Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout53000340267014_Variances_01-08-1992Variances Barcode 128 l=8*/9az- 818G48 01tiee f^ouHty leRBrdei County of Otter Tail ; certify that the within instrument w and was duly MicrcfitmeCeTo^#.,^^ was filed ,648 Courtly Record —-S£d/^L__-------_Oeouty THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739 - 2271 COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK # # « Application Fee Receipt Number / c? 7(A S' S' DAYTIME PHONE ^^S-LPROPERTY OWNER /. Qrre^<\iK,. fAti 5^<r~7(-97^ADDRESS _ LAKE NAME SECTION 34- TOWNSHIP / jtsT RANGE FIRE NUMBER OR LAKE I.D. NUMBER ^13. kJ^LAKE NUMBER -2/^ LAKE CLASS TOWNSHIP NAME /TLi5F/ Ia<^39 LEGAL DESCRIPTION pr-. 6,. L. (p, 34,TT i?C,K-3f? ATo ^3-000-3^-OS b~7-0\^ 53 OOP-A026V -O 1 4 TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Misc.Structure Setback Structure Size___Sewage System____ Subdivision Cluster SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED Lor UrJe S^r<jO£€d -noo Paricels T-C? CR£/8Tc. SCANNED I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. OF PROPERTY b^NER7SIGNATURE DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) * 'r'- '' Accepted By Land & Resource ^3'/ L & R Official/Date TimeDate Of Hearing Motion Motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by George Walter and unanimously carried, to approve a variance that will redefine the lot line between two existing parcels and that will create two parcels of more equal size as depicted on the registered sun/eyor’s drawing and to approve a 9’ variance, for both Tract C and Tract D, from the required back lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of a septic tank and/or drain field 1 ’ from the back lot line/roadway. It should be noted that the granting of this variance will allow the reshaping of two substandard lots into two lots more equal in size, will provide each lot with water frontage that is closer to the requirements of the ordinance, will provide greater separation between an existing dwelling and the lot line, will make each lot better suited for the placement of a septic system and the granting of the variance is not in conflict with the intentions of the shoreland management ordinance. ^ r \— . / ________________Chairman/Otter Tail Count^ Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR L R Official/Date ju» 11' iX i bk 0797-001 287.363 * Victor Lurtdeen Co.. Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota January 8,1998 Page 6 John LeRoy and Thomas Hiedeman - Approved John LeRoy, Fergus Falls, MN, and Thomas Hiedeman, Underwood, MN, requested a variance “to put septic system and drain field on or across lot line. Between LeRoy and Hiedeman to accommodate new bldg, on Hiedeman and eventual new home on LeRoy. Also to put close (2’ to 4’) to back of lot as space is limited. LeRoy’s well will be moved.” The required setback from a lot line for the placement of a holding tank and/or a drain field is 10’. The property is described as Lots 1 and 2, Jensen’s Survey Lots of Government Lot 5, Section 1 of Sverdrup Township by East Lost Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, seconded by Robert Schwartz and unanimously carried, to approve a variance to place a septic system and drain field on and/or across a common lot line and within 2 to 4’ of the back lot line noting a written property owner’s agreement has been prepared and the proposed location has been recommended by a licensed installer. Hardship is substandard lots of record. Susan Jensen - Approved Susan Jensen, Ottertail, MN, requested a variance to redefine the lot line between two existing parcels and to create two parcels of more equal size. The property concerned in this variance application is identified as Tract C and Tract D on the applicant’s registered surveyor’s drawing. Fred Fudpucker owns a portion of this property with the balance of the property owned by Susan Jensen. The property is described as part of Government Lot 6, Section 34 of Rush Lake Township by Mud Lake. Clem Hendrickson, Surveyor, appeared along with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by George Walter and unanimously carried, to approve a variance that will redefine the lot line between two existing parcels and that will create two parcels of more equal size as depicted on the registered surveyor’s drawing and to approve a 9’ variance, for both Tract C and Tract D, from the required back lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of a septic tank and/or drain field T from the back lot line/roadway? It should be noted that the granting of this variance will allow the reshaping of two substandard lots into two lots more equal in size, will provide each lot with water frontage that is closer to the requirements of the ordinance, will provide greater separation between an existing dwelling and the lot line, will make each lot better suited for the placement of a septic system and the granting of the variance is not in conflict with the intentions of the shoreland management ordinance. Harold and Joan Iten - Approved Harold and Joan Iten, Browerville, MN, requested a variance of 6’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the construction of a 24’ by 24’ garage 4’ from the lot line. The property is described as Lot 10, Jerry’s Breezy Beach, Rush Lake in Rush Lake Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by George Walter, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 6’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the construction of a 24’ by 24’ garage 4’ from the lot line. It should be noted t|iat the proposed garage would be no closer to the side lot line than the existing 12’ by 20’ carport.