Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOttertail Beach Resort_46000990217000_Variances_10-09-1997|0-q-)9qi-Cl of County Recorder County of Otter Tall ^ / APPLICATI($^ F^O^I^ARIANCE r 1 amr* ‘!SrC otter Tail County Or4- A.D. 19^7 at /O'.OS/) M. and was duly Microfilmed as Doc.# ^ Sr*”/.a 4.45-74.Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 (218) 739-2271lAH Application Fan S■ V.'li County Recorder _____Deputy — Please Complete With Black Ink —0^ /y A.^BBrrDoMlo Phone:Owner:MiddleFirstLast Name n]Al2.007E, 3 . Eox 12.Z-56SIS City OlTBiL t Zip No.StateStreet & No. __Lake ClassLake No.Lake Name 31 Range OTiSZ.Twp. NameSec.Twp. Legal Description:Fire No. or Lake ID # ^015 r^E/\lT^ OxbU)') ^ $ 'jUE/i'n Czz) Op 5loc.[l. T^JOCz.') op Parcel Number TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check): X ClusterStructure Setback Subdivision.Misc..Structure Size.Sewage System. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED: \a)b tz-sooesT F\ i;/)^i»^6e io co/^p A- 64P466 Aoomo/<l oajq lUE PP^Posso ^ocatioaI 7He S\dE ^/n/E, X FiTj^hA H^/STi/i/6 ^TOpAdB BolLDiyJG. Th-E400mo./ IS 1‘ ^X/57iW6 4-TT/FOv+Ei) ^,7e PdAW Awo 7^is ^BGicJsST /}lso SBA9 Vo7i^^-JTO ^ In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possibie, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. 19 ^7 . XApplication dated 19 9^7/o- 9Date of hearing:Time:M MOTION AS FOLLOWS: 0'Ute~ ■ . ig ., ^chairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment y Permit(s) from Land & Resource Management required: YES ///fv _________mailed copy of Application to Applicant. NO /oyy (Date/Initial) BK 0696-001 283.383 • Victor Lundeen Co . Printers • Fergus Fells. Minnesota “?'Hf ciuJ'fLir\Octobers, 1^97 Page /- ^y^jcK -3 ajl33 ^-S2'}y\j.f. (Ai(>i //; /S^dtu^ { dod^^tp /■■]c/I ■■ y C‘ /Ql /^SiMp..■■ -■ ^ /^&dup /9adipp Motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Randall Mann and unanimously4a^ed/toiapprove the addition of a garage to an existing storage building 7’ from the lot line and 4’ from the alley w^^the^concdjtion that the addition cannot contain any living quarters. It should be noted that the addition would Belio' close^^td^the side lot line than the existing structure. It was also noted that the location of the garage 4’ from the^Ngy/dgie§(n'pt>present any major concerns since the alley is not a through road and since the alley is not used as.a major ingress or egress for the 0 3 I // / development in that immediate area. r -^60/ dph 7 dup XlSdaf ' ILU 1 S-;I I Request for Variance t Property Name;Moe’s Otter Tail Beach Resort Owner: Address: Donald Moe Route 3. Box 122 Battle Lake, MN 55615 218-864-5860 Scott & Beth Madson Phone Number: Applicants: Variance Requested We request a variance to build a garage addition onto an existing storage building at Moe’s Otter Tail Beach Resort. The proposed location of the addition is T from the side lot line and 4’ from an existing alley bisecting the property. ' Reasons for the variance: The resort is in the process of being sold to the applicants for this variance, (Scott and Beth Madson). The resort currently has no garage or storage space for cars, lawn mowers, snowblowers, etc. The previous owner (Donald Moe) lives next door to the resort where he has had adequate storage space for these needs. The current owners property and storage buildings are not included in the sale of the resort. The proposed addition will improve the appearance of the resort by reducing the number of cars and the amount of equipment parked outside. This area will also double as a space for the new : owners to perform equipment maintenance during the off season. We do not believe that this addition will have any adverse impact to the property, the lake, or to neighboring properties for the following reasons: j • The existing alley running through the resort terminates at the north lot line and is used by resort patrons only. • The alley is already restricted by trees and will not be restricted any further by this addition. • The proposed addition does not encroach on the north lot line any further tlian the existing cabins or storage building. j • The proposed building location is the only logical place that a garage can be built on this property. In purchasing this resort we have invested in the area and intend to provide conWual improvement to a resort which has been in operation for over 60 years. We believe that this addition will approve the appearance of the resort by providing a place to park our cars, lawn mower, snow blower, and numerous pieces of resort equipment. In order for us to make a viable business of the resort, Beth will be working full-time outside of the resort, and Scott will be working part-time outside of the resort during the off season. Beth is currently employed at a construction company in Alexandria, which is a 50 mile drive from the resort. We feel that a garage is necessary to provide adequate protection for her car and to assure us that it will start during the harsh Minnesota winters. i ------------------- ^ Q i.y 'p ^r: I hi c j \ \<N O 'fo o>o>C\J iio 'Itt2; I-}f/) V X,o>QDai•_lJ L EXISTING DlEDiCATED ROAD- S53«24tJv 338'* *^23 I N| ^V '»-• 180'* " '138.18 -o0>IM g>IIo[S180'*13a 78*wmX S53°24 E a,■®1 m n>13938' (VJ d o<ntf)■"L 180'*C\JS53“24e HD“00 '00>ImCM ^ •*)CVJ ^0 g 139.98' CVJ fVJdd oUJ d1010iO182 U 10 00S53°24E -(o ^ S 184'* Sl ’00CO< s140.58' CM^110 d n1010 00I—-<o 1^SI aCVJ *N^ ol"©141.18' *^1^ T ^ f<T<S .0, d lo • ' «lco lx 80|■ol 8186'* S53®24E -<D m 186'*:il (VJ 8 8i 1 141.78 o S53°24E *®*cos s •n d ■ w 10 ® . <v St ' 10142.38 6 ^ 185'*’ ‘NO810 CO t o S53®24'E-co I ~Q0 *0DCO<? '5= SI (42,98’ A ^ 190'* <N ■>»•888 1010 _J S53°24E •®■to 13 £to 143.58' *^ <58 d 8m192'*I IS53®24'E'g-to CO q> >pUj to to 8 o 'j* iUjdd 10 'to 10192'*144.18'fO fO I0 .V <n tn eg o8S53®24Eto>■o Ito <?>144.78' 1.5 I\0 \\ 36'* • 16322' CVJ . 81 ixlz d z d• 8 10 juII -4- 'iO§i AREA vTO BE^ USEDSi |§F0R *WAY ^ ^ 36'*^ 163.22'l|" 145.38' 135'-^ S53»24'E'to r T ? , \ I A i^' ir S QT O' ®oi ' LAl\li to o, dl. t' sl lO 145.98’ ■ I -^d V’ZLlO "id_iO 10 z 196't roi:S53®24 E._ I -.1 Z to«-034‘■?!'X ' 5 JO ro '. ^COcri9^1 I 1014658'198'*000-4to >toS53°24Et„-tol?’8 e 200'* I 9 I <ro>H-i47.ia'IrrCO )S53®24£X15UJiNV■n oP*'a)cn____/4\l ----N-----<T»_i(^------------------ / \t lo'I ;o J \20'f\\t^ <o\^<^\ I'B !I \ /131.38^'fPTiC T/I/Vt^I 7 i *r‘f •>■5 /VT'■te.ee Auey zo' /■\ /polite.\VY /t !L A/\w /$gp^lcI\OJ 1 6-4 2.45 j AODfT/o^ 1^H _■V r71-u)1\IA ipT \ “STTriOil ■21:0 U^l ' Bxisri/^6 SrotASEK \f Resoet H0/4£ \ \ Q \ \1O i1\!\f/ ifrfl/-6-^Q \!U1 \\h~\<C \ o \ID o 1 i\vfl 3 7 A 5- ‘■2- \\r 0.6 y10\ i I0o'7LU yi \ ; 2/II7EPTI6 TA/)fL^ !I \ crnee.- iViiL. ; !L October 9,1997 Page 4 Gary and Roxanne Plonnbon - Approved Gary and Roxanne Plombon, Sartell, MN, requested a variance of approximately 39’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the replacement of an existing dwelling, which is located 7’ from the ordinary high water level, with a dwelling located approximately 36’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lot 5, Hilkoske’s Second Addition to Pleasure Park, Otter Tail Lake in Otter Tail Township. Mr. Hemelgarn, Contractor, represented the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 39’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the replacement of an existing dwelling, which is located 7’ from the ordinary high water level, with a new dwelling located 36’ from the ordinary high water level. The proposed dwelling is behind the string line as determined when applying the string line between the structure two lots to the right of the applicants’ property and to the structure one lot to the left the proposed dwelling. It was noted that there are many non­ complying structures in this immediate area. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. Nancy and Todd Johnson - Withdrawn Nancy and Todd Johnson, Ottertail, MN, requested a variance to “build a 36’ x 56’ pole building. South East corner of building would be 8’ from lot line to permit the use of the existing road and allow future removal of present house (next year), with minimal tree removal, and still allow 27’ clearance." The property is described as part of Government Lot 2, Section 8 of Otter Tail Township by Otter Tail Lake. Prior to the scheduled public hearing the applicants provided notification that they were withdrawing their variance application. Dale V. and JoAnn M. Hinsverk - Denied Dale V. and JoAnn M. Hinsverk, Wahpeton, ND, requested the following: “I would like to have the living quarters above the garage left as is for minor usage.” The variance request is to allow more than one dwelling on the applicants’ property. The property is described as part of Government Lot 1, Section 2 of Everts Township by Otter Tail Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. Letters from the following individuals addressing the variance request were read for the record: Neil E. Heitkamp, Wilfred Heitkamp and Marcella Heitkamp. After consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested noting the variance requested was for a use strictly prohibited by the ordinance. Donald Albert Moe - Approved Donald Albert Moe, Battle Lake, MN, requested “a variance to build a garage addition onto an existing storage building. The proposed location of the addition is 7’ from the side lot line and 4’ from an existing alley bisecting the property.” The property is described as Lots 1, 2, 21 and 22, Block 2, Midway Park, Otter Tail Lake in Otter Tail Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. Scott Madson appeared along with the applicant at the public hearing. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to approve the addition of a garage to an existing storage building 7’ from the lot line and 4’ from the alley with the condition that the addition cannot contain any living quarters. It should be noted that the addition would be no closer to the side lot line than the existing structure. It was also noted that the location of the garage 4’ from the alley does not present any major concerns since the alley is not a through road and since the alley is not used as a major ingress or egress for the development in that immediate area. RECEIVED OTTER TAIL COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFIctf^ ^ lANDS RESOURCEPage i of 1 Page i^ rr^/:\Tj .4 • CFS DISPOSITION SHEET Type of Complaint Case Number 08012310 Date Ongoing Time N/AMisuse of public lake access Place of Occurrence Ottertail Beach Resort How Reported Date Reported 04/02/08 Time 1420 hrs Reported to Brandnef, Steven L.In Person Name Last D.O.B.Principal Complainant Middle Vinal hirst HerbertChristensen Jr City State MN ZipHome Address Street 28879 State Hwy 78 o56515Battle Lake 00 Local Address Street City State Zip o □ Video Tape r~l Audio Tape I/ake/Lxk:al/PagerPhone Home 218-367-2650 Cell Work to; MiddlePrincipalName Last D.O.B.First Ottertail Beach Resort V,,'. ■oState MN:. City ZipHome Address Street 28255 N. Midway Park Driv 56524Battle Lake Local Address Street ZipCityN State r~l Video Tape □ Audio Tape Lake/Local/Pager WorkPhoneHumeCell Principal Name Last D.O.B.First Middle City State ZipHome Address Street StreetLocal .Address City State Zip □ Video Tape I~1 Audio Tape Phone Home Cell Lake/Local/Pager Work Principal Name Last First Middle D.O.B. City State ZipHome Address Street Local Address Street ZipCityState r~l Video Tape □ Audio Tape Phone Home Cell Lake/Local/Pager Work DescriptionSuspect ^'ehicle Lie # N/A N/A Propertc .Attacked Type of Entry' Public access on Otter Tail Lake N/A Tool or Weapon Object of Attack N/A N/A Trade Mark Synopsis of Complaint: Complainant alleges that the owners of Ottertail Beach Resort are illegally using public lake property as their own. According to Christensen, he thinks that the resort has developed shoreline on Otter Tail Lake that is supposedly platted as a public access. Christensen alleges that the resort has developed parking areas for its clients on the property. He says that he maintains accesses for the township and that is how he is aware of the public access designation. Christensen is concerned that if the resort continues to use the public access as their own property, eventually they will claim it as such. Please forward this report to Otter Tail County Land and Resource Management for follow-up. Photos 0 Yes S No Q Need to be taken Status: Refer to other agency Officer's Signature # Deputy Steve Brandner #328 SB:jml 06/09/08 @ 1428 hrs ADMl cc: Otter Tail County Land Management 061008 "D FILE MEMO PROPERTY OWNER Scotl-t- 3<^ yYl£,c/iir\ Otf-c^TiZJ _______ Scott & Beth Medion 282SS N. Midway hrk Dr. Battle Lake, MN S6S15 I.800.45I.07I0 2I8.864.S860 Email; otbeeeh@prtel.com Est. 1948 NAME www.oftertailbeaehresoii.com L&R OfndalDate 77ie^>u Sco-^ .Lo y\\J t iT % o ‘—ItAction/Comments__^ PttiA^ L/Oc« l\ S \0-C\TC_ pp.rYvi ,^V7 O /.S •/'TCu-%^ eJt K O ^ Ce ^ cJe'c/ ^oi"re &u /✓< ^O^C -c. e( 9-0 \lrc(S ApfiroK ^STo ~^D'o' l-eS^ ho-h>^ H'7./-oL. Date Action/Comments gL K>/ /Wc>^ ~A//^ / ^ 7><g- ^Q/fQ RM hT a/^ ^ ^ST’^jr~h7^S g , «P 7^ /jr ) (_ ori\^ 4 ArV4 r! rS L&R Official AfoT' ></>/ iLtf-dg. 7r IT o 7>e^t>r\/TAc 7- o^pr, L&R Official.Date Action/Comments. \ I\ t73 /!lOo 1 ScAf.^ I 20------ r / .. V BI \ I13^38t>ep^\c ? 7 I <rif'->5 \i j\7V -te.ee ^o' Alley ZO^ /~\ /powte.i \S(y / A IT /\ /^gpn/c)\CJ 1 6AS.A6B. I AoDmo7 1^' /CH7 mH1'V/7 1\III'O -2f-I<\ £//5ri/^6 STOE.A6E IK-7 K \I Resoet Hofy\£ \ \IQ\ \\O 1^ I \\fQ\IU1\\H \<C I\ IQIliJ \ \vj)3■2-i\ UO I>< I0O'LU \ I i 2 IIPEPTICIT/Wt,\ OTVBE- -T4»L. ! / - «HW-| V \>^ xp ^ g!ri c j IL Q'7^•/.y \ <\VO'. O '/b CDr -C:0>CM <(.0 s7ft21\1 \, \1-It a (D■-*• cn X- rn ,^ix0CiVlJ L EXISTING Dl-:PIC AT ED POkD :-S53®24E'^_ 338* ■ CM| 2d« —i (go f^20'* \138.18' ^ I3a78 •a.'cD CM1a 2180'*in S53024 E -00col P>"cD n> ^0' s139.38' CM CM d o • \lOlO*”1 tso't \00 \SI S53^4E *60 \\"oo>ICOc\J % -b CM 'iP V sCM 6 UJ o'oomininin182*.*139.98*00- S53‘>24E-oo 5! 00 -1. D» W ^ CM ^ 00 184* i al *00 ^ CMc)10o|10 IIinin140.58*00I S53'’24E*oo"00 a Sj-o 141.18* ______ .0, o |' «lco CM«S IX0|ml 186'*■cx.t'S53®24E 0)00<3 <b 186’* «.:il CM 8 g 141.78*.! 1 S SI I »o O* *0 tf> S53®24lE •<»*00€0CM <' g142.38’ *o ^ 185** o 8ID 00 I o S53°24'E-o)‘ CD *0000x'b SI 142.98* A <b 190'* •■cr 888 infO S53®27eZJ •00smIS<0 S 143.58* ” 00*2»8d. 8 in192'*{ IS53®24*E-oo•00 *o>CD ^ 'PUl ‘Na ❖ s'- SUJo8U)in192**144.18*fO fO 0 ,(D fO fvj O . ;g^c^. S63® 24 E-m 'o I Slui 144.78 l.53t^l-i^ 1\0 \\ 36'* 163.22* CM a2 C3 ■ 8 =^1 _UIII 4'AREA vTO BE^ USE oil |dF0R ^ . 36'*^ 163.22* “L 1” 145.38' 1.55'^“~ —♦ -' ' . r—< I •- " " ' m -^don 40 10o K>S53‘>24*E"cn \ LAKE S 'o 2'CJl oi C)l. A 145.98 $Q| o o| ID ml .J O) CD 196**ro \>«vl z CMS-0J4*■g!toNO '. 'I-a^<T)CO J 10198'*14658'00o >CMS53°24E^■cni ez<b 200'* IO)1CDCD <rcnM-147.18*I■cr ><0 S53®24'E X'b U N-l5_V N 9.^*000>CD &(D/tC"rr\l Request for Variance Moe’s Otter Tail Beach ResortProperty Name: Donald Moe Route 3. Box 122 Battle Lake, MN 55615 218-864-5860 Scott & Beth Madson Owner: Address:' Phone Number: Applicants: Variance Requested We request a variance to build a garage addition onto an existing storage building at Moe’s Otter Tail Beach Resort. The proposed location of the addition is T from the side lot line and 4’ from an existing alley bisecting the property. Reasons for the variance: The resort is in the process of being sold to the applicants for this variance, (Scott and Beth Madson). The resort currently has no garage or storage space for cars, lawn mowers, snowblowers, etc. The previous owner (Donald Moe) lives next door to the resort where he has had adequate storage space for these needs. The current owmers property and storage buildings are not included in the sale of the resort. The proposed addition will improve the appearance of the resort by reducing the number of cars and the amount of equipment parked outside. This area will also double as a space for the new owners to perform equipment maintenance during the off season. We do not believe that this addition will have any adverse impact to the property, the lake, or to neighboring properties for the following reasons: • The existing alley running through the resort terminates at the north lot line and is used by resort patrons only. • The alley is already restricted by trees and will not be restricted any further by this addition. • The proposed addition does not encroach on the north lot line any further than the existing cabins or storage building. • The proposed building location is the only logical place that a garage can be built on this property. In purchasing this resort we have invested in the area and intend to provide continual improvement to a resort which has been in operation for over 60 years. We believe that this addition will approve the appearance of the resort by providing a place to park our cars, lawn mower, snow blower, and numerous pieces of resort equipment. In order for us to make a viable business of the resort, Beth will be working full-time outside of the resort, and Scott will be working part-time outside of the resort during the off season. Beth is currently employed at a construction company in Alexandria, which is a 50 mile drive from the resort. We feel that a garage is necessary to provide adequate protection for her car and to assure us that it will start during the harsh Minnesota winters.