HomeMy WebLinkAbout25000070038002_Variances_12-02-2010Variances
2
Barcode 128
''2\oil2jOlO
I 1
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that
this instrument #_
was filed/recorded in this office■cLonthe_2-----day of ^
___2010 atJdlD-^nnj/pm
Wendy L. Metqalf, Qouiity|Rec^r^r
by: 1AJj2. ^
1085097
1085097
for recor
.iDefwrty
/Recording fee
well certifica^
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 998-8095
Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us
Application Fee
\AAn&^COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number
Accepted By / Date U~^10"\0
^0 &0'—\. DAYTIME PHONE ^ S'-CoPROPERTY OWNER
SGSS7MAILING ADDRESS 1 Oc, Kw >eo.^
LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME AO___LAKE CLASS
iz 1/ e^'l131>'7 RANGE TOWNSHIP NAMESECTIONTOWNSHIP
PARCEL , _NUMBER OQOO 7 QG QO X E-911
ADDRESS
A>cyf(|g , /V| h
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SSfUo.-v O'?
► *SO fVL.
Scjv»i^ otP S /Cjo LK <^c,llccP Aoi d SC> L-,
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
structure Setback ^^^tructure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster MIsc.
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS
THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION.
L /o~^ )S /CXj P-f Cj_> 5o (S (v/ r-iot., /<s/4>
h^e c.U<5»-»
'Z-, sk^\^^cfc c c
OHU^L. (JUa^fcJ
4. ~|-C> dCfAcz-tA ^TCJC'S'g-
‘^*11 ✓'g oo rcl. •
f^elC4 OCiSsf-, 4
i-uv^ io 5»«e A-V <2.^oSr*«- Aa
Op-*?
S Wtai"*Air<u_^
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORblNANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSl
RESOURCE MAh
ND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND &
sfeMENT REGARDIIIG THIS MATTER.
//9 ^0/0
SIGNATURE OF PROPERT^ )WNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATI
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
'2/^- o7-TimeDate Of Hearing
Motion
Steven and Diane Swanson - Approved the variance appiication as modified with a condition. (7:20 p.m.)
After discussion and consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to declare Lot
B Danielson Survey Lots of Government Lot 3 buildable for residential purposes and to approve placement of the proposed
development no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure, which is approximately 85' from the ordinary
high water level with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with imperious surfaces.
Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No • %
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR
L R/Official/Date
bk 0407-001
329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota
SCALE DRAWING FORM• I.
^^OOOO ~7 0& c>o :x
Tax Parcel Number(s)
The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scaie (feet), ail existing and/or proposed structures, septic
tanks, drainfields, lotiines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. biuffs), and onsite impervious surface
calculations.
— "z.I %Scale Impervious Surface Ratio
(Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side)
o n
i
i f *■
U'iD-‘0
/A
rxY-ix-1i AS5
-i p— —, _I iCvi^4'<«
I. __ L _ J
--r
I
Co t)!"
I3I
ISiWy 'TO
T
CjUi ll renoo-e
7T ponoU
i_L Cix)(\i«/
0 W p^vfd
aHvio
cnJor?
0N/
M-
•>J
X<?
’
/s
.1
(\^^3
// °\ hSignature of Pr^ irty Owner Date
BK — 0909 338.596 • Victor Lundeen Co, Printers • Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800-346-4870
J*
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION-WORKSHEET:
List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing):
Ft2 sStructure(s):
Ft2Deck(s):
I'ZuCpHl. R2Driveway(s);
l!iy_Ft2Patio(s):
Ft2Sidewalk(s):
Ft2Stairway(s):
Ft2Retaining Wall(s):
Ft2Landscaping:
(Plastic Barrier)
Other:Ft2
Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:
'2,'T-^O SC> f\2LOT AREA:
X100 =V7-,6 ,%
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO
I
■ '-y
December 2, 2010
Page # 2
Clifford McLain and Janeen Virnala - Approve variance requests 1 and 3 and denied variance request 2. (6:55 p.m.)
Clifford McLain and Janeen Virnala, Sub Lot 3 of Government Lot 1, Section 27 of Dunn Township by Franklin Lake,
requested the following: 1.) Requesting a 30’ variance from ordinary high water level for proposed home being 70’
from ordinary high water level. Required setback is 100’. 2.) Requesting a 5’ variance from septic tank for proposed
garage being 5’ from septic tank. Required setback is 10’. 3.) Requesting a 32’ variance from ordinary high water
level for proposed relocated shed being 68’ from ordinary high water level. Required setback is 100.’ Rob lllg.
Surveyor appeared with the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or
against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Thomas Lee made a motion, second by Steve
Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 30’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of
100’ for the placement of a dwelling 70’ from the ordinary high water level, to approve a variance of 32’ from the
ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10’ by 12’ shed 68’ from the ordinary high water level
and to deny the variance as requested for the placement of the proposed garage 5’ from the existing septic tank. The
dwelling setback as approved is consistent with other dwellings in this immediate area. The variances as approved
do provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property. Also, the variances as approved do not directly or
indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development.
James and Alan Carlson - Approve ordinary high water ievel variance and denied iot line variance. (7:02 p.m.)
James and Alan Carlson, Lot 21 Bergsten North Shore Park, Crane Lake in Clitherall Township, requested a variance
of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 3.5’ from the required side lot line
setback of 10’ for the placement of a 24’ by 24’ garage 50’ from the ordinary high water level and 6.5’ from the lot line.
James and Sue Carlson represented the application at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one
speaking for or against the variance as requested. An email from Ralph and Eliie Twardowski requesting a 10’ side
lot line setback was read for the record. A phone call from Bruce Larson was noted. Mr. Larson expressed concern
with impervious surface coverage and wanted to encourage the applicants to make sure they knew where the road
right-of-way is located. After discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and
unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and to
deny the variance as requested from the side lot line for the placement of a garage 50’ from the ordinary high water
level and at least 10’ from the side lot line with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be
covered with impervious surfaces. It should be noted that the variance as approved provides the applicants with the
ability to tie the roof of the proposed garage into the roof of the existing cabin. The variance as approved does
provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property.
Reid Bonrud - Approved the variance application as modified. (7:12 p.m.)
Reid Bonrud, part of Government Lot 7, Section 17 of Tumuli Township by North Ten Mile Lake, requested a variance
of 182’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200' for the placement of a 30’ by 50’ dwelling 18’ from
the ordinary high water level. Amy Bonrud was also in attendance at the public hearing. The audience was polled
with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer
made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 150’ from the required
ordinary high water level setback of 200' for the placement of a dwelling at least 50’ from the ordinary high water level.
It was noted that the variance as approved will provide the applicant with a reasonable use of his property. It was also
noted that the size of the proposed dwelling is not an issue as long as the setback is at least 50’ from the ordinary
high water level and as long as no other variances are required.
Steven and Diane Swanson - Approved the variance application as modified with a condition. (7:20 p.m.)
Steven and Diane Swanson, Lot B Danielson Survey Lots of Government Lot 3, Section 7 of Everts Township by Deer
Lake, requested a variance to have Lot B Danielson Survey Lots of Government Lot 3 declared buildable for
residential purposes and a variance of 24’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the
placement of a dwelling 76’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or
against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by
Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to declare Lot B Danielson Survey Lots of Government Lot 3 buildable for
residential purposes and to approve placement of the proposed development no closer to the ordinary high water
level than the existing structure, which is approximately 85’ from the ordinary high water level with the condition that
no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with imperious surfaces.
V
WAIVER OF 60-DAY RULE
THIS WAIVER MUST BE FILED AND SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF LAND &
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BETWEEN OCTOBER 1^^ & MARCH 1^^
I understand that, due to snow cover, the Planning Commission Members
and/or the Board of Adjustment Members may not be able to view my
property/project (Tax Parcel # z^QQQ<-> ~7oc:> 3
described in my
dated
_______________________ Application
. As a result, it may not be possible for
Otter Tail County to meet the legal requirement to take action within 60
days of the receipt of the completed Application(s). I understand that in the
absence of a waiver of the 60-Day Requirement, the County may have no
alternative but to deny my Application(s). Therefore, I hereby agree to
waive the 60-day time limit in order to allow time for the Planning
Commission Members and/or Board of Adjustment Members to view the
property before taking action on my Application(s()/
// / ^ 7/0
DATED \imER
n
PROPERTY O
11-02-04
Mbowman forms-apps waiver 60 day rule