Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutChaffee_02000990359000_Memos,Correspondences, File Notes_& FILE MEMO &f ’ PROPERTT OWNERPARCEL # fifiO f9d3M(Xi() LAKE OR RIVER NAME & NO jL 77c/ ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ \ WJp^JjySJhjdJ. A A. / '/7jAJm7j7//A \ V/jL /-Date L&R Official Action/Comments cmi '£"j ^fj]f'^. Ay/Mjjdj M WlJ, ,____ i l/hiA/niL (jzpaiAj^A . \JJIp. ^ ‘ ^ u^y^A/J^yyr/fJ^ j y/jj /t/D/yi7/Pjd/^ /^ ^ a7pA: ^ M (/b Mwg/pi L&R OfficiaLDate :© CMffit i^rnkTwiL ^£' ccto^TTA U)H/^u^ eNp^/v^i^-v (^ J^Lv’dii.'l fV*<» ^ Action/Comments. 1 ^ /f p/to/^L6'*l i^iTit !'*OATK li: — rriA-f Date L&R Official Action/Comments. ' V L&R OfficialDate Action / Comments. LSUl Official.Date Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate. Action / Comments. L&R OfficialDate. Action/Comments. October 9, 2007 Joyce Thompson Kyle Westergard called from the site. He had made all the measurements and found that the proposed entry/foyer would be less than 20’ from the ROW and the proposed screened porch would be less than 75’ from the OHWL. He also informed me that this property was probably still considered a “Cluster” since there were multiple dwellings on site. He suggested I discuss this with Bill Kalar, since it would also require CUP approval for the proposed projects. He told me that he would review everything with me when he returned to the office on the 10**’. I reviewed the file again and found that Bill had met with Mr. Chaffee on August 29, 2005. He had prepared a “Cluster Development Pre-Application Meetings Notes” form based on their discussions. I had mistakenly assumed the lot to be considered as “single-family residential” because the file was not indicated as a Cluster File (filed in with the lake files). Based on those notes 1 discussed the property with Bill. He confirmed that this property is still a Cluster and therefore any proposed additions would be considered expansions and require an approved CUP as well as approved Variances. October 10, 2007 Joyce Thompson Kyle discussed his findings with me and I confirmed that indeed he was correct about it being a Cluster. I called Mr. Chaffee and explained everything to him. We discussed the fact that no permits could be issued until Variances had been approved and a CUP had been approved for the proposed additions. I told him that I would return the materials. He asked me to wait until he could determine if he could make it in to the office to file the Variance by October 11* at 3:00p.m. He also needed to discuss all of these issues with his son and daughter-in-law. We also discussed the need to sign the applications and the Waiver forms. Bill had told me that Mr. Chaffee could sign all the forms if he had a legally executed Power of Attorney to act for the family. October 11, 2007 Joyce Thompson Having heard nothing more from Mr. Chaffee since the morning of October 10*, 1 prepared a cover letter and returned the Site Application along with the CUP & Variance materials (see copy in file). L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. 6^ iAAe/iL tjyfb yJA/yn^ Ap.V 4. Ul V Date L&R Official Action/Comments. f ^ > V J' L & file memo PARCEL #PROPERTY OWNER LAKE/RIVER/WETLAND NAME 1Joyce ThompsonOctober 4, 2007 Mr. Orison Chaffee (father of property owner Orison Chaffee III) brought in copies of application materials for proposed additions to the existing structure (formerly the store building) on this property. His son is out of the country and could not present the materials himself, however he had copies of his proposal sent to his father. Mr. Chaffee requested to speak with me since I had talked with his son during the summer about his proposed plans. I told Mr. Chaffee that we could use the copies as references for reviewing the proposal, however in order to file for actual permits only original documents (application & scale drawing) could be submitted. As we reviewed the proposed plans we discussed that the black top/concrete parking area that was in front of the structure had all been removed. (Note: I had explained to Orison Chaffee (son) during our conversation earlier in the year that before any permits could be issued the impervious cover would have to meet the 25% maximum allowed. What he proposed to do along with what existed on site would have put the lot over the 25%. At that time Orison Chaffee suggested that they could remove the hardscape of the parking area, since they had already made plans to do so in the future. I told him that once the lot was in compliance he could submit the application materials. At the time of that conversation we also discussed the other SMO requirements including setbacks.) Mr. Chaffee and I went over the application form requirements as well as scale drawing requirements in detail. We also discussed all setback requirements until he clearly understood how he was to measure from OHWL, lotlines, ROW, septic, etc. When we started discussing the ROW he was not clear as to how to locate it. I told him that there were triangle-shaped signs along CSAH 1 with “RW” on them - that identifies the ROW. He said he had seen them and didn’t know what they were. I told him the proposed addition to the front of the structure had to be at least 20’ from the ROW of Highway 1. We also discussed the stringtest requirements because he asked about how that was done, since one of the neighbors had built using the stringtest for his location. I gave Mr. Chaffee an application form, several scale drawing forms and the SMO. I told him that he could request that one of our inspector’s make a site visit to verify all setbacks before any permits were issued. He thanked me and left. f'i- Joyce ThompsonOctober 5, 2007 Mr. Chaffee called. He had been able to make all the measurements and was working on the scale drawing. His concern was that the 20’ setback to the ROW could not be met. He said they may have to alter the size of the proposed addition. I told him to bring the scale drawing of the proposals to the office on Monday or Tuesday (10/8 or 9) and we would request a site inspection. If the setback could not be met the property owners would have the option to file for a Variance by October 11* at 3:00 p.m. I reminded Mr. Chaffee that as the agent for his son he could sign the application forms but could not sign the 60-day Waiver. He said that his daughter-n-law was still in the U.S. and he could FED EX the documents for her signatures. L&K UTTICiai October 8, 2007 Joyce Thompson Mr. Chaffee came to the office and delivered the Application for Site Permit and scaled drawings (originals). I reviewed them with him. It appears from his measurements that all setbacks would be met. However, he agreed that we should request a Pre-Application Site Visit. I told him that I would contact him after the inspection was completed. He asked if this could be processed quickly eind I told him that I would ask the inspectors to please try to get it done ASAP in case a Variance would be necessary.4- % rI ; ^^ sf 818S17 Offier s? S'*/ Coun^' ui litter i aii I hereby ceftity ih?t (he wbhin Inaniment was fds! __^dayo-Ibr in rnu offica on the islSL nd ¥«$ duly Nhcrohimed as Dot.!-517 Cauniv • u'lr...'r ___r*,''--' ,1 LAND SURVEYOR’S CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION TO PLAT Name of Plat: CAMP HATTON Pursuant to the provision of Chapter SOS/.fTS, Laws of Minnesota, 1957, David A. Anderson, the undersigned, a Registered Land Surveyor in and for the State of Minnesota, declares as follows: 1. That the plat of CAMP HATTON dated August 29, 1917 and filed on September 22, 1917 in the office of the County Recorder, Otter Tail County, Minnesota, in Book J of PlatSi Page 11, was prepared by Harry E. Aalberg, County ■• Surveyor, deceased. 2. That said plat contains the following omissions to wit; The call along the shore of Otter Tail Lake was omitted fforn the legal description on said plat. 3. that the legal description on said plat is hereby corrected as follows, to wit: Beginnirig at a point which lies North 63 degrees 19 minutes East and 60 feel distant from Meander Comer No. 19 in Section 12 of Township 134, R^ge 40 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian; thence North 2 degrees 41 miiurtes West 100 feet; thence North 17 degrees 26 minutes East 175 feet; thence North 5 degrees 59 minutes East 75 feet; thence North 10 degrees 15 minutes West 225 feet; thence North 6 degrees 38 minutes West 300 feet, thence North 9 degrees 47 minutes East 75 feet, thence North 27 degrees 56 minutes East 150 feet; thence South 80 degrees 05 minutes East 366 feet; thence South 69 degrees 06 minutes East 375 feet to the shore of Otter Tail Lake; thence South 49 degrees West along said shore of Otter Tail Lake 300 feet; thence South 42 degrees 03 minutes West along said shore of Otter Tail Lake. 75 feel; thence South 31 degrees 53 minutes West along said shore of Otter Tail Lake. 75 feet; thence South 41 degrees 53 minutes West along said shore of Otter Tail Lake. 75 feet thence North 64 degrees 19 minutes West 178 feet to the easterly line of the public highway; thence South 13 degrees'51 minutes West 94 feet; thence South 23 degrees 21 inihutes West 50 feet; thence South 5 degrees 29 minutes East 150 feet to said shore of Otter Tail Lake: thence South 35 degrees 21 minutes We^ along said shore of Otter Tail Lake 60 feet; thence South 58 degrees 39 , minutes West along said shore of Otter Tail Lake. 76.3 feet; thence South 44 degrees 19 minutes West along said shore of Otter Tail Lake. 191 feet to the place of beginning. I ; ■> -J • David A. Anderson Land Surveyor Minn. Reg. No. 13620 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL l (The foregoing instalment was acknowledged before me this /3rh day of Anderson. , !•19 ^.bv David A. Cl£MEKTM.HBH)nCKSON NOTARY niBUC-MUWESOTA OTTER TAl COUNTY M(Cb»i»bIwBsm»J*N.31,8W0 Notary (Yublic, Otter Tail Coi^ty, Minnesota My Commission Expires :;■ This above Certificate of Correction to the plat of CAMP HATTON has bean approved by the Board of Commissioners of Otter,Tail County, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held on the ™_____day of ^ • •3- / enairman^ the County Board fAttest * f / OTTER TAIL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SUB OFFICE 222 2nd AVENUE S.E. PERHAM, MINNESOTA 56573 218-346-3175 MAIN OFFICE OTTER TAIL COUNTY COURTHOUSE FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA 56537 218-739-2271 February 1991 Licensed Recreational Campgrounds and ResortsTO: Doug Johnson, R.S.FROM: New Construction Plan ReviewRE: Consultation with the Shoreland Management Office has resulted In the following policy concerning remodeling or new construction at a resort or recreational campground. Effective February 1, 1991, prior to the Shoreland Management Office Issuing the required permit, you will need to provide them with a complete plan review form from the Health Department. (Copy Enclosed). Thu addition of permanent rooms and screened porches to recreational vehicles is not consistent with the Otter Tail County Recreational Campground Ordinance, however this construction has been permitted by the Shoreland Management Office. This policy Interpretation error has resulted In recreational camping vehicles being altered to the extent that they no longer meet the definition of a recreational camping vehicle. (Copies Enclosed). The existing construction will be allowed to remain as is and will be evaluated by the County Health Department on an Individual basis during routine Inspections. This Department will work with the campground owners In an effort to bring these structures Into compliance with current regulations. Such structures may need to be reclassified cabin Instead of a recreational vehicle.as a The construction of permanent accessory structures on recreational ^ camping sites will no longer be permitted. Any temporary accessory structure such as attached awnings, carports or individual storage facilities and accessory structures on manufactured home sites must meet all set back requirements of the County Manufactured Home Park and Recreational Camping Area Ordinance. ___ If you should have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact me at 218-739-2271, Ext. 290. Wally Senyk Shoreland Management Officecc: cc: i A o 9(^ 'N ■ ^V> 5:^\0'^ o .>Ni------\.vi^o 0fsr^I ^ -i^^2(^~10 -|----- be. p\<^Cy’''»'^ M’’ for \j4>\^'»/ b«^H t, b''*'^^ •<v»»jT Por-T: 1 i Vsj’\>^ CO o» -TX , o>ourdtn^“ y'^To ^0€.t Oi^’i', AkiO 'Pw-f /'•^> \/ol\tyhio\\ I io /-^ U o O Cou.v^ ctpp^-^ C ' v^ //sO * l/«/Uy S ap/5^^^ 26 X S'6 ' ^A//! ficPPrtr/ i^Aep / A^-o /^///c^ouifY %». QaaYJ[ yor^, /y)A-yhju S^r*^i *i^6<ijcC<- '^tv^tr <5^riou.oO Cou.*'~^‘'^ o Qv^s i -I C6<Jl^T 4 \ .7 - g a ZlOT'^ ___ _ ^pm-L kLf* Kt GvticJ 1^ Box !J2ulLhuJ.k_^:'-f3 SThST}^ OoM^-/v Vd^-U ^990 I ^0i//fcc li I GRID PLOT PLAN SKETCHING FORMfeet/inchesScale: Each grid equals V 19Dated:Signature Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake and sideyarp'for eacf\ buTidfng currently on lot and any proposed structures. 0^ 1 L . r f (t . L I \\\i: i•i 1 ■■I \"1 i Ii I ■ I f 1 t ii i ;II!‘ I/ Li \ 21598 7®MKL-0871-029 VICTOR LUNOEEN CO.. PRINTERS. FERCUO FALLS. WINN. TUDUj i? _________ c**>v<vvD3Z1l <!t /VJ-'Oo^A/X ________ ^L, 4 oi...::c&(’ rra.3«3, iS^’i’ /='^ /s-<? /^ j) ._..i3_^SJ_el± !A^^3S^ X ^JUl.'vCJC ^ / ^ y «^.5”^^f<r‘*-0'v.<XB, ! /'t-~*XL^_____T~________________^ /7i5~' - I ^wCA.