The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About29000990624000_Variances_06-02-1994Variances 2 Barcode 128 7G2154 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA % ^ ll‘4i>V5Receipt No. Application Fee $ /pi2. - -:>-V32_Phone:Owner:MiddleFirstLast Name j>y _____h/, AsH Zip No.StateStreet S> No _GC>23*?Lake Class ^ t Fn r«=[ Lake NameLake No. 21 21L22 Twp. NameRangeTwp.Sec. Legal Description:Fire No. or Lake ID #,4 Office 0 County of Onar Tail I heraby certify that the within insminwnt was filed hr record In tMs office on the ______day of 19^ at arid was duly Wcrolllmsd as Doc . # * 1/ (7o/V ttv.y: U ■ Cnunty Itorder ^ llj APR I 9 1994 ^ land & RESnnprc j *ZH-c6 (La Jl~o63i^’COCParcel Number Di’i^i.'ty VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: r Jln^/ /o' ^ ^*=*3^i'll\U •-i (X. UdAJ^-euryt>(u_J r. * iIn order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County, t M t 19 . X X'/yrwty r-Application dated Signature Of Applicant 7 . r° M • s-^ ^Time:Date of hearing: _____ MOTION AS FOLLOWS: t ■Motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of approximately 2‘ 6" from the required side lot line setback of 10' for additions to an existing dwelling. The additions will be no closer to the side lot line than the existing structure. a • r,I fChairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Ti„NOYESPermit(s) from Land & Resource Manadiment required: mailed copy of Application to Applicant. (Oate/lnitial) .) MKL 0483-001 . ' t'?5$,371 — Victor Lundeen Co.. Prinlefs. Ferqus^FnHs, Minnesota Scd/e: Each grid equals feet/inches GRID PLOT PLAN SKETCHING FORM ^ AfyfWWZ ~Ffo~L?^P Dated ;19 SignaturePlease sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake and sideyard for each building currently on lot and any proposed structures^ U-hJ/rc, r£>^cLSoui^ Por /Ptisp BATri.0 Pift^ ^ ^7/ ___>N ou.P'p/py' p p!t-{ r>n ppPtBi ^ 27i nou P ci\j2 \poLJ !aJ^ b /^ii5 |Q g e E fl W ^ Jl] APR I 9 1994 tli LAND & RESOURCE I127, h // /H9 /8----- \rI ^ 7 (fi , IptuJ Tldc/ippJ. . {'tPeJ rooyn^'^ j Al I I Y I1 ±z'TK IV < . -y/3 / <z //€ U> J^cjcj / /" / C L ) \J! id <r^ ^oorPy 1^* Jit33>;---- i°!' ---->1 iMKL-0871-029 215987(g) VICTOM CuNftllM 00 .F«CLt. Mil ZT3?7P<3~ ' / &;une 2nd, 1994 ?^a08 2™""i;?■ |Amer antfffSE^el F. Holman - Approved Amer and Mabel F. Holman. Appleton, MN, requested a variance of approximately 2‘6" from the required side lot line setback of 1 O' for additions to an existing dwelling. The property is described as Lot 21, South Point, r West Battle Lake in Girard Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request, After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to || approve a variance of approximately 2' 6" from the required side lot line setback of 1 O' for additions to an ■ existing dwelling. The additions will be no closer to the side lot line than the existing structure. R. Lebahn - Approved IW-Mmm Rick R. Lebahn, West Fargo. ND, requested a variance of approximately 46.5' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75', a variance of approximately 9' from the required shore impact zone setback of 37,5' and a variance of approximately 3' from the required 30' setback from the top of a bluff for the enclosure of an existing deck located approximately 28.5' from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lot 33, Block 3, Lida Shores, Lake Lida in Lida Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Carl Johnson, seconded by Cecil Fern ling and unanimously carried, to approve the enclosure of the existing deck provided the enclosure is no closer to the ordinary high water mark than the existing structure. Hardship being a substandard lot of record. It should also be noted that the applicant does not require a variance from the bluff. - Doug Kottom - Approved Doug Kottom. Battle Lake, MN, r^uested a variance of 16' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' and a variance of 2' from the required side lot line setback of 1 O' for the location of a dwelling 59' from the ordinary high water level and 8' from the side lot line. The property is described as part of Government, \ Lot 4. Section 26 of Everts Township on West Battle Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Carl Johnson, seconded by Cecil Fern ling and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 16' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' and a variance of 2' from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the location of a dwelling 59' from the ordinary high water level and 8' from the side lot line. It should be noted that the design of the applicant's dwelling will not affect the vision of adjacent property owners. Hardship being the unique design of the applicant's structure. Norman and Shirley Long - Denied Norman and Shirley Long, Erhard, MN, requested a variance of 25' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for the location of a dwelling 75' from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as part of Government Lots 8 and 9, Section 10 of Friberg Township on Heilberger Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consicteration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance request as no adequate hardship had been shown. It should be noted that the granting of the variance request would establish a precedent and there ctoes exist reasonable alternatives for the applicants.