The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPeterson Pelican Lake HOL_17000991130000_Memos,Correspondences, File Notes_[jcvld dhi's \ai €plf-ti/<h JL Parc.eJC. fiS fkcvsyi ikx hl^lPL ilhJL - d U)PS acy is not guaranteed. NOT to be construed or used as a legal description. ^ i ADDITION c/1-hP ^ me -fi^s«fec{ti«-l Lets - >■ 2. U)h ' ‘^re Uf-^>" cc^a r c Ai »■ .1bC'S' ROW - ■■ ■■■*?■• tl'®.''®'?'' . :■;(&!I? (i) bmM ‘I'lresi<jertc^ on e<3iich <5-f iV z [Wcel5 a r , 17000170232000;U>I Il60JkTUTTWc» 17000991727000 .'17M4' 'guaranteed. For REFERENCE purposes only. THIS IS NOTA LEGAL DOCUMENT Tue Nov 12 2013 05:2 i ^ ga; /cl 1 r<j$, S^h'cS, Wt.UCA^(Xppro)C. cAh'c%o. Marsha Bowman From: Sent: Marsha Bowman Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:23 AM 'Bruce Zeller' RE: Pelican Lake Parcels - Inwwod Beach Resort, Fish Lake (56-768) To: Subject: Sounds good! Marsha Manho'Bowmcvyv Office' A dmlnCitratcn' Lcvnd'dr Keiourc€'Kiaeiage*ne^ QSC, 540 W Br MN 56537 218-998-8099 HOTTER mil covart - Miaaiiori From: Bruce Zeller [mailto:bruce@lakeplace.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 1:26 PM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Re: Pelican Lake Parcels - Inwwod Beach Resort, Fish Lake (56-768) I provided you with the 5 parcels yesterday and indicated which 2 parcels the potential buyer wanted. That part is pretty cut and dry. It doesn't sound like splitting a cluster is promising. The property has 3 seperate addresses and 5 seperate parcels. The property with the addresses have cabins or mobile homes on them and each sits on the parcel for that address. The only thing I am uncertain on is the septic systems because there is just enough snow out there to cover the ground I'm not sure where they are at. It doesn't sound promising. I'll let my buyer know and if he wants to pursue it any further. Bruce On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Marsha Bowman <MBowman(2z),co.ottertail.mn.us> wrote: The explanation you provided does not allow me to determine if the splitting of the 5 parcels of Inwood Beach Resort meets the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. In order to properly review your proposal, please provide me with a drawing that identifies the existing structures, septic systems and their locations on each parcel. It appears you are proposing to create 2 parcels from the 5, therefore, you also need to be specific as to which parcels would be attached. As I indicated, a cluster development (resort) is complicated and detailed information is required when changes are being proposed. If you have any questions, please contact me. Marsha Hanho'Bowmccn' 1 office' A d^nirUityoixyr Lcvnd/£r Kejouf'ce^Mano^^ement aSC, 5W W fir fergccy faHy, MW 56537 218-998-8099 OTTER TRIl oo«ATT ■ ■laaiiOT* From: Bruce Zeller rmailto:bruce(5)lakeDlace.com1 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 12:17 PM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Re: Pelican Lake Parcels - Inwwod Beach Resort, Fish Lake (56-768) The parcel with the lake frontage has a double wide on it and a 1950 teardown house/cabin. The buyer would use the current double wide as a cabin that is on the parcel with the lake frontage and he'd like to build a garage on the "backlot" parcel. That would not have running water, just storage. The only construction would be a new garage on the backlot and possibly tearing down that 1950 cabin because it has no value whatsoever. With the snow cover I'm not sure where the current septic is but Land and Resource should have that information on the septic system and the location. Bruce On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Marsha Bowman <MBowman@co.ottertail.mn.us> wrote: Bruce, I have reviewed our file (Inwood Beach Resort) for the parcel numbers you referenced and determined that this is currently considered a “cluster development” (resort). This being the case, our Office considers these lots as “1” parcel containing multiple dwellings. 2 otter Tail County, Minnesota Accuracy is not guaranteed. NOT to be construed or used as a legal description. »s A ■ I * I H II n 1 iIg5O Iftu 8aIa8 i : i ]| i & I O t III«, I I 8if-tmuxi:12, -I §2 is°S9j ...----.••r ' __RC1700Q991129000 * 1RESERVE 117003991130000 17000160198011 a. I htToooiTwazooo 17000160- r17000170^32006 ,.j5SMMt 17000991727000)1SU« S *17000210:17000991726000<8* f118 BLOCK TWO -3S.W. 30 m+mft Copyright 2014 Otter Tail County. MN. Arcuracy is NOT guaranteed For REFERENCE puposes only. THIS IS NOTALEGA. DOCl^hfT. Wed Feb 11 2015 10:58:12 AM. 2-'U-2^0*£>t^SC w(^K: O d'Ji .# ^'0^, I ixfOC-l 7o jys 1 am unable to provide you v\/ith an answer at this time. In order to respond to your question, you need to supply some detailed information identifying the proposed attachment of the parcels, proposed use of each proposed parcel and a drawing identifying the existing structures (including number of dwellings) & septic systems showing their locations. Please be aware that the Shoreland Management Ordinance has different requirements for single family residential lots and cluster developments (resorts). Please contact me with any questions. Marsha Bowman McwihayBowmxMV Office' A dwUeUitrcvtor Lcvnd/£r Management (55C, SWWfiv fer^FcMi', MN 56537 218-998-8099 OTTER TRIlylfrJ 008BTI ■ BiaauoT* From: Bruce Zeller fmailto:bruce(5)lakeplace.com1 Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:51 PM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Pelican Lake Parcels Marcia My client is looking at a property that is for sale in OT County on Fish Lake. Parcels included in the sale are as follows; 17000170232006 17000991130000 17000991119000 3 17000991129000 17000170232000 He is only interested in making an offer on the following 2; 17000991129000 (has a double wide which would meet all set backs) 17000170232000 (bare land) Do you see any issue in someone making an offer on the above 2 parcels? Are they tied together at all with the remaining 3 parcels. They seem to have their own addresses. Thanks for your help. Bruce Zeller, Broker Lakeplace.com 218-849-7778 www.lakeplace.com Bruce Zeller, Broker Lakeplace.com 218-849-7778 4 Marsha Bowman Marsha Bowman Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:50 AM 'Steve & Barb Backstrom - Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners’ Bill Kalar ^-------------------—^ RE: Fish Lake property possible split question - ferfmer Inwood Beach Resort From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hi Barb Since I do not deal with larger septic systems, I have included Bill in this response and see if he can provide you with some insight on your question. This warmer weather is a welcomed change! Marsha Mariha/3owtyum> OffU>e/AdmlrUit)^atCfr Lo-nd/<& ReKTwrce-Mo/nogrefncnt' (55C, 540 W fir Fergi^yfaUi', MM 56537 218-998-8099 HOTTER mil OOVATT • •lAAIIOTI From: Steve & Barb Backstrom - Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners [mailto:sbbackstrom@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:13 PM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Re: Fish Lake property possible split question - former Inwood Beach Resort Hi Marsha - We are out of town right now so will need to schedule a meeting later. I would like to ask once more about keeping the property as a cluster development and using it as a resort. Since it is already classified that way, would just replacing the one septic that is not up to code be all that is required to begin operating again? Barb & Steve Backstrom Broker Associates Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners TEXT TO: 218-205-6286 (Cell) DIRECT: 1-888-905-6286 Toll Free FAX: 1-888-608-6286 Toll Free SBBackstrom@gmail.com http://www.CBBackstrom.com On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Marsha Bowman <MBowman@co.ottertail.mn.us> wrote: Hi. You have a lot of different questions to consider in an e-mail. I think that it would be best if you could define each of the different proposals (existing and proposed) and make an appointment with Bill. I can provide assistance 1 Marsha Bowman From: Sent: Marsha Bowman Monday, January 12, 2015 9:30 AM 'Steve & Barb Backstrom - Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners^------------ RE: Fish Lake property possible split question - formerUnwood Beach Resort To: Subject: Hi, You have a lot of different questions to consider in an e-mail. I think that it would be best if you could define each of the different proposals (existing and proposed) and make an appointment with Bill. I can provide assistance regarding general questions and Ordinance requirements, however as you know, we can’t make any assumptions on behalf of the Planning Commission and/or Board of Adjustment, as every request is considered individually. The reason for “2 blocks” is that the existing road separates the proposed lots, if the road was vacated, the Ordinance would have different requirements. A requirement is that each lot have access to a dedicated public road that meets the minimum road standards in the Subdivision Controls Ordinance. As far as preferring a cluster development over a single family residential proposal ... I can only offer that they would consider, the Application as presented, on the requirements of the Ordinance(s). If a proposal meets the Ordinance requirements, the considerations listed on page 28 of the Shoreland Management Ordinance are taken into consideration. As you are aware, one of the considerations in the Ordinance is compatibility. If you would like to have a pre-application meeting with Bill, you should provide your proposals and schedule a time (he is not available today) where you can discuss the various options. Please contact me if I can assist you any further! Marsha Mcwihciy'Bovjvyicvn/ Office' A dmXAruMycctor Lcvnd'dr Resource/Management (55C, 5W W fir ferg^cyfcdli-, MN 56537 218-998-8099 |i?OTTCR mil COUOTT • BlftfllJOT* From: Steve & Barb Backstrom - Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners [mailto:sbbackstrom@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 8:51 AM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Re: Fish Lake property possible split question - former Inwood Beach Resort Whew! I thought maybe the list had been revised and I was unaware. So, we still have the issue of the dedicated road. There is a newer road (Marquart Trl) behind the property on the east edge that everyone uses, so that is something to be dealt with but not an issue in practicality. Part of the dedicated road that divides this property could be vacated. I believe Marquart Trl is a township road. Regarding the lots being in different blocks, do you mean because part of it is platted and part of it is metes and bounds? Do you believe the board would prefer to see this property used as two single family homes, or do you believe they would prefer to keep it as a cluster development with the current mobile homes, camper sites, cabin, and double wide? We have had people looking at the property for that use as well. 1 If it was bought to be used as a resort again, I assume they would just need to bring the one septic system up to code, and they would be set. Could they replace the current mobile homes with camper sites or newer park models that fit in the same footprint? Again, thank you for any insight you can give us. We're trying to find the answers for the best possible use of this property for the seller. Barb & Steve Backstrom Broker Associates Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners TEXT TO: 218-205-6286 (Cell) DIRECT: 1-888-905-6286 Toll Free FAX: 1-888-608-6286 Toll Free SBBackstrom@gmail.com http://www.CBBackstrom.com On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Marsha Bowman <MBowman@co.ottertail.mn.us> wrote: OOPS!! Yes ... Fish Lake (56-768) is GD. Sorry ... Have a good day! Marsha Muriha^'BcnuwuMV Office' A d^ncniitratcrr Lccnd/£r Ke^ou^ce'Mccna.ge'ment QSC, 5WW fir fer^foRy, MN 56537 218-998-8099 @?<J7.TfR,Tnu From: Steve & Barb Backstrom - Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners rmailto:sbbackstrom(ia)amail.com1 Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 8:30 AM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Re: Fish Lake property possible split question - former Inwood Beach Resort Marsha -1 heard your VM. You stated in your message that it's RD requiring 150' water frontage. Isn't Fish Lake (Dunn Twp) a GD lake requiring 100' water frontage? The list I have shows it classified as GD. 2 Barb Barb & Steve Backstrom Broker Associates Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners TEXT TO: 218-205-6286 (Cell) DIRECT: 1-888-905-6286 Toll Free FAX: 1-888-608-6286 Toll Free SBBackstrom@gmail.com http://www.CBBackstrom.com On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Steve & Barb Backstrom - Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners <sbbackstrom@gmail.com> wrote: Happy New Year, Marsha! A couple weeks ago we spoke about the lots in a cluster development now owned by Bell State Bank. This property was formerly the Inwood Beach Resort. I asked you if it could be converted to two single family lots. You asked me to submit a sketch showing the lots, building locations, septics, and wells, and the possible split we are asking about. Please see attached. Please acknowledge you have received this. Please let me know if you need more info to let us know if you believe this is a good possibility for the property. I assume your office would rather see this as two single family residences rather than the resort with the mobile homes and camper sites, along with the current old cabin next to the water, double wide home, and old cabin with attached garage. I have talked with a surveyor as well, but we have not asked for a survey to be done until we know if this is likely to be approved by your office. Please let us know your thoughts on this possibility and what the procedure would be if you do think it is likely to be approved by your office. Thank you much! Barb 3 Barb & Steve Backstrom Broker Associates Coldwell Banker Preferred Partners TEXT TO: 218-205-6286 (Cell) DIRECT: 1-888-905-6286 Toll Free FAX: 1-888-608-6286 Toll Free SBBackstrom@gmail.com http://www.CBBackstrom.com On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Marsha Bowman <MBowman@co.ottertail.mn.us> wrote: As you requested... Mcu^ihoy'Bcrwmciyn/ Office' A dmcncj^atcn- Lccnd/£T Ke^/Ource'MccncL^eme^ QSC. 540 IV fir fer^i'yfcdU'.MN 56537 218-998-8099 Tnii OOOATT • SIOflllOTO 4 I ! 1 % »»AT. J.4 ^h mAii>^.*2i..«i.V3S___W ■>0 3 RESERVE I t "V M'SNO!3« eser\\^' a PiiBHC j. j,.»i"^ 26\®\^ f-BV 9 if'/TJ ■ iTr^e^son <S) J )4*6v;kt 1/' yO 7” /-. /7 «K S.E. CORNER I SEC. 17 RotefI ft OiiliMl Cdui% SuMyar TM G(k MhmMM S. 1/2 SEC. 17 j_„ --------'..rr —r A.r.fc::-- i.I\r^—'jt > N SEC 14,* "* ' '”"• '•A»v--jr r ;Department of ;LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL Phone 218-739-2271 Court House Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 ;MALCOLM K. LEE, Administrator I December 31, 1986 Mr. Millard Heim 2420 - 25^5 Avenue South Fargo, North Dakota 58103 RETAINING WALL(S) IN THE FISH LAKE AREA (56-768)RE: Dear Mr. Heim: 4 Our office has recently been informed that several wooden retaining walls have been constructed in the Fish Lake area. One of which appears to be located on your property. Please note that the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County requires a Conditional Use Permit (see Sec. IV, 2.a. of enclosed copy) for any alteration of the natural topography of land within a shoreland area of the county. Unfortunately, our records do not indicate that you have applied for or received a Conditional Use Permit for this project. Since this is apparently the case, please contact our office on or before January 20, 1987, so that this matter can hopefully be resolved. Sincerely, Bill Kalar Administrative Assistant BK:kaj Enclosure ; SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE - DIVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICE - SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE SEWAGE SYSTEM CLEANERS ORDINANCE - RECORDER, OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACK ORDINANCE FUEL AND ENERGY COORDINATION /'-Ts x3«-'>''*/ ■“• '7^ -o«»-ci ”" ^ /■'i^ -'^Y? i^-r-T* -=2f OSS'- 4:*^/ ^^^l3 ryyuLl l~h<->^ y2g»<SJ) /'-^-^ C£*Qa-^ '^5''Vv'i'Vs/-* <s------ -5» -4*^ j^-<^ <rcJL^A. — 1:9 /J'y'^-*^ r5)'L II- 12.-0^