Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout28000060047002_Variances_07-03-2003932800/'OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that 932800 this instrument #_^--------------------- was filed/recorded m this officefor record on the _2__/“'A 2003 at ^ Qf)atWpm) Wendy L^etdalf, pounty R^^order hy ( X (hcJi^ recording fee ' weli certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted by / Date ^ C)\l DAYTIME PHONEc^ f ^ "73 C>~L?¥ PROPERTY OWNER 6/ .rnn ^ -3 </ g r rf / Q.A rMAILING ADDRESS. n O r> i ^ TOWNSHIP / ^ ^ RANGE 0^/3< TOWNSHIP NAME LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS LaSECTION PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESSR:X^OOOC) U>Q6^'7 000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4xr , arTd CjzrTfT ■s-Zj > pi\x \r-t TcTrTTT S6/v /767yvc^^/ TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Subdivision ^ Ciuster Misc. VStructure Setback Structure Size Sewage System SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED S €. I ( ^ d> T s e 4 r To^ ' 6 S • Gr f 5" ctT ^.5 ach-e6 <i / lo~t 3 I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLiED FOR A VARiANCE FROM THE REQUiREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDiNANCE/SUBDIViSION CONTROLS ORDiNANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. OH/.<2yr\yy\Ui 'DATESIGMAF PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) f'ra I 3^ -QUO Uf 3 5 -00 I f-oV />rinuJUDate Of Hearing Time Motion Dennis Splittgerber - Approved as requested with a condition. (8:07 p.m.) Motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by Randall Mann and carried with Mark Steuart voting no, to approve a variance to subdivide, by metes and bounds description, three parcels as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application from an existing 80.52 acre tract with the condition that a registered surveyor’s drawing must be presented at the time of conveyance. It was noted that the proposed lots meet and/or exceed the minimum size requirements for platted back lots in a general development area. It was also noted that this action of the board is consistent with past actions. 1 \\O'0 ;1:;dUo"'K Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No MMCopy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR ^{^0 • Y~ L R Official/Date ''■■Q OMipiy iionrd of AdiLP^imont BK-0402-001 311 491 • Victor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-80O-346-4870L;;i;:d & f’PSiHP'co o.or-o';\f CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY1NE COR. OF J SEC.6, T.U4, R.42 PROPOSED DESCRIPTION- PARCEL AVFOR; DENNIS SPLITTGERBER PART OF THE NEl/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 134, RANGE 42 OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MN. CO Thot port of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 134, Range 42. Otter Toil County, Minnesota described os follows: 589*50’13"E 265.00 00 I Commencing at the northeast corner of soid Section 6; thence South 01 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds West on on assumed bearing along the east line of said Section 6 a distance of 1,855.25 feet to the point of beginning of the porcel to be described: thence continuing South 01 d^rees 26 minutes 48 seconds West along said east tine a distance of 350.09 feet: thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 484.13 feet; thence North 33 degrees 08 minutes 58 seconds East o distonce of 417.26 feet: thence South 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds Eost a distonce of 265.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 131,097 squore feet or 3.00 acres, more or less. /i\ N <d 1001000 I SCALE Scole: 1 Inch ■ 1CX) Feet FEETIN CT) u X . O LEGEND Subject to roodwoys and easements of record, if ony.\C)v'PROPOSED DESCRIPTION- PARCEL Bm• = DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O = IRON ROD SET AND MARKED WITH LAND SURVEYOR NO. 40827. PARCEL A ro That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 134, Range 42. Otter Tail County, Minnesota described as follows: ^<0 \ft)•O CN GENERAL NOTESo Commencing at the northeost corner of said Section 6: thence South 01 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds West on on assumed beoring along the east line of said Section 6 o distonce of 2.205.34 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence continuing South 01 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds West along soid east line a distance of 225.06 feet: thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 484,13 feet: thence North 01 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds East a distance of 225.06 feet; thence South 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds East a distance of 484.13 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 108,928 square feet or 2.50 acres, more or less. O 1.) Bearings are assumed.< T-ca X r\450 ±' Y '/ N89‘50’13"W 484.13/ I I/1-- VICINITY MAPIV,\ Subject to roodwoys and easements of record, if any.SEC.6, T.134, R.42 PROPOSED DESCRIPTION- PARCEL Ctotoo5q1 ^\That port of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6. Township 134, Range 42. Otter Tail County, Minnesoto described os follows: inin scvCMCMPARCEL B I /• N b I / CMCM 1LvQZ:I I 1 itooXs'Commencing ot the northeast corner of said Section 6; thence South 01 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds West on on ossumed bearing along the east line of soid Section 6 a distance of 2,430.40 feet to the point of beginning of the porcel to be described: thence continuing South 01 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds West along said east line o distonce of 225.06 feet to the Eost Quarter corner of said Section 6: thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds West along the cost—west quarter line of sold Section 6 a distonce of 484.13 feet: thence North 01 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds Eost o distance of 225.06 feet: thence South 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds East o distonce of 484.13 feet to the point of beginning. Contoining 108,928 square feet or 2.50 ocres, more or less. Subject to roodwoys ond easements of record, If any. in I’M'00/CN aN89’50’13”W CO . IL X J484.13 Klu5o-LU s f V' /00 ui’N’ J00 CN to oo IlOinPARCEL C CMCM CMCMyX J 1 hereby certify that the subdivided property described in this survey meets the County requirements for public rood access ond sewoge treatment systems. ///NOT TO SCALEEl/4 COR. OF SEC.6, T.IJ4, R.42'\S. LINE OF NEI/4 OF f SEC.6, T.134, R.42I I Pro^^ Owner ^ ”” (J Dote v/// /Na9'49’58”W 484.13 600 ±7 f CUENTI hereby certify Ihot (his survey. i>lfln or report ws prepared by me or _under rny direct superveion and thot I om a duly Licensed Lend \Suhevor ladcribe toirs of Ihe.jStote of Uirmesoto. tki^ner. U>nncsot<y{icff^ No. 40827 Dafe 'EV1SI0NS * lOOCO UNHUffO LAKE TICSro cEjnYXATt Of suAfr fMC nu not PART OF THE ME1/4 OF SECTION 6, T.134, R.42 OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKE REGION SURVEYING. INC. ^.O. 1K>X M2. 47 N. BROADWAY PWLICAM RAPDS, MRRC80TA, 60672 PH. (218) 806-n06 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYan 0 us nu mm DENNIS 8PUTTGERBER3/03 0W9 DomH,Wr' -AWIKG "ir; \?0Q?' l06-SP1in-:ri>iii lA »tir!!-w Page # 4 'r Keith and Debra Mickelson - Denied. (7:45 p.m.) Keith and Debra Mickelson, Lots 73, 74, 75 and 76, Sater-Humphrey Ranch Camp, Ten Mile Lake in Tumuli Township, requested a variance to build a 32' by 32’ garage, 8, feet from the drain field instead of the recommended 20’ setback. We have met all the other requirements on setbacks for our project. We will erect a temporary snow fence around drain field during construction so the drain field is not damaged. This will allow us to attach to our existing dwelling. We will be constructing the garage on the existing slab and driveway to stay within the 25% imperious surface. We have looked at other locations on our lot and they would obstruct the view of the lake from the road and we would be over the recommended 25% imperious surface. The audience was polled with Harland Martinson speaking for the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Mark Steuart, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as the applicants’ request would establish a precedence that the Board of Adjustment does not wish to establish by placing an attached garage less than 20’ from a drain field. It was noted that a reasonable use of the applicants’ property could be obtained without the granting of the variance as requested. Roger and Kathleen Grewatz - Approved as requested. (7:56 p.m.) Roger and Kathleen Grewatz, part of Sub Lot A of Government Lot 1, Section 17 of Hobart Township by Rose Lake, requested a variance of 30’ from the required wetland setback of 50’ for the location of a drain field 20’ from the wetland. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, second by Robert Schwartz and carried with Cecil Femling voting no, to approve a variance of 30’ from the required wetland setback of 50’ for the location of a drain field 20’ from the wetland. It was noted that the approval of this request is being based on Kyle Westergard’s statement that this is the only available location for the drain field and that the proposed system meets all other requirements including the vertical separation requirement. It was also noted that based on the information provided by Kyle Westergard the same motion would have been made had the variance request come before the Board of Adjustment prior to the start of the installation of the system. Dennis Splittgerber- Approved as requested with a condition. (8:07 p.m.) Dennis Splittgerber, part of the Northeast Quarter, Section 6 of Friberg Township by an unnamed lake, requested a variance to subdivide, by metes and bounds description, three parcels from an existing 80.52 acre tract. Two parcels would have 2.5 acres each and the other parcel would have 3 acres. Minimum size for metes and bounds parcels within the shoreland area is 5 acres,'Bud Nelson, realtor, appeared along with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by Randall Mann and carried with Mark Steuart voting no, to approve a variance to subdivide, by metes and bounds description, three parcels as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application from an existing 80.52 acre tract with the condition that a registered surveyor’s drawing must be presented at the time of conveyance. It was noted that the proposed lots meet and/or exceed the minimum size requirements for platted back lots in a general development area. It was also noted that this action of the board is consistent with past actions. Randall J. Stoick - Approved as modified and with a condition. (8:18 p.m.) Randall J. Stoick, part of Government Lot 4, Section 27 of Lida Township by Lake Lida, requested a variance of 4.5’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for a 12’ by 20’ addition to an existing structure being 5.5’ from the side lot line at its nearest point. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Paul Larson, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 5' from the side lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of a 14’ by 20’ addition to the main portion of the cabin 5’ from the side lot line with the condition that an existing 8’ by 9’ shed and an existing 8’ by 25’ shed must be removed before a site permit can be issued for the proposed development. Hardship is a substandard lot of record.