Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18000080055000_Variances_06-10-2004Variances 2 Barcode 128 oU>\iol2o(y) 956250 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA 956250I hereby certify that this instrument #_ was filed/recorded in this office for record on the /L day of cIUAJ)2004 Recorder __Deputy Wen by: mmn_recording fee _well certificate uL THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us SS/hUD——Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date ^ KOU'OC 0 I I. DAYTIME PHONE ura1 an'\^ 1,‘D__________ U'.WA MAILING ADDRESS ^ 0 \ PROPERTY OWNER ay\e. rv\~\i f\Q.LAKE NUMBER fr(r> \ LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS i fjgc^j! \ 0SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGETOWNSHIP NAME PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS oo 3>^90^ (kruiL^ 1(7o0lA_________ -i-0o^YN5,Vv>.lp Ibl . .AOvYAt^^O;LEGAL DESCRIPTION ■1 AJlCILlWv-- , TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Cluster X Misc.Structure Setback Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BREIF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. VV>- 6oa/xo9 c 1°1AC0 O-^ CX {Vu)u./YY\0>nGuu^ (X AXxvvy^OuLlo- <y\ CWi Qj\G^ lXj2-c3-' VOj^IoJXJLvCA ^iiiXXrvfVNx-f>r^O| -A^-ncOxcAt-nCa -VVJL cJU VXivX. u^Aito cx (2^vw/vp O^Gluvn:^ ^ cifYX^^*3s\oxoi./vXCn C^\jJ\ ^sfVAA^N^ O-'V-C^ »|\XXVvoLo u^O aVx, -AO vjw3 I /r^uJt ^YYXiLiaLAyx,5VLU-( \v^orVl dl- I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE IDAPPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) y (l6Lt^UrKJAte S> r OSO ' oo o ^ O ~CrO O 55 / i 36d^^•3^ ^/Y^-Date Of Hearing TimeID. Motion Karl C and Darlane Miller - Denied. (8:22 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested. The Board noted that the drawing is needed by the Planning Commission to adequately review and plan for the proposed cluster development. The Board also noted that approving the variance as requested would not be consistent with past actions of the Board. Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment : Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L R Official/Date i bk 0204-001 317,340 • Victor Lundeen Co.. Printers • Fergus Falls, Minnesota June 10, 2004 Page # 3 Glenn and Doris Jaakola - Approved the variance as requested. (7:30 p.m.) Glenn and Doris Jaakola, Lot 10 Block 1, Little Pine Estates, Little Pine Lake in Perham Township, requested a variance to have Lot 10 Block 1, Little Pine Estates declared a buildable lot for the purpose of constructing a detached garage which will meet all setback and height requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. Chairman Mann polled the audience with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Michael Conlon and unanimously carried, to declare Lot 10 Block 1, Little Pine Estates as a buildable lot. The Board noted that the variance as approved does not grant directly or indirectly any other variances and is consistent with past actions of the Board. Steve and Jan Nelson - Approved the proposed development with conditions. (7:32 p.m.) Steve and Jan Nelson, Lots 3 and F Inglewood, Blanche Lake in Girard Township, requested a variance to cover more than 25% of the total lot area with impervious surfaces and a variance of 10’ from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the replacement of a portion of an existing structure and for the addition of a second story O' from the side lot line. Chairman Mann polled the audience with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Cecil Femling made a motion, seconded by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve the development as proposed with the condition that no part of the proposed development can be any closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure and with the condition that the average impervious surface coverage between the two lots, that share the driveway, cannot exceed more than 25%. The two properties together cannot exceed 50% impervious surface coverage. The Board noted that the variance as approved does grant the side lot line variance as requested due to the placement of the existing structure. Donald B Meyer Et Al -Tabled. (7:50 p.m.) Donald B Meyer, Et Al, Lots 1, 2 and 3 Block 1, Big Pine Haven, Big Pine Lake in Pine Lake Township, requested the following; to allow the total square foot area of first tier on Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Big Pine Haven to be used for purpose of calculating boat slips for a proposed 8 units planned development verse total square footage less bluff area. (Proposed: Common Interest Community Number 37 - Big Pine Villas) Rick Heinie, property owner and Chris Hyer, Surveyor with Meadowland Surveying, appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. Chairman Mann polled the audience with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. An email from Mike Harder and a letter from Sam Weatherhead opposing the granting of the variance as requested were read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Cecil Femling made a motion, seconded by Joe Maske to deny the variance as requested. After additional discussion and consideration, this motion was withdrawn and Randall Mann made a motion, seconded by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried with the applicants’ verbal approval, to table this variance hearing until the County Board of Commissioners lifts the moratorium for the creation of cluster developments. The Board expressed concerns with how appropriate it might be for the Board to take action on cluster developments during the moratorium and with the possibility of creating a precedence that might not be in harmony with the rules for cluster developments once the moratorium is lifted. Karl C and Dariane Miller - Denied. (8:22 p.m.) r Karl C and Dariane Miller, East Half of the Southeast Quarter, Section 8 of Eagle-Lake-Township by Torgerson Lake, requested the following; we are asking the Board of Adjustment to accept the submitted scale drawing instead of a preliminary plat drawing prepared by a Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor, Civil Engineer or an Architect. We are not planning to make the cluster development into a public campground. We are only allowing our family and a few family friends into the cluster. We inherited the land and want to enjoy its beauty, not make money from it. Chairman Mann polled the audience with Mark Murphy expressing concerns with the proposed development. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested. The Board noted that the drawing is needed by the Planning Commission to adequately review and plan for the proposed cluster development. The Board also noted that approving the variance as requested would not be consistent with past actions of the Board.