Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout14000010001001_Variances_09-12-1996Variances Barcode 128 J4)797037 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE^i$t#M^li9tyi^C4i|^9tfounty of Otter Tail 13 I hereby certlly that the within instrument was filed for record in this office on the ZO day of A.D. 19% at /0//r A M. and was duly Microfilmed as DocJpjtv^liXIlJ^ (7 ' ’ T^y leciider _____Deputy Otter Tail County Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 (218) 739-2271 r_!VM2? Application ^Fans (^(^.(70 — Pleaso Complete With Black Ink — z I •?- 3Hfc-Z^3»3 ^£>2. - ns4 Gtr>Al/P________ Last Name ^ M/ddte RK 3 SH Mn) SGS'T?, Stmet&No ' ! City j fhkio ^ First Owner:Phone: State Zip No. 56' 5 PAAfWoM Lak£ Ho 03 Lake No.Lake Name IZS^ A/ Twp. OE%r> v-ft¥»E ____________Lake Class_____ Twp. Name J^CAO t-ArK-C^ISec.Range DeNiTLegal Description:Fire No. or Lake iD # G L \ _ ifcHO < H - OOP - Q I - OC O / - O0 )Parcel Number VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: iF Tyht^^ I4A^ ornvTne^o o(^ 0>odnJ c^ON\ PueXiio i M co^rzjLy ^ ^^995 In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Sign^rq)of ApplicantiriliaApplication dated 19_^9 P uDate of hearing: ____ MOTION AS FOLLOWS: Motion was made by George Walter, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of approximately 8 to 13’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the replacement of a 10’ by 48’ 6” trailer home with a 52’ by 28’ manufactured home approximately 62 to 67’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that the structure would be setback approximately 57’ from a line between the two southern most lot stakes of the property. It was noted that the new manufactured home will be no closer than the existing home to the ordinary high water level and that the current home was behind the existing building line prior to changes (relocation) of the structure on the adjacent property. Hardship being the terrain and topography of the applicants’ property. Time: .g. Chairman Otter Tail County Board of AdjustmentXNOPermit(s) from Land & Resource Maiwgement required:YES mailed copy of Application to Applicant.(Date/lnitiat) BK 0796-001 277,206 • Victor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Fel.li. Minnesote Variance Requested is: Variance from the 75’ setback for a new structure. Requesting to locate new manufactured 52’ x 28’ home along front-line of existing 10’ x 48’6” trailer home (to be removed), averaging 57’ back from a line between the two southernmost lot stakes of the property (along the shore of Marion Lake). It should be noted that the assumed setback line has been measured from these stakes rather than the Ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Marion Lake. The true OHWL actually falls between 5 and 10’ south of the lot stakes, which would result in the requested setback variance to an average of between 62’ and 67’. The “Existing Buildings” grid plot plan shows the lot as it is today. The “Without Variance” plot plan shows how the new building would need to be placed in order to meet the setback requirement. The “Proposed Placement of New Home” plot plan shows the placement of the new home should a variance be granted. Most other property owners in this samerarea currently maintain structures within the 75’ setback, and as of the date of this document, the neighbors on each side of tliis lot have homes that, if a stringline were stretched between the nearest corners of their homes, would allow placement of the home without variance. However, the neiglibor to, the east, Roger Lind, is currently in the process of removing the southernmost home on his lot. By the time’a permit could be granted, this house on the Lind lot will be gone. The liieiglibor to the west, Don Forness, has many buildings on his lot, several of which are inside the 75’ setback,.iricluding one which is within 10’ of the OHWL of Marion Lake. Compliance with the 75’ setback would cause at least3 major hardships: 1) The existing deck and concrete apron surrounding three sides of the current trailer home would have to be removed in order to keep from having an “island of conerete” in the middle of the yard ^between the home and the lake. New concrete aprons/walkways would need to be installed. This expense, including the deck, could run several thousand dollars. 2) The existing back yard of the property would be rendered useless, an may cause the existing drive to be shortened significantly, if not completely eliminated. If the variance is granted, the back yard would still be useful in size and slope, and the existing drive (along the steep slope and along the east edge of the property) could still be used as it is currently. 3) A new fresh water well would probably need to be drilled, to avoid locating a pump station in the middle of the yard between the home and the lake. If the variance is granted, the existing well could be maintained. Althougli the septic tank may clear the 10’ building setback, it would be much closer to the home than.it would be if the variance was granted. ; 'AUG 1 5.1S96 IAND& resource > GRID PLOT PLANL___^inch(es) equals .^3 feet SKETCHING FORMgrid(s) equals 3« 3 feet/Scale:, or %, 19Dated:Signature/sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road rigft^of-way, lake, sideyard an^eptic tank and drain- ach bukdina'currenti^n lot-iancl’any proposed structures. ----------- Existing Buiiamgs Please field for e Part of Gov't. Lot 1. Section 1. Township 135 North. Range 40 West Ottertail Countj'. MN (Wees, Ward) Dedicated public road Steep Bank Lot 1. Block 1 Southview' (Roger & Carol Lind)}Lot stak / / /I’ropane tanf / E. Line, Gov't. ^it 1, Section 1,T.135 N„ R.40 W./l,ot 3. Block 2 Marion Lake Lodge (Don & Marilyn Fomess) Setback’': • •i house/Existing I railer HomeIBath /iI23'6"/y Concrete walk / 75' / *Note: Setback line has been measured from the lot stakes, w hich appear to be between five and ten feetinside the ordinaiv high w ater lev el of Marion Lake. If measured from the high w ater level, the setback lines should be reset that much closer to the lake. /55’75 i.-.J59 iSS'X- -I AUG 1 5 1396 i LA.GD&fi£SOURGE 281.949 • Victor Lundean Cd., Pkintars • Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800-346-4870MKL — 0871 029 i - ^ GRID PLOT PLANinch(es) equals 33 feet SKETCHING FORMLf.grid(s) equals 3.3 feet, or.Scale: / 19Dated;Signature Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-m^way, lake, sideyard and septic tank and drain- field for each building currently on lot and any proposed Structures. Without Variance Part of Ciov't. Lot 1. Section 1. Township 135 North. Range 40 West Ottertaii County. MN (Wees. Ward) Dram le d Dedicated public road Steep Bank i Lot 1. Block 1 Southview (Roger & Carol Lind)Lot stak / /New Manufaetmed Home .52’ X 28 •/ APropane tanlT / E. Une, Gov’t. Lot 1, SeUittn 1, T.135 R, R.40 W.WellFish-/Lot 3. Block 2 Marion Lake Lodge (Don & Marilyn Fomess) Setback* ■ ■“i nhouse/ Bath 19'/ 23’6”/ Concrete walk / ■/ 4/ / ' 75' *Note: Setback line has been measured from the lot stake.s. w hieh appear to be between live and ten I'eetinside the ordinaiy high water level of Marion Lake. If mea.sured from the high water level, the setback lines should be reset that much 55'75 I.-J59' 00^X1 1 ri /TiiStkX 7™ '*X. * ™ L ... . AUG 1 5 1996 LANDS RESOURCE MKL — 0871 — 029 281.949 • Victor Lundeen Co, (Winters • Fergus Falls. MN • l*B0O-348-4870 September 12,1996 4 Klimp’s Kamp Resort - Approved Kimp’s Kamp Resort, C/0 Jarpes and John Kimple, Dent, MN, requested a variance to replace an existing 16’ by 24’ two bedroom cabin with a 24’ by 24’ story and a half three bedroom, cabin in the same location as the existing cabin. The cabin would be approximately 50’ from the ordinary high water level, 105’ from the septic tanks and 35’ from the duplex dump system. The property is described as Lots-1 through 13, Block 1 and Lots 1 through 3, Block 2, Yaquina Bay and part of Government Lot 4, Section 8 of Dead Lake Township by Dead Lake. The cabin that is being proposed for replacement is located on Lot 8, Block 1, Yaquina Bay. The audience was polled with no'one speaking for or against the request. A letter from the' Dead Lake Association in favor of the variance request was read for the record. After consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance to replace an existing 16’ by 24’ two bedroom cabin with a 24’ by 24’ story and a half three bedroom cabin in the same location as the existing cabin. Fisherman’s Village Resort (David Paul Thompson) - Approved Fisherman’s Village Resort, C/0 David Paul thompson, Battle Lake, MN, requested a variance of 60’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the replacement of two 16’ 6” by 22’ 6” cabins with a 33’ by 22’ 6” two story year round ADA approved dwelling 40’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lots 5, 6, and7, Beauty Beach, Deer Lake in Everts Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or . against the request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 60’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the replacement of two 16’ 6” by 22’ 6” cabins with a 33’ by 22’ 6" two story year round ADA approved dwelling 40’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that the new structure will use no more land area than the original ■ two structures that are being replaced. Jerry J. and Dennis D. Dodd - No Variance Required Jerry J. and Dennis D. Dodd, Clear Lake, lA, requested variances from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the constnjction of five decks to five existing cabins less than 75’ from the ordinary high water level. The decks range in size from 96 square feet to 240 square feet. The drawings would indicate that the setbacks from the ordinary high water level range from approximately 34' to approximately 7T. The property is described as Government Lot 2 and part of Government Lot 4, Section 8 of Maplewood Township by South Lake Lida. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration and discussion, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to allow the applicants to withdraw their variance request since all of the proposed decks will be under three feet in total height and to authorize a partial refund of the variance application fee. Susan C. Ward and Judy M. Wees - Approved Susan C. Ward and Judy M. Wees, Perham, MN, requested a variance of approximately 8 to 13’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the replacement of a 10’ by 48’ 6” trailer home with a 52’ by 28’ manufactured home approximately 62 to 67’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that the structure would be setback approximately 57’ from a line between the two southern most lot stakes of the property. The property is described as part of Government Lot 1, Section 1 of Dead Lake Township by Marion Lake. Arthur Gorup represented the appiicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. A letter from Don Fomess stating no objections to the variance requested was read for the record. After consideration, motion was made by George Walter, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of approximately 8 to 13’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the replacement of a 10’ by 48’ 6” trailer home with a 52’ by 28’ manufactured home approximately 62 to 67’ from the ordinary high water level. It should be noted that the structure would be setback approximately 57’ from a line between the two southern most lot stakes of<the property. It was noted that the new manufactured home will be no closer than the existing home to the ordinary high water level and that the current home was behind the existing building line prior to changes (relocation) of the structure on the adjacent property. Hardship being the terrain and topography of the applicants’ property.