Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRose Shores Campground_32000080057002_Memos,Correspondences, File Notes_OTTER TAIL COUNTY LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION WWW.CO.OTTER-TAIL.MN.USOTTER TflUe^tarr-piaAfioia GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR AVENUE FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-998-8095 FAX: 218-998-8112 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PRE-APPLICATION MEETING CHECKLIST September 19, 2016 R.PSciPUD Name: Lake Number: 2toD Sec. “S' Twp. /3 7 ______ Lake Name: __ Rge. Twp Name:HDSA/CT Property Owner: Who Attended: Discussion: (Sec. IV. 11.) Type ___ Residential ^/commercial C-UST>^G ___ Resort Conversion □ Open Space 50% Total □ Impervious Surface ____ 25% Maximum for Total Impervious Surface ____ 20% Maximum for Buildings ____ 260 ft^ Maximum in Shore Impact Zone (SIZ) Owners Association Presentation Requirements See Section _ Scale Drawing /(^rof^ional Drawing \/^ Tier Location Tier Area Declaration (Bylaws) Density Calculation ____ Residential yA' Commercial C0\iCJS^SP LAST fl& C iMT Planned Unit Development (PUD) Pre-Application Meeting Checklist; Page 2^eT^uffer Zone (Lot Line) Road Private LAtJO f/A \ ____ Public ^ □ Parking Areas Must Be Identified □ Structure Setbacks ________ Last____ standard ____ Maximum Density ____ Increased Lake Setback ____ Vegetative Screening l^d^entralized Sewage Treatment System (Verified by MN Licensed Sewage System Designer) ^ZT^entralized Shore Recreation Facilities Dock(s) ^ £>f SUPS Swimming Areafsl JZ) ^ £>f Ur n^A) □ Reduced Visibility (Structures, Parking Area, & Other Facilities) t-er^CU’s (Commercial PUDs Only) Current License Open Deck (200 Ft^ Max.) _udf" Storage Structure (20 Ft^ Max. & 6 Ft Max. Height) Ua'^C Considerations (Sec. V. 3.1.) 1^^ Compatibility Environmental impact 1/^ Hazards Density / Location c/d* Land Suitability Near Shore Depth Sensitive Areas Parking / Traffic id" Hours Lighting Signage Time Frame / Phasing ____ Existing ____ Dedicated to Project Lot Area & Water Frontage Topographical Alteration Any other possible adverse effects cX 7 ____ Noise jja'^rovided copy of SMO ^ Signa^re H^/t 7 PC: Ranned Unit Oev^opment Pre-Application Checklist September 19, 2016 T AiV €AW.ML/!Vg}^/^ -IllmMig ^ty^CtLSX)/^ (f - HS iM^.iJfi’BJS WAT TMS'M J.a AliJj: Mif/S t f _______ Ot4 mJk 1 C if £0 y?/,^r\k / 17y,J ^ teiv\li^ Ai._____ i^x /^- ________^ f G?I7 r'nf^ ,_________________________^_____ ^ OlS€i^^SdA / ^^Ui" M i /k^<^ALy .^ LA TW4^/ ftltJk HH£fii>LSCIj7~) . / iM W/4/^ & 1^2_____________________________ItlLMMt yy)^'Aim^m..- ■ Om^t'N. ■.riM I /i:L_£IV A A__.X a3 ^ /___7'gT?^L 'f f- gk’ajgcr TP ;g^o ■S?£ ___t&e.kajij,.^^A^£K&Mu/d Ay>Xji«.w>n lillShJMLt dBJSl^ ,' I Oi»>gtuVf Wn'** _ t.v /’eMi I r raa nf / / ^%<jMLUiJe mst f d j* ^nUi pe>T£i^Ti4a,-/ ^0^£ 4»\"? fiiA (:4T^ I CS£3___'I QiS CSS H .^^1a/t ec3■;ii ‘?^r X c^ a u^E rx>k t^f^tr riPM 44gyl ^E& ^<ji Ad.r s^J <^E i ^ Ra^£ PEt^^sTl C'A-lJLulAT}ii?J __________________FusaA,8^£t FLfigfO. ^KEA Ifi^)MA .a I 1,^44 ^5© A HM ^/41 Planning Commission June 19, 1996 Page 4 A Conditional Use Application to recjuest the addition of 17 new sites (to our existing 15 sites) on the second level of our property plus the approval of site 16 on the first level which was installed before we purchased the campground. We would also like to replace the existing driveway to 10' from the top of the bank. We would probably also need another bathhouse to accommodate the new sites. The property is described as Pt of Government Lot 9 of Section 8 of Hobart Township; Rose Lake (56-360), RO. DeAnn & Daniel Vukelich, owners and Charles Krekelberg, Attorney represented the Application. A motion by Trites, second by Olson to approve the Application for a total of 25 dwelling units (this allows an additional 9 units onsite) subject to the following: 1) The Applicant secures a Variance from the Board of Adjustment to exceed the density requirement. 2) Storm Water Management Plans to be addressed by the Land & Resource Management Office. 3) The Otter Tail County Highway Engineer is to address the access to County Hwy.#4. 4) The Purchase Agreement for the six acre tract is completed as proposed and attached to existing parcel. The 25 dwelling units were arrived at as follows: The Commission determined that the entire 600' of water frontage should be used to determine the allowable number of dwelling units based upon water frontage. Therefore, 600' divided by 50' per dwelling unit > 12 units 12 -«■ 18 units (allowable for existing water frontage) > 30 units 30 -K 19 units (allowable per area - both existing and proposed purchase) » 49 units 49 units divided by 2 (average) > 24.5 approximately 25 units Voting: All members in favor except Bergerud, Barker and Zimmerman. Department of LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL Phone:(218) 739-2271 Court House FERGUS FALLS. MINNESOTA 56537 April 20, 1995 OeAnn Vukelich Rose Shores Campground R#3 Box 584 Frazee MN 56544 RE: Proposed Resort Expansion, Rose Lake (56-360) Dear Ms. Vukelich: As we discussed during our telephone conversation of April 17, 1995, the potential meocimum dwelling unit density a resort may have is based upon its water frontage and the total area. In this case, the f ront. footage was given as 1008 feet and the area was calculated (from your scale drawing) to be 9.48 acres. Using these figures, the following potential density was calculated to be 20 dwelling units based upon water frontage and 12 dwelling units based upon total area, density. In this case, the area requirement would be the limiting I have seen cases where the Planning Commission has averaged.the two numbers (water frontage and area) to arrive at the permitted density. If this was done, the average would be 16 dwelling units which is the number of dwelling units currently permitted onsite. Based upon these calculations (copy enclosed) and the past history of this resort (see enclosed copies of previous Conditional Use Permit Applications)., it does not appear likely that the Planning Commission would recommend approval of your expansion plans. Since this is the case, I am returning your Conditional Use Permit Application, your Application Fee (check #6812 for $75.00) and your scaled drawing. Should you decide you wish to proceed with your plans, you will need to resubmit your Application, the Application Fee and a registered surveyor's drawing of your proposal. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact pur office. Sincerely, Bill Kalar Administrator mgb Planning Commission April 2, 1997 Page 4 Kurt Maethner et al, "Maet-Boh Development" - Motion Withdrawn/Tabled: A Preliminary Plat of "Maet-Boh Development" consisting of 6 Commercial Industrial Lots, 1 Block. The property is described as Pt SI/2 NWl/4 of Section 4, Clitherall Township. Kurt Maethner and Terry Anderson (Surveyor) represented the Application. Bert Olson - Indicated that he would abstain on this Application. Motion / Withdrawn: A motion by Johnson, second by Estes to approve as presented subject to: 1. An adequate Title Opinion being provided (Wally Senyk indicated that the current Title Opinion has the following problems: A. It is nearly 2 years old (4-17-95). B. It is not in the format required by the Subdivision Controls Ordinance. C. The legal description in the Title Opinion does not match the legal description of the proposed plat. D. The developers are not the title owners (at least as of 4-95) & so do not have interest sufficient to dedicate the road right-of-way). 2. Approval from MN DOT regarding the approaches is obtained. 3. An easement being obtained for the Ely approach. The Commission discussed the identified problems. Motion: A motion by Trites, second by Bergerud to table the Preliminary Plat to May 7, 1997 to allow time for the following to be provided: 1. Valid evidence of an easement for access on the Ely approach. 2. Written approval from MN DOT for the approaches. 3. An adequate Title Opinion addressing the following problems with the current Title Opinion which are as follows: A. It is nearly 2 years old (4- 1 7-95). B. It is not in the format required by the Subdivision Controls Ordinance. C. The legal description in the Title Opinion does not match the legal description of the proposed plat. D. The developers are not the title owners (at least as of 4-95) & so do not have interest sufficient to dedicate the road right-of-way). Voting: All members in favor, except Olson abstained. Break: The Commission took a break from 8:25 - 8:40. Rose Shores Campground - Accepted Remedy: Chuck Krekelberg represented Rose Shores Campground in reference to a Conditional Use Application that was approved by the Planning Commission 6-19- 96. He indicated that in the approval for the campsites, the parcel in which they were to be located were to be permanently attached to the existing resort, but that per the County Auditor's Office, these parcels can not be attached (reason being that they are being purchased on a Contract For Deed and the Fee Holders are different, therefore not being able to be combined). Mr. Krekelberg discussed some Planning Commission April 2, 1997 Page 5 possible wording that they would propose the Commission accept in leau of the combination of the lots. Motion: A motion by Trites, second Olson to accept the remedy proposed subject to review and approval of the County Attorney's Office. Voting: All members in favor. Shoreland Management Ordinance Revision - Referred By County Board To PC: Bill Kalar indicated to the Commission that on March 25, 1 997, the County Board referred the proposed revisions (specifically items #23 & #26) back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration; the County Board will consider the proposed revisions to the Shoreland Management Ordinance and the Subdivision Controls Ordinance on April 8, 1 997 at 1:30 P.M. A copy of the minutes (attached) pertaining to this reconsideration was handed out to the Commission members. Discussion Regarding Item #23 As Proposed: "RCUs In A Cluster Development Must Be Currently Licensed And No Appurtenant Structures Are Allowed" Judd Young (Maple Lane Resort/East Battle Lake) expressed concerns regarding obtaining new clients/future business and that the proposal to not allow decks is a safety issue; also that storage sheds should be allowed, maybe the County could place a size restriction on sheds. He indicated that QTC needs the income and business from resorts. Dan Vukelich (Rose Shores Campground/Rose Lake) agreed with Mr. Judd and also indicated that he sees a need for sheds (it's scary to see gas tanks stored under campers). Stephanie Frahm (Swan Lake Resort/ Swan Lake) expressed that handicap accessibility needs to be addressed and also sees a need for small sheds (the ones at our resort are not cluttered looking). Dennis Frahm (Swan Lake Resort/Swan Lake) indicated that it is not their intent to turn the campers into houses, but that campsite resorters need to make a living. Mike Cummings (Golden Eagle Campground/Big Pine Lake) expressed that in allowing storage sheds the County would take on quite a task and indicated that there is room for storage under Fifth Wheel RVs. Motion: A motion by Trites, second by Estes to amend #23 to include "except open, not enclosed decks and storage buildings not to exceed 20 square feet in size with a maximum height of 6'. Voting: All members in favor. mR.26. 1997 3:14PM P2 PHONE NO. : 218 334 6360FROM : Northarvest Bean COVENANT This Covenant is made this ___ day of and between Daniel A. VuKelich and DeAnn E. Vukelich, husband and wife. , 1997 by WHEREAS^ Daniel A. Vukelich and DeAnn E. Vukelich are the purchasers of real estate located in Otter Tail County described on Exhibit A pursuant to Contract for Deed dated February 28, 1997 and filed for the record in the Office of the Otter Tail County Recorder, Otter Tail County, Minnesota on March 5, 1997 as Document No. 054622. WHEREAS, Daniel A. Vukelich and DeAnn E. Vukelich, husband and wife, are also' the owners of real estate located in otter Tail County, Minnesota described on Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, Daniel A. Vukelich and DeAnn E. Vukelich operate a recreational park on real estate described on Exhibit B; and, have applied for and obtained a conditional use permit and a variance to expand said recreational park on conditions, one of which is the real estate described on Exhibit A be attached to real estate described on Exhibit Now, therefore, Daniel A. vukelich and DeAnn E. Vukelich do hereby covenant and agree so long as they operate a recreational park under the conditional use permit dated ___________ allowing expansion of the recreational park, that the real estate described on Exhibit A shall be attached to the real estate described on Exhibit B and may not be transferred, conveyed or severed from the real estate described on Exhibit B. , and thevariance dated Dated:Daniel A. Vukelich Dated; DeAnn E. Vukelich STATE or MINNESOTA ) )SS COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ , 1997 by Daniel A. Vukelich and DeAnn K.day of Vukelich, husband and wife. i f fI —:------'TT' SURVEYORS DRAWING ROSE LAKE CAMPGROUND IN SECTION 8-157-^0 OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA ; ! ;i .'a . i05■;V f 1 3: V 1 ^ f □ i AN A(0 FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE CAMPGROUND EXPANSION PURPOSES. ?-■ i-'.'■j /' SURVEY,ORt •:SCALE I INCH . 100 FEETV Roy A. Sinlh and Associates Lincoln ProfeMsional Centerf26.2 => DENOTES SPOT ELEV. OF 26.2'.1 ‘Detroit Lakes, Minnesota*(ASSUMED DATUM) 1 CBftify tbst this Burvoy, piBnf repf’f* prepared by me or under ;;i djrfr' ^nw^reiori and mpt ? 0m a du r■; 'i Land &rrveyor urtderthe. iO graphic 100 scale 200 . :-vt(d' :hH,SiMs ■r •4i OaleNo.../!\i wb:- TSo3,1' & file memo & 3P. OODPARCEL # (jAKE)0R RIVER NAME & NO. ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ (M.^/3 j^'S'Date L&R Official Action/Comments ,x>vXy" C ^ -€.iL:DZ:^ - -3 r J5gt*A -»«-»/^ /aO ^-('jCt^^4m/ L&R OfficialDate Action / Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate. Action/Comments. ; \ ,.r-^ ^ H1*^, i^frhffiP )C?0^ <ta (Lt<^>' a'A T)/:^-,i^\L{<H^obo fT ^qO \j^ (3^<»'y = H^^6b0FT^ ~ n ^/Ur^U - O .(c>\'^ V»V»)T i2 (^/>)Utr)(?L(»?/^ ' VcfP ^, L lb u»^)r I , ^AS” \ -3WO T■/l^^^ 1 \/;i. ( ^$o')(ss^o') - Ifl^p^orr^ )^')^aOo fT^ - = iS’^^Ooo FT^ I2y^ cexi/=r ^ 4 ~ I U*^/Ti ^ (/*h4L7}fiL)€<i) *r’- 3.V5' ^^ ui^iiS 1st Tjeti - ^/3 HI 3 FT^ - ^S4,jOcafr^ . I 11 ^ ^fCFT'^ T 066 'y, Vi ^^^/lTi - nij^$6 rr^XQ.lL^9.t..Jr£S!M. __ TT rm__4,^:.6.L FT> fuu,T -«‘V'd /v Z.^" (m\4L7\Pi,£tC)c,, i/'^'trPjft*’s- 1\//•r //7 4rv/TSi>/X //I/T07>^Lii X//1st 7T ?I! ;/ / /f i/2i> /^ /008' -5)If- Rose j iT^ loo/r I jOO'% FT jaols FT ^ So FT /\ArjT rr <c Uf^iTSj<2<^ . ^ /iR£i} tf ^ 10 FT 1_..... 1^1 nFii S', / ^S u^)ts. 7, 4 7 /-:; i\0 ^006 fT'^l]i^>T TFT^a 26 5,^^^ g, iJi$ Mf^'rs X s'•e. ■ ■>. - ^ cjf^ti 5 -V,' ,.5'-A-;2n/y Vim ~ FT^/v*'it z ^ (^ji.7irK)t^ T 3 , <s ■% I.LI^<^0 rr^ I . LU yi^T^ A /A?•KSt.“',.\J CO ^ -. ..-^3 tjrJ) T3■ :\v • >.> K /**,k - • Jfc^*-. .tW'i'- .;*"s,». I I ff * It.I ♦t 0 ■ ■ y l^w^k.. jOl>-«■ \ Qfn»^ jio*sC V.z'“v- L. *^'-3 Tja<■:.. F-i iSi y_Wit.J<f. Ur^T- —' ■ ■, ■*x • V.O. 42? /~ ‘^0^O<S^ FtYu/^iT ~. ' ■!!?■2y^, /5-6 i^r ^ <9 • 4i>/ iJi^tr 7^ 2 ” '...■.i ^ f «s~:£<*• ■ '■■ '“>,^-;S. - v:- -v..^ ~ViV ,. ■"'■!" ■■'^■""■V" .yfe’:-T"^'“-‘- ■ - ■ '' ^'^.’'V' ■f -- ■'.V''tf /.-?.-*■■: -V ' --"41- • : VSS^:?5i¥'a^'S' - *;’^- v'- '■■'’’■ „--■ • ' ^v-■■' .''F' ' ■ V' ^ " ;V ■ Fr . V- -■S’; V- ■ .■■ ' ■' -'Vf . . '^^•^>--. ■-<'3; I- ■■ ^ ^ '‘ <-^- ..s • 17;^'’^-:*. .".-.:- ■,' .-;7 “ iV-i'F.<I U'^iT'V.-—.-*' * •.' ■.*' //:’i. xt/-7, unfirST^-nL/00 s'UT -s ir ^ 3fe>^e (Lfticc (^£)} 4- 3/?X?■*> /A t/A//r5 TSO-ii- II