The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17000020027001_Variances_09-14-2006100S865 I hereby certify thau this instrument a was filed/recorde^ this office iA^n I /y_recording fee ---------1 well certificate Deputy THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us (90. Application Fee MU ilnloi, V DAYTIME PHONE r?/ ^ Qe./lCoi^ _____ COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number _ Accepted By / Date V(^ O H^i PROPERTY OWNER o .So tMAILING ADDRESS P*i^rC«Ui (^0L \5V7G(LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS Ail?___ TOWNSHIP n-oao- /o?-'OCX) i7^()0O~0^ - 00^7-QO\ SECTION RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME (9++qscny?JPARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS>^rol/^ll Uf I ^ Li) H o/- ^ ^ y*' (isf L~. I I "X-Y 7~i^ Sj.cy /t- ii~c^ t» TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure SizeStructure Setback Sewage System Subdivision Misc.Cluster SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. li\ /4/dr'L*4. J- f / > C/l/c A^cJ ,/La ( , -/-i A't-t-yYK^ S /ca. Ao/i /H o-(! 'h\Y^cM S K.;^=rTiuJ^ A *> I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. SIGNATURE OF PROPf^p^^NER 9//^/^4i u DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notitication As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) ■‘I •V ; , * tr i r I • f;-t i J.'/d /Tm//Time'Date Of Hearing! i. iI :i MotionI I Williarh M BIasczyk - Denied. (9:10 p.m.) ' After.consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the : variance as requested and noting that the granting of the variance as requested would establish a precedence that the Board does not wish to establish. The Board also noted that the applicant does have other alternatives to consider..1 i- I •I ir! C^ff^rmanTbtter Tail County Board of AdjifstmentI .1 4- - I Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)!r Noi i Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNRI-L R Official/Date !'■ i )! I :!;(■ bk 0106-001 V. Lundeen 324855 I September 14, 2006 Page # 4 i John Stumpf- Denied. (8:15 p.m.) John Stumpf, Lot 2 Block 1 Perrin Subdivision, Crystal Lake in. Lida Township, requested the following: we request a variance to leave a deck that was constructed in the bluff impact zone. The deck currently serves as a protective erosion control measure. A letter from Timothy Haugen in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested,and noting that this is an after the.fact request and had the applicant submitted a request prior to the start of the project the Board would not have granted a variance..for the project as currently developed. After V . additional consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made, a motion, second by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to require that the applicant remove, under the direction and supervision of the Land and Resource Department, the deck on or before January 1, 2007. The Board requested that the removal process be directed and supervised by the Land and Resource. Department to^assure that the removal is done in a manner that will protect the bluff and eliminate erosion. ■ .J' ■ Wayne Horgen - Tabled (8:30 p.m.) Wayne Horgen, part of Government Lot 1, Section 30 of Girard Township by West Battle Lake, requested the following: ‘This is a variance request to develop three residential back Ipts vi/ith a reduction in the minimum frontage requirements,for residential back lots. The requirement for residential back lots for a General Development lake is 200 feet of frontage and 40;000 square feet. The request is a reduction for Lot 1 of 100 feet and 2 and 3 is reduction of 150 feet from the required 200 feet.- On proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3, the proposed plan is to have a comrrion shared driveway, for the lots.'.Upon approval for the variance, the applicant will proceed tosubmit to the Otter Jail County Planning Commission to subdivide the lots. Jim Peterson appeared with-the.applicant at the public, hearing.; the audience was polled with Orlo and Barbara Baslington, James Line and Bob Westgaard expressing concerns with the variance as requested. Letters from Glennis Decker-Brosz, Marilyn Eastman, Michael Werner, Robert and Judith Reed and William and James Jedlicka, Rod and Bonnie Nelson and James and Linda Line in opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. An email from Mark Neitzke and Nancy Grossman opposing the. variance as granted was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, with the verbal permission of the applicant, to table this application until the October 5, 2006 Board of Adjustment meeting tp allow the applicants an opportunity to consider other subdivision alternatives. William M BIasczyk- Denied. (9:10 p.m.) William M. Blasczyk, part of Government Lot 13, Section 1 and partof Government Lot 11, Section 2 of Dunn Township by Little Pelican Lake, requested the following: Requirements are for 5 acre minimum lots for metes and bounds standards Jn the shoreland area. I would like a variance to allow for ten smaller lots as indicated on the survey filed with the County Auditor’s office. A total of 10 parcels will be created. These 10 parcels will also have a 1/10 interest in a larger tract. The proposed ten parcels range in size from 1.6 acres to 3.2 acres. The audience was polled with Fred Manuel speaking for the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that the granting of the variance as requested would establish a precedence that the Board does not wishTo establish. The Board also noted that the applicant does have other alternatives to consider.