Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout55000990340000_Conditional Use Permits_07-08-2015rg OTTER TAIL COUNTY ,:0O Conditional Use Permit # Owner’s Name _______________ Property Address (-6 *1 ___________,, Location; LakeNrfj^^ Sec. M Twp. lyf Range *f^Twp.Nam^C*-*lit*^ oHO-OOQ / WorJ< Authorized: UMsifcH.'fa.w uni ¥Ju»f AtmAJer t ls>kAf^ i d> Ktftf iWt^cWV Tyv^iftiiei Tofa.. <p ^ ( cfff V It ^ tw<-jSiL-ho IS (,i7r? * m «»7)0~«>00c_>CO Si 4-l-Zoti, Land and mesource Management Official / Date Valid:Expires: 1. Entire area shall be stabilized within 10 days of the completion of any earthmoving unless othenwise stated. 2. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that may occur. 3. If the terms of this permit are violated the entire permit may be revoked and the owner may be subject to legal prosecution. 4. This card shall be placed in a conspicuous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is to be done, and shall be maintained there until completion of such work. 5. NOTIFY DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, TELEPHONE (218) 998-8095, WHEN AUTHORIZED WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED.BK-1004-046 319,993 • Victor LundMn Co . Printort • Foreut FMs, MN • 1-800-346-4870 1165071 Date Stamp CAROL SCHMALTZ OTTER TAIL COUNTY RECORDER FERGUS FALLS, MN RECORDED ON 10/01/2015 11:29 AMr—CO CO LOCO WHO8 FEE: 4©.00 PAGES 2 WELL CERTIFICATE RECD: NX CO i resourceMeland L&R Initial THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / INTERIM USE PERMIT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date DAYTIME PHONE 70cl' O /K^PROPERTY OWNER(S) ^ MAILING ADDRESS O f LAKE NUMBERJ^>7.?Cc?- LAKE NAME //n AcaJtj^ / G t>.LAKE CLASS RANGE f TOWNSHIP NAME ^ c, tv/yr ^/j? ^ du/’P'f TOWNSHIP ! 3 7SECTIONLL •S~J-£}ao^j oJ^oxjeo S'SoO(J YYC)3H t ‘TSt^C c Y y /e> /' Y PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS //A. df Resc> Gj^ci -n Tc^/P ^<31 F-^ aifd ' a^eJdt'i < i LEGAL DESCRIPTION f O' i jL u, Please check the appropriate requests CONDITIONAL USE PROJECT____ Topographical Alteration y Commercial Use___ Cluster Development___ Extractive Use Forest Land Conversion _ INTERIM USE PROJECT Existing Dwelling Removal____ Existing Dwelling Repurposing____ Industrial Use Commercial WECS Miscellaneous SPECIFY YOUR REQUEST. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. JSlf.C<_ /;L'y/ur,t(^ ^'<r^ /> r/. Oyi a^ptailAhu^Zell^ iiLkoO . i- M. /V ^SrANNFD I UNDERSTAND THAT APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST APPLIES ONLY TO THE U^ OF THE LAND. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED; IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. G ^ fs i/SlGNATURp^F PROPE OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 351 825 • Victor Lundeen Co Printers • Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800-346-4870 7-3nTimeDate Of Planning Commission Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation September 9. 2015 - Motion: A motion by Wilson, second by Frazier to approve provided: 1. The Applicant follows the soils recommendations in the report from Northern Technologies Inc. 2. An engineer is onsite to oversee this project. 3. A more permeable patio is installed in the fire pit area. This project will assist in stabilizing the area. _ Sm Chairman/otter Tail Coqnty Planning Commission County Board Action s/^ Approved As Recommended Denied As Recommended Other 9/W Date of Final ActionChairman/Otter Tail Cbijnty Board of Commissioners f| .. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #L & R Official/Date • ^ INTERIM USE PERMIT # L & R Official/DatePermit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and MN DNR L & R Official/Date bk 08012013-006 OTC Board of Commissioners’ Minutes September 22, 2015 Page 3 WHEREAS, misunderstandings exist about mental illness and social culture often wrongly imposess stigma on mental illness that discourages people from seeking help when they need it; and WHEREAS, every citizen and community can make a difference in helping to improve the lives of individuals and families affected by mental illness; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Commissioners of Otter Tail County, Minnesota do hereby proclaim October 4“* thru October 10**', 2015 as Mental Illness Awareness Week in Otter Tail County to increase public awareness of mental illness and to promote treatment and recovery. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Commissioner Froemming, duly seconded by Commissioner Rogness and, after vote being taken thereon with Commissioner Huebsch absent, the following voted in favor Commissioners Johnson, Lindquist, Froemming, and Rogness and the following voted against the same: None . ^ :Adopted at Fergus Falls, MN this 22 day of September 2015 OTTER TAIL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSDated: StS'By: Attest:John Lindquist, Chair Larry Krohn, Clerk ■K Animat Controls Ordinance General discussion took place regarding puppy mills and cruelty to animals. Motion by Johnson, second by Froemming, and unanimously carried to refer the topic of Animal Control to the Ag Advisory Committee. Planning Commission Recommendations Conditional Use Permit - Steven Lind & Todd Axtman: Motion by Froemming, second by Rogness, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit for topographical alterations for a future residence as submitted in the revis^ plan dated August 18, 2015. The rock retaining wall may be constructed this fall provided it is completed by November 1, 2015. The project is located at R GL 4 SWIy of McDonald Shores 1®’ Addn., Section 20 of Edna Township: Big McDonald Lake (56-386), RD. Conditional Use Permit - Euaene & Michelle Eroeldina: Motion by Johnson, second by Rogness, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit for topographical work with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission at their September 9, 2015 meeting. The project is located in Lake View Beach 2"^ Addition NW 12’ of Lot 14 & all of 15 & 16 and Lake View Beach 2"*^ Addition Res Lot B of BIk 1 & NW 12’ of Res C, Section 11 of Scambler Township: Pelican Lake (56-786), GD. Conditional Use Permit - Ed Smith: Motion by Rogness, second by Froemming, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit to replace a failing retaining wall as presented. The project is located in Pleasure Park Resort, Lot 2 BIk 1 & 2 not to be split. Section 4 of Otter Tail Township; Otter Tail Lake (56-242), GD. otter I ail County, Planning Commission September 9, 2015; Page 2 Steven Lind & Todd Axtman - Approved Revised Plan: Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated byjhe Applicant on the Application): Please consider this application for the alteration of an existing 33' road easement and related topographical alterations for a future residence. The project proposes to slightly alter the existing road easement on a portion of the property while installing a new entry road utilizing the requested easement relocation as well as a portion of the existing road easement. This would provide for a turnaround, parking area and future WOAS structure access. The project also proposes to install two boulder walls, one to the NE of the future residence for privacy and plantings as well as one to the SW for protection of the wetland and to attain transition to the future residence. The project improvements propose to excavate and/or fill approximately 1900 CY of soil including new topsoil for seeding. The highest point of fill in any one area would not exceed four feet. The abandoned portion of old easement will be landscaped with trees & turf. New easement will be legally updated and recorded. A portion of JFC Trust property connection to cul-de-sac will be re-established to turf and existing road removed Parcel # 20-000-99-0867-000. The project is located at Pt GL 4 SWiy of McDonald Shores Addn., Section 20 of Edna Township; Big McDonald Lake (56-386), RD. Motion - July 15. 2015: A motion by Wilson, second by Gabe to table (at the Applicant’s request) to the September 9, 2015 meeting to allow the Applicant to provide a revised plan. The revised plan must be received by Land & Resource no later than August 19, 2015. Michael Lloyd, Steven Lind & Todd Axtman represented the Application. Steven Olmsted indicated the new driveway is an improvement and spoke in favor of that proposal. Steve Christianson spoke in favor of the driveway proposal. Motion: A motion by Trites, second by Boyer to approve the revised plan dated August 18, 2015, as presented, allowing the rock retaining wall to be constructed this fall provided it is completed by November 1,2015. Voting: All Members in favor. Eugene & Michelle Erpelding - Approved With Conditions: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Landscape lake side with retaining walls, plants and shrubs. Includes a 12' x 28' patio with fire pit and 5 retaining walls totaling 182'. Approximately 277 cubic yards. The project is located in Lake View Beach Addition NW 12’ of Lot 14 & ail of 15 & 16 and Lake View Beach Addition Res Lot B of BIk 1 & NW 12’ of Res C, Section 11 of Scambler Township; Pelican Lake (56-786), GD. Motion July 8, 2015: A motion by Bailey, second by Schwartz to table (at the Applicant’s request) to August 12, 2015, allowing the applicant time to provide a soil analysis from a Soils Engineer. Material must be submitted to Land & Resource no later than July 22, 2015. Motion - August 12, 2015: A motion by Boyer, second by Wilson to table to September 9, 2015 at the Applicant’s request per letter received at Land & Resource Management on July 21,2015. Eugene Erpelding represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Wilson, second by Frazier to approve provided; 1. The Applicant follows the soils recommendations in the report from Northern Technologies Inc. 2. An engineer is onsite to oversee this project. 3. A more permeable patio is installed in the fire pit area. This project will assist in stabilizing the area. Voting: AH Members in favor. Marsha Bowman Gene Erpelding <Gene.Erpelding@alliedag.com> Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:04 AM Marsha Bowman Bill Kalar RE: Conditional Use Permit Application; Pelican Lake (56-786); September 9, 2015 Planning Commissino Meeting From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Thank you! Gene Erpelding Chief Executive Officer Allied Energy, Inc. dba Allied Grain Allied Agronomy, LLC 109 Industrial Park Edgeley, ND 58433 e-mail: gene.erpelding(5)alliedae.com Phone: 701-830-0115 Visit us at: http://www.alliedag.com/ From: Marsha Bowman [mailto:MBowman(S)co.ottertail.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:02 AM To: Gene Erpelding <Gene.Erpelding(5)alliedag.com> Cc: Bill Kalar <bkalar(Sco.ottertail.mn.us> Subject: Conditional Use Permit Application; Pelican Lake (56-786); September 9, 2015 Planning Commissino Meeting Gene Erpelding, I am I receipt of your letter from Beyond Outdoors and Soil Boring Report completed by Northern Technologies, Inc. that addresses your Conditional Use Permit Application for property on Pelican Lake (56-786). I have made copies of this information and will fonward it to the Planning Commission for their consideration at the September 9, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me. Marsha Mcu^iho/BowmcMv Office'AdmCniitrator Lccnd/£r KeiOurc^ h^<M\u^e*nerct QSC, 5^0W fir fergui'faUy.MN 56537 Z18-998-8099 ^ijfj ■ aiaaiioiaTflK From: Gene Erpelding rmailto:Gene.Erpeldina(S)alliedaa.com1 Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 12:04 PM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Conditional Use Permit Application; Pelican Lake (56-786) ... c 1 The boring report supports the retaining walls as presented in the July 9*'’ planning commission meeting. Beyond Outdoors will place subbase material and drainage as outlined in the soils report. Please consider my request for the next meeting. V Thank you, .ii Gene Erpelding POBoxSS Edgeley, ND 58433 7dl-830-0il5 ) This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and is intended to be received only by persons 'entitled to receive such information. If yon have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Please delete it and all attachments'from any servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail by you is strictly prohibited. All e-mails and anachanents sent arid received are subject to monitoring, reading, and archival by Allied .Agronomy LLC, including' ■■ its subsidiaries. The recipient of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of "Viruses” or other "Malware". 'Allied Agronomy LLC, along with its subsidiaries, accepts no liability for any damage) caused by any such code transmuted by or ■ ■ '■ '■ accompanying this e-mail or any attachment. '. • This e-mail message may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive such information. If you have received this e-mail in error, plea.se notify the sender immediately. Please delete 'it and all atiachmems from any servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of fins e-mail by you is strictly prohibited.. ■'AH'‘e-mails, and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, reading and archival by Allied Agrono.my LLC, including iis subsidiaries. The recipient of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking for the presence of "Viruses" or other "Malware". .4 'ilied Agronoiny LLC. along with its:subsidiaries, accepts no Uahility for any damage caused by any such code transmitted by or ' '■ " accompanying this e-mail or any attachment. : . .-f,. f t. f- A' ; 2 received AUG 1 8 2015 LAND 8c resourcemBeyond Outdoorsikrfi August 17, 2015 Gene Erpelding 50512 Co Rd 9 Pelican Rapids, MN RE: Soil Boring Report Dear Mr. Erpelding, After review of the soil boring report compiled by Northern Technologies Inc., Beyond Outdoors agrees that all work done at 50512 Co Rd 9, Pelican Rapids MN, will be completed as referenced In the soil boring report. Sincerely, Amanda Ahrenholz Lead Designer & Estimator amanda@beyodcond.com 701-491-5226 Enclosure - Soil Boring Report (NTI) MED Consult! Design I Build 5518 51"* Ave S j Fargo, ND p. 701.298.0468 j f. 701.356.5640 contact@beyondcond.com ^^CEA/E£> AU6 18 2015 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 ■’f NTI 3522 4th Avenue South Fargo, NO 58103 P:701.232.1822 F;701.232.1864 www.NTlgeo.com Unearthing confidence™ NORTHERNTECHNOLOCIES.INC. August 10, 2015 Gene Erpelding 50512 Cty Hwy 9 Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 Mr. Gene ErpeldingAttn: Subject: Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Review Proposed Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 In accordance with your request and subsequent July 21, 2015 authorization. Northern Technologies, Inc. (NTI) conducted a Geotechnical Exploration for the above referenced project. Our services included advancement of exploration borings and preparation of an engineering report with recommendations developed from our geotechnical services. Our work was performed in general accordance with our proposal of July 21, 2015. Soil samples obtained at the site will be held for 60 days at which time they will be discarded. Please advise us in writing if you wish to have us retain them for a longer period. You will be assessed an additional fee if soil samples are retained beyond 60 days. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service on this project. If there are any questions regarding the soils explored or our review and recommendations, please contact us at your convenience at (701) 232-1822. Northern Technologies, Inc. Josh Holmes, P.E. (ND) Project Engineer CLsJ Dan Gibson, P.E. (ND, MN) Senior Engineer Beyond Outdoors - Amanda Ahrenholzcc: Precision ■ Expertise • Geotechnical Materials FARGO ■ BISMARCK ■ GRAND FORKS • MINOT ■ M E N D 0 TA H EIG H TS • RASlSEY • ST. CLOUD cr^1^ GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 TABLE OF CONTENTS GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 Contents Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................ 2.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................... 2.1 Site / Project Description........................................ 2.2 Scope of Services..................................................... 3.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS.............................. 3.1 Exploration Scope.................................................... 3.2 Surface Conditions.................................................. 3.3 Subsurface Conditions............................................. 3.4 Ground Water Conditions....................................... 3.5 Laboratory Test Program........................................ 4.0 ENGINEERING REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS...... 4.1 Project Scope........................................................... 4.2 Site Preparation....................................................... 4.3 Foundations............................................................. 4.4 Bearing Factor of Safety and Estimate of Settlement 4.5 Backfill & Drainage.................................................. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS.............................. 5.1 Excavation Stability................................................. 5.2 Engineered Fill & Winter Construction.................... 5.3 Operation of Project Sumps..................................... 6.0 CLOSURE..................................................................... 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 APPENDICES Appendix A - Geotechnical Evaluation of Recovered Soil Samples, Field Exploration Procedures, General Notes, Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, Excavation Oversize Diagram Appendix B - Ground Water Issues, Geotextile Fabric, Placement and Compaction of Engineered Fill, Swelling of Clay Soils, Project Sumps Appendix C - Site Diagram, Boring Logs GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING REVIEW Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We briefly summarize below our geotechnical recommendations for the proposed project. The summary must be read in complete context with our report. This report is limited to evaluation of bearing capacity, settlement, and lateral earth pressures of retained soils; and recommendations for drainage and site preparation. The retaining wall is being designed and installed by Beyond Outdoors or other sub consultants. NTI is not responsible for the design of the retaining wall, or evaluation of the retaining wall design. It is our understanding the project will include Rosetta and Outcropping stone walls to retain the soils that provide support for the existing house and deck, as well as proposed patio and seating areas. The retaining wall designer has not provided detail information on the walls, but we assume the walls will provide a gravity retaining system that does not include tie backs or grid. Retaining walls should be constructed on competent, non-organic natural soil(s) or engineered fill, as recommended within our report. Retaining wall footings may be proportioned using the maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures of 3,000 psf. The actual size of the foundations must be designed to resist sliding and overturning forces. The retaining wall designer is responsible for sizing of the foundations. Our exploration indicates topsoil extends to approximately 1 foot at project. Due to the steep slope of the lakeside hill, we could not perform borings on the slope. We estimate similar but variable depth of topsoil along the hill slope. We recommend additional evaluation during site stripping and excavation to confirm removal of unsuitable soils from below project construction. Measurable ground water could not be determined during drilling operations due to the use of mud rotary drilling techniques. Select samples obtained where moist to wet. We anticipate groundwater will be encountered approximately 24 feet below the top of the slope or near the current lake elevation. Overall, the site soils are conducive to movement of ground water both laterally and vertically. The moisture content of such soils can vary annually and per recent precipitation. Such soils and other regional dependent conditions may produce ground water entry of project excavations. We direct your attention to other report sections and appendices concerning ground water issues and subsurface drainage. Page 1 SCAiii^tO Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Site / Project Description The proposed Retaining Walls are to be constructed for the house located on the northwest side of Pelican Lake at 50512 County Highway 9 in Rural Pelican Rapids. The existing site contains steep lakeside slope with two existing retaining walls providing support for the existing house and decks. The existing retaining walls show signs of distress and rotation near surface. It is our understanding that the existing retaining walls are to remain in place to provide lateral support during construction. 2.2 Scope of Services The purpose of this report is to present a summary of our geotechnical exploration and provide generalized opinions and recommendations regarding the soil conditions and design parameters for founding of the project. Our "scope of services" was limited to the following: 1. Explore the project subsurface by means of one (1) standard penetration boring extending to maximum depth of 51 feet, and conduct laboratory tests on representative samples to characterize the engineering and index properties of the soils. 2. Prepare a report presenting our findings from our field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering recommendations for footing depths, allowable bearing capacity, estimated settlements, excavation, engineered fill, backfill, compaction and potential construction difficulties related to excavation, backfilling and drainage. 3.0 EXPLORATION PROGRAM RESULTS 3.1 Exploration Scope Site geotechnical drilling occurred on July 22, 2015 with individual borings advanced at the approximate location presented on the diagram within the appendices. NTI located the borings relative to existing site features, and determined the approximate elevation of the borings relative to the temporary benchmark (TBM), the finished floor slab of the existing house. The elevation of the TBM, as assigned by NTI, is 100.0 feet. We obtained elevation data from the top of the existing retaining walls to estimate the existing and finished footing elevations. 3.2 Surface Conditions The area to the north and east of the existing house is relatively level with grass cover. The site topography slopes dramatically downward towards the lake on the south side of the house. Surface drainage appears to flow south towards Pelican Lake. The elevation change between the boring and the lake surface was not measured, but is estimated to be on the order of 25 feet. Page 2 Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 3.3 Subsurface Conditions Please refer to the boring logs within the appendices for a detailed description and depths of stratum at each boring. The boreholes were backfilled abandoned using high solids bentonite or neat cement grout per state statute. Minor settlement of infill soil will occur with Owner responsible for final closure of the boreholes. The general geologic origin of retained soil samples is listed on the boring logs. The upper portion of the soil profile for each boring was sampled using auger flights and is approximate. The overall subsurface soil profile at the borings consists of approximately 1 foot of topsoil underlain by loose to very dense Outwash soils which extend to the termination depth of the borings (maximum 51 feet). The Outwash soils are comprised of sand, silty sand, sandy silt, and gravel with varying grain size, color, and unit weight. Additional comment on the evaluation of recovered soil samples is presented within the report appendices. 3.4 Ground Water Conditions The drill crew observed the borings for ground water and noted cave-in depth of borings, if any, during and at the completion of drilling activities. These observations and measurements are noted on the boring logs. Measurable ground water could not be determined during drilling operations due to the use of mud rotary drilling techniques. Select samples obtained where moist to wet. We anticipate groundwater wiil be encountered approximately 24 feet below the top of the slope or near the current lake elevation. Overall, the site soils are conducive to movement of ground water both laterally and vertically. The moisture content of such soils can vary annually and per recent precipitation. Such soils and other regional dependent conditions may produce ground water entry of project excavations. We direct your attention to other report sections and appendices concerning ground water issues and subsurface drainage. 3.5 Laboratory Test Program Our analysis and recommendations of this report are based upon our interpretation of the standard penetration resistance determined while sampling soils, hand penetrometer test results obtained during classification of retained soils, and experience with similar soils from other sites near the project. The results of such tests are summarized on the boring logs or attached test forms. Page 3 SCANNED Erpelding Retaining Wail Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 4.0 ENGINEERING REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on our present knowledge of the project. We ask that you or your design team notify us immediately if significant changes are made in project size, location or design as we would need to review our current recommendations and provide modified or different recommendations with respect to such change(s). 4.1 Project Scope We understand the project will include the construction of Rosetta and Outcropping retaining walls. The retaining walls will allow for excavation of the slope for landscaping modifications to the property which includes a patio and grass covered seating area near the lake shore rip rap. NTI has not been provided detailed information about the wall. Our assessment of settlement is estimated based on knowledge from projects using similar materials. We understand the project will include excavation of the existing slope to construct the retaining walls and establish the elevation of the patio and grass seating area. It is our understanding that the existing retaining walls will remain in place to provide support of the existing structures during construction. A slope stability analysis of the existing bank, construction excavations, and finished retaining wall system is not within the scope of this exploration, and therefore has not been provided. NTI recommends the retaining wall designer and contractor assess the stability of the slopes and the existing retaining walls during excavations. Our assessment of project soils, opinions, and report recommendations are based directly on application of estimated structural loads to site soils. 4.2 Site Preparation Project construction, as proposed, will involve removal of site soils to establish the base elevation for the proposal retaining walls. We recommend removal of all topsoil and/or any unsuitable material(s) encountered during advancement of project excavations. Our field exploration indicates removal of topsoil should result in excavations extending approximately 1 foot below existing grade. Additional excavation will be necessary to achieve frost protection of footing construction. We recommend that you oversize all earthwork improvements and excavations where fill materials are placed below foundations. The minimum excavation oversize should extend per the requirements outlined on the diagram within the report appendices. You should pump seepage from excavations continuously until the Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative determines such seepage no longer impacts the bearing soils, engineered fill system, backfill system or soils and concrete placement. The Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative should review project excavations to verify removal of unsuitable material(s) and adequate bearing support of exposed soils. All such observations should occur prior to the placement of engineering fill, or construction of footings and floor slabs. Page 4 Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 Where granular soils are present, we recommend that native soils within 12 inches of exposed grade (i.e. base of excavations) be compacted with a large vibratory roller until such materials achieve no less than 98% of the standard proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: D 698-96). However, where cohesive soils (silt and clay) are present at the base of excavations, you should not begin or implement this compactive effort without direct review and approval by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative. While not mandatory, excessive disturbance of existing native soils and/or localized zones with weak soils may require placement of a geotextile separation fabric for stabilization of construction (engineered fill, footing and/or floor slab construction). The Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative should determine the need for geotextile placement after observation of completed excavations. Comment and recommendations for materials and placement of geotextile are presented within the appendices. In our opinion, the non-organic sand and silty sand on-site may be re-used as engineered fill beneath the retaining waiis when such soiis are conditioned and placed as presented within this report. Any imported fill required for beneath the retaining walls should consist of "pit run" sand or "sand & gravel". Such imported fill should have 100 percent material passing the 1 'A inch sieve opening, no more than 40 percent materials passing the No. 40 U.S. Sieve opening, and no more than 10 percent material passing the No. 200 U.S. Sieve opening. All engineered fill for site corrective earthwork and for support of project footings should be tempered for moisture content and compacted to no less than 98 percent of the standard proctor maximum dry density. Engineered fill should be placed and compacted in lifts not exceeding 12 inches. 4.3 Foundations The following bearing recommendations are based on our basic understanding of the project. You should notify us of any changes made to the project size, location, design, or site grades so we can assess how such changes impact our recommendations. We assume retaining walls will not deviate from the Rosetta and Outcropping walls previously noted within this report. In our opinion, you may support the proposed Retaining Wall by founding strip footings on competent, non-organic native soils, or engineered fill, providing such construction complies with the criteria established within this report. You may design footings using a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. The actual size of the foundations must be designed to resist sliding and overturning forces. The retaining wall designer is responsible for sizing of the foundations. Construction should extend retaining wall footings to sufficient depth below ground surface as protection against frost action. For this project, you should extend retaining wall footing construction to a minimum of 7 feet below the exterior ground surface to protect against frost effects. Page 5 Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 Retaining walls with unbalanced earthen fill will experience lateral loading from retained soils. You may model this lateral loading as an equivalent earth pressure applied to the retaining wall providing site geometric and related conditions complies with the parameters supporting such modeling. We recommend use of the Table 3 "at-rest" equivalent fluid earth pressures for establishing lateral loading of retaining walls. Table 3: Retained Soil - Equivalent Fluid Weight / Coefficient of Friction "Active" Condition (pcf) "At Rest" Condition (pcf) "Passive" Condition (pcf) Soil TypeParameter Sand (SP, SP-SM)Unit Weight of Equivalent Fluid ^ 65 30045 Sandy Silt (ML)95 80 130 Coefficient of Friction Sand (SP, SP-SM)Friction Factor for Establishing Footing Sliding Resistance ^ 0.550 Sandy Silt (ML)0.350 1 The recommendations for equivalent fluid weight are based solely on assumed conditions with respect to sloping ground and/or surcharge loads. Design professional is cautioned that actual loads imparted to the structure will be dependent on soil conditions, site geometric considerations and surcharge loads imparted to the structure. 2 The determination of resistance to sliding determined based on multiplication of the respective coefficient of friction by the effective vertical stress occurring at the elevation of interest. 4.4 Bearing Factor of Safety and Estimate of Settlement We estimate native soils provide a nominal 3 factor of safety against localized bearing failure when construction complies with report criteria and recommendations, and you design structure footings using a maximum net allowable soil bearing capacity of 3,000psf. We also estimate that footings designed with the maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure recommendations and loaded per report assumptions may experience long term, total settlement of approximately Vz to 1 inch with the upper estimate more probable. Likewise, project footings may experience differential settlement on the order of 25 to 50 percent of total settlement with greatest movement occurring between adjacent footings of greatest load variation. Furthermore, total and differential movement of footings and floor slabs could be significantly greater than the above estimates if you support construction on frozen soils, the moisture content of the bearing soils significantly changes from insitu conditions, and snow or ice lenses are incorporated into site earthwork. Page 6 Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 4.5 Backfill & Drainage You should install subsurface drainage at the base of retaining walls to limit moisture accumulation within granular backfill behind the wall. Accumulation of moisture within soils results in increased lateral earth pressures against the wall. You should also consider placement drain tile at mid-height of the wall within the backslope of the excavation. As a general guideline, such drainage consists of a geotextile and coarse drainage encased slotted or perforated pipe extending to sump basin(s). The retaining wall designer is responsible for the location and amount of subsurface drainage needed. Backfill for retaining walls should consist of a native, coarse alluvium or "pit run" granular soil with a fine content equal to or less than 12 percent passing the No. 200 US Sieve opening (i.e. fill extending to within 2 feet of final grade). The final one and one half to two feet of exterior backfill within lawn areas should consist of topsoil. You should temper all backfill for correct moisture content and then place and compact individual lifts of exterior backfill per criteria presented within the report appendices. Placement of backfill against retaining should be performed concurrent on both sides to minimize any unplanned differential loading, rotation and/or movement of the wall system. You should maintain positive drainage during and after construction of project and eliminate ponding of water on site soils. We recommend you include provisions within construction documents for positive drainage of site. You should install sumps at critical areas around project to assist in removal of seepage and runoff from site. We present recommendations for sump construction within the appendices. 5.0 CONSTRUaiON CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation Stability Excavation depth and sidewall inclination should not exceed those specified in local, state or federal regulations. Excavations may need to be widened and sloped, or temporarily braced, to maintain or develop a safe work environment. Also, contractors should comply with local, state, and federal safety regulations including current OSHA excavation and trench safety standards. Temporary shoring must be designed in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. Page 7 Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 5.2 Engineered Fill & Winter Construction The Geotechnical Engineer of Record or their designated representative should observe and evaluate excavations to verify removal of uncontrolled fills, topsoil and/or unsuitable material(s), and adequacy of bearing support of exposed soils. Such observation should occur prior to construction of foundations or placement of engineered fill supporting excavations. Engineered fill should be evaluated by above designated representative for moisture content, mechanical analysis and/or Atterberg limits prior to placement. You should temper engineered fill for correct moisture content and then place and compact individual lifts of engineered fill to criteria established within the appendices. Frozen soil should never be used as engineered fill or backfill nor should you support foundations on frozen soils. Moisture freezing within the soil matrix of fine grained and/or cohesive soils produces ice lenses. Such soils gain moisture from capillary action and, with continued growth, heave with formation of ice lenses within the soil matrix. Foundations constructed on frozen soils settle at or after thaw of ice lenses. You should protect excavations and foundations from freezing conditions or accumulation of snow, and remove frozen soils, snow, and ice from within excavations, fill section or from below proposed foundations. Replacement soils should consist of similar materials as those removed from the excavation with moisture content, placement and compaction conforming to report criteria. 5.3 Operation of Project Sumps We previously noted the importance of removal of seepage and runoff from project excavations. You should install and continuously operate sumps, temporary subsurface drainage pipe, and/or collection manifold and vacuum wells for removal of seepage and runoff from project. We present recommendations for project sumps within the appendices. Page 8 f£)Erpelding Retaining Wall Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota NTI Project No. 15-13134.100 6.0 CLOSURE Our conclusions and recommendations are predicated on observation and testing of the earthwork directed by Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Our opinions are based on data assumed representative of the site. However, the area coverage of borings in relation to the entire project is very small. For this and other reasons, we do not warrant conditions below the depth of our borings, or that the strata logged from our borings are necessarily typical of the site. Deviations from our recommendations by plans, written specifications, or field applications shall relieve us of responsibility unless our written concurrence with such deviations has been established. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gene Erpelding for specific application to the proposed Erpelding Retaining Wall in Rural Pelican Rapids, Minnesota. Northern Technologies, Inc. has endeavored to comply with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice common to the local area. Northern Technologies, Inc. makes no other warranty, expressed or implied. Northern Technologies, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Josh Holmes, P.E. (ND) Project Engineer Daniel T. Gibson, P.E. Dan Gibson, P.E. (ND, MN) Senior Engineer Date: 8/10/15 Reg. No. 48076 JH:dg Attachments F:\PROJECTS\Geo\GEOREP 2015\Erpelding Retaining Wali - Peiican Rapids, MN\Erpelding Retaining Wall.docx smmPage 9 APPENDIX A SCANNED M GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF RECOVERED SOIL SAMPLES We visually examined recovered soil samples to estimate distribution of grain sizes, plasticity, consistency, moisture condition, color, presence of lenses and seams, and apparent geologic origin. We then classified the soils according to the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2488). A chart describing this classification system and general notes explaining soil sampling procedures are presented within appendices attachments. The stratification depth lines between soil types on the logs are estimated based on the available data. Insitu, the transition between type(s) may be distinct or gradual in either the horizontal or vertical directions. The soil conditions have been established at our specific boring locations only. Variations in the soil stratigraphy may occur between and around the borings, with the nature and extent of such change not readily evident until exposed by excavation. These variations must be properly assessed when utilizing information presented on the boring logs. We request that you, your design team or contractors contact NTI immediately if local conditions differ from those assumed by this report, as we would need to review how such changes impact our recommendations. Such contact would also allow us to revise our recommendations as necessary to account for the changed site conditions. FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES Soil Sampling - Standard Penetration Boring: Soil sampling was performed according to the procedures described by ASTM D-1586. Using this procedure, a 2 inch O.D. split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 pound weight falling 30 inches. After an initial set of six inches, the number of blows required to drive the sampler an additional 12 inches is recorded (known as the penetration resistance (i.e. "N-value") of the soil at the point of sampling. The N-value is an index of the relative density of cohesionless soils and an approximation of the consistency of cohesive soils. Soil Sampling - Power Auger Boring: The boring(s) was/were advanced with a 6 inch nominal diameter continuous flight auger. As a result, samples recovered from the boring are disturbed, and our determination of the depth, extend of various stratum and layers, and relative density or consistency of the soils is approximate. Soil Classification: Soil samples were visually and manually classified in general conformance with ASTM D-2488 as they were removed from the sampler(s). Representative fractions of soil samples were then sealed within respective containers and returned to the laboratory for further examination and verification of the field classification. In addition, select samples were submitted for laboratory tests. Individual sample information, identification of sampling methods, method of advancement of the samples and other pertinent information concerning the soil samples are presented on boring logs and related report attachments. sen General Notes DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS DEFINITION LABORATORY TEST SYMBOLS DEFINITIONSYMBOLSYMBOL Moisture content-percent of dry weight Dry Density-pounds per cubic foot Liquid and plastic limits determined in accordance with ASTM D 423 and D 424 Unconfmed compressive strength-pounds per square foot in accordance with ASTM D 2166- Continuous Sampling 2-3/8" Pipe Drill Cleanout Tube WC.S. DP.D. LL, PLC.O. 3 'A" I.D. Hollow Stem Auger Qu3 HSA 66 4" Diameter Flight Auger 6" Diameter Flight Auger 2 Yi" Casing 4" Casing Drilling Mud Jet Water Hand Auger Size NX Casing Size BX Casing Size AX casing 2" O.D. Split Spoon Sample 2" Thin Wall Tube Sample 3" Thin Wall Tube Sample 4 FA 6 FA lYiC Additional insertions in Qu Column Penetrometer reading-tons/square foot Torvane reading-tons/square foot Specific Gravity - ASTM D 854-58 Shrinkage limit-ASTM 427-61 Hydrogen ion content-meter method Organic content-combustion method Grain size analysis One dimensional consolidation Triaxial Compression * See attached data Sheet and/or graph 4C PqD.M. SJ.W. GH.A. SLNXC pHBXC 0AXC M.A.SS C*2T Qc'3T Water Level Symbol Water levels shown on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the time and under the conditions indicated. In sand, the indicated levels can be considered reliable ground water levels. In clay soils, it is not possible to determine the ground water level within the normal scope of a test boring investigation, except where lenses or layers of more pervious water bearing soil is present and then a long period of time may be necessary to reach equilibrium. Therefore, the position of the water level symbol for cohesive or mixed soils may not indicate the true level of the ground water table. The available water level information is given at the bottom of the log sheet. Descriptive Terminology CONSISTENCYDENSITY "N" VALUE "N" VALUETERMTERM Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense Standard “N" Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon. Soft0-4 0-4 Medium Rather Stiff 5-8 5-8 9-15 16-30 Over 30 9-15 16-30 Over 30 Stiff Very Stiff Particle SizesRelative Proportions RANGE Boulders Gravel - Coarse Medium Sand - Coarse Medium Fine Silt and Clay Note: Sieve sizes are U.S. Standard. Over 3"TERMS Trace A little Some With - 3" #4 - 0-5% 5-15% 15-30% 30-50% #4 - #10 #10 - #40 #40 - #200 Determined by plasticity characteristics. Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes ASTM Designation D-2487 and D 2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) Group Symbols Typical NamesMajor Divisions Classification Criteria Well -graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines. Cu = Dgo / Dio Q = (D30) /(DioxDfio) greater than 4. between 1 & 3. GW§re■5 re Poorly graded gravels and gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines. IojGP Not meeting both criteria for GW materials.OI .s.S u28 ^ ° iOJ ^O § bi S .g Atterberg limits below "A" line, or P.l. less than 4. Silty gravels, gravel-sand- silt mixtures. 5 u E Atterberg limits plotting In hatched area are borderline classifications requiring use of dual symbols. GM y IIi3E H ° ,EIII t/1 V Atterberg limits above "A" line with P.l. greater than 7. Cu = Deo / Djo greater thane. C. = (Dao)^ / (Dio X Dgo) between 1 & 3. 2 c O E Clayey gravels, gravel- sand-clay mixtures. GC ■S'■% Jj IDS5 S - <v^ 51 =5 8 i ? .r ■O op 5 §1 iis=o c 2 S .S S!x: nil o (N Well-graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines. s i s§sw6z% I/) re§ Poorly-graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines. 0)tA %■S SP Not meeting both criteria for SW materials.reSoI -5 Si •S m5 c to ^ I °5 5 ■S Vg .s O lA li I ? S C o V'5 5 a Atterberg limits below "A" line, or P.l. less than 4. Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures.Atterberg limits plotting in hatched area are borderline classifications requiring use of dual symbols. SM is Atterberg limits above "A" line with P.l. greater than 7. Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures.SCre (✓) u- Inorganic silts, very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands. tA<A ML o Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. s 5 CL .1 § -D 5i -I] Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity. OL Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silts, elastic silts. MH >£ O rg re Inorganic days of high plasticity, fat clays.CHI “ = I■§ E O T3a5 E S dz \A<u(A•A Organic clays of medium to high plasticity.OH5 a 5 s? ? S I: a: 5 .a Peat, muck and other highly organic soils.~ S» llS O 5 Pt SCANNED Excavation Oversize Excavation oversize facilitates distribution of load induced stress within supporting soils. Unless otherwise superseded by report specific requirements, all construction should conform to the minimum oversize and horizontal offset requirements as presented within the diagram and associated chart. Excavation Backslope (Refer to Notel) Horizontal Offset A (Refer to Chart) Backfill Surface & Soils, Refer to report for specific material type and placement Oversize Ratio H (Refer to Chart) Structure and/or Basement Unsuitable Soils (i.e. Excavated Materials), Refer to Chart and report for requirements. Depth D: Engineered Fill, Refer to report for^------material type and placement criteria. Competent Soils (i.e. acceptable for support of embankment and structure), Refer to report for specific requirements. Definitions Oversize Ratio H: The ratio of the horizontal distance divided by the engineered fill depth (i.e. # Horizontal / Depth D). Refer to Chart for specific requirements. Horizontal Offset A: The horizontal distance between the outside edge of footing or critical position and the crest of the engineered fill section. Refer to Chart for specific requirements. Note 1: Excavation depth and sidewall inclination should not exceed those specified in local, state or federal regulations including those defined by Subpart P of Chapter 27, 29 CFR Part 1926 (of Federal Register). Excavations may need to be widened and sloped, or temporarily braced, to maintain or develop a safe work environment. Horizontal Offset AUnsuitable Soil Type Oversize Ratio HCondition SP, SM soils, CL & CH soils with cohesion greater than 1,000 psf 2 feet or width of footing, whichever is greater Equal to or greater than Depth D Foundation Unit Load equal to or less than 3,000 psf. SP, SM soils, CL & CH soils with cohesion less than 1,000 psf 5 feet or width of footing, whichever is greater Equal to or greater than Depth D Foundation Unit Load greater than 3,000 psf 2 feet or width of footing, whichever is greater Foundation Unit Load equal Topsoil or Peat to or less than 3,000 psf. Equal to or greater than two (2) time Depth D 5 feet or width of footing, whichever is greater Topsoil or Peat Equal to or greater than two (2) time Depth D Foundation Unit Load greater than 3,000 psf APPENDIX B GROUND WATER ISSUES The following presents additional comment and soil specific issues related to measurement of ground water conditions at your project site. Note that our ground water measurements, or lack thereof, will vary depending on the time allowed for equilibrium to occur in the borings. Extended observation time was not available during the scope of the field exploration program and, therefore, ground water measurements as noted on the borings logs may or may not accurately reflect actual conditions at your site. Seasonal and yearly fluctuations of the ground water level, if any, occur. Perched ground water may be present within sand and silt lenses bedded within cohesive soil formations. Groundwater typically exists at depth within cohesive and cohesionless soils. Documentation of the local ground water surface and any perched ground water conditions at the project site would require installation of temporary piezometers and extended monitoring due to the relatively low permeability exhibited by the site soils. We have not performed such ground water evaluation due to the scope of services authorized for this project. We anticipate pumps installed within temporary sumps should control subsurface seepage from perched conditions. However, we caution such seepage from such formations and any water entry from excavations below the ground water table may be heavy and will vary based on seasonal and annual precipitation, and ground related impacts in the vicinity of the project. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC We occasionally recommend installation of a geotextile separation fabric between the native soils and the engineered fill section below project foundations, floors and/or between the clay subgrade and aggregate base of pavement construction within the body of the report. If recommended within the body of the report, it is our opinion this geotextile should consist of a non-woven, needle punched, fabric with a minimum grab tensile strength in both directions equal to or greater than 200 lbs minimum average roll value (MARV, ASTM D 4632). We recommend that the geotextile panels be oriented parallel with proposed aggregate placement activities, and occur in such a manner that the overall number of individual panels are kept to a minimum. As placed, individual panels of geotextile should have a width equal to or greater than 12 feet. We recommend that the Contractor overlap longitudinal and butt seams of adjacent panels a minimum of 18 inches with such joints oriented to follow initial construction traffic (shingles profile with traffic). PLACEMENT and COMPACTION OF ENGINEERED FILL Unless otherwise superseded within the body of the Geotechnical Exploration Report, the following criteria shall be utilized for placement of engineered fill on project. This includes, but is not limited to earthen fill placement to improve site grades, fill placed below structural footings, fiii placed interior of structure, and fiii placed as backfill of foundations. Engineered fill placed for construction, if necessary should consist of natural, non-organic, competent soils native to the project area. Such soils may include, but are not limited to gravel, sand, or clays with Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2488) classifications of GW, SP, SM, CL or CH. Use of silt or clayey silt as project fill will require additional review and approval of project Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Such soils have USCS classifications of ML, MH, ML-CL, MH-CH. Use of topsoil, marl, peat, other organic soils construction debris and/or other unsuitable materials as fill is not allowed. Such soils have USCS classifications of OL, OH, Pt. Engineered fill, classified as clay, should be tempered such that the moisture content at the time of placement is equal to and no more than 3 percent above the optimum content for as defined by the appropriate proctor test. Likewise, engineered fill classified as gravel or sand should be tempered such that the moisture content at the time of placement is within 3 percent of the optimum content. All engineered fill for construction should be placed in individual 8 inch maximum depth lifts. Each lift of fill should be compacted by large vibratory equipment until the in-place soil density is equal to or greater than the criteria established within the following tabulation. Compaction Criteria (% respective Proctor) ^ Sand or GravelClayType of Construction General Embankment Fill Engineered Fill below Foundations Engineered Fill below Floor Slabs Engineered Fill placed against Foundation Walls Engineered Fill placed as Pavement Subgrade Engineered Fill placed as Pavement Aggregate Base Engineered Fill placed within Utility Trench (to within 3 feet of pavement aggregate base or final grade Engineered Fill placed as Utility Trench Fill (within 3 feet of pavement aggregate base or final grade 95 to 100 Min. 95 Min. 95 Min. 98 95 to 98 Min. 95 95 to 98 95 to 100 Min. 95 Min. 95 Min. 98NA Min. 95 Min. 95 Min. 98 Min. 98 Note 1 Unless otherwise required, compaction criteria shall be based on the Standard Proctor Test (ASTM D698). Density tests should be taken during engineered fill placement to document earthwork has achieved necessary compaction of the material(s). Recommendations for interior fill placement and backfill of foundation walls are presented within other sections of this report. SWELLING of CLAY SOILS Swell of clay soil occurs when moderate to highly desiccated, "over consolidated", moderate to highly plastic clay absorbs moisture concurrent within removal of overburden pressure. The fat clay soils comprising the Glacial Lake Agassiz formation are generally know as to have "moderate" to "high risk" of swelling when conditions favorable for heave occur. Clay minerals are generally elongated bipolar charged particles aligned in plate like structures. Absorption of water by the clay minerals is driven, in part, by the electrical attraction between the bipolar mineral and the electrical charged water molecule. The electrical attraction at the molecular level is a fairly strong bond which forces separation of the clay particle into a stratified system of bonded clay and water. The resulting composite system has greatly increased volume as compared to the original clay minerals. Major clay minerals include Kaolinite, Holloysite, lllite. Calcium Montmorillonite, Sodium Montmorillonite, and Sodium Hectorite. Mielenz and King (1955) have noted that absorption of water by clays leads to expansion or swelling and that the magnitude of swelling varied widely depending upon the type and quantity of clay mineral present, their exchangeable ions, electrolyte content of the aqueous phase, particle-size distribution, void size and distribution, the internal structure, water content, superimposed load, and possibly other factors. Research geology professor Mr. Ralph Grim [University of Illinois] collaborates free swelling of clay minerals varied widely [referenced Table 5-10). Table 5-10 Free Swelling Data for Clay Minerals (in per cent) (After Mielenz and King, 1955) ^ Calcium Montmorillonite: Forest, Mississippi Wilson Creek Dam, Colorado Davis Dam, Arizona Osage, Wyoming (prepared from Na-Mont.) 145 95 45-85 125 Sodium Montmorillonite - Osage, Wyoming Sodium Hectorite - Hector, California 1,400 -1,600 1,600 - 2,000 lllite: Fithian, Illinois Morris, Illinois Tazewell, Virginia 115 -120 60 15 Kaolinite: Mesa Alta, New Mexico Macon, Georgia Langley, North Carolina Halloysite - Santa Rita, New Mexico 5 60 20 70 1 Ralph E. Grim, Table 5-10, Free Swelling Data for Clay Minerals, "Applied Clay Mineralogy"JUiwersity of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, McGraw -Hill Book Company, Inc., 1962, p 248. A Mlim^ bLAiulcU As shown in referenced Table 5-10, the effective range of swell in percent varies widely from as little as 5% with Kaolinite to 2,000% with Sodium Hectorite. Of major concern, regional clay soils typically include varying concentration of montmorillonite mineral [commonly defined as smectite]. Note that defining the percent content and mineral type of clay soils calls for very costly and time intensive laboratory analysis. Such determination cannot be made through visual classification. Historically, a majority of clay soils across the Red River Valley (i.e. Sherack Deposition of Glacial Lake Agassiz Formation) have extreme low permeability on the order of 1 x 10 ® or lower cm/sec. However, this low permeability for water flow is moderated by silt and very fine sand lens bedded within the Sherack formation. Such lenses becomes wet to saturated allowing movement of ground water during periods of prolonged wet cycles [nominal 10 to 50 year cycles], allowing limited transport of aqueous minerals through the Sherack clays. This can lead to varied extent of sodium and calcium mineral exchange within the clay soil structure [through presence of gypsum]. Past observation of other projects in south Fargo suggest the most prevalent risk of heave occurs when new, lightly loaded construction occurs over a prior shelter belt [previously forested with mature cotton wood or oaks], or farm fields previously planted in alfalfa or similar deep rooting plants. Clay soils within nominal 10 to 30 feet of ground surface at such locations typically are desiccated to varying degree from moisture uptake by plant cover. Outside of above anomalies [excluding areas desiccated during seasonal construction exposure and areas immediately adjacent to silt or sand lens]. Red River Valley clay soils below nominal depth 12 to 25 feet generally experience extreme slow change in moisture content seasonally, with long term [i.e. decade level event] slight to moderate change in moisture content following cyclical drought or wet cycles common to the northern prairie. The extreme depth of clay deposit within the Red River Valley precludes construction of conventional frost foundations on other than soil having heave potential. Thus, the major means of reducing risk of heave to construction includes; isolation of lightly loaded floor slabs from more heavily loaded foundation element, allowing unhindered movement between walls / floor and any piped penetrations and, most importantly, providing continuous automated drainage of site during construction and permanent subsurface drainage of foundations and at-grade floors longterm. Lacking access to moisture, heave prone clay soils will have minimal if any volume change. fs) PROJECT SUMPS The collection, control and removal of seepage and runoff from within project excavations is critical in maintaining the bearing capacity of native soils, in-place density of engineered fill and stability of embankments at project excavations. As constructed, it is our opinion all sumps should consist of a 2 foot by 2 foot or larger plan dimension excavation(s) located adjacent to and directly exterior to the excavation oversize limit for structural engineered fill. Sump excavations should extend a minimum of 2 feet below the base of the excavation for collection of seepage and runoff. All sumps should be lined with a non-woven, needle-punched, geotextile having a grab tensile strength equal to or greater than 70 pounds per square inch (psi). A standpipe of 12 inches in diameter or larger should be centered within the sump excavation. This pipe should include sufficient openings for entry of seepage. We recommend that the standpipe extend to the ground surface to facilitate pumping during project construction. Infill within the sump area should consist of a VA to % inch clear rock placed between the standpipe and walls of the sump excavation. Pumping of sump(s) should continue until completion of the construction or until the Geotechnical Engineer of Record indicates such pumping is no longer necessary for stability of the project footings and related construction. Sumps should be abandoned per methods required by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record and per Federal, State and local governmental statutes. Discharge from sumps should be directed away from site and be disposed within storm water systems or other systems which comply with Federal, State and local governmental statute. As constructed and operated, the General Contractor should be responsible for all permits, operation and abandonment of sumps or other temporary dewatering systems. SCAN APPENDIX C scmiD ti f ■■ i'-/ s S*3S3?i4 •.r .■■ *'><r-IP m a: feeti meters'■100 scmm Northern Technologies, Inc. Ik 1 3522 4th Ave S I I Fargo, ND 58103-2224 V Telephone: 701-232-1822 CLIENT Gene Erpeldinq____________ BORING NUMBER SB-1 PAGE 1 OF 2 Long: -96° 4’38.64" Lat: 46° 41’45.96" PROJECT NAME Erpeldinq Retaining Wall PROJECT NUMBER 15-13134.100 PROJECT LOCATION Pelican Rapids, Minnesota GROUND ELEVATION 100 ftDATE STARTED 7/22/15 COMPLETED 7/22/15 HOLE SIZE "6 1/2" in. DRILLING CONTRACTOR NTI GROUND WATER LEVELS; DRILLING METHOD 3 1/4 in. H.S.A.AT TIME OF DRILLING See Report LOGGED BY Chris Nelson CAVE IN (ft) _NA________ CHECKED BY Dan Gibson AT END OF DRILLING AFTER DRILLING —FROST DEPTH (ft) NA NOTES Drilling mud added to auger from 25 to 50 feet______ ATTERBERG LIMITSLLIZLU oz20 Q. f- LU 5M ET sgsoz LU2>->-X D. QS,!=gi|Ja bx£-UJ“ 2 ii LUoSbMATERIAL DESCRIPTION XoHb2 5< sicnit:w 1 LUQOOooLU<oLX(X Qw0 AUTOPSOIL, ORGANIC CLAY WITH SAND, (OL) black1.0 1 SILTY SAND, (SM) brown, fine to medium grained, loose SS 3-3-4672(7) 4.85 SS 4-5-7POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine grained, medium dense 78 (12)3 SS 4-6-689§4 (12) I 9.0 i POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine to coarse grained, medium dense to looseI10 SS 5-6-5895(11)i9 II SS 2-2-4S896(6)I 14.0 86.0 POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine grained, medium dense15 SS 3-6-7I1007(13)iis 17.5I SS 3-5-7100SANDY SILT, (ML) brown, medium dense, with lenses of sand, fine to medium grained 3 8 (12) I 20 20.0 80.0 SS 3-5-7100POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, medium to ^ coarse grained, medium dense s 9 (12)SI 3 78.5 POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) light brown, fine to medium grained, denseI SS 7-8-1189710(19) 76.0IPOORLY GFIADED SAND, (SP) brown, medium to coarse grained, wet, dense25 SS 7-10-11§8911 (21) 1 26.5 73.5 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL, (GP) brown, wet, dense, trace cobbles SS 7-10-1210012(22)dOC5 -fa 0I >308 SS 8-11-12111aOeiC5 13 (23) i (Continued Next Page) BORING NUMBER SB-1Northern Technologies, Inc. 3522 4th Ave S Fargo, ND 58103-2224 Telephone: 701-232-1822 PAGE 2 OF 2 Long: -96° 4' 38.64" Lat: 46° 41’45.96" PROJECT NAME Erpeldinq Retaining WallCLIENT Gene Erpeldinq PROJECT LOCATION Peiican Rapids. MinnesotaPROJECT NUMBER 15-13134.100 ATTERBERG LIMITSLUSSz111 ^CL C/3 UJ mfflO> LU>-QC2 QC >-CLQC I-coIUJbDb?o Oz UJI-UJ ii 1-et XzQ.>QMATERIAL DESCRIPTION Pb 2 oz20 o 25S<LUQ£§!CO2-^1 b £D LLQOO>COooq:UJ<CLOQC0.QCO 0. POORLY GRADED GRAVEL, (GP) brown, wet, dense, trace cobbles (continued)66.533.5 POORLY GRADED SAND, (SP) brown, medium to coarse grained, wet, dense, trace gravel, trace cobbles35 SS 7-12-15100(27)14 62.537.5 POORLY GFIADED SAND, (SP) gray, coarse grained, wet, dense to very dense, with gravel, trace cobbles 40 7-12-15SS89(27)15 45 SS 12-18-167816(34)§ iiIsi§ t 50 SS 9-12-1478i(26)1749.051.0I Bottom of borehole at 51.0 feet.3 io Isi3 Is S i ai iI § ii aBI I§ 1si OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 218-998-8095County of Otter Tail, Government Services Center, 540 West Fir, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 6:30 P.M. Roll Call / Approval of Minutes Stanley & Charlene Winter Old Business (7/8/15) Sec 27/Otter Tail Twp 46000270094002 Pickerel Lake Steven Lind & Todd Axtman Old Business (7/15/15) Big McDonald Lake Sec 20/Edna Twp 20000200105003 Sec 11/Scambler Twp 55000990340000 55000990341000 55000990730000 Old Business (8/12/15) Pelican LakeEugene & Michelle Erpelding Sec 4/Otter Tail Twp 46000991002000 Ed Smith Topographical Alteration Otter Tail Lake ONLY ONE MEETING FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER OTTER TAIL COUNTY LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION WWW.CO.OTTER-TAILMN.USOTTf R TflUOOfftTT-flIllltOTB GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR AVENUE FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-998-8095 FAX: 218-998-8112 August 13, 2015 Eugene & Michelle Erpelding PO Box 85 Edgeley, ND 58433 RE: Conditional Use Permit Application, Pelican Lake (56-786) Dear Eugene & Michelle: On August 12, 2015, the Planning Commission passed a motion to table your request. Their motion is as follows: A motion by Boyer, second by Wilson to table to September 9, 2015 at the Applicant’s request per letter received at Land & Resource Management on July 21, 2015. Please have your material submitted to Land & Resource no later than August 21,2015. If you have any questions, please contact our Office. Sincerely, Amy Busko Recording Secretary SCANNED0 otter Tail County, Planning Commission August 12, 2015; Page 2 more perpendicular to the road. 3. Indicate the location of road access on Lots 1 & 2 Blk,Tj 4. Review septic locations on Lots 1 & 2 Blk 1. 5. A revised Preliminary Plat drawing must be provided to Land & Resource. Voting: All Members in favor. “Sunset Bay View” / Marv Hexum -Approve As Revised: A Preliminary Plat titled "Sunset Bay View” consisting of 5 Single Family Residential Lots, 1 Block and a Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Construct a 550’± long road & a 300’ long driveway. Road will meet County Spec & Service “Sunset Bay View”. Driveway will be 14’ wide ± by 300’ long with a maximum fill 3’ & topped with 6” of class 5 gravel. The proposal is located in Pt of GL 2, Section 6 of Dead Lake Township; Star Lake (56-385), GD. Motion July 8, 2015: A motion by Wilson, second by Frazier to table (at the Applicant’s request) to August 12, 2015 allowing the Applicant to: 1. Define the wetlands on proposed Lot 5. 2. Redefine buildable area to accommodate wetlands on proposed Lot 5. 3. Review the approach from Beaver Dam Road to proposed Lot 5. 4. Confirm water depth of Star Lake for all lots, insuring accessibility from shore. Material must be submitted to Land & Resource no later than July 22, 2015. Marv Hexum and Josh Pfeffer (Meadow Land Surveying) represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Schwartz, second by Bailey to approve the revised drawing dated July 22,2015. Voting: All Members in favor. Eugene & Michele Erpeldinq - Tabled to September 9, 2015: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Landscape lake side with retaining walls, plants and shrubs. Includes a 12’ x 28’ patio with fire pit and 5 retaining walls totaling 182’. Approximately 277 cubic yards. The project is located in Lake View Beach 2^'^ Addition NW 12’ of Lot 14 & all of 15 & 16 and Lake View Beach 2"^ Addition Res Lot B of Blk 1 & NW 12’ of Res C, Section 11 of Scambler Township; Pelican Lake (56-786), GD. Motion July 8. 2015: A motion by Bailey, second by Schwartz to table (at the Applicant’s request) to August 12, 2015, allowing the applicant time to provide a soil analysis from a Soils Engineer. Material must be submitted to Land & Resource no later than July 22, 2015. Voting: All Members in favor. Motion: A motion by Boyer, second by Wilson to table to September 9, 2015 at the Applicant’s request per letter received at Land & Resource Management on July 21, 2015. Voting: All Members in favor. “Prosperity Hills” - Red River Valley Campfire & David Ebersviller (Developer Prosperity Properties) - Tabled until the completion of the Environmental Review Process : A Preliminary Plat titled "Prosperity Hills” consisting of 25 Single Family Residential Lots 2 Blocks and a Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Construct a road 3,550’ long for Preliminary Plat of “Prosperity Hills” in Candor Twp. - built to County & Township specifications. Proposed cul-de-sac termination as a “T” instead of a cul-de-sac, per request by Township Officials. (Alt B) Approx. 10,500 cy/yct net cut & 14,000 r '’^ce/i/go JUi 2 j To: Marsha Bowman Recording Secretary Land & Resource Management 540 West Fir Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 2015 Unoj, From: Eugene & Michelle Erpelding P 0 Box 85 Edgeley, NO 58433 RE: Conditional Use Permit Application; Pelican Lake (56-786) On July O'*" the Planning Commission passed a motion to table my request to the August IZ"* meeting. I have Northern Technologies Inc. engaged in the process of boring the soil and providing a soil analysis, the analysis will not be complete in time for the August 12*^ meeting therefore I request that the Planning Commission consider my application for their September 9, 2015 meeting. The time extension should provide adequate time for me to obtain a complete and detailed report from the Soils Engineer. Thank you. £?7-c Eugene Erpelding Marsha Bowman Marsha Bowman Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:10 AM 'Gene Erpelding' RE: Conditional Use Permit Extension From; Sent: To: Subject: Gene Erpelding, I have received your letter requesting your Conditional Use Permit Application be tabled to the September 9, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting. I will submit your request to the Planning Commission for consideration at their August 12"^ Meeting. As we discussed on the phone this morning, you will receive a letter confirming their action. Provided the Planning Commission accommodates your request, you will need to submit your soil survey plans to our Office by Wednesday, August 19, 2015. If you have any questions, please contact me. Marsha Hanhoy Bcywmxxyi/ OffUx-Adminiityatcfr- Lcvnd'Sr Ke^cnir-ce' aSC, 540 W fir ferg^A^faily, MW 56537 218-998-8099 £i<OTTCR TRIl ^11^' ooooTT • atafliiOTi From: Gene Erpelding rmailto:Gene.ErDeldinq(g)alliedaQ.com1 Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:51 AM To: Marsha Bowman Subject: Conditional Use Permit Extension Please provide to the Planning Commission Thank you, Gene Erpelding Chief Executive Officer Allied Energy, Inc. dba Allied Grain Allied Agronomy, LLC 109 Industrial Park Edgeley, ND 58433 e-mail: gene.erpelding(Salliedag.com Phone: 701-830-0115 Visit us at: http://www.alliedag.com/ This e-mail message mav contain privileged and/or confidential information, and is intended to he received only by persons entitled to receive such information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediatelv. Please delete it and all attachments from any servers, hard drives or any other media. Other use of this e-mail hv you is strictly prohibited. 1 !■ ' • All e-mails and attachments sent and received are subject to monitoring, reading and archival by Allied “• r. ■ Agronomy LLC; including its subsidiaries. The recipient of this e-mail is solely responsible for checking far the- .presence of " Viruses " or 'other ’’Malware". Allied Agronomy 'LLC, along with its subsidiaries, accepts no liability far any damage caused, by any such.code transmitted by or accompanying this e-mail or any attachment ■ ■■ ' I 2 V. I OTTER TAIL COUNTY LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION WWW.CO.OTTER-TAIL.MN.US i OTTER milOOPBIT-aiSQIfOTR GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR AVENUE FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-998-8095 FAX: 218-998-8112 July 10, 2015 Eugene & Michelle Erpelding PO Box 85 Edgeley, ND 58433 RE: Conditional Use Permit Application; Pelican Lake (56-786) ! Eugene & Michelle Erpelding: On July 9, 2015 the Planning Commission passed a motion to table your request. Their motion is as follows: A motion by .Bailey, second by $chwartz to table (at the Applicant’s request) to August 12, 2015, allowing the applicant time to provide a soil analysis from a Soils Engineer. Material must be submitted to Land & Resource noi later than July 22, 2015. If you have any questions, please!contact our Office. Sincerely, a [) Marsha Bowman Recording Secretary rT /•t Otter Tail County, Planning Commission July 8, 2015; Page 3 Eugene & Michele Erpelding - Tabled to August 12, 2015: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Landscape lake side with retaining walls, plants and shrubs. Includes a 12’ x 28’ patio with fire pit and 5 retaining walls totaling 182’. Approximately 277 cubic yards. The project is located in Lake View Beach 2^^ Addition NW 12’ of Lot 14 & all of 15 & 16 and Lake View Beach 2^'^ Addition Res Lot B of BIk 1 & NW 12’ of Res C, Section 11 of Scambler Township: Pelican Lake (56-786), GD. Eugene George Erpelding represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Bailey, second by Schwartz to table (at the Applicant’s request) to August 12, 2015, allowing the applicant time to provide a soil analysis from a Soils Engineer. Material must be submitted to Land & Resource no later than July 22, 2015. Voting: All Members in favor. “Prosperity Hills” - Red River Valiev Campfire & David Ebersviller (Developer Prosperity Properties) - Tabled to August 12, 2015: A Preliminary Plat titled "Prosperity Hills” consisting of 25 Single Family Residential Lots 2 Blocks and a Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Construct a road 3,550’ long for Preliminary Plat of “Prosperity Hills” in Candor Twp. - built to County & Township specifications. Proposed cul-de-sac termination as a “T” instead of a cul-de-sac, per request by Township Officials. (Alt B) Approx. 10,500 cu yd net cut & 14,000 cu yd net excavation. The project is located in Pt of GL’s 2 & 3, Sections 10 & 15 of Candor Township: Trowbridge Lake (56-532), RD & Ida Lake (56-534), NE. Darin Trites, Scott Zak, Maverick Larson (Compass Consultants) & Jay Berube (Apex Engineering) represented the Application. Duane Fillipi (representing himself and Chairman of the Leek Lake Association) expressed concerns regarding the raising of property taxes, water traffic, environmental issues, the installation of a public access. Joe Oliaro spoke in favor of the project on behalf of Campfire USA and the project would repurpose the property. Brian Bellerud had questions regarding the need for an impact study, the use of a parcel as a public access, the requirements of 5 acre metes and bounds tracts, and turn lanes off the County Highway. Tammy Richter (resort owner on the lake) expressed concerns regarding taxes. Linda Motzko (property owner on Ida Lake) had a question regarding the Lions Hall, expressed environmental concerns, increase of traffic on CSAH 17, increase in property tax, water traffic, and the impact on wetlands. Corey Peterson had questions regarding the maintenance of the proposed road. Henry Moltzan (Township Supervisor) indicated that prior to the Township accepting the road, their requirements must be met. Donald Motzko had questions regarding the approved use of the property (i.e. public access). Motion: A motion by Wilson, second by Frazier to table (at the Applicant’s request) to August 12, 2015, allowing for a reduction of 3 lots (Trowbridge/Leek Lake side) to accommodate the sensitive areas and the density. Revised maps must be submitted to Land & Resource no later than July 22, 2015. Voting: All Members in favor. LLoQctUJr:>cCOUJU!O cc °eQ 2 3 Deck Railing Deck Landscape Rock Leveled Out Seating Area Rip Rap tOutcroppingOutcropping 1 2 5 10 20Water Line 0 feet€ > Section B - 050615 Erpelding 5-ii'ie.50512 Co Hwy 9, Pelican Rapids MN Drawn by: AKA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION List & identify all existing & proposed onsite impervious surfaces on scale drawing. Signature: / y 6 'C' /rDate: Buildings Other Impervious Surface Existing Proposed Existingi-i.2 Proposed Ft^Ft^Ft Ft Dwelling Deck(s) Attached Garage Patio(s) Detached Garage y sS~ &Sidewalk(s) Storage Shed Landing(s) WOAS Driveway(s)S^o RCU Parking Area(s) Miscellaneous Retaining Wall(s)S2-e> Landscaping (Plastic Barrier)7 SO Miscellaneous SS(^TOTAL BUILDINGS TOTAL OTHER Buildings Impervious Surface Percentage Maximum Allowable 20% Existing Proposed Total Lot Area Impervious Surface Ratio Ft^ Ft^ Ft^Ft^Total Buildings f-z;L /.^9C>100+-7-X Buildings + Other Impervious Surface Percentage Maximum Allowable 25% C c Total 'Z Buildings + Other impervious Surface Existing Proposed Total Lot Area Impervious Surface Ratio 2::Ft^Ft^Ft^Ft^ r- 100+-r X Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet 03-25-2014 SCALE DRAWING FORM iSS'aoir? oSHoaooi SSco 9^63^/oo 0 S<'fiOQ7f’ a 7.3o ' Tax Parcel Number(s) ' <i>0 O The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands and topographic features (i.e. bluffs). Must also complete the Impervious Surface Calculation (see back). I Scale I Signature of Property Owner Date BK —032014 354,520 • Viciof Lundeen Co. PfiniefS • Fergus Palls, MN • 1-800-346-4870 Lake - Current Water Line Ui o%aLii O>COUJLLi ^ 3 tr"'Step units O c4Leveled Out Seating Area (Grass)»-a //fe UJCk/ /II^ f QtrFire Pit 3EZZ3 Patio ■7 I I >•V,v I I vvExisting Deck Door ResidenceO 12 5 10 :o □0 feet l|R ^Beyond If %Out(joorsMtr Plan-052115 Erpelding Drawn by: AKA50512 Co Hwy 9, Pelican Rapids MN 1^ ry k:’x*:-:‘:'>v*:%^:v:*:’:v ;':':*:':v:v:':s‘:v:v:::! •»•••••• »,* ••«**••«»«*v.%%y«• * ** ••' >»»*»•»•••• • « ^ • * I* * * * • • ** - A***.********.*** • • .•«*>a44*«««k****4« >*•*•»••••>«• , » ’ > ^ 11*- r=s LU OO5LUO>CO mLUIToViclccry Engineering & Consulting V'llaS® Woods Drive, ^dcn Prairie, MN (pW ?52^2^-l?7l (fax) rvickery@viclceryeng.com May 18, 2015 7:14:30 AM o»LU QITz3 Material Quantity Estimate RCP 15-091 Soil Parameters:VKt' IVoject Number:d> I Degrees!nr IPCFIReinforced:28 125Rosetta OutcropBlock Product Used: Retained:28 125Client:Rochester Concrete Products Foundation:TISMr. (;ien NcvalaClient Contact: by e-mail onlyClient Fax Number: F2rpclding ProjectProject Name:[Reinforcement Manufacturer:! Strata | Project Location:Pelican Rapids, MN Design Methodology:NCMA Additional information available upon written request.(irading Plan By:AKA 4/28/2015Grading Plan Date: Notes: The soil parameters used for this preliminary quantity estimate were assumed. No site-specific geotechnical information was available at the time this quantity estimate was performed. Actual on-site conditions may differ from the assumed conditions and may cause the estimated quantities to change. Global stability has not been considered, as it is beyond the scope of services for this preliminary quantity estimate. A global stability analysis may cause the estimated segmental retaining wall block quantities and estimated geosynthetic reinforcement quantities to change. This quantity estimate is for bidding purposes only. No design, preliminary or otherwise, is intended or implied. Square Yards SG200 Cubic Yds of Reinf. Soil Cubic Yds of Leveling Pad Cubic Yds of Drainage Agg. Total sq ft of Block Tallest X-Sec. (ft) Total sq ft of wall face Number of Pallet A Number of Pallet B Number of Pallet C Lineal Feet of Paragrid Length of wallWall 270 7.033231631,386 135 40 3 1816 180 3.02000 3 82339944 27 450 13.02836410 10 5 1,176 225 67 33 27 180 4.017621,848 90 4 144444 4 20 270 6.05 44 264 6 6 3 1,848 135 40 4 TOTALS:30 30 6,258 585 173 87 1,3501821,134 15 17 OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING eOMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT:Eugene & Michelle Erpelding PO Box 85 Edgeley.ND 58433 - i HEARING DATE/LOCATION: July 8, 2015, at 7:30 P.M. Commissioner's Room, Government Services Center West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST {as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Landscape lake side with retaining walls, plants and shrubs. Includes a 12’ x 28’ patio with fire pit and 5 retaining walls totaling 182’. Approximately 277 cubic yards. LAKE NAME/NUMBER/CLASS: Pelican Lake (56-786), GD E-911 ADDRESS: 50512 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lake View Beach 2"^' Addition NW 12’ of Lot 14 & all of 15 & 16 and Lake View Beach 2"'’ Addition Res Lot B of BIk 1 & NW-12’ of Res C, Section 11 of Scambler Township ** Weather Conditions may change the Hearing date and time. If bad weather occurs, please listen to the local Fergus Falls Radio Stations or contact the Land & Resource Management Office, by 4:30 p.m., for possible rescheduling of the Hearing.____________ __________________________• _______________________ _______________ The above Applicant has made Application to the Otter Tail County Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit as per the requirements of the Shorelapd Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Details of the Application are available for viewing at the Land & Resource-Management Office, Government Services Center 540: West Fir, Fergus Falls, MN 56537. Any comments regarding this request may be expressed at the Hearing or mailed to the Land & Resource Management Office at the above address. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS SHOULD CONTACT THE LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HEARING. Bert Olson June 24. 2015 Chairman Planning Commission Mailing Date LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY, GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL ) I, Marsha Bowman, duly appointed and Acting Secretary of the Otter Tail County Plannim Commissi^ for Otter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that on ^ day of —, 2015, the attached Notice of Hearing and was duly served upon the following: County Sheriff County Highway Engineer the Courthouse Otter Tail COLA, PO Box 53, Ottertail City, MN 56571 MPCA, 714 Lake Ave., Suite 220, Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 DNR, Julie Aadland, Div. Eco & Water Resources, 1509 1st Ave N, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Shawn Donais, DNR, Trails & Waterways Jim Welters, DNR, Div. of Fisheries Doug Hedtke, DNR, Div. of Wildlife Planning Commission Members (The above receive aU Notices) Lake Improvement District (if project is located on their lake, majl^otices to the Lake Improvgr^ent District) Big McDonald: Big McDonald Lake Improvement DisL^PCT^x 81, Dent, MN Devils (Near Perham): Devils Lake lmp.-0!lLr%Jeana M Nelson ,42681'T^rovilla Rd, Perham, MN Little McDonald, Kerbs & PauL,-Hnt^l^Lakes Imp. Dist., Pp-BdlTTsS, Perham, MN 56573,,^ ^ Litjle Pine & Big Piijej^'^'^Pine Lakes Imp. D\s\^j^^O-Box405, Perham, MN 56§Z3--''^'^ ^X^Iican^^pshT^^s & Little Pelican: Peli^^frtial^ Group Lake lmo/^§t<'%Pr^ Manuel, 26271 Otoson RD, Detroit Lakes MN 56501 SooffTrurtle Lake: South Turtle Lake Imp. Dist., %Brlcker & Janet Johnsen, 32790 Turtle Shore Ln, Undenwood, MN 56586 Same Envelope P8629 '€UyjQl^riKtrfoc^tedufldlbii>5miti«s-ef-arTtty)/'^---------^ N^4NOOT'Di§t^£ffii:»rTeoeU±VYJLi}AVr13etroia^keaJ4^^ ’vAdjaceRt-GotrrrtyZeqing Administratoj^lf-the^^ounty isTli the "bullfei) - dleck their website for^atTreTagdresT" TifyAudrtbc4notifyjn_a^ditioA4e4h6jc_Zoning AdJJxiwstraToFyT^eckThelnWe^ fof-naFfte/aa3fesT~^ ^ Per BK, do not notify individuals within a City Limit Becka Township ClenGlake Associationr)sur\feyor (if appropriate), - ■anaTFio^eTisted oTTfhe attached sheet..., by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing them in the U.S. Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, properly addressed to each of the above named at the addresses shown above. (7 Secretary If parcel owner is “USA”, mail to Fish & Wildlife Service, 18965 Co. Hwy 82, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 If parcel owner is “DNR", ignore as they are receiving a notice as stated above If parcel owner is "St. of MN. 375 Centennial Bldg, Spec Asst, to Atty General St. Paul, MN mail to DNR Lands & Minerals 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd NE Bemidji, MN 56601 PC Affidavit 02-2015 IBSIQM MGTiFiCATIOI^ 'WORKSHEET nditiona! Use Apps / V2 Mile.(2640’) for Preliminary Plats)PLAHumo-cmmMile (1320^)to^ LJjAl/yUApplicant:J Lake: ^ ^ Ip Meeting Date: Date Assigned:Assigned To: Completed:Return By: *Township I County Roads: Sherry (GIS) will get mapj listing, labels (she has an advanced mapping system), unless it is adjacent to the parcel(s) that run the length of the road project. Be sure to list the road name(s) and the parcel number(s) involved with the project on this sheet. • i', Townships / Sections / Plats: 6 6 ono <^<^r/)73n 32 MtdAW cjd ^AtJ _______ PC:Worksheet Notification 03/08 Interactive Land Viewer - Otter Tail County, MN - Bigger - Better - FASTER Page 1 of 1 I# SI XOtter Tail County, MN - Interactive Land Map (Parcels) Flex Viewer v2.5H About;ir? 2012 Fergus Falls' 2007 Fergus Falls20031992Easoniau___Iqiud___2013 Photo 2010 _____________ 2009 2008BIB ;Enhanced Se„f t S m \ \ PIus V-», lantroifflo■j U6M! aSim 44 n pICO{ \C^ 'C.fisoQ^grtazacxxi IE \fs http://www.ottertailcounty.net/flexviewers/land/6/22/2015 Buffei’ Parcels Parcel No 55000110069000 Walter J & Tonette E Palmer Name 1 AddrlName 2 Addr 2 Citv St Zio 11413 Landing Rd Eden Prairie MN 55347 4951 55000110069001 Sandra Rundle Stack 50713 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078 Bert D & Teresa L Mcdonough55000110069002 50733 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078 55000110069003 Gerald C & Debora S Olafson 2911 Remuda Dr Bismarck ND 58501 0103 55000110069005 James R & Merryll H Fawbush 622 10th St N Moorhead MN 56560 2056 55000110069007 Debra Lamb 20231 Pelican Dr 5 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7077 55000110069009 S & C Park Properties Lie 42648 240th St Battle Lake MN 56515 9638 55000110069011 James & Tina Flynn 3617 49th St N Fargo ND 58102 5451 55000110070001 Diane M Reveling 6409 2nd St N Moorhead MN 56560 6423 55000110071000 Walter J & Tonette E Palmer 11413 Landing Rd Eden Prairie MN 55347 4951 55000110071006 Matthew DTharaldson Po Box 9797 Fargo ND 58106 9797 55000990326000 Michael Steven Huffman 50469 Angle Rd Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7089 55000990327000 Michael Steven Huffman 50469 Angle Rd Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7089 55000990328000 Michael Steven Huffman 50469 Angle Rd Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7089 55000990329000 Michael Steven Huffman 50469 Angle Rd Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7089 55000990330000 Daniel Carlson 604 35th Ave E West Fargo ND 58078 5419 55000990331000 George & Jule Fredrickson 1205 Cedar Way West Fargo ND 58078 3373 55000990332000 John F & Paul H Oehike 512 15th Ave N Wahpeton ND 58075 3615 55000990333000 Thomas A Barth 520 Queens Ct Moorhead MN 56560 6777 55000990334000 Brent T Jenkins Po Box 1904 Fargo ND 58107 1904 55000990335000 Luan Schuman Po Box 9851 Fargo ND 58106 9851 55000990336000 David Bergeson & N Dolishny 2818 Oakpoint Dr Los Angeles CA 90068 2034 55000990337000 Diane M Reveling 6409 2nd St N Moorhead MN 56560 6423 Mondav. June 22. 2015 Page 1 of 3 Parcel No 55000990338000 Jeffery & Marci Hoff Addr 2Addr 1Name 2 Citv St Zio Parley MN 56574 0365 Name 1 Po Box 365 55000990340000 Eugene & Michelle Erpelding Edgeley ND 58433 0085Po Box 85 Edgeley ND 58433 008555000990341000 Eugene & Michelle Erpelding Po Box 85 55000990342000 Matthew D Tharaldson Po Box 9797 Fargo ND 58106 9797 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 701655000990343000 Parker C Simison Et Al 21183 Broadwater Dr Pelican Rapids MN 56572 707855000990344900 Jack G & Renae M Tillisch 50538 County Highway 9 16602 Orchard Hills Dr N55000990346000 Gail Varenhorst Et Al Sun City West AZ 85351 1724 55000990347000 Gail Varenhorst Et Al 16602 Orchard Hills Dr N Sun City West AZ 85351 1724 55000990348000 Jon B & Pamela F Johnson 50574 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7097 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 709755000990349000 Jon B & Pamela F Johnson 50574 County Highway 9 Vance A & Leann M Stueness 50584 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 707855000990350000 Jerald & Marie Olsen 2030 Soderville Dr Ne Ham Lake MN 55304 442355000990352000 Sioux Falls SD 57106 547155000990353000Grant & Ann Tschetter 1401 Hyannis Port Ln S 55000990354000 Grant & Ann Tschetter Sioux Falls SD 57106 54711401 Hyannis Port Ln S 55000990355000 Gregory A & Deborah K Seurer Moorhead MN 56560 6710480 41st Ave S 55000990356000 Gregory A & Deborah K Seurer Moorhead MN 56560 6710480 41st Ave S Jerome E Sondag55000990357000 50640 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078 55000990358000 James SiTina Flynn 3617 49th St N Fargo ND 58102 5451 55000990361000 Jay B OInes 17583 Long Lake Rd W Detroit Lakes MN 56501 7929 55000990362000 Robert F & Sharon B Rubeck Holmes Beach FL 34217 21242914 Avenue C 55000990726000 Richard Raasch 50468 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7097 State Of Minnesota55000990728000 Attn Tax Specialist Saint Paul MN 55155 4045Po Box 45 55000990729000 Jeffery & Marci Hoff Perley MN 56574 0365Po Box 365 55000990730000 Eugene & Michelle Erpelding Edgeley ND 58433 0085Po Box 85 Mondav. June 22. 2015 Paee 2 of 3 Parcel No Name 1 Addrl 500 Lafayette Rd Addr2Name 2 Citv St ZiD 55Q00990732000 State Of Minnesota Attn Tax Specialist Saint PauIMN 55155 4045Po Box 45 55000990733000 State Of Minnesota Saint Paul MN 55155 4045Attn Tax Specialist 500 Lafayette Rd Po Box 45 55000990734000 State Of Minnesota Attn Tax Specialist 500 Lafayette Rd Saint PauIMN 55155 4045Po Box 45 55000990735000 JaySamuelson 1401 25th Ave S Apt 105 Fargo ND 58103 5219 55000990736000 Tina Johnson Attn Marlene Marsh Po Box 565 Fargo ND 58107 0565 55000990737000 Teri & Rodney Helling Po Box 88 Parkers Prairie MN 56361 0088 55000990738000 Pamela L & Brent T Jenkins Po Box 1904 Fargo ND 58107 1904 55000990739000 Pamela L & Brent T Jenkins Po Box 1904 Fargo ND 58107 1904 55000990740000 Debra Lamb 20231 Pelican Dr S Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7077 55000990828000 Ace A Brandt Po Box 230 Fargo ND 58107 0230 Monday. June 22. 2015 Page 3 of 3 Buffer Mail Address i Address 2Name City, State, Zip Thomas A Barth 520 Queens Ct Moorhead MN 56560 6777 Ace A Brandt Po Box 230 Fargo ND 58107 0230 Daniel Carlson 604 35th Ave E West Fargo ND 58078 5419 David Bergeson & N Dolishny 2818 Oakpoint Dr Los Angeles CA 90068 2034 Eugene & Michelle Erpelding Edgeley ND 58433 0085Po Box 85 James R & Merryll H Fa\wbush 622 10th St N Moorhead MN 56560 2056 James & Tina Flynn 3617 49th St N Fargo ND 58102 5451 George 8i Jule Fredrickson 1205 Cedar Way West Fargo ND 58078 3373 Teri & Rodney Helling Po Box 88 Parkers Prairie MN 56361 0088 Jeffery & Marci Hoff Po Box 365 Perley MN 56574 0365 Michael Steven Huffman 50469 Angle Rd Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7089 Brent T Jenkins Po Box 1904 Fargo ND 58107 1904 Pamela L & Brent T Jenkins Po Box 1904 Fargo ND 58107 1904 Jon B & Pamela F Johnson 50574 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7097 Tina Johnson Po Box 565 Fargo ND 58107 0565 Debra Lamb 20231 Pelican DrS Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7077 Bert D 8i Teresa L Mcdonough 50733 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078 John F & Paul H Oehike 512 15th Ave N Wahpeton ND 58075 3615 Gerald C & Debora S Olafson 2911 Remuda Dr Bismarck ND 58501 0103 Jay B OInes 17583 Long Lake Rd W Detroit Lakes MN 56501 7929 Monday, June 22, 2015 Page 1 of 2 City, State, ZipAddress 2Address 1Name Ham Lake MN 55304 44232030 Soderville Dr Ne■Jerald & Marie Olsen Eden Prairie MN 55347 495111413 Landing RdWalter J & Tonette E Palmer Pelican Rapids MN 56572 709750468 County Highway 9Richard Raasch Moorhead MN 56560 64236409 2nd St NDiane M Reveling Holmes Beach FL 34217 2124Robert F & Sharon B Rubeck 2914 Avenue C Battle Lake MN 56515 9638S & C Park Properties Lie 42648 240th St Fargo ND 58103 5219Jay Samuelson 1401 25th Ave S Apt 105 Fargo ND 58106 9851Luan Schuman Po Box 9851 Moorhead MN 56560 6710Gregory A & Deborah K Seurer 480 41st Ave S Pelican Rapids MN 56572 701621183 Broadwater DrParker C Simison Et Al Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078Jerome E Sondag 50640 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078Sandra Rundle Stack 50713 County Highway 9 Saint Paul MN 55155 4045State Of Minnesota Po Box 45 Saint Paul MN 55155 4045State Of Minnesota 500 Lafayette Rd Po Box 45 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078Vance A & Leann M Stueness 50584 County Highway 9 Matthew D Tharaldson Fargo ND 58106 9797Po Box 9797 Pelican Rapids MN 56572 7078Jack G & Renae M Tillisch 50538 County Highway 9 Grant & Ann Tschetter Sioux Falls SD 57106 54711401 Hyannis Port Ln S Gail Varenhorst Et Al 16602 Orchard Hills Dr N Sun City West AZ 85351 1724 Monday, J>une 22, 2015 Page 2 of 2 LU oQoc3UJa>O') UJ Ul rOoeUJQcc2 Karl Foerster Grass ^ Hot Rod Switchgrasa 0 Blue Chip Juniper rK Broadmoor Juniper / Bagalele Barberry : Arctic Fire Dogwood T. Ivory Hak) Dogwood Little Devil NInebarK Gro-Low Sumac 4 Wood's Purple Aster Spring Snow Crab • Black Hills Sr-ruce <Lake - Current Water Line 0 tStep^^^ Leveled Out Seating Area (Grass)EZZlI Fire Pit i 4#Barn Plank Pa0 OOacd®o I I u i I rO I I I ~r Y ■ ■ ■ ' IK-,. Existing Deck '/////////'■■ ■ • I ___I Door Residenceo 20 /12 5 10 Teet0 Planting Plan - 042815 Erpelding DcMunby: AKA50512 Co Hwy 9, Pelican Rapids MN tJJ oQ5LU>OCOLUui■ ccOLU•«nr ^a§ Deck Rail Deck - - Rosetta Wall P Plantings ^tamped Concrete Patio r Fire Pit r1OutcroppingOuteropping Outcropping-^ Wall: 5-^Rip Rap12 5 10 20 0 feet Water Line Section A - 050615 Erpelding Drawn by; AKA50512 Co Hwy 9, Pelican Rapids MN Piarming Commission County of Otter Tail Government Services Center 540 West Fir Fergus Falls MN 56537 us. POSTAGE »RTNEY BOWES Mm y. $ 000.48®ZIP 5653702 irv0001377350JUN 24 2015 ^ 2015JUL 0 S & C Park Properties Lie 42648 240th St Battle Lake MN 56515 9638 NI XIE MA/Oj; 571 OE 1009 0007/01/15 return to sender NO MAIL receptacleUNASlE to forward * 045 5-062 01-2 4-3 88Ct56557136440 !j|!|iL.lj!|lHnil|!;il||hhU!illJ!.!!!p!aid!h!!Hj!!5&S i OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT:Eugene & Michelle Erpelding PO Box 85 Edgeley, ND 58433 HEARING DATE/LOCATION:July 8, 2015, at 7:30 P.M. Commissioner's Room, Government Services Center West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Landscape lake side with retaining walls, plants and shrubs. Includes a 12’ x 28’ patio with fire pit and 5 retaining walls totaling 182’. Approximately 277 cubic yards. LAKE NAME/NUMBER/CLASS: Pelican Lake (56-786), GD E-911 ADDRESS: 50512 County Highway 9 Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 Lake View Beach 2"'^ Addition NW 12’ of Lot 14 & all of 15 & 16LEGAL DESCRIPTION: and Lake View Beach 2'^^ Addition Res Lot B of BIk 1 & NW 12’ of Res C, Section 11 of Scambler Township ** Weather Conditions may change the Hearing date and time. If bad weather occurs, please listen to the local Fergus Falls Radio Stations or contact the Land & Resource Management Office, by 4:30 p.m., for possible rescheduling of the Hearing. The above Applicant has made Application to the Otter Tail County Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit as per the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Details of the Application are available for viewing at the Land & Resource Management Office, Government Services Center 540 West Fir, Fergus Falls, MN 56537. Any comments regarding this request may be expressed at the Hearing or mailed to the Land & Resource Management Office at the above address. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS SHOULD CONTACT THE LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HEARING. June 24. 2015Bert Olson Mailing DateChairman Planning Commission