Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout32000990373000_Variances_08-06-2009Variances Barcode 128 0^\2_C3CP» OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument #_ was filed/recorded inthis office d on the_ I ^ ____2009 at M u) ^tWpm tca)f, County 1061752 1061752 for rec nL.mWem Q 11 ^recording well certificwe0y ;(i<Z THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee ^ • pO iMAklO—COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number , Accepted By / Date PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE. ISOZ,MAILING ADDRESS 5lo-LAKE NAME lAi^ *5gVE'hl__________ TOWNSHIP 137 RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME 52,-000^*^- o3'l5-'OC>Ci S'z - o ci ^ o o oo LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASS 1SECTION PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS oasis' e.LAt^sE\;eh\ LEGAL DESCRIPTIONUoT I UoT | cJr iKkI. TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback X, Structure Size Sewage System ClusterSubdivision Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. ow (oo* SekVais^JC. 'pv^ljpos.e^ povtV\ i CoAtfC\o \S loxAiV-Iia 11a-c C^tJfVOL., "TWe •si -^VTovs/s lU-e. e>- ^YVO Vvvo^cX*^tAJ I IV V> C ©vVcs>|—, *5S* V AkZ><v.vs<_c_ iS> Y KC,>'TC|^ ,ns I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT R^ARDING THIS MATTER. 4~W- j(^//5/07 * DATE7 SIGNATURE OF PROP^f^T OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) .,oh ^ ^7 /^/n.TimeDate Of Hearing Motion Jane Nelson - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:45 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 38’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for a screen porch addition on the road side of the existing dwelling 62’ from the ordinary high water level with the condition that before a site permit for the proposed development can be granted the living quarters contained within the existing shed must be removed and the shed must be brought into compliance with the permit as issued. Crairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustfnent Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management [X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L R OfficiafrDate bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota August 6, 2009 Page # 3 Terry and Lori Kettner - Approved the variance as requested. (7:43 p.m.) Terry and Lori Kettner, Lot 2 Morrill Addition, Long Lake in Elizabeth Township, requested the following; A run of the drain field extends into the road right-of-way. Run #3 will exceed the right-of-way by 4’ and #4 will exceed the right-of- way by 8'. The required setback is 10' from the road right-of-way. Bill Schueller, designer, appeared with the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as described in the variance application dated July 14, 2009 and as depicted in the drawing submitted with the variance application. It was noted that there is no other location available for the placement of the proposed drain field. Jane Nelson - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:45 p.m.) Jane Nelson, Lot 1 Block 3 Jerrry-Marg Beach and Lot 1 of Jerry Marg Beach Second Addition, Lake Seven in Hobart Township, requested a variance of 38’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100' for a screen porch addition on the road side of the existing dwelling 62' from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. John Anderson, contractor, represented the applicant at the public hearing. A letter from Craig and Marcia Olson in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 38' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a screen porch addition on the road side of the existing dwelling 62’ from the ordinary high water level with the condition that before a site permit for the proposed development can be granted the living quarters contained within the existing shed must be removed and the shed must be brought into compliance with the permit as issued. Ron Ronken - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:50 p.m.) Ron Ronken, part of Lot 2 and all of Lot 3 Linden Park, East Battle Lake in Girard Township, requested the following: The old structure has nail kegs as corner foundations with small rocks cemented into it to create the foundation. Consequently the floor has sagged. With all of the poor foundation, the roof has an obvious sag. This old foundation 16’ by 23’ 6" would be replaced. The structure is currently 8’ from line and proposes to move the structure 10’ from line. Then move back wall against the garage for proper function of water drainage and looks. To change roof line to solve discharge of water properly. Install a targe gutter on the front diverting water away from the bluff. The proposed project will be approximately 56’ 6” from the ordinary high water level. Requesting a variance of 43’ 4” from the ordinary high water level. The proposed project is also located in the bluff impact zone. The project will begin approximately 11’ from the top of the bluff. Also proposing to do a 12’ by 9’ 1.5” addition to the cabin 76’ 6” from the ordinary high water level requesting a variance of 23’ 4”. Please note that the addition would be behind the building line and out of the bluff impact zone. Emails from Linda Moore, Ruth Brown, Roel Ronken and Scott and Beth Boyens in support of the variance as requested were read for the record. The applicant’s contractor appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was not polled as there was no one in attendance at the time of this public hearing. After discussion and consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and carried with Steve Schierer voting no and with Randall Mann abstaining to approve the proposed development as described in the variance application dated July 16, 2009 with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted that the proposed development will be 10’ from the side lot line and will be no closer to the bluff than the existing development. The variance as approved will provide the applicant with the ability to enjoy the same rights and privileges as others in this immediate area. Laurie Mullen - Tabled Laurie Mullen, Lot 8 of Shady Nook Beach Addition, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested the following: 1.) a variance of 5’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the extension of the existing breezeway 14’ toward the lake, and 2.) a variance of 41 ’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of an 8’ by 6’ pergola 59’ from the ordinary high water level. June 4, 2009 Meeting - Miles Anderson appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Lorena Kezar and William Karp expressing concerns with the variance as requested. A letter from Lorena M. Kezar in opposition to the variance as requested was not read at the public hearing as Ms, Kezar was in attendance and spoke on her on behalf. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to table, with the applicant's verbal permission, this hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicant and the Land and Resource Department the opportunity to determine if the proposed development is behind the string line. It was noted that there is no adequate hardship/practical difficulty that would allow for the granting of the side lot line variance as requested as the applicant has adequate room to place the structure 10’ from the side lot line. . m d '-Z''>..V I JZ Sr .-ac::-r-7 ¥rT"T I IUJ PK ' '.'r." t!I1; m Si lii i 3»•i4;.;ill il iKi>«.1 ii •■{""1 Tc Ue O r* 4^ Tc isie .1.I !I [ 1 !T "t 1 i.14.• f \I LiI4Se«EiHiWMG FORM-Ii Llj-r-Lht| 4 4 r;i ,.L.L...^2-(9(OQ^^-Q^75-QQQ ^ QQQ<^^-037^^ - OQQ Tax Parcel Number(s)l-i The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type, size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high water level(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. 1 4iI __1.. 1 |N)Z.W =■I % Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) Scale4...r H-l.h.!..Lt“r.Lhtt"!-..J-4....4..1..f-4.....hf...j...t'-4^..:J -t..f 4r..t:r ■ T't:4-t"1 I..4.p.t 4..i 4I1-!I >ST I-r-t "f \i..tjr-ij1„/zd II 14 - t-itI i I i.rLi.,..IIIT T f,m ................................'■:! tin1t”ITit4T L f (4 4-(|I i I _jJ-1 4-n! i4-j--I iIrrfi !IL"t 1432::I ■I t::iU:rT[ ■rU4-4 I4-:.t _lfohIr141t"f L7t.J -w] ■J 4b j’°bi I.1in -I “Ti ,rT“i.■crA^ifKILi TiTt Mi 1 _ I I4t-r 1'r-4- izc -i VI 4!IJ.4 '-'og^y4.,Utldsfr iqTI f 34-I-f II1"•r i Ni kI T J i4II t4 4 20-Lh ,.LV(Q ..LTI 5„L|Vf :.i8G>^t ,4 L 4-i.40.■■ CD !)9 J,...I, 4 t--h p t•~r-1 J iif-l-tTI>--t-4 (a)luT"I I z I -I iiL 4..t:cj?-z 150,':u t,.i—t 12I 2nIlb4.r 1:1 ■4.4tZIS!r*'r VO1:1:LD V-r-4tt'1 :?t -□i i I I-i "T -L_ -I 11r4 f J--I f'TI..J lI4.T ■i TI-iIrXtt“t Ti I f TI tt"1f V 1:Ii I[I !Ij ”! I K ..L..-b,1 r\¥I -1--_L.4.4. T 1-^..,4.L L.L4- ; ..T -4+4'I ^o\N, ::1:r:t.. --bf- I 1 r-r"H j I i I.IrI 1:1 ■4n Itt 4.,-4- I 11Ii_J_■~TI -h...L 4—T-rI1,.4 4 [J.t-;rr'""I ,1...........i:ri.l..!-r-H4 r T , iJY1 4:1 +I ■r IX4t..4...I..L ::::uIi,4.4 rI 4.tt T'I t.14. i 1.t/ju. ' ' 14 ' ! 111 T'^^t i---------1.....L 329.086-»-Victof.LundeenlCoi.PnnJers-«-Fergus Falls. MN •I 4 I 4 frli-i-X+L-m+H :4Hr:.r ^\^J>ii 14I <J- ■f "I-4..i--l-U-4..U.4-n.u iJ bI I,fItj Siighature bflVPPerty Own'er| , |i [I -It lBk!-i0207li..T' +H-H-l-41-t; 3464a70I1-800-1 I -•1-T'('i I I I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): 15^0 Ft2Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s): 1 'SSiQ Ft2Driveway(s): O Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s): Ft2Stairway(s): -50 Ft2Retaining Wall(s): Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 3(fQ Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: -t Z'looa Ft2LOT AREA: u.^1silo= ■ l\^(^ zic>c>c>X100 =% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOTOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT AREA