Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout32000990479000_Conditional Use Permits_09-21-2011Conditional Use Permits Barcode 128 0R\z\\'2o\i 1098508 DOC# 1098508received m 201t land resource Hill III il ililllillii I ill1098508 Fee: $46.00 Well Certificate [ ] Rec'd OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified, Filed, and/or Recorded: October 12, 2011 8:30 AM Wendy L. Metcalf, Recorder Returned To: LAND & RESOURCE By: LL THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee l%0(£l_COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date DAYTIME PHONE 7oi ~ IQCq - 31.2.GPROPERTY OWNER(S) Ai-s>4-' ^ / TOWNSHIP iXl RANGE Ot/o TOWNSHIP NAME U-oUr-V s IMAILING ADDRESS LAKE NUMBER 5 C> ' LAKE NAME__^ ’C-^O 2ALAKE CLASS SECTION 07 E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Au 7c-(e> '.rw 3>Zoc.o^^qf/ 77ooO 5/ho Ac-50LEGAL DESCRIPTION ioc-lc_ 2» Sc4«l^ C.L(,U\- \ 701- ;L^g- -^isyCONDITIONAL USE PROJECT REQUESTED (Please circle the appropriate request) Topographical Alteration if- Commercial Use___ Cluster Development___ Extractive Use Forest Land Conversion Industrial Use Miscellaneous SPECIFY YOUR REQUEST. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. l>ro 9 e^. so'37.' 0iv\<2-y.4i.Cf oc» Ln o ir'x f d -f |V\rL^CrdUUY\ Q / rT(2Fo.. ^ "T t Ctct" t?" Cr-ri?- ^ ( H'OiJfR- I UNDERSTAND THAT APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST APPLIES ONLY TO THE USE OF THE LAND. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT =OR OWNER 7 / DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) ({/Co^^uA '^cJi^O Q^,r^ ^ tOAuaJV'iu' *^ <^H.CU^ <t6 ^U.^ "^$^'^{^1 f ( dM u)o.i^ O^ p^f>of^Jl '^el[>n^^ Of\j£ U)ct(K 0^ €'fd^ <t r ^nofos^ w;d e-hch^L ua^Ue j^.V/k^ a^m ^tO;(l ^ULl o~J tu,^J£ ^ccf-^s^es, cdi u/iii«*^4 ‘^■'‘ b£/f^oJ«4-w>^ <4o^M)i- <i^£ p^aj«T »jf f I'"- i^okt-flA , rC 6m ^Q_d£X^ b’.ig fHDate Of Planning Commission Hearing Time Planning Commission Recommendation September 21, 2011-Motion: A motion by Boyer, second by Maske to approve as presented. F)^d9f,vr\ Chairman/Otter Tail Coiinty Planning Commission County Board Action Approved As Recommended Denied As Recommended Other UjJj^cn jdiij^oi) Date of Final Actionihairman/Otter Tail Cou oard of Commissioners L0iCo{^[{fc(e5^CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT # ^ L & R Official/Dfete - \.ili.o(^i( L & R Official/Date Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management <0-X"Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co, Assessor and MN DNR bk 062007-006 fJid o/j (Vi>jW%'■M 'i Project Description This Conditional Use Permit is being submitted by Terry Becker Construction L.L.C of Fargo North Dakota on behalf of property owners Matt and Bridget Cullen. Parcel number 32000990479000 Lot 3 - Block 2 - Hobart Township Sect 07 - Twp 137 - Range 040 Plat 01400 Scalp Lake Acres Purpose of Request Proposing the excavation of unstable soil material on-site and the construction of a suitable building pad for a single family dwelling unit and a detached garage. Project Scope In 2008 soil tests were conducted by Northern Technologies Inc. (NTI) on the Cullen property. The tests took place near the center of the property (reference drawing A0.2 for exact locations). At that time it was discovered that large amounts of unstable soil were present on site. Consisting of hemic peat and general organic material unstable soils were found to reach depths of up to 24'. At this time, it was determined by both Terry Becker Construction L.L.C and the Cullen's, that building a structure in this location was not feasible. Again on June 29, 2011 NTI conducted soil tests on the Cullen property in an attempt to find more stable soils on the road side of the property; to the east (reference drawing A0.2 for exact locations). After testing, it was concluded that the quality of soil improves, although unstable soils were still present. NTI prepared a report of their findings in which they listed the vertical depth to stable soil per soil boring. Their finding varied from 6" to 16 feet (see Table 1 on page 5 of the attached NTI report for exact depths) Included with their 2011 report, NTI gave their recommendation for site preparation of the proposed single family dwelling unit. NTI has recommended that all unstable soils below the proposed dwelling be excavated and a base consisting of sand and gravel is to be constructed to the level needed for foundation wall footings to be placed. The depth to be excavated is estimated to be at elevations 1356-1351. The elevation for the top of the footing is at 1365. This results in a building pad height of 8'-2" to 13'-2" (see sheets A4.1 and A4.2 for details). The reason for the variation in height is due to the volatile soil conditions, the depth of unstable soils varies greatly throughout the footprint of the dwelling. The averages that are given are figured with the mind set that a 13'-2" depth building pad is the worst case scenario, and that a depth of 8'-2" is best case scenario, a more reasonable estimation of an average between the two is the most probable. A detached garage is also proposed for the site. NTI has recommended a base measuring 3'-6" in depth be placed below a floating slab consisting of the same grade sand and gravel as the dwelling unit's building pad. Placed in this base will be two layers of Geogrid material to help unify base settlement (for construction documents see sheet A4.1 Section B, for NTI's recommendation see section 4.9 on page 11 of NTI's report). No excavation would be necessary for the proposed garage, fill would be added to the existing grade to bring the top of slab height up to 1371.5. The following tables gives an estimation on the amount of soil displacement. Table 1 Dwelling Unit Soil to be excavated Cubic yards removedElevation Depth 6,2901351 1353.5 4,844 1356 3,398 Material needed for building pad Elevation Depth Cubic yards placed 4,2341351 1353.5 3,176 2,1181356 Material for fill and grading Elevation Depth Cubic yards placed 1351 2,748 1353.5 2,115 1,4821356 Table 2 Detached Garage Material needed for building pad Elevation Depth Cubic yards placed 3.5'195 Material for fill and grading Cubic yards placed 62 Some of the soil that is to be excavated is stable and usable. We are proposing keeping an estimation of 1,000-1,600 cubic yards of material on site to be used for fill purposes. NTI will determine which extracted soil is considered stable, that soil will then be stored on site and used for fill throughout the construction process. The varying depths and corresponding cubic yards of material needed for fill in Table 1 is given to show the possible range of building pad depth. The actual depth will ultimately be determined by NTI during excavation. At the current time, NTI has determined that all data that can depict the varying depths of soils on site have been obtained. Physical removal of material must take place before an exact depth can be determined. Terry Becker Construction L.L.C. is asking this Conditional Use Permit will allow the excavation and the construction of a building pad and the fill material needed to a depth at or near an elevation of 1351. The elevation of 1351 has been determined as the deepest foreseeable depth needed. Table 3 shows the estimated amoimts of material that will enter and leave the site during construction of both the single family home and the detached garage. The data is based on an excavation depth of the home at 1351. Table 3 Excavation 6,290 cubic yardsSoil to be excavated 1,000-1,600 cubic yardsSoil to be stored on site 5,290-4,690 cubic yardsActual removal of excavated soil from site Placement of Material 4,429 cubic yardsBuilding pad material placed on-site 2,810 cubic yardsMaterial needed for fill and grading 1,810-1,210 cubic yardsMaterial needed for fill after stock piles are used There are two reasons for the large amount of material needed for filling and grading the site. The first is to fill in the large excavation over-dig needed to accommodate a building pad the size that is being proposed. All calculation of fill needed were based on a 1:2 slope over dig accommodating the size of the building pad. The second reason for the amount of fill is to build up the area around the foundation to allow for proper drainage around the dwelling unit and detached garage. An elevation of 1374 for the top of the foundation was determined as an adequate height to allow for drainage. The goal is to construct the proposed finish grade to conform to the existing grade as much as possible (Note; on Section A sheet A4.2 the proposed grade in comparison to the existing grade). As the property drains towards the lake the natural slope rises, this will not change after construction, the flow of water to the lake will not be direct, a T-0" change in elevation from 1364 to 1365 will create a small catch basin to alleviate direct flow of runoff to the lake. The Role of Northern Technology Inc. Throughout the testing and design process of this entire project NTI has given recommendations as to the best practice of construction. All drawings that are being submitted have been reviewed and revised based upon NTI's recommendations. Throughout the process of excavation and construction of the proposed building pad NTI will be present to ensure that the construction of the building pad will be completed in the manner that they have outlined. Please see the attached letter from Dan Gibson of Northern Technology Inc. outlining their current and future roles during the construction process. Environmental Effects Disturbing such a large area of land near a body of water creates many environmental concerns. The environmental impact this project may create with regards to the water quality, wildlife, and overall ecosystem of the lake area have been considered with this design. Sheet AO.3 is a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that outlines our plans for protecting the integrity of the site's environmental surroundings. Most notably the SWPPP plan shows the undisturbed areas of the lot that will not be affected during construction. A 100' buffer from the construction area of the site to the lake's shore will remain intact at all times. Between the construction area and the lake will be two separate runs of silt fencing to eliminate the possibility of sediment runoff The natural flow of runoff from the site will remain in the same general location as it would be undisturbed. This storm water runoff will be filtered through the use of three separate 8" straw waddles that will remove sediment before the water reaches the undisturbed areas of the site and ultimately the lake. Conclusion In 2006 the Cullens purchased their property having no prior knowledge of the poor soil conditions on site. Over the past five years we have conducted multiple soil tests and created several design options. We feel that the proposed plans are the most viable solution to the problems that exist for this property. The proposed size of the building is not overly large, the livable space of the home's main level is at 2,255 square feet with roughly 1,300 square feet of outdoor space. We feel the size of the structure is well with-in a scale to its overall surroundings. The amount of soil to be extracted and material to be brought on site is a result of the poor soil conditions rather than the desire to build an oversized structure. Essentially the proposed plan is the only option to build any type of structure on this site. We hope you take a look at the research, engineering and design work that has gone into this project and understand that this is not the first solution we have to the issues on this site, rather this is the best possible plan to proceed. Terry Becker Construction, L.L.C. Terry Becker President/Owner Northern Technologies. Inc. 3522 4th Avenue Soutli Fargo ND 5S103 701-232-1822 701-232-1864 Fax August 22, 2011 Otter Tail County Planning BoardAttn: Construction of Lake Home (Building Pad) Hobart Township - Lot 3, Block 1 Plat 01400 Scalp Lake Acres NTI Project No. 11-1142.100 Subject: This correspondence is to provide information as to the involvement of Northern Technologies, Inc., (NTI) in the design and proposed construction of the Lake Home on Lot 3, Block 1 of Scalp Lake Acres. NTI was contracted by Terry Becker Construction to conduct a Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Report for the proposed project. NTI issued the report for the project on June 29, 2011. Our report provided recommendations for excavation of poor soils and construction of a suitable building pad for the proposed lake home. Terry Becker Construction has developed some schematics for excavation and backfilling of the building pad based on our June 29, 2011 report. NTI reviewed the schematics and provided input for the plans to be submitted to the Board. Once a building permit is approved, NTI will be under contract to observe, test, and document that the building pad is constructed per our recommendations. We anticipate this will require NTI to be present on a near full time basis until completion of the building pad. Test reports and photos will be compiled into a final report upon completion. If there are any questions regarding our review and recommendations or of future NTI involvement on the project, please contact us at your convenience at (701) 232-1822. Northern Technologies, Inc. Dan Gibson, P.E. Project Engineer Cc: Terry Becker Construction Fargo • minneapous • grand forks GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTl Project No. 11-11143.100 T • Northern Technologies, Inc. 4tfi Avenue Fat)(X ND J8I03 7DI-232-IB22 701-232-1864 Fox June 29, 2011 Terry Becker Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 10206 5555 51st Ave Sw Fargo, ND 58104 Mr. Terry BeckerAttn: Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTI Project No. 11-11143.100 Subject: In accordance to your request and subsequent June 13, 2011 authorization. Northern Technologies, Inc. (NTI) conducted a Geotechnical Exploration for the above referenced project. Our services included advancement of exploration borings and preparation of an engineering report with recommendations developed from our geotechnical services. Our work was performed in general accordance with our proposal of June 1,2011. Soil samples obtained at the site will be held for 60 days at which time they will be discarded. Please advise us in writing if you wish to have us retain them for a longer period. You will be assessed an additional fee if soil samples are retained beyond 60 days. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service on this project. If there are any questions regarding the soils explored or our review and recommendations, please contact us at your convenience at (701) 232-1822. Northern Technologies, Inc. Dan Gibson, P.E. Project Engineer Marc D. Shannon, P.E. President cc: Fargo • Minneapolis • Grand Forks GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTl Project No. 11-11143.100 TABLE OF CONTENTS GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTl Project No. 11-11143.100 Page 1EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1.0 2INTRODUCTION 2.1 Site / Project Description 2.2 Scope of Services 2.0 2 2 3EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS 3.1 Exploration Scope 3.2 Surface Conditions 3.3 Subsurface Conditions 3.4 Ground Water Conditions 3.5 Laboratoiy Test Program 3.0 3 3 3 4 4 4ENGINEERING REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Project Scope 4.2 Site Preparation 4.3 Foundations 4.4 Bearing Factor of Safety and Estimate of Footing Settlement 4.5 Slab-on-Grade Floors 4.6 Exterior Backfill & Subsurface Drainage 4.7 Surface Drainage 4.8 Utilities 4.9 Future Storage Garage 4.0 5 5 6 8 8 9 10 11 11 12CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation Stability 5.2 Engineered Fill and Winter Construction 5.3 Operation of Project Sumps 5.0 12 12 13 136.0 CLOSURE APPENDICES Appendix A - Geotechnical Evaluation of Recovered Soil Samples, Field Exploration Procedures, General Notes, Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, Excavation Oversize Diagram Appendix B - Ground Water Issues, Geotextile Fabric, Placement and Compaction of Engineered Fill, Project Sumps Appendix C - Site Diagram, Boring Logs, 2008 Site Plan, 2008 Boring Logs GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTI Project No. 11-11143.100 1.0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We briefly summarize below our geotechnical recommendations for the proposed project. The summary must be read in complete context with our report. We conclude you may support the proposed Cullen Lake Home (House) by founding of standard perimeter strip and spread column footings on the engineered fill section as recommended within our report. Building linear strip footings and interior-column footings may be proportioned using the maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures of Table 2. Our exploration indicates Topsoil, Fill, and Peat extends from approximately 'A to 16 feet at project borings. You should anticipated similar but variable depth of Topsoil, Fill, and Peat across the project. We recommend additional evaluation during site stripping and excavation to confirm removal of unsuitable soils from below project construction. Measurable groundwater was encountered at depths from 4 to 12 feet during advancement and/or at completion of select borings. We believe the shallow ground water depth may be due to boreholes caving after retrieval of our auger. You can anticipate ground water occurring at depths of 6 to 8 feet below grade at the boring locations. Continuous pumping of ground water by use of sump holes or a dewatering system will need to be implemented to advance excavations to depths required to remove all of the peat and poor soils. Overall, the site soils are conducive to movement of ground water both laterally and vertically. The moisture content of such soils can vary annually and per recent precipitation. Such soils and other regional dependent conditions may produce ground water entry of project excavations at depths shallower than encountered in our soil borings. We direct your attention to other report sections and appendices concerning ground water issues and subsurface drainage. Page 1 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. MinnesotaNTI Project No. 1 l-l lf43.IOO Our report recommendations are predicated on the geotechnical engineer of record or their representative reviews all project excavations prior to placement of engineered fill and that soil compaction tests are taken as necessary to verify fill placement is in compliance with report recommendations. It is herein understood failure to comply with required observation and compaction testing criteria shall relieve Northern Technologies from any and all liability associated with support of project foundations /floors. 2.0. INTRODUCTION Site / Project Description2.1. The proposed House is to be constructed on a vacant parcel known as lot 3 block 2 of Plat 01400 Scalp Lake Acres on Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota. The single story, wood framed rambler with either a crawl space or basement will utilize perimeter strip footings, interior strip footings and interior column footings for support of above grade loads. 2.2. Scope of Services The purpose of this report is to present a summary of our geotechnical exploration and provide generalized opinions and recommendations regarding the soil conditions and design parameters for founding of the project. Our “scope of services” was limited to the following: 1. Explore the project subsurface by means of six (6) standard penetration borings extending to maximum depth of 26 feet, and conduct laboratory tests on representative samples to characterize the engineering and index properties of the soils. 2. Prepare a report presenting our findings from our field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering recommendations for foundation types, footing depths, allowable bearing capacity, estimated settlements, floor slab support, excavation, engineered fill, backfill, compaction and potential construction difficulties related to excavation, backfilling and drainage. Page 2 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. MinnesotaNTI Project No. II-IU^IIOO 3.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS 3.1 Exploration Scope Site geotechnical drilling occurred on June 9, 2011 with individual borings advanced at approximate locations as presented on the diagram within the appendices. NTI located the borings relative to existing site features, and determined the approximate elevation of the borings relative to the benchmark (BM), a 60d nail driven into the power pole located on the south side of the driveway to the lot. The elevation of the TBM, as assigned by Houston Engineering, is 1373.73 feet. 3.2 Surface Conditions The property for the proposed House is currently vacant with minimal vegetative cover and a few trees. NTI previously advanced soil borings on this lot and encountered uncontrolled fill over peat. The boring logs and site sketch from borings advanced in 2008 are appended to this report. Surface drainage flows east towards Scalp Lake (Lake 7). The elevation change between borings is less than 3 feet with the lake level currently being 6 to 7 feet lower than the soil boring locations. 3.3 Subsurface Conditions Please refer to the boring logs within the appendices for a detailed description and depths of stratum at each boring. The boreholes were backfilled with auger cuttings, or were abandoned using high solids bentonite or neat cement grout as per appropriate local and state statutes. Minor settlement of the boreholes will occur. Owner is responsible for final closure of the boreholes. The general geologic origin of retained soil samples is listed on the boring logs. The upper portion of each borings was sampled using auger flights and is approximate. The overall subsurface soil profile at the borings consists of approximately 14 to 16 feet of Topsoil, Fill, and Peat underlain by loose to dense Coarse and Mixed Alluvium (CA / MA) extending to the termination depth of borings (maximum 26 feet). The MA and CA soils include sand, silty/clayey sand, and sandy silt of varying color, grain size, gravel content and moisture content. Additional comment on the evaluation of recovered soil samples is presented within the report attachments. Page 3 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. Minnesota NTI Project No. 11-1 1143 J 00 3.4 Ground Water Conditions The drill crew observed the borings for ground water and noted cave-in depth of the borings, if any during and at the completion of drilling activities. These observations and measurements are noted on the boring logs. Measurable groundwater was encountered at depths from 4 to 12 feet during advancement and/or at completion of select borings. We believe the shallow ground water depth may be due to boreholes caving after retrieval of our auger. You can anticipate ground water occurring at depths of 6 to 8 feet below grade at the boring locations. Continuous pumping ofground water by use of sump holes or a dewatering system will need to be implemented to advance excavations to depths required to remove all of the peat and poor soils. Overall, the site soils are conducive to movement of ground water both laterally and vertically. The moisture content of such soils can vary annually and per recent precipitation. Such soils and other regional dependent conditions may produce ground water entry of project excavations at depths shallower than encountered in our soil borings. We direct your attention to other report sections and appendices concerning ground water issues and subsurface drainage. We direct your attention to other report sections and appendices attachments concerning ground water issues and subsurface drainage. The cave-in depths of the borings were recorded as varying from approximately 4 to 8 feet below existing grade. 3.5 Laboratory Test Program Our analysis and recommendations of this report are based upon our interpretation of the standard penetration resistance determined while sampling soils, hand penetrometer test results obtained during classification of retained soils, and experience with similar soils from other sites near the project. The results of such tests are summarized on the boring logs or attached test forms. 4.0 ENGINEERING REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on our present knowledge of the project. We ask that you or your design team notify us immediately if significant changes are made to project size, location or design as we would need to review our current recommendations and provide modified or different recommendations with respect to such change(s). Page 4 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. Minnesota NTI Project No. 11-11143.100 4.1 Project Scope We understand the House will include concrete foundation walls and footings for support of above grade construction. We anticipate column loads (if any) will be less than 40 kips and wall loads are assumed as not exceeding 3 kips per lineal foot (klf). We understand the project will include upto a 3 foot increase in grade to promote drainage from the structure and to allow for placement of a basement above the water table. Our assessment of the project soils, and opinions and recommendations presented within this report are based directly on our estimated structural loads as applied to the existing site soils. 4.2 Site Preparation Project construction, as proposed, will involve excavation of unsuitable soils and implementation of corrective grading. We recommend removal of all Topsoil, Fill, and Peat and/or any unsuitable material(s) encountered during advancement of project excavations. Our field exploration indicates removal of Topsoil, Fill, and Peat should result in excavations extending from approximately Vi to 16 feet below existing grade. Table 1 provides a summary of excavation necessary to remove unsuitable materials at respective borings. We recommend excavation below the house be advanced to a common elevation to provide equal depths of engineered fill and to minimize differential settlement. Prior to excavation you will need to provide a dewatering system to allow excavation to the depths required to remove all of the peat and unsuitable soils. We recommend you contact a dewatering contractor familiar with the area to assist in developing a system that will allow the proposed excavation depths and placement of the engineered fill section. We recommend that you oversize all earthwork improvements and excavations where fill materials are placed below foundations. The minimum excavation oversize should extend per the requirements outlined within the diagram with the report appendices. Note 1Table 1: Summary of Project Excavation Removal of Unsuitable Materials Existing Ground Elevation (feet, NTI Datum) Excavation Elevation (feet) Boring Number Depth of Materials (feet) 11 Fill and Peat 13 Fill and Peat 13 Fill and Peat 16 Fill and Peat 1/2 Fill/Topsoil 9/2 Fill and Peat 1355.8 1353.5 1356.1 1351.0 1368.3 1356.2 1366.8 1366.5 1369.1 1367.0 1369.2 1367.7 SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 Note 1 Refer to report recommendations for excavation at, and within vicinity of borings. Page 5 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTl Project No. 11-1 1143.100 The Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative mast review project excavations to verify removal of unsuitable material(s) and adequate hearing support of exposed soils. All such observations should occur prior to the placement of engineering Jill, or construction of footings and Jloor slabs. Probable excessive disturbance of existing native soils and/or localized zones with weak soils may require placement of a geotextile separation fabric for stabilization of construction (engineered fill, footing and/or floor slab construction). Comment and recommendations for materials and placement of geotextile are presented within the appendices. Fill required within the perimeter of the building should consist of a quality “pit run” sand or “sand & gravel”. Such imported fill should have 100 percent material passing the 1 '/2 inch sieve opening, no more than 80 percent passing the No. 4 U.S. sieve opening, no more than 40 percent materials passing the No. 40 U.S. Sieve opening, and no more than 10 percent material passing the No. 200 U.S. Sieve opening. Samples of the proposed fill material must be submitted to the Geotechnical Engineer of Record (GER) for approval prior to use of materials. All engineered fill for site corrective earthwork and for support ofproject footings should be tempered for moisture content, placed, and be compacted to the criteria presented within the appendices herein amended such that the fill is compacted to no less than 98 percent of the Standard proctor maximum dry density. 4.3 Foundations The following bearing recommendations are based on our understanding of the project. You should notify us of any changes made to the project size, location, design, or site grades so we can assess how such changes impact our recommendations. We assume foundation elements will impose maximum vertical loads as previously noted within this report. In our opinion, you may support the proposed House by founding strip footings and interior column footings on the above recommended geogrid and engineered fill section providing such construction complies with the criteria established within this report. We recommend all exterior foundations rest at common elevation, which places them on the same strata layer. You may design footings using the Table 2 maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures. Page 6 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. Minnesota NTl Project No. 11 -11 ]43.100 1Table 2: Recommended Maximum Net Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure CriteriaLocation Maximum of 2,000 psfPerimeter Strip Footings, Perimeter Columns’. Perimeter strip footings and perimeter column footing supported on natural soils or engineered fill below depth of frost penetration, and at an elevation as referenced within this report. Interior Strip Footings: Interior strip footings supported on natural, competent soils and/or engineered fill at a depth which provides no less than 6 inches of clearance between the top of footing and underside of floor slab (for sand cushion). Interior Column Footings: Supported on natural, competent soils and/or engineered fill at a depth which provides no less than 6 inches of clearance between the top of footing and underside of floor slab (for sand cushion). Maximum of 2,000 psf Maximum of 2,000 psf 1. Maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure recommendations predicated on footing design and construction complying with recommendations presented within this report. To minimize local failure of supporting soils, it is our opinion footing construction should comply with the International Building Code (IBC) requirements. We recommend placement of the base of basement or crawlspace footings (strip and column) at or near elevation 1362feet (Houston Engineering Datum) assuming the floor slab is placed at elevation of1363.5feet or higher. Construction should extend any miscellaneous at-grade footings to sufficient depth below ground (exposed slab) surface as protection against frost action. For this project, we recommend extending footings for at-grade footing construction to no less than 5 below final grades as protection against frost impacts (for permanently heated areas at 60 degrees Fahrenheit or above). Similarly, we recommend extending exterior footings or at grade footing construction to a minimum of 7 below the exterior ground surface in areas laeking permanent heat. Foundation walls will experience lateral loading from retained soils. This lateral loading may be modeled as an equivalent earth pressure applied to the foundation wall providing such complies with geometric conditions which support such modeling. We recommend using the Table 3 “at-resf ’ equivalent fluid pressure for design of respective below grade foundations. Table 3: Estimate of Equivalent Fluid Weight of Retained Soils “At Rest” Condition (pcf) “Active” Condition (pcf)Type of Retained Soil 80Unit Weight Sandy Clay (CL) of Equivalent Fluid * 100 Sand (SP, SP-SM)65 45 * The recommendations for equivalent fluid weight are based solely on assumed conditions with respect to sloping ground and/or surcharge loads. Design professional is cautioned that actual loads imparted to the structure will be dependent on soil conditions, site geometric considerations and surcharge loads imparted to the structure. Page 7 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. Minnesota NTI Project No. 1 l-l 1143.100 4.4 Bearing Factor of Safety and Estimate of Footing Settlement We estimate native soils provide a nominal 3 factor of safety against localized bearing failure when construction complies with report criteria and recommendations, and you design structure footings using the Table 2 maximum net allowable soil bearing recommendation(s). We also estimate that footings designed with the Table 2 maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure recommendations and loaded per report assumptions may experience long term, total settlement of approximately V2 to 1 inch with the upper estimate more probable. Likewise, project footings may experience differential settlement on the order of 25 to 50 percent of total settlement. Generally, the greatest differential settlement occurs between lightly loaded and heavily loaded footings, particularly if when heavily loaded interior column footings are located adjacent to lightly loaded strip footings. Furthermore, total and differential movement of footings and floor slabs could be significantly greater than the above estimates if you support construction on frozen soils, the moisture content of the bearing soils significantly changes from insitu conditions, and snow or ice lenses are incorporated into site earthwork. 4.5 Slab-on-Grade Floors Our borings indicate poor soils within the project interior and recommend removal of all unsuitable soils and materials as previously recommended for structure footings. We understand finished floor will be set at or near the prior referenced elevation and, conclude construction of at-grade floors will require fill placement interior to the structure perimeter. Fill placement for the floor slab may consist of native granular soils providing the granular materials provide 100 percent material passing the 1 inch sieve opening, no more than 90 percent material passing the No. 10 sieve, no more than 40 percent materials passing the No. 40 U.S. Sieve opening, and no more than 12 percent material passing the No. 200 U.S. Sieve opening. The granular fill should be tempered for moisture, should be placed and then compacted per the criteria established within the appendices. The final 6 inches of fill below the concrete floor slab should consist of a “pit run” or processed sand (sand cushion) with 100 percent material passing the 1 inch sieve opening, no more than 40 percent material passing the No. 40 U.S. Sieve opening, and no more than 5 percent material passing the No. 200 U.S. Sieve opening. The moisture content of the sand cushion should be tempered to the same limiting values as for the engineered granular fill. As placed, the sand cushion should be compacted until there is no more visually discemable settlement. We anticipate such compaction will be on the order of 95 percent of the standard proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: D 698-96). Design of the floor slab may be based on Page 8 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. MinnesotaNTI Project No. |l 1-11 143.100 j ^an estimated subgrade reaction modulus (k) of 100 Ibs/in . It is our opinion and we recommend that you reinforce floor slab construction for this project. Such need should be determined by the Structural Engineer of Record. All interior at-grade floors with impervious or near impervious surfacing such as, but not limited to, paint, hardening agent, vinyl tile, ceramic tile, or wood flooring, should include provision for installation of a vapor barrier system. Historically, vapor barrier systems can consist of many different types of synthetic membrane, and can be placed either below any sand cushion materials or at the underside of the concrete floor. All such issues are contentious and have both positive and negative aspects associated with long term performance of the floor system. Overall, we recommend that you install some form of vapor barrier belowjthe project at-grade floor. The type of vapor barrier and placement should be based on project specific issues. You should isolate floor slabs from other building components. It is our opinion such isolation should include installation of a Vi inch thick expansion joint between the floor and walls, and/or jcolumns to minimize binding between construction materials. This construction should also include application of a compatible sealant after curing of the floor slab to reduce moisture penetration though the expansion joint. As a minimum, you should include a bond breaker between the floor slab and foundation walls / columns to isolate and reduce binding between the components. 4.6 Exterior Backfill & Subsurface Drainage Exterior fill placement around the foundation and associated final grading adjacent to the building can Jsignificantly impact the performance of a structure. We understand the project will include basement construction or foundation walls which retain soils. You should install subsurface drainage at the base of basement foundation walls, or at-grade foundation vjalls to limit moisture accumulation within granular soils below interior floors. You should also consider placement of a separate subsurface drainage system exterior to perimeter foundation walls. The proposed house is to be built into the hill with possibility of a high groundwater level on the road side of the house. We recommend placement of a drainage zone on the roadside of the house to prevent water pressure buildup and possible seepage thro^ugh the wall. This system could consist of drainage rock backfill with drain tile extending around the house and day lighting between the house and lake. We also recommend redundant systems of water proofing to prevent any seepage through walls and floors. As a general guideline, such drainage consists of a geotextile and coarse drainage encased slotted or perforated pipe extending to sump basin(s) or if possible day lighted to low land. We recommend that exterior drainage be separated from interior drainage to reduce risk of cross flow and moisture infiltration below structure interior. Page 9 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTI Project No. 11-11143.100 Exterior backfill of at-grade foundations walls should consist of native, non-organic soils for at-grade construction. Placement of exterior backfill against at-grade foundation walls should be performed concurrent with interior backfill to minimize differential loading, rotation and/or movement of the wall system. Exterior backfill for basement foundation walls and/or retaining walls consist of a native, coarse alluvium or “pit run” granular soil with a fine content equal to or less than 12 percent passing the No. 200 US Sieve opening (i.e. fill extending to within 2 feet of final grade). The final one and one half to two feet of exterior backfill within lawn may consist of a coarse alluvium sand having increased fine content and topsoil. Exterior backfill within 2 feet of final grade and below sidewalks and pavements should consist of a free draining aggregate base as recommended for the respective construction. You should temper all backfill for correct moisture content and then place and compact individual lifts of exterior backfill per criteria presented within the appendix. You should limit placement of exterior backfill against below grade foundations until lateral restraint of the foundation walls has been installed to the satisfaction of the structural engineer. Final grading of exterior backfill should provide sufficient grade for positive drainage from structure. We presented within other report section recommendations for final grading. 4.7 Surface Drainage You should maintain positive drainage during and after construction of project and eliminate ponding of water on site soils. We recommend that you include provisions within construction documents for positive drainage of site. You should install sumps at critical areas around project excavations to assist in removal of seepage and runoff from site. We present recommendations for sump construction within appendices. We understand sidewalks, curbing, pavements, and lawn will direct drainage from structure. You should grade exterior to slope from building(s). We recommend that you provide a 5 percent gradient within 10 feet of building for drainage from lawn, and 2 percent minimum gradient from building for drainage of sidewalks / pavements. All pavements should drain to on-site storm collection, municipal collection system, or roadside ditching. You should direct roof runoff from building by a system of interior roof and scupper drains, or rain gutters, down spouts and splash pads. It is our opinion interior roof drains plumbed directly to the storm water piping system provide the most favorable method of conveying drainage from the roof as interior drains do not freeze or discharge runoff onto exterior sidewalks and pavements. Page 10 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, MinnesotaNTI Project No.j 11-11143.100 I 4.8 Utilities Utility trendies should be backfilled with native soils placed in 6-inch maximum depth loose lifts. It is especially important that trench backfill for utility construction be compacted to minimize future settlement of lawn and pavement areas. We recommend that such soils be compacted to no less than 90 percent of the standard proctor maximum dry density for non- paved locations, and to respective appendices attachment compaction criteria for areas which receive pavement (i.e. sidewalks and driveways). We anticipate the building will require extension of underground utilities for water and sanitary service, electrical, natural gas, and phone services. Localized pumping of ground water or site (dewatering may be necessary for underground utility installation with such dependent on local conditions and necessary project requirements. The stability of embankments along utility excavations is dependent on soil strength, site geometry, moisture content, and any surcharge load for excavated soils and equipment. Cautionary comment on excavation stability is provided within other report sections. We herein note that the Contractor is solely responsible for assessing the stability of and executing underground utility and project excavations using safe methods. Contractor is also responsible for naming the “competent individual” as per Subpart P of 29 CFR 1926.6 (Federal Register - OSHA). I There is a high probability that mixed to fine alluvium laminations and/or seams and isolated zones of cohesive soils may be present along utility trench and across project excavations. Such formations and other regional dependent soil conditions may confine and /or direct ground water to excavations. While it is our opinion small pumps should handle seepage resulting from utility construction, we caution that interception of a major water bearing stratum may [result in significantly greater seepage into utility excavations. Therefore, we recommend that you include provisions within construction document for pumping of seepage from utility excavations. 4.9 Future Storage Garage We understand there are future plans to construct a stand alone storage garage to the south of the proposed house. We understand that excavation to the depths proposed for the house is not feasible for the garage. We therefore provide the following suggestions for construction of the garage; Page 11 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota NTl Project No. 11-11143.100 a. Excavate to a depth of 3 I/2 feet below slab/footing with placement of a geogrid reinforced fill section. The excavation should be oversized at a 1 to 1 from the outside edge of the footing / slab. We recommend placement of two layers of geogrid reinforcement below footing and floor slab construction. Geogrid reinforcement shall consist of TriAx ® material as manufactured by Tensar International. The geogrid should be placed at depths of 1 and 2 feet below the bottom of footing / floor slab. The layer of geogrid placed 2 feet below the footing should be placed parallel to the long length of the garage with the 1 foot layer being placed perpendicular to the long length of the garage. Panels of grid should be overlapped a minimum of 6 inches and zip tied to prevent separation of the panels during fill placement. Care must be taken to prevent any slack in the geogrid layer as this will negate the strength of the geogrid. b. The finished floor should be placed approximately 1 foot above existing grade to allow for settlement of the structure. c. Use a heavily reinforced thickened edge slab with a minimum two foot tall reinforced concrete wall acting as a grade beam. d. Extension of headers above doors and windows to provide additional lateral support. The above are only suggestions for the proposed garage and note that the owner must assume all risk with construction of the garage above the peat layer known to exist below grade at the location of the garage. 5.0. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1. Excavation Stability Excavation depth and sidewall inclination should not exceed those specified in local, state or federal regulations. Excavations may need to be widened and sloped, or temporarily braced, to maintain or develop a safe work environment. Also, contractors should comply with local, state, and federal safety regulations including current OSHA excavation and trench safety standards. Temporaiy shoring must be designed in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. 5.2. Engineered Fill & Winter Construction The Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative should observe and evaluate excavations to verify removal of uncontrolled fills, topsoil and/or unsuitable material(s), and adequacy of bearing support of exposed soils. Such observation should occur prior to construction of foundations or placement of engineered fill supporting excavations. Page 12 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. MinnesotaNTI Project No. Il-Hr43.l00 Engineered fill should be evaluated by above designated representative for moisture content, mechanical analysis and/or Atterberg limits prior to placement. You should temper engineered fill for correct moisture content and then place and compact individual lifts of engineered fill to criteria established within the appendices. Frozen soil should never be used as engineered fill or backfill nor should you support foundations on frozen soils. Moisture freezing within the soil matrix of fine grained and/or cohesive soils produces ice lenses. Such soils gain moisture from capillary action and, with continued growth, heave with formation of ice lenses within the soil matrix. Foundations constructed on frozen soils settle at or after thaw if ice lenses. You should protect excavations and foundations from freezing conditions or accumulation of snow, and remove frozen soils, snow, and ice from within excavations, fill section or from below proposed foundations. Replacement soils should consist of similar materials as those removed from the excavation with moisture content, placement and compaction conforming to report criteria. Operation of Project Sumps5.3. We previously noted the importance of removal of seepage and runoff from project excavations. You should install and continuously operate sumps, temporary subsurface drainage pipe, and/or collection manifold and vacuum wells for removal of seepage and runoff from project. We present within the report appendices recommendations for project sumps. 6.0 CLOSURE Our conclusions and recommendations are predicated on observation and testing of the earthwork directed by Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Our opinions are based on data assumed representative of the site. Flowever, the area coverage of borings in relation to the entire project is very small. For this and other reasons, we do not warrant conditions below the depth of our borings, or that the strata logged from our borings are necessarily typical of the site. Deviations from our recommendations by plans, written specifications, or field applications shall relieve us of responsibility unless our written concurrence with such deviations has been established. Page 13 Cullen Lake Home Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas. Minnesota NTI Project No. ll-l 1143.100 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Terry Becker Construction, Inc. for specific application to the proposed Cullen Lake Home in Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota. Northern Technologies, Inc. has endeavored to comply with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice common to the local area. Northern Technologies, Inc. makes no other warranty, expressed or implied. Northern Technologies, Inc. I herby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Dan Gibson, P.E. Project Engineer Marc D. Shannon, P.E. President Daniel T. Gibson, P.E. Date: 6/29/11 Reg. No. 48076 DG:ms Attachments F:\PROJECTS\Geo\GEOREP 201 l\Cullen Lake Home\Report.doc Page 14 APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF RECOVERED SOIL SAMPLES We visually examined recovered soil samples to estimate distribution of grain sizes, plasticity, consistency, moisture condition, color, presence of lenses and seams, and apparent geologic origin. We then classified the soils according using the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2488). A chart describing this classification system and general notes explaining soil sampling procedures are presented within appendices attachments. The stratification depth lines between soil types on the logs are estimated based on the available data. Insitu, the transition between type(s) may be distinct or gradual in either the horizontal or vertical directions. The soil conditions have been established at our specific boring locations only. Variations in the soil stratigraphy may occur between and around the borings, with the nature and extent of such change not readily evident until exposed by excavation. These variations must be properly assessed when utilizing information presented on the boring logs. We request that you, your design team or contractors contact NTI immediately if local conditions differ from those assumed by this report, as we would need to review how such changes impact our recommendations. Such contact would also allow us to revise our recommendations as necessary to account for the changed site conditions. FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES Soil Sampling - Standard Penetration Boring: Soil sampling was performed according to the procedures described by ASTM D-1586. Using this procedure, a 2 inch O.D. split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 pound weight falling 30 inches. After an initial set of six inches, the number of blows required to drive the sampler an additional 12 inches is recorded (known as the penetration resistance (i.e. “N-value”) of the soil at the point of sampling. The N-value is an index of the relative density of cohesionless soils and an approximation of the consistency of cohesive soils. Soil Sampling - Power Auger Boring: The boring(s) was/were advanced with a 6 inch nominal diameter continuous flight auger. As a result, samples recovered from the boring are disturbed, and our determination of the depth, extend of various stratum and layers, and relative density or consistency of the soils is approximate. Soil Classification: Soil samples were visually and manually classified in general conformance with ASTM D-2488 as they were removed from the sampler(s). Representative tractions of soil samples were then sealed within respective containers and returned to the laboratory for further examination and verification of the field classification. In addition, select samples were submitted for laboratory tests. Individual sample information, identification of sampling methods, method of advancement of the samples and other pertinent information concerning the soil samples are presented on boring logs and related report attachments. General Notes DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS DEFINITION LABORATORY TEST SYMBOLS SYMBOL DEFINITIONSYMBOL c.s.Continuous Sampling 2-3/8” Pipe Drill Cleanout Tube Moisture content-percent of dry weight Dry Density-pounds per cubic foot Liquid and plastic limits determined in accordance with ASTM D 423 and D 424 Unconfined compressive strength-pounds per square foot in accordance with ASTM D 2166-66 W P.D.D C.O.LL, PL 3HSA 3 1/4” l.D. Hollow Stem Auger Qu 4 FA 4” Diameter Flight Auger 6” Diameter Flight Auger 2 'A” Casing 4” Casing Drilling Mud Jet Water Hand Auger Size NX Casing Size BX Casing Size AX casing 2” O.D. Split Spoon Sample 2” Thin Wall Tube Sample 3” Thin Wall Tube Sample 6 FA 2 'AC 4C Additional insertions in Qu Column Penetrometer reading-tons/square foot Torvane reading-tons/square foot Specific Gravity - ASTM D 854-58 Shrinkage limit - ASTM 427-61 Hydrogen ion content-meter method Organic content-combustion method Grain size analysis One dimensional consolidation Triaxial Compression * See attached data Sheet and/or graph D.M.Pq J.W.S H.A.G NXC SL BXC pH AXC O M.A.*SS 2T C* Qc*3T Water Level Symbol Water levels shown on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the time and under the conditions indicated. In sand, the indicated levels can be considered reliable ground water levels. In clay soils, it is not possible to determine the ground water level within the normal scope of a test boring investigation, except where lenses or layers of more pervious water bearing soil is present and then a long period of time may be necessary' to reach equilibrium. Therefore, the position of the water level symbol for cohesive or mixed soils may not indicate the true level of the ground water table. The available water level information is given at the bottom of the log sheet. Descriptive Termindloby DENSITY CONSISTENCY TERM Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Standard “N” Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon. “N”VALUE TERM “N”VALUE 0-4 Soft 0-4 5-8 Medium Rather Stiff Stiff 5-8 9- 15 16-30 Over 30 9-15 16-30 Over 30Very Stiff Relative PRapoRTioNS Particle Sizes Boulders Gravel - Coarse Medium Sand - Coarse Medium Fine Silt and Clay Note: Sieve sizes are U.S. Standard. Over 3”TERMS Trace A little Some With RANGE 0-5% 5-15% 15-30% 30-50% y4”-3” #4-Y4” #4 -#10 #10-#40 #40 - #200 Determined by plasticity characteristics. 4 • CLABSIFICATiaN OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES ASTM Designation D-2487 and D 2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) Group Symbols Classification CriteriaTypical NamesMajor Divisions Well -graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines^______________ Cu - Deo / Dio Cz = (Deo)^ / (Dio X Deo)greater than 4. between 1 & 3.GW§>m oO(0 .ilSI .miIsgfl Poorly graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines^______________ oi g« o ^ o 6 <D Z1°|ol sil Not meeting both criteria for GW materials.GPo Atterberg limits below “A” line, or P.l. iess than 4. Silty gravels, gravel- sand-sllt mixtures. Atterberg limits plotting in hatched area are borderline ciassifications requiring use of dual symbols. GM Atterberg limits above “A" line with P.l. greater than 7. Cu = Deo / Diogreater than 6. Cz = (Doo)^ / (Dio X Deo) between 1 & 3. 1 -2 c C3 il >Clayey gravels, gravel- sand-clay mixtures. Q>O)GC(/)45o C\J S 6 ^ g s.Si§ 2 .2 « o O o Well-graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines. 6 *o swz 0>CO<B >u> 0> n «So ^Z g gS g S £ ■S “ O 1 gc rS 1 S £ •gg 2-3 £ o oo s Poorly-graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines. IS w ^ 0>t |l'i I ■s ^ ^ " W I/) O«|ls III! Not meeting both criteria for SW materials.SP£ CJ w Atterberg limits below “A" line, or P.l. less than 4. Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures.Atterberg limits plotting in hatched area are borderline classifications requiring use of dual symbols. SMis Atterberg limits above "A" line with P.l. greater than 7.1,1CO u_ Clayey sands, sand- clay mixtures.sc Inorganic silts, very tine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands. Plasticity index ChartML o 60 Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays.________________ 3 g ill Chari lerclaadflcationolflnegialriedaollt and the fin tract Ion erf eoarae grained slls50 --CL AtlerbergLirnlaplollinginhatehBdaieaara borderllnactadficationaieguiringiaeot dual RRibola•■= 40 --.iOrganic silts and organic silty clays of low plastic!^. OL .■? 30 [CL SoilsInorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silts, elastic silts._______________ v>«]o Q. 20MHV) o CsJ 10%% " iS o>O ■o .i C —I (0 CL-ML Solisd Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Zi OlSMLSollSZCH0TT<AQ>0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 jj) </> % as0 Q. |s1 g6 s Liquid Limit (o5g Organic clays of medium to high plasticity.OH •a % O CO Peat, muck and other highly organic soils.pt£V E I • ► Excavation Oversize Excavation oversize facilitates distribution of load induced stress within supporting soils. Unless otherwise superseded by report specific requirements, all construction should conform to the minimum oversize and horizontal offset requirements OiExcavation Bactrs/ope iiteram and associated Horizontal Offset A (Refer to Notel)(Refer to Chart) iIBackfill Surface & Soils, Refer to report for specific material type and placement IOversize Ratio H (Refer to Chart)I I •i Structure and/or BasementI III ?•I Unsuitable Soils (I.e. Excavated Materials), Refer to Chart and report for requirements. m- Depth D: Engineered Fill, Refer to report for^------material type and placement criteria. Competent Soils (i.e. acceptable for support of embankment and structure). Refer to report for specific requirements. Definitions Oversize Ratio H: The ratio of the horizontal distance divided by the engineered fill depth (i.e. # Horizontal / Depth D). Refer to Chart for specific requirements. Horizontal Offset A: The horizontal distance between the outside edge of footing or critical position and the crest of the engineered fill section. Refer to Chart for specific requirements. Note 1: Excavation depth and sidewall inclination should not exceed those specified in local, state or federal regulations including those defined by Subpart P of Chapter 27, 29 CFR Part 1926 (of Federal Register). Excavations may need to be widened and sloped, or temporarily braced, to maintain or develop a safe work environment. Horizontal Offset A Oversize Ratio HConditionUnsuitable Soil Type Foundation Unit Load equal SP, SM soils, CL & CH soils with 2 feet or width of footing, to or less than 3,000 psf cohesion greater than 1,000 psf whichever is greater Equal to or greater than Depth D Foundation Unit Load greater than 3,000 psf SP, SM soils, CL & CH soils with 5 feet or width of footing, cohesion less than 1,000 psf Equal to or greater than Depth Dwhichever is greater 2 feet or width of footing, whichever is greater Equal to or greater than two (2) time Depth D Foundation Unit Load equal Topsoil or Peat to or less than 3,000 psf Foundation Unit Load greater than 3,000 psf 5 feet or width of footing, whichever is greater Equal to or greater than two (2) time Depth D Topsoil or Peat APPENDIX B GROUND WATER ISSUES The following presents additional comment and soil specific issues related to measurement of ground water conditions at your project site. Note that our ground water measurements, or lack thereof, will vary depending on the time allowed for equilibrium to occur in the borings. Extended observation time was not available during the scope of the field exploration program and, therefore, ground water measurements as noted on the borings logs may or may not accurately reflect actual conditions at your site. Seasonal and yearly fluctuations of the ground water level, if any, occur. Perched ground water may be present within sand and silt lenses bedded within cohesive soil formations. Groundwater typically exists at depth within cohesive and cohesionless soils. Documentation of the local ground water surface and any perched ground water conditions at the project site would require installation of temporary piezometers and extended monitoring due to the relatively low permeability exhibited by the site soils. We have not performed such ground water evaluation due to the scope of services authorized for this project. We anticipate pumps installed within temporary sumps should control subsurface seepage from perched conditions. However, we caution such seepage from such formations and any water entry from excavations below the ground water table may be heavy and will vary based on seasonal and annual precipitation, and ground related impacts in the vicinity of the project. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC Unless otherwise amended by our report, we recommend installation of a geotextile separation fabric between the native soils and the engineered fill section below project foundations, floors and/or between a clay subgrade and aggregate base of pavement construction. It is our opinion this geotextile should consist of a non-woven, needle punched, fabric with a minimum grab tensile strength in both directions equal to or greater than 200 lbs minimum average roll value (MARV, ASTM D 4632). We recommend that the geotextile panels be oriented parallel with proposed aggregate placement activities, and occur in such a manor that the overall number of individual panels are kept to a minimum. As placed, individual panels of geotextile should have a width equal to or greater than 12 feet. We recommend that the Contractor overlap longitudinal and butt seams of adjacent panels a minimum of 18 inches with such joints oriented to follow initial construction traffic (shingles profile with traffic). PLACEMENT and COMPACTION OF ENGINEERED FILL Unless otherwise superseded within the body of the Geotechnical Exploration Report, the following criteria shall be utilized for placement of engineered fill on project This includes, but is not limited to earthen fdl placement to improve site grades, fill placed below structural footings, fill placed interior of structure, and fill placed as backfill offoundations. Engineered fill placed for construction, if necessary should consist of natural, non-organic, competent soils native to the project area. Such soils may include, but are not limited to gravel, sand, or clays with Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2488) classifications of GW, SP, SM, CL or CH. Use of silt or clayey silt as project fill will require additional review and approval of project Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Such soils have USCS classifications of ML, MH, ML-CL, MH-CH. Use of topsoil, marl, peat, other organic soils construction debris and/or other unsuitable materials as fill is not allowed. Such soils have USCS classifications of OL, OH, Pt. Engineered fill, classified as clay, should be tempered such that the moisture content at the time of placement is equal to and no more than 3 percent above the optimum content for as defined by the appropriate proctor test. Likewise, engineered fill classified as gravel or sand should be tempered such that the moisture content at the time of placement is within 3 percent of the optimum content. All engineered fill for construction should be placed in individual 8 inch maximum depth lifts. Each lift of fill should be compacted by large vibratory equipment until the in-place soil density is equal to or greater than the criteria established within the following tabulation. Compaction Criteria (% respective Proctor) Sand or GravelType of Construction Clay General Embankment Fill Engineered Fill below Foundations Engineered Fill below Floor Slabs Engineered Fill placed against Foundation Walls Engineered Fill placed as Pavement Subgrade Engineered Fill placed as Pavement Aggregate Base Engineered Fill placed within Utility Trench (to within 3 feet of pavement aggregate base or final grade Engineered Fill placed as Utility Trench Fill (within 3 feet of pavement aggregate base or final grade Min.95 Min. 95 Min. 95 95 to 100 Min. 95 95 to 98 95 to 98 Min. 95 95 to 100 Min.95 Min. 98 Min. 95 NA Min. 95 Min.98Min.98 Note 1 Unless otherwise required, compaction criteria shall be based on the Standard Proctor Test (ASTM D698). Density tests should be taken during engineered fill placement to document earthwork has achieved necessary compaction of the material(s). Recommendations for interior fill placement and backfill of foundation walls are presented within other sections of this report. i PROJECT SUMPS The collection, control and removal of seepage and runoff from within project excavations is critical in maintaining the bearing capacity of native soils, in-place density of engineered fill and stability of embankments at project excavations. As constructed, it is our opinion all sumps should consist of a 2 foot by 2 foot or larger plan dimension excavation(s) located adjacent to and directly exterior to the excavation oversize limit for structural engineered fill. Sump excavations should extend a minimum of 2 feet below the base of the excavation for collection of seepage and runoff All sumps should be lined with a non-woven, needle-punched, geotextile having a grab tensile strength equal to or greater than 70 pounds per square inch (psi). A standpipe of 12 inches in diameter or larger should be centered within the sump excavation. This pipe should include sufficient openings for entry of seepage. We recommend that the standpipe extend to the ground surface to facilitate pumping during project construction. Infill within the sump area should consist of a 1 'A to % inch clear rock placed between the standpipe and walls of the sump excavation. Pumping of sump(s) should continue until completion of the construction or until the Geotechnical Engineer of Record indicates such pumping is no longer necessary for stability of the project footings and related construction. Sumps should be abandoned per methods required by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record and per Federal, State and local governmental statutes. Discharge from sumps should be directed away from site and be disposed within storm water systems or other systems which comply with Federal, State and local governmental statute. As constructed and operated, the General Contractor should be responsible for all permits, operation and abandonment of sumps or other temporary dewatering systems. APPENDIX C s, ^—' r""1^1''I i 1 I iI—I I □1 I S: ___£j ns VA V:of' " \j,C^ke b®’ BORING NUMBER SB-1 PAGE 1 OF 1Northern Technologies, Inc CLIENT Terry Becker Construction, Inc.PROJECT NAME Cullen Lake Home PROJECT NUMBER 11-11143.100 PROJECT LOCATION Scalp Lake - Rural Verges, Minnesota DATE STARTED 6/9/11 COMPLETED 6/9/11 GROUND ELEVATION 1366.8 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: 2 at time of drilling 8.0 ft/Elev 1358.8 ft I AT END OF DRILLING 5.0 ft/Elev 1361.8 ft AFTER DRILLING --__________________ HOLE SIZE 6 1/2'' DRILUNG CONTRACTOR NTI DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4" H.S.A. LOGGED BY JT CHECKED BY DG NOTES Cave in: 5 1/2' ATTERBERG LIMITS r-LJJ Z55ZUJ &Q.LU5CO LU o z LU>>- a:H LU LLI COii Ha:Q.X 0^H ZtZ)I-OzLUtif o ci'Q.9b b D zMATERIAL DESCRIPTION >QO O z 50 Fb§i CO 1Q CO(Jo >COo Z LUoccLUq!3<oa:Q.Qto Q.LL0 Fill, Silty Sand with surface organics, fine to medium grained, brown^SS 3-4-4Fill, Clayey Sand, fine to medium grained, brown and gray 1 (8) SS 3-3-3 (6)2 5 SS 0-1-1f. Burled Topsoil, Orgainic silt and clay, black (OL)3 (2) -U '1^ h ~ til 0__ Hemic Peat, Black (PT) SS 0-3-5 4 (8) Clayey Sand with Peat, Gray and Dark Gray, wet (PT-SC)SS 4-5-6 (11)5 Sand, fine to mediurn grained, trace of gravel, gray, water bearing, loose (SP-SM)SS 1^-4 6 (8) Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace of gravel, gray, medium dense (SP)15 SS 4-4-6 (10)7 W-Clayey Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace of gravel, gray, loose (SP-SC)Ss Si20 SS 4-4-4D%8 (8)Si Bottom of hole at 21.0 feet.o E!CDCOCDg 2 3 Ido £ 5 2CD *. BORING NUMBER SB-27Vi^ ^B Northern Technologies, Inc PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Cullen Lake HomeCLIENT Terry Becker Construction, Inc. PROJECT LOCATION Scalp Lake - Rural Veroas, MinnesotaPROJECT NUMBER 11-11143.100 HOLE SIZE 6 1/2"GROUND ELEVATION 1366.5 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: S AT TIME OF DRILLING 12.0ft/Elev 1354.5 ft X AT END OF DRILLING 5.0 ft / Elev 1361.5 ft AFTER DRILLING --_____________________ COMPLETED 6/9/11DATE STARTED 6/9/11 DRILUNG CONTRACTOR NTI DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4" H.S.A. CHECKED BY DGLOGGED BY JT NOTES Cave in: 6' ATTERBERG LIMITS I-LU Zujgz0.UJ5CO LUg ^ -81 LU>-O >H LU ii HClXZtD |2 zHLUmf 0 3“ O ^I-itz>QMATERIAL DESCRIPTION OZ20 Pt=>a=LU i?CO b a1 COQOu>-^5 COo LUoa:a!LU 5<oa:CL Qw 0-Li.0 Fill, Clayey Sand with surface organics, fine to medium grained, brown and gray SS 4-4-4 (8)1 Fill, Sandy Clay with organics, dark gray, brown, and black SS 3-3-3 (6)2 SS 1-1-25 3 (3) tc 0 “ 'l til ■'111 'l '111 ^ 0 'l 'Ul ill iii 'i ill SS 2-2-4Hemic Peat, Black (PT)(6)4 SS 1-1-110 (2)5 SS 2-2-3Clayey Sand with Peat, Gray and Dark Gray, wet (PT-SC)(5)6 Sand, trace of wood, fine to medium grained, trace of gravel, gray, water bearing, loose (SP-SM) SS 3-2-315 7 (5)Sand, fine to coarse grained, trac» of gravel, gray, medium dense (SP) SS SS 7-6-620o8(12) h Bottom of hole at 21.0 feet.5 2 COog 5 3 I do 5 KSo BORING NUMBER SB-3 CmTechnologies, Inc PAGE 1 OF 1 CLIENT Terry Becker Construction, Inc.PROJECT NAME Cullen Lake Home PROJECT NUMBER 11-11143,100 PROJECT LOCATION Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, Minnesota DATE STARTED 6/9/11 COMPLETED 6/9/11 GROUND ELEVATION 1369.1 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: 2 at TIME OF DRILUNG 12.0ft/Elev 1357.1 ft 't- AT END OF DRILLING 6.0ft/Elev 1363.1 ft AFTER DRILLING _____________________ HOLE SIZE 6 1/2'' DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4" H.S.A. LOGGED BY JT_______________CHECKED BY DG NOTES Cave in: 6' ATTERBERG LIMITS KLUZzQ.Lit CO LU illo z LitO>->* a:H LU II I-Q.X K Zz>I-yzLU 8sQ.I-iiz O X h: D MATERIAL DESCRIPTION >QO O z 50 l-tCO1Q COOo>-COO LUOLUq!3<oa:D.Q(/)0.U.0 Fill, Clayey Sand with surface organics, fine to medium grained, \ brown and gray____________________________SS 3-4-4 (8)1Fill, Sandy Clay with organics, dark gray, brown, and black SS 4-6-7 (13)2 5 SS 3-3-3 3 (6) ■ oi O' -I, ^ •LU L U LU " 0'/ 0 LU it U LU , Hemic Peat, Black (PT) SS 5-3-3 (6)4 SS 3-3-2 5 (5) SS 0-1-2LU L Clayey Sand with Peat, Gray and Dark Gray, wet (PT-SC)6 (3) Clayey Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace of gravel, gray, wet, loose(SC) 15 SS 3-3-3 7 (6) S' 1 Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace of gravel, gray, medium dense (SP) £ 20 SS 6-8-7D(15)8 z Bottom of hole at 21.0 feet.5 2 COog 2 5 S du£ 5 So BORING NUMBER SB<4 PAGE 1 OF 1Northern Technologies, Inc CLIENT Terry Becker Construction, Inc.PROJECT NAME Cullen Lake Home PROJECT LOCATION Scalp Lake - Rural Verges, MinnesotaPROJECT NUMBER 11-11143.100 HOLE SIZE 6 1/2"GROUND ELEVATION 1367 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: 2 at TIME OF DRILLING 11.0 ft / Elev 1356.0 ft I AT END OF DRILLING 4.0 ft / Elev 1363.0 ft AFTER DRILLING _____________________ COMPLETED 6/9/11DATE STARTED 6/9/11 DRILLING CONTRACTOR _NH DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4" H.S.A. CHECKED BY _DGLOGGED BY JT NOTES Cave in: 4' ATTERBERG LIMITS I-LU Zmg.Q_LU5CO LU^ =3luoz LU>h- LU LU CQSi I-q:CLa:HX ZtZ)9zI-LU ll:s 8£O X b a Z>QMATERIAL DESCRIPTION wLU O Z 50 i-bz>S>iiQgm (0 1 (OQOo>-<COo LUoC£.LU 3<Q.OccCLQW CL U.0 Fill, Clayey Sand with surface organics, fine to medium grained,~~\ brown and gray________________ Fill, Sandy Clay with organics, dark gray, brown, and black SS 3-3-3 (6)1 SS 5-7-5 2 (12) SS 3-3-45 (7)3 SS 1-2-2 h •y, U 'll' '12 ^ 2 11 ^ 12 1 Hemic Peat, Black (PT)(4)4 SS 1-2-210(4)5 SS 1-1-1 (2)6 12 1 2 12 12 1 2 12 Silty Clay with Peat, Gray and Dark Gray, wet (PT-CH) SS 0-0-015 (0)7 Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace of gravel, gray, wet, loose (SP) SS SS 7-7-920o(16)8 I- o Sand, fine to coarse grained, with gravel, gray, dense (SP) 2 (/)og 5 SS 9-9-1025 3 (19)9 w Bottom of hole at 26.0 feet. do £ gij 2O BORING NUMBER SB-5 PAGE 1 OF 1Northern Technologies, Inc PROJECT NAME Cullen Lake HomeCLIENT Terry Becker Construction. Inc. PROJECT LOCATION Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, MinnesotaPROJECT NUMBER 11-11143.100 HOLE SIZE 6 1/2"GROUND ELEVATION 1369.2 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: ^ AT TIME OF DRILLING 6.5 ft / Elev 1362.7 ft I AT END OF DRILLING 6.0 ft / Elev 1363.2 ft AFTER DRILLING ____________________ COMPLETED 6/9/11DATE STARTED 6/9/11 DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4" H.S.A. CHECKED BY DGLOGGED BY JT NOTES Cave in: 6' ATTERBERG LIMITS HZzLU SQ_LU CO LJJ U Z LU>“ LU li HCLCCIzbZ)zHLU 8sSto?<IS zMATERIAL DESCRIPTION >Q m'H O z SO i-b5S UJ§i PCO1 D COQa<□o >-COo LUOLU3<oOLQ.Qw CL LL0 Fill, Clayey Sand with surface organics, fine to medium grained\ brown and gray________________________________________ Sand, fine to medium grained, trace of gravel, brown, medium dense and dense (SP-SM) ' r ss 3-3-3 (6)1 ss 7-7-8 2 (15) ss 7-9-95 3 (18) %e SS 10-6-4 (10)4 ss 5-6-610 (12)5Sand, fine to coarse grained, some gravei, brown, dense (SP) SS 15-12-10 (22)6 SS 9-9-1015 (19)7 Sand, fine to coarse grained, some gravel, gray, dense (SP) £ £ SS 12-11-920□(20)8 w K Bottom of hole at 21.0 feet. o 2 q(0og 3 W Ido£ gm 2 » u' BORING NUMBER SB-6 PAGE 1 OF 1Northern Technologies, Inc PROJECT NAME Cullen Lake HomeCLIENT Tenv Becker Constoiction, Inc. PROJECT LOCATION Scalp Lake - Rural Vergas, MinnesotaPROJECT NUMBER 11-11143.100 HOLE SIZE 6 1/2"GROUND ELEVATION 1367.7 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: 2 at time of drilling 8.0 ft/Elev 1359.7 ft T AT END OF DRILLING 8.0 ft / Elev 1359.7 ft AFTER DRILLING ____________________ COMPLETED 6/9/11DATE STARTED 6/9/11 DRILUNG CONTRACTOR JTH DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4" H.S.A. CHECKED BY DGLOGGED BY JT NOTES Cave in: 8' ATTERBERG LIMITS I-UJ 22UJ SQ.UJ§w uT gig"8| LU>-9 >- ccH LU lu CDii f-CCClCCX 2t |2 9zI-LU 8g9b2>QMATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0220 FbQ£.UJ p w 1 b: D CODOO>-<COo UJoa:LU 3<soQ.QW 0.U.0 Fill, Clayey Sand with surface organics, fine to medium grained, brown and gray SS 3-4-4 (8)1Fill, Sandy Clay v/ith organics, dark gray, brown, and black SS 4-^-4 2 (8) SS 2-1-25 3 (3) 0 */ V )Li' 01. 1 01 0'/ 0 Hemic Peat, Black (PT) SS 3-4-3 4 (7) SS 5-3-310Clayey Sand with a trace of organics, fine to coarse grained, gray and dark gray, wet (SC)5 (6) SS 3-2-2Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace of gravel, gray, loose to dense (SP)6 (4) SS 1-3-315 (6)7 SCM£ SS 8-9-920Q8(18)w K Bottom of hole at 21.0 feet.o Rq(0CD g g 3 S Oo 5 K2CD i 7f0O>. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .......................................................... — S 'dJf V7^77ib^:;VVii 9*o>i > <e*I/ l>.fO' >:\...I...... i s J~S-\ [ 4- z:zE^! i T r I ! ! ^ \ \ n A ^-- i k 0 ir GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG PROJECT TITLE: PROPOSED LOT 3 BLOCK 2 SCALP LAKE ACRES - RURAL VERGUS, MINNESOTA PROJ. NUMBER: 08-10213.100 BORING NUMBER: SB-1 SAMPLE DATA LABORATORY TESTSDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALDEPTH (feet)GEOLOGIC ORIGIN QuLLDWLNNOTYPEWPLfasurface elevation: 86.9 TOPSOILTOPSOIL, ORGANIC, SILTY LEAN CLAY, BLACK (OL) FILL, SANDY LEAN CLAY, TRACE OF GRAVEL, BROWN FA1/2 1FILL 18 SS -/1.82 5 SS -/1.13 7 HEMIC PEAT, DARK BROWN TO BLACK (PI)SWAMP DEPOSIT SS -/ 1.044 SS -/0.535 12 BURIED TOPSOIL, ORGANIC, SANDY, LEAN CLAY, TRACE OF GRAVEL, SOFT (OL) .BURIED.TORSOIL.SS -/0.316 SS -/0.22715LEAN CLAY, WITH PEAT, LIGHT GRAY TO DARK GRAY, SOFT (Pt/CL) MARL____ ▼8 SS820CLAYEY GRAVEL, GRAY, WET, VERY LOOSE (GC)MIXED ALLUVIUM 21■; END OF BORING Boring terminated at 21 feet. Bore hole filled with soil cuttings after retrieval of hollow stem auger. Cave-in Depth; 2 feet. Depth of Frost; NA DATE:WATER TABLE MEASUREMENTS DATE:9/9/2008 METHOD OF DRILLING:3%"H.S,A. 0 to 19 1/2 ftNo measurable groundwater encountered during or at completion of boring.9/9/08 J, BROOKSCREWCHIEF: % * GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG /- PROPOSED LOT 3 BLOCK 2 SCALP LAKE ACRES - RURAL VERGUS, MINNESOTA08-10213.100PROJECT TITLE: PROJ. NUMBER:BORING NUMBER: SB-2 SAMPLE DATA LABORATORY TESTSDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALDEPTH (feet)GEOLOGIC ORIGIN QuLLNOWLNTYPEWDPLfa.surface elevation; 86.4 TOPSOILTOPSOIL, ORGANIC. SILTY LEAN CLAY, BLACK (OL)1/2 FA1FILL, SANDY LEAN CLAY, TRACE OF GRAVEL, LIGHT BROWN FILL 2 SS -/1.47 SS3 -/ 1.14 6 HEMIC PEAT, DARK BROWN TO BLACK (Pt)SWAMP DEPOSIT SS -/1.744 SS25 -/0.5 I12 1/2 SS2 6 -/0.6SANDY LEAN CLAY, TRACE OF GRAVEL, GRAY, WET, SOFT (CL) COLLAPSED GLACIAL SEDIMENT 15 SS -/0.417SILTY LEAN CLAY, GRAY, SOFT (CL) SS48 21 END OF BORING z Boring terminated at 21 feet. Bore fioie filied with soil cuttings after retrieval of hollow stem auger. Cave-in Depth: 2 feet. Depth of Frost: NA DATE:WATER TABLE MEASUREMENTS DATE;9/9/2008 9/9/08 Measurable groundwater encountered at 12.5 feet at completion of boring.METHOD OF DRILLING:3’/V'H.S.A. 0 to 19 1/2 ft J. BROOKSCREW CHIEF: WeBTTWgHW 4 > .j GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG PROJECT TITLE: PROPOSED LOT 3 BLOCK 2 SCALP LAKE ACRES - RURAL VERGUS, MINNESOTA PROJ. NUMBER: 08-10213.100 BORING NUMBER: SB-3 LABORATORY TESTSSAMPLE DATADESCRIPTION OF MATERIALDEPTH (feet)GEOLOGIC ORIGIN LL QuNOTYPEWDWLNPLfasurface elevation: 66.3 TOPSOILTOPSOIL, ORGANIC, SILTY LEAN CLAY, BLACK (OL) FILL, SLTY FINE TO COARSE SAND, BROWN FA11/2 FILL SS102 -/0.6SS3 3 SWAMP DEPOSITHEMIC PEAT, DARK BROWN TO BLACK (Pt)7 -/0.7SS24 SS -/0.415 -/0.4SS26 SS -/0.517 COLLAPSED GLACIAL SEDIMENT 15 1/2 SILTY CLAY, TRACE OF FINE TO COARSE SAND, SOFT (CL) -10.2SS78 21 END OF BORING Boring terminated at 21 feet. Bore hole filled with soil cuttings after retrieval of hollow stem auger. Cave-in Depth: 2 feet. Depth of Frost: NA 9/9/2008DATE:WATER TABLE MEASUREMENTSDATE: METHOD OF DRILLING:3%" H.S.A. Oto 19 1/2 ftNo measurable groundwater encountered during or at completion of boring.9/9/08 CREWCHIEF:J. BROOKS 'V f «GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG PROJECT TITLE; PROPOSED LOT 3 BLOCK 2 SCALP LAKE ACRES - RURAL VERGUS, MINNESOTA PROJ. NUMBER: 08-10213.100 BORING NUMBER: SB-4 SAMPLE DATA LABORATORY TESTSDESCRIPTION OF MATERIALDEPTH GEOLOGIC ORIGIN QuLL(feet)N NOWL TYPE W D surface elevation: 87.1 PL fa.TOPSOILTOPSOIL, ORGANIC, SILTY LEAN CLAY, BLACK (OL) FILL, SANDY LEAN CLAY, TRACE OF GRAVEL, BROWN 1/2 FA1FILL SS2 SS523 -/0.8HEMIC PEAT, DARK BROWN TO BLACK (Pt)SWAMP DEPOSIT SS24 -/0.4 SS10MA R L 3 5 -/0.4SANDY LEAN CLAY, LITTLE GRAVEL, GRAY, SOFT (CL) 11 1/2 CLAYEY GRAVEL, GRAY, MOIST, WITH CALCIUM CARBONATES, MEDIUM DENSE (GC)SS126 14 CLAYEY SAND, TRACE OF GRAVEL, DARK GRAY, MEDIUM DENSE (SC) MIXED ALLUVIUM 13 7 SS SS108 SS169 SS1410 31 END OF BORING Boring terminated at 31 feet. Bore hole filled with soil cuttings after retrieval of hollow stem auger. Cave-in Depth: 2 feet. Depth of Frost: NA DATE:WATER TABLE MEASUREMENTS DATE:9/9/2008 9/9/08 No measurable groundwater encountered during or at completion of boring.METHOD OF DRILLING:3%"H.S.A. 0 to 29 1/2 ftCREWCHIEF:J. BROOKS WcwmgwfTfctwwoLOQiES.ft4& I.6 V OTTER TAIL COUNTY Grade & Fill Permit* /S5V N-(^xtr \j C-, •\d0 . <A i<^ bnAjrtkP ^ Al<^ft.G.flRgT Wallace OWNER’S NAME: Address LiOCSltlOIl! Lake Nn.358sec. 7_Twp7^7 Range ^0 Twp. Name Aor 3 &IK ^ ScAt.i> Acgfs________________ ^T M Roy A°i7 fkAZ.tr<r /•Ha) i> (oS^Y 1 Issued_3r?Ll9.5l_, Expires ^~/ 19^7 rk Authorized P/^c^ Umh bxtr (^iu)x so^l j ^^0 X 6>0 A^teA ^ PLacc Aoi^^lcx ^Oyjis^ CCASS QI^ /W ^ 77/<^/0 iLUNOiSCo^ »So - /Jc/ CLo%<fA Fkc^ LAi>~€ ^ ^)q To /Sd" PLAcet XJ A -rThis card shall be placed in a conspicous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is tolje done, and shall be maintained there until completion of such work. NOTIFY DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEM NO ELEPHONEj^lS) 739-2271 WHEN AUTHORIZED WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Board of County Commissioners/CO Land and Resouf^Management Official V-75-^71. Earthmoving shall be done between 2. Entire area shaii be stabilized within 10 days of the completion of any earthmoving. 3. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that may occur. 4. No fill shall enter or be taken from the beds of a public water without a valid permit from the State of & ^ ^ A. m____— A .Ik A LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY FERGUS FALLS. MINN.t1\MKL-0871-030 File Opening Date.19. Individual File ( Name of Applicant: Subdivision File { )Subdivision Name.Special Use ( )Use Description 1 / 'h (^lonjuiA^ St hi iroii- La-iCe> MhJ^ * ^ SMt* Zip No. j / Phone No. ^ Address:I Last Nam*St. a No.7 1.7,7 4o f-fcfyirf B*c. Twp. Rang* Twp Na«n* MiddI*City Legal Descjipdog I fLp Cl*M(f. Laic* or flvar Nam*Lak* No. St'CA JrJhl. /1(AJU>■ik £jo6^ O BUILDING PERMITS VARIANCES ON BLJII DINfi PFRMITR Oat* Notifi*dPurpQ**Date (n«p*ct*<l Rwulta Hefing Pat*Pat*Appl. Data H**fing JudgamantNn. 5 i* 0 SEWAGE SYSTEM PERMITS VARIANCES ON SEWAGE SYSTEM PERMITSDataPufpoaaData InvactadNO.Rasulti Appl. Data Haaring Data Haaring Judgamaftt Data Nottfiad ; » I -1 0 SPECIAL USE PERMirS 1 Application Data Haaring Oat*Notica Mailad COMMENTS SECTION; «+RT 7-/0-Si mAccompanying Documents Filed in Cabinet No.. NOTE: O and 0 See enclosed Inspectors Copy of Permit Application. © See enclosed Special Use Permit Application.r«^s I97tss I^v ■■■f. •1viil J./ ij»:■ :i»W; Otter Tail County Planning Commission County i^uurt House Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 April 8, 1988 Donald Wallace R#4 Box 297 Frazee, MN 5654A Dear Mr. Wallace: This is to inform you that at the April 6, 1988 meeting of the Otter Tail County Planning Commission a motion was passed to approve your conditional use application with the following provisions: 1. There be a maximum of 1 1/2' of fill placed on Lot 3. 2. There be a maximum of 4' of fill placed on Lot 2. 4. The drainage ditch must be protected. 5. within 100' of the lake, except if there are any divots. 6. fill that is taken from outside of this area. Must slope away from the lake with the fill, on both lots. No fill is to be placed Must use clean 3. The Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners will consider this application on April 14, 1988 at 1:30 P.M. Sincerely, Marsha Bowman Acting Secretary OTCPC ■ Scale: Each grid equals feet/inches GP'D PLOT PLAN SKETCHING FORM V ^ / / I 19 ■Dated: Signature Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake and sideyard for each budding currently on lot and any proposed structures. r V\ \“ \ \ — v-«. -I«o' 5:^ ^ 'II ^ 7 I f ^ fe. 111" O tr.>: : 1»'T;rrj#P!va *7?r77 V - —“ 5'64 ;7o'r-5 tI0 :/£;V: r. ^ i; ^ T*> ^ ?- tA. f' j--t;I j i o■ i ! • ■'i o 4~/■; :/I tII ! 'I ^ ? §-c i- % 1 ^ ■• I // >. , /// // 2|f«R7(C7^MKL-0871-029 9^ 673928 - APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Shoreland Management Ordinance Otter Tail County Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 Lake '~1 Twp. /3 ^ Range Ho •DOApplication Fee $Rec. No.Date: 7^ bqjxH— Twp. NameLegal description of land: p Lake ClassLake Name SdtF\^ L^k'e. Ac^s fU'a'yTE Fire No.Legal Description: Parcel Number: ^>V/ ( L&x)<L.{ as oJXo-ClLcL dAtuX}i-rK -PtW ljo'iU ij € (-W Pei(jU^- -PiWPdl, ^ liSL^J <.Aa^o i^uL. 'Hric.^ o h ak )a-(' ZProject Description: LaHL «-CL^^d. > '->A>vUL r-c_CLc^\-~ l\e 'u^4~ a"f M-Lt. lauJf'sA L.a~h^ •4o h ''“fT\TL.^ '/ -7TU4,ow ^OY ;6o' J-T In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPL\C\ANT SHALL BE PRE^NT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. Addr^: !!S P/unierv ^ i!)rTi^r., f/Li.l',ei //In \,hJ yf. ^ e rzy c/ gfO 2 9 7 n'd.i-'Vty - - Sir/SiPS'Owner __—RomePh. p-V?- OJ'i.Z-^-7 Bus. Ph. ^/.PApplicant Signature: tooDate of hearing:Time:M Conditional Requirements: App/ioue youA conditional u&c application uiith the. ^ottouiing pnoviiions: I. Theae be a maximum oi 7 7/2' 0($ ^ill placed on Lot 3. 2. Theae be a maximum 0(5 4' 0|J iiU placed on Lot 2. 3. MuaT itope away ^Kom the lake with the iiU, on both loti. 4. The chain- age ditch muit be protected. 5. Wo (^ill ii to be placed within 100' o^ the lake, except ij ■thcfte-aia any ctwota. (>. Ilttaf me ggpon jift that ii taken jiio, ^ This application is hereby recommended for approval by the Otter Tail County Planning Advisory Commi^ssion. TP OKca ef County ntcorrtr County of Otter Tail I iiM*r Ctitly tm mt mtim mnv ™« «M « ■ k. * '''—ApfiraiAmi tty fh“ RnarH of County Commissioners of Otter Tail County this m /! f/I -fhChsirman ■it)13.day ofs:.p . u . and <HS euy MmOmei «2L'-----670986 ■■ g' ^CMMy Speeial kJse Pefnft<°Hlued in accordance with compliance with existing Conditional Requiremerrts and Special Regulations and ho ,.9^, Minnesota Commissioner of Natural Resources notified this day of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.y /tttf, \Ap// I . Lee, Shoreland Adifiinhtnt6r ^ Oner TeU County, Minnesota MKL-0871<01-01 220707 (g) ,.cT. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 i NOTICE OF HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:Vonatd WoLlaco. ' Box 297 pAazee, MW 56544 ICim Tu/me/L 1 1 3 VlOYliZQjl St. VztAott La.kz^, MN 56501 and has made application to the Otter Tail County Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit as per requirements of the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance. The Otter Tail County kphJJi 6,SSPlanning Commission will assemble for this hearing on 19. CommA^AtonpA.' A Roorrt^ CnuAt. Hoii^z^Fersus Falls, Minnesota.00-P. M. PlaceTime, This notice is to advise you that you may attend the above hearing and express your views on the Conditional Use requested.PlzdAZ luz Lm En{^oA.cmzyyt Ent/Loncz. The property concerned in the application is legally described as: Lake No.- 56- 55% Sec.HoboAtTwp. Name.Twp. 137 Range_4A— Class__^ 1_ Saatp Lakz MomLake Name:^Fire No. J. lot i & Lot 3,- Block 1 0^ .Scalp Lake Acaca 7- THE CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED IS: f Uould like to {^lll and level ao both lots oAe the Aome and a home can be put In' on Lot 1 oa peA attached dAowlng; Maximum height ol {^lll muld be 4’ In the loMZAt ApotA,■ lotA to be {filled and leveled to match-7O' x 160' o^ Lot 3 otAeady {filled and landAcaped. .•'iVAawlng’available ^oA viewing at Land 6 ReAouAce Management Office, CouAt HouAe, feAguA FoIIai, MW) . MoACh 16, 19SSDated. Otter Tail County Planning Commission Chm. MKL -0871-011 . 0 K By:.f 221910l(^ VICTOR UINOeCN 4 CO.. PRINTERS. PCRQU3 FALLS.'UINN. lAlJL^ 'UUUi'^JUI’h>0Conditional Use Permit CUP^ '4' Vy/gltiftL'C-___________ in Plokm^ cSt, j\t.hvd LAke^i^ ^AA/\I LiOCS-tlOn! lake Hn^ Sec ^ Tw[i/3^ Range ^ Twp Name I'loiw.i' "f _________ A 'i-'U3f3,Sl<^(A3L 0-P 35Sp ZtAje/D <> OWNER’S NAME: of"ly Address //^!/f t-fl -'I-J;. (v ^ / 'I Issued 3 19 Ji_, Expires ^P> 1912 Work Authorized ^ .Qjjl-(qoa({ ______________Af)pUC«>-im^_________________ BY: NOTE: This card shall be placed in a conspicous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is to be done, and shall be maintained there until completion of such work. NOTIFY DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEM T, TELEPHONE (218) 739-2271 WHEN AUTHORIZED WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Board of County Commissioners■7 ADMINISTRATOR, Land and Resource Management jw ;ghM 15-1. Earthmoving shall be done between 2. Entire area shall be stabilized within 10 days of the completion of any earthmoving. 3. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that may occur. 4. No fill shall enter or be taken from the beds of a public water without a valid permit from the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 5. If the terms of this permit ere violated the entire permit may be revoked and the owner may be subject & i > '7/ ■ • Motion was Biade by Sydney Nelson, seconded by Asnly Leitch and naani- Dously carried, to approve a prellalnary plat of Welter's Wilderness, to be located in Section 27 - 137 41. Upon saotion Bade by Sydney Nelson, seconded by Jdm Smwberg and uaanicamly carried, the plat of "Heaven's View" located in Section 22 - 137 - 40 was approved, subject to road approval. Upon notion Bade by Sydney Nelson, seconded by John Snowberg and carried, the following special use peraits were approved, subject to conditional requiresents: Leonard Hillstrom Dora Township Leaf Mountain Township Dora Township Hobart Township Construct road to serve subdivision Ben Stich Construct 450' of road Dorothy Bylander Expand existing resort Raymond C. Olson Cut and fill Richard C. Helander Eagle Lake Township Fill low land Upon motion aade by Hub Nordgron, seconded by Andy Leitch and unani- Bously carried, the following applications for sewage disposal installers licisnse wore approved, subject to bond: ^!oench Plbg. Q Htg.Duane Moench Uadona, Minnesota Ellis Engebrotson Engobretson Construction Pelican Rapids, Minnesota Pelican Rapids, MinnesotaCharles Eggo Egge Construction Marvin J. Wegseheid Bluffton Hardware Bluffton, Minnesota Harold Engobretson Engobretson Plbg. 5 Htg.Pelican Rapids, Minnesota Pelican Rapids, MinnesotaTncaon Strand Coast-to-Coast Wilbur Torgrirason Ashby, Minnesota Brandon, MinnesotaDavid Wagner Albert Brctr •;-dware Perhan, Minnesota Otter Tail County Planning Advisory Commission May 17, 1978County Court House Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 Passed;A motion by Portmann, second by Beck to approve the special use application of Ben Stich, dated April 21, 1978 on Spitzer Lake, No. 56-160, NE, Sec. 19 of Leaf Mountain Twp. for approximately 300 feet of private road to serve Lot 1 with minimum of 40 foot holding area before entry on CSAR No. 38. Voting; All members in favor. Passed;A motion by Lee, second by Davis to approve the special use application of Dorothy Bylander, dated April 24, 1978 on Sybil Lake, No. 56-387, RD, Sec. 1 of Dora Twp. Voting; All members in favor. Passed;A motion by Portmann, second by Jacobson to approve the special use- application of Raymond C. Olson, dated April 25, 1978 on Scalp Lake, No. 56-358, RD, Sec. 7 of Hobart Twp. on lots 3, 4 and 6 of Scalp Lake Acres for same type of cutting and filling as on Myer's lot - only to remove top of ice ridge and fill behind ice ridge and cut area ta be sodded along lake - 8 foot strip of sod.-•* •: — Voting; All members in favor. A motion by Portmann, second by Ryan to approve the special use application" of Raymond C. Olson, dated April 25, 1978 on Scalp Lake, No. 56-358, RD, Sec. 7 of Hobart Twp. within 6 inches of top of ice ridge and open ditch be provided along lot line for natural drainage to lake. All members,in favor. ..Passed; Voting; Passed;A motion by Estes, second by Jacobson to approve the preliminary plat plans of Welter's Wilderness in Sec. 27 of Candor Twp. as presented. Developer is Tom Welter, Verges, MN 56587. Voting; All members in favor.... Passed;A motion by Portmann, second by Davis to adjourn the meeting at 10;30 P.M. and to set Wednesday, June 7, 1978 as the date for the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Voting; All members in favor. Respectfully submitted. Malcolm K. Lee Acting Secretary, OTCPAC OTTER TAIL COUWl Y SpecicJ Use Permit SUP No. OWNER'S NAME:^^M C,. 0 Address_______ Location: 0 AJD Lake No3tS^6C.Twp.^^ST Range H^Twp. Name VIO mm T Issuedmi»i=s_33l9its_, Expires. Work Authorizect A C-U*^ ^ A. NC/rii; 'I'liis curd shall he placed in a conspicuous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is w he done, and shall he maintained there until completion of such work. Notify Department of Land and Resource ■Management. Telephone (218) 739-2271 when authorized work has been completed. BY: OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Board of County Commissioners .. .I ADMINISTRATOR, Land and Resource Management i 1. Entire area shall be stabilized within 10 days of the completion of the moving project. 2. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that may occur. 3. No fill shall enter or be taken from the beds of a public water without a valid permit from the State of Minnesota Depart­ ment of Natural Resources. 4. If the terms of this permit are violated the entire permit may be revoked and the owner may be subject to legal prosecu- ♦ i/^n * %------APPLICA T/ON FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT------- Shoreland Management Ordinance Otter Tail County Fergus Falls, Minnesota 56537 WhiM - Office Ysilow — Applicant n-3-T~PermitApplication Fee $19 7 ^Date. Nq^ ^ Sec. 7 Twp.^_2-2. Range Two. Name Pc ^ Lt>t^ Legal description of land; Lake il gf^.Lake Name Eoi^s 3/V**» D % S'c.^ f _ Lake Class Sketch and supporting data submitted J d »/*>■•. /Or/»» .C»-»~ nrw >■ ts <■»«. I>-J PROPOSED USE OF LAND: ht f k 3 i- K • •»> « j>F»-o ^ * j2.~h /__________ y^c ki k . FTUi\jA-. Home PhonePhone. PfApplicant.Address ^ fc yg~a- Applicant Signature z P 'DQ ^ M5 ~ I *t____19 V IDate of Hearing Time. CONDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:(X^SiOLp^pAtsvf-4- (UJZtuvy-, MVU- ~ ^ ^ jxoJX)Uoi MxJ^ ~ f ■foo't CXrr\^^ This application is hereby recommended for approval by the Otter T^l Couruty Platinij (v^ry^ommissionj, y 6?.-jrd Myj.s^ZiLApproved by the Board of County Commissioners of Otter Tail County this..day of. Chairman Special Use Permit issued in accordance with compliance with existing Conditional Requirements and Special Regulations and '^?d this c3Minnesota Commissioner of Natural Resourceb noti^(1 w of /,5~3!SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. MKL-0871-010 Ottaro*** County. Minneaota171988® «wr»i uHWf (■ m.. envTia*. riaeui r^u. wra V .. C... il tCOPY ; •; i ; I : & ^ T Jc YY‘/i-a otter Tail County, Planning Commission September 21,2011, Page 2 Brian L. Fetzer-Approved With Conditions: A Conditional Use Permit (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): This is an After-The-Fact Request. Added 10 yards of sand to beach. Added 3 yards of rip rap rock to build retaining wall (356 sq. ft.). Added 192 sq. ft. of patio pavers to build patio. Added 118 sq. ft. of sod to prevent erosion from rain runoff. Added 146 sq. ft. of mulch and plants to edge of patio. (All dimensions are located on scale drawing on back of “Application for Grade & Fill Permit Application, available on file at Land & Resource Office). The project is located in Pt of GL 1 (1.63 Ac), Section 29 of Scambler Township: Pete Lake (56-941), NE. Brian Fetzer represented the Application. Randy Arntson, previous owner, agreed with the Applicant that cattle did create problems with the shoreline. Motion: A motion by Maske, second by Erickson to approve as presented, provided the sand in the beach area is revegetated, the stabilization plan for the revegetation must be approved by Land & Resource, and temporary erosion control measures must be implemented no later than November 1, 2011. Voting: All members in favor. Jerry & Barbara Thurman - Tabled To October 12, 2011: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Appiicant on the Application): Excavate soil to construct a non-natural walk-out basement. Walkout cut - 48’ L x 14’ out x 6’ D = 149.3 c.y. Slope sides 80 c.y. 14’ L x 26’ W x 6’ D. Spoils from excavation to be used in low area and to backfill around dwelling: any remainder will be hauled offsite. The project is located in Pt GL 5 & 6 (3 Ac), Section 8 of Dora Township: East Spirit Lake (56-501), RD. Scott Stenger (S & S Construction) represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Erickson, second by Maske to table (at the Applicant’s request), to October 12, 2011 to allow the Applicant time to clarify the request and provide additional detail: 1. A scale drawing identifying the proposed profiles. 2. A scale drawing verifying the proposed cuts & slopes. 3. A proposed drainage plan. 4. Stake (and identify) proposed cuts onsite. Information must be received by Land & Resource no later than September 23, 2011. Voting: All members in favor. Matt & Bridget Cullen - Approved As Presented: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Proposing the excavation of unstable soil material on-site and the construction of a suitable building pad for a single family dwelling unit and a detached garage. House: maximum area of cut 96’ x 104’, maximum depth 13’, area will be filled with a granular fill and compacted at max depth 7’. Garage: maximum area of cut 50’ x 36’ maximum depth 4’, backfill 6”*^' . Install/construct two retaining walls to contain backfill and to maintain existing grade as much as possible, one wall on north side of proposed dwelling, one wall on south side of proposed garage. Will stockpile usable soil on site approx. 1600 cu.yds, will establish and maintain stormwater run off buffers, all unusable soil will be removed from site. Remove topsoil and replace with hardsurface driveway to garage. Request to have the project completed by 11-1-11. The project is located on Lot 3 BIk 2 Scalp Lake Acres, Section 7, Hobart Township: Scalp Lake (56-358), RD. Terry Becker (Becker Construction) and Austin Becker (Becker Construction) represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Boyer, second by Maske to approve as presented. Voting: All members in favor. OTC Board of Commissioners’ Minutes September 27, 2011 Page 6 Required EAW- “Homestead on OttertaiT/Grea & Beth Swanbera: Motion by Johnson, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to table the Conditional Use Permit request to allow completion of the required Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) as recommended by the Planning Commission. The project is located in Pt of SE% NE% & Lot 1 & 2 ex tr. Doc# 996380, Section 29, Otter Tail Township; Otter Tail Lake (56-242), RD. Ditch Viewer Appointments Motion by Huebsch, second by Johnson, and unanimously carried to approve Kevin Brennan and George Palmer as Otter Tail County Ditch Viewers and place them on the current Ditch Viewer list. Employer Contribution Discussion took place regarding the non-union employer contribution. Motion by Rogness, second by Johnson, and unanimously carried to table the employer contribution discussion until next week when the County Administrator is present and to schedule a Closed Session for Labor Negotiation Strategies. County Drainage System #39 Discussion took place regarding County Drainage System #39. Commissioners requested that the Highway Engineer meet with other interested Department Heads, assess the Ditch as it relates to drainage and solutions, and return to the Board with a recommendation(s). Discussion aiso took place regarding staffing in regards to various water flow/drainage issues. Commissioners requested that this item be placed on the County Board agenda next week for an administrative discussion. RESOLUTION WAIVING THE THIRTY-DAY NOTIFICATION PERIOD PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 469.175 SUBDIVISION 2 Otter Tall County Resolution No. 2011 - 56 Commissioner Huebsch introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, which motion was seconded by Commissioner Froemming and unanimously carried. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fergus Falls (the “City”) will be conducting a public hearing on Monday, October 3, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. to consider the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4-9 (the “TIF District”); and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175 Subd. 2 requires that the County Board be provided notice of the establishment of the TIF District, a copy of the proposed tax increment financing plan (“TIF Plan”) and the estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed establishment of the TIF District at least thirty days before the public hearing required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 2; and WHEREAS, the Countyx Board of Commissioners for Otter Tail County has received a copy of the proposed TIF Plan, including estimates of the fiscal and economic implications of the TIF District to be established by the City; and WHEREAS, the City has requested a waiver of the County Board’s thirty-day comment period provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175 Subd. 2: and WHEREAS, the County Board desires to waive the thirty-day notification requirement in order to expedite the City’s establishment of the TIF District; and WHEREAS, the County Board has reviewed the TIF Plan and the fiscal impacts of the TIF District; OTC Board of Commissioners’ Minutes September 27, 2011 Page 5 Painting Project - Parkers Prairie Highway Garage Motion by Johnson, second by Huebsch, and carried with Froemming abstaining, to award the Exterior Painting Project for Otter Tail County Garage #3 to Larson Painting of Parkers Prairie, MN at the lowest, responsible price of $2,150.00. Soil Boring Projects Motion by Rogness, second by Froemming, and unanimously carried to authorize the Highway Engineer’s signature to execute an agreement (Proposal FA-11-06216) between the County of Otter Tail and Braun Intertec for soil boring work for the CSAH 50 Overlay project at an estimated cost of $4,366.00. Motion by Rogness, second by Froemming, and unanimously carried to authorize the Highway Engineer’s signature to execute an agreement (Proposal FA-11-06288) between the County of Otter Tail and Braun Intertec for soil boring work for the CSAH 95 Overlay project between TH 29 & CSAH 42 at an estimated cost of $1,869.00. The County Board also discussed turning this portion of CSAH 95 back to the City of Parkers Prairie as it is within the city limits. Commissioners indicated that there are other similar situations throughout the County and requested that the Highway Engineer bring this as a discussion point to the Highway Committee. Recess & Reconvene At 11:03 a.m.. Chairman Lindquist declared the meeting of the Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners recessed for a short break. The Board of Commissioners’ meeting was reconvened at 11 ;09 a.m. Planning Commission Recommendations Conditional Use Permit - Scambler Township: Motion by Johnson, second by Froemming, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit for a road project with a condition as recommended by the Planning Commission. The project starts at the Jet of CSAH 9 & 490“^ St going east 2100’, Section 14, Scambler Township: Tamarac Lake (56-931), RD. Conditional Use Permit - Cody L. Lvden etal % Kenneth & Cindy Lvden: Motion by Rogness, second by Huebsch, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit for topographical work to prepare a building pad for a pole building as presented and recommended by the Planning Commission. The project is located in GLS 5, 6 ex trs & 7, SW>4 NE% (77.57 AC), Section 31 of Dunn Township; Lake Lizzie (56-760), RD. Conditional Use Permit - Brian L. Fetzer: Motion by Johnson, second by Froemming, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit for an after-the-fact request to build a retaining wall and place patio pavers and sod with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. The sand in the beach area must be re-vegetated and the stabilization plan for the re-vegetation must be approved by the Land & Resource Office with temporary erosion control measures implemented no later than November 1, 2011. The project is located in Pt of GL 1 (1.63 Ac), Section 29 of Scambler Township: Pete Lake (56-941), NE. Conditional Use Permit - Matt & Bridget Cullen: Motion by Huebsch, second by Johnson, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a building pad for a single family home and garage as presented and recommended by the Planning Commission. The project is located on Lot 3 BIk 2 Scalp Lake Acres, Section 7, Hobart Township; Scalp Lake (56-358), RD. -.i - . # , *•GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG PROPOSED LOT 3 BLOCK 2 SCALP LAKE ACRES - RURAL VERGUS, MINNESOTA 08-10213.100PROJECT TITLE: PROJ NUMBER:BORING NUMBER: SB-5 LABORATORY TESTSSAMPLE DATADESCRIPTION OF MATERIALDEPTH (feet)GEOLOGIC ORIGIN LL QuNOTYPEWDWLNPL86.3surface elevation;27 SS1240 SS2713 46 END OF BORING Boring terminated at 46 feet. Bore hole filled with soil cuttihgs after retrieval of hollow stem auger. Cave-ih Depth: 3 feet. Depth of Frost: NA 5 DATE:9/9/2008WATER TABLE MEASUREMENTS DATE: METHOD OF DRILLING:3%"H.S.A. 0 to 44 1/2 ftMeasurable groundwater encountered at 24 feet at completion of boring.9/9/08 J. BROOKSCREWCHIEF: ■[/ GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG PROPOSED LOT 3 BLOCK 2 SCALP LAKE ACRES - RURAL VERGUS, MINNESOTA 08-10213.100PROJECT TITLE: PROJ. NUMBER:BORING NUMBER: SB-5 LABORATORY TESTSSAMPLE DATADESCRIPTION OF MATERIALDEPTH (feet)GEOLOGIC ORIGIN QuLL NO TYPE W ,DWLN PL Pq.surface elevation; 66.3 TOPSOILTOPSOIL, ORGANIC, SILTY LEAN CLAY, BLACK (OL) FILL, SANDY LEAN CLAY, TRACE OF GRAVEL, BROWN FA11/2 FILL SS -/2.252 SS73 SWAMP DEPOSIT6HEMIC PEAT, BLACK (Pt) SS -/ 1.024 SS -/0.915 SS -/0.761 -/0.2SS71 19 1/2 PEAT, LIGHT BROWN TO BROWN (Pt)SS -/0.318 24 CLAYEY FINE TO COARSE SAND, TRACE OF GRAVEL, GRAY, LOOSE (SC) MIXED ALLUVIUM SS59 27 SILTY FINE TO COARSE SAND TRACE OF GRAVEL, GRAY, LOOSE (SP-SM) SS710 SS1511 Boring continued on next page FWOHr»fcHwTtX»MIOLOQIES.<NC. /{elk Se>Jiei #Vi OTTER TAIL COUNTY Grade & Fill Permit * llOl WrtUftCCOWNER’S NAME: F^/i26V. /1^/J 565vy____________ LiOCSttlOni Lake Nn.3S8 Sec. 7__Twp737 Range VO Twp. Name /^o6A^r ■_____/or 3 3. %1/qLfi La>U' Auers ___________ boxAddress IssuedTQ^/3_19^7 , Expires // ^ 19">7 Work Authorized auoaj& £hG(r% nf hixofu/a^ iAJtTH !^LacIC bin (J>0 \jit wftiO Alo^T oR. CoUt"^ UilT/V hIMOkCH tuAMbbtATtZy. /^4L BiG- s/um€- "^axu^u/Ayf. IUfc'75 i/J V/^i^h tiiuSTS <vl 1 NOTE; This card shall be placed in a conspicous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is to be done, and shall be maintained there until completion of such work. NOTIFY DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEI^ENJ, TELEPHpNE (218) 739-2271 WHEN AUTHORIZED WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Board of County Commissioners Land and Res0mce Management Official 10-/3 -‘7 71. Earthmoving shall be done between 2. Entire area shall be stabilized within 10 days of the completion of any earthmoving. 3. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that may occur. 4. No fill shall enter or be taken from the beds of a oublic water without a valid oermit from the State of & ■ 'f' OTTER TAIL COUNTY doGrade & Fill Permit? I j^){\LLf\C£ ____________ &ax fkA2^~^'. __________ LoCSltlOIK Lake Nn.^^8 Srr. 7 TwpV 37 RangeTwp. Name /t^ ._______4or 3 BilK, <3. ^cjRki^ L/\^e Ac/^6-^_________ OWNER’S NAME: Address Issued-ZiiA^ 19H_, Expires^-/ 19_52_ ^^ork Ant.liori7:iRd PUa /lu i/J H^'xioa' Aia hiSMs*jT To ~\Zj^ ^ 7U>P AffiUt/rtO ? ALS^o 6, LSt\\£. S7£zP ALoaJC Ko7fl SCitS oF /x4A Small hi(/a.'z^ ^A^h. H/luST Sob oH rITH ^rHAoJ h^uLCff TMiMk^kT-Aia^. !lo yJs^ BLacK I^Ur 7&ri4i^ NOTE: This card shall be placed in a conspicous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is to be done, and^allmaintained there until completion of such work. NOTIFY DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND RESOURCE MAN^A<3|ENjEN5>pr^EPHQNE (2J^$J73^9-2^^^ AUTHORIZED WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Board of County Commissioners • Land and Resi Management Official &1. Earthmoving shall be done between 2. Entire area shall be stabilized within 10 days of the completion of any earthmoving. 3. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that rnay occur. 4. No fill shall enter or be taken from the beds of a public water without a valid permit from the State of i;.. Grade & Fill Permit #2044 C)\aJauuac6*^PROPERTY OWNER J^OT 3 /4c/tdS LAKE 1^8 SEC. 'I TWP. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OTWP. NAME /(tP 6 XV/3 C'f' LcT COxT/-/ (g ^LacK ^tUT /9vJ)WORK AUTHORIZED felAot 4- (aHfc7\*l Tcj? A^Pg. K/oo M.ef\ cP Tcj9 NOTE: This card shall be placed in a conspicuous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is to be done, & shall be maintained there until completion of such work. NOTIFY LAND & RESOURCE MAN­ AGEMENT. 218-739-2271 WHEN AUTHORIZED WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 1. EARTHMOVING SHALL BE DONE BETWEEN V-/5-99 & 2. Entire area shall be stabilized within 10 days of completion of any earthmoving. 3. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that may occur. 4. No fill shall enter or be taken from the beds of public water without a valid permit from the MN Department of Natural Resources. 5. If the terms of this permit are violated, the entire perrnit may be revoked and the owner may be subject to legal prosecution. 'T'( ( -vf ^ - V\v^ ^xree^ - A T-f^l f,i\H i V <r ^ \ iui ^.. •• GRID PLOT PUNfeet SKETCHING FORWScale:____^rid(s) equals feet, or Jnch(es) equals _ . . i j -i 4- Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, l^, sldeyard and sephc le^ hiddtaia I field for each building currently on tot and any grossed structures, .... ^ ------ htr.f: :: rbtr:r’ 4-1 4.:k r '— Dated: : 3-^^ i-..,. S4»Mluni__ :!-!i ;lU :rfu. r 'S^ ^ j!,!h 1-'-* t-Hj-i-f——}4"[ I—I—f-4-^ / S'h‘''p a ^iT ;.4 !L‘ - |i-i W'i-: t;tL-4 j., L ,T-t- V -r- \r^^6pOt..ff~:f-r ao/'a;:I iit i. ■ ..............................................t -r-iMv rf> t4 4~ i‘1 ^';"'::-i44±4te4:4 :■/;£>>: /Til»: .Lrtite.rludj:; tr - a a£;--r±ffi3iit±t3 i-lt-^:xj 4 f--;::ru• ■* » - - ♦ -4- -•-—4—t- • «• - ■ »--t- -•►|q.1 Li-........f I ...li___LCf-4]-4t rf-I ii 4-•I L-Or fl4!-- i....i.-1-ri:|:i trtt -•!- • ■L-1 I 4-4i-4 i--■; L fiti mm I EL -~i-."T n-mm.I ■ i: j \( }>^.; 1 r^4 iiQ A~^<* ■ ■'■■■• •'i 4 441. .^-4-ip-}\t----- 1 i. ~.L 4..f :111 m ‘'ij '•■ '• -t-l ■. 4—j—1| 4 :^.lzLi:i rtTi t-^r^j -t ‘I >_v'-'-Fi-ff! Fj Ji - r.. I i -i-r!iLtLXri ptLi4;Li i.i-UXJ :-r-?-Ll't |+f| ^ t'4':--------1 3 -r41I EFP 4I |dx:£ti -f-4-4-^i mtidFI I3-!“T tiI-I ■—1--4------1 h i IhIf!-ii i-4tr4- 1-1-’ f-t .4-4-+-r-'4444-4434: El# -i -i._. ttF t *nii-J4om •i - i_L - i—-4_|-|_|_ #34---—I XI!IitL4- -•-t F -4rt ^Lr--r --r-i1 I MKL—aaTi—o» t bmttr-ixti - r -——■»-■ ixiitiLiiill-j-i ii * GRID PLOT PLANfeet SKETCHING FORMScale:.grid(s) equals.feet, or jnch(es) equals V1—I ‘iif H L!:::4-1 • f ) , 19 •^ 7 i , : [T1 I Signature, Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake,'sideyard and septc tankarld dtain^. i-I I field foi\ each building currently on lot and any proposed structures. • ‘ r;.: ^ ^ ; :h:U:; : : ^ ;.i I '__ -- - ___ 'OX t I ; .it I i J-.-. I r J ; ; -tT"f-r-:r‘‘i -^iiT t : I I I I i I I !-!!1i-:!-* f-‘ i t i ■'J i f-hI- i i■ t go1 . i tiih-H I K 56t70s,-A 7; -f - *-*^"^ *-*-Lirzif] ~r J!J T1‘ H !-H ri -r /'S. 4_-r-.--L4 ! i i , I n -M (-i?Hi.1! I ./ii tit .'!i I 1i. :I m: I i 1 1 i I ’ /r I I..4..M!(1 I!i 1 i 1i\¥I «'l ;I 4-4-^i_1-T 1 : ;j ihli: < i —j—-j— 1.t:I Jj i tfIt - I I I :t1- "T i ti- t-llL!i. SIP'Ij, — 4mht4*miMfi-fi t 5rl/(I,'d'i..i’.-t!I * ^Ku7-tei .1 ofik-- of •/T 4:4||itii-tit wA r::a0 m— W w4 s 3-ry. AT i. V-MKL—.OBTI—102»IS ID. <h GRID PLOT PLANfeet SKETCHING FORMJnch(es) equalsfeet, or.grid(s) equalsScale: 3 - ^ ?19 ^Dated:Signature Please sketch your lot indicating setbacks from road right-of-way, lake, sideyard and septic tank and drain field for each building currentiy on lot and any proposed structures. /fr: if "I i 1. ■r-\0 AitiiVt - $6 009^4^k ^ hy<rs.-.1__ TT'? ‘i i"!I, /iA/4 i p/J A i433AjO 4^ 0;T -1_I 1 ..L.1I I 4- Tl7 'il- 1 I i +1- 1 ,L LOP Af .. -J» -L- ,pj r I*r 1^4? "7i4IIsI]LsI-I i'-4-4 -----U 4 joo L iL..I .j I lli r J ^-4-^ 6 ^1/-^ “ -i (yj •gcT-I!j/i 4r't i(7 AM’'' I.f :4(95 ?: 1L_■1-hI ;t1iii -4-j5_[_I >;1!-1 1IIi:.1-44 4.f :T t fj.I;•4—iTi:IJ!r JI4- i 4,0^i 4 T 6^’+ ■pi I 1 I! I i1 ] +rI GoT7"4,u=4TIT fI.1L t441:I i 1\Ii■1»ICL..r-' 281,949 • Victor Lundeen Co.. Primers • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-800-346-4870MKL —0871 —029 J if tUriTCce(-^'e■ ^ ^ ff~o ( c s o 1) 7"a J/^SS ^ / C'/-' I c' ^ cL^s5> f^^aJ V- /Q-A^woej €» r ji AA t:./isi f i fj- C^/\ lLcK •^'/^ A.1 's 7^ -(\t i If/v 6uJfKrec^. -CftJ APPLICATION FOR GRADE & FILL PERMIT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-998-8095 www.co.otter-tail.mn.us Permit No.PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL INFORMATION LAKE/RIVER CLASS SECTION RANGELAKE/RIVER NAME TWP. NO.TWP NAMELAKE/RIVER # i~}chcrt7 Ho01 PROPERTY (E-911) ADDRESSPARCEL NUMBER(S) '10 Oocfi<^(Qt{ Tlcjoc) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Mailing AddressLast Name First Initial DAYTIME Phone No.^Jo'\ ^rjJreProperty Owner Wtfst fwto ^0 SieoySi \/0es Po. Bey ?95-________ Pctkc^ szs’?a Contractor Name /~c\kej ^Lie. # Date Stamp received OCT 2 1 201.3 L/\ND & RESOURCE NOTES: 1. The lotlines and project area(s) must be staked. 2. If project disturbs more than 1 acre of land you are required to obtain a General Storm Water Permit from the MPCA. L&R Initial PROJECT REQUEST (You may use the grid on back for required scale drawing): DESCRIBE YOUR PROJECT(S): (Z/> vK j-U. 5L}rJjy<., i 11 Cl & Srr^ he^.L, 6/<nL^ ,'a Ce/\ltr- oP cl/Cc,^ ^Tol>riy i-7\ki (rJ'jc/c Ad " Oef£>. V \~)< f.Vi -wxV'-’lO'-3l- \:3 V*) O \u-'T'; ^ V-'■'N V Pp IT ' O 3 J - ,/ir>.- DETAILED INFORMATION: AREA TO BE CUT/EXCAVATED;<^?jT Ft. X /O Ft. X (Yds^Ft. 27 Length Width Ave. Depth Yds^WALK-OUT BASEMENT PROJECTS: (Outside of the building foundation) Ft. X Ft. X Ft. - 27 = Length Width Ave. Depth Yds^AREA TO BE FILLED/LEVELED;Ft. X Ft. X Ft. - 27 = Length Width Ave. Depth Yds^TOTAL EARTHMOVING REQUESTED = BACKFILL AT FOUNDATION;Ft.Ft. Max. Depth Distance From Foundation CULVERT:If Yes, must indicate size and location on drawing. Yes No IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:% IF (ROPERTY OWNER/AGENT FOR OWNER DATESIGNATl RECEIPT NUMBER RKne^n'M i );•;!1Ii:I;The scale drawing must be a signied drawing which inciudes and identifies a graphic scaiei(feet); ali existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, i drainfie'ids, iotiines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands,; topographic features (i.e. biuffs)! and onsite impervious surface calcuiations.-j- Scale 1 i : i ; I - I 1 I !; !Ui-S'4.‘/so ' l(tOQ X. I !: t T■'r : \ 1 ! I i j 1-1 LS 1 I ;I i \)'1 ; i J:! f 345,195 • Victor Lundeen Co., Pfinters • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-800-346-4870BK — 0209 f & FILE MEMO & PARCEL # 3 ^ 9'^ CD^-n^ 0^)0 (^AKE^PR RIVER NAME & NO. SCAi-P ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Date L&R Official ^ ^^LLErJ /?£', (5n»44/f^<3 ^ \yiojcD "YW//! /^5 TW.^ IfiT f ? STcu^ceU>cf>T7afJ (^OiSTU/hSCO S^>nJ\ Action / Comments. 0€ltcJ(-J(S W Lo,' /Z? /^/ af^ 7?/t » ^£3. u-B ^ s/!.,v-G.-w;w Date L&R Official Action/Comments. Date L&R Official Action/Comments. L8lR OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R Official.Date Action/Comments. L&R Official.Date Action/Comments. ^Marsha Bowman Rita Tomlinson <rita.tandsons@tekstar.com> Wednesday, September 05, 2012 11:46 AM Marsha Bowman Tomlinson & Sons Request for Permit Reinstatement winmail.dat From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hello Marsha, I have attached a copy requesting the reinstatement of Permit #6652. Please pass this along to Bill for his review. I will also drop the original copy in the mail. Thank you for your assistance. Best regards, Rita Tomlinson 2^^( T' c Rita Tomlinson P.O. Box 1763 Detroit Lakes, MN 56502 P: 218-847-3092 F: 218-847-5143 tandsons(Stekstar.com www.tomlinsonanclsonsinc.com Uf ITH- 0^^ 'A 12 rJSatJ ^ X SsA4ic IP TtMUNSON « SONS ♦ A * * THB ^h4iJ<Sc //-y rfir. ^ DAh)A S'^4icCLiLC i^\Ta PlAJ Tv TfiZu ■ T ie\.X 9 rX X C w7j „ara;\u vvl'X 1 \ f September 5, 2012 received SEP 0 6 2012 land & RESOURCE Otter Tail County Government Services Center 540 West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Attn; Marsha Re: Matt & Bridget Cullen Residential Construction Project Hobart Township - Lot 3 Block 2 Plat 01400 Scalp Lake Acres This letter is to request a reinstatement of permit #6652, which expired on 11/01/11. Our desire is to start this project September 2012 and complete it by June 1, 2013. Please communicate your decision to our general contractor: Tomlinson & Sons Inc PO Box 1763 Detroit Lakes, MN 56502 218-847-3095 tandsons@arvig.net Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Regards, Bridget Cullen . M Department of LAMD AJMD1RES0OROE MANAsGEMENT OTTTER miL COUNTY Government ‘Services Center - ’540 West'Fir ■Fergus >Falus, ?MN'56537 PH; ^18-998^8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.coroTTER-TAiL'MN.us May 4, 2012 Carl E. Malmstrom Thorwaldsen.& Malmstrom, PLLP PO Box 1599 1105 Highway 10 East Detroit Lakes, MN 56502-1599 Re: File Copies, Matthew.& Bridget Cullen, Scalp Lake (56-358) Dear Mr. Malmstrom; Enclosed herein you will find copies of the file for Matthew^fc Bridget Cullen’s:property,locateVon Scalp Lake (56-358). .1 have enclosed copies of all permits .and'correspondence from 2005 to ' present. 1 ; Also enclosed you will :fmd an Invoice for the .copies in the amount of $27.42. l*lease submit .payment'to our'Office on or before May 25,2012. If you need any .additional information please contact our-Office. m: Sincerely, Amy Mark Permit Technician Enclosures 'I a Department of LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY Government Services Center - 540 West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 PH: 218-998-8095 OTTER Tail County’s Website: www.co.otter-tail.mn.us INVOICE May 4, 2012 BILLED TO; Carl E. Malmstrom Thorwaldsen & Malmstrom, PLLP PO Box 1599 1105 Highway 10 East Detroit Lakes, MN 56502-1599 $ 13.00 $ 5.04 $ 9.38 52 Copies @ .25 per copy Postage 30 minutes @ 18.77 Per Hour Total Due:$ 27.42 Copies of Matthew & Bridget Cullen’s File, Scalp Lake (56-358) Please make checks payable to Ottertail County Treasurer and return it to the attention of “Amy” please. Thank you. aJ: 9-I' THORWALDSEN & MALMSTROM, pllp PAUL R. THORWALDSEN ♦ CARL E. MALMSTROM LISA C. MORRISON • ROBERT P. THORWALDSEN JOHN C. QUAM, Retired MARY G. SORUM, Retired ATTORNEYS AT LAW POST OFFICE BOX 1599 1105 HIGHWAY 10 EAST DETROIT LAKES, MN 56502-1599 Phone: (218) 847-5646 FAX (218) 847-3950 May 2, 2012 Otter Tail County Land & Resource Management Government Services Center 540 Fir Ave. West Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Lot 3, Block 2, Scalp Lake Acres Tax Parcel No: 32000990479000 Current Owners: Matthew and Bridget Cullen Re: Please forward to my attention copies of all permits, letters, notes, and other documents pertaining to the above described property covering the period of 2005 to the present. If there is a charge for the copies, please let me know. Thank you very much for your assistance. Yours truly. P.1 Carl E. Malmstrom rs Donald Wallacec. "MSBA Board Certified Real Property Specialist ♦ Qualified ADR Neutral Civil & Family Alediation/Arbitration •Also licensed in South Dakota