Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
53000990778000_Variances_07-14-2022_
f* Date Received 1230636 RECEIVED JUN 22 2022 WT LYHN R LARSON OTTER TAIL COUNTY RECORDER/REGISTRAR OF TITLES FERGUS FALLS, NH RECCiRDED ON 08/04/2022 11:30 AN :;THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER PAGES 2 WELL CERTIFICATE REC'D; N APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.ottertailcountvmn.us ■ DOApplication Fee 02-3Receipt Number F?yr ^liz^lzozz.Reviewed/Accepted By / Date David D. Sweere 612-819-9169PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 38690 Mistry Pt. P.O. Box 57, Richville, Mn 56576 DAYTIME PHONE dsweere@msn.comE-MAIL ADDRESS 56024300 Marion Lake General DevelopmentLAKE NUMBER _ SECTION TOWNSHIP LAKE NAME .LAKE CLASS Rush Lake135039RANGETOWNSHIP NAME UisTi/ PF .EtLilPARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS.5300090778000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Rainbow Point Estates Lot 08 Block 1 IF THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS REGARDING AN EXISTING STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY, WHAT YEAR WAS THAT STRUCTURE BUILT: 2002-04 INDICATE THE RELEVANT OTTER TAIL COUNTY ORDINANCE(S) FROM WHICH THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS FROM AND CITE THE SECTION(S) OF THE ORDINANCE(S). OTTER TAIL COUNTY ORDINANCE (Please Check) Shoreland Management Ordinance Sanitation Code I I Subdivision Controls Ordinance SECTION(S) OF ORDINANCE(S): 'Tllhli’ II [Z1 Renewable Energy Ordinance EH Other_______________ S'tc-Hpn (Oa. [^Attached Subsurface Sewage Treatment System Compliance Inspection EH No septic system on property 05/17/2022Inspection Date: t Page 2 Property Owner Sweere, David. D. 5300090778000Parcel Number SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS This WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. VARIANCE REQUEST: "Jt) be, 40 -firiowi ft- Vxwj X movxAd Soi Rii<<u.(<^-ec! ?d;ba!y^ is ^o'. I UNDERSTAND THAT 1 HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE, SANITATION AND/OR THE RENEWABLE ENERGY ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED; IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. June 15, 2022 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) OFFICE USE ONLY .b i'~l ■DO D-rr,Date Of Board of Adjustment Hearing Motion Time _ David D. Sweere - Variance Application Approved as Requested (7:24 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Terry Marthaler made a motion, seconded by Rick West and can ied to approve the variance to install a type 1 septic system (mound system) being 40 feet from the ordinaty high- water level. This decision is based on the Findings of Fact and Decision Form, w'hich contains the criteria reviewed and the Board’s findings have been attached to and incorporated as an official part of the minutes which have been placed on file with the Land & Resource Management Depailment. The variance granted shall expire five (5) years from the date of approval. The expiration date of this variance approval is July 14, i Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No A....,Copy of Application Mailed / E-Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR j CL 01122019-001 082021 km^L R Official/Date Chris LeClair DirectorOTTER TAIL COUNTY LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION WWW.CO.OTTER-TAIL.MN.US Kyle Westergard Asst. DirectorOTTURJflll GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR AVENUE FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-998-8095 FAX: 218-998-8112 Board of Adjustment Findings of Fact and Decision Applicant:David D. Sweere Address/Parcel No. 53000990778000 Requested Variance: Requesting to be 40' from the ordinary hlRh water level with a new, type 1 mound soil treatment area. Required setback is 50'. Otter Tail County Ordinance: □ Shoreland Mgmt. X Sanitation. □ Subdivision. □ WECS □ Dock & Riparian Use □ Setback Ord. Ordinance Section Citation: Table II, Section 10 A variance may be granted only where the strict enforcement of county land use controls will result in a "practical difficulty". A determination that a practical difficulty exists is based upon consideration of the following criteria: The applicant identified the following practical difficulty: Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment - Variance Question Findings 1. Is the variance in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control? (The board shall consider the purposes and intent of the official control). X Yes, the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control... □ No, the variance is NOT in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control... ...because: The property owners are replacing a failed septic system. 2. Is the property owner proposing to use the property in a reasonabie manner not permitted by the official control? (The board shall consider what reasonable use of the property is lost (practical difficulties) by the strict enforcement of the official control). X Yes, the property owner is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner... [ I No, the property owner is NOT proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner... ...because: There will be a compliant septic system installed on this property. 3. Is the need for a variance due to the circumstances unique to the property not created by the iandowner? (The board shall consider what circumstances are unique to the property, such as lot size, lot configuration, wetland, steep slope, shore impact zone, bluff, floodplain, floodway, etc. One or more should be stated on the record. What differentiates this parcel from others? Does this lot have a feature that does not affect all parcels similarly?) X Yes, the need for the variance is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner.... □ No, the need for the variance is NOT due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner... ...because: This is an existing substandard tot of record which limits the location of the system and the topography of the land also limits the location of an approved septic system. 4. Will the issuance of the variance maintain the essential character of the locality? (The board shall corisider and state for the record why the request does or does not maintain the character of the area. Is this request similar to what others have, what are near shore conditions of neighbors, similar sized or number of structures adjacent or in area, etc.) X Yes, the issuance of the variance will maintain the essential character of the locality.... □ No, the issuance of the variance will NOT maintain the essential character of the locality... .i.because: There are similar land use patterns and use of property in the vicinity of the request. 5. Does the needier the variance involve more than just economic considerations? (The board shali consider if economics played q role in the request. The fact that coming into compliance with the ordinance requirements may cost considerably more does . not. constitute a practical difficulty). X Yes, the need for the variance involves more than just economic considerations.... □ No, the issuance of the variance is only for economic considerations... ...because: The existing septic system failed and they need a new system installed in order to meet code requirements. the requested variance.The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment: APPROVES__^DENIES Complete and attach After-the-Foct Addendum if this is an After-The-Fact variance request. DATED: July 14, 2022 Board of Adjustment Chair The Board of Adjustment nriay impose conditions in the granting of variances. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. (Mitigating impervious surface with storm water management, deep rooted vegetative buffers, rain gardens, etc.) It is the Board of Adjustment's job to apply appropriate legal standards to a specific fact situation. Variances are meant to be an infrequent remedy where an-ordinance imposes a unique and substantial burden./ Charles F. Anderson & Abigail A. Smith - Continued After consideration and discussion, David Wass made a motion, seconded by Rick West with Thomas Lee voting no to approve the variance to construct a 10’ x 40’ lean-to roof to an existing building (30’ x 40’) being approximately 40’ to ordinary high-water level. This decision is based on the Findings of Fact and Decision Form, which contains the criteria reviewed and the Board’s findings have been attached to and incorporated as an official part of the minutes which have been placed on file with the Land & Resource Management Department. The variance granted shall expire five (5) years from the date of approval. The expiration date of this variance approval is July 14, 2027. Tobbie & Shelly Krueger - Variance Application Approved with Condition (7:05 p.m.) Tobbie & Shelly Krueger, Tr Called Lot 2 of Inwood Addn., Fish Lake (56-768) in Dunn Township requested the following: Requesting a 10 foot variance from the current 20 setback from the road right of way to build a detached garage 10 feet from the road right of way. Also requesting a variance from the current 25% impervious surface requirement. Proposal includes removal of 350 square feet of impervious surface, bringing the property from 32.73% to 28.48% impervious surface. Tobbie & Shelly Krueger, property owners, represented the variance application. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Russell Larson submitted an email in support of the variance request. Jeff & Rhonda Harmon submitted an email in support of the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Terry Marthaler made a motion, seconded by Rick West and carried to approve the variance to construct a detached garage being 10’ from the road right of way and reducing the impervious surface coverage to 28.48% with the condition that the structure will meet the 10’ lot line setback. This decision is based on the Findings of Fact and Decision Form, which contains the criteria reviewed and the Board’s findings have been attached to and incorporated as an official part of the minutes which have been placed on file with the Land & Resource Management Department. The variance granted shall expire five (5) years from the date of approval. The expiration date of this variance approval is July 14, 2027. Roxanne & Craig Irey-Variance Application Approved as Requested (7:12 p.m.) Roxanne & Craig Irey, A Tract of Land 75 feet in Width Being Part of GLs 2 & 3, Lida Lake (56-747) in Lida Township requested the following: We would like to build a detached garage 2 feet from road right of w ay and 55 feet from the traveled surface. The standard is 20 feet from the right of way. Craig Irey, property owner, represented the variance application. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Lida Township submitted an email in support of the variance request indicating they have no objection to the Variance. After consideration and discussion, Darren Newville made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and carried to approve the variance request to construct a detached garage being 2 feet from the road right of way and 55 feet from the traveled surface. This decision is based on the Findings of Fact and Decision Form, which contains the criteria reviewed and the Board’s findings have been attached to and incorporated as an official part of the minutes which have been placed on file with the Land & Resource Management Department. The variance granted shall expire five (5) years from the date of approval. The expiration date of this variance approval is July 14,2027. David D. Swecre - Variance Application Approved as Requested (7:24 p.m.) David D. Sweere, Lot 8 Blk I of Rainbow Point Estates, Marion Lake (56-243) in Rush Lake Township requested the following: Requesting to be 40’ from the ordinaty high water level w ith a new, type 1 mound soil treatment area. Required setback is 50’. David D. Sweere. property owner, represented the variance application. The audience was polled w ith James Lemke speaking, had a couple concerns, questioning did he "over build" on the site and is there a 2'“* site for a system that is required to have. It was determined that this variance request is not the property that Mr. Lemke was referring to. After consideration and discussion, Terry Marthaler made a motion, seconded by Rick West and carried to approve the variance to install a type 1 septic system (mound system) being 40 feet from the ordinary high-water level. This decision is based on the Findings of Fact and Decision Form, which contains the criteria reviewed and the Board’s findings have been attached to and incorporated as an official part of the minutes w hich have been placed on file with the Land & Resource Management Department. The variance granted shall expire five (5) years from the date of approval. The expiration date of this variance approval is July 14, 2027. Board of Adjustment July 14, 2022 Page I 3 STAFF REPORT APPLICANT: David D. Sweere APPLICATION: Requesting to be 40' from ordinary high-water level with a new, type I mound soil treatment area. Required setback is 50'. STAFF WHO COMPLETED REPORT: Chris LeClair Otter Tail County Visit the County Website X38690 MISTY PT Show search results for 38690 . ■f ’ WARIONLAKE 7 "1 ■ ■ , f 1 Staff Recommendation: Either approve or deny. If a motion is made to approve the application, staff recommends the following conditions be included: Applicable Ordinances/Statutes Otter Tail County Sanitation Code Table II Minimum Setback Distances (feet) Sewage Tank, Holding Tank, or Sealed Privy* Soil Treatment and Dispersal Area or Unsealed Privy* Feature Water supply well less than 50 feet deep and not encountering at least 10 feet of impervious material 50 100 Any other water supply well 50 Buried pipe distributing water under pressure________________ 10 Occupied buildings and buildings with a basement or crawl space 2010 Non-occupied structures, deck footings______________________ 1010 Top of Bluff 30 10Property Line Road Right-of-Way 10 Ordinary high water level of:** Natural Environment Lake 150 Recreational Development Lake 75 General Development Lake 50 Transition River Segments 100 Urban & Tributary River Segments 75 Agricultural River Segments 75 Staff Comments: Based on a review of the application and a site review, Staff offers the following comments: 1. If approved, include a sunset date 5 years from date of public hearing, as required in Section 3, Subp. 11 (C) of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. <t r; :.*T ES 2:S<.«®35*3Vi- ; ''*'%j«t*! **# a* P^,.. *i ■’: I. >■"» m i' if*» •1y*. rv 1 •» ** LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL Government Services Center 540 West Fir Avenue Fergus Falls, MN 56537COUNTY - MINNESOTA Notice of Hearing for Variance Applicant and/or applicant's representative must be present at the scheduled hearing. To Whom it May Concern: David D. Sweere 38690 Mistry Pt. PO Box 57 Richville MN 56576 Has/have made application to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment for a variance as per requirements of the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance, the Otter Tail County Set Back Ordinance, the Subdivision Controls Ordinance of Otter Tail County, Otter Tail County Sanitation Code and/or the Wind Energy Conversion System Ordinance of Otter Tail County. The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment will assemble for this hearing on Thursday, July 14, 2022, at 7:00 p.m. The applicant and/or applicant's agent must be present at the public hearing or participate virtually to present the application. Public comments regarding this application can be expressed by mail or emailed to landPco.ottertail.mn.us must be received by 12:00PM the day before the public hearing date. Members of the public wishing to observe and/or make comments at the public hearing may be present at the public hearing or participate virtually. A link to the virtual meeting will be provided on the Land & Resource website seven days prior to the public hearing. Individuals with questions or requiring special accommodations should contact the Land & Resource Management Office, 218-998-8095, prior to the hearing. ** Weather conditions may change the Hearing date and time. If bad weather occurs, please listen to the local Fergus Falls Radio Stations or contact the Land & Resource Management Office by 4:30 p.m. for possible rescheduling of the Hearing. The property concerned in the application is legally described and located at: Legal Description:Parcel No. - 53000990778000 Lot 8 BIk 1 of Rainbow Point Estates Section 7, Township 135, Range 39 Township Name - Rush Lake Marion Lake (56-243), General Development (GD) 38690 Misty Point, Richville MN 56576 Lake Name/Number/Class: Property Address: The variance requested is the following: Requesting to be 40' from the ordinary high water level with a new, type 1 mound soil treatment area. Required setback is 50'. Aiii} Husko Board of Adjustment Secretary June 30, 2022 ottertailcountymn.usOTTER TAIL COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER218-998-8095 ! m S"....!i Roisum LLC Septic Design and Inspection David Sweere 38690 Misty Pt 612 819 9169 dsweere@msn.com 2- bedroom dwelling 300 GPD for dwelling 24" Restrictive 392 sq ft mound 1 ft sand lift 9x28 dispersal 14x28 absorption 21 chambers for mound 3- 2" laterals 26' long, 3 ft spacing inch holes Using existing 1500/2 tank 1 bed garage Adding 1500 holding tank for garage * NOTE: Need variance for 40' setback front Marion Lake # 243 GD. Trevor Roisum 19368 Cty Hwy 24, Erhard, MN 56534 TEL I 218-849-8921 EMAIL I trevor.roisum@gmail.com ft^aflon Lake- GOff243 /\2Ci fsot Ona'ftf s^-.’5G«e .3833&r,1istyPt ■S12 81® 9159 ?S s I'.'s g re ©TO g n .C9 m 2 bsdrctim d'lWDcng 300 QP0 fof dialling 34" ResiricSife 392 sg 3 mcand 1 fl sand ilfi 9x23 dispersal 14a28 gbscrptloj! 21 cCirifflifoers for nrioun.d 3-2" lalsrsis 2S’tong, 3 fl spacing y* Isieli fteles y grag existing 1590f2 tnof! 40’tolaHe needvarianoe 3 to 1 berm towards PL (10’) 4 to 1 berm other 3 directions (12’| \ / EL= 102'ir' at top ofsBicd /Ei-rorir.n ; .gmixnd / ,3 TOiiid ctrkaco»9x28 dispersat \l4x28 absarption / Secs wcJE /\2^,14*'jf23'.J "i ^<ei||liibors <leep SV©B65'adding 1500/2 ^Deck lankIkmDeckUsing existmg /1500/2 tartk asholdi^rtank for garz^e I / o /o CMft'js e«aT^*sei.*g ta sro tacii C\rr. I CJ.-^ CTiaa^n er,»c^©fecl1?Br 2 bedroom no ©j no gd BK3iao‘“=-~-.^^ j Bt Erottsfn of pips' "0 tmougn dfiBncui pL / t \f 1 storage i sh©J I I I I 40*x40' garage with bathroom and bedroom I120’to . Pump accessi otter Tail County Web Map https://ottertailco untymn. us/ - >.-Compliance inspection report form Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS)nm 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY i !boc Type: Compliance and Enforcement instructions; Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements and attached supporting documentation - additional local requirements may also apply. Further information can be found here: https.7/www. pea, state. mn.us/sites/defaultyfiles/wa-wwists4-31a. Pdf. Inspector must submit completed form to Local Governmental Unit (LGU) and system owner within 16 days of final determination of compliance or noncompliance. Property information Local tracking number: Parcel ID# or Sec/Twp/Range: 53000990778000Local regulatory authority: Ottertail County Property address: 38690 Misty Point, Richville, MN 56576 ‘ Owner/representative: David Sweere ' Brief system description: 1000 gal, tank to 500 gal, lift tank to 600 sq.ft, ro^ trench drainfield. Owner's phone: System status System status on date (mm/dd/yyyy): 5/17/2022 □ Compliant > Certificate of compliance* (Valid for 3 years from report date unless evidence of an imminent threat to public health or safety requiring removal and abatement under section 145A. 04, subdivision 8 is discovered or a shorter time frame exists in Local Ordinance.) *Note: Compliance indicates conformance with Minn. R. 7080.1BO0 as of sysfom status date above and does not guarantee future performance. Reason(s) for noncompliance (check ail applicable) n Impact on public health (Compliance component #1) - Imminent threat to public health and safety n Tank integrity (Compliance component #2) - Failing to protect groundwater □ Other Compliance Conditions (Compliance component #3) - Imminent threat to public health and safety Q other Compliance Condrtions (Compliance component #3) - Failing to protect groundwater □ System not abandoned according to Minn, R. 7080.2500 (Compliance component #3) - Failing to protect groundwater I3 Soil separation (Compliance component #5) - Failing to protect groundwater □ Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements (Compliance component #4) - Noncompliant - local ordinance applies Comments or recommendations ^ Noncompliant - Notice of noncompliance An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance or under section 145A. 04 subdivision 8. Systems failing to protect ground water must be upgraded, replaced, or use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. Certification thereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. By typing my name below. I certify the above st^^eipents to be true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and that this information can be used for the purpose of processing this h Business name: Stoll Inspections Inc. Inspector signature: ___/ Certification number: 7526 License number; 2982 i (This document has been electronically signed) \ Necessary or locally required supporting documentation (must be attached) Phone: 218-839-1849 □ Operating PermitSoil observation logs G Other information (list): [3 Locally required forms □ Tank Integrity Assessment 8(X)-e57-3Se4 • Use yoiir preferred relay service • Available in alternative formats Page (of 4 https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq.\A/\A/isis4-31b • 1/11/21 • 651-296-6300: 1. Impact on public health - Compliance component #1 of 5 Compliance criteria:_______ System discharges sewage to the ground surface Attached supporting documentation: Q Other: _____________________ □ Not applicable □ Yes' [3 No □ Yes’ S NoSystem discharges sewage to drain tile or surface waters. System causes sewage backup into □ Yes’ 0 No dwelling, or establishment.____________________ Any "yes" answer above indicates the system is an imminent threat to public health and safety. Describe verification methods and results: 2. Tank integrity - Compliance component #2 of 5 Attached supporting documentation: □ Pumped at time of inspection Compliance criteria: □ Yes' El NoSystem consists of a seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, or other pit?_______________Haw^ SepticName of maintenance business; □ Yes' B NoSewage tank(s) leak below their designed operating depth? License number of maintenance business: L3466 5/16/2022Date of maintenance: □ Existing tank integrity assessment (Attach) Date of maintenance (mmy'dd/yyyy);(must be within three years) (See form instructions to ensure assessment complies with Minn. R. 7082.0700 subp. 4 B (1)) □ Tank is .Noncompliant (pumping not necessary - explain below) □ Other: Tank Empty_______________________ If yes, which sewage tank(s) leaks: Any “yes" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methods and results: https://www.pca.state.mn.us wq-wwisti4-31b • 1/11/21 Use your preferred relay service' • Available in alternative formats Page 2 ofi 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 3. Other compliance conditions - Compliance component #3 of 5 3a. Maintenance hole covers appear to be structurally unsound (damaged, cracked, etc.), or unsecured? D Yes' El No n Unknown 3b. Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety? □ Yes' 13 No □ Unknown * Yes fo 3a or 3b - System is an imminent threat to public health and safety. 3c. System is non-protectiye of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector? 3d. System not abandoned in accordance with Minn. R. 7080.2500? * Yes fo 3c or 3d - System is failing to protect groundwater Describe verification methods and results; □ Yes' S No □ Yes' 0 No Attached supporting documentation: □ Not applicable □ 4, Operating permit and nitrogen BMP* - Compliance component #4 of 5 ^ Not applicable □ Yes □ No It “yes”, A below is requiredIs the system operated under an Operating Permit? Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP specified in the system design? □ Yes □ No If “yes”, B below is required BMP - Bast Management Practice(s) specified in the system design If the answer to both questions Is “no”, this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria; a. Have the operating pennit requirements been met? b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? □ Yes □ No Any “no” answer indicates noncompliance. Describe verification methods and results: □ Yes □ No Attached supporting documentation: □ Operating permit (Attach) □ Use your preferred relay service • Available in aliernalive formats Page 3 of 4 hUps://www.pcajtate.mn.u5 wq-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 800-657-3864651-296-6300 5. Soil separation - Compliance component #5 of 5 □ UnknownDate of instal lation 8/20/1996 (mnVdd/yyyy) Shoreland/Wellhead protectlon/Food beverage lodging? S Yes n No Attached supporting documentation; S Soil observation logs completed for the report (Attach) n Two previous verifications of required vertical separation (Attach) □ Not applicable (No soil treatment area) Compliance criteria (select one): 5a. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and not located in Shorelend or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainiield has at least a two-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. n Yes □ No* □ □ Yes S No*5b. Non-performance systems built April 1, 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located In Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodicaliy saturated soil or bedrock.* Indicate depths or elevations A. Bottom of distribution media 30" B. Periodically, saturated soil/bedrock 32" C. System separation Z' iD. Required compliance separation* 36" *May be reduced up to 15 percent if ailowed by Local Ordinance. 5c. '‘Experimental", “Other", or "Performance" □ Yes Q No* systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type IVorV systems built under 2008 Rules 7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock 'Any “no" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. Describe verification methbds and results: Tificnl ____J_____ 1^"iliil 4 upgrade requirements: (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to prefect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or Its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as defined in law. and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas. Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connedion with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. ii.«» ynur prpfQrred rplav ^prvice • Available in alternative formats Page A ofi htlp£i//w'«w.pea.et9te.mn.us wg-wwists4-31b • 1/11/21 e;i.20E^300 • gGO-EE7-386A Parcel Number: ?'?Q77yoCrO Date & Initial;_P3S ^ System Drawing Hie system drawing which includes.and identities a graphic scale jn feet or. indicates all setback distances, all septic/holding/tifl tanks, draintieids, wells within 100 feet of system (indicate depth of wejisj, dwelling and non-dwelling staictures,' lot lines, road right-of-ways, easements. OHWls, wetlands, and topographic features (i.e. Wuffsj. 1 \ \ \ \ 3 Q\ I IL\ \ \ \\ \ \Additional Comments: ExceVCompliance Foimfcr OTC 4/14/2017 Page 2 of 2 V- I UK lx's nil TV QT Ml If VEMTaOnsite Sewage . MINNESOTA POLLUTIONI CONTROL AGENCYTreatmentI . ‘ Program t-■Design Summary Page 1. PROJECT INFORMATION V 04.01.2021 Property Owner/Client: David Sweere Project ID: Site Address: 38690 MISTY PT RICHVILLE, MN 56576-0000 06/16/22Date: Email Address: dsweerecgmsn.com 612-819-9169Phone: 2. DESIGN FLOW & WASTE STRENGTH Attach data / estimate basis for Other Establishments 300Design Flow:GPD Anticipated Waste Type:Residential <170BOD:<60 <25mg/L TSS:mg/L Oil & Grease:mg/L CTreatment Level:Select Treatment Level C for residential septic tank effluent 3. HOLDING TANK SIZING '; -•Minimum Capacity: Residential =400 gal/bedroom, Other Establishment = Design Flow x 5.0, Minimum size 1000 gallons Code Minimum Holding Tank Capacity: Recommended Holding Tank Capacity: 1500 Gallons 1 Tanks or Compartments Tanks or Compartments (Set @ 75% tank capacity) in 1500 Gallons 1in Type of High Level Alarm: Irifiltrator 1500 for garage with bathroom and bedroomComments: 4. SEPTIC TANK SIZING A. Residential dwellings: Number of Bedrooms (Residential): Code Minimum Septic Tank Capacity: Recommended Septic Tarik Capacity: 2 1000 Gallons 1 Tanks or Compartments Tanks or Compartments in 1000 Gallons 1in Effluent Screen & Alarm (Y/N):Exisitng Lampy 1500/2Model/Type: B. Other Establishments: [Days Hyd. Retention Time Tanks or Compartments Tanks or Compartments Waste received by: Code Minimum Septic Tank Capacity: Recommended Septic Tank Capacity: GPDx Gallons In Gallons In Effluent Screen & Alarm (Y/N):Model/Type: 5. PUMP TANK SIZING 500Pump Tank 1 Capacity (Minimum): Pump Tank 1 Capacity (Recommended): Gal Pump Tank 2 Capacity (Minimum):Gal 500 Gal Pump Tank 2 Capacity (Recommended):Gal Pump 1 20.0 GPM Total Head Supply Pipe Dia. | 2.00 in Dose Vol: 13.4 ft Supply Pipe Dia. Pump 2 GPM Total Head ft 60.0 gal Dose Vol:Gal Ui^ivE««irvoF MuveaouOnsite Sewage Treatment Program MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY •; . Design Summary Page 6. SYSTEM AND DISTRIBUTION TYPE Project ID; ■iMoundSoil Treatment Type;Pressure Distribution-LevelDistribution Type; Bottom of outlert pipe at houseElevation Benchmark;100 ft Benchmark Location; Type IMPCA System Type; Type lll/IV/V Details; Registered Product;Distribution Media; ; 7. SITE EVALUATION SUAAMARY: Describe Limiting Condition; Redoximorphic Features/Saturated Soils Layers with >35% Rock Fragments? (yes/no)f No | If yes, describe below; % rock and layer thickness, amount of soil credit and any additional information for addressing the rock fragments in this design. Note; Depth Depth Elevation of Limiting Condition 24Limiting Condition;inches 2.0 ft ft 36Minimum Req’d Separation;inches Critical for system compliance3.0 ft Elevation Code Max System Depth; Mound inches This is the maximimum depth to the bottom of the distribution media for required separation. Negative Depth (ft) means it must-be a mound. -1.0 ft . ft Medium Sandy LoamSoil Texture; GPD/ft^0.78Soil Hyd. Loading Rate;Percolation Rate;MPI Contour Loading Rate; Measured Land Slope; 11 Note; 1 %Note; Comments; 8. SOIL TREATMENT AREA DESIGN SUMAAARY Trench: ft^ Sidewall DepthDispersal Area Trench Width ftin Code Max. Trench Depth ft Designed Trench Depth Total Lineal Feet ft No. of Trenches in Contour Loading Rate ft Minimum Length in Bed: ft^ Sidewall Depth Bed Length Dispersal Area Maximum Bed Depthin in Bed Width ft ft Designed Bed Depth in Mound: ft^252.0 28.0 0.0Dispersal Area Absorption Width Bed: Length ft Bed Width ft 13.5 1.0 12.0ftClean Sand Lift ft Berm Width (0-1%)ft 12.0 12.0 12.0Upslope.Berm Width Total System Length ft Downslope Berm ft Endslope Berm Width Contour Loading Rate ft 52.0 33.0 10.8ftSystem Width ft gal/ft UklVEISIH' OF MnlNEMMOnsite .Sevvage Treatment . •Program A POLLUTIONAGENCYDesign Summary Page Project ID: At-Grade: Bed Width ft Bed Length ft Finished Height ft Contour Loading Rate Endslope Berm gal/ft Upslope Berm ftftDownslope Berm ft ftSystem Length ft ,System Width Level & Equal Pressure Distribution No. of Laterals 3 3Perforation Spacing ft 1/4Perforation Diameter in Lateral Diameter 2.00 53 75in Min Dose Volume gal Max Dose Volume gal Non-Level and Unequal Pressure Distribution PipeElevationPipe Size Perf SizePipe Spacing SpacingVolume (gal/ft)(ft)Length (ft) (ft)(in) (in) (in)Minimum Dose VolumeLateral 1 Lateral 2 gal Lateral 3 Lateral 4 Maximum Dose VolumeLateral 5 Lateral 6 gal 9. Additional Info for At-Risk, HSW or Type IV Design A. Starting BOD Concentration = Design Flow X Starting BOD (mg/L) X 8.35 t 1,000,000 igpd X mg/L X 8.35-r 1,000,00' =lbs. BOD/day B. Target BOD Concentration = Design Flow X Target BOD (mg/L) X 8.35 -5- 1,000,000 Igpd X mg/L X 8.35 V 1,000,00' =lbs. BOD/day Lbs. BOD To Be Removed: PreTreatment Technology: Disinfection Technology: C. Organic Loading to Soil Treatment Area: ‘Must Meet or Exceed Target ‘Required for Levels A & B Ibs./day/ft^ft^mg/L X gpd X 8.35 V 1,000,000-r r: 10. Comments/Special Design Considerations:• ^ ^5 I hereby certify that | have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. /.jA^9STrevor Roisum 4095 bmnon V,; (Designer)(Signature)(License #)(Date) - t'MVkBtirt 0> MKi^BJUIA Mound Design Worksheet <1% Slope Onsite jfjpn Sewage TrEATMENtI'; •;? Program *'■ V" MINNESOTA POLLUTIONI I ■ L) CONTROL AGENCY A ' ■ 1. SYSTEM SIZING:Project ID:V 04.01.2021 TABLE IXaGPD300A. Design Row : LOADING RATES.FOR DETERMINING BOTTOM ABSORPTION AREA AND ABSORPTION RATIOS USING PERCOLATION TESTSGPD/ft^B. Soil Loading Rate:0.78 Treatment Level C Treatment Level A, A-2, B, C. Depth to Limiting Condition:2.0 ft Absorption Area Loading Absorption Area LoadingPercolation Rate (MPI) Mound Absorption Ratio Mound iUrsorption RatioRateRate1.0D. Percent Land Slope:%(Hid/ft')(fflxIAt') 21.2E. Design Media Loading Rate:«0.1 1 1GPD/ft : 0.1 to 5 1.2 1 l.fi 1 F. Mound Absorption Ratio:1.50 0.1 to 5 (fine sand and loanny fine sand) 10.6 2 1.6 " Table I MOUND CONTOUR LOADING RATES: 6 to 15 0.78 1.6 1 1.6 0.616 to 30 2 0.78 2 0.782.431 to 45 0.5 2Contour Loading Rate: Measured Perc Rate Texture - derived mound absorption ratio 0.60.4646 to 60 2.6 2.6OR 61 to 120 5 0.3 6.3 >120i GOmpi 1.0. T.3. 2.0, 2.4, 2.6 <12 ‘Systems with these values are not Type I systems. Contour Loading Rate (linear loading rate) is a recommended value. 61-120 mpi OR 5.0 <12 > 120 mpi*>5.0*<6* 2. DISPERSAL MEDIA SIZING A. Calculate Dispersal Bed Area; Design Flow (1.A) t Design Media Loading Rate ^300 IgPD t 2 250 ft^1.2 GPD/ft" = ft^If a larger dispersal media area is desired, enter size:250 9 ft Can not exceed 10 feet. C. Calculate Contour Loading Rate: Bed Width X Design Media Loading Rate 10.8 gal/ft D. Calculate Minimum Dispersal Bed Length; Dispersal Bed Area t Bed Width 9 Ift = 27.8 Ift B. Enter Dispersal Bed Width: ft^ X9 1.2 Can not exceed Table 1GPD/fr = ft^ -r250 If a larger dispersal media Length is desired, enter size;28 ft 3. ABSORPTION AREA SIZING A. Calculate Absorption Width: Bed Width X Mound Absorption Ratio 9.0 Ift X 1.5 13.5 ft B. For slopes from 0 to 1%, the Absorption Width is measured from the bed equally in both directions. Absorption Width Beyond the Bed: Absorption Width - Bed Width -5- 2 9^0 Ift) V 213.5 ft 2.3(ft 4. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA Project ID: Select Dispersal Media: Registered Product: A. Rock Depth Below Distribution Pipe Enter Either A. or B. in B. Registered Media 0 Check resistered product information for specific application details and desisnRegistered Media Depth Specific Media Comments: 12 in 6. MOUND SIZING A. Clean Sand Lift: Required Separation - Depth to Limiting Condition = Clean Sand Lift (1 ft minimum) 2.03.0 ft 1.0ft =ft Design Sand Lift (optional):1.0 ft B. Upslope Height = Clean Sand Lift + Depth of Media + Depth to Cover Pipe + Depth of Cover (1 ft) ft +ft +1.0 ft +ft =1.00 1.00 3.0 ft C. Berm Width = Upslope Mound Height X 4 (4 is recommended, but could be 3-12) ftX3.0 ft =4.0 12.0 ft D. Total Landscape Width = Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Width + Berm Width 9.0ft +12.0 ft +ft =12.0 33.0 ft E. Additional Berm Width necessary for absorption - Absorption Width - Total Landscape Width 0 ft if number is negative (<0), value is ZERO33.0ft -ft =13.5 F. Final Berm Width = Additional Berm Width + Berm Width ft +0 ft = 12.012.0 ft G. Total Mound Width = Final Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Width + Final Berm Width ft +i'ft +12.0 9.0 ft =12.0 33.0 ft H. Total Mound Length = Final Berm Width + Dispersal Bed Length + Final Berm Width ft +ft +12.0 ft =28.0 12.0 52.0 ft I. Setbacks from the Bed: Absorption Width - Dispersal Bed Width divided by 2 (I ils I ft - I 9j0 I) / 2 2.3 ft ' 7. MOUND DIMENSIONS (Feet)Project ID: orsj -UfisLQpe............ N/f N t . -C I I IT3EndsippeHEnd^lopeDispersal BedI J.I9X28.0T T3 Ai^c:>C 4-I IDistribution Area 252 ft2I t I I )I I ca s y o \/N y O Downsloper>i 52.0 .. /Total Mound Length 4" inspection pipe 18"cover on top //7/7 7 12.0 12.0 Upslope berm Downslope berm V T» r% 1.0 Clean sand lift (6.A) Depth to Limiting Limiting Condition f 7 7 13.5 Absorption Width Required Separation 36 (in)Distribution Media 0 Manifold Connection End Media Depth 12.0 (in) 1/4 |(in)36.0 |(in)Perforation Size:Perforation Spacing: If Split and Non-Level Pressure Distribution Used: See Non-Level Pressure Distribution Form Comments: L'mvlhsii Y u» MikxcsdtaOnsite Sewage ■Treatment , Program _ _ MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 0--4 Mound Materials Worksheet Project ID:V 04.01.2021 A. Rock Volume: (Rock Below Pipe + Rock to cover pipe {pipe outside dia + -2 inch)) X Bed Lensth X Bed Width = Volume ft^'V in ) T 12 X |. 27.8 Divide ft^ by 27 ftVyd^ to calculate cubic yards: Add 30% for constructability: ftin +9.0ft X yd'ft' ^ 27 yd'yd'X 1.3 B. Calculate Clean Sand Volume: Volume Under Rock bed: Average Sand Depth x Media Width x Media Length = cubic feet ft X ft X ft'1.0 9.0 28 252ft = For a Mound on a slope from 0-1% Volume from Length = ((Upslope Mound.Height - 1j X Absorption V/idth Beyond Bed X Media Bed Length) 3.00 ~|ft-1) X 2.25 28 ft 126.0Xrr Volume from V/idth = ((Upslope Mound Height - 1) X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bed Width) 3.00 ~|ft -.1) X total Clean Sand Volume : Volume from Length + Volume from Width Volume Under Media 126.0 ft' + 40l ft' + 252.0 ft^ = 418.5 Ift' 2.25 9 40.5Xft For a Mound on a slope greater than 1% Upslope Volume: {{Upslope Mound Height - 7) x 3 x Bed Length) -^ 2 = cubic feet ft - 1) X 3.0 ft ft'. ((X )-2=[___ Downslope Volume: {{Downslope Height • 1) x Downslope Absorption Width x Media Length ) -^ 2 = cubic feet ft X I Endslope Volume : {Downslope Mound Height ■ 1) x 3 x Media Width = cubic feet ft - 1 ) X 3.0 ft ft'((f t - 1) X )^2 = ft'X(ft = Total Clean Sand Volurpe : Upslope Volume + Downslope Volume + Endslope Volume + Volume Under Media ft' +ft'ft' +ft' +ft' = Divide ft' by 27 ft'/yd' to calculate cubic yards: Add 30% for constructability: ft' -r 27 yd'X 1.3 yd'418.5 15.5 yd'15.5 20.2 C. Calculate Sandy Berm Volurhe:i Total Berm Volume (approx): ((Avg. Mound Height - 0.5 ft topsoil) x Mound Width x Mound Length) -?• 2 0.5 )ft X 33.0 Ift X ) -i- 2 = 2145.0 ft'3.0 52.0( Total Mound Volurrie - Clean Sand volume -Rock Volume = cubic feet ft' - Divide ft' by 27 ft'/yd' to calculate cubic yards: Add 30% for constructability: ft' -ft' = 1726.5 ft'2145.0 418.5 ft' T 27 yd' X yd'1726.5 63.9 yd'63.9 83.11.3 D. Calculate Topsoil Material Volume: Total Mound Width X Total Mound Length X .5 ft 52.0 |ft X 0.5 ft 858^0 ft' - 27 yd' X 858.0 ft'33.0 ft X Divide ft' by 27 ft'/yd' to calculate cubic yards: Add 30% for constructability: yd'31.8 yd'31.8 41.31.3 VkHIJIT Pressure Distribution Design Worksheet Onsitc SCWAGC Treatment Program rm MINNESOTA POLLUTIONCONTROL AGENCY Project ID:V 04.01.2021 1. Media Bed Width:9 ft 2. Minimum Number of Laterals in system/zone = Rounded up number of [(Media Bed Width - 4) -r 3] + 1. 9 - 4) O] + 1 =3[(Does not apply to at-gradeslaterals 3. Designer Selected Number o/ Laterals: Cannot be less than line 2 (Except in at-vrades) 4. Select Perforation Spacing : 3 laterals 3.00 ft v.„,5. Select Perforation Diameter Size: 6. Length of Laterals = Media Bed Length - 2 Feet. 1/4 in Ia- oirwb , ywiri. >' »n r 28.0 26.02ft ft Perforation can not be closer then 1 foot from edge. 7. Determine the Number of Perforation Spaces . Divide the Length of Laterals by the Perforation Spacing and round down to the nearest whole number. 26.0 3.0 ft 8Number of Perforation Spaces =ft Spaces 8. Number of Perforations per Lateral is equal to 1.0 plus the Number of Perforation Spaces . Check table below to verify the number of perforations per lateral guarantees less than a 10% discharge variation. The value is double with a center manifold. ■f Perforations Per Lateral =8 9Spaces + 1 =Perfs. Per Lateral Muimm Number of Perforations Per Lateral to Guarantee < 10X Uscharge Variation V4 Inch Perforations 7/32 Inch Perforations Pipe Diameter (Inches)Pipe Kameter (Inches)Perforation SpacingPerforation Spacing (Feet)(Feet)1 lli 2 3 2 3I1Um 2 2 11 21 6816341013 18 30 60 2»2W812285416 10 20 3214 64 3 3 9 14 19 30 608 12 16 25 52 3/16 Inch Perforatkms 1/8 Inch Perforations Pipe Diameter (Inches)Pipe Diameter (Inches)Perforation SpacingPerforation Spacing (Feet)(Feet)I 1W m 2 3 116 2 311» 2 12 18 26 87 2 21 33 7446 14944 211 2H121724 40 80 20 30 69 13541 3 3121622 37 75 20 29 38 12864 9. Total Number of Perforations equals the Number of Perforations per Lateral multiplied by the Number 0/ Perforated Laterals. 9 3Perf. Per Lat. X 27Number of Perf. Lat. =Total Number of Perf. Spacing of laterals; Must be greater than 1 foot and no more than 3 feet:10.2.3 ft 11. Select Type of Manifold Connection (End or Center):End 12. Select Lateral Diameter (See Table):2.00 in L»I«UIII> W Ul^KUVUOnSITI: Sewage T REATMENTProgram Pressure Distribution Design Worksheet MINNeSOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCYmu Pgrfbntloi DMiirp |0P«|13. Calculate the Square Feet per Perforation. Recommended value is 4-11 ft2 per perforation, Does not apply to At-Grades a. Bed Area = Bed Width (ft) X Bed Length (ft) PBrlontiOT DUineter HMd (ft)V„V,V, 1.0*0.18 0.41 O.U 0.74 ft^9 28ft X ft =252 0.69 0.90.22 0.S11.5 2.0^0.26 0.59 ^0.80 1.04 b. Square Foot per Perforation = Bed Area t by the Total Number of Perfs ft^/perf 1.172.5 0.29 0.65 ,0.89 3.0 1.280.32 0.72 0.98 ft^•-1.132524.0 0.37 0.83 1.47279.3perf =TF 0.41 0.93 1.26 1.65 Owelllngi with 3/16 inch to 1/4 inch perforations1.014. Select Minimum Averase Head:ft I foot Owellinss with 1 /8 inch perforations0.7415. Seiect Perforation Discharge based on Table:GPM per Perf 2(m Other etablishnpts and MSTSwiih 3/16 inch to i/4 Inch perforations 16.Flow Rate = Total Number of Perfs X Perforation Discharge.Other establbhments and MSTS with 1 /$ Inch perforatbns5 feet 27 0.74Perfs X 20GPM per Perforation =GPM 17. Volume of Liquid Per Foot of Distribution Piping (Table II):0.170 Gallons/ft 18. Volume of Distribution Piping = = [Number of Perforated Laterals X Length of Laterals X (Volume of Liquid Per Foot of Distribution Piping] Table II Volutne.of Liquid In Liquid, Per Foot (Gallons) Pipe Diameter (inches) 13.3ft X326 0.170X gal/ft Gallons 19. Minimum Delivered Volume = Volume of Distribution Piping X 4 0.0451 1.25 0.078 13.3 gals X 4 =53.0 Gallons 0.1101.5 2 0.170 3 0.380 4 0.661 Comments/Special Design Considerations: ONSITii SeWAOE I ' I X TnnATMEHTl,’! . PnocnAM «- Pump Tank Design Worksheet (Demand Dose)MINNEIOTA POLLUTION■ I I U CONTROL AGENCY DETERMINE TANK CAPACITY AND DIMENSIONS V 04.01.2021Project ID: 3001.A. Design Flow (Desisn Sum. lA):C. Tank Use:DosingGPD Gal'D. Recommended pump tank capacity:B. Min. required pump tank capacity:500 Gal 500 1 using existing tank2.A. Tank Manufacturer:Lampy 1500/2B. Tank Model: Note: Desisn calculations are based on this specific tank. Substitutins a different tank model will change the pump float or timer settings. Contact designer if changes are necessary. Capacity from manufacturer:500C.Gallons D. Gallons per inch from manufacturer:'12.0 Gallons per inch E. Liquid depth of tank from manufacturer:42.0 inches DETERMINE DOSING VOLUME 3 Calculate Volume to Cover Pump (The inlet of the pump must be at least 4-inches from the bottom of the pump tank ft 2 inches of water covering the pump is recommended) (Pump and block height + 2 inches) X Gallons Per Inch in -r 2 inches) X 4 Minimum Delivered Volume = 4 X Volume of Distribution Piping: -Item 18 of the Pressure Distribution or Item 11 of Non-level 5 Calculate Maximum Pumpout Volume (25% of Design Flow) GPD 12 12.0 168(Gallons Per Inch Gallons 53 Gallons (Minimum dose)4.4 inches/dose 300 X 0.25Design Flow:75 6.3Gallons (Maximum dose)inches/dose 6 Select a pumpout volume that meets both Minimum and Maximum: 7 Calculate Doses Per Day = Design Flow t Delivered Volume 60 Gallons Volume of Liquid in Pipe ^gpd F gal =300 60 5.00 Doses Liquid Per Foot: (Gallons)I Pipe Diameter (inches) 8- Calculate Drainback: 2A.Diameter of Supply Pipe -inches ;32B.Length of Supply Pipe =feet 0.0451 0.0781.25Volume of Liquid Per Lineal Foot of Pipe = Drainback = Length of Supply Pipe X Volume of Liquid Per Lineal Foot of Pipe 0.170C.Gallons/ft 1.5 0.110D. 2 0.17032ft X 0.170 gal/ft =5.4 Gallons 3 0.3809. Total Dosing Volume = Delivered Volume plus Drainback :■ 0.661460gal +5.4 gal =65 Gallons 10. Minimum Alarm Volume = Depth of alarm (2 or 3 inches) X gallons per inch of tank 3 in X 12.0 gal/in =36.0 Gallons DEMAND DOSE FLOAT SETTINGS 11. Calculate Float Separation Distance using Dosing Volume . Total Dosing Volume /Gallons Per Inch gal r65 12.0 gal/in =5.5 Inches 12. Measuring from bottom of tank: A. Distance to set Pump Off Float = Pump + block height + 2 inches in + 2 in = TLInches for Dose:5.5 in 12 14 Inches 22.5Alarm Depth Pump On Pump Off B. Distance to set Pump On Float=Distance to Set Pump-Off Float + Float Separation Distance in + 19.5 in 36.0 Gal 14 5.5 in =19 Inches 14.0 in 65 Gal sC. Distance to set Alarm Float = Distance to set Pump-On Float + Alarm Depth (2-3 inches) in + 168 Gal 19 3.0 in =22 Inches Onsite Sewage Treatment Program m MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCYBasic Pump Selection Design Worksheet 1. PUMP CAPACITY V 04.01.2021Project ID: Pumping to Gravity or Pressure Distribution:Pressure A. If pumping to gravity enter the gallon per minute of the pump:GPM (10-45spm) B. If pumping to a pressurized distribution system:20.0 GPM C. Enter pump description:Demand Dosing Soil treatment tystem & point of discharge2. HEAD REQUIREMENTS A. Elevation Difference between pump and point of discharge: 8 ft nJet pipe Uon » enceB. Distribution Head Loss:5 ft C. Additional Head Loss:ft (due to special equipment, etc.) Table I.Friction Loss In Plastic Pipe per 100ft Distribution Head Loss Pipe Diameter (inches)Flow Rate (GPM)Gravity Distribution = Oft 1.25 1.51 2 Pressure Distribution based on Minimum Average Head Value on Pressure Distribution Worksheet: 3.1 1.3 0.3109.1 12.8 4.3 1.8 0.412 Minimum Average Head Distribution Head Loss 17.0 5.7 2.4 0.6141ft 5ft 21.8 7.3 3.0 0.7162ft6ft9.1 3.8 0.9185ftlOft2011.1 4.6 1.1 25 16.8 6.9 1.7 23.5 9.730 2.4D. 1. Supply Pipe Diameter:2.0 in 35 12.9 3.2 2. Supply Pipe Length:32 ft 16.540 4.1 45 20.5 5.0 E. Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe per 100ft from Table I:50 6.1 55 7.31.12 ft per 100ft of pipeFriction Loss =8.660 F. Determine Equivalent Pipe Length from pump discharge to soil dispersal area discharge point. Estimate by adding 25% to supply pipe length for fitting loss. Supply Pipe Length X 1.25 = Equivalent Pipe Length 65 10.0 70 11.4 75 13.0 85 16.43240.0ftX 1.25 ft 95 20.1 G. Calculate Supply Friction Loss by multiplying Friction Loss Per 100ft by the Equivalent Pipe Length and divide by 100. Supply Friction Loss = 1.12 40.0ft per 100ft 0.4Xft ft100 H. Total Head requirement is the sum of the Elevation Difference + Distribution Head Loss, + Additional Head Loss + Supply Friction Loss 8.0 5.0 0.4 13.4ftftft +ft =ft++ 3. PUMP SELECTION 20.0 13.4A pump must be selected to deliver at least GPM with at least feet of total head. Comments: I» MU Preliminary Evaluation Worksheet Onsite ' Sewage rm MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY5^ 1. Contact Information V 04.01,2021 Property Owner/Client: David Sweere Date Completed:6/9/2022 Site Address: 38690 MISTY PT RICHVILLE, MN 56576-0000 Project ID: -Email: dsweere@msh.com Phone: 612-819-9169 Mailing Address: PO BOX 163 PERHAM, MN 56573-0163 USA Alt Phone: Legal Description: LOT 8 BK 1 Parcel ID: 53-000-99-0778-000 07 TWP: 135 RNG:039SEC: 2. Flow and General System Information A. Client-Provided Information Project Type: Q New Construction 0 Replacement Project Use: 0 Residential 0 Other Establishment; 0 Expansion I I Repair Residential use: # Bedrooms:2 Dwelling Sq.ft.:Unfinished Sq. Ft.: # Adults:1 # Children:# Teenagers: In-home business (Y/N):.No If yes, describe: 0 Garbage Disposal/Grinder 0 Dishwasher Water-using devices: Q Sewage pump in basement 0 Water Softener* (check alt that apply) 0 Large Bathtub >40 gallons 0 Iron Filter* 1 I Clothes Washing Machine 0 High Eff. Furnace* 0 Hot Tub* 1 I Sump Pump* 0 Self-Cleaning Humidifier* 1 I Other: * Clear water source - should not go into system , Additional current or future uses: Anticipated non-domestic waste: The above is complete & accurate: Client signature & date B. Designer-determined flow Information Attach additional information as necessary. Design Flow:300 GPD ResidentialAnticipated Waste Type: <170BOD:<60 Oil & Grease <25mg/L TSS mg/L mg/L 3. Preliminary Site Information A. Water Supply Wells Well Depth Casing Depth (ft.) Confining Layer STA # .Description Mn. ID#(ft.)Setback Source Deep well1 2 3 4 Additional Well Information: Preliminary Evaluation Worksheet OnsiteSewage Treatment^/. . ^Program I =• ^ MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Site within 200' of noncommunity transient well (Y/N) Site within a drinking water supply management area (Y/N) No Yes, source: No Yes, source:! Site in Well Head Protection inner wellhead management zone (Y/N)No Yes, source: Buried water supply pipes within 50 ft of proposed system (Y/N)No B. Site located in a shoreland district/area?Yes MarionYes, name: Elevation of ordinary high water level:ft Source: Classification:GD ft.Tank Setback:ft. STA Setbk: No N/AC. Site located in a floodplain?Yes, Type(s): N/A N/AFloodplain designation/elevation (10 Year):ft Source: N/AFloodplain designation/elevation (100 Year): D. Property Line Id / Source: [T] Owner Q Survey 0 County CIS | | Plat Map I I Other: E. ID distance of relevant setbacks on map: □ water □ Easements □well(s) n Building(s) Q] Property Lines Q OHWL Q Other: N/A ft Source: 4. Preliminary Soil Profile Information From Web Soil Survey (attach map & description) Map Units: 1120 Slope Range:%na List landforms: hillslopes Landform position(s): Summit i Parent materials: Depth to Bedrock/Restrictive Feature:Depth to Watertable:inin Septic Tank Absorption Field- At-grade: Moderately Limited Map Unit Ratings Septic Tank Absorption Field- Mound:Not Limited Septic Tank Absorption Field- Trench: Extremely Limited 5. Local Government Unit Information Name of LGU LGU Contact LGU-specific setbacks LGU-specific design requirements LGU-specific installation requirements: Notes: ur Field Evaluation Worksheet Onsite Sewage i MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Kr 1. Project Information V 04.01.2021 Property Owner/Client: David Sweere Project ID: Site Address: 38690 MISTY PT RICHVILLE, MN 56576-0000 Date Completed:6/16/2022 2. Utility and Structure Information Utility Locations Identified D Gopher State One Call #I I Any Private Utilities: I I Existing Buildings Q Improvements Q] SetbacksI I EasementsLocate and Verify (see Site Evaluation map ) 3. Site Information Vegetation type(s):Lawn SummitLandscape position: Percent slope:1 Slope shape: Linear, Linear Slope direction:north% I Describe the flooding or run-on potential of site: Describe the need for Type III or Type IV system: Note: Proposed soil treatment area protected? (Y/N):flaggedYesIf yes, describe: 4. General Soils Information Filled, Compacted, Disturbed areas (Y/N):No If yes, describe: Soil observations were conducted in the proposed system location (Y/N):Yes A soil observation in the most limiting area of the proposed system (Y/N):Yes Number of soil observations:3 Soil observation logs attached (Y/N):Yes Percolation tests performed 6t attached (Y/N):No ; 5. Phase I. Reporting Information Depth Elevation Limiting Condition*: Periodically saturated soil: Standing water: Bedrock: Benchmark Elevation: 24 in ft *Most Restrictive Depth Identified from List Below Soil Texture: Medium Sandy Loam Percolation Rate: ft Soil Hyd Loading Rate: 0.78 Elevations and Benchmark on map? (Y/N): 24 in ft in ftna min/inch gpd/ft^inna 100.0 ft Yes Benchmark Elevation Location: Bottom of outlert pipe at house Differences between soil survey and field evaluation: Site evaluation issues / comments: Anticipated construction issues: L> ivuiirr or Mikmuctu Onsite ,Sewage fTreatment Program Soil Observation Log Project ID:*T5-V 04.01.2021 David SweereClient:Location / Address:38690 MISTY PT RICHVILLE, MN 56576-0000 Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)I I Outwash Q Lacustrine Q Loess Q Till I I Alluvium I I Bedrock Q Organic Matter Elevation-relative to ________benchmark:Landscape Position: (select one)Slope shape Linear, LinearSummitSlope %: 1.0 T ' Lawn Soil survey map units:Vegetation:1120 Limiting Layer Elevation: Weather Conditions/Time of Day:06/14/22pm cloudy Date Observation #/Location:#1 Observation. Type:Auger I Structure—-Rock IDepth (in)Redox Kind(s)Texture Matrix Color(s)Mottle Color(s)Indicator(s)Frag. %Shape ConsistenceGrade 10YR 2/2Medium Sandy Loam0-13 <5 Blocky Weak Friable 10YR 5/3Sandy Clay Loam13-28 <5 Blocky Weak Friable 10YR 4/310YR 5/3 Concentrations SISandy Clay Loam28 <5 Blocky Weak Friable 10YR 7/2 Depletions Comments restrictive 24" I hereby.certifyjhatLhave^completed.this work.,in.accordance-with alLapplicable.ordinances, rules.and laws. Trevor Roisum J^O^S 4095 6/14/2022 (Designer/lnspector)(Signature)(License #)(Date) . .T' ■ tVivuuirt or Mir.MiSotkOnsite. Sewage Treatment Program Soil Observation Log Project ID:V 04.01.2021 Client:David Sweere Location / Address: 38690 MISTY PT RICHVILLE, MN 56576-0000 Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)r~] Outwash Q Lacustrine O Loess Q Till r~l Alluvium I I Bedrock n Organic Matter Elevation-relative to ________benchmark:Landscape Position: (select one)Summit Slope %: 1.0 Slope shape Linear, Linear Limiting Layer Elevation:Soil survey map units:LawnVegetation:1120 Weather Conditions/Time of Day:06/16/22Dateam sunny Observation #/Location:#2 Observation Type:Auger Structure'IRock IDepth (in)Redox Kind(s)Texture Matrix Color(s)Mottle Color(s)Indicator(s)Frag. %Shape ConsistenceGrade 10YR 2/2Medium Sandy Loam0-14 <5 Blocky Weak Friable 10YR 4/3Sandy Clay Loam14-32 <5 Blocky Weak Friable 10YR 5/3 10YR 4/3 Concentrations SISandy Clay Loam32 <5 Blocky Weak Friable Depletions10YR 7/2 Comments restrictive 24" l.herebycertify^thaU have completed this_workJn accordance with-alLapplicable.ordinances,-rules and-laws. Trevor Roisum L-^09S _______(Designer/Inspector) 4095 6/16/2022 (Date)(Signature)(License #) L'kiVhxlll'V 6^ Mn-NbdDUOnsite. Sewage Treatment Program Soil Observation Log Project ID:V 04.01.2021r. David Sweere Location / Address:Client:38690 MISTY PT RICHVILLE, MN 56576-0000 I I Outwash n Lacustrine Q Loess O Till I I Alluvium I I BedrockSoil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)I I Organic Matter Elevation-relative toSummitLandscape Position: (select one)Slope %: 1.0 Slope shape Linear, Linear benchmark: Limiting Layer Elevation:Lawn Soil survey map units:1120Vegetation: Weather Conditions/Time of Day:06/16/22Dateam sunny Observation #/Location:#3 Observation Type:Auger Structure—I-IRockDepth (in)Matrix Color(s)Mottle Color(s)Redox Kind(s)Indicator(s)Texture Frag. %ConsistenceShapeGrade 10YR 2/2Medium Sandy Loam Blocky0-14 <5 Weak Friable 10YR 4/3Sandy Clay Loam Blocky14-24 <5 Moderate Friable Concentrations SI10YR 4/4 10YR 5/2Sandy Clay Loam 24 <5 Blocky Moderate Firm Depletions10YR 5/6 10YR 5/8 Comments restrictive 24" I. hereby„certify_that I have completed this-work in accordance-with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws Trevor Roisum jLj/O^S 6/16/2022;4095 ; ' (Signature),(License #). (Designer/Inspector)(Date) GSC, 540 W Hr, Fi^us Falls, MN 56537 OmSTOH 218-998-8095; Website:Wf I Subsurface Sewage Treatment System Management Plan ; Sewage Treatment System Permit Number:i AixJProperty Owner:; 2^7Parcel Number:. %9 ^*77^ 0^Lake Name / Number: CkIc( Ar Section: E-911 Address: This management plan will identify the operation and maintenance activities necessary to ensure long-term performance of your septic system. Some of these activities must be performed by you, the homeowner. Other tasks must be | performed by a licensed septic service provider. Township Name: Homeowner's Management Tasks - Should Be Checked Every 6 months: ieoks-Check (look, listen) for leaks in toilets and dripping faucets. Repair leaks promptly. Surfacing sewage - Regularly check for wet or spongy soil around your soil treatment area. Effluent filter (if applicable) - Inspect and clean twice a year or more. Pump Tank Alarms - Alarm signals when there is a problem. Contact a service provider any time an alarm signals. Holding Tank Alarms - Can be either an electronic or a manuai float, when activated, service (pumping) is t required. Event counter or water meter (if applicable) - Record your water use. Vegetative Cover-Establish and maintain a vegetative cover over the sewage system. ProfessionaTs (Ucensed Septic Service Provider) Management Tasks - Should Be Checked Every 24 Months (2 Years): j Check to make sure tank is not leaking. Check and clean the in-tank effluent filter. Check the sludge/scum layer levels in all septic tanks. Recommend if tank should be pumped. Check Inlet and outlet baffles. Check the drainfield effluent levels in the rock layer. Check the pump and alarm system functions. Check wiring for corrosion and function. Provide homeowner with list of results and any action to be taken. Check inspection pipe caps (replace as necessary). Check manhole cover (accessibility, security, or damage). I understand it is my responsibility to properly operate and maintain the sewage treatment system on this property in accordance with this Management Plan. ; i i n 'i j 1 1 J 11 J ] Date:Property Owner: SignatureV Date;Received by Land & Resource Management: signature The following link will provide Information from the University of Minnesota/regarding a Septic System Owner's Guide: Ut; SSTS Management Plan 07-23-2014 University OF Minnesota -OSTP Soil Observation Log % ' n Client/ Address;Legal Description/ GPS: 18tX)0 % □ Lacustrine □ Loess □ Tillsoil parent material(s): (Check all that apply)□ Alluvium □ Bedrock Q Organic MatterOutwash □ Summit □ Shoulder □ Back/Side Slope □ Foot Slope □ Toe Slope Slope shapeLandscape Position: (check one) Vegetation —- IWeather Conditions/Time of Day: OU^ Soil survey map units IIXO Elevation:Slope% ^ jlv/ iiarjL.Date □ Auger □ Probe □ PitObservation #/Location;Observation Type; I--------Stracture------------1RockDepth (in)Texture Matrix Color(s)Indicator(s)Mottle Color(s) Redox Kind(s)Frag. *IGrade ConsistenceShape CranuUr lir Concentrations WeakRatr Deplptiofis ^/"(jleyed firmPrtsfnallc SlrtgleCram Strang CitrenwtY FirmLooseRlftd Weak frtaUe Extremely F*m Rigid Granulari'10 Concentrations munailclA-^MQOgfaiW;<101o iStrong LooseSingle GrainGleyed Cflfic^ratiaif^s rBEpletiopa Gleyed I Loose FruMe CraiwUr ft Weakr—WoderaB2iPrisinailc Single Crain Massive Strong Loose Extremety FirmRigid CrsnUarConcentrations Depletions Gleyed WMk Moderate Strong Loose I IMaty FnaMe BlCKky Mm tic Stnglt Craltt Massive FVmt Exuemety F^ Rigid1 Loose FnaBte (dfantSar Raty Uocky Mamatic Single Cram MCQive Concentrations Depletions Gleyed Weak Moderate Strong Loose I Firm Exuemety TernRigid Granular 1Concentrations Depletions Gleyed Weak Moderate Strang Loose FnabicPlity eiodiy PilvnatK UngieOtam MassFve Firm Eatrcmcty Fern1 Rigid f n')Ro\Sum ___________________ / hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. Comments I ^r-) i It bn ; "Tbl.l ^ (County Inspector) _______ ‘ (\ (Signature)(Date)(Certification It) OTTER TAIL COUNTY Fergus Falls, Minnesota )STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss )COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL I, Amy Busko, Secretary for the Board of Adjustment for Otter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that on the 30th day of June 2022 the attached Notice of Hearing for Variance was duly served upon the individuals listed below and/or included in the attachment: Township Clerk Lake AssociationProperty Owner Pamela Moe, Clerk Rush Lake Township 43394 Round Lake Dr Ottertail MN 56571 Marion Lake Association Jim Kushinski PO Box 112 Richville MN 56576 David Sweere 38690 Mistry Pt PO Box 57 Richville MN 56576 City Clerk (if located within 2 miles of a city) City of Richville, Leslie Lee, Clerk, 611 3''“ Street SW, Richville MN 56576 Otter Tail Water Management District—Email Notice if it is in the district - ottertailwatermanaQement@outlook.com in Lake Improvement District (If project is located on their lake, mail notices to the Lake Improvement District) Big McDonald: Devils (Near_Perham): EaglaXal ” Lida Laly Little Big McDonald Lake Improvement Dist., PO Box 81, Dent, MN 56528 Devils Lake Imp. Dist., PO Box 431 Perham, MN 56573 Eagle Lake Imp. Dist., Kelly Hepper, 38079 South Eagle Lake Rd., BL, MN 56515 Lida Lakes Imp. Dist. David Hilber, 41026 Backroad TrI, Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 lid, Kerbs & Paul: LMKP Lakes Imp. Dist., PO Box 133, Perham, MN 56573 Pine Lakes Imp. Dist., PO Box 405, Perham, MN 56573 Pelican, Fish, Bass & Lt Pelican: Pelican Lake Group Lake Imp. Dist., PO Box 336, Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 South Turtle Lake: Little l^e & Big Pine: South Turtle Lake Imp. Dist., PO Box 168, Underwood, MN 56586 Otter Tail County COLA, 4302 13'^ Ave S Ste. 4-333, Fargo, ND 58103 Chuck Grotte, OTC Hwy Engineer, 505 S Court St Suite #1, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Julie Aadland, DNR Eco & Water Resources, 1509 1®* Ave N, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Board of Adjustment Members: Thomas (Tom) Lee, 15600 County Hwy 118, Elizabeth MN 56533-9559 Darren M Newville, 614 6'^ St NE, Perham, MN 56573 Rick West, 17906 West Swan View Rd., Fergus Falls MN 56537 Michael Donoho, 1819 Court St. S., Fergus Falls MN 56537 Terry Marthaler, 37273 S. Little McDonald Dr., Perham MN 56573 Mark T. Johnson, 44229 Monument Beach Loop, Pelican Rapids MN 56572 Planning Commission Member Dax'id Wass - 29133 260*’’ St., Underwood MN 56586 By placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid and depositing the same in the United States Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, properly addressed to each of the individuals listed above and/or listed in the attachment.Number OF Notices & Envelopes TO Print File 1Dated: June 30, 2022 Extra BOA Members PC Member Envelopes _ TOTAL NOTICES TO PRINT____24 I I Added to Agenda Map I I Print out Findings of Fact Sheet Newspapers FFDJ & Perham Focus 4Amy Busko, Secretary Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment 6 1 MinutesBy:12Amy Busko idhttps://ottertailmn.sharepojnt.com/sites/LandResources/Sh Affidavit (56-243) 07-14-22.docx ■■ ^ Buffer Parcels Name 2 y fTi \ Addr2 Citv St ZiDParcel No Addr 1Name 1 Burnsville MN 55337 412053000990772000 Grant L Wilson 13503 Oakland Dr Champlin MN 55316 202553000990773000 Don M Lemke Et Al 1305 Xylon Ave N Richville MN 56576 955253000990774000 Loren M & Jodi Bergland Holen 38507 Misty Pt Plymouth MN 55442 324353000990775000 Dennis L Martodam Rev 1st 5555 Trenton Ln N Saint Cloud MN 56304 943553000990776000 Michael & Julie Nets 5869 9th St SE Sheldon ND 58068 97395750 147th Ave SE53000990777000 Misty Point 38663 LLLP Perham MN 56573 016353000990778000 David D Sweere PO Box 163 Richville MN 56576 006653000990779000 Dale A & Barbara J Pittman 38664 Misty Pt PO Box 66 Crystal MN 55429 363453000990780000 Wade Wendlandt & D Schultz 5021 Fairview Ave N Saint Francis MN 55070 450453000990781000 Christopher T & Amie Paulson 1063 240th Lane W Perham MN 56573 885753000990782000 Evan F & Samantha Lachowitzer 43896 505th Ave Richville MN 56576 960440588 Misty TrI53000990783000 Bruce A Halverson Jr 0053000990784000 To The Public Page 1 of 1Thursday. June 30. 2022 Buffer Mail Address i City, State, ZipNameAddress 2 Bruce A Halverson Jr 40588 Misty TrI Richville MN 56576 9604 Dennis L Martodam Rev Tst Plymouth MN 55442 32435555 Trenton Ln N Don M Lemke Et Al 1305 Xylon Ave N Champlin MN 55316 2025 Loren M & Jodi Bergland Holen Richville MN 56576 955238507 Misty Pt Evan F & Samantha Lachowitzer 43896 505th Ave Perham MN 56573 8857 Misty Point 38663 LLLP 5750 147th Ave SE Sheldon ND 58068 9739 Michael & Julie Nefs 5869 9th StSE Saint Cloud MN 56304 9435 Christopher T & Amie Paulson 1063 240th Lane W Saint Francis MN 55070 4504 Dale A & Barbara J Pittman 38664 Misty Pt Richville MN 56576 0066PO Box 66 David D Sweere Perham MN 56573 0163PO Box 163 Wade Wendlandt & D Schultz 5021 Fairview Ave N Crystal MN 55429 3634 Grant L Wilson 13503 Oakland Dr Burnsville MN 55337 4120 Thursday, June 30, 2022 Page 1 of 1