HomeMy WebLinkAbout17000310370022_Variances_07-09-1992(SO Office of County rtecoroer ^ /\f1 cH County of Otter Tail (y J
I h»fiby etftSy that (he witWn instrutnwt wM IIW f
application for variance
anj was otily Mtcfoflimad as Doc. # -------f « FROM
Go X/Vuicx^ otter tail county, MINNESOTA
A TT I ? (^tyftocofdof
# lOS'OlS'Receipt No.
Application Fee $Deputy
218-863-8966Frank & EstherKara ,/Wydd/e ^ ^
Rapids 199^
Owner:Phone:
La5f A/ame f/rsf
Pelican 56572RR 4 Box 373 MN
street & No.City State Zip No.'frsc.aicjLizzie RD56-760Lake No.Lake Name Lake Class
Sec. 31 Twp. ^37 42 DunnRangeTwp. Name
Legal Description:P1368Fire No. or Lake ID #
Lot T of Govt. Lot 7 Poss Surv. Lots 31-137-42 Ottertail County, MN.
Parcel Number 17-000-31-0370-022
VARIANCE REQUESTED IS:
To deviate from the restrictions of Part IV Paragraph 13 subparagraph B found on page 24 of
OTC SMO requiring two or more contiguous lots under the same ownership, neither of which meet
the established minimum area or width, and must be considered one parcel for purposes of
conveyance or development. In approximately 1970 I bought Lot T, which is approximately, 60'
in width, and started to develope my lot. In 1977 I bought Lot U, which is approximately
75' in width, and next to Lot T and had a year round home on it. I then moved into the home
on Lot U and since that time I have been trying to sell my home on Lot T. Because I now
have an opportunity, after five years, to finally sell the home on Lot T, I am requesting a
variance to allow the lots to remain seperated. The sale price of Lot T will be $42,500 and
I need these monies to supplement my wifes and my own retirements. I will make the following
statements about the variance requirements: (1) The condition causing this is unique to this
property because these lots were platted before the current standards were established.(2) Granting this variance would be in line with surroudning property owners as their propertie
are substandard lots also. (3) This variance would not be contrary to public interest nor
damage anyone elses rights as this parcel is a dwelling unit as are the other parcels in our
area and has existed as such for a number of years. (4) This variance would not be for a
prohibited use.
In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans,
information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING.
I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail
County. I understand I must contact my township In order to determine whether or not any additional variance and/or permits
are required by the township for my proposed project.
’ signature Of Applicant
June 8 92Application dated 19
7/ ?7. /?Date of hearing:19 . Time:M
MOTION AS FOLLOWS:
Motion W0S mado by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried to table
this variance request until the Board of Adjustment members have an opportunity to discuss
with and receive advice and legal counsel from Wally Senyk, Otter Tail County Attorney.
Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny
the variance as requested with the provision that if legislation, court action or a DNR policy
change, etc. results in an ordinance change or a different interpretation of the existing
ordinance the applicants will be allowed to bring their request back to the board for
reconsideration after proper notification is given with no additional fee being charged to the
applicants.
Chairman
Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment
Permjtfs) from Land & Resource Mana^ment required:
i.-11-^x m)
YES NO
mailed copy of Application to Applicant.(Date/Initial)
MKL — 0483-001
258,371 — Victor Lundeen Co.. Printers. Fergus Falls, Minnesota
'i ' '1; I'C..,
...
S’ 'N ’
‘ j: . !
. "i
'' .
■ ,!!
•?
- 'f
f
Request a variance to allow Lot T and Lot U, which have the same ownership and are
contiguous, to remain as individual lots even though they do not meet the minimum
requirements of the shoreland ordinance and according to the present ordinance are
considered one lot for the purposes of development and conveyance.
V.
.i
\
jr?*
•V.C5\
r^S^q/iU.^ C-ocrk- lo^7 P<^S^
Urs S^cP^ 3/ T!^7 klH^
XOAI
Lo-k k^MK^
I(MA 0(>^r\<s> AtyJ
l/'c/^S
Zo"/" fi\ f^h U i
s
t8xiVj{iPr(L7k O
IA->C ^ If r/
? S /S92
/f/qZ 'in^!
■/» s«s/A
j fiDi
23>^Z4o C5C.^za zy
3i«±ddeJ Twe '?,I IiA Ai2 X >5'2-
„
IH9'K— 2. ip !.z !
SI
A ^ ii'K I
/ s i
i Uj
fl^P ^ J~X) I ^ P ^1^ Z ^Vr
P^7fo£e ^
isx 3 7
I 5Z x34-f r.ot(Se
CO!\ ue^/fACf^'o
ZHk?3QJ
X.
houseVo
>
NA-0
Z za'-t k-2' I V/oo 7“
Caj -XN,OQ•-0
■y /7^'7S >~(,o'----->j<
UtT
4 75'7-X X
)Lo-h V UP ULop- U.i
yVYX
Lfi i(e