Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout29000990772000_Variances_08-03-1995Variances 2 Barcode 128 ^1 Office of County Recorder ^ County Qf, Otter Tail l*nreby cef'.ity that t*-ie within ingrrumer*nreby cer-.ity that t*-ie within it^rument was filed for roc(«fl in'this o'f^f oi; tfiC^!ZL»—ifav ■^SliJSO 6 - ^ - application for variance and^as duly Microi iined as Doc.if "u Vw-^ / ^ OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Owner: /l^>f ■T)L£A^‘- County Reedirder . Deputy La% Name )n^ Receipt No. 7/7 g^7 Application Fee $ ' ^ First Middle / .Phone: Sfafe Lake No. 5^~ Sec. _______Twp. Lake Name —• /53 3^Twp. Name _ Lake Class _ GxkPikh Zip No. Rb Legal Description: ^OAjAOV^itye b— Rfc^fcR-Ot Lot A Fire No. or Lake ID It W ^ / Parcel Number ^'^'Oao-^Sf-oi7<2-ooo VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Application dated 1fl ']fU£4^y.V:.0C^ 7 A/ Signature Of Apaicant /j Date of hearing:19.Time:.M MOTION AS FOLLOWS: Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to table the variance request until the September 7th, 1995, meeting- Permitfs) from Land & Resource Management required:.A Chairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment .YES..NO (Date/Initial) MKL — 0483-001 258,371 — Victor Lundeen Co.. Printers, Fergus Falls, Minnesota mailed copy of Application to Applicant. ^'<1 rci !'€'!■ -^, '^^v4.r~f7oo ji^L L ' ' 1. ■ -i« 'y>i-\^ J a 4 ^ V .:/' / ' X ^'O 7 I-. j .,/4 ff' 7<^S 7^f 770 77/ " <^o ! rKei^ o Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve a 40' variance from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for the placement of a dwelling 60' from the ordinary high water level with the conditions that no variances will be granted for the location of a septic system, the dwelling will be setback at least 20' from the road right-of-way and the dwelling will be setback at least 10' from the side lot lines. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OTTER TAIL COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT October 5th, 1995 The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment met Thursday, October 5th, 1995, with the following persons in attendance: Craig Anderson Leslie Estes John Everts Cecil Femiing Randall Mann George Walter Tim Griep, Land and Resource Management Wally Senyk, County Attorney Call to Order - Ihe meeting was called to order at 6 p.m. by Chairman George Walter. Minutes Approved - September 14th, 1995 The minutes of the September 14th, 1995, meeting were approved with the following addition and amendment: Melva Jean Nyberg (Addition to the September 14th, 1995, minutes) It should he noted that the letter from Wally Senyk, County Attorney, informed the Board of Adjustment members that the applicant's property was a legal lot of record. It was also noted that the granting of a 40' variance allowed the applicant reasonable use of the property and was consistent with the approved structure setback for the adjacent property as noted from the records on file with the Land and Resource Department. The granting of the 40' variance allows the applicant the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as the applicant’s immediate neighbor. Larry and Barbara Phillips (Amendment to the September 14th, 1995, minutes) After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femiing and unanimously carried, to amend the motion of the September 14th, 1995, minutes to read as follows: to approve the construction of an attached garage extending no more than 22' towards the road right-of-way and with the main garage door(s) being parallel to the road. It should be noted that the previously stated requirement of the September 14th, 1995, meeting that the variance was subject to Town Board approval has been removed. It should also be noted that a width for the attached garage was not stated to allow the applicants an opportunity to consider the design of the attached garage for additional area that was lost by the change in the depth of the structure. September 14th, 199S Page 8 Peggy B. Elliott - Tabled Peggy Elliott, St, Paul, UK, requested a variance oi 5' ircun the required 50' setback for the location of a proposed holding tank 45’ from a,n existing well and a varianc eof 14' from the required road right-of-way setback of 20' for the placement of a 4' by 4' well house &’ from the road right-of-way. The properly is described as Lots 10 and 11, Parkdale Beach, Swan Lake in Dane Prairie Township, The applicant requested prior to the meeting that her variance request be tabled until the October 5th, 1935, Board of Adjustment meeting. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to table the variance request until the October 5th, 1995, meeting, Melva Jean Hyberg - Approved Kelva Jean Nyberg, Vining, JIN, requested a variance of 55' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 5’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for the placement of a dwelling 45’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Reserve Lot A, Sunnyside 5th Addition, East Battle Lake in Girard Township, Appearing along with the applicant at the public hearing was Schan Sorkness, Attorney, and Clem Hendrickson, Surveyor, Letters from the following individuals opposing the variance request were read for the record: Craig Frederick, James and Jlona Wheeler and Loretta J, Buchheit. The audience was polled with the following individuals speaking against the variance request: Virginia Eachmann, James Wheeler, Bill Stone, and Ben and Nary Voss, A letter from Wally Senyk, County Attorney, was summarized for the Board by Karen Cooper, Assistant County Attorney. After much consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve a 40' variance from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for the placement of a dwelling 60' from the ordinary high water level with the conditions that no variances will be granted for the location of a septic system, the dwelling will be setback at least 20' from the road right-of-way and the dwelling will be setback at least 10’ from the side lot lines. f August 3rd, 1995 Page 5 Melva Jean Hyberg Tabled Melva Jean Nyberg, Vining, MN, requested a variance of 55' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 5’ from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ for the placement of a dwelling 45’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Reserve Lot A, Sunnyside 5th Addition, East Battle Lake in Girard Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. Prior to the meeting the applicant requested that consideration of her variance application be tabled until the September 7th, 1995, meeting. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to table the variance request until the September 7th, 1995, meeting Francis J. Belcourt - Approved Francis J. Belcourt, Battle Lake, MN, requested a variance to subdivide an existing 22.22 acre parcel into parcels of less than 5 acres as shown on the drawing on file with the County Auditor’s office. In 1986 eleven lots were surveyed out on the north shore of Long Lake (two of which are backlots). Each lot is at least 2.5 acres. Three of the lots were conveyed and recorded prior to the effective date of the new ordinance (June 12th, 1995). The lots which have been sold are identified on the drawing as Lots 3, 4, and 5. The applicant is in the process of selling Lot 6. The Subdivision Controls Ordinance requires that subdivisions created by metes and bounds description, within the shoreland area, must be at least 5 acres in size. The applicant is requesting a variance that would allow the conveyance of the remaining parcel (Lots 1, 2 and 6 through 11 as shown on the drawing) as surveyed in 1986 by metes and bounds descriptions and that each lot would be considered a buildable lot. A road has been constructed to serve the proposed lots and the road is maintained by the township. The property is described as part of Government Lot 4, Section 2 of St. Olaf Township on Long Lake. Mr. Robert Russell, Attorney, appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve the following: 1. ) the recording of the parcel identified as Lot 6, on the above referenced surveyor’s drawing, under the conditions and provisions of the pre June 12th, 1995, Subdivision Controls Ordinance, 2. ) the combination of the parcels identified as Lots 7 and 8, on the above referenced surveyor's drawing, with the conditions that a private easement for the owner(s) of the island can be maintained on the combined Lots 7 and 8 for access purposes and when this tract is conveyed the drawing requirements of the June 12th, 1995, Subdivision Controls Ordinance must be met at the time of recording, and 3.) the conveyance of the parcels identified as Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, and 11, on the above referenced surveyor’s drawing, as separate tracts with the condition that the drawing requirements of the June 12th, 1995, Subdivision Controls Ordinance must be met at the time of recording. It was noted that Lot 6 had been presented for recording on the 13th of June, 1995, and that the document was dated prior to the effective date (June 12th, 1995) of the revised ordinance and that the recording should be permitted since it was very evident that the transaction was in process during the transition to the revised ordinance. It was further noted that many of the other lots were in various stages of being conveyed and with the exception of Lot 7, which must be combined with Lot 8 because of the significant amount of low wet areas, all of the other lots should be allowed to be recorded as individual lots. The timing of the new ordinance and the impact of the ordinance on the Belcourts was given significant consideration by the Board in making their decision. Augst 3rd, 1995 Page 6 David Thomas - Approved David Thomas, Carrollton, MO, requested a variance of 3' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for an 8' by S* addition to an existing dwelling 7' from the side lot line. The property is described as the Westerly 30' of Lot 9, Clearmont Beach, Otter Tail Lake in Everts Township. The audience was polled with Burnett Bordson speaking to the applicant's request. After consideration, motion was made by Leslie Estes, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 3' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for an 8' by 8' addition to an existing dwelling 7' from the side lot line. It was noted that the addition will not be any closer to the lot line than the existing structure. Hardship being a substandard lot of record. Chris Balch - Approved Chris Balch, Rifle, CO, requested a variance of 10' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the constructio.n of a 20' by 24' garage 0' from the side lot line. The property is described as Lot 7, Engstrom Beach 2nd Addition, West McDonald Lake in Edna Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. A letter from Alfred and Lorraine Evert in favor of the applicant's request was read for the record. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of approximately 6' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the placement of the garage approximately 4' from the side lot line at the front corner, a variance of approjcimately 3' from the required side lot line setback for the placement of the garage approximately 7' from the side lot line at the back corner and a variance to allow the placement of the garage 14' from the utility pole. It was noted that the placement of the garage at this location will allow for adequate area to maintain and service the water and septic systems. John H. Moe - Approved John H. Moe, Oakdale, MK, requested a variance of approximately 42' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' and a variance of approximately 4.5' from the required shore impact zone setback of 37.5 for the construction of a 15' by 22' addition to an existing structure 33' from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as part of Government Lot 2, Section 14 of Eagle Lake Township on Eagle Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Leslie Estes, and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of approximately 42' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' and a variance of approximately 4.5' from the required shore impact zone setback of 37.5' for the construction of a 15' by 22' addition to an existing structure approximately 33' from the ordinary high water level. Hardship being a substandard lot of record and the terrain features of the lot as depicted by the retaining wall. Scale: Each grid equals ,5“ /ree^nches GRID PLOT PLAN SKETCHING FORM Dated:19.X-Signature Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake and sideyard for each building currently on lot a9d any proposed structures. AtdJ'iion ^-eser\jc J-^t (earfSec3^ Gn^fhfco To^f\sWp'^ •fXiSTii^G 0.A6INJ AOCiACfMT US' i^ore: Segi-c Tcu>J( artti M7fl^ be ffidueJ Ip eieftt^J oecess^f MKL-0871-029 21598 7@ VICTOn LUNDCCN CO.. PKINTCKS. fCMOUS FALLS. UINN. Notice of Hearing for Variance Otter Tail County Courthouse 121 W. Junius Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 Applicant must be present at the scheduled hearing. To Whom It May Concern: Melva Jean Nyberg P.O. Box 1 Vining, MN 56588 has made application to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment for a variance as per requirements of the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance and/or the Subdivision Controls Ordinance. The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment will assemble for this hearing on August 3rd, 1995, At 7:00 p.m., in the Commissioners' Room of the Otter Tail County Courthouse, Fergus Falls, MN. (Please use the west Law Enforcement entrance.) Individuals requiring special accommodations should contact the County Auditor's office prior to the date of the public hearing. The property concerned in the application is legally described as Reserve Lot A, Sunnyside 5th Addition, Fire # West of #627 Section 36, Township 133, Range 39 - Township Name - Girard Lake No. 56-138, Lake Name - East Battle, Class - RD The variance requested is: a variance of 55' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' and a variance of 5' from the required shore impact zone setback of 50' for the placement of a dwelling 45' from the ordinary high water level. Date: July 14th, 1995 Ld (mtL QJ-'O Board o^Adjustment Secretary vw, Waldemar B. Senyk OTTER TAIL COUNTY ATTORNEY Courthouse Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 (218) 739-2271 FAX (218) 739-3721 Assistants: David J. Hauser Barbara R. Hanson Karen A. Cooper Kurt A. Mortenson Investigator: J. Allan Anderson September 14, 1994 Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Courthouse Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Re: Nyberg application - East Battle Lake Dear Board of Adjustment Members: Your chairman, the venerable George September 14, 1995 meeting, to application of Melva Jean Nyberg for Girard Township, on East Battle Lake town on the evening of September 14. Cooper, who works regularly with Shoreland Management Ordinance, will Walter, asked me to attend your address issues relating to the property located in Section 36 of . Unfortunately, I will be out of Assistant County Attorney Karen the criminal enforcement of our be in attendance at the meeting. Because I am the one who discussed this application with Bill Kalar, Administrator of the Department of Land and Resource Management, I thought that I should write you this letter to express my opinion. As I understand it, the primary legal issue is whether this parcel of property owned by Melva Nyberg is entitled to receive grandfather rights as a lot of record prior to ordinance adoption. Based upon the facts as Bill has presented them to me, I believe we must consider this a lot with full grandfather rights, unless there are restrictions on the subdivision plat which would prevent its use for residential purposes. This outlot is part of a subdivision which was approved prior to the adoption of the first Shoreland Management Ordinance. It was a redrawing of a subdivision which had been recorded prior to the date of the ordinance. However, this subdivision was not recorded until after the Shoreland Management Ordinance was in effect. Nevertheless, it was the policy at that time, which has continued to date, to consider those plats approved prior to the ordinance to be lots of record. In fact, the other lots in this subdivision which are substandard, were considered lots of record and developed with grandfather rights. We cannot deny this parcel the same treatment. This parcel was labeled an "outlot”. In some subdivisions, those were intended to be lots not suitable for residential construction. However, there was nothing in our ordinances which would require an ""VV Wklii Oiler Tail County does not docnminaie on ihe basis of race, color, national origin, sea, religion, age. and handicap status in empioymeni nr the provision of services. otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Page 2 September 14, 1995 outlet to be unbuildable. Therefore, only if the restriction was placed on the plat as part of the approval process could we prevent its use for residential purposes. I have been told that there is no such restriction on this plat. All that having been said, a structure may be erected on a pre­ existing lot with grandfather rights only if a site permit is obtained and all sanitary requirements are complied with. A site permit may not be issued to place a structure in violation of any of the ordinance setback requirements, unless a variance is granted. The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment has ruled on numerous such applications in the past. This is an appropriate circumstance for the application of your collective judgment as to whether this property has unique characteristics which would create a hardship and justify a variance from the ordinance standards. Again, I am sorry that I am not able to be with you. I hope this letter addresses the legal issues raised by this application. If you have further questions, I am confident that Karen will be of assistance to you. Sincerely, fvvcuO Waldemar B. Senyk WBS^mk V. I . RECEIVED CTTZfiTAiLCO.AL’DTOR SEP 6 1995 August 28, 1995 Board of Adjustments c/o Auditor County Court House Fergus Falls, MN RE: Ardan Nyberg property, Vining, Minn. Gentlemen: It has been brought to my attention that the hearing for the variance on the property on East Battle Lake near Vining belonging to Ardan Nyberg has been canceled. The date of the hearing was originally set for the last part of July, then postponed until September 7. We had made plans to attend that hearing in person, since our property adjoins the land in question. Now we have been informed the date is September 14, and we will be unable to attend. However, we plan to have a representative at that meeting. We heartily oppose the variance or any action that would allow a trailer home or a cabin on that small triangle of land. When we purchased our property (Fire #Y627) in February, 1994, we were assured there could not possibly be a structure on that property, since the Lakeshore Management rules did not provide for the allowance in square footage to construct a dwelling. At that time, we were told the minimum was 100 feet from the shoreline and it would not be possible to construct a building following those specifications. Now they tell us Mr. Nyberg only needs 45 feet from shoreline to structure. On the map we were given, the proposed structure will be just 15 feet from our property line, and will greatly distract from the privacy that we had expected to have when we purchased. We were informed that Mr. Nyberg was planning to "grandfather" the lot in. However, all the neighbors along that stretch of land had to comply with the current ordinance, even though they were owned and platted at the same time by Mr. Nyberg. -n I am appealing to you for help. I would like to know what I can do to prevent the unsightly occupying of the property and, if it would be in the form of legal action, I am willing to pursue it. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sinceofely iuchheit LeClaire, Iowa 52753 Also- Route 1, Vining, Minnesota , :! •! : • I ' ;« ' IJ |5cs/tf: ‘Sach ',r\C ||linij:i r ' ' patad:_L _ 1. __ i i I i I ' I ' : I : • I '!i j : I . . » • : ORO p_OT PLAiM sxnciiiNCi I OHM . I • I; 1-----------------------------------. . I , —.-.-T- ■III I I I I !' I I I I I I I{ill 1 I M I I I I II I ' ' ,1 I I I I J ' { I I I I /■ . : (^ I I ;* I t ■I'-ii f [.h:-( : I ; • .1 ■ . I I I ■ II 4 J I i- ■ . I ' .1I. ; 'jy •.111' Y t * ■ ■ •; ^ '• 1 , . . -I . . Stpnatvn \ | | ’ 1 ^Please sk?tch/our'3: in: mtiny tetbacki I'.'om road right-of-way,/ske sndsideyard foreach building currently: j m ' i '■ j \6r. lot aid an/ prepared structures. : • , ; ; S ’ • ■ I j : ! i { ' | M • j';i1. 5^^% s'*' ‘ • = • • H‘|Mi;, Sec rouAsh.>^ • h"' ’^ i i I M I I : I : ' •: 1 I . : i : 1 I ‘ ! • ; 1 I < • i J • * • i * i I :::ii: ; i::'!! i I j iI i • ; ! I I I » \ ' . . ' \• . . I ! • . .« t « ! • : :; I: : I 1 ; ’ ' ' i ;:i!. I I ■. i I v-f If* .‘v.i ! I l i i -I i ' I — 1 » • • • *I ! i: .i I, . I i' i * 1 • ! • I ( ■ I •! i I . ; • • I : • I • J ■ ' ! . : » ' . I • • : ' t I » ! *: .1 • r I ! r M I : { • < ! ;«i :• M ‘ M . t I 4 S . i I • I • • . ! ' • I •: 4 I : I I •’ ‘ • t » I M :N ^ ■ : ' r ■ • 1 ! i i • 1 i I : ; ' . ' , ■ ■ ■ \ • I 1 1 I I I I I I i ; . ■ I ■ : !!':!!'; • ^ ..■”r I ; i ; . i M i : I M • • ; I ;I I • 1 . : . • . • . I I •• • . I I !..Ill' ' I I : -| : ■ I i i ill I I ! * ! •3 'P iiliii Mlii: i , • I 1 ! ^(Sec^i^4>; i ;• I 1 I i ■ j i ' . IJ I i IfXISTiNG O-.^l J 6K] hOaflcr^T ■ Afers": fcfiie. 7M m/%^ Lz •* ^ j I I • • • I I : ; • inf- .© I ' ! I I : !! . t ! i j > 1. I ■ 1 I • r-n t T* *'i iv" *■«# .. . « / k'lA r; L* *t*^*^l.* I W •V-*''’*'' *“ ’V.*' V \£ l • MCB McCarthy-Bush Insurance 4321 E. 60th Street Davenport, Iowa 52807 319-355-6100 • FAX 319-355-1476 iorettaJ.Buchheit .-'CO-LiJL- /UiSLA..-C4~'ny<u^ ^ ^ '-eZtt-' '-£y€uuJ^ ^C-^Oc^jL-ruU *t£''TyL'y/U,^ 0^ • July 24, 1995 Wayne Stein, Board of Adjustment Secretary Otter Tail County Courthouse 121 W. Junius Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 Re: Melva Jean Nyberg application for variance. Gentlemen: I would like to go on record as being very much opposed to your granting a variance for the property described as Reserve Lot A, Sunnyside 5th Addition, Vining, Minnesota. My property lies directly adjacent to the property upon which the variance is requested. At the time I purchased my home it was explained to me by my realtor, Orvis Jibben, that the 45' distance between the lake and my home was allowed only because the foundation had been constructed prior to the establishment of the Shoreland Management requirements of 100' setback, or "grandfathered" in. I was assured that because of those requirements and the rigid enforcement of the rules involving lakeside construction, I would not have to be concerned with anyone trying to squeeze a residence on the triangle of land next door. It distresses me greatly to learn that there are plans to put a building fifteen feet from my property line. I understand the rules were very strictly enforced for other new construction in the area and see no reason for an exception to be made. Jtta J.Fif^e #627 Vining, Minnesota cnsRTWLCO. AucrroR '31)0 21 1995 To the Planning Board If this lot can have a house on it, why did my wife and I have to build 100 feet from the high-water mark? The high-water mark that we were told that we had to use would put this lot under water. Can this lot have a well and a septic system that will meet the requirements of Land Management? The assessor's office told me there are lots in the county suitable for boat docks onlyand they are taxed on a value of from $3500.00 to $7000.00 . This lot has a value of only $1600.00. I If a variance were issued, when the person who buys this lot wants to put a deck or a porch or a garage on it, what happens then? Can you deny the man the right to have a garage? If this lot meets the requirements for a variance, what lot on the lake does not? Respectfully, To whom it may concern: First I would like to convey the thought that no man or government has the right to impede on any other man's dream or the pursuit of wealth or happiness. But keeping this in mind, government should not alter the rules which were set for all to accomodate a single man's quest for wealth, more directly, the case at hand. As it has been explained to me, this committee has the right to make exceptions and extreme variances at one man's request [which is their right] but being a landowner of East Battle Lake lakeshore, I believe I have the right to defend and protect {from pernicious permutation} what is mine. I was led to believe that these variances that were requested would not only put the watershed in possible harm's way, but set a precedent that could be used to further disrupt the natural eco-system of this beautiful lake. In other words, the exceptions made to this one man would not only break the rules that all other lake- shore owners have abided by, but also endangers the lifestyle and environment of the past, present and future East Battle Lake residents. Craig Frederick 7^___%jjp^________________________________- __A^j^jcirn__________:»L'4^, _:2yf__C.^ c3Li __.A^ ■^?<- . > <--4, >"»-<»^^ -cr ^ ( c~ s AqA.^..^ |3_14^5_1 __ .. i>^-<'>'~'-____ _E.L; vi -113 7j_14____St^tKVT i>)kC '>-->Cr \0A^» )33i/7? ___f. g^TTur U/irn^ ^ iUNrAjci; _LL3:L_fl(<?,^U/itir irtc£ iy*i;H L3Ji^0^ jL_3j_____/ 311/ 71____f .,3ffrrkC_ __________________________________.Vi*^i*'*^"* t» __A £. ,fl«»J3i<. .._ 1333, 7? J" 1^33.71 __iAji.7_JJ.3_ I 3.73.7V 3.Zj5mY tfV W!« u < TUC L^U£ OIK^L /f.tfwTnet* ^ut. \tinyusutm£ - i$eg>/zyi' mAit.\i — j333.ro «. <333. 7«/ e. 0& ■ ""^ '■,'~i f ' .- ^ L ' - ' A“it ^ a»i joj^ UJHTOI SuKF«ce , . or tfiST OUTTLt L»K£ 15 O.Ob ' Beiouj T»e OHuiL OF tMTT emne Iahc. PC*. Twe or i. Bttrrut'i "* OHUL V‘>^ ^ If f^An*ne.iT S#lii«C A€m1iJS - ^ Uuu's Lp>/pu)«) — 3, 1.23 ,'. ON l6l7ll<iS rat UfFTtll Suaf/^f OF FAST eAtTU lAKC /S /.aj' gfiaW THC OMNI ■ Sinct TMCM. IS M &CMvfA t>Mr^ MFSTfiFAt^ *F r»e !»*''*'T c««G''f 0€n\(ieo **> tp/2s)<{s - 7^ t- ~ V ' TMC PeUmpNfur Cwucf F.FFOIPS 'S ,IU ONO r^t 4-w ,s omuiu^^i-i JMC ««U4 . «o-« »■•>■ . «js .»») F>ly)lss X 7»4*» m. 'ItFnetKrfr i.uTU iii^UJITVI |#|^ 57RUdTM^ .trhP’"- 1 OTTER TAIL COUNTY Fergus Falls, Minnesota State of Minnesota ) )SS County of Otter Tail) I, Wayne Stein, Secretary for the Board of Adjustment for Otter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that on the 17th, day of July, 1995 the attached Notice of Hearing for Variance was duly served upon the individuals listed below and/or included in the attachment: Melva Jean Myberg, PO Box 1, Vining, MN 56588 Allen Koep, East Battle Lake Assoc., Rt 2 Box 231, Henning, MN 56551 Carol Jacobson, Twp Clerk Girard, Rt 3 Box 82, Battle Lake, MN 56515 Richard West, Otter Tail County Highway Engineer, Courthouse, Fergus Falls, MN Terry Lejcher, DNR 1221 1/2 E. Fir Ave, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 DNR Regional Administrator, 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE, Bemidji, MN 56601 Town Clerk Otter Tail County Public Health Department, Courthouse, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 56537 Board of Adjustment: Craig Anderson, RR, Ottertail, MN 56571 John Everts, Route #2, Battle Lake, MN 56515 Cecil B. Femling, 13 6th St. NE, Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 Randall Mann, 532 N. Ann St., Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Leslie Estes, Box 358, Battle Lake, MN 56515 George Walter, Route #1 Box 31^*, Perham, MN 56573 by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, properly addressed to each of the individuals listed above and/or listed in the attachment. Dated: July 17th, 1995 (l).JUjOu^/flA Secrfvar y y' i. '