The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About14000990467000_Variances_07-08-2008Variances 2 Barcode 128 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA r;srs;no4i5651041565I was filed/recorcied in this office for record on the ^day of ml\2008 ati^ iordefy Deputy Weni i■ 03 weii certif^te THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us flAp^ T. UlUlOS Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number _ Accepted By / Date (aVi OiffiiA LtMP Q%11 S Cr Orn^HA, K£ Uoi KhO-SlZSe M DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER g^5'-30l2 MAILING ADDRESS 2-M3 &CiLAKE CLASSLAKE NAMELAKE NUMBER HO DE/^D LAK£i_2_b TOWNSHIP NAMERANGETOWNSHIPSECTION 3mi pentE-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER mADbqgi O'Au’l hm LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lo'f 8 of Og ^ £lsi 0U3cvf BcAdLi TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Cluster Misc.Sewage System SubdivisionStructure SizeStructure Setback SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. I M {ooi VAfiAA/ce for bAcK fi'oVIA 'ft g-T'U;y' ftr K)CoO 0<nt Con^^r o-f mth> :jcf6/iok:. I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER^ERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & REGARDING THia^WATTERA^iNAQEME ^RESOURCE, </A SIGNATURE OF WlOl DATEOWNER / AGE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) A:S:i /Vn.3 Alooi'TimeDate Of Hearing Motion William Lind and Lana Ogden - Denied. (6:52 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as request as no adequate hardship and/or practical difficulties unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested or that would prevent the applicants from obtaining a reasonable use of their property. It was noted that there are no terrain or topography issues with the applicant’s lot that would make the placement of the garage in a legal location impossible, that there is adequate room to place the garage in a location that would meet the required 20’ setback from the road right-of-way, that the applicant’s building permit stated that the garage would be 20’ from the road right- of-way, the office was not called after the footing had been placed for an inspection and the only existing hardship is self imposed. It should be noted that the structure must be brought into compliance on or before September 30, 2008. tfterTail County Board of Adjustmeritirman, Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls. Minnesota July 3, 2008 Page # 2 Maurice R. and Heidi J. Schwartz - Approved the variance as requested. (6:42 p.m.) Maurice R. and Heidi J. Schwartz, Lot 34 Block 1 Brightwood Shoreline, Dead Lake in Star Lake Township, requested a variance of. 50.5' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200' in order to replace a 16’ by 24’ garage with a 24’ by 24’ garage 149.5’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Marion Gill made a motion, second by Carl Zick and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 50.5’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the replacement of a 16’ by 24’ garage with a 24’ by 24’ garage 149.5’ from the ordinary high water level as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. It was noted that the proposed development is away from the lake and towards the road. It was also noted that there are other similar structures in this immediate area that are closer to the ordinary high water level. The granting of the variance as requested will provide the applicants with the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as other in this immediate area. Julie M. Larson - Approved the variance as requested. (6:45 p.m.) Julie M. Larson, Lot 2 Block 1 Lakewood Point, Little Pelican Lake in Dunn Township, requested the following: Given this lake lot’s location on a point, a structure setback variance is requested to build west side of a new home 20’ closer to the lake (80’ structure setback rather than 100’) than ordinance requirements. The other sides of the house would meet setback requirements. Brad Larson appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. An email from Danny and Merilee Ottoson in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Carl Zick made a motion, second by Marion Gill and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 20’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of the west side of a new dwelling 80’ from the ordinary high water level as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. It.was noted that the variance as approved will provide the applicant with the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as others in this immediate area and the proposed location does fit the area. William Lind and Lana Ogden - Denied. (6:52 p.m.) ■ William Lind and Lana Ogden, Lot 8 O.C. and Elsie Ewert Beach, Marion Lake in Dead Lake,Township, requested a variance of 4’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a garage 16’ from the road right- of-way. The audience was polled with no bne speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Anton Cichy in support of the variance application was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as request as no adequate hardship and/or practical difficulties unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested, or that would prevent the applicants from obtaining a reasonable use of their property. It was noted that there are no terrain or topography;issues with the applicant’s lot that would make the placement of the garage in a legal location impossible, that there is adequate room to place the garage in a location that would meet the required 20’ setback from the road right-of-way, that the applicant’s building permit stated that the garage would be 20’ from the road right-of-way, the office was not called after the footing had been placed for an inspection and the only existing hardship is self imposed. It should be noted that the structure must be brought into compliance on or before September 30, 2008. I . James K. Bell - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:04 p.m.) James K. Bell, part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter and part Government Lots 1 and 2, Section 29 of Lida Township by Lake Lida, requested the follovving: I have a substandard lake shore, parcel attached to my 123 acres farrn, of which I wish to separate from the farm and attach to separated 5.38 acre parcel - totaling 5.6 acres. The existing water frontage is 65’ which is substandard lake frontage for the 5.6 acre lot. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously.carried,-to approve the proposed subdivision as described in the variance application and as depicted on the drawings submitted , with the variance application with the following conditions: 1.) a registered surveyor’s drawing must be provided at the ; time of conveyance, 2.) the rernaining acres in this 123.21 acre parcel cannot be granted access to the lake over the . - newly created 5.6 acre parcel, and 3.) there can be no structures placed between the dedicated road and the lake (the 65’ wide strip). It should.be noted that development/building'can only occur to the rear of the 65’ wide strip. •• i IIL I1 I 1I SCAliitiimNMQRM !>i060 9^01^^7006___PC iElsie Sj^/rri BfAch Tax Parc^Number(s) ^ The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type, size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high water level(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. //r ^ 20Scale Impervious Surface Ratio KDlLOk aO j (Must Complete Worksheet On Other I !!i[■ !—r jI in-i3 4- IIItIL...> I-1 if J-V>_ nj: Xmi.v:S-:I (k-J-f k I _L.I y)>&I i UL =;-••• II(1 1 A.. 1-U.i Hr-:N.*r HIcv->4)O mlASI >15 1 I I i.. ce> jd,.I J rzl (/Il:II affl1 i_Ii-t t.f ia^4I n 1 m .V Ir::i•T^I IIJ r 't' :i r-L..:ir- f I- ......Fergus Falls.MN •..1-800-346-4870 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): /^77_Ft2Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s): 2^0 0 Ft2Driveway(s): Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s): Ft2Stairway(s): R2Retaining Wall(s): Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 2Z7Z Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 2Z5?0 FPLOT AREA: /(2.0 %X100 = IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE