HomeMy WebLinkAbout18000990255900_Variances_10-09-1997Variances
Barcode 128
9cHs814447 \‘\
Office QT OouRiy Recortfer
County of Otter Tail
I hereby certify that the within Instrument was filed
day offor record in this office on the_.ZD__(Sr-f A.D 19._SX--~.-at/TliSSiM
and was duly Microfilmed 3S Ooci^^47
County Recorder
r#.Deputy
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 739 - 2271
C7^« « «•COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK ***LOApplication Fee
nuifSiReceipt Number
PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE
'TU.g.,, 7^. ~7So73€J'S/ A C'/t ■ADDRESS
LAKE NAME LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS
LekJ'Cc^10SECTION TOWNSHIP ^ RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME 5(0-^FIRE NUMBER OR LAKE I.D. NUMBER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
T5 I3
II
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED {Please Check)
XStructure Setback Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc.
SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED
(\0 0'Tioy^ TO RzY/ST/f^t-
7
he.
//'n^4-/ic L^,/OD
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT
ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO
CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
//// /^Bpr ' ^7
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
/-/o/O
October 9,1997
Page 12
■357
75^
^&c
S(&> ^
^^3 iCw^
Cp6^
Accepted By Land & Resource
L & R Official/Date
9. 97 TimeDate Of Hearing /^O »
Motion
Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Robert Schwartzland unanimously carried, to approve a variance
of 9’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for an addition to an existing structure 66’ from the
ordinary high water level noting that the proposed addition will be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the
existing structure.
, ^ lA/ ^—Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment
ylyO
Permlt(s) required from Land & Resource Management
^ Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR
LR Official/Date
bk 0797-001
2B7.383 * Victor Lundeen Co.. Printers • Fergus Falls, Minnesota
il « MI 0 GRID PLOT PLAN feet SKETCHING FORMScale:grid(s) equals feet, or inch(es) equals
ir'^ of- Sfepr . 19 q7Dated:
Signature
Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake, sideyard and septic tank and drain-
field for each building currently on lot and any proposed structures.
J
S'
%
^ -
i-a-ILc j>»
«
•X ''■» »
-- y:e *
4J•s?
7s
O'
r 3^
o
-c
i
4, ..—
LOT
MKL — 0871 — 029 281.949 • Victor Lundeen Co, Printers • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-BOO-346-4870
,4
<3'f^OCr.<<'•
^October 9,1997
Page 5
John Donnelly - Withdrawn
John Donnelly, Fargo, ND, requested a variance “to enclose approx. 4’ on one side and 9’ on
the other, underneath the deck as:a sunroom. These are the approx, distances that exceed the
string line test between the neighbor’s property. The deck already is within the line test between
the neighbor’s cabins. It’s approx. 62’ back from the lake and will not affect the neighbor’s
view.” The property is described as Lot 2, Pelican Bay Shores First Addition, Fish Lake in Dunn
Township. Priortb the scheduled public hearing the applicant provided notification that he was
withdrawing his variance application.
Paula F. Benson - Approved
Paula F. Benson, Plano, TX, requested a variance of 9’ from the required Ordinary high water
level setback of 75’ for an addition to an existing structure 66’ from the ordinary high water level.
The property is described as Lots 1, 2 and 3, Evander Beach, Eagle Lake in Eagle Lake
Township. Richard Aasen, Contractor, represented the applicant at the public hearing. The
audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration,
motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried,
to approve a variance of 9’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for an
addition to an existing structure 66’ from the ordinary high water level noting that the proposed
addition will be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure.
Anne Eidsvold - Approved
Anne Eidsvold, Alexandria, MN, requested “a 5’ by 20’ extension on the lakeside (west) of our
cottage. The existing structure is now 97’ back from the high water mark so our request is for a
setback of 92’. We are also requesting the construction of a 2’ by 6’ “bump out” on the north
side of our cottage staying in back of the existing house wall on the lakeside. We are making
this variance request for the following reasons: our cottage living room is very small and by
making these two “bump out” it will add some much needed space.to the width and length of our
living room. It also allows us to have more space without doing major reconstruction to the
cottage.” The property is described as Lot 2, Sunset Shores, Clitherall Lake in Nidaros
Township. The audience was polled with Wally Senyk, a neighboring property owner, stating
that the applicant’s variance request would have no negative impact on his property. After
consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Robert Schwartz and carried
with Randall Mann and Cecil Femling voting no and with John Everts abstaining, to approve the
variance as requested with the condition that, except for the existing deck, no other water-
oriented accessory structure will be allow in the future