The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17000340402000_Variances_08-12-2004OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #. 96048B 96Q4SBwas filed/recorded in this office for rec^ on the / K Hay of-----2004 at/^bdo^^jpm well certificate Wen by; t THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE RECEIVEDCOUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us JUL 1 4 2004 LANDS RESOURCE AAo-Application Fee ]hlHo8COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date y PROPERTY OWNER _________ MAILING ADDRESS cQ-D /^ ^ ^ ST Sc) . LAKE NUMBER J^CO LAKE NAME /: AtJ SECTION 3 TOWNSHIP /J* 7 RANGE LV TOWNSHIP NAME a/a/ PARCEL NUMBER DAYTIME PHONE^C^/.$' 7376, /yiDoi'’/'!Mr? /y?/\j -r~s't>______ LAKE CLASS l7m3.‘/m^lnoD E-911 ADDRESS ^(j 3 $ 7 fiil -i-H c i. ./)/ g A^OtirH ‘7^ /"VeT- i-,.2 o/' r'2.u7" 3LEGAL DESCRIPTION CfJ _L , i,'/i//» "5^-2- PoMlIs ^ V » H<AO-Odl /mt ii u €MJJt TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback Structure Size Subdivision ClusterSewage System Misc. X SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BREIF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. /AJC*\J - <3 /0 of c .-yjj 0 7" I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. ^ /aJ— ^ /SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER 'v_y 7' ^-<^3/DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) TUJl -F-/O?TimeDate Of Hearing Motion David Souba - Approved as requested. (8:05 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Cecil Femling made a motion, seconded by Frank Lachowitzer and unanimously carried to approve the variance as requested in the variance application and as depicted on the registered surveyor’s drawing submitted with the application. The Board noted that no additional building sites are being created by the applicant’s proposal. _________________^irmarf/OtterTail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) X No 77Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR LR Official/Date bk 0204-001 317,340 • Victor Lundccn Co., Printers • Fergus Falls, Minnesota JUL 1 4 2004 land & RESOURCE July 9, 2004 Land and Resource Board Otter Tail County Fergus Falls, MN RE; Variance request for lot line adjustment for property on Franklin Lake To whom it may concern; My name is David Souba. I own land and buildings on the east side of Franklin Lake in Otter Tail County. I am. writing for myself and also on behalf of the owner of the lot adjacent to mine, Lloyd Dalen. As a result of several recent surveys Mr. Dalen and I discovered that the boundary between our properties was not where we had believed. While the actual difference is not great, both Mr. Dalen and myself would like to adjust the boundary line to reflect our current use of each of our respective properties. For instance,; to the lakeside, Mr. Dalen owns and utilizes a WOS which, according to the current boundary line, actually lies completely within my lot. Similarly, at the rear of our lots, my bituminous driveway lies approximately 2.3 feet within Mr. Dalen’s lot. I have enclosed a copy of Certificate of Survey jfrom Lake Region Surveying performed on 8-15-01 with a line, highlighted in yellow, showing the new lot line we are requesting. This new boundary would increase the lake frontage of the Dalen lot by approximately 18 feet and increase the roadside width of the Souba lot by approximately 15 feet. The area highlighted in blue would become part of the Dalen lot and the area highlighted in pink would become part of the Souba lot. The Dalen lot is approximately 75 feet at both the lakeside and rear of the lot. The Souba lot is approximately 115 feet at the lakeside, including “parcel B” which was acquired from Bruce and Delores Iserman in March 2002, and 75 feet at the rear of the lot. August 12, 2004 Page U 4 David Souba - Approved as requested. (8:05 p.m.) David Souba, part of Sub Lot 2 of Government Lot 8, Section 34 of Dunn Township by Franklin Lake, requested the following: non-conforming lot size. My name is David Souba. I am writing for myself and on behalf of the owner of the lot adjacent to mine, Lloyd Dalen. Because of several recent surveys, it has been discovered that the boundary between our properties is not where we had believed. While the actual difference is not great, both Mr. Dalen and I would like to adjust the boundary line to reflect our current use of each of our respective properties. For instance, to the lakeside, Mr. Dalen owns and utilizes a Water Oriented Accessory Structure, which, according to the current boundary line, actually lies completely within my lot. Similarly, at the rear of our lots, my bituminous driveway lies approximately 2.3’ within Mr. Dalen’s lot. Enclosed with the applicant’s variance application is a copy of a Certificate of Survey with a line, highlighted in yellow, showing the new lot line we are requesting. This new boundary would increase the lake frontage of the Dalen lot by approximately 18’ and increase the roadside width of the Souba lot by approximately 15’. The area highlighted in blue would become part of the Dalen lot and the area highlighted in pink would become part of the Souba lot. The Dalen lot is approximately 75’ at both the lakeside and rear of the lot. The Souba lot is approximately 115' feet at the lakeside, including Parcel B, which was acquired from Bruce and Delores Iserman in March 2002, and 75’ at the rear of the lot. Randall Mann, Chair, polled the audience with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Cecil Femling made a motion, seconded by Frank Lachowitzer and unanimously carried to approve the variance as requested in the variance application and as depicted on the registered surveyor’s drawing submitted with the application. The Board noted that no additional building sites are being created by the applicant’s proposal. Lyle Cuhel - Denied. (8:13 p.m.) Lyle Cuhel, part of Government Lot 1, Section 15 of Elizabeth Township by Long Lake, requested a variance of 83' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for an addition to an existing dwelling and for a second floor addition over the proposed first floor addition and over the existing dwelling located 17’ from the ordinary high water level. Randall Mann, Chair, polled the audience with Marian Bogenreif expressing concern that the lot might not be large enough to support the proposed development. After consideration and discussion, Cecil Femling made a motion, seconded by Frank Lachowitzer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and there is adequate room to meet the required ordinary high water level setback. Douglas and Mary Geeslin - Approved as modified and with a condition. (8:25 p.m.) Douglas and Mary Geeslin, Lot 11 Sandy Shore Development, Otter Tail Lake in Everts Township, requested the following; The lot is within 1,000 feet of the lake, but it is less than 200’ wide. I request that the lot be declared buildable for residential purposes. Randall Mann, Chair, polled the audience with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Jean Cool and Betty Cook in opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. A letter from Bruce and Nancy Monson in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Cecil Femling made a motion, seconded by Frank Lachowitzer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested. After additional consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, seconded by Frank Lachowitzer and unanimously carried, to declare Lot 11 Sandy Shore Development, as a buildable lot for a non-dwelling structure with the condition that all other setback requirements must be met. ------ • O 1 ^^oireo/W \ 5s. 1 -.V^ 1^rT-i V/'-' /§15s V' ' > - T n7) o /■"' \ -T" _ J. - 1 / (;V J /T i --\ - TTc::dCo mK4oo>A>.2?§H-| -J,cr .Q C5 ^ g i rtn 1 tt I 4 */>! JO ;#> i