Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout53000990352000_Conditional Use Permits_09-11-2013q)ul2Dl3 OTTER TAIL COUNTY Conditional Use Permit # Owner’s Name Property Address ^1 . Location: Lake Nl6C>-0'n^ec. t1 Two. Range 3^ Twp. Name/^uth .TS-OOO-TT-Oa^Z-OOO Work Authorized:;' a-'5.a,yhf Kaninel per N«e>Kcl K<y-kvyefj afc ion|2o>5 PZM-K. <to&b \“^sV»cVd J»e'>yVmAwfs ^Vy ^ -qp fo Expires:Valid: Resource Management Official / DateLshd 1. Entire area shall be stabilized within 10 days of the completion of any earthmoving unless othenwise stated. 2. Owner is legally responsible for all surface water drainage that may occur. 3. If the terms of this permit are violated the entire permit may be revoked and the owner may be subject to legal prosecution. 4. This card shall be placed in a conspicuous place not more than 4 feet above grade on the premises on which work is to be done, and shall be maintained there until completion of such work. 5. NOTIFY DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,TELEPHONE (218) 998-8095, WHEN AUTHORIZED WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED.BK-1004-046 319.983 • VldytundewiCo.. Prinlera • Fargut Fats. MN • 1-900-346-4970 4^ DOC# 1135719Date Stamp 1135719 Fee: $46.00 Certified, Filed, and/or Recorded; Well Certificate [ ] Rec'd October 24, 2013 8:30 AM Brian Armstrong, Recorder OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Returned To: LAND & RESOURCE By: NDB L&R Initial THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / INTERIM USE PERMIT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.nrin.us R^ipt Nifn^r m.m.m Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Accepted By / Date, I DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER(S) MAILING ADDRESS LAKE CLASsTl(? -Afs/S:^[j^_i£2j[2j.AKE NAME ^ TOWNSHIP ^ *0^ 0 LAKE NUMBER ^m\ Sr. t om TOWNSHIP NAMESECTION RANGE *o E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION Please check the appropriate requests yCONDITIONAL USE PROJECT Industrial UseTopographical Alteration___ Commercial Use Forest Land Conversion___ Commercial WECS Cluster Development___ Extractive Use Miscellaneous ____________________ INTERIM USE PROJECT Existing Dwelling Removal____ Existing Dwelling Repurposing____ SPECIFY YOUR REQUEST. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. I am requesting the approval of Pawz Plaza; a Dog & Cat Boarding, grooming and daycare facility. A total of 9 doggie-rooms and 3-kitty cottages would be available for reservation and/or daycare. Personal one- on-one care would be available; if needed, 24/7 to the pets but office hours would be as follows: M - F: Sam - 6pm, Saturday: Sam -3pm, Sunday: Sam-Spm Appropriate Signage; one lighted; proposed location on side of business building & 1 non-lighted at driveway entrance. Lighting is also being requested: lighting of signage and 1 yard light, along with a concrete sidewalk, holding tank and outdoor fenced-in play area(s). Waste would be collected and disposed of properly twice a week at minimum. Also, a rail fence located from the parking area to entry door of facility creating a barrier from Hwy 7S. Just in case; dogs especially, slipped off leash or got away from their mums & Dads. Project proposed and projected to be completed by Spring of 2014. I UNDERSTAND THAT APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST APPLIES ONLY TO THE U^ OF THE LAND. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED; IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. A''Q>(^0/1,^ ' DATEiiJOKPROPERTY owner / AGENT FOR OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 361.825 • Victor Lundeen Co Printers • Fergus Falls MN • 1-800-346-4870 pJi/. II. P>d/^Date Of Planning Commission Hearin Time Planning Commission Recommendation October 9. 2013 - Motion: A motion by Trites, second by Wilson, to approve a maximum of 15 doggie rooms as per the Applicant’s revised request, including the construction of the kennel per the material received at the October 9, 2013 Meeting, and provided the dogs are restricted to being indoors from 9:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.. Chairman/Otter Tail County Plannifig Commission 10 - County Board Action Approved As Recommended Denied As Recommended Other fo//5ll3 Chairman/Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners Date of Final Action L & ROfficial/Date 7uCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #„ oa. INTERIM USE PERMIT # L & R Official/Date Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) L & R Official/D/ite ^Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and MN DNR bk 08012013-006 4 OTC Board of Commissioners’ Minutes October 15, 2013 Page 4 o MFIP/DWP (Minnesota Family Investment Program/Diversionary Work Program) employment services provided by the Rural Minnesota CEP program o Emergency Assistance/Crisis Services funding for low income families o Income Maintenance Program Administration services to assist eligible low-income families to seek economic assistance benefits Planning Commission Recommendations Preliminary Plat - “Haaaart’s Second Addition’’-Carmon & Carole Lynnes: Motion by Rogness, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve the Preliminary Plat of Carmon & Carole Lynnes titled “Haggart’s Second Addition” consisting of three non-residential (attached) lots with a condition as recommended by the Planning Commission. The project is located on Lot 1 Haggart’s Addition, Section 4 of Dunn Township; Pelican Lake (56-786), GD. Conditional Use Permit - Josh & Holly Burke: Motion by Froemming, second by Rogness, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit for a dog and cat boarding, grooming and daycare facility to approve a maximum of 15 doggie rooms as presented in the Applicant’s revised request received at the October 9, 2013 Planning Commission meeting with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. The project is located on Klinger’s Riverside Lot 9 ex pt E of Hwy, Section 27 of Rush Lake Township; Otter Tail River (56-OTR). Interim Use Permit - Ron & Kim Burd: Bill Kalar, Land & Resource Director, presented a request from Ron & Kim Burd for an Interim Use Permit to use a current dwelling while constructing a home and then repurpose the original dwelling for office use. Mr. Burd and his contractor spoke to the Board regarding the request and the recommendation from the Planning Commission. Lengthy discussion followed regarding two dwellings on a lot and the intent of the repurposing language in the Shoreland Management Ordinance. Motion by Johnson, second by Rogness, and unanimously carried to approve an Interim Use Permit for short term use of the current dwelling as recommended by the Planning Commission and for repurposing the current dwelling as requested by the Applicant, provided: 1) impervious surface rules are met; 2) setback rules are met; and 3) due to repurposing, the onsite septic system must be sized for an additional bedroom. The project is located on Lot 10 BIk 1 Big Sandy Beach, Section 31 of Corliss Township; Big Pine Lake (56-130), GD. Conditional Use Permit - “Big McDonald Resorf’-Chad & Lisa Gabrieison: Motion by Froemming, second by Johnson, and unanimously carried to approve a Conditional Use Permit to subdivide resort land with a condition as recommended by the Planning Commission. The proposal is located in Pt of GL 1, Lots 5-10 First Addition to Kozelnik Beach and Lots 1 & 2 Second Addition to Kozelnik Beach, Section 18 of Edna Township; Big McDonald Lake (56-386), RD. Tuition Assistance Request Motion by Johnson, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to approve Highway Department Tuition Assistance Agreements for Wade J. Bugbee and Jason M. Lee as presented by the Public Works Director. CSAH 3 Retaining Wall Repairs Motion by Rogness, second by Lindquist, and unanimously carried to authorize the appropriate County Officials’ signatures to execute a Highway Construction Contract between the County of Otter Tail and Ben Wolden Landscaping of Fergus Falls, MN for retaining wall repairs on CSAH 3 at Bridge No. 56526 over the Otter Tail River. V OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Otter Tail County. Planning Commission October 9. 2013, Page 2 Motion: A motion by Trites, second by Wilson, to approve a maximum of 15 doggie rooms as per the Applicant's revised request, including the construction of the kennel per the material received at the October 9, 2013 Meeting, and provided the dogs are restricted to being indoors from 9:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. Voting: All Members in favor. Ron & Kim Burd - Approved With Conditions: An Interim Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Continued use of current dwelling space during construction of permanent home to be completed by July 1, 2014. Current dwelling to be repurposed by August 1, 2014 for use as an office/studio with kitchenette. Height of existing structure is 20. The project is located on Lot 10 BIk 1 Big Sandy Beach, Section 31 of Corliss Township; Big Pine Lake (56-130), GD. Kim & Ron Burd and John Anderson (contractor) represented the Application. Motion - Withdrawn: A motion by Trites, second by Wilson to deny because the plan, as proposed by the Applicant, does not adequately repurpose the existing dwelling as a non­ dwelling structure. Motion: A motion by Trites, second by Wilson to approve the continued use of the current dwelling space, during the construction of the permanent home, provided the dwelling is repurposed by August 1, 2014, by removal of the upstairs plumbing, the upstairs walls (partitions) and all appliances, and the outside deck must be modified into a landing. Voting: All Members in favor. Big McDonald Resort - Chad & Lisa Gabrlelson - Approved With A Condition: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as staled by the Applicant on the Application): Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of 17.1 acres (Tract B). Tract B is currently a part of an existing resort (Big McDonald Resort). Tract A and all land on the lake side of Big McDonald Lane will be retained by the resort. Resort will go from 23.5 acres to 6.4 acres. The proposal is located in Pt of GL 1, Lots 5-10 First Addition to Kozelnik Beach and Lots 1 & 2 Second Addition to Kozelnik Beach, Section 18 of Edna Township; Big McDonald Lake (56-386), RD. Chad Gabrielson and Dan Hanson (Moore Engineering) represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Larson, second by Schwartz to approve the Applicant’s request, with the condition that a revised plan is submitted to Land & Resource that confirms there is sufficient land area to meet the density requirements for the existing 9 dwelling units and that no parcel smaller than 5 acres is created. Voting: All Members in favor. Adjourn: At 8:30 P.M., Chairman Olson set the Meeting. The next Meeting is scheduled for 6:30 P.M. on November 13, 2013. Otter Tail County Government Services Center, 540 West Fir, Fergus Fails, MN 56537 218-998-8095 October 9, 2013 Meeting of the Otter Tail County Planning Commission was held on October 9, 2013 at 6:30 P.M. in the Commissioner's Room, Government Services Center, Fergus Falls, Minnesota. Roll Call: Members Present: Loren Bailey, Rod Boyer, Richard Gabe, Marion Gill, Bernie Larson, Bert Olson, Robert Schwartz, David Trites, David Wass and Rick Wilson. Members Absent: None, David Hauser represented the County Attorney's Office and Bill Kalar represented the Land & Resource Management Office. Minutes of September 11. 2013: A motion by Wilson, second by Larson to approve the September 11,2013 Minutes as presented. Voting: All members in favor. “Haqqart’s Second Addition" - Carmon & Carole Lynnes - Approved With A Condition: A Preliminary Plat of "Haggart's Second Addition" consisting of 3 Non-Residential Lots, 1 Block. The project is located on Lot 1 Haggart's Addition, Section 4 of Dunn Township; Pelican Lake (56-786), GD. Carmon Lynnes and Dan Hanson (Moore Engineering) represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Boyer, second by Wass to approve as presented, provided the wells are accurately identified on the survey. Voting: All Members in favor. Josh & Holly Burke - Approved With Conditions: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): I am requesting the approval of Pawz Plaza; a Dog & Cat Boarding, grooming and daycare facility. A total of 9 doggie-rooms and 3 kitty cottages would be available for reservation and/or daycare. Personal one-on-one care would be available; if needed, 24/7 to the pets but office hours would be as follows: M - F: Sam - 6pm, Saturday: Sam - 3pm, Sunday: 8am - 8pm. Appropriate Signage; one lighted: proposed location on side of business building & 1 non-lighted at driveway entrance. Lighting is also being requested: lighting of signage and 1 yard light, along with a concrete sidewalk, holding tank and outdoor fenced-in play area(s). Waste would be collected and disposed of properly twice a week at minimum. Also, a rail fence located from the parking area to entry door of facility creating a barrier from Hwy 78, Just in case; dogs especially, slipped off leash or got away from their Mums & Dads. Project proposed and projected to be completed by Spring of 2014. The project is located on Klinger's Riverside Lot 9 ex pt E of Hwy, Section 27 of Rush Lake Township; Otter Tail River (56-OTR), Transition. Motion - September 11. 2013: A motion by Trites, second by Bailey to table, at the Applicants request, to the October 9, 2013 Meeting, to allow time for the Applicant to address the potential noise (decibel) level(s); in order to make notice of the tabling & to inform of the change from 9 doggie-rooms & 3 kitty-cottages (12 total) to 15 doggie-rooms; the Land & Resource Office must resend notification. Holly & Josh Burke represented the Application. Barry Stewart indicated that it appears that their concerns have been addressed by the Applicant's research; answers were provided regarding questions on the proposed holding tank for animal waste. Respectfully submitted, r—s. Marsha Bowman Recording Secretary > •• SCALE DRAWING FORM PS ?. nr^o i4-,. Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface calculations. > 5. Wg,,v I*%Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) 0 • 0! i 0 , DOti4 I:V \ \ \ \ 1it; jf'^e(\noei_ to F&N)C;erO L/)£t:riE-'DOfcr_ 4- '.cw 4-?'D> ?\ D:S 3^ M , I>0c IT■ ',i)Q3 Jo5<p/‘. •;..--1♦i i 4o't-2 ■M J'T J* ue«r**iti :Od.t-SH (i a ^ (4i<- vri ! 4/1 .1 !a IQrtco4))V* VAC-ti UtiHT - SvAiAup AeeA HL-i • w'^u. r4 *4': C.'AatA'UWfLfEMClKX^PateO Aft-4 'u*!M//I c ?2lvrl4lA0iar^4 '' - bvjrnW U» M tiED -Tb ;,i!iI d) IU^]h4€l S cjO :? r)br\.-uant<d V#2^ ■ t>tLA\vo told =. se-pvioi^vL - ?ropo6e^(j;^n(ine/al~v /ter b proud 43<4 ~r<■ 3 I !3S£E. .tssffl »tiJ i > oi 5t~ ■"■ DHvvu tWEtJ 338,59d • Victor Lundeen Co., Priniefs • Fergus Falls, • 1-800-346-48 Signature of Properly Oyrarfr Date BK — 0909 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): Ft2Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s): FPDriveway(s): 5\\X FPPatio(s): ~ ^06 Ff2Sidewalk(s):\ Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wall(s): Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: gM mL . , 0‘S MS X100 = ‘o. Ft2LOT AREA: % IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE • • • # « • -VA %Cv'^'§.‘'sX. g.-■■ I, 5 ,f. 1^‘T- 1 -t- •^'1^ '■^1 =3r2caa« r.<•**•• ’*“*_ KU LV**',_ f_-«t. •»■•#«*J\m If-«»v^03 » a .■#• ■ a a aoa CSJ 'Aa*'.* 333v->a O!‘ff. 3-i* ?(■f. •o4C >c2^•4 •) received SEP ) s 20)3 UNO & RESOURCE Pawz Plaza Sound Research By: Holly Burke Source; http://www.kennelsolutions.com.au/landing_pages/a_5_minute_diploma_course_in_kennel_soundpro ofing_.html "Dogs being dogs will bark, and as we humans don't speak Doggie Language very well, we cannot really make them understand that the neighbors are complaining. When Rover (the sound source) is barking his head off, the output is, say, 80dB(A). However if the kennel has hard reflective surfaces, the sound is amplified by high reverberation, and the resultant sound pressure level may elevate to a disturbing and penetrating 90dB(A). The primary objective of "soundproofing" the kennel is the reduction in the ambient internal noise levels. The secondary objective is to contain as much of this ambient noise from breaking out and reaching the neighbors boundaries. The first objective is easily achieved by the introduction of a high absorbent surface to the roof and available wall areas. If these absorbent surfaces have a large enough area, and a Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) greater than 0.95, the outcome will be a greatly reduced reverberation time. As big dogs, such as Great Danes, bark with a low pitch (125 Hz), the chosen absorber should be as thick as possible, as a greater thickness equates to better low frequency absorption. Smaller dogs such as terriers bark with a much higher frequency (1500 Hz), and almost any absorber will work in this range. The second objective is achieved by having the kennel bounded by walls and a roof with a high mass and stiffness. Double brick walls and concrete roofs are excellent but generally blow the budget to smithereens. The smart approach is the use of composite mass layers with as large an air gap as possible between the same. A typical wall assembly would use 0.5mm roof profile sheet metal as an external cladding fixed to a frame of 100mm steel girths with an internal lining of 12mm fiber cement sheets. If the void between the external metal cladding and the internal fiber cement is part or fully filled with a high density absorbent material, the resultant assembly could have a design rated transmission loss of up to Rw50, which is adequate in most kennel ' . Vlilicrfi' Valirt ■ -7' I 1r-NV*'* >WtIt 'A 4 fss -juit la rOrtiviX ifMi ! Wd0(A) i [iKRMl :OMI KOII ‘s‘■i0d8(A)f IfMi fi^lR(A) I 14.MH(A)f.V V I I I■ V«»ri V F:. rl '/=• feiSIMWA)VInrinii .locations. (• Source: http://doacare.clailvpuDPV.com/decibel-level-barkina-doa-3477.html When a dog barks, it is a minimum of 60 decibels, according to the Southwark Council in the United Kingdom. In some cases, it can increase to more than 110 decibels. Everyday Sounds: If you want to compare the loudness of a dog's bark to some ordinary sounds, consider that a sewing machine is around 60 decibels - the same loudness as a "starting point" bark. A child in the midst of a shrieking tantrum goes to around 110 decibels, which is the same as dog barks on the noisier end of the spectrum. As for defending your ears against possible damage, it's a smart idea to sport earplugs when you're ever exposed to sounds that are a minimum of 85 decibels, advises the Washington Post. Source: http://www.audimutesoundDroofina.com/doa-kennel-sounds-stop-barkino-doas-stoD-barkino- doas.asDX IAudimute‘ii stop barking dogs and excess sound with Call us today y Audimute offers a range of sound solutions to cut down on the echoes and reverberations of the dogs' barking, and effectively stop barking dogs in their tracks. From customizabie paneis to sound absorption sheets, from a smail kennet to a targe business, Audimute's professionals can stop barking dog issues and create a quiet canine haven in your home or for your business. We recommend iooking into Acoustic Panels or Sound Absorption Sheets to stop barking dog noise. Source: PLEASE TAKE THE TIME < IF POSSIBLE < TO WATCH THIS ONLINE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE.COM Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jfh12Phr50 OR Enter: 'Sound Absorption vs. Acoustic Sound Proofing' into the search engine and it should be the first video. . I Source: see separate attachment: "Environmental Noise Assessment" Document. Note: This IS a public knowledge document. I stumbled upon this in my research and have been in contact with this Company. They are well versed in my particular scenario; Dog Kennels. I also have made contact with an Acoustical Consultants Firm in Minneapolis that I will be working with directly. But Bollard Acoustical Consultants Inc. has offered to help however they can: given I can provide particular, accurate information. How can they do so without coming to my location? By using Google-Map, their data & Tools he would be able to put together a similar Assessment. This is to be presented at the Oct. 9*^ meeting. I have been in contact with neighbors across Hwy 78 to the west, as well as resort owners and 2 of the home owners/neighbors on 438'^ Ave that all voiced their support with little to no concern about this proposed business. The two resort owners voiced support (both in physical presence and via phone) about the business because they do not allow for pets in none or all cabins. The one kennel in the near area is not open on specific days and only for a couple hours at a time. Those days happen to be the resorts check-in/check-out days. One resort owner was in such support they offered to mail me all of their resort rental customers; for the year of 2014, contact information so I would be able to send them information and notification this would be available to them and in such close proximity. Pawz Plaza in the “pet world” would be considered a ‘Luxury Dog Resort’ as compared to a Humane Society or a puppy mill for instance which I feel is the painted- picture in the minds of the general’ non-dog owning’ public . They are drastically different. Granted even with the best of experience and expertise you can’t stop a dog from barking. Can it be limited? Yes. Can it be muffled? Yes. Can it be muted? Almost. Can it be avoided? Yes. Pets to theses owners are considered children in their family. Would you take your child to a daycare where you know the child would be crying most of their time there? I would hope not. Being the business owner, my passion for these animals and the fact it’s on our property I assure you I will be seeing that these animals are taken care of to the extant some might consider ridiculous being they are “just pets”. Also, keep in mind I do not want these dogs to be barking all the time either. Not only will it annoy me and my employees but it is and can be detrimental to the dogs & possible cats that would be housed at Pawz Plaza. The amount of decibels an employee is subjected to in an 8hr shift it also regulated by OSHA and following these things I WILL be doing ( sound absorption, stimulation, physical stimulation everything that a Luxury pet resort provides ) will keep the decibels at a legal amount. Included is an example of a 'Doggy Profile” form to show just how in-depth we will be at getting to know the dog before it is boarded. I could include in mine a question asking about barking. Given that information and/or after boarding a dog, if that dog i • causes issues I am able to deny and/or refuse further services with that dog & dog owner. I am also attaching pictures. Not of what Pawz Plaza will look like exactly but it what it will be striving to look like. Furthermore, I feel it will help paint a picture of what the inside of a ‘Luxury pet resort’ looks like if you have never been to one. <• IV I - t . ir { i « /. Noise Level Chart | Acoustical Solutions, Inc. | Octave-band center frequencies for Differ... Page 1 of 2 -(or Noise Level Chart' )^{\ 4 More Sound intensity is measured in decibels (dB). Our range of hearing t. starts at 0 dB and is considered safe up to 70 dB. Over and above tfi^ levei is hazardous and can result in permanent hearing damage. Some facts about dB's: Auditory nerves can be permanently damaged from prolonged exposure at 90 dB. 120 dB can cause pain and ringing in the ear. Sharp pain and extensive destruction of the auditory nerves occurs at 140 dB. The table below presents noise data at octave-band center frequencies for familiar residential, outdoor, transportation and building activity noise sources. Intermittent or peak noises may exceed the data given in the table by 5 dBA or more, depending on the source or environment. For many practical problems, however, the data can be considered to be typical source levels at the given distance and condition, or average general activity levels for interiors. The data can be used for design purposes if proper consideration is given to especially load equipment or sources which may exceed it, unusual site conditions, and any other conditions that deviate from the normal. For example, it is prudent to measure transportation noise at proposed building sites near highways, airports, etc., so design data will represent existing noise sources and reflect specific site features. I a orestv' 1Exam le Source I 63 i 125 i 250 | 500 i 1000 i 2000 4000 | 8000 . Hz Hz I Hz j Hz j Hz Hz Hz ! Hz dBAirHome N/A 46Alarm Clock @ 4' -48 55 62 62 70 80 80 9‘ Electric Shaver @ 59 49 62 60 64 60 59 6858 1.5' 73 72Vacuum Cleaner @ 48 66 69 73 79 73 81 3' 69Garbage Disposal @ 64 83 69 56 55 50 50 49 2'i Clothes Washer @ 2'-3' 59 65 59 59 58 50 46 6254 Toilet (refilling tank)50 55 53 54 57 56 57 52 63 68 65Whirlpool (filling tub)68 65 68 69 71 71 74 59Ringing Telephone @4'-13' 64 64 65 65 53 48 44 37 TV@ 10'N/A 68 69 83 8341567344 62 64! Stereo (teenager volume) 49 67 70 68 63 39 74 60 86Stereo (adult volume) 60 72 83 82 82 80 75 Violin @ 5'72 64 48 755666 75 70 66 91 87 83 79 166 92Normal Conversation @ 3' N/A N/A 91 i Outdoors Birds® 10'N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 50 52 54 57 72Large Barking Dog @ 50' N/A 50 58 68 70 64 52 48 Lawn Mower @ 5'85 87 86 84 81 70 72 8674 Pistol Shoot @ 250'N/A N/A 91 102 106 106N/A 83 99 80 79 68 60 83Teleconference Rooms 65 74 78 75 * 9/19/2013http://www.acousticalsolutions.com/noise-level-chart Noise Level Chart | Acoustical Solutions, Inc. 1 Octave-band center frequencies for Differ... Page 2 of 2 125 250 2000 4000 800063500 1000Example Source dBAHzHzHzHzHz Hz Hz Hz Surf (moderate seas) @ 10’ 71 72 70 71 67 64 58 54 78 Wind in Trees N/A N/A N/A 33 35 37 37 35 43 Transportation Large Truok 55MPH @ 50' 83 85 83 85 81 76 72 65 86 Passenger Cars 55IV1PH @50’ 72 70 67 66 67 66 59 54 71 Motoroycle full throttle @ 50’ 95 95 91 91 87 85 959187 Snowmobile @ 50’65 82 84 75 78 77 79 69 85 Train @ 100’95 102 94 90 86 87 83 79 94 Train Siren @ 50’88 90 110 110 107 100 91 78 109 Car Horn @ 15’N/A N/A N/A 92 95 990 80 60 97 Commercial Airline @ 1 mile 77 82 82 70 N/A 797856N/A Military Helicopter @ 89 809283817672 62 51 500’ Interiors 102 121Amplified Rock Music 116 117 119 116 118 115 109 Audiovisual Room 89 85 80 948589929087 65 88Applause at Auditorium 60 68 75 79 85 84 75 60 50 78Classroom6066 72 77 74 68 108;90 104 106 101 89 79Computer Equipment Room N/A N/A 89 79 108Dog Kennel N/A N/A 90 104 106 101 9080 72 64Gymnasium72 78 84 89 S6 57 8186 85 79 78 77 72 65Kitchen 65 61 77657073757269Laboratory 6864 58 50 40Library60 63 66 67 80 78 8886 85 84 86 82Mechanical Equipment Room 87 10096969190Music Practice Room 90 94 96 91 8668 62Racquetball Court 82 85 80 85 83 75 60 50 78Reception & Lobby Areas 66 72 77 74 6860 8375 68 60Teleconference Rooms 65 74 78 80 79 9/19/2013http://www.acousticalsolutions.com/noise-level-chart ^//*f//3 - 0 This U^^L’VATr^^ C^. - /^c tS d>F ^Uf^f^.^T’ T^fi^ <Cc/^//T) 'Th'r^'i" P^^C^Ti 'J.^LMgS ^eCiigASc It TNiS p^/^iL i • (jMil/lTH nppmtinn<; >9 2ot3 {^JBESOURCE Going Barking Mad?0 Q)LandKennel noise is a stressor for animals and staff, but it can be reduced through good acoustic design classical music—which has been shown to reduce stfess levels—provides a masking noise ^*tethati3n make the dogs less aware of smaller peripheral noises such as people entering the kennels and other dogs. But when it comes to actually coping with the noise that the dogs do produce, the fun­ damental element is reducing reverberation within the kennel. ou LIVE WITH IT, your Staff and adopters live With it, the cats live with it, and even the critters causing most of the ruckus suffer from its effects: the noise from the dog kennels. It's one of the things that can make the shelter environment off-putting for m j both people and pets, and it can be a vicious cycle: The more stressed \ out dogs are, the more they're inclined to discuss it, and the more^ p I j they discuss, the noisier and more stressful the kennel becomes. ' Y them easy to disinfect—but Mme of the very qualities that make them cleanable make them noisy, since sound bounces off hard, hon- porous surfaces. Even the ventilation reqiire- Strategic use of materials that reflect or absorb ments for disease control are often at'odds sound in particular ways is one of the primary with the design elements that jnake for means of noise control. Construction mate- reduced noise. i ■, rials can be measured to determine the no/lse The control of noise usually takes otie of reduction coefUdent, or NRC, which is a meas- two forms: the control of noise within a room ure of the percentage of sound that a par- and the control of noise leaving a room through ticular product absorbs. The ability of prod- walls, roofs, doas, and windows. Controlling noise within a room requires the means to both block or reduce the source of the noise and to minimize reverberation. Most of the sound that humans hear is reverberated or reflect­ ed from hard surfaces around us: the struc- J ture of the human ear is such that without reverberation, we would be able to hear only the sounds that were in the general direc­ tion of our ears. (Certain animals—cats, / for example—have directional hearing, I allowing them to hear, even without reverberation, sounds not directed ^ towards them,) Because it's the dogs who are the major culprit behind kennel noise, there are praai- cal as well as humane reasons to make sure the shelter's canine charges are kept as comfy as possible. Regular walks and socialization as well as toys and other comfort items can all contribute to a sense of doggy well-being and make dogs less likely to vocalize due to stress. Designing the kennels so that the dogs in the runs don't have to be eye-to-eye all day long is another stress-reducer. Quiet, continuous There are ways to reduce kennel noise, and the best time to plan for a little more peace and quiet is before the barkers even arrive. If your organization is making plans to build a new facility or retrofit an old one, planning for good acoustics should be a major part of the architect's design process. A version of this article, which provides preliminary advice on effective noise con­ trol, originally appeared In the Pet Services Journal ("Controlling Noise in the Kennel," May-June 2003) and has been adapted for the sheltering audience. The author, C. Scott Learned, is the president of Design Learned, Inc., a building systems engineering and design firm that specializes in animal care facilities. The original article and more infor­ mation about the firm's services are available at www.designlearned.com. Soundproofing the Shelter Acoustic design is particularly complex in the shelter setting because many of the sound reduction products that can be used safely in other settings can't be used in a kennel. For example, in sites where noise is created pri­ marily by machinery or people, the loudness can be reduced through strategic use of porous materials, which are the most effective surfaces for minimizing and absorbing sound. But in the shelter, the need for thorough cleaning and disinfection of surfaces precludes the use of the most effective materials for noise control. Kennel surfaces must be non-porous and washable and are usually hard, making NRCs and STCs—Demystifying Construction Materials Z00|^N1MAL SHELTERING I 29 vAltei.w! JAN 1 FEWWW ANIMALSHELTERING ORG * i 111 11 of the scale: it has an NRC of 1, mean­ ing it is perfectly absorptive. (These val­ ues are general, and you should review product literature—or hire a design pro­ fessional with acoustics experience— before purchasing a product.) While the NRC is a measure of how much sound a product absorbs, the STC—or sound transmission class— rates how much sound a product transmits. Products that control the reduction of sound through a barrier have a number that represents deci­ bel reduction that the product provides. A product with an STC of 0 doesn't reduce sound at all: the sound would be equally loud on both sides of the barrier. What all these numbers and abbre­ viations mean is essentially this: Within the kennels, you want to use materi­ als with a higher NRC to absorb the direct and reverberated sound of the dogs, thus reducing the loudness with­ in the kennel itself. For the barriers between the kennels and the rest of the shelter—walls, doors, and the like— you want to use products with a high­ er STC so that the noise still coming from the kennels seeps into the rest of the building as little as possible. As a general rule, products with good STCs have poor NRCs, and vice versa. Some general examples of the STC values of design facets you may have in your own building: A solid core wood door with poor seals would have an STC of around 22, whereas acousti­ cally designed and sealed doors should be between 35 and 50. source of direct noise physically close to the ears of kennel technicians. Dogs are pack animals and love to be heard, and will frequently begin vocalizing when they hear the sounds of other dogs. Unfortunately, acoustic sound panels have no effect for those in the direct path of the barking. And since kennels are usually made of hard, sound-reflective materials, they cre­ ate a substantial amount of echoed noise. So what kennel techs face every day amounts to multiple sources of direct noise and an unbearable—and potentially ear-damaging—level of reverberation. For direct, intanal kennel noise, there are three solutions: sound blocking, rever­ beration control, and animal excitation control. Sound blocking refers to a phys­ ical, solid barrier between kennel staff and the dogs, Plexiglas, Lexan, or safe­ ty glass panels over most of each cage door will reduce the decibel level of the barking for kennel staff, and will cause each dog to hear the noises of other dogs less. But the use of such products must be combined with an appropriate ven­ tilation system that provides for direct exhaust from the dog cage. Acoustic treatments for direct ken­ nel noise are generally limited to ceiling and wall materials. To avoid contact with urine and damage from excessive con­ tact with chemical cleaners, acoustic treatments must be washable and should be located five feet or more above the floor. (Unfortunately, this lim­ its their effectiveness because most of the noise sources are below that level.) Generally speaking, massive mate­ rials such as concrete absorb low fre­ quencies, such as the booming bark of St. Bernards, and light porous mate­ rials absorb higher Chihuahua squeaks. Thicker materials and trapped air spaces make better absorbers. Acoustic products, even acoustic con­ crete, should never be painted, sealed, or otherwise altered. Practically any fin­ ish will diminish the product's noise- reducing qualities. ^Address noise issues at the design phase, in terms of construction methods and materials as well as space planning. “□Reducing dogs’ stress will reduce (Jogs’noise. “□Anything you do for noise control will affect ventilation, fire protection, lighting, cleaning, and other functions of the kennel. □□Hire engineers and architects with experience in animal care design. They can help you weigh the importance of the competing needs for noise and disease control. IjlJ uu ucts to absorb sound energy varies with frequency—another difficult issue in shelters, where the barking of many breeds and sizes of dog covers a large range of frequencies. To standardize the measurement the NRC of a given material is the average of the sound absorption at four different frequencies. On the NRC scale of 0 to 1, a product with an NRC of 0 is a per­ fectly sound-reflective surface, meaning it doesn't absorb sound at ail and will in fact exacerbate the effects of back­ ground barking: an NRC of 1 means the product is perfectly absorptive. For example, hard, smooth glass has an NRC of 0 and will simply bounce sound back into the kennels. Three-inch-thick glass fiber board is on the opposite end The Sounds of Hounds There are three typical noise problems in animal care facilities: direct kennel noise, internal room-to-room noise trans­ mission, and external noise transmission to neighboring properties. Treating the direct noise produced by dogs is diffi­ cult: in buildings designed for purposes other than animal care, the primary problem is the reverberation of noise— but in kennels, each dog creates a 30 ANIMAL SHELTERING JAN I FEB 2004 WWW.ANtMALSHELTERING.ORG ' • 4 ' Preventing Leakage terns should run under the floor. Avoid Noise from the kennels frequently leaks windows and doors in the kennel into other areas of the shelter, and that's area—but If windows must be includ- for the control of noise both generat­ ed by and transferred through mechan­ ical systems, but it's also very prone to collect fur, bacteria, and fungi. Since it's difficult to clean, duct liner is not a good choice for most locations in shel­ ters. One final consideration is mechan­ ical noise, such as the low vibration of a rooftop air conditioning unit. Any large mechanical equipment should be locat­ ed away from veterinary exam rooms, offices, and cat housing. Construction elements are as impor­ tant to internal noise control as design. For example, mass reduces noise, but it's only^^iTof the" noise control solu­ tion. The effectiveness of wall mass on noise control is highly dependent on the frequencies that require control. Since kennel noise is made up of a wide range of frequencies, sealed walls, dead air spaces, and insulation are as important as mass. Properly constructed acoustic walls must be built and sealed from the floor to the roof. Any ductwork or other pen­ etrations must be thoroughly caulked and sealed from both sides. One door or window can destroy the acoustic value of a wall. Construction must be impec­ cable, with sealing of all joints, tight seams, and no spaces or gaps. Imagine the room as a vessel of water: If it can leak fluid, it can leak sound. ■ a problem that's definitely best solved ed, they should be non-openable with in the design phase—one poor decision large (three- to six-inch) air gaps can easily undo all the positive noise between the fixed, gasketed panes, control elements, and such problems are expensive to fix later. The front portion of the animal care facility should be separated from Some general guidelines: Animal the kennel by an acoustic wall and an care facilities should be designed with intervening hallway. The exterior doors transitional areas from the loudest loca- from the kennel should be acousti- tions In the rear to the quietest in the cally sealed, and the doors from the front. General kenneling should be in front of the building through the hall the back: bathing, grooming, training, to the kennels should include a dou- and holding areas are best located in ble set of doors. These design ele- the middreT^mcr veterPnary facilities, '■fhehts aTso provide^excellenf^rborne^ quarantine areas, catteries, and recep- pathogen control in properly pres- tion areas should be in the front.surized facilities. Whenever possible, the areas where One of the most common failures humans sit and work should be sep- in noise control is poorly designed arated from the areas where the ani- mechanical systems. Don't allow your mals reside—for the sake of all species mechanical system to be a "design/ involved. Just as the barking can be build" in which the contractor takes stressful for staff, the proximity of responsibility for the design—Instead, machine sounds can be stressful for use an experienced animal care engi- dogs. For example, offices shouldn't be neering firm. Kennel mechanical zones near holding areas: Dogs can hear must be isolated and non-communi- computer monitors and video displays, eating with other areas. (This is criti- which resonate at a frequency beyond cal for disease control as well). All our hearing, and this alone can start mechanical duct systems should be low-velocity, insulated systems and In the design phase, avoid wall pen- should include 360 degrees of turn etrations. High-pressure wash lines, between different rooms, watering systems, and drainage sys- Duct lining is one of the best means some dogs barking. you• u u They hear even more, but good acoustic design can help. E _____________________2004 ANIMAL SHELTERING ]siWWW ANIMALSHELTERING.ORG ^ (0-OCj_ fc , Environmental Noise Assessment \ \>s® Pets Inn Paradise Kennel Sacramento County, California BAG Job #2011-021 Prepared For: All Access Permits, Inc. Ms. Laura Kass 10011 Folsom Boulevard, PMB #137 Folsom, California 95827 Prepared By: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. March 30, 2012 / • <; V:BOLLARD Acoustical Consultants 3551 Bankhead Road ► Loomis, CA 95650 ► Phone: (916) 663-0500 ► Fax: (916) 663-0501 ► BACNOISE.COM Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAG) Introduction Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. has completed an environmental noise assessment for the proposed “Pets Inn Paradise Dog Kennel" (project) at 7000 Stonehouse Road (A.P.N. 073- 0080-081) in Sacramento County, California. The project applicant wishes to board dogs in a new facility to be constructed at the southeast corner of the property. Due to the proximity of existing residences to the project site, Sacramento County has required a noise analysis to ensure that project noise levels do not exceed County noise standards at those nearest residences. Bollard Acoustical Consultants was retained by the project applicant to prepare this study in response to the County’s request. The project site vicinity is illustrated by Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the project site plan and Figure 3 shows a three dimensional rendering of the proposed boarding facility. Criteria for Acceptable Noise Exposure The Sacramento County Noise Element of the General Plan establishes hourly noise exposure limits for non-transportation (stationary) noise sources affecting residential land uses/receivers. These limits are summarized in Table 1, and are applicable to this project. Please refer to Appendix A for definitions of acoustical terminology used in this report. Table 1 Noise Level Performance Standards For Residential Areas Affected By Non-Transportation Noise Sources Sacramento County Noise Element of the General Plan (Draft - May 30, 2007) InteriorExterior Daytime Noise Level Descriptor (7 a.m. -10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) Daytime (7 a.m. -10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) 50 35 35Hourly Uq, dB Maximum Level, dB (Lmax) 55 75 70 55 55 Existing Ambient Noise Environment The existing noise environment in the project area is defined primarily by surface traffic on Stonehouse Road and Jackson Road (Hwy 16). A combination of visual and noise level measurement surveys, use of existing acoustical literature, and application of accepted noise prediction methodologies were used to quantify the existing ambient noise environment in the project study area. To quantify the existing ambient noise environment in the project vicinity long-term (24 hour) ambient noise level measurements were completed at the southern and eastern project property lines from March 8*'^ -12‘^ 2012. Environmental Noise Assessment Pets Inn Paradise Kennel - Sacramento County, California Page 1 r • ' •* ^ o> ;• t'' C*> <1#BOLLARD Acoustical Consultants Figure 3Pets Inn Paradise - Sloughhouse, CA 3D View of Building 4®bollard Acoustical Consultants Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) Two Larson Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model 820 precision integrating sound level meters were used for the noise level measurement survey. The meters were calibrated before use with an LDL Model CA200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4). The noise level meters were programmed to record the maximum and average noise levels at each site during the survey. The maximum value, denoted L level measured at any time during the measurement. The average value, denoted Leg, represents the energy average of all of the noise received by the sound level meter microphone during the measurement period. A summary of the noise level measurement results is provided in Table 2. Appendix B and C contains graphical depictions of the noise measurement results. represents the highest noisemaxi Table 2 Community Noise Measurement Survey results Pets Inn Paradise Kennel - March 9"', 2012 L(JnTime Period Leq LmaxSite 76Daytime Nighttime Daytime Nighttime 56 6016953 69 83 7328266 Notes: » Ldn for long-term measurement sites (Sites 1-2) were calculated based on measured Hourly Leg data. Measured background noise exposure in the project area was recorded to be approximately 53- 69 dB Leg, and 69-83 dB L criteria as presented in Table 1. As a result, satisfaction of the County’s noise level standards shown in Table 1 would ensure that project noise levels are well below existing ambient noise levels at the nearest residences to the project site. These levels are above the applicable County noise exposuremax- Project Noise Generation The primary noise source associated with this facility would be periodic dog barking. BAC has considerable experience in preparing noise studies for dog boarding facilities and, even under the most ideal boarding conditions with highly trained supervision, dogs occasionally still bark. Usually barking occurs in response to some stimuli, such as persons or other dogs entering the kennel area. The degree of barking depends largely on the experience of the staff and the level of stimuli the dogs receive. To quantify noise levels associated with barking dogs, noise level data collected by Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. at the All Pets Boarding facility in Loomis and within the Sacramento SPCA building were used. Environmental Noise Assessment Pets Inn Paradise Kennel - Sacramento County, California Page 5 Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAG) The results of the barking dog noise measurements conducted at the All Pets Boarding facility in Loomis and the Sacramento SPCA were as follows: At a distance of approximately 200 feet from the dogs, the maximum noise level generated by the barking dogs was approximately 55 dB L intermittently was 50 dB Leq. Maximum noise levels within the SPCA building with approximately 60 dogs barking within 30 separate kennels were far higher, measuring approximately 100 dBA within the kennel building. The higher noise levels measured at the SPCA facility represent extreme worst-case conditions due to the dogs being in unfamiliar and stressful surroundings with limited supervision. A more typical, yet still conservative, noise exposure within a kennel area with several dogs barking at once would be 90 dB Lmax. The average noise level measured at 200 feet with approximately 40 dogs barkingmax- The nearest noise sensitive uses to the project site consist of single-family homes to the east of the project site on the east side of Stonehouse Road. The residences are approximately 350 feet from the southeast corner of the Pets Inn Paradise building, as indicated in Figure 1. Because the dogs boarded at the Pets Inn Paradise facility would always be located within the building, even during periods of exercise, there would be no direct exposure of the nearest residences to dogs playing (and barking) outside of the facility. Given the design of the proposed facility, a minimum exterior to interior noise level reduction of 15 dB is predicted for the structure. Given an assumed interior level of 90 dB Lmax, and a building facade noise reduction of 15 dB, the barking dog noise levels at the exterior of the building fagade would be 75 dB Lmax during theoretical worst-case barking activities within the kennel. Projecting this level to the nearest residences using a sound level decay rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance of from the boarding facility yields a maximum noise level of approximately 45 dB Lmax at those residences. This level is well below the County’s 75 and 70 dB Lmax exterior noise level standards for daytime and nighttime periods, respectively. It is also 24-38 dB below measured existing maximum noise levels in the project vicinity. As a result, no adverse noise impacts are identified relative to the County’s exterior maximum noise level standards. Average noise levels generated by dogs barking within this facility will depend on the number of dogs barking at any given time and the duration of time the barking persists. There is a common misconception regarding dog boarding facilities that dogs bark incessantly. In BAC’s experience, at properly designed and operated kennels, barking is actually relatively infrequent. This is particularly true when the kennel area is supervised, as will be the case with this project. As a result, average noise levels associated with dogs barking at the proposed boarding facility are predicted to be at least 15 dB below maximum noise levels, or approximately 30 dB Leq at the nearest residences to the project site. This range of noise levels is well below both the County noise standards shown in Table 1 and measured existing average noise levels reported in Table 2. As a result, no adverse noise impacts are identified relative to the County’s exterior average noise level standards. Environmental Noise Assessment Pets Inn Paradise Kennel - Sacramento County, California Page 6 Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) Standard residential construction resuits in an exterior to interior buiiding fagade noise levei reduction of approximately 15 dB with windows open, and at least 25 dB with window ciosed. Resulting maximum and average noise levels within the nearest residences to the east wouid be 30 dB Lmax and 15 dB Leg. These levels are also well below the Sacramento County interior noise level standards shown in Table 1. As a result, no adverse noise impacts are identified relative to the County’s interior average or maximum noise ievei standards. Conclusions and Recommendations for Noise Mitigation This analysis concludes that noise generated by barking dogs in the proposed kennel area is predicted to satisfy the Sacramento County Noise standards, in addition, predicted barking dog noise ievels are predicted to be weli below existing ambient noise levels at the nearest residences to the project site. These conciusions are based on Bollard Acoustical Staff noise ievei data coiiected at the All Pets Boarding facility in Loomis, Caiifornia, and on noise levei data coiiected within the Sacramento SPCA building, as weil as on the proposed project site pians, and on the requirements of the Sacramento County Generai Pian. In addition, these conciusions are based on BAC site inspections, observations, and application of accepted noise propagation algorithms. Changes to project site plans or operation of the faciiity couid resuit in actual noise levels differing from those described herein. BAC Staff is not responsible for such changes This conciudes our environmentai noise assessment for the proposed Pets Inn Paradise Kennel in Sacramento County, California. Please contact me at (916) 663-0500 or paulb@bacnoise.com if you have any questions or require additional information. ^CANHED Environmental Noise Assessment Pets Inn Paradise Kennel - Sacramento County, California Page 7 Appendix A Acoustical Terminology Acoustics The science of sound. The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pne-project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study. Attenuation The reduction of an acoustic signal. A-Weighting A flequency-response adjustment of a sound level meter that conditions the output signal to approxinnate human response. Decibel or dB Fundamental unit of sound, A Bell is defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure squared over the reference pressure squared. A Decibel is one^enth of a Bell. Community Noise Equivalent Level. Defined as the 24-hour average noise level with roise occurring during evening hours (7-10 p.m.) weighted by a factor of three and nighttime hours weighted by a factor of 10 prior to averaging. Frequency The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signal, expressed in cycles per second or hertz. Ambient Noise CNEL Day/Night Average Sound Level. Smilar to CNEL but with no evening weighting. Eqiivalent or energy-averaged sound level. The highest root-mean-square (RMS) sourxJ level measured over a given period of time. A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound. The amount (or the process) by which the threshold of audibility is for one sourxf is raised by the presence of another (masking) sound. Unwanted sourxf. Lcb Leq Lmax Loudness Masking Noise The level corresponding to the highest (not RMS) sound pressure measured over a given period of time. This term is often confused with the Maximum level, which is the highest RMS level. Peak Noise The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been rerroved. RTeo The unit of sound absorption. One square foot of material absorbing 100% of incident sound has an absorption of 1 sabin. A rating, in decibels, of a discrete event, such as an aircraft flyover or train passby, that compresses the total sound energy of the event into a 1-s time period. The lov\est sound that can be perceived by the human auditory system, generally considered to be 0 dB for persons with perfect hearing. Approximately 120 dB above the threshold of hearing. Sabin SEL Threshold of Hearing Threshold of Pain / .BOLLARD Acoustical Consultants P(LH^/ i' <9 Today's Day & Date: Today's Time: Evaluator: PET RESORT Pet Personality Profile Dog's Name Pet Information Breed__________________ Age __________________ Is your dog spayed/neutered? Veterinarian/Practice SexColor Birthdate When? Where? General When did you acquire your dog? ______________________ If adopted, do you have any knowledge of your dog’s history? Are there any other animals in your household? If so, please list type, sex, and age: How do they get along? Have you ever left your dog alone or with unfamiliar people in a new place before? How did they behave? Where?Has your dog ever been to a dog park? _ Has your dog ever been to dog day camp? Behavior Does your dog have any physical restrictions while playing? ___________ Does your dog have any sensitive areas on their body? ___________ Is your dog afraid of any specific items or noises? ___________________ Are there any kinds of people that your dog automatically fears or dislikes? How does your dog react to puppies? ____________ How does your dog react to children? ____________ " " " " to strangers? ____________ How does your dog react to being crated or confined? Is your dog protective of you, your home or property? Food/Toy Aggressive or Possessive? ______ Has your dog had any formal obedience training? What commands does your dog know? _______ If yes, when and where? /Has your dog ever: Growled at someone? Bitten someone? * -4? Circumstances? __ Circumstances? __ Has your dog ever been attacked or bitten by another dog? Circumstances? 3/28/2012 C:\Users\sadaf\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\6SNM2095\Pet Personality Profile 5 1811 (3).docx '» Does your dog have problems in any of the following areas? (If so, please explain) Yes No If Yes, please explain Allergies Arthritis/stiff limbs Chronic Ear Problems Chronic Eye Problems Digestive problems Heart Condition Seizures Skin Disorders Skin lumps/bumps Surgeries Thyroid Disorder Other Medical Issues Chewing Digging Excessive Barking Fears Jumping Leash Pulling Separation Anxiety Other Behavioral Issues What else would you like to tell us about your dog? Signature of Owner:Date: Day Camp Evaluation Remarks if applicable: 3/28/2012 C:\Users\sadaf\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\GSNM2095\Pet Personality Profile 5 18 11 (3).docx Rccei^£^ C2 ft /^£er/A/G- Pawz Plaza Environmental Noise Assessment Prepared for Holly Burke Pawz Plaza 43931 355th St. Ottertail MN. 56571 October 9, 2013 by Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates, Inc. 5217 West Mill Road, Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55345 952-934-9494 2006 Ford F-350 Horton Ambulance in Commercial Trucks | eBay Motors Page 2 of2 L ElUlGlNCf!3 I MedicalSewkis :^W10IC Back to Wy eBay | Report this rtem | Printer version Return to ic^ About eB<iy Motors Securify Center Policies Government Relations Site Map Contad Us Help Follow us on Twritter Find us on Facebook eBay official time 01^9^ai3 e^^lnc. Al^^^served. the e^y logo are amor>^ the regt^ered trademaiks of eBay^^fley Hu^Bod^and Blue^ok* are registered trademarks of Web Reconstitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and P^ct Poltcv. ® • dfl http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2006-Ford-F-350-Horton-Ambulance-/1909148908507_tr... 10/9/2013 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Introduction Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates was engaged by Pawz Plaza to perform an environmental noise assessment of the proposed dog kennel and the impact on the residential area and compliance with Minnesota Pollution and Control Agency noise standards. Company background: Wm. H. O. Kroll and Associates has a proven track record on well over a thousand projects nationwide. We offer services for performing spaces: music halls, lecture halls, auditoria, amphitheaters and churches. Another focus incorporates sound insulation construction for offices, schools, and residential buildings and industrial noise control. Finally, we offer extensive modelling capabilities and environmental noise assessments. Recent large projects involving environmental impact assessments provided to support city and state noise ordinances and/or permit approvals have included: a. Three Rivers Park District (Twin Cities Metro Area) Elm Creek Park Reserve maintenance facility - Survey, modeling and sound attenuation wall design. b. United Food Service (Plymouth, Minnesota) - modeling of plant expansion and impact on residential neighborhood. c. Mercy Medical Center expansion (Mason City, Iowa) - Hospital expanding into residential neighborhood with new warehousing, docks and backup generator plant requiring extensive sound surveys, modelling, sound barrier and structural design. 4V Figure 1 - Aerial View of Facility Vi Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates October 9, 20131 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Sound Background and MPCA Noise Standards Sound is a travelling wave consisting of minute variations in air, liquid or solid pressure. Noise is usually defines as unwanted sound. The range of human hearing sensitivity is over a million fold so a logarithmic scale is used. Sound pressure level, Lp (formerly SPL) is equal to 20 times the log of the measured sound pressure divided by a reference level with units of decibels or dB. Subjectively, the average human perceives the loudness of sound to be double when the level is increased by 10 dB and perceives the sound to be half as loud when reduced by 10 dB. Objectively, the sound pressure level is doubled/halved at +/-6 dB. Humans have varying sensitivity to sound depending on the fi’equency. Humans can hear well in the 1-3 kHz range with much less sensitivity at higher and lower frequencies. The A-weighted filter is an attempt to match typical hearing sensitivities. Specifically, the filter gives more significance to mid frequencies and discounts high and low frequencies. A weighted sound pressure levels are denoted dBA in this report. Use of the A-weighting allows noises of differing frequency content to be compared based on human perception. Most noise ordinance and OSHA rules specify that sound levels be recorded using an A-weighted filter. Most modem noise ordinances use statistical measures of noise levels, typically Lio (LIO) and Lso (L50) measured in decibels using an A-weighted filter (dBA). The LIO (level 10%) number is the sound level that is exceeded 10% of the time during the test period of one hour (think of it as the 6th loudest minute during the hour). Likewise, the L50 level is the median or 50th percentile (the level that was exceeded 30 of 60 minutes). Although not perfect, these metrics are easily measured and quantifiable with professional test equipment. These metrics do ignore short bursts however, and there can be situations where a neighbor may be awakened in the middle of the night by 5 minutes of loud noise without a code being violated. Table 1 below shows the MPCA State Noise Standards LIO and LSO for day and night at a residential property line. Table 1 - MPCA State Noise Standards Minnesota Pollution Control Agency State Noise Standards Day/Night Night (10 pm - 7 am)Day (7 am - 10 pm) dBA dBA Metric LIO LSO LIO LSO MPCA Residential Limit 65 60 5055 Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates October 9, 20132 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Dog Barking Noise Levels The keimel is not currently funetioning so direct measures are impossible. Dog barking is a common noise source so there are sources that provide support to create a suitable model of dog barking within the keimel. Table 2 - Dog Barking Data Reference DistancedBMeasure Notes Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Loomis Ca 100 ft78.1 Lmax Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Loomis Ca 100 ft63.2 Leq Sacramento County Animal Control 30 ft80.5 Lp 100 ftSacramento County Animal Control 66.2 Lp Wikipedia (bark)Maximum100Lp1 m (assumed) J. Applied Animal Welfare Reverberant room - see plot below; 34 large dogs in 26 kennels 90 L50 L50 ~90 dBA (34 dogs 26 kennels)LIO > lOOdBA (34 dogs 26 kermels)□ /00B(Ai a8(MB(A)’ '0 I -□ 90<JB(A)A I niI □ lOOdB(A)1 i 1 ■I« Hi ■ J I ;m3i:i til ajj u.1 L.U fm sti*,• ' •> Af« « Figure 2 - Statistical Noise Data for Dog Kennel - J. Applied Animal Welfare Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates October 9, 20133 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment The Journal of Applied Animal Welfare (JAAW) data is most applicable because it provides a statistical approach to the noise sampling which is directly applicable to the MPCA noise standards. This sample is also a worst case scenario. There were many more dogs than Pawz Plaza could hold and the finish of the kennel area was painted block and glass etc. - a perfect reverberation chamber. The results show that large adoptable dogs created the loudest noise - 50% of the time the area was at 90 dBA, which happens to be the definition of L50 as required for the MPCA standards. LIO levels which are surpassed only 10% of the time can be inferred from this study and the other dog barking studies referenced. Pawz Plaza Noise Model (Worst Case): L50 level at Im is modelled as 87 dBA. This is 3 dB less than the JAAW large adoptable data because at most there will be half as many animals and therefore -3dB. Note, this is the worst case because this group of dogs was significantly louder than the other dog groups. This equates to a sound power level Lw of 98 dB referenced to luW. The LIO level at Im is modelled as 108 dBA. This equates to a sound power level Lw of 116 dB referenced to luW. Given that the closest neighbors’ property line is 143 feet away fi-om the kennel (see figure 3), there is significant reduction in the noise level. This is due to the fact that the sound spreads out to fill a hemisphere above and around the keimel. As the distance grows, the percentage of the sound energy reaching a given area is reduced. The commonly accepted formula is to reduce the sound pressure level by 6 dB for each doubling of distance as per the MPCA guidelines. Therefore, one would expect that the maximum sound levels at 143 feet away would be as follows: L50: 57 dBA LIO: 75 dBA These levels would be in excess of the MPCA guidelines. However, the dogs will normally be within the kennel structure or supervised when outside the structure. The following section discusses the building structure and its impact on sound attenuation. Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates 4 October 9, 2013 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Figure 3 - Plat of the proposed Kennel and residential neighborhood further showing distances to property lines Building Structure and Attenuation The proposed design of the structure will provide significant noise attenuation. Steel siding provides a good noise block and the gypsum wall board interior is excellent. Further the fiberglass insulation is critical as it absorbs the sound between the partition layers converting the sound energy into heat. After reviewing the wall, ceiling and roof plans, it has been determined that if built with care (using caulk to seal the joints, gasket sealed heavy doors etc), the stmcture will provide an attenuation level of at least 40 dB. Appendix 1 shows the data for similar structures. It is important to point out that the kennel runs do not provide the dogs access to the outside - they must be let out by the facility employees. There are also no windows and only one door to the outside from the kennel area. Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates October 9, 20135 t Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Figure 4- Elevation Cross Section showing wall, roof and ceiling detail 40‘-O“ ar-o*13’-D" 340 mm «fQNA 41* mm 4VIONL MH9W.•:o s ■o5 i V. k-53*-MENNKLAMKM. •?if> iraiMi I hI ’s raiPNi-4»ism>4ttirwi 4*Q»*A-41* ma K» 3^•?3•:troue ■o b■i >2 o V> mOML4(*ami 4VRMI 4*iaMi V-6’4'-Q*4‘-Q*6‘~Q*B-6"8-0*5*-r Figure 5- Kennel plan view Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates October 9, 20136 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Results Table 3 shows the MFC A standards, the predicted results and the results without a structure housing the dogs. The results are shown for the night time only for simplicity and the fact that it represents the worst case with a tougher standard than during the day time hours. Table 3 — Property Line Predicted results, without building and MPCA night time standards Day/Night MPCA Night Time Standard Predicted Results Predicted Results w/o structure Metric LIO LIO L50 LIO L50L50 Level dBA 3555 50 17 75 57 The predicted results are well within the MPCA standards. The typical noise levels coming from the kennel will be heard occasionally above the background noise. However, the noise is expected to be less than that of passing cars on the roadway. The outdoor activities at the kennel will have to be supervised carefully to ensure that that there are no noise violations while the dogs are in the yard. It should be pointed out that the dog barking data presented was worst case. Dogs do not usually bark when comfortable with the surroundings and seldom bark at night in a comfortable kennel. Conclusion The Pawz Plaza kernel will operate within the MPCA noise control guidelines if built according to the plan with good technique and the facility is managed well. Noise levels will occasionally exceed background noise levels and be heard, but will not violate the MPCA noise codes. ■•A.*"' - ' Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates 7 October 9, 2013 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Appendix A - Metal Building Insulation - CertainTeed (Acoustic Performance) CertainleedSpecification Sheet SAINT-GOBAIN Metal Building Insulation 202-96 1. PRODUCT NAME CeruinTeed Metal Building Insulation 202-9G 2. MANUFACTURER CertainTeed Corporation P.O. Box 860 Valley Forge, PA 19482-0105 Phone: 610-341-7000 800-233-8990 Fax: 610-341-7571Website: Nv\%'w.certainteed.com/insulation 3. PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Bash Use: CertainTeed Fiber Class Metal Building Insulation 202-96 is a flexible blanket insulation furnished in rolls and intended to be laminated on one side with a suitable vapor retarder. It is used as a thermal and acoustical insulation in the roofs and sidewalls of pre-engineered metal buildings and post frame construction. Ben^ts: Metal Building Insulation 202- 96 reduces transmission of exterior sound to the interior of the building and absorbs reverberating sounds within the building. Composition and Materiais: Compo^ of Inorganic glass fibers bonded with a thermoset resin to form a uniformly textured yellow blanket insulation. Limitations: This product is designe ' for use in interior {weather-prolec* jj walls and roofs of (xe-engineered r Hal buildings. It should be laminated n a first-in, Hrst-out basis and should b< kept dry at all times during processing ar end use. After lamination, packaging < auld not exceed a 5.5:1 compression atio. For additional information, please r« ?r to the appendix of the NAIMA 202-96 Rev 2000; standard. Sizes: Standard available sizes as oted In tabic on other side. Contact Certal feed for non-standard sizes. • Non-combustible: - A5TMEI36 Meets requirements Physkal/Chemicai Properties: • Thermal Resistance: - A5TM C518 and/or ASTM C177 at 75*F i24*C) mean temperature - See ubie below • Acoustical Performance: - See the tables below and on other side • Water Vapor Sorption;-A5TMCI104 No greater tiian 5.0% by weight TTCRMAL PERFORMANa NaininaJ Thldnea Prior Id Umlnatlng R-Vahic RSIIn.mm • Corrosiveness: - ASTM C665 .Meets requirements for steel, copper and aluminum • Odor Emission: - ASTMCI304 Pass • Fungi Resistance: -ASTM Cl 338Pass 3 Vi 10 1.7&06 n 1.943«i 95 I31114V.2J9 133 IS 2.a2 \a l9GVi 3J5 2l171 3.70 203 25 4.406 I I L SOUND TRANSMISSION Transmiision lots in dB al the Octave Frequencies STC Construction Type Rating125 1000250 500 2000 4000 No Insulation 12 13 19 24 30 32 24 R-tO raced 202-96 Insulation Over the Purlins 12 IG 292G374S49 ■JC R-l 9 raced 202-96 Insubiion Qvof the Ptglins___________ 4l 51134920 30 32 202-9G Insulation Over & Benveon the Pi^^linsto nil the Cavity (R-25 Comhincdl 14 24 34 44 53 5G 3G 21No Insubtion 12 14 l9 l9 2720 R-Io faced 202-96 (nsubtlon Over the Girts_____________ 13 IG 37 4G 284. TECHNICAL DATA Applicable Standards: • Model Building Codes: - ICC • Material Standards: - ASTMC99I Type I - NAIMA 202-96 (Rev. 2000) Fire Resistance: • Fire Hazard Classification: - UL 723, ASTM E84, NFPA 255 Max. Flame Spread Index: 25 Max. Smoke Developed Index: i - CAN/L1LC-S102-M88 25 32 R-l3 faced 202-96 Insulation Over the Girts 13 17 26 33 30 47 29 R-l 3 Faced 202-96 Insulation Ov0 the Gins 3V'«' Sted Studs on 24' Centm with Vj' Gypsum Board on interior. JC SI2640 60 64 6S 50 R-l3 Faced 202-96 insublion Over the Gins 3^* Steel Studs on 24' Centers with R-11 Batts & Gypsum Board on Iruerior. 31 SS 73 75 544368 Sound Transmission Class (STC) in aocordanoe with ASTM F90. Roof ctxtstruction is 24ga. stanc&ng scann rooT with B* Z purfirts on 5' cemen^ W'ali construction is 2^a. wall panels screwed to 8* Z giru placed on T cmeri. - Iracfior metal furring wall studi were 3 V*' by 25ga. on 24' centers. rJ Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates October 9, 20138 Burke Kennel - Environmental Assessment Appendix B - Referenced Reports Minnesota Pollution Control Agency - A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194 Acoustical Properties, Measurement, Analysis, Regulation; Nevada County General Plan, Volume 2: Background Data and Analysis, Section 3: Noise Analysis Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. Environmental noise assessment for the proposed “Pets Inn Paradise Dog Kennel” Sacramento County, California. Noise in the Animal Shelter Environment; Building Design and the Effects of Daily Noise Exposure, JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 9(1), 1-7 Crista L. Coppola, Animal Behavior Center, ASPCA, Urbana, Illinois, R. Mark Eims and Temple Grandin Animal Sciences Department, Colorado State University http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bark_(dog) 4#^ - Wm. H. O. Kroll & Associates October 9, 20139 pc iy\£6Tii>/<& Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 ‘(800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.comifNiriSftI r o,Sgunil|ini9(lng, Amtt r NDite&VIMWil TM We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Probiems ADJUSTABLE DOOR SEALS Surface Mounted Automatic Doors Seals • Reduces Sound Through Door Units • Economical • Easy to Install • Durable Kit 1- Standard Automatic Door Bottom 320C 320C © Adjusting screw Adjustable Jamb Seal 33C (3 piece set 2-7' long & 1 - 3’ long)17/32" 33C m 1/2"in i '.4File Seal ■f •I Full case reversible without changing mechanism f A mTii 1-5/16“ Sponge Neoprenei :>5Radiation shielding lead bars available on special order Minimum size 24“ Maximum size 48" Maximum drop 3/4" Sponge Neoprene -------- ’ m■t1 '1 1/4* Max. Adjustment For Lighter Duty use 33 Seriesfe~;j Door Frame Sound GasketsKit 2- Heavy Duty Automatic Door Bottom 330C Adjustable Jamb Seal S99C (3 piece set 2-7' long & 1 - 3' long) 599C 631 — 1/8" X 3/8" X 50 ft.629 — 3/16" X 3/8" X 100 ft. or 300 ft.330C © 3/16" IPlease Note: Door bottoms are not designed to sea) directly on carpet. For best results door bottoms should seal on a solid surface. The solid surface should be positioned above the level of the floor covering on either side of the door. 2-5/16" 1-1/2" .V'*«■ I- ail: It: *Sponge — Neoprene Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Products • Sonex™ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers * Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted r Acoustical Surfaces, Inc.Acoustical '!»?■A SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email; sales® acoustical surf aces, com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.coms.iapmulls'w We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problems Automatic Door Bottom - Anodized Aiuminum Coior Choices iIf. 3X SUndjfd or S99C Hcjvy DtAyClearDark Bronze Gold AdiutUbie Jamb Seals 3 piece set 2 r 11 - 3.1 Automatic Door Bottom - Acoustical Performance STC in Accordance with ASTM E90-75 Door Cai*«d Shut STC With Door Bottom STCModtl -3320C - No Threshold 32 28 330C - No Threshold 44 37 J20C Sundard or }WC Heavy Duty 330C-W1h Threshold 51 43 Automatic Door Bod ami 1 pieceNOTE: standadi 1-3M'Sold Com Door s tWaf STC - 22 (No Saali). 33 (Witli OnorSaala) 7l]a/afSTC-4e "1 bV'' •‘1*IVJ Mortised Door Seal (Adjustable Hidden Door Seal) Seif Adjusting Magnetic Astragal 370A (Used for Double / French Doors) j—5/e H Door Open (Pkingers retracted with litttc friction or wear) With iponge neoprene in bar • : (' A \<‘A."T J3CL jf/l 1-15/Id* Door Closed (Plungers come together wl^n door closes) I . / Maximum length Is 120 (s m p j ■is • Soundproofing Products • Sonex^ Carling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains ■ Equipment Endosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems ♦ Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 »Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 ‘Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticaisurfaces.com We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem STUDIO 3D “ SOUNDPROOF INTERIOR & EXTERIOR DOORS ASI is proud to offer the markets first affordabie soundproof interior door. Our sound controi doors have an STC value up to 56. The Studio 3D soundproof doors are ideal for recording studios, offices, band rooms, hotels, dorm rooms, conference rooms or any application where a soundproof interior door is required. The doors come standard in oak, ready to stain with silver hardware. Custom finishes and hardware options are available. • Low cost high performance • STC ratings up to 56 • Products tested per ASTM E-90 • Custom manufactured to any size specification • Appx. 300 pound door assembly • 2%" 13 layer door assembly • Comes pre-hung and assembled • Adjustable jams and seals • Ready to stain/paint to match your decor • Best performance wood/metal finished door assembly available • Automatic sill • Heavy duty hinges (4) • 3-point handle latching system Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Products • Sonex^ Ceiling & \A^II Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics * Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels * Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) ■ Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Lat^e or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc.AAcoustical Surfaces, Inc SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 ‘Fax (952) 448-2613 *(800) 448-0121 Email: salesQacoustlcalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem DOOR AND FRAME FEATURES: STC Ratings: Acoustical doors are available with ratings up to STC 56. Testing: Door products are tested in accordance with the most recent ASTM E-90 standards at accredited Acoustical Laboratories. Frame Configuration: In addition to our standard frame designs, we can engineer special frame profiles to complement wall construction and architectural style. Services: ASI will provide the necessary shop drawings, certification of test results and assistance with compliance for all industry standards. Guarantee: Studio 3D doors are guaranteed to be for exterior use. free of defects in workmanship and quality for a period of two years. DOOR SPECIFIC FEATURES: Configuration: Doors are available in a flush design or with vision elites and as single or pairs of hinged doors. Sizes: Select from standard or custom sizes. We also offer double door pairs as large as 8' w x 12' h. Hardware: Door, frame, trim, handle, hinges, perimeter sound seals and door bottom are supplied as part of the tested assembly. Dead bolt mortise locks are also available. Finishes: Oak ready to stain. Optional maple, cherry, birch and any wood species are available. Optional primed metal finish is available for frame and/or door. Primed metal finish is recommended Hardware Color: Satin Chrome standard. 7 additional custom order finishes available. Required Installation Kit Includes: • 2 Packs of Shims • 4 Heavy Duty Jamb Screws • Backer Rod • 1 Tube Acoustical Sealant Lead Time: Typically 3-4 weeks. Please check with our professional sales associate to verify actual lead time. STANDARD HARDWARE O Venice - Venice - Thumb Turn Deadbolt Keyed Deadbolt Venice - Passage Only Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Products • Sonex™ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles S Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics * Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Lar^e or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North • Suite 201 • Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com Vie Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Probiem f •mm I m m a#' ■-«;■! i ( • >2-3/4" Door Thickness Mortise Drop Seal & Strike Plate . t Exposed Jam Kit .jibILn Double Door Window Lite Kit Wood Caps over Jam Kit Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Producls • Sonex^ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics * Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers * Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • AccHJStical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA. FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Sile Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Lai^e or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com ■ TM We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem CI3 1Left Hond Swing Left Hand Swing Right Hand Swing I INTERIORINTERIOR t sD EXTERIOREXTERIOR Left Hand Active - Double Door Right Hand Active - Double Door • Soundproofing Products • Sonex^ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures * Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection * Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Roor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • /^oustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA. ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted ft,(S Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem dBA Panels - Sound Silencer" (Diffuser Blocking Absorber) Acoustical Wall Panels and Ceiling Tiles The New dBA Panels Offer Sound Blocking, Sound Absorption and Sound Diffusion ALL IN ONE UNIT. Product Features: • 1 installation required. Unlike traditional products which require 3 separate installations to meet the performance of the dBA panel. • Class A Fire Retardant • No Fiberglass • Non-fibrous • Moisture Resistant Indoor • Impact Resistant • Water Resistant • Non-abrasive Surface • Both STC and NRC Ratings and Diffuser • Tackable Surface • Bacteria and Fungi Resistant • Lightweight dBA stands for Diffuser Blocking Absorber. Our dBA panels are available in 1" and 2" thickness. Panei size is 2' x 2'. dBA is intended for wall or ceiling applications. dBA is an innovative sound treatment panel for both home theaters and professional grade commercial studios. No longer will you have to struggle to figure out noise reduction coefficients or calculate the amount of sabins for a given space. All the guesswork will be eliminated. The new dBA panels offer sound blocking, sound absorption and sound diffusion all in one unit. This will all be accom­ plished with our new tri-functional wall and ceiling panel. These panels have a unique design that not only provides a wide array of acoustical characteristics, but it is aesthetically pleasing and will give any studio or home theater that polished professional look. As it stands, the new dBA panels will come in white or charcoal only, but as the line expands so will the color choices. Keep in mind these panels can be painted to match any decor, (ask for acoustical painting instructions). MATERIAL: Semi Rigid Non-Abrasive Porous Expanded Polypropylene (P.E.P.P.). Acoustical Bead Board. PATTERN: dBA-1 and dBA-2 Custom Patterns Available for Truck Load Quantities. FEATURES: Lightweight, Impact Resistant, Moisture, Bacteria & Fungi Resistant, Tackable Surface. APPLICATIONS: Home Theaters, Recording Studios, Commercial Sound, Pro Audio Application , Ceiling Tiles or any Acoustical Venue. THICKNESS: 1“ &2". SIZES: Nominal 2' x 2' & 2' x 4'. COLOR: White, Charcoal. FLAMMABILITY: ASTM E84, Class A. 1": Flame Spread: 3, Smoke Developed: 84. 2": Flame Spread: 5, Smoke Developed: 113. INSTALLATION: Noise S.T.O.P. Acoustical Adhesive, Standard T-bar grid. Mechanical Fasteners. r if; mmy ■V m i X Charcoal - Actual Size White- Actual Size • Soundproofing Products • Sonex"' Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & \^ll Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control * Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products * Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acousbcal Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA. FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email; sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com -ound imnsmission Obscuring I'roducts We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problems SoundBreak® XP® Soun0reakXP Gypsum Board SoundBreak XP Acoustically Enhanced Gypsum Board • Superior Sound Damping • Acoustical Enhanced for High Rated STC Wall Assemblies • Mold/Mildew/Moisture Resistant • Approved For Use on Walls and Ceilings Heavy Abrasion Mold and Moisture ResisIsnt Face Paper Viscoelastic Polymer Soundbreak XP Gypsum Board is an acoustically enhanced gypsum board used in the construction of high STC wall assemblies. This innovative gypsum board allows for construction of high STC wall assemblies that are thinner, cost effective and more reliable than traditional methods for constructing these types of assemblies. SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board has an acoustically enhanced, high density gypsum core encased in a heavy, abrasion and mold/mildew/moisture resistant, 100% recycled, purple paper on both sides. Used in construction of high rated STC wall assemblies, SoundBreak XP consists of a layer of viscoelastic damping polymer sandwiched between two pieces of high density mold resistant gypsum board, providing constrained layer damping. Heavy Abrasion Mold and Moisture Rescstani Bad( Paper Enhanced High Density Mold Resistant Core MARKET TRENDS DRIVING THE NEED FOR HIGHER RATED STC WALL PARTITIONS Increasing land costs have resulted in larger amounts of high density multi-family housing in a growing number of United States housing markets. The result of high density housing is individual living units positioned closer together than traditional single-family housing. Home theatre systems are becoming more prevalent in use and sophistication, resulting in the potential for more noise being transmitted between wall partitions. Commercial buildings such as schools, hospitals and hotels also have an increasing need to control sound between areas of a building. All of these changing market dynamics have resulted in an increased need for higher rated Sound Transmission Class (STC) wall partitions, which reduce the transmission of air­ borne sound between living spaces within buildings. Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Products • Sonex™ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems * Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Rre Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives * Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices * OSHA, FDA. ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small * Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc.A Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 ‘Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.comS.T0.P ransnisaksi bsctaing We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem FEATURES/BENEFITS • Resists the growth of mold per ASTM G 21 with a score of 0, the best possible score. • Resists the growth of mold per ASTM D 3272 with a score of 10, the best possible score. • Use of SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board results in wail partitions with high rated STC values that are thinner than traditionally built high rated STC wall partitions providing increased usable floor space. • Superior sound damping, cost-efficient material that is easily finished and decorated in the same manner as standard gypsum board. • All SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board designs were tested by an independent third-party acoustical laboratory using the full-scale ASTM E90 test procedure. • Heavy abrasion resistant paper and denser core provide greater resistance to surface abuse and indentation when tested in accordance with ASTM C 1629. • Features a smooth, heavy face paper that is highly resistant to scuffing and provides a superior surface for decoration. • 5/8" SoundBreak XP features a fire resistant Type X core and is UL Classified and approved for inclusion In specific UL fire-rated designs. • SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board is GREENGUARD Children & Schools*” Certified for indoor air quality. • Approved for use on walls and ceilings. LIMITATIONS • Exposure to excessive or continuous moisture and extreme temperatures should be avoided. SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board is not recommended where it will be exposed to temperatures exceeding 125°F (52°C) for extended periods of time. • Installing SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board panels over an insulating blanket, installed continuously across the face of the framing members, is not recommend ed. Blankets should be recessed and flanges attached to the sides of the studs. • SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board must be stored off the ground and under cover. Sufficient risers must be used to ensure support for the entire length of the gypsum board to prevent sagging. • SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board must be kept dry to minimize the potential for mold growth. Adequate care should be taken while transporting, storing, applying and maintaining SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board. For additional information, refer to the Gypsum Association publication, "Guidelines for the Prevention of Mold Growth on Gypsum Board” (GA-238-03), which is available at gypsum.org under the “Download Free Gypsum Association Publications" section. ACCESSORIES • Fasteners: Drywall Screws or Nails • Joint Tape • Joint Compound • Cornerbead • Trims • Casing Beads • Acoustical Sealant • Acoustical Putty Pads / - Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Products • Sonex™ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels * Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) * Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small * Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North 'Suite 201 'Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS IN ACOUSTICAL WALL PARTITIONS The goal of a high rated STC wall partition is to decrease the amount of sound transmission through the partition. The following five variables can have impact on the ability of the partition to provide this loss. Mass Increasing the mass of a wall partition increases the amount of sound transmission loss. Increasing mass in a cost and space effective way can be a challenge. Stiffness Increasing the stiffness of a wall parfition will decrease the amount of sound transmission loss. For that reason metal studs outperform wood studs, and 24" o.c. framing spacing outperforms 16" o.c. framing spacing. Damping Introduction of damping will increase the amount of sound transmission loss. In particular, constrained layer damping can be effective for structure type applications. Cavity Depth Increasing the depth of the cavity of the partition can increase the amount of sound transmission loss, espe­ cially when the cavity is filled with acoustical insulation. Cavity Absorption Adding sound-absorbing material such as fiberglass or mineral fiber insulation to the cavity of a partition will increase the amount of sound transmission loss. The sound-absorbing material should completely fill the cavity but not be compacted or compressed in any way. WHAT iS AN ACCEPTABLE STC RATING FOR A WALL PARTITION? National Research Council of Canada Survey • 600 multi-family residences (300 party walls between them) • Residents with lower STC rated walls are more likely to; o Want to move o Be awakened by noises o Have trouble falling asleep due to noises o Think neighbors are less considerate GENERAL SURVEY CONCLUSIONS • STC> 55 - A realistic goal for acceptable sound insulation • STCa 60 - More ideal, would practically eliminate negative effects of noise from neighbors • Music related sounds may require the highest rated walls J.S. Bradley, Deriving Acceptable Values for Party Wall Sound Insulation survey results HOW SOUNDBREAK XP GYPSUM BOARD WORKS AHigh density core provides increased mass I Vi scoelasUc potymer provides constrained layer damp! ng :i Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Products • Sonex"' Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners * Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products * Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) * Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc.A Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 • Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.comS.T0.P rjniiSssion bscvSig We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND REFERENCES ASTMC1396 ASTMC1629 ASTM C 840 ASTM D 3273 ASTM G 21 Gypsum Association GA-216 Gypsum Association GA-214 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Thickness, nominal 1/2” Regular (12.7 mm) »8” Type X (15.9 mm) 4'4'Width, nominal (1219 mm)(1219 mm) 8' through 1Z (2438 mm - 3657 mm)_________ 8' through 1Z (2438 mm - 3657 mm)_________ Length, standard Weight, Ibs./sq. ft, nominal 2.3 2.3 Surface Burning Characteristics (per ASTM E 64) Flame Spread: 15 Smoke Developed: Flame Spread: 15 Smoke Developed: 00 Surface Abrasion Resistance (per ASTM C 1629)_________ Level 3 Level 3 Indentation Resistance (per ASTM C 1629) Level 1 Level 1 Soft Body Impact Resistance (per ASTM C 1629)________ Level 1 Level 1 Continued on next page... * Soundproofing Products • Sonex*** Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & V^^fl Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection * Moisture & impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels * Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com B TM We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem 1/2" REGULAR GYPSUM BOARD PARTITIONS — WOOD FRAMING srcTest No.Description SINGLE LAYER > 2X4 STUDS 341/2" Regular Gypsum Board vertically applied to NBC-W1 b each side of 2x4 studs 16* o.c. with 1-1/4* type Wscrews 12* o.c. Joints staggered on opposite side. 3* glass fber insulation in studl cavi^. 1/2" SOUNDBREAK XP GYPSUM BOARD PARTITIONS — WOOD FRAMING Test No.STCDescription SINGLE LAYER - 2X4 STUDS 1/2* SoundBreakXP Gypsum Board vertically NGC 2009027 49 applied to one side of 2x4 studs 24* o.c. with 1- 1/4* type W screws 12* o.c. 1/2* Standard Gypsum Board vertically applied to opposite side with 1-1/4* type W screws 12* o.c. Joints staggered on opposite side. 3* glass fiberinsulation in sti^ cavity. UNBALANCED-2X4STUDS NGC 2009028 51Base layer of 1/2* Standard Gypsum Board vertically applied to one side of 2x4 studs 24* o.c. with 1-1/4* type W screws 24* o.c. Face layer of 1/2" SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board vertically applied with 1-5/8* type W screws 12* o.c. 1/2* Standard Gypsum Board vertically to opposite side with 1-1/4* type Wscrews 12* o.c. Joints staggered each layer and opposite sides. 3* glass fiber insulation in stud cavity. 5/B" SOUNDBREAK XP GYPSUM BOARD PARTITIONS — WOOD FRAMING STCTost No.DescriptionFire Rating SINGLE LAYER - 2X4 STUDS RAL TL-07-145 535i'B* SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board vcrticalhy applied to each side of ^4 studs spaced 24” o.c. with 1-1.''4” type Wscrews 12” o.c. 3-1.''2” glass fiber in stud cavity. 1 hr. Ref. Design No. UL U309 Continued on next page... * Soundproofing Products • Sonex™ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection ♦ Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives ♦ Outdoor Noise Control ♦ Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment ♦ No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted f Acoustical Surfaces, Inc.Itcousticai Surfaces, Inc.SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North • Suite 201 • Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email: sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com&T0.P ransRiisskvi bscurtug We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem UNBALANCED STAGGERED - 2X4 STUDS Base layer 5''6’Firc-Resistarce Rated Gypsum RALTL-Q7-17Q 60 Board vertically applied to staggered 2x4 studs spaced 16' o.c. or 2x6 plates with 1 -1.''4’ typo W screws 12' o.c. Face layer of S'B’ SourdBreak XP vertically applied with 2' type W screws 16' o.c. S'B' Fire-Res is tare e Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied to opposite side with 1 •1.^4' type W screws 12' o.c. Vertical joints staggered 16' each layer ard opposite sides. 2-1.i'2' glass fiber in stud cavity. 1 hr. I'lr»i Rof. Design No. GA Basedon VVP3514 UNBALANCED DOUBLE ROW-2X4 STUDS t Base layer S'B'Fire-Resistance Rated Gypsum RAL TL-07-147 64 Board vertically applied to double row of 2xA studs spaced 16' o.c. on separate plates with 1 • 1.'4' type W screws 12' o.c. Face layer of 5^8' SourdBreak XP vertically applied with 2' type W screws 16' o.c. S'B' Fire-Resistance Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied to opposite side with 1 -1.^4' type W scre^vs 12' o.c. Vertical joints staggered 16' each layer and opposite skies. 3- 1.'2' glass fiber in stud cavity. 1 hr.mm, mumi mm Ref. Design No. GA Based or WP3514 H-STUD AREA SEPARATION WALL NRCC B-3451.1 672 hr. Two layers of 1’ Fire-Shield Shaflliner inserted in 2' H-studs spaced 24' o.c. Minimium 3'4’ air space bchveen shaftliner ard adjacent construcfior. 5'B' Soundbreak XP Gypsum Board vertically applied to outside of 2x4 studs spaced 16’o.c. with 1-1.'4' typeW screws 12' o.c. 3-1/2'glass fiber in stud cavity. Ref. Design No. UL U347 5/8" SOUNDBREAK XP GYPSUM BOARD PARTITIONS — STEEL FRAMING STCTest No.DescriptionFire Rating SINGLE LAYER - 3-5/6" STUDS t S'B' SourdBreak XP Gypsum Board vertically applied to one side of 3-5''B' steel studs 24' o.c. with 1' type S scre»vs B’ o.c. at perimeter and 12' o.c. in thiC field. 6''B' Fire-Resistance Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied to opposite side with 1' ty pe S screws 6' o.c. at perimeter and 12' o.c. in the field. Joints staggered on opposite side. 3-1/2' glass fiber in stud cavity. RAL TL-07-3S9 54j1 hr.mimimmmimm1 Ref.Design No. U465UL Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Products * Sonex^ Ceiling & Wall Panels * Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures * Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels * Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted 1 Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Emaii: saies@acousticaisurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticaisurfaces.com We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem UNBALANCED - 3-5f6 STUDS Bas c lay cr &'B’ SouridBrcak XP Gyps u m Board RAL TL-06-334 57 vertically applied to 3-5/B' steel studs spaced 24' o.c. with r type S screws 24’ o.c. Face layer 5'B’ Fire-Rcsistap.ee Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied with 1 -Bi'B' type S screws 12' o.c. 5/B’ Fire-Resistaace Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied to opposite side with 1' type S screws 12’ o.c. Vertical joints staggered 24’ each layer and opposite sides. 3-1/2' glass fiber in stud cavity. 1 hr. mimmviMism. Ref.Design No. UL465UL DOUBLE LAYER - 3-S/6 STUDS RAL TL-07-16B 60Base layer S/S' Soundbreak XP Gypsum Board vertically applied to 3-5'B’ steel studs spaced 24’ o.c. Two layers S'B’ Fire-Resistance Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied to opposite side. Base layer attached with 1’ type S screws 24* o.c. Face layer attached with 1 -S'B’ type S screws 12* o.c. Vertical joints staggered 24* each layer and opposite sides. 3-1/2’ glass fiber in stud cavity. 2 hr. Design No. V4B4 Ref. UL DOUBLE LAYER - 6"STUDS NRCC B-3456.2 612 hr. B-ase layer 5/B’ SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board vertically applied to 6* steel studs spaced 24' o.c. with 1’ type S screws 24’ o.c. Face layer 5i'B* Fire-Resistance Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied with 1 -S/B’ type S screws 12* o.c. Two layers 5/B' Fire-Resistance Rated Gypsum Board vertically applied to opposite side. Base layer attached v/ith 1 ’ type S screws 24' o.c. Face layer attached with 1-5'B’ type S screws 12’ o.c. Vertical joints staggered 24* each layer and opposite sides. 6* glass fiber in stud cavity. Design No. V4B4 Ref. UL UNBALANCED DOUBLE ROW-2-1/2'‘ STUDS NGC20GB036 591 hr.Base layer 5/B’ SoundBreak XP Gypsum Board applied vertically to double rm/ of 2-1/2’ steel studs 24’ o.c. with 1’ type S screv/s 8’ o.c. at perimeter and 12* o.c. in the field. Face layer 5'B' Fire-Resistance Rated Gypsum Board applied vertically to opposite side with 1* type S screws 8’ o.c. at perimeter and 12' o.c. in the field. Joints sta^ered on opposite side. 3’ glass fiber or mineral wool insulation in stud cavity. n Ref.Design No. UL V4SB Continued on next page... • Soundproofing Producls • Sonex™ Ceiling & Wall Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer AcousUcal Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Producls • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives • Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA. ADA Compliance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design & Consulting • Large Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted \ Acoustical Surfaces, Inc. SOUNDPROOFING, ACOUSTICS, NOISE & VIBRATION CONTROL SPECIALISTS 123 Columbia Court North ‘Suite 201 ‘Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 448-5300 • Fax (952) 448-2613 • (800) 448-0121 Email; sales@acousticalsurfaces.com Visit our Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com We Identify and S.T.O.P. Your Noise Problem Note; In nulti-layer systems, SouncBreak XP Gypsum Boarc can be usee as eithier a face layer or a base layer without affecting thic STC Rating. UL Listed Assemblies Ihio 5,.'6" SouncBreak XP Gypsum Boarc is testec in accorcance with ASTM Stancarc E 119 anc is classified as Type X for use in the following UL listings: UOl’/, U301, U302, U30S, U309. U326, U330, U332, U336, U339, U341, U342, U3S1, U3S4, U3Sb. U3S6, U3S7, U3bG, U360, U364, U368, U369, U3/1, U3/9, U392, U40S, U411, U41E, U420, U42b, U426, U429, U434, U439, U449, U4b0, U460, U46b, U466, U42b, 046/. U494, U499, UbOb, Ub24, Ub2b, Ub31, U646, U64/, U646, U649, U6bl, U6b2, U926, V406, V41b, V419, V420, V421, V42b, V430, V432, V433, V434, V43b, V436, V449, V4S0, V486, V483, V484, V4B8 UL Core Designation b./G'' SouncBreak XP Gypsum Boarc: SounoBreak XP • Soundproofing Products • Sonex™ Ceiling & Vfell Panels • Sound Control Curtains • Equipment Enclosures • Acoustical Baffles & Banners • Solid Wood & Veneer Acoustical Ceiling & Wall Systems • Professional Audio Acoustics • Vibration & Damping Control • Fire Retardant Acoustics • Hearing Protection • Moisture & Impact Resistant Products • Floor Impact Noise Reduction • Sound Absorbers • Noise Barriers • Fabric Wrapped Wall Panels • Acoustical Foam (Egg Crate) • Acoustical Sealants & Adhesives * Outdoor Noise Control • Assistive Listening Devices • OSHA, FDA, ADA Compfiance • On-Site Acoustical Analysis • Acoustical Design 4 Consulting • Lai^e Inventory • Fast Shipment • No Project too Large or Small • Major Credit Cards Accepted OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Josh & Holly Burke 43931 355*^ St. Ottertail, MN 56571 APPLICANT: September 11,2013, at 6:30 P.M. Commissioner's Room, Government Services Center West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 HEARING DATE/LOCATION: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUEST (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): l am requesting the approval of Pawz Plaza; a Dog & Cat Boarding, grooming and daycare facility. A total of 9 doggie-rooms and 3 kitty cottages would be available for reservation and/or daycare. Personal one-on-one care would be available; if needed, 24/7 to the pets but office hours would be as follows: M - F: Sam - 6pm, Saturday: Sam - 3pm, Sunday: Sam - Spm. Appropriate Signage; one lighted: proposed location on side of business building & 1 non-lighted at driveway entrance. Lighting is also being requested: lighting of signage and 1 yard light, along with a concrete sidewalk, holding tank and outdoor fenced-in play area(s). Waste would be collected and disposed of properly twice a week at minimum. Also, a rail fence located from the parking area to entry door of facility creating a barrier from Hwy 7S. Just in case; dogs especially, slipped off leash or got away from their Mums & Dads. Project proposed and projected to be completed by Spring of 2014, LAKE NAME/NUMBER/CLASS: Otter Tail River (56-OTR), Transition E-911 ADDRESS: 43931 355*^ St. Klinger’s Riverside Lot 9 ex pt E of Hwy, Section 27 of RushLEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lake Township " Weather Conditions may change the Hearing date and time. If bad weather occurs, please listen to the local Fergus Falls Radio Stations or contact the Land & Resource Management Office, by 4:30 p.m., for possible rescheduling of the Hearing.____________________________________________________________ The above Applicant has made Application to the Otter Tail County Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit as per the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Details of the Application are available for viewing at the Land & Resource Management Office, Government Services Center 540 West Fir, Fergus Falls, MN 56537. Any comments regarding this request may be expressed at the Hearing or mailed to the Land & Resource Management Office at the above address. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS SHOULD CONTACT THE LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HEARING. August 28, 2013Bert Olson t illi. Mailing Date.Chairman Planning Commission • / SEP 0 -5 2013 ^ ^ ^SOUf^CE V -yuu 0— ’t @ ~tj^^ ..MLA. /> /^l(j£ Hjb^A 6ur /i o/Y\e^-~l^jiM s^~:^ /f7^.~0fiTT-, /f^iv ~h (ytJek£jS. A-X-Ay, M S/sv^ /m\ Department of LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY Government Services Center - 540 West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 PH: 218-998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.otter-tail.mn.us September 13, 2013 Josh & Holly Burke 43931 355‘^ St Ottertail, MN 56571 RE: Conditional Use Permit Application, Otter Tail River (56-OTR) Josh & Holly Burke; On September 11, 2013, the Planning Commission passed a motion to table your request. Their motion is as follows: A motion by Trites, second by Bailey to table, at the Applicants request, to the October 9, 2013 Meeting, to allow time for the Applicant to address the potential noise (decibel) level(s); in order to make notice of the tabling & to inform of the change from 9 doggie-rooms & 3 kitty-cottages (12 total) to 15 doggie-rooms; the Land & Resource Office must resend notification. If you have any questions, please contact our Office. Sincerely, f. Marsha Bowman Recording Secretary /f* 5 U j X • Vi Wi^l to 0'd<i'^^^5 Y~4^ *novS6'"/ Lm^%l tk d^v^j^.y otter Tail County, Planning Commission September 11,2013, Page 2 Otter Tail Beach Club Inc., Joe Swanqier - Approved As Requested: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Joe Swangler (Unit B) - Cover existing roof with 2x4 purling, steel sheeting. Total rise of 6”. The project is located in Pt of GLs 3 & 5 (2.5 AC), Section 12 of Amor Township: Otter Tail Lake (56-242), GD. Tom Heinze represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Boyer second by Gill to approve as requested. Voting: All Members in favor. Mike & Andrea Tauer - Approved As Requested: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): Replace existing retaining walls. Walls to be replaced with SRW block in same position and same relative height and length. Lower deck proposed to be replaced with pavers. Changes to existing deck and stairways detailed on plans. The project is located on Lenius Beach 1®' Addition Lot 18 & pt Lot 19, Section 3 of Edna Township: Little McDonald Lake (56-328), GD. Mike Tauer and Scott Orvik represented the Application. Motion: A motion by Gill, second by Bailey to approve as requested, provided: 1. Land & Resource approves the erosion control plan. 2. The designing engineer signs-off on the completed project. Voting: All Members in favor, except Boyer. Josh & Holly Burke - Tabled To October 9, 2013: A Conditional Use Permit Application (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): I am requesting the approval of Pawz Plaza: a Dog & Cat Boarding, grooming and daycare facility. A total of 9 doggie-rooms and 3 kitty cottages would be available for reservation and/or daycare. Personal one-on-one care would be available: if needed, 24/7 to the pets but office hours would be as follows: M - F: Sam - 6pm, Saturday: Sam - 3pm, Sunday: Sam - 8pm. Appropriate Signage: one lighted: proposed location on side of business building & 1 non-lighted at driveway entrance. Lighting is also being requested: lighting of signage and 1 yard light, along with a concrete sidewalk, holding tank and outdoor fenced-in play area(s). Waste would be collected and disposed of properly twice a week at minimum. Also, a rail fence located from the parking area to entry door of facility creating a barrier from Hwy 78. Just in case: dogs especially, slipped off leash or got away from their Mums & Dads. Project proposed and projected to be completed by Spring of 2014. The project is located on Klinger’s Riverside Lot 9 ex pt E of Hwy, Section 27 of Rush Lake Township: Otter Tail River (56-OTR), Transition. Holly & Josh Burke represented the Application. Barry & Lynda Stewart had questions regarding the number of proposed dogs, noise, waste & flies. Motion: A motion by Trites, second by Bailey to table, at the Applicants request, to the October 9, 2013 Meeting, to allow time for the Applicant to address the potential noise (decibel) level(s): in order to make notice of the tabling & to inform of the change from 9 doggie-rooms & 3 kitty-cottages (12 total) to 15 doggie-rooms: the Land & Resource Office must resend notification. Voting: All Members in favor. Adjourn: At 8:30 P.M., Acting Chairman Wilson set the Meeting. The next Meeting is scheduled for 6:30 P.M. on October 9, 2013. Respectfully submitted. A Marsha Bowman Recording Secretary OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This Request Was Tabled by the Planning Commission on September 11, 2013 APPLICANT:Josh & Holly Burke 43931 355'^ St. Ottertail, MN 56571 HEARING DATE/LOCATION:October 9, 2013, at 6:30 P.M. Commissioner's Room, Government Services Center West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ORIGINAL REQUEST (as stated by the Applicant on the Application): I am requesting the approval of Pawz Plaza; a Dog & Cat Boarding, grooming and daycare facility. A total of 9 doggie-rooms and 3 kitty cottages would be available for reservation and/or daycare. Personal one-on-one care would be available; if needed, 24/7 to the pets but office hours would be as follows: M - F: Sam - 6pm, Saturday: Sam - 3pm, Sunday: Sam - Spm. Appropriate Signage; one lighted: proposed location on side of business building & 1 non- lighted at driveway entrance. Lighting is also being requested: lighting of signage and 1 yard light, along with a concrete sidewalk, holding tank and outdoor fenced-in play area(s). Waste would be collected and disposed of properly twice a week at minimum. Also, a rail fence located from the parking area to entry door of facility creating a barrier from Hwy 7S. Just in case; dogs especially, slipped off leash or got away from their Mums & Dads. Project proposed and projected to be completed by Spring of 2014. SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION: Amotion byTrites, second by Bailey to table, at the Applicants request, to the October 9, 2013 Meeting, to allow time for the Applicant to address the potential noise (decibel) level(s); in order to make notice of the tabling & to inform of the change from 9 doggie-rooms & 3 kitty-cottages (12 total) to 15 doggie-rooms; the Land & Resource Office must resend notification. LAKE NAME/NUMBER/CLASS: Otter Tail River (56-OTR), Transition E-911 ADDRESS: 43931 355'^ St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Township Klinger’s Riverside Lot 9 ex pt E of Hwy, Section 27 of Rush Lake ” Weather Conditions may change the Hearing date and time. If bad weather occurs, please listen to the local Fergus Falls Radio Stations or contact the Land & Resource Management Office, by 4:30 p.m., for possible rescheduling of the Hearing. The above Applicant has made Application to the Otter Tail County Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit as per the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Details of the Application are available for viewing at the Land & Resource Management Office, Government Services Center 540 West Fir, Fergus Falls, MN 56537. Any comments regarding this request may be expressed at the Hearing or mailed to the Land & Resource Management Office at the above address. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS SHOULD CONTACT THE LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICE PRIOR TO THE HEARING. Bert Olson September 25, 2013 Chairman Planning Commission Mailing Date ''CANrD OTTER TAIL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION County of Otter Tail, Government Services Center, 540 West Fir, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 218-998-8095 AGENDA FOR OCTOBER 9, 2013 6:30 P.M. Roll Call / Approval of Minutes “Haggart’s Second Addition”, Carmon & Carole Lynnes Preliminary Plat Dunn Twp/ Sec 4 Pelican Lake Old Business (09/11/13) Rush Lake Twp/ Sec 27 Josh & Holly Burke Otter Tail River Ron & Kim Burd Big Pine Lake Corliss Twp/ Sec 31 Edna Twp/ Sec 18 Interim Use Cluster Development Big McDonald LakeBig McDonald Resort Chad & Lisa Gabrielson tiCANItC LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY, GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL ) I, Marsha Bowman, duly appointed and Acting Secretary of the Otter Tail County Planning Commissi^ for Otter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that onAE^day of -----, 2013, the attached Notice of Hearing and was duly served upon the following: County Sheriff County Highway Engineer the. Courthouse Otter Tail COLA, PO Box 53, Ottertail City, MN 56571 MPCA, 714 Lake Ave., Suite 220, Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 DNR, Julie Aadland, Div. Eco & Water Resources, 1509 1st Ave N, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Shawn Donais, DNR, Trails & Waterways Jim Wolters, DNR, Div. of Fisheries Doug Hedtke, DNR, Div. of Wildlife Planning Commission Members (The above receive aU Notices) Lake Improvement District (if projgetl^ocated on their lake, mail Notices to theJ-atCe fmprovement District) Devils (Near Perham); DgvtfiLake Imp. Dist., %Jeana M Nelson, 40§St7Wovilla Rd, Perham, MN 5687^-8629 Little McDonald, Kerb>8r^ul: LMKP Lakes Imp. Dist., PO B^x-TSsTperham, MN 56573 Pine Lakes Imp. Dist., PO Bo^t-^dSTPerham, MN 56573 Pelicarr^^^h, Bass & Little Pelican: Pelican Lakej3foup Lake Imp. Dist., %Fred MapdH 26271 Otoson RD, Detroit Lakes MN 56501 Soutn Turtle Lake: South Turtle Lake ItpcTDist., %Bricker& Janet Johnsen,-31790 Turtle Shore Ln, Underwood, MN 56586 Same Envelope Little Pine & Bij 'me: City Clerk (if located within 2 miles of a city) *s^NDOT Dist Officp mnn Hwy 1Q^, DetrojLLat^, N/lN^565mXiLlecaT5tN^^a^taie>erF^dJjwy) Adjac^t Co^v ZoDiaa-AdnTTrrtstpalor (If the CoLiotv-je-tn-the "Buffet) - check thelrwebsite for name/address 'Slacker County Aijditef-fnOTiT\rirra^itionT6^^ Znnino-AdrnfnlgtTator) - cfaeetrthglT^websrtg'fQr name/afkirESi; Per BK, do not notify individuals within a City Limit Township Clery Lake As^)<ciation, surJ)i^^or (if appropriate), "andinSselisfed on the atta^ed sheet..., by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing them in the U.S. Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, properly addressed to each of the above named at the addresses shown aboverc. A Secretary If parcel owner is “USA”, mail to Fish & Wildlife Service, 18965 Co. Hwy 82, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 If parcel owner is “DNR”, ignore as they are receiving a notice as stated above If parcel owner is “St. of MN. 375 Centennial Bldg. Spec Asst, to Atty General St. Paul, MN “, mail to DNR Lands & Minerals 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd NE Bemidji, MN 56601 PC Affidavit 05-2013 PLANNING COMMISSION NOTIFICATION WORKSHEET Applicant: U,,9o/3- OT/l Meeting Date:Lake: Date Assigned:Assigned To: Completed:Return By: V2 Mile (2640’) Preliminary PlatV4 Mile (1320’) Conditional Use App *Township / County Roads: Sherry (CIS) will get map, listing, labels (she has an advanced mapping system), unless it is adjacent to the parcel(s) that run the length of the road project. Be sure to list the road name(s) and the parcel number(s) involved with the project on this sheet for Sherry. \MtLuAjLA) -t fiuuU iwJu^~Th^ MjuIl, doUfjMj. Iij PdUtkd/mj UAlA) 5 kS 75 tlHUAJ djit^ OUa^OAkju^ fijob 4--- ■ • ' ■V PC:Worksheet Notification 09/08 Planning Commission County of Otter Tail Government Services Cen*. r 540 West Fir Fergus Falls MN 5653T ^ ® POSTAGE»pitneyBOWES■X. # i $ 000.46°ZIP 56537 02 in1: 0001377350 AUG 28 2013^-C£/i/£-q SEPn Ma/0 THOMAS M JACOB 141 MINNETONKA BLVD EXCELSIOR MK r r oi nr\n OOG9/Q3/13FE 1009553NIXIE RETURN TO AFNDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNASLE TO FORWARD *n435-n7A3fi-78~3RBT: BBS 37135440 B533rmH%^i Buffer Parcels Parcel No Addr 1Name 1 Addr 2Name 2 Citv St Zip 53000260161000 RD OFFUTT CO FARGO ND 58106 7160PO BOX 7160 53000260162000 WESLEY G & THERESA JELTEMA 35671 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 53000260164000 LARRY & PATRICIA SANDBERG 44026 BREEZY LN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9429 tJ>53000260165000 DENNIS D & PATRICIA SAUNDERS 804 16TH ST N BLAIR NE 68008 1221 53000260165001 DONALD S & LISA M NICHOLSON 386 MEADOW LN YOUNG AMERICA MN 55397 4508 53000260166000 RYAN L & ALEXANDRA E ZIEMANN 3576SUNBURYDR WOODBURY MN 55125 2839 53000260168000 JERRY L & MAGGIE JACOBS 343 PIERCE ST NE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 2511 53000260168001 THOMAS J & KELLY J BRUSKI 7951 COREY PATH INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55076 53000260169000 PUBLIC ACCESS 00 53000260170000 ANNA MARIE BAARSON ET AL 13797 FAIRLAWNAVE APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 7926 53000260170001 STATE OF MINNESOTA ATTN TAX SPECIALIST 500 LAFAYETTE RD PO BOX 45 SAINT PAUL MN 55155 4045 53000260171000 MANTEUFFEL PROPERTIES LLC 35338 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9447 53000260173000 JUNE HURTT ET AL 1798 W 28TH ST N NEWTON lA 50208 8813 53000260174001 MAURICE & LOUISE A LUND 1907 LAMESA DR DODGE CITY KS 67801 6420 53000260174003 DELORIS D LACHOWITZER 35816 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9428 53000260175000 JUNE HURTT ET AL 1798 W 28TH ST N NEWTON lA 50208 8813 53000260176000 WAYNE & DIANNE WITKOWSKI 35852 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9428 53000260177000 HENRY & RUTHENE SMITH TST 618 15TH ST N BLAIR NE 68008 1212 53000260178000 DANIEL H & DIANE R MEYER PO BOX 252 WEST FARGO ND 58078 0252 53000260180000 VIOLA J LONG 723 8TH ST S CLINTON lA 52732 5603 53000260185001 DAYAKE LTD PARTNERSHIP ATTN MAUREEN NIMIS 1225 TOLLGATE DR OXFORD OH 45056 2003 53000260185003 THOMAS M JACOB 141 MINNETONKABLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 1908 53000260185004 R & L TST 6110 COLFAX LN S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 2214 Tuesdav. AuRUSt 27. 2013 PaRe 1 of 4 Parf:el No Addrl Addr2 Citv St ZiDName 1 Name 2 53000260186900 SIMON A JACOBS TST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418 24782701 ARMOUR TER W 53000270189000 TONY L & MARY J JACOBSON OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942343657 355TH ST 53000270192000 TONY L & MARY J JACOBSON OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942343657 355TH ST 53000270193000 STATE OF MINNESOTA TAX FORFEITED PARCEL 00 53000270194002 M & M DEVELOPMENT LLC BATTLE LAKE MN 56515 928838425 COUNTRY ESTATE RD 53000270194019 DAVID A DONLEY OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9434- 36961 STATE HIGHWAY 78 53000270195000 MELVIN & CAROL MCGOWAN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942535445 438TH AVE 53000270195001 BARRY A & LYNDA M STEWART OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942643848 355TH ST 53000270195002 MELVIN & CAROL MCGOWAN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942535445 438TH AVE 53000270195003 WILLIAM D NELSON OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942535434 438TH AVE 53000270195004 JOHN I & KAREN L NELSON OTTERTAIL MN 56571 946235315 438TH AVE 53000270196000 TONY L & MARY J JACOBSON OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942343657 355TH ST 53000270196001 DANA M & JANA M LOKEN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942343653 355TH ST 53000270203000 JOHN L & DEBORAH L GARNER LA VISTA NE 68128 70806712 HEARTWOOD RD 53000270204000 CARMEN ARCHBOLD ENDERLINND 58027 1357609 CLEVELAND ST 53000270205000 CATHY KNUDSEN WAHPETON ND 58075 96287750 MARIE ST 53000270206000 ROBERT & DONNA ANDERSEN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942443677 HIDDEN TRL 53000270207000 ROBERT & DONNA ANDERSEN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942443677 HIDDEN TRL 53000270208000 ROBERT & DONNA ANDERSEN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942443677 HIDDEN TRL 53000270209000 TERRANCE A DILLING ET AL SAINT PAUL MN 55124 97068011 131ST STW ENDERLIN ND 58027 112753000270210000 LARRY R MUTH ET AL 116 HARRISON ST 53000270211000 RICHARD D SR & LEONE CLARENS FARGO ND 58102 1930417 24TH AVE N 53000270216000 JOSHUA & HOLLY BURKE 43931 355TH ST OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9426 53000270216001 LYLE L & VALERIE J BROCKMAN COUNCIL BLUFFS lA 51501 79652819 SUMMER DR Tuesdav. August 27. 2013 Page 2 of 4 Parcel No Name 1 AddrlName 2 Addr2 Citv St Zip 53000270217000 DANIEL C & JENNIFER WHITNEY 35922 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9445 53000270217009 WILLIAM & NORMA BADE 1668 KIRKHAM DR ARNOLD MO 63010 1926 53000270217901 CAROLYN JOAN ALBERTS 35820 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9445 .■V- . T53000270218002 DELL PROPERTIES 8557 WYOMING AVE N STE 4 BROOKLYN PARK MN 55445 1847i; 53000270218003 KRISTINE L CLUM 214 15THAVES SOUTH SAINT PAUL MN 55075 21 53000270218004 JOHN L BLEICHNER PO BOX 102 PERHAM MN 56573 0102 53000270218005 SUSAN BERGERON K ALBERTS PO BOX 24 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 0024 53000990335000 MARVIN KONRADE PO BOX 566 DODGE CITY KS 67801 0566 53000990335001 MARVIN R & CHARLOTTE KONRADE PO BOX 566 DODGE CITY KS 67801 0566 53000990336000 MARVIN KONRADE PO BOX 566 DODGE CITY KS 67801 0566 53000990337000 WESLEY G & THERESA JELTEMA 35671 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 53000990338000 WESLEY G & THERESA JELTEMA 35671 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 53000990339000 ROBERTA SHERWOOD 211118TH ST N SAINT JOSEPH MO 64505 2141 53000990339001 TODD 0 NILES 21948 MAJOR AVE HUTCHINSON MN 55350 5711 53000990340000 KIM H ZIEMANN 35711 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 53000990341000 WILLIAM J DIEDERICH TST ET AL 7216 ONTARIO ST OMAHA NE 68124 3560 53000990342000 WILLIAM J DIEDERICH TST ET AL 7216 ONTARIO ST OMAHA NE 68124 3560 53000990343000 STEVE & ANDRIA NELSON 6312 BROADWAY ST NW MOORHEAD MN 56560 6369 53000990344000 GAYLE PFLAGER 35617 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 53000990346000 SHARON PUTNAM 35579 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 53000990348000 TODD SWALSTAD 201 2ND ST SHELLY MN 56581 4107 53000990349000 OTTER TAIL COUNTY 510 FIR AVE W FERGUS FALLS MN 56537 1364 53000990349001 DUSTAN L & JODY J DOLL 35523 RUSH UKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 .53000990350000 STATE OF MINNESOTA ATTN TAX SPECIALIST PO BOX 45 SAINT PAUL MN 55155 4045 Tuesdav. August 27.2013 Page 3 of 4 Parcel No 53000990352000 JOSHUA & HOLLY BURKE Addr 2 Citv St ZipAddr 1Name 1 Name 2 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942643931 355TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 560753000990353000 PAUL L ANDERSON 4609 2ND AVE S OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942553000990592000 MANFRED C & SANDRA F BERGSTRO 35420 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942553000990593000 MARILYN J ADAMS 35406 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942553000990594000 RUSSELL D & MARILYN J ADAMS 35406 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942553000990595000 GERALD 0 & MARJORIE J WIDMER 35364 438TH AVE NEW ULM MN 56073 173553000990596000 JAMES & YVONNE FRUHWIRTH 419 MINNESOTA ST N OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942553000990597000 ARTHUR J JOHNSON 35320 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942553000990598000 ARTHUR J JOHNSON 35320 438TH AVE Tuesdav. August 27. 2013 Page 4 of 4 mBuffer Mail Address i Address 2Sort Name City, State, Zip ADAMS,MARILYN J 35406 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 ADAMS,RUSSELL D & MARILYN J 35406 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 ALBERTS,CAROLYN JOAN 35820 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9445 cnALBERTS,SUSAN BERGERON K PO BOX 24 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 0024■ ■y.’ s. . ANDERSEN,ROBERT & DONNA 43677 HIDDEN TRL OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9424 ANDERSON,PAULL 4609 2ND AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 5607 ARCHBOLD,CARMEN 609 CLEVELAND ST ENDERLIN ND 58027 1357 BAARSON,ANNA MARIE ET AL 13797 FAIRLAWN AVE APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 7926 BADE,WILLIAM & NORMA 1668 KIRKHAM DR ARNOLD MO 63010 1926 BERGSTROM,MANFRED C & SANDRA F 35420 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 BLEICHNER,JOHN L PO BOX 102 PERHAM MN 56573 0102 BROCKMAN,LYLE L & VALERIE J 2819 SUMMER DR COUNCIL BLUFFS lA 51501 7965 BRUSKI,THOMAS J & KELLY J 7951 COREY PATH INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55076 BURKE,JOSHUA& HOLLY 43931 355TH ST OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9426 CLARENS,RICHARD D SR & LEONE 417 24TH AVE N FARGO ND 58102 1930 CLUM,KRISTINE L 214 15TH AVE S SOUTH SAINT PAUL MN 55075 213 DAYAKE LTD PARTNERSHIP 1225 TOLLGATE DR OXFORD OH 45056 2003 DELL PROPERTIES 8557 WYOMING AVE N STE 4 BROOKLYN PARK MN 55445 1847 DIEDER1CH,WILLIAM J TST ET AL 7216 ONTARIO ST OMAHA NE 68124 3560 DILLING,TERRANCE A ET AL 8011 131STSTW SAINT PAUL MN 55124 9706 DOLL,DUSTAN L&JODYJ don'ley,david A 35523 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 36961 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9434 Tuesday, August 27, 2013 Page 1 of 3 City, State, ZipAddress 2Address 1Sort Name FRUJHWIRTH,JAMES & YVONNE NEW ULM MN 56073 1735419 MINNESOTA ST N GARNER,JOHN L & DEBORAH L LA VISTA NE 68128 70806712 HEARTWOOD RD NEWTON lA 50208 8813HURTT,JUNE ETAL 1798 W 28TH ST N EXCELSIOR MN 55331 1908JACOB,THOMAS M 141 MINNETONKA BLVD JACOBS,JERRY L & MAGGIE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 2511343 PIERCE ST NE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418 2478JACOBS,SIMON ATST 2701 ARMOUR TER W OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9423JACOBSON,TONY L & MARY J 43657 355TH ST OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427JELTEMA,WESLEY G & THERESA 35671 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425JOHNSON,ARTHURJ 35320 438TH AVE KNUDSEN,CATHY WAHPETON ND 58075 96287750 MARIE ST DODGE CITY KS 67801 0566KONRADE,MARVIN PO BOX 566 KONRADE,MARVIN R & CHARLOTTE DODGE CITY KS 67801 0566PO BOX 566 LACHOWITZER,DELORIS D OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942835816 RUSH LAKE LOOP LOKEN,DANA M & JANA M OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942343653 355TH ST LONG,VIOLAJ CLINTON lA 52732 5603723 8TH ST S DODGE CITY KS 67801 6420LUND,MAURICE& LOUISE A 1907 LAM ESA DR M & M DEVELOPMENT LLC BATTLE LAKE MN 56515 928838425 COUNTRY ESTATE RD MANTEUFFEL PROPERTIES LLC OTTERTAIL MN 56571 944735338 RUSH LAKE LOOP MCGOWAN,MELVIN & CAROL OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942535445 438TH AVE MEYER,DANIELH& DIANE R WEST FARGO ND 58078 0252PO BOX 252 ENDERLIN ND 58027 1127MUTH,LARRYR ETAL 116 HARRISON ST NELSON,JOHN I & KAREN!OTTERTAIL MN 56571 946235315 438TH AVE NELSON,STEVE & ANDRIA MOORHEAD MN 56560 63696312 BROADWAY ST NW Page 2 of 3Tuesday, August 27, 2013 Sort Name Address i Address 2 City, State, Zip NELSON,WILLIAM D 35434 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 NICHOLSON,DONALD S & LISA M 386 MEADOW LN YOUNG AMERICA MN 55397 4508 NILES,TODD O 21948 MAJOR AVE HUTCHINSON MN 55350 5711 OTTER TAIL COUNTY 510 FIR AVE W FERGUS FALLS MN 56537 1364 PFLAGER,GAYLE 35617 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 PUTNAM,SHARON 35579 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 R & L TST 6110 COLFAX LN S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 2214 RD OFFUTT CO PO BOX 7160 FARGO ND 58106 7160 SANDBERG,LARRY & PATRICIA 44026 BREEZY LN OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9429 SAUNDERS,DENNIS D & PATRICIA 804 16TH ST N BLAIR NE 68008 1221 SHERWOOD,ROBERTA 2111 18TH ST N SAINT JOSEPH MO 64505 2141 SMITH,HENRY & RUTHENE TST 618 15TH ST N BLAIR NE 68008 1212 STATE OF MINNESOTA PO BOX 45 SAINT PAUL MN 55155 4045 STATE OF MINNESOTA 500 LAFAYETTE RD PO BOX 45 SAINT PAUL MN 55155 4045 STEWART,BARRY A & LYNDA M 43848 355TH ST OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9426 SWALSTAD,TODD 201 2ND ST SHELLY MN 56581 4107 WHITNEY,DANIEL C & JENNIFER 35922 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9445 WIDMER,GERALD 0 & MARJORIE J 35364 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 WITKOWSKI,WAYNE & DIANNE 35852 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9428 ZIEMANN,KIM H 35711 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 ZIEMANN,RYAN L & ALEXANDRA E 3576 SUNBURYDR WOODBURY MN 55125 2839 Tuesday, August 27, 2013 Page 3 of 3 Page 1 of 1Interactive Land Viewer - Otter Tail County, MN - Bigger - Better - FASTER f A Qnl X ®otter Tail County, MN About Land - Flex Viewer V2.5G -S/ imj.11..! ^ 1l 2003 1992 2012 Fergus Falls 2007 Fergus FallsBasetnap Topo 2010 Photo 2009 2009 1 iIi//:|/530Q02702t?9QI { ■■ C-m L.C'I ttemaam lE f53000270193300 mIS mtmma 53»02?Qia9Ci03 i-r. \mS3t»i:7'321€QQOi3Cid:i27Ql9tiQOO M /I m—-.[ ■ I\\. I I ■■ai3CC27019«)l9 I\ IP-1 tfcSoiwMSHftstsa :IUp 530002 701 I .YU t‘lM5U«U .......,:i. X' S3U(i£;tll miu \ ____ http://www.ottertailcounty.net/flexviewers/land/08/27/2013 LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY, GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL ) I, Marsha Bowman, duly appointed and Acting Secretary of the Otter Tail County Planning Qommissior^or pt the_^5^day of • served upon the following: tter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that on __, 2013, the attached Notice of Hearing and was duly CourthouseCounty Sheriff County Highway Engineer Otter Tail COLA. PO Box 53. Ottertail City. MN 56571 MPCA. 714 Lake Ave.. Suite 220. Detroit Lakes. MN 56501 DNR. Julie Aadland. Div. Eco & Water Resources. 1509 1st Ave N. Fergus Falls. MN 56537 Shawn Donais. DNR. Trails & Waterways Jim Wolters. DNR. Div. of Fisheries Doug Hedtke. DNR. Div. of Wildlife Planning Commission Members (The above receive all Notices) Lake Improvement District (if project is locatedjan^trrair lake, mail Notices to the Lake Improvement District) Devils (Near Perham): Devils LakeJjni5r6i^., %Jeana M Nelson, 40631 Aerovilla Rd^^PefttamTlVIN 56573-8629 Little McDonald, Kerbs & Paul^-^lT^P Lakes Imp. Dist., PO Box 133, Perhanj,J>(1N''’^573 Little Pine & Big Pin^>-'''Pine Lakes Imp. Dist., PO Box 405, Perhai Pelican, FigJ<'6^s & Little Pelican: Pelican Lake Group Lak^-trtfp^ist., %Fred Manuel, 26271^j3t6son RD, Detroit Lakes MN 56501 SotrttTfurtle Lake: South Turtle Lake Imp. DisL^^Bficter & Janet Johnsen, 32790 Turtt^^ore Ln, Underwood, MN 56586 Same Envelope 56573 /iCckjMJUM■City Clerk (if located within 2 miles of a city) MNDOT Dist. Office, 1000 Hwy 10 W, Detror Adjacent County Zoning AdmjriL Becker County Aujlitertfiotify in addition to their Zoning AdjjHilIstrator) - check their website fprliame/address Per BK, do-noTnotify individuals within a City LiniiK^ MN 56501 (if located on a !5r(lf the County is in the “Buffs Fed Hwy) leck their website for nafrle/address d^tion, su]^yor (if appropriate) ^hed sheet....Lake Ass by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing them in the U.S. Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, properly addressed to each of the above named at the addresses shown above. n and Itiusy IISTed on the att Secretary If parcel owner is “USA”, mail to Fish & Wildlife Service, 18965 Co. Hwy 82, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 If parcel owner is “DNR”, ignore as they are receiving a notice as stated above If parcel owner is “St. of MN. 375 Centennial Bldg. Spec Asst, to Atty General St. Paul, MN mail to DNR Lands & Minerals 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd NE Bemidji, MN 56601 PC Affidavit 05-2013 PLANNING COMMISSION NOTIFICATION WORKSHEET Applicant: Meeting Date:Lake: Date Assigned:Assigned To: Completed:Return By: Vs Mile (2640’) Preliminary PlatV4 Mile (1320’) Conditional Use App *Township / County Roads: Sherry (CIS) will get map, listing, labels (she has an advanced mapping system), unless it is adjacent to the parcel(s) that run the length of the road project. Be sure to list the road name(s) and the parcel number(s) involved with the project on this sheet for Sherry. jtu ^ 000 99m. nuhAHJJj) (UJCj, ^/tduyi/tuYUj MiUJpj Viw 53 PC:Worksheet Notification 09/08 Buffer Mail Address i Address 2 City, State, ZipSort Name ADAMS,MARILYN J 35406 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 ^•4ADAMS,RUSSELL D & MARILYN J 35406 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 ALBERTS,CAROLYN JOAN 35820 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9445 </>ALBERTS,SUSAN BERGERON K PO BOX 24 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 0024 ANDERSEN,ROBERT & DONNA 43677 HIDDEN TRL OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9424 V ANDERSON,PAUL L 4609 2ND AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 5607 ARCHBOLD,CARMEN 609 CLEVELAND ST ENDERLIN ND 58027 1357 BAARSON,ANNA MARIE ETAL 13797 FAIRLAWN AVE APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 7926 BADE,WILLIAM & NORMA 1668 KIRKHAM DR ARNOLD MO 63010 1926 BERGSTROM,MANFRED C & SANDRA F 35420 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 BLEICHNER,JOHN L PO BOX 102 PERHAM MN 56573 0102 BROCKMAN,LYLE L & VALERIE J 2819 SUMMER DR COUNCIL BLUFFS lA 51501 7965 BRUSKLTHOMASJ & KELLY J 7951 COREY PATH INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55076 BURKE,JOSHUA& HOLLY 43931 355TH ST OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9426 CLARENS,RICHARD D SR & LEONE 417 24TH AVE N FARGO ND 58102 1930 CLUM,KRISTINE L 214 15TH AVE S SOUTH SAINT PAUL MN 55075 213 DAYAKE LTD PARTNERSHIP 1225 TOLLGATE DR OXFORD OH 45056 2003 DELL PROPERTIES 8557 WYOMING AVE N STE 4 BROOKLYN PARK MN 55445 1847 DIEDERICH,WILLIAM J TST ET AL 7216 ONTARIO ST OMAHA NE 68124 3560 DILLING,TERRANCE AETAL 8011 131STST W SAINT PAUL MN 55124 9706 DOLL,DUSTAN L& JODY J DOrTLEY,DAVID A 35523 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427 36961 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9434 Wedpesday, September 18, 2013 Page 1 of 3 Sort Name City, State, ZipAddress 2Address 1 NEW ULM MN 56073 1735FRl^HWIRTH,JAMES & YVONNE GARNER,JOHN L & DEBORAH L 419 MINNESOTA ST N LA VISTA NE 68128 70806712 HEARTWOOD RD NEWTON lA 50208 8813HURTT,JUNE ETAL 1798 W 28TH ST N JACOB,THOMAS M EXCELSIOR MN 55331 1908141 MINNETONKA BLVD JACOBS,JERRY L & MAGGIE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 2511343 PIERCE STNE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418 2478JACOBS,SIMON ATST 2701 ARMOUR TER W OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9423JACOBSON,TONY L & MARY J 43657 355TH ST JELTEMA,WESLEY G & THERESA OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942735671 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425JOHNSON,ARTHURJ 35320 438TH AVE WAHPETON ND 58075 9628KNUDSEN,CATHY 7750 MARIE ST DODGE CITY KS 67801 0566KONRADE,MARVIN PO BOX 566 KONRADE,MARVIN R & CHARLOTTE DODGE CITY KS 678010566PO BOX 566 LACHOWITZER,DELORIS D OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942835816 RUSH LAKE LOOP LOKEN,DANA M &JANA M OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942343653 355TH ST LONG,VIOLAJ CLINTON lA 52732 5603723 8TH ST S LUND,MAURICE & LOUISE A DODGE CITY KS 67801 64201907 LAM ESA DR M & M DEVELOPMENT LLC BATTLE LAKE MN 56515 928838425 COUNTRY ESTATE RD OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9447MANTEUFFEL PROPERTIES LLC 35338 RUSH LAKE LOOP MCGOWAN,MELVIN & CAROL 35445 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425 MEYER,DANIELH& DIANE R WEST FARGO ND 58078 0252PO BOX 252 ENDERLIN ND 58027 1127MUTH,LARRY R ETAL 116 HARRISON ST NELSON,JOHN I & KAREN L OTTERTAIL MN 56571 946235315 438TH AVE NELSON,STEVE & ANDRIA 6312 BROADWAY ST NW MOORHEAD MN 56560 6369 Wednesday, September 18, 2013 Page 2 of 3 city, State, ZipAddress 2Address 1Sort Name OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942535434 438TH AVENELSON,WILLIAM D YOUNG AMERICA MN 55397 4508NICHOLSON,DONALD S & LISA M 386 MEADOW LN HUTCHINSON MN 55350 5711NILES,TODD 0 21948 MAJOR AVE FERGUS FALLS MN 56537 1364510 FIR AVE WOTTER TAIL COUNTY OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9427PFLAGER,GAYLE 35617 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942735579 RUSH LAKE LOOPPUTNAM,SHARON 7 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419 2214R & L TST 6110 COLFAX LN S FARGO ND 58106 7160RDOFFUTT CO PO BOX 7160 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9429SANDBERG,LARRY &. PATRICIA 44026 BREEZY LN SAUNDERS,DENNIS D & PATRICIA BLAIR NE 68008 1221804 16TH ST N SAINT JOSEPH MO 64505 2141211118TH ST NSHERWOOD,ROBERTA BLAIR NE 68008 1212SMITH,HENRY & RUTHENE TST 618 15TH ST N SAINT PAUL MN 55155 4045PO BOX 45STATE OF MINNESOTA SAINT PAUL MN 55155 4045500 LAFAYETTE RD PO BOX 45STATE OF MINNESOTA OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9426STEWART,BARRY A & LYNDA M 43848 355TH ST SHELLY MN 565814107201 2ND STSWALSTAD,TODD OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9445WHITNEY,DANIEL C & JENNIFER 35922 STATE HIGHWAY 78 OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9425WIDMER,GERALD O & MARJORIE J 35364 438TH AVE OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9428WITKOWSKI,WAYNE &. DIANNE 35852 RUSH LAKE LOOP OTTERTAIL MN 56571 942735711 RUSH LAKE LOOPZIEMANN,KIM H WOODBURY MN 55125 2839ZIEMANN,RYAN L & ALEXANDRA E 3576SUNBURY DR Page 3 of 3Wednesday, September 18, 2013 & file memo & ^3 DDti CooPARCEL # R(j»VI^NAME & NO.LAKE O ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Date _________ L&R Official jife -l/lEWSfl .^(rg __l2ijAll^Action/Comments. ^ aUT ^ A p4iJ>Ai£/r\ _________ > VE<SEn^ris/^ /^hJ 4- lJj ________* HuJ^ ^£\______ __________* dwiE/L ____________ Date L&R Official Action/Comments. Date L&R Official Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action / Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate Action/Comments. L&R OfficialDate. Action/Comments.