ■.: I :: fim ■': '"iim■i il " li^^CEIVED ^UN 2o ‘^'®«®0UBCE ■*. ^!li ■ m ■X'm^995 II r m P . 0 16127624111NYBERG SURVEYING INC. / '1'i)!pNYBJSnG JC1SK3 , JTJSrc: ^ 316 W. Nokomis Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 pi1 i. Michael U. Nyber^,i ; phoaa (320) 762-MXl FAX (320) 762-4122 Pi?'i.iS!i DATE:lii'm1. 2m.FAX #TO: ■i 1 ;FAX #(320) 762-411:MIKE NYBERGFROM: i COMMENTS:11Ncrx: ArC or- .' 1.5H iiT- zei/ui-H.^ ________________ I :■■ i ;i ;j v/rm ■• I.J.'ijii., |:i?« ■i , ■| ■ - (% fo I'lp|l 7 i IP?i 5® r'l::':; i ?iTOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE:. ':rs \If you do not receive legible copies, please call (320) 762-4111 as soon as possible. , I’:-!!;' •I r.is'S l.vi;!r:i:1TRANSMITTED BY:!;«Ill , i,"»! AUG 1 4 jgg^':i ^ W .4^ ' I is i I 1 P. 03NYBERG SURVEYING INC.S 1 27S241 1 1 " si- i’m ^ 'i,.- ■ . J . ■•*’-'■ \ \ ' \.z. '-jW { * •'.•i'?3 I■iI5; ■II II iI 'S<S III;c^itiii Wt m.i'f.i■7t'i1 llsi lat'!; i:1II'is! ;i!’ 6^!« mi!!? i ii!isii!:;lii I 'IS'ffi !|!3I;s;?! I?' ;:ii NYBERG SURVEYING INC.612T624111 : II. j ■ . m ■ jl:; 111 I IrS P. 02 SXX.VER SAOE OXJEST RANOM I> - XJ - D - CALCULA.TX01MS I ''‘■r . ■-PXER X f ■133,478 S.F. ■ -i-'i = :■0 ■■■^ m 133,478 S.F. (usable) /20.00b S.F./Lot 6.67 X 1.5 = 10 Units is 2 IS’I'i I, !62,009 -0 62,009 S.F. (usable) v; .. - /senses S.F. /Lot,3-rt'X,2<0 = x^^units . . ?'S;5! I l-i' 1 ■ i >,iia .31,5:Total J©'Units (11 proposed) \% !IMIP'EEV'XOXrS AREA I Impervious %Tent Sites (Swr.)TJLejc Total Area (S.F.) ■;:j tfi I, 2.7% 1.4% . 3600 850(and toilets) 1 133,478 62,0092 ii: H■Ifl 2.3%195,487 4450 i ^ ■■ i i. }li I I ii I'- sii i. if -SVl : S;. s'lli ^ '.if .j r