The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17000990444000_Variances_09-08-2005983S88 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #_ was filed/recorded in this office for reco 983888 3rd on.the^/J—day of 2005 aXlLpaml^ar) L.14letcWei by:U b. recording fe^ V- well certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee ----------------- COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date ^ A % ~l/~vSr~ Rof\Z.Rr A> A/^h'P DAYTIME PHONE ~ 3 ^ SJO^ P^A/iTn Aui£. . CIamp A\f) :Joy¥A LAKE NUMBER -54- 7S ^ LAKE NAME F K L / A/ Qua/A/ RANGE PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS Fd.____LAKE CLASS Oi/A/Ay3VTOWNSHIP NAMETOWNSHIPSECTION E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 'FC ! /5 / //n-or,o- qq - Cmhm-CoS LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ist^oda/, t~6 j FoTs* aa/o 0 z' Lot ? TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback X Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED tAiP StPT f' Y (y 0 i! r? / PT ^ APPiT*oAy T iZ A Q ^ (o6 ^e^'x QVAW)U- 0 'V' £ L' £5-1/ I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. FI j! ti I q i' Cjj ^ /SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY Q^WNfeR DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) L-ef^ p~r^/nTimeDate Of Hearing f Motion Robert A and Helen Neff - Approve the variance as requested for the development as depicted on the drawing submitted at the hearing. (7:37 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 35’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of the proposed development as depicted on Mr. Huddelston’s revised drawing 65’ from the ordinary high water level. The Board noted that the variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development. iairmari?Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)SUzrJi}c4mt No L R Official/Olte 'Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0903-001 315,694 • Victor Lundeen Co., Primers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota September 8, 2005 Page # 3 Douglas and Barbara Poush - Approved the variance as modified. (7:08 p.m.) Douglas and Barbara Poush, Lot 24 Nirvana, Stuart Lake in Nidaros Township, requested a variance of 58’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 8’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for an addition to an existing dwelling 42’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and carried with Cecil Femling voting no, to approve a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of an addition to an existing dwelling 50’ from the ordinary high water level. The variance as approved will keep the proposed development out of the shore impact zone. Break - (7:20 pm to 7:30 pm) Ryan Lill - Approved the variance as requested. (7:30 p.m.) Ryan Lill, Lot 5 Wall’s Rivers Lots Second Addition, Ottertail River in Maine Township, requested a variance to have Lot 5 of Wall’s River Lots Second Addition declared a bulldable lot for a 24’ by 52’ single family dwelling with an attached 24’ by 38’ garage. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to declare Lot 5, Wall’s River Lots Second Addition a buildable lot for the construction of a 24' by 52’ single family dwelling with an attached 24’ by 38’ garage. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. The Board noted that the variance as approved will provide the applicant with an ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as others in this immediate area. The Board also noted that declaring this lot a buildable lot does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. Douglas R and Mary B Geesiin - Approved the variance as modified with a condition. (7:33 p.m.) Douglas R and Mary B Geesiin, part of Lots 2 and 3 Clearmont Beach, Otter Tail Lake in Everts Township, requested the following: We are requesting a variance of the north lot line setback. The lot is 39.5’ by 200’. The current cabin is 20’ wide plus 9” roof overhangs. This cabin is not centered on the lot and it is not square within the lot. The current cabin is 3’ to 5’ from that north lot line. Our requested variance of 2’ 6" would allow us to build a new cabin with the foundation 8’ '6" from the north lot line and the roof overhang 7’ 6” from the north lot line. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Bruce and Nancy Monson in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Michael Conlon made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve the proposed development (20’ by 52’ Cabin and 20’ by 12’ Deck) being placed 10’ from the southerly lot line and 9.5’ from the northerly lot line with the condition that the existing 8’ by 8’ storage shed must be placed in a location that complies with the setback requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. The Board noted that the proposed development is an irr^jrovement over the existing development. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. Ik Robtrt A and Helen Neff - Approve the variance as requested for the development as depicted on ^|h^ drawing submitted at the hearing. (7:37 p.m.) Robert A and Helen Neff, Lot 8 and part of Lot 9, Birch Grove First Addition, Franklin Lake in Dunn Township, requested a variance of 35’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a 12’ by 15’ bedroom addition and an 8’ by 8’ entry addition on the east side of the existing dwelling 65’ from the ordinary high water level. Steve Huddelston represented the applicants at the pubic hearing. Mr. Huddelston presented a new drawing which has been placed in the applicants’ file and has been dated September 8, 2005. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. September 8, 2005 .Pj»^,e # 4 ' Robert A and Helen Neff - Approve the variance as requested for the development as depicted on the drawing submitted at the hearing. (7:37 p.m.) - Continued After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 35’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of the proposed development as depicted on Mr. Huddelston’s revised drawing 65’ from the ordinary high water level. The Board noted that the variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development. Wesley and Phyllis Binner-Tabled. (7:45 p.m.) Wesley and Phyllis Binner, Lot 4 Bill Ra Al Acres, Heilberger Lake in Friberg Township, requested the following; 1. variance of septic system (tank, lift, pump station, drain field) within 3’ of northern property line (existing drive), and 2. construction of three-season porch - variance to ordinary high water level (shortest distance southwest corner - inside standards 14’ variance to 100’ ordinary high water level (setback to be 86’). The applicants indicated that after additional review and consideration they would like to change their variance request, instead of being within 3’ of the northern property line they would like to be 0’ and instead of a variance of 14’ from the ordinary high water level they would like a variance of 25’. The audience was polled with John Gerhardson speaking against the variance as requested. The Board informed the applicants that they could not act on the requested changes since these changes require greater variances from the requirements than what was requested in the original application. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to table this application until the October 6, 2005 meeting of the Board of Adjustment and to direct that the applicants provide the office with a revised application no later than 3 p.m. on Thursday, September 15, 2005 and to direct the Secretary of the Board to provide notification of the changed application by the normal notification process. Roger Burris - Approved as requested with a condition. (7:56 p.m.) Roger Burris, Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20 Echo Ranch Riviera 4"^ Addition, Long Lake in Otter Tail Township, requested a variance to subdivide Lots 17, 18, 19, and 20 into two lots. The first proposed lot will be lots 17 and 18 and the second proposed lot will be Lots 19 and 20. The State of Minnesota had combined all four lots as one. We are asking for a variance to subdivide the lots by the historical platted line, which limits the proposed lots in square footage requirement for recreational development. The hardship is substandard lots of record and would resolve the practical difficulty, making the property of reasonable use. The use will be for single family residential use. The minimum size required for platted lots on a recreational development lake is 150’ of water frontage, 150’ of width at the building setback and 40,000 square feet of area. Jim Peterson, Surveyor, appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested with the condition that all structures/buildings must be placed in locations that comply with the setback requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. The Board noted that the proposed lots have the required frontage and the condition placed on the approval will result in a significant improvement to the property.