The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About53000990287000_Variances_10-05-1995Variances 2 Barcode 128 Coli^l^y Recorcier / c^ County of Otter Tail y I hereby certify that the'.vithin instrument was filed Aom i/^A-rir\M c/-»d \/adiaki<^c for record in this office on the__jT_d3y of APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE —P^Ca.d. tg^at u FROM and was duly Microfilmed as Doc.^ TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA ...VaiM>vAYwVerf ^ 30 -^3^ County Recorder^ 10**5 *IS95784756 Receipt No. Application Fee $ ■■5W-Phone:MiddleFirstLast Name iAo46 ~5L /i>. ^^HdOTH C/fy MAiZinA) ^444 ~7 Sfafe Zip No.Street & No. 6L-Z4-ry Lake Name _ Lake Class_________Lake No. 3i■7 I 3s A I /~aTwp. NameSec.Twp. Range ILegal Description;Fire No. or Lake ID # -5 3 ■' ZS l-ocDc> L/JT- B Parcel Number \hdU!^TiOA) //7^ T/V<^ J^£r3iKJi.'iz,e!HEA}'r VARIANCE REQUESTED IS: t o f^E.^ 7 F/^ 6 i^PTjt TA/OK -To a FFFr.ofF. 'TFi^ TA}F)F~ 16 L^CA7CO OAyVE^&i^^dA}t?y Forz, /? ^FF1>, A \//}F-iAf^ES nzOM jVlR. Aoi4/0^oa} iX|\^EXD yiAe LOT t/a)b 8btu)ffa) /5 //J A&f^EFjHFtJT 8a} TAF fOLO£t2E> To TooFTF TNF ^A/F'O FR.OM In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreland Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Application dated io/S la/T I e i I f i19_3^2. Time:Date of hearing:'+95 7 /^vn .MOTION AS FOLLOWS:SEP 1 4 1995 ly/i anlmously carried, toMotion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and table this variance request until the December 1995 meeting for a regarding the amount of the applicant's lot that is covered with impervious surfaces. itjAKa&iReseuiStfn! I , Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as the existing structures and other impervious surfaces already exceed more than 25X of the total lot area, been requested before the actual placement of the 8' by 12' s^ would have denied the requested variances because the existirw imperious surfaces exceed more than 25X of the total lot>^ri#^ It was noted that had the variances d the Board struct^^s Chairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permitfs) from Land & Resource Man^ement required:NOYES 7/mailed copy of Application to Applicant.(Date/Initial) MKL — 0483-001 258.371 ^ Victor Lundeen Co.. Printers. Fergus Falls. Minnesota < V-f :l:T )<::]■ -tc. '1 } 4i 'i - /nil •/• n y I.'- (f / "a, ! '=^^ :rFA\A uLa.>>-cL AoJ<Jc /'^!y0 '.Ay. y ^ri /llc 7 - 00^ ■' 3^ ' OO S • Js -00i> 37-cor i ■ -\ ^9/ (5^ ^3 oLci^i -60/ • “ 9 o o "s‘ \ 30 3 f - ' c • . ;s V \ 1 .A - '3•, 1^ N ' 7 i ! Department of LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL Phone: (218) 739-2271 Court House FERGUS FALLS. MINNESOTA 56537 December 15, 1995 Larry E. Fuller 14045 36th Ave. N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Violation #1176 and Variance Denial, Marion Lake (56-243)RE: Dear Mr. Fuller: According to the minutes that our office received regarding the December 7, 1995 hearing of the Board of Adjustment, your variance request was denied. It appears that the Board of Adjustment felt that the 25% Impervious Surface rule had been violated along with the setback rules. This ruling leaves you with one option to bring your situation into compliance and that is to remove the offending utility structure, to avoid further legal action, this structure must be removed by June 1, 1996. In order If you have any cpiestions regarding this matter, please contact our office. Sincerely Wayne Roisum Inspector mgb i Page 2 - December 7th, 1995 Larry E. Fuller - Denied Larry E. Fuller, Plymouth, MN, requested a variance of 6’ from the required septic tank setback of 10' and a variance of 4' 9* from the required side lot line setback of 10' for the location of an existing 8' by 12' shed 4' from the septic tank and 5' 3" from the side lot line. The property is described as Lot 8, Merryland Park, Marion Lake in Rush Lake Tovnship. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to table this variance request.until the December 1995 meeting for additional information regarding the amount of the applicant's lot that is covered with impervious surfaces. December 7th, 1995, Meeting - The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as the existing structures and other impervious surfaces already exceed more than 25X of the total lot area. It was noted that had the variances been requested before the actual placement of the 8' by 12' shed the Board of Adjustment would have denied the requested variances because the existing structures and other impervious surfaces exceed more than 25% of the total lot area. Gary Nelson - Denied Gary Nelson, Fargo, ND, requested a variance of 5' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 20' and a variance of 63' from the required side lot line setback of 65' for the location of an existing 12' by 12' deck (water - oriented accessory structure) 15' from the ordinary high water level and 2' from the side lot line. The property is described as Lot 2, Block 1, Sybling Hills, Lake Sybil in Dora Township. The audience was polled with John Bigler and Dorothy Bylander speaking against the applicant's request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship had been shown and the granting of this request would establish a precedence. The Board of Adjustment granted the applicant until June 1st, 1996, to either remove the water - II II oriented accessory structure or to place the water - oriented accessory structure in a location that complies with the requirements of the ordinance, variances been requested prior to the placement of the water - oriented accessory structure in its present location the Board of Adjustment would have denied the requested variances for the same reasons as stated above. It was noted that had the ■■s I It was the opinion of the Board that the placement of the structure in this location would create a financial hardship for the adjacent property owner. EDGE DE EDAD 5'~3" LOT LINE 4'-0" mLK ^AY AND NEIGHBORS SHED ___12' - 0" r PRESENT O 7/0^72,6 O 20'- 0" r- 0 "GARAGEPRESENT 1r r - ni(17'SEP' 1 4 1995 jLI LAND & RESOURC •:/S'"0.I Jr"7^ OLD I 1 Loam/^ - j SePriC TANK U' 'A i'2.NBIA LDCA TIDN OF 8 X 12 SHED i 10'- 0" 1 LP O 12'- 0" 4'- 0" 10'- 0" es‘-<r 1 EDGE tF mo■S'-3’ LOT LINE 4'-<y WUr NAY ANDneiamissm I2>- O’ PSESENT 0 ‘PNESB/T ~*1 O ()ar- O' EAKAEE ~ nrjhoh'ssa I I TSB^IC TANKLB/incATimir BX 12 t/a 10'- O'—I I )Ou> t2>- O’4'- O’ 10'- O’ 20'-6’ CIRCLES sum ABE TREES O BtTRANCE O O MUSE O LHT8 miRYLAND PAIX FIRE NO 165omi ■1 ; Q i S E 1 w SEP 1 4 1995 LANDS F'^'~O CB0IT PATIO OOO LAKE SIDE S3'-0’