Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17000991279001_Variances_09-04-1997812044 Office of County Recorder County of Otter Tail I hereby certify that the within instrument was fiied tor record in this office on the - 5rpf A n 19J12___ and was duly Microfilmed as Doc.o-/vX County Recorder .Deputy T THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 « « -X-COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK * * * Application Fee Receipt Number !Q.(q 3 03 LO- PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE cLcAk, ^i4jA,<Y*? > 5^-57(3-ADDRESS ft /?0LAKE NAME LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS SECTION TOWNSHIP /3l RANGE Q TOWNSHIP NAME FIRE NUMBER OR LAKE I.D. NUMBER ~7 O 3^______________________________________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ^ y-//ryAH 7 ^ /V ^ 33' l7'do^~ -/P 77-7^0^ TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback X Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED Cf/ h I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. SIGNATURE OF PROPERT/tOWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) Accepted By Land & Resource L & R Official/Date <1- H -Date Of Hearing Time 3 fm. Motion Motion was made by Randall Mann, seconded by Craig Anderson and carried with John Everts voting no, to deny the variance as requested as the applicant’s proposed development appears to cover more than 25% of the total lot area with impervious surfaces. .c> QJ../C. Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management ______Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No m.R Official/Date Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR bk 0797-001 September 4, 1997 Page 8 David L. Henry - Denied David L. Henry, Pelican Rapids, MN, requested a variance of 1’ from the required lot line setback of 10’, a variance of 65’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 15’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for a 6’ by 28’ addition to an existing dwelling located 35’ from the ordinary high water level (lake) and 9’ from the lot line. The property is described as part of Lot 7, Henry’s Hill, Franklin Lake in Dunn Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, seconded by Craig Anderson and carried with John Everts voting no, to deny the variance as requested as the applicant’s proposed development appears to cover more than 25% of the total lot area with impervious surfaces. Mark McGrath - Approved Mark McGrath, Eagan, MN, requested a variance “to allow existing structure to remain 7’ 10” from lot line. Original survey stakes were in wrong location. All inspections were made and approved during construction. A dispute resulted in a new survey. Setback is currently non conforming.” The required lot line setback is 10’. The property is described as Lot 4, Block 1, Westwood Addition, West Battle Lake in Clitherall Township. The audience was polled with Donald Griwac speaking to the variance request. Letters from Don and Evelyn Griwac and Donald Langren speaking to the variance request were read for the record. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Randall Mann and carried with John Everts abstaining and with George Walter voting no, to approve the variance as requested with the condition that no additional variances will be granted for this property in the future. James and Brenna Lauerman - Tabled James and Brenna Lauerman, Fargo, ND, requested a variance of 22’ from the South property line and a variance of 12’ from the North property line for the construction of a 10’ by 20’ water- oriented accessory structure 18’ from the South property line and 28’ from the North property line. The applicant’s drawing indicates that impervious surfaces will decrease from 42.3% to 36%. The property is described as part of Government Lots 3 and 6, Section 9 of Dunn Township by Pelican Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to table the applicant’s request until the October 2, 1997 meeting to allow the applicant to consider other plans and alternatives that would bring the impervious surface coverage down to at least 25%. Elaine M. Funfar - Denied Elaine M. Funfar, Fargo, ND, requested a variance of approximately 6’ from the required holding tank setback from a structure of 10’ for the location of a detached 24’ by 30’ garage 4’ from the holding tank. The garage will be located 10’ from the side lot line. The property is described as Lot 53, Provan Beach, Pelican Lake in Dunn Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried to deny the variance as requested as adequate area does exist for the legal placement of both the garage and the holding tank. The applicant was granted until June 1, 1998 to place the holding tank and/or garage in a location that meets the setback requirements of the ordinance.