The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17000991469000_Variances_03-26-1998Office of County Rrcorder Cciiftty of Ui*t-r Taii I htreby c*rtfy tfiai tte vwtnin. i<’.strar:iem was filed fcr tecofd,in tts otfjcs on ine _ ^ day of ■JAfirvV A.D 19Clg . .. at lFfeAM duly Microfiimso a Doc.#.^1833and Ce«T% ttecorcfw Qeci.ty THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS. MN 56537 (218) 739 - 2271 « « «COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK * « *f60-00 Receipt Number J T i ^ (jcff vJariC) DAYTIME PHONE Application Fee ST. AJ. Moi^rheaJ. MH S6S60 - 76/ /y U/?/? PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS L /^e/^caf! La/<&AOLAKE NAME LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS /3 7 0^2.SECTION 0^7 TOWNSHIP RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME j^SS70 //o. FIRE NUMBER OR LAKE I.D. NUMBER /7- OOP -JJ~/¥6>^ -OOP LEGAL DESCRIPTION received 19 1998 UNO S RESOURCE Oot 6 ^//C / TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Size___Sewage System____ SubdivisionStructure Setback Cluster Misc. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED )/0c arc -for a. sCfbaoK -fforo, fhe IcflCe. o>-f jflO -fecf ■for year^ Ofroi/nJ /iorr)e, f'h'ts \/youlcl <£n^?ble. (as fo a [A^ri^K-ouf hasevy)cni'. (ouf n^X'f' door has a^i^roxfrnrifely the Same sefb^cK \/^Jth vJa\f~~o\Ai basemertf.^ ^)sjL -fr5-0 Uo-f-T { lL'^ Jof Biuiff I UNDERSTAND THATjl HANffi APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION TONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. So IS /z^'-fyoix I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. ^-/7-fS SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNEI DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Oate/Time Of Hearing) /-/d Xli//• // 'I 7 / /¥^7 /¥yo /</?/ ^ /zsn- 00/ / 4 ■*«.' citijf / 4- '7‘~ d^^pr /M& ^/I'illfAccepted By Land & Resource L & R Official/Date 3-AL- ^S'7.-SaTimeDate Of Hearing Motion Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried to deny the variance as requested noting that the Department of Natural Resources assisted with the establishment of the bluff impact zone and noting that other good building sites do exist on the applicants’ property that would not require a variance from the bluff impact zone. Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management _____Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 0797-001 2B7.383 * Victor Lundeon Co.. Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota April 2,1998 Page 9\ Sayles and Marian Brodersen (Clarification)- For purposes of clarification the Board was asked if they intended the proposed addition to be 10’ from the septic tank when they approve a side lot line variance on October 2,1997 for Sayles and Marian Brodersen. The Board reviewed the information contained within the file and determined that it was clearly stated that the addition to the existing structure must be at least 10’ from the septic tank. Jeff and Melody Bober (Reconsideration) - Jeff and Melody Bober requested, by letter, reconsideration of their variance request which was denied at the March 26, 1998 Board of Adjustment meeting. The Board reviewed their application and determined that the information being presented had not change significantly to warrant reconsideration of the previous hearing or the Board’s decision. The Board also stated that they would not consider any lessor setback from the top of the bluff then the required 30’. With no further business Chairman Walter declared the meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. uOWayne ^in.Secretary March 26, 1998 Page 4 Kevin and Margie Kuehl - Approved Kevin and Margie Kuehl, Maple Grove, MN, requested a variance to replace an existing roof with a new roof having a 10/12 pitch. The structure is approximately 47’ from the ordinary high water level and within 4’ of two 600-gallon septic tanks. The property is described as the South 114’ of the North 55T of the East 208’ of Government Lot 4, Section 16 of Candor Township by Leek Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve the variances necessary to replace an existing roof with a new roof having a 10/12 pitch with the condition that site permit for this project cannot be issued until the water and/or septic system has been upgraded to meet current standards. Sheldon and Stacy Hein - Tabled Sheldon and Stacy Hein, Battle Lake, MN, requested “an addition being 20’ from the top of bluff facing the lake (Lot 13) and 0 to 7’ from the side of the bluff (being parallel to bluff) Lot 12 and Lot 13. Lot 12 is not a bluff lot from facing the lake.’’ The required setback from the top of bluff is 30’. The applicants are proposing a 10’ by 44’ addition to an existing dwelling with an attached 26’ by 34’ garage. The property is described as Lot 12 and 13, Anderson Beach, Otter Tail Lake in Otter Tail Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was by Cecil Femling, to allow the applicants to withdraw their request. No action was taken on this motion and after additional discussion and consideration the following motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to table this request until the April 2, 1998 meeting so that the applicants would have an opportunity to consider other alternatives. Jeffrey A. and Melody Bober - Denied Jeffrey A. and Melody Bober, Moorhead, MN, requested a variance to construct a dwelling, having a walkout basement, within the bluff impact zone. The structure will be approximately 120’ from the lake. Per the Land and Resource Office the top of the bluff is 125’ from the lake. The required setback from the top of a bluff is 30’. The property is described as Lot 6, Block 1, Pelican Heights Subdivision, Little Pelican Lake in Dunn Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried to deny the variance as requested noting that the Department of Natural Resources assisted with the establishment of the bluff impact zone and noting that other good building sites do exist on the applicants’ property that would not require a variance from the bluff impact zone. Doug Sukut and Dale Hinsverk - Approved Doug Sukut, Wahpeton, ND, and Dale Hinsverk, Wahpeton, ND, requested a variance to “subdivide parcel “B” from parcel “A" and to add parcel “B” to parcel “C” as depicted on the registered surveyor’s drawing on file in the County Auditor’s office. The property is described as part of Government Lot 1, Section 2 of Everts Township by Otter Tail Lake. A letter from Roland R. Mann, Manager of the Otter Tail Water Management District, expressing concerns with the existing sewer systems was read for the record. Clem Hendrickson, Surveyor, appeared along with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with on one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested noting the following: that Parcel “C” cannot have another residential structure, that no other variances will be granted for Parcels “A”, “B” and “C”, that the sewer system use by each dwelling must be brought up to the standards of the Otter Tail Water Management District before the conveyance of Parcel “B” to Parcel “C” and that no substandard lots are being created by the granting of this variance. @002/002AUDUBON ENGIN.0218 439 339104/02/98 11:44 DATE: AprU2,1998 TO: Wi^ne Stein FROM: Jeff Sober In response to our conversation this momingy lam sending this letter requesting that the board please consider a lesser setback. With regards to our meeting on March 26thy the board had mentioned that th^ would consider a variance setback amount of 8~10 feet instead of the 30 feet we had or^naUy requested. At that time, we did not realize that we could change our request or settle for less. However, after recentfy staking out the building site, we realize that even a partial variance would be helpful and appreciated. Also, we are hoping to save an 80 ^100 year old oak tree that would be preserved if given a variance of 8^10 feet Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jeff and M^^ Bober