Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17000990749000_Variances_05-07-2009OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #------ was filed/recorded in t for recjjrd on the—IS 2009 at__ r iU /recordingj^ 0 well cert^ate 1056559 1056559 this office __^day of a THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us ky.,T Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date HS^S' <.T- 141^ gTcyg- I ITTLe~~ DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS BALAKE CLASSLAKE NAMELAKE NUMBER Dwa/m TOWNSHIP NAMETOWNSHIPRANGESECTION E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Sl>-llS Co MMY 3!17- fXXTCfinn <-19000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lor j 7^ /niOu^d )leAc>/ TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) X Sewage System ClusterStructure Setback Structure Size Subdivision Misc. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED 7Z> (^/hC4-A^. I TO 7^^ o hujL. ^ fyiQ^ /}AlC/!(rK7y )S JD 4- pArmny JZ) c7U/^ 1^0, ______ /^eTATCH(^ dAKA&hr T2>yr7Z)OL^ I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. / - /!-a 9 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) i.V iS i ^oai! ? 6?Oo9Date Of Hearing Time 7/Dau 7 Motion Darryl and Deb Hirsch - Approved the construction of a 22' by 24’ garage with a condition. (7:50 p.m.) April 9, 2009 Meeting - The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, with the applicant’s verbal permission, to table this request until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicants with an opportunity to consider other alternatives (size and location) that would keep the proposed development out of the shore impact zone and that would limit impervious surface coverage for the proposed development (structure and driveway) to 25 percent or less. It was noted that the applicants already have one structure within the shore impact zone. It was also noted that the applicants’ property is a substandard lot of record, which might not support the development being proposed. May 7, 2009 Meeting - Darryl Hirsch presented two letters of support from Kenneth Erickson and George and Wanda Dutton. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve the construction of a 22’ by 24’ garage 50’ from the ordinary high water and at least 10’ from the side lot line with the condition that no more than 25% of the total lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It should be noted that the variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variance for the proposed development. Hardship/practical difficulty is a substandard lot of record. airman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR f0' bk 0903-001 3t5,694 • Victor Lundeen Co., Primers • Fergus Falls. Minnesoia May 7, 2009 Page # 3 Richard and Maxine Lindberg - Approved the variance application as requested. (7:45 p.m.) Richard and Maxine Lindberg, part of Lot 1 Block 1, Pischke and Taylor First Addition, Spitzer Lake in Leaf Mountain Township, requested the following: Per applicant - new roof on existing cabin and planned 16’ by 24' addition cannot meet 200’ setback. Added by Land and Resource Department - Need variance for 100' setback from lake and 160' setback from lake bed for new roof on existing cabin and proposed 16’ by 24’ addition. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to approve the proposed development as described in the variance application dated April 13, 2009 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. It was noted that the proposed development will be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure and that part of the proposed development will be maintenance to the existing structure. Hardship/practical difficulty is a substandard lot of record. Darryl and Deb Hirsch - Approved the construction of a 22’ by 24’ garage with a condition. (7:50 p.m.) Darryl and Deb Hirsch, Lots 69 and 70 Midland Beach, Little Pelican Lake in Dunn Township, requested a variance of 66' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 5’ from the required lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of a 26’ by 26' garage 34’ from the ordinary high water level and 5' from the south property line. Jeanna, the applicant’s daughter appeared at the public hearing with her father, April 9, 2009 Meeting - The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, with the applicant's verbal permission, to table this request until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicants with an opportunity to consider other alternatives (size and location) that would keep the proposed development out of the shore impact zone and that would limit impervious surface coverage for the proposed development (structure and driveway) to 25 percent or less. It was noted that the applicants already have one structure within the shore impact zone. It was also noted that the applicants' property is a substandard lot of record, which might not support the development being proposed. May 7, 2009 Meeting - Darryl Hirsch presented two letters of support from Kenneth Erickson and George and Wanda Dutton. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve the construction of a 22' by 24' garage 50' from the ordinary high water and at least 10' from the side lot line with the condition that no more than 25% of the total lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It should be noted that the variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variance for the proposed development. Hardship/practical difficulty is a substandard lot of record. Land and Resource Request- Mark Ronning, Land and Resource Department, presented the following application that had been previously heard by the Board of Adjustment on Thursday, September 4, 2008: Robert and Sandra Fagen - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (6:45 p.m.) Robert and Sandra Fagen, part of Government Lot 3, Section 2 of Dead Lake Township by Marion Lake, requested the following: We would like to put a home 24' by 36' with attached garage 16' by 24' and an attached breezeway 10' by 24' on our lot on Marion Lake, Also, relocate our existing 8' by 12' storage shed. We are requesting a variance of a 20' setback from the 75' setback placing new dwelling 55' from ordinary high water level due our substandard lot of record and terrain of lot. Our existing cabin will be removed upon completion of our new dwelling. The proposed new cabin will be 33' farther from the lake than the existing cabin. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as described in the variance application dated July 28'^, 2008 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the application with the condition that the existing cabin must be removed on or before August 1,2009. It was noted that the size of the proposed development is reasonable and that the proposed development will be an improvement to the property. The practical difficulties/hardships are the terrain and configuration of the applicants’ property. Rnood9%7Y'^0 , The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type size (squar,e feet), and location of ail existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high water l^el(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. Tax Parcel Number(s) i r. I s<g - ta' V %i Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) i t <r^l .LJ 3 $I •flIS Hi if✓ f ■u1 o < 9 li o io ml_ Jj£i___fr^ V ^r^/Aww^y 1%_fT^ __fr* __/T-" ___Fr*- 0 <2^ ZF I/ler /Ti fjrHS^iAK Fr*"crf^iev ___ ^NL j^/(P/^£«r uar /h^HrA^fr^ .2i^_f.i-oi$»//O^ X 1^ Lor /f^pA' MT-1& T<7TAI' <iv>AjFj4c*r MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OTTER TAIL COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Thursday, April 9, 2009 The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment met Thursday, April 9, 2009, with the following persons in attendance: Paul Larson Steve Schierer Scott Ellingson, Land and Resource Management Denise Gubrud, Land and Resource Management Chris Stuber, Assistant County Attorney Thomas Lee Rick Wilson Michael Harris Randall Mann Called to Order - Randall Mann Chair called the meeting of the Board of Adjustment to order at 6:30 p.m. Minutes Approved - The Board of Adjustment approved the minutes of the February 5, 2009 meeting as mailed. The Board of Adjustment considered the following applications for variance; Darryl and Deb Hirsch - Tabled (6:31 p.m.) Darryl and Deb Hirsch, Lots 69 and 70 Midland Beach, Little Pelican Lake in Dunn Township, requested a variance of 66’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 5’ from the required lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of a 26’ by 26' garage 34’ from the. ordinary high water level and 5’ from the south property line. Jeanna, the applicant’s daughter appeared at the public hearing with her father. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, with the applicant’s verbal permission, to table this request until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicants with an opportunity to consider other alternatives (size and location) that would keep the proposed development out of the shore impact zone and that would limit impervious surface coverage for the proposed development (structure and driveway) to 25 percent or less. It was noted that the applicants already have one structure within the shore impact zone. It was also noted that the applicants’ property is a substandard lot of record, which might not support the development being proposed. Deborah and John Garner - Approved the application as modified. (6:43 p.m.) Deborah and John Garner, Sub Lot 7 of Government Lot 3, Section 27 of Rush Lake Township by Round Lake, requested the following: This application for variance is an amendment to the variance request approved at the 10/2/08 Board of Adjustment meeting. It is still our intention to demolish and remove the.existent cabin and garage in Area "A” with no variances required. After another survey was completed delineating the Rush Lake Township cart way, the approved variance requests are now only partially accurate for placement of the garage in Area ”C”. The garage will still be placed in the same area as initially proposed, but will now be downsized to 20’ by 40’. Also note the existent road (in yellow) within the designated cart way. We will still accept the approved 3’ variance from the 10’ minimum structure setback on the east lot line, the 13’ variance from the 20’ setback from the cart way on the NW Corner of the garage, and the 12’ at point “D” (on plan); however, we’ve adjusted the other requests as follows: Option 1 - (1) a 20’ variance from the 20’ setback from the cart way on the SW corner of the garage, and (2) a “varying” variance from the 20’ minimum setback of the cart way for the N side of the garage, ranging from 12’ at point “D” (on plan) down to 6’ at point “E” (on plan). Because Option 1 provides for no room between the legal edge of the cart way and the SW corner of the garage, the following second option allows us to move the garage closer to the east lot line. Option 2 - We would still accept the 13’ variance from the 20’ setback from the cart way on the NW corner of the garage, and the 12’ at point “D” (on plan). The variance requests would be adjusted to: (a) a 6’ variance from the 10’ minimum structure setback on the east lot line, (b) a 16’ variance from the 20’ setback from the cart way on the SW corner of the garage, and (c) the requested variance (2) from the above-mentioned Option 1. Katrina L. Wass, Attorney, represented the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Carole Baker expressing concerns with the variance application was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Rick Wilson and unanimously carried, to approve the placement of either a 16’ wide by 40’ long structure or a 20’ wide by 30’ long structure 7’ of the easterly lot line (3’ variance) with the northerly side of the proposed structure in the location as identified on the drawing dated March 9, 2009, which was submitted with the applicants’ variance application. The hardship/practical difficulty is the ingress/egress road which divides the applicants’ property both vertically and horizontally preventing the applicants from enjoying the same rights and privileges as other in this immediate area could enjoy if they decided to construct a storage building on the back portion of there property. J_.1.I 1 R \looo^^onH9ooO Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must Identify the type, size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite Impervious surfaces, road rlght-of-way(s), ordinary high water level(s), septic tank(s), dralnfleld(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also Include all proposed topographical alterations. ; aJuo ^ = a 2,0. sir % Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) Scale I 4 [ 1 m ...•|.t I4c s V1 m:H fiIDe6 .^5^9 2-^it k"T?;L..t_n 7 fm IA:I©m Iti'-r O-\\ i I «sj ‘ >© SA''ij 4- <>r I o1 I40-c •s^fcll! %m I1>'O T-®i o‘Tsi mtzI/I "s;Gis m.IIri b£e-Jt siI- s w.no^oh. m !ii=:/rto§i V,h I ■i?--I #T Ji ,1-1 St ip: w rr :i j. 1signature of Prap'eiiy 'Owner HBK:^0207-329^86. •-.«ctor-LundeenLCo Print - -.1-800-346-4870Fergjs PallS.MNiILI IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): fi:my F|2Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s): A ,Ft2Driveway(s): Patio(s):Ft2 Ft2Sidewalk(s); Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wall(s): Ft2Landscaping; (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: Ft2LOT AREA: /7Vy %X100 = IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE I. / / / V OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #__ was filed/recorded in this office for record on the_2_day of 2006 atll^^^pm Wendy^L^iWetc^ County itecor^r ‘^recording f^ -------------------well certificate 999339 99.9339 THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee iHo;)t6-7 iS'l COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date PROPERTY OWNER F/l/LS'O/ LAKE NUMBER ^io\ LAKE NAME SECTION _________________DAYTIME PHONE \Arf6mhffr' mV um-6~ Pat-/CfrA/ MAILING ADDRESS RDLAKE CLASS Dua/a^I37 ^2-TOWNSHIP NAMERANGETOWNSHIP E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 5^/V/g 6cf Ht/^Y ^ 3/|7 - 000 99 n '1V9 dOO LEGAL DESCRIPTION i-0T~ 70 TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) X-Cluster Misc.Sewage System SubdivisionStructure SizeStructure Setback SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED R^OJsStia/^ />t ^9' (^6Mry A/Ws^ fo&i) VAfU/V/Jc^ [\' (eusJ^ p$er Tv^oiL ^1(0 5tT5 .^~X7AiAJ{^ Qflj AJo^trH !o' X Z(sf AJ 'TV Cp f Ai I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. J S~~ 9~<rc SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) r- Date Of Hearing 0 ^00 ^^:/o /Vr? .\TimeJULrCV*. 0 Motion Daryl and Deb Hirsch - Approved the variance application as requested with conditions. (8:10 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 89’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10’ by 26’ 4” addition IT from the ordinary high water level as described in the variance application dated May 9, 2006 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the following conditions which must be met before a site permit for the addition can be issued 1.) the most northerly existing shed must be removed from the applicants’ property, and 2.) thelO’ by 10’ shed closest to the existing dwelling must be placed in a location to the rear (roadside) of the existing cabin with the condition that it must be placed at least 10’ from the dwelling. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant variances from the required side lot line, septic system or well setback requirements but does grant the variances necessary from the required road right-of- applicants the ability to place the 10’ by 10’ shed between the e dwejitfig and the/(f^ ITshould be^noted that instead of moving the existing 10’ by 10’ shed to theoo|e.te^lace^ew sji^cture in the authorized location, however, that would required to the existiXg>elWel|tfw!^ysy?^^TCmov€a Hardship is a grossly substandard lot of record, the terrain and h water levehsetback toway setback and or^ rear (roadside) authorized lpdation;^he..af)plicants c that the shed do/the un^ue s|^e bfiairm^n/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource ManagementV r? X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No W/)7/00> fSateCopy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR LR Official/ bk 0903-001 3t5,694 • Victor Lundeen Co., Primers • Fergus Falls, Minnesota ... ' Tax parcel Number(s) ................ Drawing must be to scale. Drawing shairidentify projbct and include the setbacks'to all of the'existing'and proposed lotlines', rbadiright-6f-Way(s), ordinary high water level(s), structure(s), septice tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. I' 1 jVRtg - X* Impervious SurfaceScale q\o(^ ]- S 'JqIi -•1-^ i pi i 5.; ^; ^ h :f-:■ ■< £1 c^,„r :i- — ..4 •; \ - ■■<:i r5. . »: t: :i I ■■ i K U j I ; QQ I i t.GSr ■;fQx i ■| ! SFit>o^"lV.'ir®*o I is X;::K■ M t V:i Z■' t t ^iLA D ' j xn? *7t» ? $ . 4y A I£tfriIf iIS-I*Oo I r r';-VTi; y -ii-; !v\■ ■---n> ?■OvQ NT a A.r i PIa"'.4 ■fJs. ^ . /r"t !1 1>> , ..' YPit!' Oi\:m n s Cif- . . I} ■ /rr- ^;a W7A'- ^ ■r ■ :1 ^ i.4:1] ' r !1 - r:-!r^- ■"1I\<v. i................ ■■:f!■ ::1 : -t -H^ \i :c;! .i_..U. i , Signature of Prppert^wner ■ Date'i 322,627 • Victor Lundeen.Co.. Primers ? Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800- 4 ;- j --iBK — 0505 / Break (7:15 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.) Jill Green - Denied. (7:30 p.m.) Jill Green, Lot 5 Block 2 Sportsman’s Landing, Jewett Lake in Elizabeth Township, requested a variance to change lot size to less than 40,000 square feet. The current size of Lot 5 Block 2 is 40,138 square feet. Would like to sell 4,700 square feet to an adjacent property owner and retain as a buildable lot the remaining 35,438 square feet. The 4,700 square foot tract would be permanently attached to the adjacent property owner’s 100’ by 100’ parcel. The audience was polled with Michael Andvik speaking for the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that approval of the variance as requested would create a substandard back lot. Francis and Janice Dehmer - Approved modified building setback with a condition. (7:38 p.m.) Francis and Janice Dehmer, South Half of Lot 3, Sun Rise View Beach, Lake Lida in Lida Township, requested a variance of 25’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the placement of a 40’ by 28’ mobile home 50’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve the placement of the proposed 28’ by 40’ dwelling at a location starting 12’ from the septic tank and extending no more than 40’ towards the ordinary high water level with the condition that the applicants must comply with all other setback requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. James Michael Caliandro—Tabled. (7:50 p.m.) James Michael Caliandro, part of Government Lot 9, Section 25 and part of Government Lot 5, Section 26, Sverdrup Township by North Turtle Lake, requested a variance to subdivide three existing metes and bounds parcels totaling 5.18 acres into two tracts. One tract would contain approximately .250’ of frontage and two acres of area and the other tract would contain approximately 550’ of frontage and 3 acres of area. The minimum size required for metes and founds parcels within the shoreland area is 5 acres and the minimum size required for platted lots within the shoreland area is 200’ of frontage and 80,000 square feet of area. The audience was polled with Jourdan Sullivan speaking in opposition to the variance as requested and expressing concern with the amount of development on natural environment lakes within Otter Tail County. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to table, with the verbal permission of the applicant, this variance hearing until the July 6, 2006 Board of Adjustment meeting to provide the applicant an opportunity to consider the possibility of platting the property. Daryl and Deb Hirsch - Approved the variance application as requested with conditions. (8:10 p.m.) Daryl and Deb Hirsch, Lots 69 and 70, Midland Beach, Little Pelican Lake in Dunn Township, requested a variance of 89’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10’ by 26’ 4” addition to the north side of the existing structure 11 ’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 89’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10’ by 26’ 4” addition IT from the ordinary high water level as described in the variance application dated May 9, 2006 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the following conditions which must be met before a site permit for the addition can be issued 1.) the most northerly existing shed must be removed from the applicants’ property, and 2.) thelO’ by 10’ shed closest to the existing dwelling must be placed in a location to the rear (roadside) of the existing cabin with the condition that it must be placed at least 10’ from the dwelling.1 *; Daryl and Deb Hirsch - Approved the variance application as requested with conditions. (8:10 p.m.) - Continued The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant variances from the required side lot line, septic system or well setback requirements but does grant the variances necessary from the required road right-of-way setback and ordinary high water level setback to enable the applicants the ability to place the 10’ by 10’ shed between the rear (roadside) of the dwelling and the road. It should be noted that instead of moving the existing 10’ by 10’ shed to the authorized location the applicants can choose to place a new structure in the authorized location, however, that would required that the shed closest to the existing dwelling must be removed. Hardship is a grossly substandard lot of record, the terrain and the unique shape of the applicants’ property. Robert and Phyllis Narveson - Approved the variance application as requested. (8:23 p.m.) Robert and Phyllis Narveson, part of Government Lot 5, Section 6 of Girard Township by Blanche Lake, requested a variance of 49’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 12’ by 18’ addition on the southeast side of Cabin Number Nine 5T from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 58’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the addition of a deck to Cabin Number Nine 42’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 49’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of 12’ by 18’ addition on the southeast side of Cabin Number Nine 5T from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 58’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the addition of a deck to Cabin Number Nine 42’ from the ordinary high water level. It was noted that neither of the proposed additions will be any closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing dwelling or deck. Hardship is the terrain of the property. The proposed development to Cabin Number Nine is similar to the use of the other structures in this immediate area. Y&M Properties - Approved the variance application as requested. (8:27 p.m.) Y&M Properties, Lot 1 Block 1 Y and M Properties, Lake Ida in Candor Township, requested a variance of 124’ from the required ordinary high water level/aquatic vegetation setback of 200’ for the placement of a dwelling 76’ from the aquatic vegetation. Robert Maneval represented Y&M Properties at the public hearing. Dennis Craswell, the potential buyer, appeared along with the applicant. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 124’ from the required ordinary high water level/aquatic vegetation setback of 200’ for the placement of a dwelling 76’ from the aquatic vegetation as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. Hardship is a substandard lot of record and the terrain of the applicant’s property. It was noted that the variance as approved will provide a reasonable use of the property and the proposed location is perhaps the best location for the proposed development. It was also noted that the applicant does have a legal site for the placement of a septic system. James and Anne Melville - Tabled. (8:42 p.m.) James and Anne Melville, Lot 27 Fair Oak, West Battle Lake in Girard Township, requested a variance of 20’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the placement of a dwelling 55’ from the ordinary high water level. Andy Pettow, Contractor, appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Letters from Douglas and Karen Wagner, Jim and Lois Ales, David Hansen, Lori and Curtis Johnson, and Dan and Karleen Goodman in support of the variance as requested were read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion to approve the variance as requested with the condition that no more than 25% of the total lot area can be covered with imperious surfaces. The motion failed for lack of a second. mWhfte — Office Yellow - Owner Pink APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM ( Requirements of Shoreland Management Ordinances Otter Tail Coujity, LA\vimnesota— XovNiiishlp ^^4 - y/. ~Last Name Owner:Phone No.First Middle Street & No.City State Zip No. J, /Q>)\Oe:tyu^ Lake Class A)Legal Description: Lake No ^'/r, ^ /Lake Name Sec.VJkTwp.Range Twp. Name. /r);d)c>~^ d 4?e> >0 If applicant is a corporation, what state incorporated in___ Applicant is: (*d^wner ( ) Lessee ( ) Occupant ( ) Agent List Partner's name and address below:Is Applicant a partnership. yes or no NAME, ADDRESS AND ZIP NO.NAME, ADDRESS AND ZIP NO. This application for deviation is from Shoreland Management Ordinance, Otter Tail County, Minnesota for conditonsfound in what Section of the Ordinance:____ EXPLAIN YOUR PROBLEM HERE: c/4> Aa_CL 4M)y 3e>^^ 3 ^ In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as p)ossible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. ^ Sign a t u r e oi*fK p p 11 c ant 19J3LST .XApplication dated. —DO NOT USE SPACE BELOW— A -s7 ^'Is'Date application filed with Shoreland Management Administration. Deviation requires: Planning Commmission approval ( ) Shoreland Management approval only ( ) Both ( ^— Filing acknowledgement By Signature PinDate, time and place of hearing P t. ., 19 15 WITH THE FOLLOWINGDEVIATION APPROVED this_____ (OR ATTACHED) REQUIREMENTS: day of_ljLyy~JL i^i6. LAiSllLioA PrJ~ao Chairman O -A^a Otter Tail Planning Advisory Committlon Signature f^oJcCjcLrn ot-cJLDeviation Approved this cl 19:2.LvM.Malcolrn K, Lee, Shoreland Man^ement Adi^ihi^Stor Otter Tail County, Minnesota day of.• By. MKL-0871 016 171988-A® VICTOR wMoiiN M.. PimrTiao. fkkouo fm4J. mimn. % ■ Addendum to Appliestj.on for Vgriance LOCU f ^ ^ S' C:> UJ > 0 /hSS O ^ !f/^ *^e^lfd ^ r/ Name Address Lake Name Lake No. Is the condition causing the hardship unique to that property? es, explain. 1. Are other residents in the “area enjoying the same privilege as you are requesting on your variance? t f yes, name the residents with that privilege? A 3. Will granting the variance be contrary to the public interest, damaging to the rights of other persons or to property values in the neighborhood? /Ul 62 Are there any objections from the adjoining property owners? ?3 St-%■CC'-' f-yOC-- I certify that the answers to the above statements are true and correct. . Yt Signature R3JJ-0275-047 y'---- _f(J ^ u> h--i- l^illl^gricLequals ^_____ Application for Building Permit Dated. Application for Sewage System Permit Dated Building Permit Number_________________ Applicant agrees that this plot plan is a part of application (s) indicated above. GRID PLOT PLAN SKETCHING FORM.feet/UNMMs.Scale: .19. 19 Sewage System Permit Number. T'1 .19Dated S ign atu rer 1- -T !U4 I ■ii I rv I ‘3 ■'!■ ‘i 'K“-J-Oo oof- I\T I f h r r +** Ij ■-1.' I+I Ui3 J -f --I T TT1 i ■z fe■ /o z «:zIo CD P! u.ttT1oo ar\:z:oi UJJ<O'*If <n1-I t00tnII4uJ><Ii : Lu 1'U 4"*i VU ®I2 fc V)Ti I ZIrI I i z♦-i€1 4.>! ^ I ' I (V) t4 □ t; r- I T T iI 159104-® law *■ •>* FtMl—T -MKL-0871-029 r-t"i- rT I! -----h Scale: '&SMkgrid equals Application for Building Permit Dated_____ Application for Sewage System Permit Dated Building Permit Number_________________ Applicant agrees that this plot plan is a part of application (s) indicated above. 5:.GRID PLOT PLAN SKETCHING FORM-----1-.feet/btef^^ .19 19 Sewage System Permit Number. 2T.19.Dated.OSignatureP i-i 4 o>-4 I oi■I r uJi Q.r- 41 vg_L r era’ r T t :_3i 1 i T I: --4 T :n t- -t I Tf J\U -3 ti =lf“ ^ i- t i‘n frJ > t -• • <*N 4- II 1- 0 f. + +- T3 uJ2 { 1B9104WKL-0871-029 !X 4i Otter Tail County Planning Advisory Commission County Court House Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 June 20, 1975 Mr. Walter K. Olson 2950 W. Owasso St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mr. Olson: This is to inform you that at the June 18, 1975 meeting of the Planning Commission a motion was passed to approve your application for variance as requested provided outdoor biffy is eliminated from property before July 30, 1975. Enclosed find copy of approved variance form. Please be advised that a building permit is required before construction commences from the Land & Resource Management office. Sincerely, Malcolm K. Lee Acting Secretary OTCPAC pda Enc. Otter Tail County Planning Advisory Commission County Court House Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 Meeting of the Otter Tail County Planning Advisory Commission was held on June 18, 1975 at 7:30 p.m. in the Court House, Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537. June 18, 1975 Members present were:Christianson, Kalmstrom, Estes, Ryan, and Delzer. Passed:A motion by Malmstrom, second by Ryan to approve the minutes of the June A, 1975 meeting as published. Voting: All members in favor. A motion by Christianson, second by Delzer to approve the special use application of John Streifel on Little Pelican Lake, 56-761, Sec. 2 of Dunn Twp. subject to no filling beyond west side with a 4 to 1 slope on west and lake sides. Both slopes sodded and remainder of area seeded. Project to be completed by Sept. 1, 1975 subject to filing of final plat plans by developer of Pelican Heights proposed Subdivision. Passed: Voting: All members in favor. Passed:A motion by Christianson, second by Ryan to approve the variance application of Walter Olson on Little Pelican Lake, 56-761, Sec. 2 of Dunn Twp. as requested provided outdoor biffy is eliminated from property before July 30, 1975. Voting: All members in favor. Passed:A motion by Estes, second by Christianson to table the variance application of Haddon Murdock on Spitzer Lake, 56-160, Sec. 20 of Leaf Mountain Twp. for a future meeting. Voting: All members in favor. Passed:A motion by Malmstrom, second by Christianson to deny the special use application of James Grimstad on Franklin Lake, 56-759, Sec. 22 of Dunn Twp. because applicant failed to appear before the Commission. Voting: All members in favor. Passed:A motion by Malmstrom, second by Ryan to approve the variance application of Leland Pearson dated May 30, 1975 on Deer Lake, 56-298, Sec. 7 of Everts Twp. as requested. Voting: All members in favor.