The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About29000990462000_Variances_10-06-2005Variances Barcode 128 10-(^-2.005 985770 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #—985770 was filed/recorded in this office for reco^ on. the I j day of 2005 atUm. Metcalf, Gountv Rer^derpmWei DjB^Uty^VG. Aordinq ^ wpII certificme ^ >ie THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095SEP 1 2 ZOOuotter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us LAND & RESOURCE AUG 2 5 2005 LA,\,D kccRECEIVED 22.5coApplication Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date ^ N L vT fVV (- • KiP P-^^YTIIVIE PHONE V W-^sS~3l4 PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS ^ 3 ClX: LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS C ALAKE NAME (33 TOWNSHIP NAMERANGE1TOWNSHIPSECTION E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER -0(00 -q - 0 4L!L-OOQ LEGAL DESCRIPTION L. ^ a /i .n 0 Lo3r K UJ I ^ TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Misc.Subdivision ClusterStructure Size Sewage SystemStructure Setback SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED i-^ -4 i P<XS»-0.<_ UjojJkuiJLl^ OuJw -fct> /VOXVAjtSOVvs JLykjJi. ^ Pcuws-^J^ OUiiUL Ct>Yoc:Aj3aLi pi.^ivsn?dbe; 0-fe^AA*jS oA L-cvyof(L4_^/5t|ijz. /vo- /w^ 0.5jcr^v^ CL.^iXc^ ^ 'AjLAX.'ujcfetl« ^ VveUAS-c;^ AjCINv^^J^ CX^VoU- iVC-TLiLAjiT^^^ CVUoXlSJ^^ ^ (XXKt^ I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) p. /a /^/n.TimeDate Of Hearing Motion Steven L and Jan L Kirchner- Denied. (8:12 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested. Chairman/Otter Tail County Board'of Adjustment^ Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management _ Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No LR Official/Date' ' Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0903-001 315,694 • Vidor Lundeen Co., Primers • Fergus Falls, Minnesota October 6, 2005 Page'#.? Karl and Allen Bjergo - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:55 p.m.) Karl and Allen Bjergo, part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 11 of Aurdal Township by Fish Lake, requested the following; 1.) to subdivide by metes and bounds description a parcel of less than 5 acres (approximately .45 acres), identified as Parcel No. 3 on the drawing submitted with the variance application, from an existing 14.4 acre parcel. This variance is requested in order to provide a recorded description that will match the property that has been occupied by the Nilson family since 1970. The property in which the Nilson’s have a recorded interest is not the property which they have been occupying and if this request is approved deeds of conveyance will be exchanged between the Bjergo and Nilson, and 2.) a variance to subdivide by metes and bounds description a 1.55 acre parcel from an existing 14.33 acre parcel (tax parcel 14.4 acres) as a separate residential buildable lot. Bruce Nilson represented the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Allen Bjergo in support of the application was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and carried with Paul Larson voting no, to approve the variance as requested with the condition that there can be no further subdivision of the remaining property-owned by Karl and Allen Bjergo as stated in the letter submitted by Allen Bjergo. Michael and Janeen Van Vaikenburg - Approved the variance as requested. (8:08 p.m.) Michael and Janeen Van Vaikenburg, Lot 7 Riverview Lane, Otter Tail River in Aurdal Township, requested a variance of 49’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a structure (26’ by 34’ addition) 5T from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 49' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a structure (26’ by 34’ addition) 5T from the ordinary high water level. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants’ property. Robert J and Jo Fedje Keller - Approved the variance as requested. (8:10 p.m.) Robert J and Jo Fedje Keller, part of Government Lot 3, Section 1 of Dora Township by Lake Sybil, requested a variance of 39’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 24’ by 26’ garage 6T from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously earned, to approve a variance of 39' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 24’ by 26’ garage 6T from the ordinary high water level. The proposed development will not restrict or obstruct the view from the adjacent properties. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants' property. Steven L and Jan L Kirchner- Denied. (8:12 p.m.) Steven L and Jan L Kirchner, Lot 11 Weston’s 1st Addition to Fernecliffe, West Battle Lake in Girard Township requested a variance of 13% (25% to 38%) on a substandard size lot to allow the paver walkways and patios to remain as they currently exist. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Letters from Benjamin F Garmer ill and Elizabeth S. K. Garmer expressing concerns with the applicants' request were read for the record. A letter from Marjorie Gibson in opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. A confidential email communication expressing concerns with the variance as requested was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Cecil Femling made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested.