HomeMy WebLinkAbout54000020014005_Variances_08-03-1995779601
APPLtCATION FOR VARIANCE
FROM
OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA
'2'3-WS
II %WReceipt No.
Application Fee $
(218) 589-8873FrancisBelcourtJ.Phone:Owner:MiddleFirstLast Name
56515Route #1 Box 57A Battle Lake MN
Zip No.StateCityStreet & No.
56-390 Lake Class ^LongLake NameLake No.
1312 41 St. OlafTwp. NameTwp.RangeSec.
Legal Description;
Government Lot 4, Except Tracts.
*Fire No. or Lake ID #22.22 Acres
*Directions to property: Property just west of public access on north shore of Long Lake
(but road running through property is dead end and does not permit access to public access).
Parcel Number 54-000-02-0014-000
VARIANCE REQUESTED IS:
In 1986 11 lots were surveyed out on the north shore of Long Lake (two of which are backlots)
Each lot is at least 2.5 acres as shown on the attached drawing. Three of the lots were
conveyed and recorded prior to the effective date of the new ordinance (June 12th, 1995).
The lots which have been sold are identified on the attached drawing as lots 3, 4, and 5.
Lot 6 was presented for recording after the effective date of the new ordinance. The
Subdivision Controls Ordinance requires that subdivisions created by metes and bounds
descriptions, within the shoreland area, must be at least 5 acres. Recjuesting a variance
to allow the conveyance of the remaining parcel as surveyed in 1986 by metes and bounds
descriptions. Each parcel would be considered a buildable lot. The parcels to be covered
by this variance request are identified on the attached drawing as parcels 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, and 111 Each parcel is at least 2.5 acres. The road as shown on the attached drawing
has been built and is being maintained by the township.
Please note that a map and a legal description for each proposed parcel is attached. Lot numbers referenced above are on the attached drawing.
In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans,
information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING.
I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail
County.
June 27 th 95Application dated 19 . X
Signature Of Applicant
95August 3rd,Date of hearing;19 . Time:
MOTION AS FOLLOWS:
■ C.
Chairman
Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment1Permits) from Land & Resource Mana^&ient required:
i n h5 vl NOYES
mailed copy of Application to Applicant.(Date/lnitial)
MKL — 0483-001
258,371 — Victor Lundeen Co.. Printers. Fergus Falls, Minnesota o\/ee
■J.
ft k./o -ooo -J
ft
Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Feraling and unanim^dUsiy carried, to approve the following; 1. ) the recording of the parcel identified'^'as’^Lo'^-6, on the above
referenced surveyor's drawing, under the conditions and provisions of the pre June 12th,
1995, Subdivision Controls Ordinance, 2.) the combination of the parcels identified as Lots
7 and 8, on the above referenced surveyor's drawing, with the conditions that a private
easement for the owner(s) of the island can be maintained on the combined Lots 7 and 8 for
access purposes and when this tract is conveyed the drawing requirements of the June 12th, 1995, SubdivisidnfC.ont£ols7cirdifl'ince must be met at the time2(p^ red^'rdiSg', and 3. ) the
conveyance of the parcels identified as Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, and'll," on the above referenced
surveyor's drawing^' a's^^ep^r^te ^tracts; .with the condition that the drawarig requirements of
the June 12th, 1995,;Subdivision Controls Ordinance must be met abythe-tii^ of recording. It was noted that Lot 6 hM^bee^ii’ presented for recording on the l^th Vf Jitrfe^^’^1995, and
that the document was dated prior to the effective date (June 12th, 1995) of the revised
ordinance and that the recording should be permitted since it was very evident that the
transaction was in process during the transition to the revised ordinance,
noted that many of the other lots were in various stages of being conveyed and with the
exception of Lot 7, which must be combined with Lot 8 because of the significant amount of
low wet areas, all of the other lots should be allowed to be recorded as individual lots.
The timing of the new ordinance and the impact of the ordinance on the Belcourts was given
significant consideration by the Board in making their decision.
It was further
/cW- or
Office of County Recorder
County of Otter Tail
) hereby eaftily t|iM tlio within instrument was filed
lor/ecorti in ttiia 0(te on tlie ----day of£a.O. 19^at
^ily Microiilmed as iand wiisi
County RacordlJ
_____ Deputy