HomeMy WebLinkAbout32000090072000_Variances_12-14-2000Variances
Barcode 128
VL-\H'ZbOO
OffICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that^
this instrument # 8*74GG0
filed/recordedhlhis office
for record on the \q d»v of
—2000 at
ecorder^
874GG0
was
Wend^
by:
m i?^ r^^recording
-------------^well certificate
X —
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 739-2271
*** COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK***/SO —Application Fee
Receipt Number
catg.:)33^-i.7er-3u(U,
_________________DAYTIME PHONE ,
r^ls; ~
j/vllsSirjM~ HLC-t-S-^ Kls —(jjiJi
KfKT^PROPERTY OWNER
3<o2-bCp^ 5o<f Iti sir., F'rYjL3
_________2g>tg CiQi’QV l AKiglADDRESS
RD.LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME7-f<D6AlQ.-r
ICs TOWNSHIP I3T RANGE 4^ TOWNSHIP NAME HO<g?ARJT
LAKE CLASS
SECTION
, 3(^2. S-<^5c3^00O - I lo-0)3U ^OOCvPARCEL NUMBER FIRE / LAKE I.D. NUMBER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION5-j- ^o<5jrTer’ fc* Sc^rh^ScLsT" c^ooTTeto dtf 5c?cT"<orL'^,Tc>ccash.(p t3Y^
ci>x^TK<2iE\xcr^<D'tf "Five. <^i<3 c'THcociS i ^ocjjf^cooifTlac.5<!!<jTi'i,ecLS~r<^o<a.c^<5‘o
lo(jL><ijshxp (3T ivIbr’T'ii-^ KPjru^-^hi ^JersT" <RfTk£r. Pr^uTCtpoL [cjUIO cutdih^her *
JOcHTa..sVyXic.pobCcc Iniq^i/m^OLu— anxi. <JoCc:aitnc»'i^ UcTj2-a.ujdLT\M^ ^JorTtvcLiesT c^ucu'Tcr-o's-
TKc iLtorTTijaas-r €{c,^sc^c' icfcX14., lu^ i 3-7, 4o. O-TterTblXcLootvI^c^ ,
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
structure Setback___Structure Size X Sewage System Misc. KClusterSubdivision
SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED\aJOA-*5 _ 1C' X ' C 3-AO tr-Ci ou;i(AdLooi^ , cudja-jr sirninx^ (esr
CMToL t'tooT^ 1,6>3 Tea DYjStc.l'x- iTua-zcv l/ioosc^ .. h.t<^ K oLoobi<£_ e<i?ic'''QJLcs c:^cop-s^
peoJCoY nooTf.^ it'-(^troiru (ocoesT^ ^audljoiuitH-fj ^rod>ifu:L t«o<si.
hL-.ZD
NOV - 8 2000
LANDS !■■': ■;rcE
I UNDERSTAND THAT i HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO
CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
/Cr-C>, r/ Zc —
' SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER
r\) jla-.u / DATE
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
Decembe^^aooo , 2^ _oa !
M ^>iLl
IziI^L /
//'8Accepted By Land & Resource 'OO
L & R Official/Date
& P^.,T^ 6erC TimeDate Of Hearing /y
✓
Motion
Kate VanDerveer - Denied
Motion was made by Mark Steuart, second by Steve Schierer and carried with David Trites voting no, to deny the
variance as requested as no hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the
variances as requested. After additional consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Mark Steuart
and unanimously carried, to require the applicant to bring the proposed structure into compliance with the
requirements of the ordinance by June 30, 2001. It was noted that had the applicant requested these variances prior
to the construction of the structure the Board would not have approved variances for both the height and width of the
structure. It was also noted that the structure does meet many of the requirements of a water oriented accessory
structure.
/
Chairman/Otter Tail County^ard of Adjustment
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR
L R Official/Date
bk 0198-001
291.306 • Victor Lurtdeon Co.. Printori • Forgut Fails. Minnasoia
12/14/00------ 6:30 P.M.
David and Kate VanDerveer
Rose Lake, hobart Township
This property and home are owned by David and Kate VanDerveer. They bought this property
approximately eight years ago from Ralph Shippee who was granted a lifetime residence in his farm
House that is the only other home on this property. 1 am representing Dave and Kate who reside in Kansas
City, Kansas. 1 am Kate’s father.
This home was built in complete compliance with recommendations from Land & Resource office.
I remember that they suggested a change in the house location that has been a benefit for Dave and Kate
and completely satisfied the requirements of Land and Resource Management.
Dave and Kate have felt for sometime that a WOAS should be built to provide security for water
Craft and other lake items. They are seldom on this property during the winter months and there are
No neighbors within sight of their home to keep an eye on the lakeshore property. The property is
Very isolated - please note property diagram.
A mistake was made this past fall. They should have applied for a Variance rather than start with
The application for a Site Permit. They were anxious to get a structure built before frost - winter set in.
The bluff that extends the entire length of their property along the lake makes it very difficult to carry
Water craft (sailboat. Canoe, Paddleboat, etc. plus a 40 ft. Weed Roller) and other inflatables. The
Possibility of vandalism is of real concern in this location when no one is on the property.
The shed (W.O.A.S.) was built large enough to accommodate the above mentioned items plus
Several deck chairs and a fishing boat. The largest single unit is the weed roller. It is stored in two
Lengths - the longer section is approximately 22 ft, 6 inches. The other length is slightly shorter.
This unit has a vertical attachment that is to be stored in a vertical position and is approximately 8ft. in
length. This is the reason the shed was made 24 feet in length. The height of the shed is 6 feet at the
Comers and 8 feet at the peak. This allows the double doors to be 6 feet high. If the building were
Reduced 1 l/2ft. in height to meet the present ordinance the opening height of the doors would bereduced
to 4 l/2ft. in height. This would not be a safe height for carrying weed roller, canoe, sailboat, etc. in
And out of the shed.
Just for the record, this shed is 10’ X 24’ and has double doors on the west end, no windows, light
Switch inside, pitched roof with asphalt shingles - the same as the main house and cedar shingle siding.
The same as the main house. It is 20 ft. from the Ordinary High Water Mark and has not been dug into
The slope of the bluff so that the natural drainage remains untouched. Pictures of 'this shed are on the
Next page.
■Pi
r-/ ...
wA
L,mj
/teoj\
\
r S''^A
.V ,
<2l>li^.4 i
i?-•IJ Lv
\
>
\i**
i;
• C-^
opetA-)
^ ij'X)Ucr
3^c^ loiv>5
{rcj^cblC. pi
t/<erTtc(jLC''
'Y -pT. s(^cUc
o<
/(-
'l, :1% CV\ly cs^llc-^ A
-C
f
IS
*'C. I
Ad 4 IO ' ■<'1^IS cx^eClA/^
(11.S
<5 ee .Vi
> ■■ •v^-■;S
•
, .> “*■**
<>■■ ■ .:.
■;
■4 ""'^
«,-■ ^ mm
■' '^•':
'■ ■
■r «-v-•?
i .^”
'.p
iM'.'
' •' v#^•• -1'^ .-„;i,,**
l^.
-■T 4 ;f- '
' *<:1
\ 5 ^ , d; pi..»■-
%i:
1'.'
t
«
^l^
1"1"inch(es) equals _____
0K5 IK!5ls:r Dfe,AUJiK)G-
.grid(s) equals ^0
citsT ikiser peAcotiJo-
feetfeet, orScale;
Please use this sheet for the required scale drawing of your proposal. Be sure to include lot dimension, water
frontage, and setbacks from RW, lake, lot lines, sewage system, top of bluff, existing structures and all imper
vious surface.
Required impervious surface coverage calculation (See definition in Shoreland Management Ordinance)
Total Lot Area
(FT2)
DM A %X 100 =
Total Impervious
Surface Onsite
(FT2)
H
uT 3300^-4
i.rtoo' ^ So'(pc>
Q<'
24'
t 0^^<0Id'SMEC?
fZo'45^I
t15'tZ.4 7^'ParfKhoose
S'\ft'
B.ftd.rrL
iStjuTe'IO "
(^OSEL i-AKEl I
I
IRECi:r;ED
NOV - 8 2000 I
Lot Oo'TLit^^
NfoTe.; Mo otkeir,
0(1^ 5ue.o^ Aut-
^Q.(J><rru(^^S /4R.E:
SKocotJ ^^el^-£L
UND & RLoOURCE
I
KdOO'
■54 =:0
> r
tooRcsfe: If^KEL
// /y /o-g Dated
300.816 • Victor Lundeen Co - Printers • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-800-346-4570BK — 0500 — 029
R£Ci.T'£0
NOV -8^0^)0
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT a r-£^•URce
I UNDERSTAND THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF OF THE
OFFICE OF LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEMBERS/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEMBERS, MAY NOT
BE ABLE TO VIEW THE PROPERTY FOR WHICH A CONDITIONAL
USE/VARIANCE HAS BEEN REQUESTED DUE TO SNOW COVER.
A RESULT, IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE FOR OTTER TAIL COUNTY
TO MEET THE LEGAL REQUIREMENT TO TAKE ACTION WITHIN 60
AS
IDAYS OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION.
UNDERSTAND THAT IN THE ABSENCE OF A WAIVER OF THE 60
DAY REQURIEMENT, THE COUNTY MAY HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE BUT
TO DENY THE APPLICATION. THEREFORE, I HEREBY AGREE TO
WAIVE THE 60 DAY TIME LIMIT IN ORDER TO ALLOW TIME FOR
THE STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO VIEW THE PROPERTY BEFORE TAKING ACTION ON MY
APPLICATION.
//do
APPLICANTDATED
THIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS TO BE SIGNED BETWEEN OCT & MCH
FORMLTRS/6 0 DAYACK