Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout29000990670000_Variances_10-07-1999Variances 2 Barcode 128 \D OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify tha^, this instrument # S5362"? was filed/recorded in this office for record on the 13 day of -----------Q_Cii--------1999 at I! \S .. Metcalf,.County Recorder ^— 853627 --------------------well certificate 25 THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 66537 (218) 739-2271 *** COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK 40^Application Fee Receipt Number / 3^ / S 3A)cun«.; fkOl. * JawK)G OlZ-NOC>^f^1=’ PROPERTY OWNER \OOA m. ~l"Lt.A LAKE NAME SECTION 'h’V TOWNSHIP 1~^'5 RANGE PARCEL NUMBER ^ *2.^ OCPO^«(0<S?70000 LtKf&A DAYTIME PHONE ^IZ.-i4-2--^Ct>7S^ M.«oADDRESSOd' n<». LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS TOWNSHIP NAME 6sf \ foorA FIRE/LAKE I.D. NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback >/ Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED \o <^^ccbUsk. (>~ -W S^cie c^I^WL-. Irrve- -fo z:;<jcJjco6er\4 \jc*y\Uyf\c^ SEP 9' 19S9 I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCeSUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. I SIGNATURE OF ^kOPERTY OWNER applicant must be present at the hearing DATE (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) ^jU ^ ^ ^ 0^<f~OOf (f(py (I^7/J ----- <^7J ^7/ ^750>7(^ (^77du^ Accepted By Land & Resource ^ 110/^9 L & R Official/Date 7:3o^999 TimeDate Of Hearing -7 Motion Linda Crowe - Approved Motion was made by John Everts, second by David Holmgren and carried with Randall Mann voting no, to approve a variance of 19’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the placement of a structure 56’ from the ordinary high water level, which would place the proposed structure in line with the closest point of the structure on the lot to the west as shown on the applicant’s drawing. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. The approval of this request will provide the applicant with the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as other in his immediate area. It was also noted that no precedence would be established by the granting of this variance request and that all other setback requirements are being met. The applicant’s representative was also informed that this variance in and of it self does not guarantee that the lot will be buildable because of water, fill and drainage issues that will need to be addressed before a site permit would be issued. It was noted that these issues might require that the applicant or the applicant representative obtain other permits in addition to the site permit. Chaiffnan/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permi^) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 0198-001 291,306 • Victor Lundeen Co., Printers ♦ Fergus Falls. Minnesota October 7,1999 Page 5 Linda Crowe - Approved Linda Crowe, Edina, MN, requested a variance of 19’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' for an ordinary high water level structure setback of 56’. The property is described as Lot 23, Fair Oaks, West Battle Lake in Girard Township. Paul Orndorff represented the applicant at the public hearing. A letter from Marvin L Rapp expressing concerns with the applicant’s request was read for the record. The audience was polled with Dennis Christenson and Tim Matz expressing concerns with how the lot will be developed given the terrain and topography features of the property. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, second by David Holmgren and carried with Randall Mann voting no, to approve a variance of 19’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the placement of a structure 56’ from the ordinary high water level, which would place the proposed structure in line with the closest point of the structure on the lot to the west as shown on the applicant’s drawing. Hardship is a substandard lot of record. The approval of this request will provide the applicant with the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as other in his immediate area. It was also noted that no precedence would be established by the granting of this variance request and that all other setback requirements are being met. The applicant’s representative was also informed that this variance in and of it self does not guarantee that the lot will be buildable because of water, fill and drainage issues that will need to be addressed before a site permit would be issued. It was noted that these issues might require that the applicant or the applicant representative obtain other permits in addition to the site permit. Timothy M. and Jeannie A. Teiken - Denied Timothy M. and Jeannine A. Teiken, Frazee, MN, requested a variance to enclose an existing 8’ by 24’ deck. The existing deck contains an existing 4’ by 8’ by 8’ water accessory structure, which is built on top of the existing 8’ by 24’ deck. The property is described as Lot 1, Sky Blue Water Beach, Lake Six in Hobart Township. A letter from Rollie Canhan in favor of the applicant’s request was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, second by John Everts and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship had been shown unique to the property that would allow for the granting of the requested variance. Sheldon Hein - Denied Sheldon Hein, Battle Lake, MN, requested a variance of 2’ from the 18’ maximum height of a non­ dwelling structure for the construction of a utility building having an overall height of 20’. The property is described as the East 295.5’ of the West 345.15’ of the North 295.5’ of the South 320.15’ of Government Lot 1, Section 29 of Amor Township by Otter Tail Lake. The audience was polled with Hub Hovland speaking against the applicant’s variance request. Letters from Amy Ebersviller, Glen and Pam Davis and Debra L. Dickinson opposing the requested variance were read for the record. The general condition of the applicant’s property and the intended use were the main concerns expressed in the verbal and written communications received by the board. After consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow the granting of the variance as requested. It should be noted that the applicant indicated that the intended purpose of the proposed structure was for the expansion of his business. Since the purpose of the proposed structure is for the expansion of an existing business, within the shoreland area, the applicant’s proposed building project may also fall within the authority of the conditional use application process. \0c^€^ L^v^l \l[c^‘^\j<^^ s <?'C>\ <‘-b'^ norryiCv-l r I VN \o i0 VK ^cfe^r[ l^outiC. 'J'I i >\ ^ "V ■ f 1 CPi^+^<.u»-v-''ev v-ii^e. I?■75.^v^O',I ■ \' \Jca-\c^f\ce^ bci^cJ^ l-'\ r\e- Oco.^ 7ipp.i'j I V /)t^e/il!i^<2|I V^e\\\A 1 7 “~0 i--o\'-Sb "i\I'(J/M A <1 ^ ')-J 6" S'lo\+r lo\0 II Vb iO loI[X 'Z.'l lo P~ \^%,^\ X 7^.0 < ^ k SEP 9’ 1999 a/N 1 /0\I/I f-iire, ^17^ I6> ■I7^. 02-\Ja\f'\unC^ ^^|je6-|- U’-f ^?7 -i^Ai(2- <:7ax.6P^bl » (:>