The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17000991526000_Variances_08-07-2008OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify tha^ ()4346V this instrument #_Z_________ was fiied/recorded ii^his office for record on the / day of 2008 at ^■■OO "^ecordinq fe^ weii certificMe 1043467 {ai^m THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLiCATiON FOR VARIANCE received JUL 1 02008 LAND & KLSOURCF COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee \I4S- 733COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date MAILING ADDRESS 1 (p I S I'^c^r't'LL. S'V~. LtU^0^ ' LAKE NUMBER '^(c^C>'7(£dIC>C> LAKE NAME L ■ W Ue 65/ S75Vyt^DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER S$(I9 LAKE CLASS TOWNSHIP 13 1 hRANGETOWNSHIP NAMESECTION PARCEL noODOX. OO I (p 00 3 0O6^^ \5di£C>^ NUMBER 1 lOODO X OO ^ OP H H DDCAA \ ADDRESS (Q^ ''I I>AK L (S Oc3<4 CC r\ Lo+ i-A 1. aoi /\ (dO' /dte<- U , Ajiiy LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3r\L<. PT'^'-^TR Xo UtV 9^4 RE’S LOT r PEUCftIV) HEI6H-TS SOBb RirS LOT F pELia^M t4ei6K-T5 SUBb TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. -75' sd Ol4lJL. - ^ ^ d-,6'JAMrrh 'ffdb 100'OhHOL CL y. (ob‘ ucllMel^^ (}Jb 75' L^A.&7rU H'fuu Ol^tO^ I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. i--. .J ,CS'c0^\.c: DATESIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNE ENT FOR OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) O0lliLyLLt plfnLL^Oa ' /W)Date Of Hearing Time c Motion Barbara Jean Zahasky - Denied. (7:25 p.m.) After consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate practical difficulty/hardship had been shown that would allow for the grating of the variance as requested, the requested variance is for new construction and there is adequate room on the applicant’s property to place the proposed new structure in a location that does not require the granting of a variance. In addition, the Board of Adjustment noted that following: 1.) the applicant's request is a substantial variation from the requirements (25% reduction in required setback) 2.) there is another feasible method which would alleviate the need for a variance because there is adequate room on the property to place the proposed development 100’ from the ordinary high water level if the applicant would consider turning the proposed development 90 degrees, 3.) the granting of the variance will not secure for the applicant a right or rights enjoyed by others as dwellings on other lotsjjiibis immediate area are farther from the ordinary high water level than what is being proposed by the applicant and 4.Uhe'sewage treatmept^ill need to be fed7 il County Board of Adjust^ntCh^man/Otter T, Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 0407-001 329.512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls. Minnesota August 7, 2008 Page # 2 Brad and Helen Nelson - Approved the application as modified with a condition. (7:15 p.m.) Brad and Helen Nelson, Lot 22 Birchwood Shores, Pickeral Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: We need a variance of 5T from the 100’ ordinary high water level setback to build a.4-season addition replacing our rotting deck. The addition will be 49’ from the lake. We also request a variance of 2’ from the 10’ setback to the lot line for this addition. It will be a little over 8’ from the lot line. We want /have to replace the 2 remaining decks that are old and rotting with 2 new decks in the same foot print and size. The 2 decks are approximately 33’ 6" from the lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. An email from Terry and Diane Reard in opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. After consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve construction of a 4-season addition no closer to the ordinary high water level than the front of the existing cabin with the condition that the proposed development must meet the required side lot line setback. It should be noted that no variances were granted for the proposed deck replacement projects as the applicants, under provisions of existing law, have the ability to replace the decks so long as the new decks are the exact size and shape of the existing decks and are place in the same location as the existing decks. Barbara Jean Zahasky - Denied. (7:25 p.m.) Barbara Jean Zahasky, Reserve Lots E and F, Pelican Heights Subdivision and part of Government Lot 5, Section 2 of Dunn Township by Little Pelican Lake, requested a variance of 25’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the construction of 28’ by 66’ replacement dwelling 75’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate practical difficulty/hardship had been shown that would allow for the grating of the variance as requested, the requested variance is for new construction and there is.adequate room on the applicant’s property to place the proposed new structure in a locationThat does not require the granting of a variance. In addition, the Board of Adjustment noted that following: 1.) the applicant’s request is a substantial variation from the requirements (25% reduction in required setback) 2.) there is another feasible'method which would alleviate the need for a variance because there is adequate room on the property to place the.proposed development 100’ from the ordinary high water level if the applicant would consider turning the proposed development 90 degrees, 3.) the granting of the variance will not secure for the applicant a right or rights enjoyed by others as dwellings on other lots in this immediate area are farther from the ordinary high water level than what is being proposed by the applicant and 4.) the sewage treatment will need to be upgraded. Daniel Erickson - Approved the application as modified. (7:38 p.m.) Daniel Erickson, Lot 7 Block 1 Oakdale Second Addition, South Turtle Lake in Tordenskjold Township, requested a variance of 28’ from the required ordinary high water'level setback of 100’ for the construction of an attached garage 72’ from the ordinary high water level. Linda Erickson appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Carl Zick and unanimously carried, to approve the placerfient of a 28’ by 30’ garage no closer to the ordinary high water level then in a straight line from the front (40’ side) of the proposed 28’ by 40’ dwelling, which must be placed in a location that meets the setback requirements of the ordinance. Practical difficulty/hardship is the terrain of the applicant’s property and water pn two side of the property. Thomas and Rhonda Franklin and Ronald and Linda Franklin - Approved Option No. 2 with a condition. (7:56 p.m.) Thomas and Rhonda Franklin and Ronald and Linda Franklin, the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and part of Government Lot 5, Section 22 of Hobart Township by Rose Lake, requested the following: Variance Request Option No. 1 - Requesting a. boundary line adjustment of the east property line to run parallel with the west property line. The property will change shape but not size. This will allow the adjacent landowner to have level access to his property. Variance Request Option No. 2 -7 Request boundary line adjustment to reduce the 2.61 acre tract (Parcel #32000220158002) by approximately 23,160 square feet to make the east property line run parallel to the west property line.- The triangular piece to be attached to adjacent parcel #32000220158001. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve Option No. 2 as described in the variance application dated July 15, 2008 and as depicted on the drawing submitted'with the variance application with the condition that a registered surveying drawing must be submitted at the time of conveyance. 1 --.1 t SCALE DRAWING FORMr / ycpooo z.ao i(aOO 3 /7Oocfo i{o g>e> ^ Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type, size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high water level(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. t" 30'fi. 7 %Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) tv1 ■i .1 received JUt 102008 i-AND & KtSOUi^CF 1 I. ( -/)/)•///."if 1 T ✓ \Nj >. » i..I..[■! : ,4_ I 4.: :•V -Q\vi\5 >0 %>/tcri i ^T V-%S) 5 - 7b t /hO*/ T Vi sL I LffK^ \ 1 I II Signature of Property Owner Date !BK — 0207 329,086 • Veto Lundnn Co. Printers ■ Fergus Falls. MN • 1.800-3484870i ' » IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALGULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): :Ft^Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s): 19%Ft2Driveway(s): Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s):•5 Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wail(s): Ft2Landscapingir (Plastic Barrier) Other: li,' Ft2 5b, x^o ^ R2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: Ft2LOT AREA:A 'lot area A 6V(S>.osy xioo =.% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOTOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE . .1- - < • ■ 'il ;V . .* t . I*tf- t fv r •i { V • t