HomeMy WebLinkAbout14000250201002_Conditional Use Permits_03-10-1999I Conditional Use Pemnits
Barcode 128
10 /r\f\HZ\\
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 739- 2271
*** COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK
Application Fee
Receipt Number
PROPERTY OWNER
Pa.lL/J
E PHONE (oQ
S-^ fLty/. /^(t/[jADDR
SECTION ^ TOWNSHIP RANGE
FIRE NUMBER OR LAKE I.D. NUMBER_________________
LAKE NUMBER ~ LAKE CLASSLAKE NAME
T^JTOWNSHIP NAME
Ta/ :pAruA )L/£?oc3 Zc |oO-2_,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ijo Ac
ki {'ioo^3i^o ZS'I OOD
EXPLAIN YOUR REQUEST
^ d/asyt^y u/* AA
7^ Ccc^^
■*y ^
-/z> a,bs>o^ OO f^/~ jr^
i)onl
t-ki
(liUA\JLlU^ /AM ^\pif
I UNDERSTAND THAT APPROVAL OF THIS REDUEST APPLIES TO THE USE OF THE LAND.%u.;
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MA\ BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO
CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
2.-S-- 99
ATURE OF PROPERTY OW DATE
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
A
!
;
Accepted By Land & Resource
L & R Official/Date
1TimeDate Of Planning Commission Hearing
Planning Commission Motion
MARCH 10.1999
Motion: A motion by Estes, second by Schwartz to table (with the Applicant’s approval)
to allow an EAW be prepared; reasons being: 1. The public’s concern!regarding the
wetlands and wildlife habitat. 2. Potential for erosion. 3. Too many lots are proposed for
this area. 4. The crowding potential for a small (45 acre) lake.
MAY 12.1999
Motion: A motion by Sha, second by Maske to approve provided an Engineers plan
(including an erosion control plan) is provided, and the same engineer that designs the
road must oversee the project through conclusion. This plan is to be reviewed and
approved by Land & Resource. The developer must obtain the proper permits from the
MPCA. This approval is subject to the representations on the revised rtiap received May
3, 1999.
Chairman/Otter Tail County Planning Commission
County Board Action 3/16/99 - Moticn by lindquist, seoxd by FcDenminj and carri^ to direct this request
buck to the Planning Catmissicn for the pjrpoee of anducting an EfiW needs detentdnaticn.
____Approved As Recommended 5/18/99 - Nbticn by Nelscn, seocnd by Lindqui^, and unanirrcusly
carried to approve a Ctnditicnal bfee Ffermit to onstruct a road cn
Alice lake (Sec. 25 S. 36/ TVp. 135, R.40, Eteadlake IbMndnip, La]«'
#564244) with ocnditicns as recamended by the Planning Oonmissiai
and subject to the cotplete ratoval of the old garbage sites.
Denied As Recommended
\/^ Othei
i.Chairm^/Ot^er Tail |iounW Board of Commissioners Date of Final Action
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #
L & R Official/Date
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)No
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And MN DNR
I,L & R Official/Date
bk 0797-006
287.384 • Victor Lundoen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota
I
.C-
Department of
LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
Phone: (218) 739-2271
Court House
FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA 56537
Junes, 1999
Larry Stoller
291 Palomino Dr
St Paul, MN 55124
RE: Conditional Use Permit, May 18,1999 County Board Meeting, Lake Alice (56-244)
Dear Mr. & Ms. Brakke:
On May 12,1999, the Planning Commission passed a motion (see enclosed copy of your
Application) to approve your Conditional Use Application request with conditions, this
recommendation was approved by the County Board of Commissioners (see enclosed copy
of the Minutes) on May 18,1999.
Once you have met the requirements of the approval (and provide verification to our Office),
we can process the Conditional Use Permit.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our Office.
Sincerely,
Marsha Bowman
Office Manager
Duane Donley, RR1 Box 159, Richville, MN 56576
i
Department of
LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
121 W. Junius Ave., Suite 130
Fergus Falls, MN 56537
Ph: 218-739-2271 Ext. 225
Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us
August 8, 2002
Gary Van Watermulen
42802 State Hwy 108
Perham MN 56573-8948
RE: After-the-Fact Grade 85 Fill Permit #3231, Brad Paumen Property, PT GL 6
Sections 25/36 Dead Lake Township, Lake Alice (56-244)
Dear Mr. Van Watermulen,
Mr. Paumen indicated that you were hired to haul in %” rock on his existing
boat ramp road.
After consideration our office issued an After-the-Fact Grade 8s Fill Permit
($300.00 fee) to Mr. Pauman.
It is the policy of the Otter Tail County Land 85 Resource Management Office
to give contractors only one warning when they are in violation of the Shoreland
Management Ordinance. This letter will serve as your warning. Any future
violations will result in the violation being charged through the County Attorney’s
Office.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Tim Griep
Assistant Administrator
TG/jlt
& FILE MEMO PUii^HAS<:^s i STt^ilc^
PROPERTY OWNER Q^t^/oriPARCEL # \N POO 3^ n"l
(mC^IVER/WETLAND NAME
&
Date L&R Official
Action/Comments
(L ^y
1 -c.'r'v
*AviA.^/r xp..> v^4*
■>.■#..«'*-g..^v,V
Jf^...,>j* I- . .-•fe~TV,r; ...T-V' » »>'^I ^J^‘jg^«r-I <r/ "aI--.
f X'- C^T
'T‘ r"'i ,' 7 ,. Qy /hpU^-.
- <*} < i >-'•X
^ Uj '• aTi yr^<J-__J- V^-, V*
J ^ JP..q
i f
■^f/“<- » •
^LAA-<i*y<*f/^~yT z'- •ri
Date L&R Official
Action/Comments
Date L&R Official
Action/Comments
L&R OfficialDate
Action/Comments.
Date L&R Official
Action/Comments.
Date L&R OfTicial
Action/Comments
L&R OfficialDate
Action/Comments
“Lake^hore Land North of the Stress Liner
Steve Hyland
302 Siimniit Avc.
Si. P:u)], Minnesota 55102
office: 651/293-0657
five: 651/290-7686
Larry M. StoUer
291 Palomino Dr.
St. P;iul, Minnesota 55124
office: 612/406-8537
fax: 612/4068538
RECEIVEDMarch 14. 2000
MAR 1 7 2000Co jntv of Otter Tail
Depar; merit of Land and Resource Management
raiudiouse
Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56"'3 7
LAND & RESOURCE
Attention. Biil 6alar
Dear Bdl,
As you and 1 discussed this afternoon, we are faced with the May 18 expiration ot our
Conditional Use Permit on Lake Alice. Regretably, we spent the spring and summer
months in securing that CUP approval, plus additional weeks awaiting road engineering
data and the additional surveying associated with that work. As we entered the lall
market, the four.local road contractors from whom we had requested estimates r/ere too
busy with other projects to provide those bids
We have only witnin the pa.st thirty days received a bid on the road construction, (n over
thirty years in tins business we have not had a requirement for an engineered road, and
have discovered that cost to be more than twice the estimate for a contracted road.
Conseqiienllv, we must make some very difficult marketing decisions and only now begin
maiketing this piopatty in earnest with full knowledge of its costs This is the basis on
which we hereby are requesting the extension of our CL'P.
If you miay have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or my partner, Steve
Hyland, 1-2^3-0657, at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration.
Siiioere'y,
• . >«• »"atbOl Stoller
•'-■'•V r-'C,;
North American Lakes & Land, LLC
291 Palomino Dr., St. Paul, Minnesota 55124
www.northamericanllc.com
Department of
LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
Phone: (218) 739-22 71
Court House
FERGUS FALLS. MINNESOTA 56537
received
MAR 1 7 2000
lands resource
June 8, 1999
Larry Stoller
291 Palomino Dr
St Paul, MN 55124
RE: Conditional Use Permit, May 18,1999 County Board Meeting, Lake Alice (56-244)
--Bear-Mfr& Mo.-Brakke;—
On May 12,1999, the Planning Commission passed a motion (see enclosed copy of your
Application) to approve your Conditional Use Application request with conditions, this
recommendation was approved by the County Board of Commissioners (see enclosed copy
of the Minutes) on May 18,1999,
Once you have met the requirements of the approval (and provide verification to our Office),
we can process the Conditional Use Permit.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our Office.
Sincerely
Marsha Bowman
Office Manager
Duane Donley, RR1 Box 159, Richville, MN 56576
I ,
RECEIVED
otter Tail County Board of Commissioners
May 18, 1999
Page 2
road between Oscar Township and Akron Township is equitable as currently^1dnds'afi8^should
remain the same.
MAR 1 7 2000
Motion by LeeA second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried that the cost of maintenance for this
one-mile stretch of^read should be shared equitably between Oscar Township and Akron
Township. Additionally, the motion directed the County Attorney to send a letter to Oscar
Township relative to the issue.
Planning Commission Recommendations
Conditional Use Permit - Roper & Toni Brakke:
Motion by Portmann, second by Lee, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use
Permit for an earthmoving project as presented, not requiring an engineer’s plan, subject to the
completion of the purchase of property to the west as conditioned and recommended by the
Planning Commission. The CUP is for property on Lake Lizzie (Sec. 20, Twp. 137, R. 42, Dunn
Township - Lake #760).
Conditional Use Permit - Duane Donlev/Larrv Stollen *■
Land & Resource Director, Bill Kalar, introduced discussion regarding the request for a Conditional
Use Permit for Duane Donley/Larry Stoller as presented on the revised map dated May 3, 1999.
Attorney Bob Russell, representing the applicants, reviewed the history of the CUP application.
The application request was tabled by the Planning Commission, referred for an EAW, an EAW
needs determination hearing was held and an EAW was determined not to be necessary since
potential environmental impacts could be mitigated or reversed by an erosion control plan. The
County Board approved the recommendation regarding the EAW needs determination and turned
the CUP request back to the Planning Commission for consideration. Mr. Russell stated that the
developer has no problem with obtaining the proper MPCA permits, however, feel that they can
meet all county criteria without an engineer’s plan. He requested that the condition requiring the
engineer’s plan be removed by the County Board because it is cost prohibitive and the project may
not be able to move forward. The applicant and surveyor spoke on the same issue.
Elizabeth Maxwell, property owner near the proposed development, spoke in opposition of the
project and read a letter for the record regarding environmental issues she felt had not been
considered.
Commissioner Lindquist stated that an EAW study was completed to address environmental
issues. An engineer on the project allows a registered, licensed individual to be responsible and
liable in case there are any problems.
Motion by Nelson, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use
Permit to construct a road on Alice Lake (Sec. 25 & 36, Twp. 135, R. 40, Dead Lake Township,
Lake #56-244) with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission and subject to the
complete removal of the old garbage sites.
Conditional Use Permit - Kenneth & Evsivn Beauchamp:
Motion by Nelson, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use
Permit to allow a boat access on Lake Marion (Sec. 12, Twp, 135, R. 40, Dead Lake Township,
Lake #56-243) with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Preliminary Plat - "Pine Island Estates'VSteve & Denise Zimmerman:
Bill Kalar noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat with
changes.
otter Tail County Board of Commissioners
May 18, 1999
Page 2
road between Oscar Township and Akron Township is equitable as currently stands and should
remain the same.
Motion by Lee^sec^d by Lindquist, and unanimously carried that the cost of maintenance for this
one-mile stretch of^fSad should be shared equitably between Oscar Township and Akron
Township. Additionally, the motion directed the County Attorney to send a letter to Oscar
Township relative to the issue.
Planning Commission Recommendations
Conditional Use Permit - Roger & Toni Brakke:
Motion by Portmann, second by Lee, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use
Permit for an earthmoving project as presented, not requiring an engineer’s plan, subject to the
completion of the purchase of property to the west as conditioned and recommended by the
Planning Commission. The CUP is for property on Lake Lizzie (Sec. 20, Twp. 137, R. 42, Dunn
Township - Lake #760).
Conditional Use Permit - Duane Donlev/Larr/ Stoller:
Land & Resource Director, Bill Kalar, introduced discussion regarding the request for a Conditional
Use Permit for Duane Donley/Larry Stoller as presented on the revised map dated May 3, 1999.
Attorney Bob Russell, representing the applicants, reviewed the history of the CUP application.
The application request was tabled by the Planning Commission, referred for an EAW, an EAW
needs determination hearing was held and an EAW was determined not to be necessary since
potential environmental impacts could be mitigated or reversed by an erosion control plan. The
County Board approved the recommendation regarding the EAW needs determination and turned
the CUP request back to the Planning Commission for consideration. Mr. Russell stated that the
developer has no problem with obtaining the proper MPCA permits, however, feel that they can
meet all county criteria without an engineer’s plan. He requested that the condition requiring the
engineer’s plan be removed by the County Board because it is cost prohibitive and the project may
not be able to move forward. The applicant and surveyor spoke on the same issue.
Elizabeth Maxwell, property owner near the proposed development, spoke in opposition of the
project and read a letter for the record regarding environmental issues she felt had not been
considered.
Commissioner Lindquist stated that an EAW study was completed to address environmental
issues. An engineer on the project allows a registered, licensed individual to be responsible and
liable in case there are any problems.
Motion by Nelson, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use
Permit to construct a road on Alice Lake (Sec. 25 & 36, Twp. 135, R. 40, Dead Lake Township,
Lake #56-244) with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission and subject to the
complete removal of the old garbage sites.
Conditional Use Permit - Kenneth & Evelyn Beauchamp:
Motion by Nelson, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use
Permit to allow a boat access on Lake Marion (Sec. 12, Twp, 135, R. 40, Dead Lake Township,
Lake #56-243) with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Preliminary Plat - ‘‘Pine Island Estates’VSteve & Denise Zimmerman:
Bill Kalar noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat with
changes.
Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners
March 16, 1999
Page 3
f Qof^itional Use Permit - Duane Donlev/Larrv Stoller:
^Land & Resource Director, Bill Kalar invited the applicants to address issues regarding this
Conditional Use Permit application. Attorney, Bob Russell introduced developers Steve Hyland
and Larrry Stoller and spoke on their behalf. Mr. Russell explained that his clients attended a
Planning Commission meeting to obtain a CUP to construct a road in Dead Lake Township near
Lake Alice. He presented a diagram of the road. The proposed lots are in excess of the 5-acre
minimum requirement and minimum lake frontage of 212 feet as required in the SCO. The CUP
request is for the proposed road only. The road is not going to be constructed where the current
pathway is located and it is designed to fully comply with county specifications. Mr. Russell
indicated that his clients, at the Planning Commission meeting, understood the matter would not be
passed and in fact, that the Planning Commission would recommend against granting a permit
unless there was an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) completed. Therefore, his
clients agreed to table the motion. Mr. Russell requested that the County Board proceed and issue
the CUP for the construction of the road and not require an EAW as recommended by the Planning
■ Commission.
Land & Resource Director, Bill Kalar stated that his staff, who attended the meeting, indicated that
the intent of the Planning Commission was to recommend an EAW needs determination at this
point, not that an EAW be completed. The EAW needs determination would determine whether
there is significant environmental impact to require an EAW study. Applicant, Larry Stoller,
requested the process required by an EAW needs determination. Mr. Kalar explained the process.
County Attorney, David Hauser stated that the Planning Commission is looking for more
information and the Planning Commission has the authority to implement an EAW process without
a petition.
Motion by Lindquist, second by Froemming to direct this request for a CUP back to the Planning
Commission for the purpose of conducting an EAW needs determination (sec 25 & 36, twp. 135,
R. 40, 56-244, Dead Lake Township).
Discussion followed. Property owner, Peggy Maxwell, expressed opposition to the project.
Chairman Nelson called for a vote. Motion passed with Portmann opposed.
Conditional Use Permit - Walter & Nancy Jehs:
Motion by Lee, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit
to shore up the NE corner of their home on Pelican Lake (Sec. 11, Twp. 137, R43, 56-786,
Scambler Township) with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Conditional Use Permit - Robert & Julie Budke:
Motion by Portmann, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use
Permit to add up to 2 additional apartments to an existing structure on Unnamed Lake (Sec. 16,
Twp. 132, R.43, 56-835, Buse Township) as presented.
Conditional Use Permit - Glen A. Noyes:
Motion by Lindquist, second by Lee, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit
to construct a roadway on Indian Lake (Sec. 21, Twp. 132, R. 42, Dane Prairie Township) as
presented.
Planning Commission
March 10, 1999Page Z* '
Motion:
Application/Preliminary Plat until the EAW can be completed, as requested by the
Applicant.
A motion by Trites, second by Estes to table the Conditional Use
Voting: All members in favor.
Otter Tail Co. Highway Dept. - Approved With A Condition:
A Conditional Use Permit Application stating; Project No. S.A.P. 56-682-05;
Reconstruction of CSAH No. 82 from TH 210 to I-94. This 4.7 mile segment of CSAH
NO. 82 was originally graded and surfaced as State Highway No. 59. The existing
highway is deficient in vertical alignment and structure. The proposed project will be
constructed to current MN/DOT State-Aid Standards and will provide a safer and more
efficient highway. Wetland mitigation is in process. Detailed project plans are available
at the Otter Tail County Highway Dept. The property is described as follows; From Jet.
TH 210 & CSAH No. 82 in the SW1/4 of Section 2, Buse Twp SELY along CSAH No. 82
to the 1-94 W bound on-off ramp in the SW1/4 of Section 30 of Dane Prairie Twp;
Unnamed Lake (56-830), NE; Unnamed Lake (56-832), NE; Unnamed Lake (56-848),
NE; Unnamed Lake (56-849), GD.
Rick West (OTC Highway Engineer) represented the Application.
Ron Starky had questions regarding the Wetland Mitigation. Craig Hanson had questions
regarding the impact on the Unnamed Lake.
Motion: A motion by Sha, second by Estes to approve as presented, subject to approval
through the Wetland Conservation Act.
Voting: All members in favor.
Duane Donlev/Larrv Stolier-Tabled For An EAW:
A Conditional Use Permit Application for road approval. We at the North American Lakes
and Land, LLC (Larry Stolier), are the prospective owners of the subject property.
Subject to our closing with the Donleys at the end of December. We would like to
construct about 3,800 feet of road constructed to County and Township Specifications.
The property is described as Pt Gov. Lot 6, Section 25 (40.73 Ac) & NE1/4 NE1/4,
Section 36 (40 Ac) in Dead Lake Township; Lake Alice (56-244), NE.
Larry Stolier, Steve Highland & Terry Anderson (surveyor) represented the Application.
Peggy Maxwell indicated the road had been shown on maps & has been used for a long
time by area residents & that the lake is fragile and can not handle 200’ lots. Duane
Bohne (Townboard Supervisor) expressed concerns regarding the type of (what kind of
gravel, tar, etc.) road is proposed. Paul Buendiger expressed concerns regarding the
environmental impact this project would have on the wildlife (eagles, loons, etc.) & the
lake.
Break: The Commission took a 10 minute break at 7:50 to allow the County Attorney
time to review the process regarding the initiation of an EAW.
* Motion: A motion by Estes, second by Schwartz to table (with the Applicant’s approval)
to allow an EAW be prepared; reasons being: 1. The public’s concern regarding the
wetlands and wildlife habitat. 2. Potential for erosion. 3. Too many lots are proposed for
this area. 4. The crowding potential for a small (45 acre) lake.
Voting: All members in favor.
C(S>
LAKE ALICE
OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MN
LAKE FRONTAGESIZE f ACRES^PARCEI.
9155.01A
2145.07B
575C 5.02
4165.3D
2397.38E
2126.22F
2305.92G
2125.37H
NORTH AMERICAN LAKES AND LAND, LLC
888-580-8957
:
OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION !
^11
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICANT: Duane Donley
RRl Box 159
Richville,- MN 56576
Larry Stoller (Purchaser)
291 Palomino Dr
St. Paul, MN 55124
HEARING DATE/LOCATION: March 10, 1999 at 7:00 P.M.
Commissioner's Room
Otter Tall County Courthouse
Fergus Falls, MN 56537
A Conditional '
We at the North American
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (AS STATED ON THE APPLICATION) :
Use Permit Application for road approval.
Lakes and Land, LLC (Larry Stoller), are the prospective owners of
the subject property,
the end of December.
Subject" to our closing with the Donleys at
We would'like to construct about 3,800 feet of
road constructed to County and Township Specifications. ,
LAKE NAME/NUMBER/CLASS: Lake Alice (56-244), NE
FIRE NUMBER: N/A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt Gov Lot 6,, Section 25 (40.73 Ac) & NEl/4
NEl/4, Section 36 (40 Ac) in Dead Lake.Township
The above Applicant has made Application to the Otter Tail. County
Planning Commission for a Conditional'. Use Permit as per the
/ requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail
County. Details of the Application are available for viewing at the-
Land & Resource Management Office, Courthouse, Fergus Falls, MN
56537. Any comments regarding this request may be expressed at the
Hearing or forwarded to the Land & Resource Management Office.
INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS SHOULD CONTACT THE LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HEARING’.
Bert Olson February 24, 1999
Chairman Planning Commission Mailing Date
March 8, 1999
Dear Planning Commission;
This letter is in response to the Notice of Public Hearing for applicant Duane and Marion
Donley and Larry Stoller for a Conditional Use Permit for road approval.
We, the undersigned residents living near Lake Alice, are concerned about the
environmental impact of the proposed development on the south shore of the lake. We
believe it is a sensitive area due to the following reasons;
1. The area is full of steep slopes. The proposed road is on the slope side away from the
lake, but due to the long narrow lots proposed and the distance between the proposed
road and the lake, this plan would result in eight more roads being built to lead into each
of the lots. These subsequent roads, along with buildings and lawns, would result in
alterations of topography and clearing of vegetation. The effects of these changes plus
the use of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, along with runoff and erosion would
impact the lake negatively.
2. The habitat for plants and animals in need of special protection would be effected.
There are at least two eagle nests in the proposed development, and there have been
frequent bald eagle sightings, along with loons, pileated woodpeckers, fox, beaver,
muskrats, osprey, herons, hawks, mink, and white and yellow water lilies.
3. The shoreline on the proposed development and the lake itself are not suited to more
water based recreation. Some of the shoreline is a wetland area, and the rest is very soft
mud bottom. The small size of the lake, only 45 acres, does not lend itself to more water
traffic than it already has. Adding eight more lots on a lake this small would have a
significant negative environmental impact.
4. There was no indication on the survey map to show the 100 year flood plain, nor was
there any elevation data on the proposed lots. It would be impossible to assess the
environmental impact on the area with out information on the soils, topography and
vegetation in the area.
We would like to request that an environmental impact assessment be done on the
proposed development before any decision is made on the application for a Conditional
Use Permit.
Thank You
4 Cl\a r\orY[i\ A A\\ q McXjwel ^ ^
March 8, 1999
Dear Planning Commission:
This letter is in response to the Notice of Public Hearing for applicant Duane and Marion
Donley and Larry Stoller for a Conditional Use Permit for road approval.
We, the undersigned residents living near Lake Alice, are concerned about the
environmental impact of the proposed development on the south shore of the lake. We
believe it is a sensitive area due to the following reasons:
1. The area is full of steep slopes. The proposed road is on the slope side away from the
lake, but due to the long narrow lots proposed and the distance between the proposed
road and the lake, this plan would result in eight more roads being built to lead into each
of the lots. These subsequent roads, along with buildings and lawns, would result in
alterations of topography and clearing of vegetation. The effects of these changes plus
the use of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, along with runoff and erosion would
impact the lake negatively.
2. The habitat for plants and animals in need of special protection would be effected.
There are at least two eagle nests in the proposed development, and there have been
frequent bald eagle sightings, along with loons, pileated woodpeckers, fox, beaver,
muskrats, osprey, herons, hawks, mink, and white and yellow water lilies.
3. The shoreline on the proposed development and the lake itself are not suited to more
water based recreation. Some of the shoreline is a wetland area, and the rest is very soft
mud bottom. The small size of the lake, only 45 acres, does not lend itself to more water
traffic than it already has. Adding eight more lots on a lake this small would have a
significant negative environmental impact.
4. There was no indication on the survey map to show the 100 year flood plain, nor was
there any elevation data on the proposed lots. It would be impossible to assess the
environmental impact on the area with out infonnation on the soils, topography and
vegetation in the area.
We would like to request that an environmental impact assessment be done on the
proposed development before any decision is made on the application for a Conditional
Use Permit.
Thank You
March 8, 1999
Dear Planning Commission:
This letter is in response to the Notice of Public Hearing for applicant Duane and Marion
Donley and Larry Stoller for a Conditional Use Permit for road approval.
We are concerned about the environmental impact of the proposed development on the
south shore of the lake. We believe it is a sensitive area due to the following reasons:
1. The area is full of steep slopes. The proposed road is on the slope side away from the
lake, but due to the long narrow lots proposed and the distance between the proposed
road and the lake, this plan would result in eight more roads being built to lead into each
of the lots. These subsequent roads, along with buildings and lawns, would result in
alterations of topography and clearing of vegetation. The effects of these changes plus
the use of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, along with runoff and erosion would
impact the lake negatively.
2. The habitat for plants and animals in need of special protection would be effected.
There are at least two eagle nests in the proposed development, and there have been
frequent bald eagle sightings, along with loons, pileated woodpeckers, fox, beaver,
muskrats, osprey, herons, hawks, mink, and white and yellow water lilies.
3. The shoreline on the proposed development and the lake itself are not suited to more
water based recreation. Some of the shoreline is a wetland area, and the rest is very soft
mud bottom. The small size of the lake, only 45 acres, does not lend itself to more water
traffic than it already has. Adding eight more lots on a lake this small would have a
significant negative environmental impact.
4. There was no indication on the survey map to show the 100 year flood plain, nor was
there any elevation data on the proposed lots. It would be impossible to assess the
environmental impact on the area with out information on the soils, topography and
vegetation in the area.
We would like to request that an environmental impact assessment be done on the
proposed development before any decision is made on the application for a Conditional
Use Permit.
Thank You
1)
t
Richard West. P.E.
C 'aunty En^tineer
Phone 21H-739-2271
Fax 21S-739-1070
OTTER TAIL COUNTY
HIGHWA Y DEPAR TMENT
419 S. Court Street. Fergus Falls. MN 56537
September 10. 1999
SEP 10 1999
Mr. Steve Sletner, P.E.
TEC Design
3030 Harbor Lane. Suite 124
Plymouth. MN 55447
North American Lakes and Lands. LLC
Lake Alice Proposed Subdivision Roadway Design
TEC Project No. 997301
RE:
Dear Steve:
I met with Mr. Bill Kalar, Otter Tail County Land and Resource Office Director on September 2. 1999 to
review your proposed roadway design. Mr. Kalar asked me to contact you with the following comments:
Proposed V-bottom ditches: We believe the V-bottom ditches w ill be very prone to erosion
problems because of the moderate to steep road grades. We are requesting that the ditches be
constructed with a five foot flat bottom to spread the water flow and minimize the erosion
potential.
Roadway Grades: The Otter Tail County Subdivision Controls Ordinance. Appendix III.
Minimum Road Standards call for a maximum grade of 8%. Your proposed grade-line has four
locations where the grades e.xceed 8%. Please adjust grade-line to comply with the Ordinance
requirements.
After these changes are made on the plan set, please re-submit to us for review. Thank you.
Sincerely.
Otter Tail County Highway Department
Richard West. P.E.
County Engineer
RKW:co
cc: Mr. Bill Kalar, Otter Tail County Land & Resource Office
File
Enel. Otter Tail County Minimum Road Standards
\\ENGINEERING\SYS\USERS\HWYSHARE\MISC mk\Lake Alice Design.doc
iAN EQUAL OPPORTUNtTY/AFFIRMA TIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
V Subdivision Controls Ordinance
of Otter Tail County
Page 1 7
APPENDIX III
MINIMUM ROAD STANDARDS
;
The following width and grade standards of road design shall be observed by
the subdivider:
1.
Minimum Riqht-of-Wav Width Maximum Grade
Highways and Arterial Roads/Gollector Roads
80 Feet 6%(secondary)
100 Feet 6%(primary)
Local Roads
8%66 Feet(tertiary)
33-Feet 8%Alleys
2. All roads dedicated for public use or for the use of lot owners on a plat
presented for the approval shall-have a permanent minimum width of 66 feet right-
of-way (during the road construction period the right-of-way width may exceed 66
feet to provide for the appropriate backslope). Dead end roads require a cul-de-sac ^
which has a minimum 120 foot diameter.
3. All dedicated roadways have a roadbed of not less than 24 feet in width when a
permanent gravel surface is anticipated and not less than 32 feet when a
bituminous surface is anticipated. All cul-de-sacs, regardless of surface type, Shall
have a minimum traveled surface diameter of 100 feet.
When necessary for drainage, ditches along the roadbed^all nbtl^beije^S-=
than 2 feet deep. ^
4.
5. Graveling is required. Minimum gravel thickness shall be.3 inches; compacted
or 4 inches loose.
i
6. Call Land ,& Resource Management Office, 218-739-227T when road is
ready fpr inspection.
APPENDIX III
TYPICAL GRADING SECTION
1vw R/W
33'33’
l-IQ3'12’12’
i 1T2.0’
\________/•b2 t
OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICANT: Duane & Marion Donley
RRl Box 159
Richville, MN 56576
Larry Stoller (Buyer)
291 Palomino Dr
St Paul, MN 55124
HEARING DATE/LOCATION: January 13, 1998 at 8:00 P.M.
Commissioner's Room
Otter Tail County Courthouse
Fergus Falls, MN 56537
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (AS STATED ON THE APPLICATION) :
Use Permit Application for road approval.
Lakes and Land, LLC (Larry Stoller), are the prospective owners of
the subject property, subject to our closing with the Donleys by the
end of December,
probable,
provided by the Donleys,
road which
Ultimately,
developed lots with a minimum of disruption to the land,
property is a relatively steep grade to the lake, and our proposed
configuration flows with the land at some of its highest elevations,
thereby minimizing cuts, fills and timber clearing that may be
necessary in other plans. In addition, we believe that this plan
would offer the most pleasing view of the property from Highway 14,
retaining the property itself, not the road development, as the
focus of attention for the public.
A Conditional
We at North 7\merican
The road configuration is approximate, but
pending our receipt of the full boundary survey to be
Its placement provides a layout for the
would be secluded by substantial, mature forest,
the new road would provide reasonable access to
The
LAKE NAME/NUMBER/CLASS: Lake Alice (56-244), NE
FIRE NUMBER: N/A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt Gov Lot 6 (40.73 Ac), Section 25 & NEl/4 NEl/4
(40 Ac), Section 36 of Dead Lake Township
The above Applicant has made Application to the Otter Tail County
Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit as per the
requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail
County. Details of the Application are available for viewing at the
Land & Resource Management Office, Courthouse, Fergus Falls, MN
56537. Any comments regarding this request may be expressed at the
Hearing or forwarded to the Land & Resource Management Office.
INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS SHOULD CONTACT THE LAND
& RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HEARING.
Bob Schwartz December 23, 1998
Chairman Planning Commission Mailing Date
■i
>PURCHASE AGREEMENTSc,106. Address
107. Page 3 Date /t7 -
108. REAL ESTATE TAXES shall be paid as follows:
109. Buyer shall pay, PRORATED FROM DAY OF CLOSING,___12THS^Li)nONE real estate taxes due and payable in the year 19 .
(CffCle one) ‘110. Seller shall pay, PRORATED TO DA? OF CLOSING,___12THS,/^lQ NONE real estale taxes due and payable in the year 19 . If the
(circle one)
111. Closing date is changed, the real estate taxes paid shalLJLororated, be adjusted to the new closing date. Seller warrants taxes due and
112. payable in the year 19 will be FULL-PAR'pNOlsNhomestead classification. If part or non-homestead classification is circled.
' tciicieon^
113. Seller agrees to pay Buyer at closing $ O •"*
114. toward the non-homestead real estate taxes. Buyer agrees to pay any remaining balance of non-homestead taxes when they become
115. due and payable. No representations are made concerning the amount of subsequent real estate taxes.
116. POSSESSION: Seller shall deliver possession of the property not later than
117. All mterest. homeowner association dues, rents, fuel oil, liquid petroleum gas and all charges for city water, city sewer, electricity, and natural
118. gas shall be prorated between the parlies as of date of closing. Seller agrees to remove ALL DEBRIS AND ALL PERSONAL PROPERTY
119. NOT INCLUDED HEREIN from the property by possession dale. .
120. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: To the best of the Seller's knowledge there are no hazardous substances, dr underground storage tanks, except
121. herein noted:
122. __ . . . ______
after closing.
123. SELLER WARRANTS THAT THE PROPERTY IS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO: CITY SEWER DYES^NO CITY WATER □ YES
124. SELLER/BUYER AGREES TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TEST RESULTS IF REQUIRED BY GOVERNING AUTHORITY AND/OR LENDER.
(circle one)
125. SELLER/BUYER AGREES TO PROVIDE, IF REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT OR BY GOVERNING
(circle one) “ “
126. AUTHORITY AND/OR LENDER, A LICENSED INSPECTOR’S SEPTIC SYSTEM INSPECTION REPORT OR NOTICE INDICATING IF
127. THE SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. NOTICE: A VALID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR THE SYSTEM MAY
128. SATISFY THIS OBLIGATION. NOTHING IN LINES 125 TO 129 SHALL OBLIGATE SELLER TO UPGRADE, REPAIR OR REPLACE THE
129. SEPTIC SYSTEM UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO IN THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT.
130. SELLER WARRANTS THAT CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING. HEATING. PLUMBING AND WIRING SYSTEMS USED AND LOCATED ON
131. SAID PROPERTY WILL BE IN WORKING ORDER ON DATE OF CLOSING, EXCEPT AS NOTED IN THIS AGREEMENT.
132. BUYER HAS THE RIGHT TO A WALK-THROUGH REVIEW OF THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSING TO ESTABLISH THAT THE
133. PROPERTY IS IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CONDITION AS OF THE DATE OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT.
I
134. BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT NO ORAL REPRESENTATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE REGARDING POSSIBLE PROBLEMS OF WATER
135. IN BASEMENT. OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER OR ICE BUILD-UP ON ROOF OF THE PROPERTY AND BUYER RELIES
136. SOLELY IN THAT REGARD ON THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT BY SELLER:
137. SELLER HAS / HAS NOT HAD A WET BASEMENT. AND HAS / HAS NOT HAD ROOF. WALL OR CEILING DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER
(circle one)(Circle one)/ff^NOT/t
({circio oncl
138. OR ICE BUILD-UP. BUYER HAS ECEIVED A SELLER'S PROPERTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.
139. BUYER HAS RECEIVED THE INSPECTION REPORTS, IF REQUIRED BY MUNICIPALITY.
140. BUYER HAS RECEIVED THE WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR A STATEMENT THAT NO WELL EXISTS ON THE PROPERTY,
141. AND A SEPTIC SYSTEM DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR A STATEMENT THAT NO SEPTIC SYSTEM EXISTS ON OR SERVES THE
142. PROPERTY. AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES.
143. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE;,RECEIVED AND HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE ARBITRATION DISCLOSURE AND
144. RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT.
JSfeUVER(S)
_ BUYER(S)
145. SELLER(S)
146. SELLER(S)
147.NOTICE
I / (Licensee)
(Company)
is Seller’s Agent/Buyer’s Agent/Dual Agenimon-Agenn
' (arde one) ^ '■ ■
148.
149.
150.is Seller's Agent/Buyer's Agent/Dual Agent/Non-Agent(Licensee)
(citdc one)151.
(Company)
THIS NOTICE DOES NOT SATISFY MINNESOTA STATUTORY AGENCY DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.152.I
153.DUAL AGENCY REPRESENTATION
DUAL AGENCY FtEPFtESENTATION OpES(^OE^p^PpLY IN THIS TRANSACTION.154./
155. Broker represents both the Sel(er(s) and the Buyer(s) of the property involved in this transaction, which creates a dual agency. This
156. means that Broker and its salespersons owe fiduciary duties to both Seller(s) and Buyer(s). Because the parties may have confiicting
157. interests. Broker and its salespersons are prohibited from advocating exclusively for either party. Broker cannot act as a dual agent in this
158. transaction without the consent of both Seller(s) and Buyer(s). Seller(s) and Buyer(s) acknowledge that:
159.
160.
161.
162.
(1) confidential information communicated to Broker which regards price, terms, or motivation to buy or sell will remain confidential
unless Seller(s) or Buyer(s) instructs Broker in writing to disclose this information. Other information will be shared;
(2) Broker and its salespersons will not represent the interest of either party to the detriment of the other; and
(3) within the limits of dual agency. Broker and its salespersons will work diligently to facilitate the mechanics of the sale.
163. With the knowledge and understanding of the explanation above, Seller(s) and Buyer(s) authorize and instruct Broker and its salespersons
164. to act as c^l agents in this transaction.
M a /165.
Seller
166.
Seller Buyer
167.
Date D?te, .
?
r ■ ■/■
OO■s (!
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
168. Address ^ -
169. Page 4 Date
■fc£:
A /T'/5 r?/<a-r-
170, OTHER:
A^/Ures -75 £^( a-r/fJii, 7~.^/^ g»-
"' ■ ' ■' V{5LAf>sJ. /‘^yjjoe /)
Z^ :Sercc^e^172.
AllU^SlJ /
^rr.'MJO^jej^ ■SLxjrev’^^ C'J!=
173.
~iUT ^u\£3-^i£Crir174.
175. I, the owner of the properly, accept this Agreement and
176. authorize the listing broker to withdraw said property from
177. the market, unless instructed otherwise in writing and
178. I have reviewed all pages of this Purchase Agreement,
I agree to purchase the property for the price and in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth above
and I have reviewed ali pages of this Purchase Agreement.
t //yl^
Seller's Signature) —UikL /o -3^-fS'179. X.
(Buyer's Signature)(tale)(Date)
(Buyer's Printed Name) *
IIU^UE__Qj^N-L^X180.x
(Seller's Printed Name)
Ais7/t^-riL4 AsrJ^iri'
M.181. X X
(Social Security Number - optional)(Marital Status)(Social Security Number • optional)(Marital Status)
182. X X
(Seller’s Signature)(Buyer's Signature)(Date)
}/y\ci.Cion n ley
(Seller's Printed Name) ’ j
183. X X
(Buyer’s Printed Name)
t
^75~
(Social Security Number - oplional)(^nL184.x X
(Marital Status)(Social Security Number - optional)(Marital Status)
<S'S‘
THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT BETWEEN BUYERS AND SELLERS.
187. MN:PA-4 (9/97) IF YOU DESIRE LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE, CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL.
185, FINAL ACCEPTANCE DATE
186.
'■-■.'•1
I ) ■. i'/f
r
V.
:
iM .. .