HomeMy WebLinkAbout17000991331000_Variances_09-11-1997THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
COURTHOUSE. FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 739 - 2271
« * *COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK *** ro
Application Fee ”______
Receipt Number 13.1^ ^ S 7
37J7 ^
PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE
AWh^U’^(7ADDRESS4-
LAKE NAME LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS
r)137fcSECTIONTOWNSHIP RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME H lA
FIRE NUMBER OR LAKE I.D. NUMBER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
^Uc r e, s'fioK y
/ST
li-oa^- - ti’U-aoo
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
2CStructure Setback Structure Size___Sewage System____ Subdivision Cluster Misc.
SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED
uJOui// Jil^ On one
Hit 0^0^j eSls ^ '
^/sUnons >&/ /ino
4frn
/- ^ O/LliJc
/S
^pfiroec ^
a4tc^ 4\i hrs i/f'cuO.
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT
ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPOJ5JSJBILITY TO
CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
9-//- 97
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
42,t C{r(d( fihiJ /-6
1997 6
/336 dU>^
/ 33 J
1333
1334
/ 333:
f 33^
l 337
October 9,
Page 11
4tc /6
oo /
i^<^S-ood
J>C “t/'/hyAccepted By Land & Resource
L & R Official/Date
Date Of Hearing Time
Motion
Prior to the scheduled public hearing the applicant provided notification that he was withdrawing his variance
application.
I
Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment.
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
_____Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No I
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR I
L R Official/Date
bk 0797-001
287.383 • Victor Lundeen Co.. Primers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota
October 9,1997
Page 5
John Donnelly - Withdrawn
John Donnelly, Fargo, ND, requested a variance “to enclose approx. 4’ on one side and 9’ on
the other, underneath the deck as a sunroom. These are the approx, distances that exceed the
string line test between the neighbor’s property. The deck already is within the line test between
the neighbor’s cabins. It’s approx. 62’ back from the lake and will not affect the neighbor’s
view.” The property is described as Lot 2, Pelican Bay Shores First Addition, Fish Lake in Dunn
Township. Prior to the scheduled public hearing the applicant provided notification that he was
withdrawing his variance application.
Paula F. Benson - Approved
Paula F. Benson, Plano, TX, requested a variance of 9’ from the required ordinary high water
level setback of 75’ for an addition to an existing structure 66’ from the ordinary high water level.
The property is described as Lots 1,2 and 3, Evander Beach, Eagle Lake in Eagle Lake
Township. Richard Aasen, Contractor, represented the applicant at the public hearing. The
audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration,
motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried,
to approve a variance of 9’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for an
addition to an existing structure 66’ from the ordinary high water level noting that the proposed
addition will be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure.
Anne Eidsvold - Approved
Anne Eidsvold, Alexandria, MN, requested “a 5’ by 20’ extension on the lakeside (west) of our
cottage. The existing structure is now 97’ back from the high water mark so our request is for a
setback of 92’. We are also requesting the construction of a 2’ by 6’ “bump out” on the north
side of our cottage staying in back of the existing house wall on the lakeside. We are making
this variance request for the following reasons; our cottage living room is very small and by
making these two “bump out” it will add some much needed space to the width and length of our
living room. It also allows us to have more space without doing major reconstruction to the
cottage.” The property is described as Lot 2, Sunset Shores, Clitherall Lake in Nidaros
Township. The audience was polled with Wally Senyk, a neighboring property owner, stating
that the applicant’s variance request would have no negative impact on his property. After
consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Robert Schwartz and carried
with Randall Mann and Cecil Femling voting no and with John Everts abstaining, to approve the
variance as requested with the condition that, except for the existing deck, no other water -
oriented accessory structure will be allow in the future
SCANKED
. V