Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout53000180103000_Variances_11-14-2001OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA 1 hereby certify that this instrument #___ was filed/recorded in this office ,o,rsoo,^onms^dg,o;^^^ recording fee ^ 895040 by: weli certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739 -2271 COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK MMi— Application Fee Receipt Number Accepted By / Date DAYTIME PHONE 9A&AvuSPROPERTY OWNER I LUjj //<r^■dV.ADDRESS LAKE CLASSLAKE NUMBER LA^JJAME _ / TOWNSHIP ^biirf^RANGE .7^ TOWNSHIP NAMESECTION ^3ooo! PO/o3c>ooPARCEL NUMBER E-911 Address LEGAL DESCRIPTION lO'lx ^(^1/T~ /yff/J - fi S‘foj |i|^ /O to>3 I AJ TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback Structure Size Misc.ClusterSewage System Subdivision SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED fcru/7^ yi^ ^ i^tUG aS^ OjS- «sA y\ju3laJi ^ ■ O i I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. f)l0\) l^lc ^ / DATESIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) UO-ctJ'^ iyiO 600' AjUU /QDecember 5, 2001 Page 19 fy-UfnjLhj JrXOt.O' CiXJL -f-O iu~ AjL^ 10-^ '7.0^ /‘■rn./a?- /d ' O /Date Of Hearing Time Motion David Adams - Approved as requested. Motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 17’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 40’ for the placement of a 40’ by 120’ building 23’ from the road right-of- way noting that the applicant had contacted Rush Lake Township and that the township was not opposed to the present location of the structure. It was noted that the present location of the structure does not obstruct the view of the road or the view from the road. It was also noted that the present location of the building would not interfere with road maintenance or with snow removal. 7 Chairro^n/Otter Tail County Board of Adjustpfient Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No L R Official/Date ’Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR bk 0501-001 305,391 • Vidor Lundeen Cc.. Printers, Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800-346-4870 L lAScale:.grid(s) equals_____feet, or inch(es) equals feet 1 7 Please use this sheet for the required scale drawing of your proposal. Be sure to include lot dimension, water frontage, and setbacks from RW, lake, lot lines, sewage system, top of bluff, existing structures and alt imper­ vious surface. Required impervious surface coverage calcuiation (See definition in Shoreland Management Ordinance) X 100 = Total Impervious Surface Onsite (FT2) Total Lot Area I : ! r ijf ! / IA ^/D ia3V?:!' O w V ^7' V X Signature Dated 304.678 • Victor Undeen Co.. Printers • Fergus Fells. MN • 1-800-34&4870 f Nov, 12, qi To those it would Concern; Last Summer David Adams approached Rush Lake Township about the prospect of building a storage building aridTF there were any~buT13ing requirements Ly the Township. I informed him that the Township had no building permits or controlling ordinance. At that time he asked about howTarTie would have toLe awaylfom the Town^lp road. T explained that the road easement is a 66 ft. right of way and that means the easement edge is 33 ft. fi-om centerline. I also stated that the only setback that we were aware of is the 20 ft. that is often referred to in lakeside residential lots. We discussed the Tact that on easement roads thelandowner owns the property to the middle of the road unlike State or County roadways and that the primary cc^ncern is that the structure notlmpede snow removal or view oTfhe roadway. If there are^y questions or further concerns please call. Anm^w Klinnert, ChairmaiTRusRXalce~Town^lp »t ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I UNDERSTAND THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF OF THE OFFICE OF LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEMBERS, MAY NOT BE ABLE TO VIEW THE PROPERTY FOR WHICH A CONDITIONAL USE/VARIANCE HAS BEEN REQUESTED DUE TO SNOW COVER. AS A RESULT, IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE FOR OTTER TAIL COUNTY TO MEET THE LEGAL REQUIREMENT TO TAKE ACTION WITHIN 60. DAYS OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION. I UNDERSTAND THAT IN THE ABSENCE OF A WAIVER OF THE 60 DAY REQURIEMENT, THE COUNTY MAY HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO DENY THE APPLICATION. THEREFORE, I HEREBY AGREE TO WAIVE THE 60' DAY TIME LIMIT IN ORDER TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO VIEW THE PROPERTY BEFORE TAKING ACTION ON MY APPLICATION. I00\l M IsLOol APPLICANTDATED WhIS acknowledgement is to be signed between OCT FORMLTRS/6 0 DAYACK Notice of Hearing for Variance Otter Tail County Courthouse 121 West Junius Ave. Fergus Falls, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 Ext. 240 Email - wstein@co.ottertail.mn.us www.co.otter-tail:mn.us Applicant must be present at the scheduled hearing. To Whom It May Concern: David Adams 40041 County Highway 14 Richville, MN 56576 has made application to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment for a variance as per requirerrients of the OttqrTail County Shoreland Management Ordinance and/or the Subdivision Controls Ordinance. The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment will assemble for this hearing on Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 6:30 p.m.. in the Commissioners’ Room of the Otter Tail County Courthouse, Fergus Falls, MN. (Please use the west Law Enforcement entrance.) Individuals.requiring special accommodations should contact the County Auditor’s office prior to the date of the public hearing. The property concerned in the application is legally described as the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, E911 Address ^40041 County Highway 14 Section 18, Township 135, Range 39 - Township Name - Rush Lake Lake No. 56-NA, Lake Name - NA, Class - NA The variance requested is: a variance of 17’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 40’ for.the placement of a 40’ by 1201 building 23’ from the road right-of-way. Board (^A^ustm^ent SecretaryDate: November 16, 2001 ,; OTTER TAIL COUNTY Fergus Falls, Minnesota State of Minnesota ) )SS County of Otter Tail) I, Wayne Stein, Secretary for the Board of Adjustment for Otter Tail County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that on the 19th, day of November, 2001 the attached Notice of Hearing for Variance was duly served upon the individuals listed belowand/or included in the attachment. David Adams, 40041 County Highway 14, Richville, MN 56576 Rose Stoll, 38141 430*'' Ave, Perham, MN 56573 Otter Tail County Cola, % John Matteson, Rt 2 Box 40W, Battle Lake, MN 56515 Richard West, Otter Tail County Highway Engineer, Courthouse, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Terry Lejcher, DNR 1221 1/2 E. Fir Ave., Fergus Falls, MN 56537 DNR Regional Administrator, 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE, Bemidji, MN 56601 Town Clerk Board of Adjustment: David H. Holmgren, RR 1 Box 188B, Henning, MN 56551 Richard S. Schierer, 3310 Rollins Beach Tris, Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Cecil B. Femling, 13 6th St. NE, Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 Randall Mann, 532 N. Ann St., Fergus Falls, MN 56537 David Trites, 707 N. Otter Ave, Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 Mark Steuart, RR 1 Box 82, Richville, MN 56576 by placing a true and correct copy thereof in a sealed envelope; postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Mail at Fergus Falls, MN, property addressed to each of the individuals listed above and/or listed in the attachment. Dated: November 19th, 2001 Wayne Stein, Secretary Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment By: Vi Manderud , 'Jf- . RICHARD LOERZEL 375S2 CuUUTY HIGHWAY 49 RICHVILLE, I'lH 3&976-9602 DAVID W 1 DOROTHY C ADAHS 40041 CGUMTY HIGHWAY 14 RICHVILLE, ilH 56576-9611 ■A -i : 5 Nov 01 Mr. David w. Adams 40041 County Highway 14 Richville, Mn 56576 RE: Storage building erected in Parcel #53000180103000 (in 4-Acre portion between Co #14 and 375“’Street Sir: As we discussed on Friday, 2 Nov 01 at the site of the subject building, the minimum structure setback from any Right of Way is 40’. The subject building is @23’ from the ROW of 375“" Street. As I promised you, l am enclosing the application forms for a Variance application, along with the schedule of remaining meetings. Please have your application submitted by 3 PM on 15 Nov 01. Your only other options are to remove the intruding portion of the building or let the situation end up in Court. Contact me if you need further assistance. Sincerely, Mark Ronning, Inspector FIELD INVESTtSATION REPORT I Number of Photographs Taken y ____ No ^Action Necessary (see comments) ^ Letter Needed (see comments) Letter Mailed ____ Violation Needed (see below) Violation #___Mailed Nature of Violation: A) Earthmoving B) Building C) Sewer D. Other (Describe) Sketch: 1^1I IIrI L.II I i I I j/ / I / Comments: Tocjy^o/i c> j TimeInvestigated By AAB:Forms:COMPLAINT 8~00 Date December 13, 2001 • -''^!ge#2 Patricia and Gregory Marzolf-(Continued) After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Linda Bergerud and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 2’ 3” from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of an existing 24’ by 30’ structure 7’ 9” from the common lot line between Lots 18 and 19. The hardship is Permit No. 478, issued June 19, 1972, which permitted the placement of the existing 24’ by 30’ structure 6’ from the common lot line of Lots 18 and 19. John C. and Peggy Carlson - Denied road right-of-way variance. Approved a variance from the marina. Approved a variance for the placement of a fence. John C. and Peggy Carlson, Wahpeton, ND, requested a variance of 3’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ and a variance of 28’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the construction of a 30’ by 30’ garage 17’ from the road right-of-way and 47’ from the marina (ordinary high water level). Also, requesting a variance of 29’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the placement of a 48’ long by 6’ high fence 46’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lot 1, Block 1, Blarney Beach, Otter Tail Lake in Everts Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance from the road right-of-way as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown, to approve an ordinary high water level variance from the marina which would allow for the placement of the proposed structure 20’ from the road right-of-way, but within the required ordinary high water level setback area and to approve the placement of a fence no closer to the ordinary high water level than the shed on the neighbor’s property as depicted on the applicants’ drawing. The granting of the variance as approved will provide the applicants with a reasonable use of there property. Hardship is a substandard lot of record and the terrain features of the applicants’ property. Thomas C. and Irene W. Allmaras - Approved as modified with a condition. Thomas C. and Irene W. Allmaras, Battle Lake, MN, requested a variance to subdivide, by metes and bounds description, a parcel approximately 60’ by 250’ from an existing parcel of less than 5 acres for the purpose of conveyance to an adjacent property owner. The property is described as part of Government Lot 3, Section 2 of Everts Township by Otter Tail Lake. Robert Yaggie represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Linda Bergerud and unanimously carried, to approve the conveyance of the following described parcel with the condition that it must be permanently attached to the Robert and Darlene Yaggie property: The North 220 feet of the South 435 feet of the West 59.5 feet of the East 1,034 feet of Government Lot 3, Section 2, Township 133 North, Range 40 West of the 5‘^ Principal Meridian, Otter Tail County, Minnesota. It was also stated that the property being retained by Thomas C. and Irene W. Allmaras would continue to be classified as a substandard lot of record for future development purposes. The proposed subdivision will not cause the classification of the portion being retained by the Allmaras to change. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants’ property. It was also noted that the variance as approved will provide Thomas C and Irene W. Allmaras with access to a dedicated public road. David Adams - Approved as requested. David Adams, Richville, MN, requested a variance of 17’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 40’ for the placement of a 40’ by 120’ building 23’ from the road right-of-way. The property is described as the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 18 of Rush Lake Township. A letter from Andrew Klinnert, Chairman Rush Lake Township was noted for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. December 13, 2001 ■ ;'^ge#3 David Adams - Approved as requested (Continued). After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 17’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 40’ for the placement of a 40’ by 120’ building 23’ from the road right-of-way noting that the applicant had contacted Rush Lake Township and that the township was not opposed to the present location of the structure. It was noted that the present location of the structure does not obstruct the view of the road or the view from the road. It was also noted that the present location of the building would not interfere with road maintenance or with snow removal. Allen and Margaret Mashek - Approved as modified with conditions. Allen and Margaret Mashek, Elbow Lake, MN, requested a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of- way setback of 20’ for the replacement of a dwelling 0’ from the road right-of-way, a variance to move an existing garage 6’ east, and a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for an addition to the existing garage 0’ from the road right-of-way. It should be noted that the proposed new dwelling would extend over the existing east lot line. The adjoining west Vz of Lot 3 has been surveyed and will be permanently attached to Lot 4. This will allow the new dwelling to meet the 10’ side lot line setback. The existing cabin on the west 14 of Lot 3 will be removed. The property is described as the West Half of Lot 3 and all of Lot 4, Block 1, Marheine’s Camp Corliss First Addition, Clitherall Lake in Clitherall Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling to approve the variance as requested noting that it was a substantial improvement over the prior request and noting that their was no new development within the road right-of-way. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants’ property and a substandard lot of record. Before this motion was acted upon the applicant presented a letter from Arlyn Hustad, Clitherall Township Clerk, noting that the Town Board does not oppose the proposed development as long as all buildings are outside of the township road right-of-way. As a result of this letter the above referenced motion was withdrawn. After additional discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 20’ from the required road-right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a dwelling and a garage 0’ from the road- right-of-way with the following conditions; 1. that before a permit for the new construction can be issued the existing dwelling on Lot 4 and the existing dwelling on the west 1/3 of Lot 3 must be removed and 2. all buildings must be out of the road right-of-way after completion of the proposed development. Hardship is a substandard lot of record and the terrain features of the applicants’ property. It was noted that the variance as approved does provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property, removes all buildings from the road right-of-way and is generally an overall improvement to the area. Alan W. Pettit Trust-Tabled Alan W. Pettit Trust, Wadena, MN, requested the following; ‘We will have to re-roof the roof in the future. So we want to raise the back or south side of roof in a dormer fashion so that we will have more headroom on that side or south side of roof. The north side of roof is higher than the back or south side. The building will not be made wider, longer etc. Just part of same maybe 3 to 5 ft higher to match front. Carpenter calls it changing roof style.” It appears that the variance necessary is a variance to raise a roof on a second dwelling (sleeping room). The property is described as part of Jackson and McKees Addition and part of Government Lot 1, Section 23 of Pine Lake Township by Big Pine Lake. An email from Sylvester and Louise Knapp in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to table per the applicant’s written request the public hearing concerning this application until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment. - December 13, 2001 ^\R^e#2 Patricia and Gregory Marzolf- (Continued) After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Linda Bergerud and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 2’ 3" from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of an existing 24’ by 30’ structure 7’ 9” from the common lot line between Lots 18 and 19. The hardship is Permit No. 478, issued June 19, 1972, which permitted the placement of the existing 24’ by 30’ structure 6’ from the common lot line of Lots 18 and 19. John C. and Peggy Carlson - Denied road right-of-way variance. Approved a variance from the marina. Approved a variance for the placement of a fence. John C. and Peggy Carlson, Wahpeton, ND, requested a variance of 3’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ and a variance of 28’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the construction of a 30’ by 30’ garage 17’ from the road right-of-way and 47’ from the marina (ordinary high water level). Also, requesting a variance of 29’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75’ for the placement of a 48’ long by 6’ high fence 46’ from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lot 1, Block 1, Blarney Beach, Otter Tail Lake in Everts Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance from the road right-of-way as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown, to approve an ordinary high water level variance from the marina which would allow for the placement of the proposed structure 20’ from the road right-of-way, but within the required ordinary high water level setback area and to approve the placement of a fence no closer to the ordinary high water level than the shed on the neighbor’s property as depicted on the applicants’ drawing. The granting of the variance as approved will provide the applicants with a reasonable use of there property. Hardship is a substandard lot of record and the terrain features of the applicants’ property. Thomas C. and Irene W. Allmaras - Approved as modified with a condition. Thomas C. and Irene W. Allmaras, Battle Lake, MN, requested a variance to subdivide, by metes and bounds description, a parcel approximately 60’ by 250’ from an existing parcel of less than 5 acres for the purpose of conveyance to an adjacent property owner. The property is described as part of Government Lot 3, Section 2 of Everts Township by Otter Tail Lake. Robert Yaggie represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Linda Bergerud and unanimously carried, to approve the conveyance of the following described parcel with the condition that it must be permanently attached to the Robert and Darlene Yaggie property: The North 220 feet of the South 435 feet of the West 59.5 feet of the East 1,034 feet of Government Lot 3, Section 2, Township 133 North, Range 40 West of the 5**’ Principal Meridian, Otter Tail County, Minnesota. It was also stated that the property being retained by Thomas C. and Irene W. Allmaras would continue to be classified as a substandard lot of record for future development purposes. The proposed subdivision will not cause the classification of the portion being retained by the Allmaras to change. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants’ property. It was also noted that the variance as approved will provide Thomas C and Irene W. Allmaras with access to a dedicated public road. David Adams - Approved as requested. David Adams, Richville, MN, requested a variance of 17’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 40’ for the placement of a 40’ by 120’ building 23’ from the road right-of-way. The property is described as the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 18 of Rush Lake Township. A letter from Andrew Klinnert, Chairman Rush Lake Township was noted for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. ^mber 13,2001 ie # 3 w After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 17’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 40’ for the placement of a 40’ by 120’ building 23’ from the road right-of-way noting that the applicant had contacted Rush Lake Township and that the township was not opposed to the present location of the structure. It was noted that the present location of the structure does not obstruct the view of the road or the view from the road. It was also noted that the present location of the building would not interfere with road maintenance or with snow removal. David Adams - Approved as requested (Continued). Allen and Margaret Mashek - Approved as modified with conditions. Allen and Margaret Mashek, Elbow Lake, MN, requested a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of- way setback of 20’ for the replacement of a dwelling 0’ from the road right-of-way, a variance to move an existing garage 6’ east, and a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for an addition to the existing garage 0’ from the road right-of-way. It should be noted that the proposed new dwelling would extend over the existing east lot line. The adjoining west 14 of Lot 3 has been surveyed and will be permanently attached to Lot 4. This will allow the new dwelling to meet the 10’ side lot line setback. The existing cabin on the west of Lot 3 will be removed. The property is described as the West Half of Lot 3 and all of Lot 4, Block 1, Marheine’s Camp Corliss First Addition, Clitherall Lake in Clitherall Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling to approve the variance as requested noting that it was a substantial improvement over the prior request and noting that their was no new development within the road right-of-way. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants’ property and a substandard lot of record. Before this motion was acted upon the applicant presented a letter from Arlyn Hustad, Clitherall Township Clerk, noting that the Town Board does not oppose the proposed development as long as all buildings are outside of the township road right-of-way. As a result of this letter the above referenced motion was withdrawn. After additional discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 20’ from the required road-right-of-way setback of 20' for the placement of a dwelling and a garage 0’ from the road- right-of-way with the following conditions: 1. that before a permit for the new construction can be issued the existing dwelling on Lot 4 and the existing dwelling on the west 1/3 of Lot 3 must be removed and 2. all buildings must be out of the road right-of-way after completion of the proposed development. Hardship is a substandard lot of record and the terrain features of the applicants’ property. It was noted that the variance as approved does provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property, removes all buildings from the road right-of-way and is generally an overall improvement to the area. Alan W. Pettit Trust - Tabled Alan W. Pettit Trust, Wadena, MN, requested the following: “We will have to re-roof the roof in the future. So we want to raise the back or south side of roof in a dormer fashion so that we will have more headroom on that side or south side of roof. The north side of roof is higher than the back or south side. The building will not be made wider, longer etc. Just part of same maybe 3 to 5 ft higher to match front. Carpenter calls it changing roof style.” It appears that the variance necessary is a variance to raise a roof on a second dwelling (sleeping room). The property is described as part of Jackson and McKees Addition and part of Government Lot 1, Section 23 of Pine Lake Township by Big Pine Lake. An email from Sylvester and Louise Knapp in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to table per the applicant’s written request the public hearing concerning this application until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment. 1 FIELD INVESTI6ATI0N REPORT« Number of Photographs Taken // ____ No Action Necessary (see comments) Letter Needed (see comments) Letter Mailed ____ Violation Needed (see below) Violation #___ T i Mailed Nature of Violation: 6) BuildingA) Earfhmoving C) Sewer D. Other (Describe) .Sketch: ■ ■iiI I ■ i I I !6**riII I iJ' 1 :V-j •: / // /i /{'1/i \■ [ Comment! S ^ 'Y/»->— Vo —Tc<J /2o/1 £> /i 5 TimeInvestigated By MB:Forms:COMPUINT 8~00 Date—1 ■ * ,i ■'r. * / 5 Nov.Ol Mr. David w. Adams 40041 County Highway 14 Richville, Mn 56576 : RE: Storage building erected in Parcel #53000180103000 (in 4-Acre portion between Co #14 and 375Street Sir: As we discussed on Friday, 2 Nov 01 at the site of the subject building, the minimum structure setback from any Right of Way is 40’. The subject building is @23’ from the ROW of 375*’’ Street. As I promised you, I am enclosing the application forms for a Variance application, along with the schedule of remaining meetings. Please have your application submitted by 3 PM on 15 Nov 01. Your only other options are to remove the intruding portion of the building ,or let the situation end up in Court. ..Contact me.if .you need further assistance. Sincerely, Mark Running, Inspector -I r /) Print Key Output Page 1 11/05/01 10:20:555769SS1 V4R5M0 000526 OTTER Display Device User ....QPADEV0089MRONNING TC906D 10 T56 ACS Tax System Bill No. Parcel No.R- 53000180103000 Inquiry Taxpayer/Legal Info DAVID W & DOROTHY C ADAMS RICHVILLE MN 56576 NameR 02002 Tax CodesTwn/Sch 0053 0549 Spec Dist User Codes TIE District Property Address 40041 CO HWY 14 RICHVILLE Legal DescriptionSect/Twri/Range 18 135 ' 039PlatLot/BlockWl/2 NWl/4 & NWl/4 SWl/4 District Code 5301 Taxpayer DAVID W & DOROTHY C ADAMS 40041 COUNTY HIGHWAY 14 RICHVILLE MN 11307 229 56576-9611 56576 Alternate EscrowDeeded120.00 AC Other DOROTHY C ADAMS66146 OWNER More Legal? N More Addresses?, Y Mod? Action?NO BILL # ASSIGNED I Department of LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTt-ER TAIL COUNTY Government Services Center • 540 West Fir ’ Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Ph: 218-998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us v' March 29,2005 David & Dorthy Adams 40041 Co. Hwy 14 Richville, MN 56576 RE: Sewage Treatment System Servicing Tax Parcel Number 53000180103000 Described as Wl/2 NWl/4 & NWl/4 SWl/4 (120:00 Acres), Section 18 of Rush Lake Township • • As of March 28, 2005, the sewage system treatment system (Sewage Treatment Installation Permit #17216) servicing your property was determined to be in compliance with the provisions of the Sanitation Code of Otter Tail County for a 3 bedroom home. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office. .v' Sincerely, . Mark Ronning Inspector i' ^5” AfiPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO INSTALL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, OTTER TAIL COUNTY (218-998-8095) 121 W. JUNIUS AVE. SUITE 130, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 www.co.otter-tail.mn.us WHITE - Office YELLOW -L&R Inspector PINK - Owner / Contractor (after issue) i 1 Xfu Y'A/- ,/V APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETE IN ORDER TO BE PROCESSED Permit No. RANGE TWP NAMELAKE/RIVER CLASS SECTION TWP NO.LAKE/RIVER NAMELAKE NUMBER N<rh.-!3S E-911 ADDRESS OR DIRECTIONS FROM NEAREST PUBLIC ROADPARCEL NUMBER (S) OF PROPERTY BEING SERVICED •400^/ CoS3emsmm88oLEGAL DESCRIPTION W a/ *7^ / y \AiL NvtsIVw ^0- HiAJLj I ¥ ^ ~~~Daytime Phone No.First Initial Mailing AddressLast Name Property Owner rfk."'•^vcWuii'\\g ^ iKtsi A.Contractor Lie.# 13^ THIS SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ., the year of>- This System will be ready for inspection on_ L & R Of(ici§llTime Received ^^ P.M. leceived SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DATA - AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGTYPE OF INSTALLATION (CIRCLE ONE) TANK DRAINFIELD Ft'GIs.3 73Size/3qoAdd-On/New System (20) Trench, Rock (21) Trench, Gravelless (22) Trench, Chamber (23) Bed Mound (25) At Grade Replacement (32) Tank, Septic (33) Tank, Lift (34) Trench, Rock (35) Trench, Gravelless (36) Trench, Chamber (37) Bed (38) Mound (39) At Grade (40) Combination Ft.Ft.Setback to nearest well nono Setback to OHWL (lake &/or river)Ft. Ft. Ft.Setback to wetland Ft. Ft.Setback to dwelling 13 Ft.Collector System (26) Trench, Rock (27) Trench, Gravelless (28) Trench, Chamber (29) Bed (30) Mound (31) At Grade 2-^Ft. Ft.Setback to non-dwelling Ft.Setback to nearest property line Ft./f^OOther (41) Tank, Holding (42) Outhouse (43) Sewer Line (44) Performance (45) Miscellaneous l6o /¥o Ft.Setback to road right-of-way Ft. sFt.Ft.Elevation above restrictive layer ALL DISTANCES ARE SHORTEST DISTANCE BETWEEN NEAREST POINTS. # BEDROOMS GARBAGE DISP. Y /(0> ABATEMENT Y /(R> DEPTH OF WATER WELL ABSORPTION AREA FOR MOUNDS ^30 37Z Ft^HOLDING TANK MONITOR/ DISPOSAL CONTRACT ( )Yes ( ) No-L&R Can Not Process EFFLUENT DISTRIBUTION ( ) Gravity (X) Pressure Designer yc:? Designer Lie. # 7-^ 4’ PERCOLATION TEST DATA '9^3<D~ (q‘4 LODate of Test,Highest Rate Agreement: The undersigned hereby makes application for permit to install, alter, repair or extend Sewage Treatment System herein specified, agreeing to do all such work in strict accordance with Sanitation Code of Otter Tail County, Minnesota. Applicant agrees that the Site Data Worksheet submitted herewith and which is approved by a Land & Resource Management Official shall become a part of the permit. Appiicant further agrees that no part of the system shall be covered until it has been inspected and approved for use. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant for the permit to notify Land & Resource Management that the installation is ready for inspection. Permit: Permission is hereby granted to the above named applicant to perform the work described in the above statement. This permit is granted upon express con­ dition that the person to whom it is granted, and his agent, employees and workmen shall conform in all respects to the Sanitation Code of Otter Tail County, Minnesota. This permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of the Sanitation Code. NOTE: This permi* is vaiid for a period of six (6) months. o/do./O' 1-0-/ //)(IV Signature of Property Owner/Agent k Permit Fee $Date: 'Owner' /37S^7,^7Rec. No.Date: Land & Resource Management Office Comments: Form No. BK — 0203-003 313.017 • Vidor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls, Minnesota SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM PERMIT INSPECTION RESULTS Inspector must make all measurements HOLDING SEPTIC TANK OUTHOUSEDRAINFIELDLIFT TANKCATEGORY ^oo gls.Capacity FT2GLS.I do Cj (pO ^FT FTSetback from Nearest Well Setback from Buried Water Suction Pipe FTFTFTFT Setback from Buried Pipe Distributing Water Under Pressure FTFT FTFT WS FT /1/S FTSetback from OHWL (lake &/or river)FT FT ■rsc, FT FT-4-5'c) FTSetback from Setback from Wetland FT f 100 ^FTSetback from Dwelling FTFT-IS ft FTFTSetback from Non-Dwelling hJQ 0 FT FTSetback from Nearest Property Line FT'i- / er o ft 4/0 0 ft -/-so FT FTFTSetback from Right-of-Way "■5 FT FTFTElevation above Restrictive Layer FT J> Holding Tank/Lift Alarm Old System Pumped & Destroyed FILTERSEPTIC TANK DRAINFIELD CALCULATIONSewer Line to Well Separation MinimumActualU.r_____ Kr.ic^> /O FTX□ YES ^NO Manuf.. 4 0,0 ft .ft^Model #20 MOUND CALCULATION MOUND /AT-GRADE ROCK REDUCTION Inspector’s Comments: ABSORBTION AREA Rock trenches with inches /7 Ft of rock under pipe for .%Ft. X DF.reduction / equivalent to,Ft2 SKETCH: c ( /cjy ( ( i> n' i i5^ //?Y ///w/ow 0 / yLzioInitial / L & R OfficialTimeDate the above described sewage system installation was found to be compliant with the provisions of the SanitationAs of Code of Otter Tail County. Land & Resource Managarngnt Official APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO INSTALL SEWAGE TREATMENT ^YSTEM^ LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, OTTER TAIL COUNTY (218-998-8095) QCT 1 5 2004 121 W. JUNIUS AVE. SUITE 130, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 www.co.otter-tail.mn.us %HITE - Office YELLOW -L&R Inspector PINK - Owner/ Contractor (after issue)LAND & RESOURCE ilXfLAPPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETE IN ORDER TO BE PROCESSED Permit No. TWPNO.RANGE TWP NAMELAKE/RIVER CLASS SECTIONLAKE NUMBER LAKE/RIVER NAME /3S- 3? PARCEL NUMBER (S) OF PROPERTY BEING SERVICED E-911 ADDRESS OR DIRECTIONS FROM NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD *4oo^/ CoS30OOlff O10 3OD0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ujh <4- A/W? 'S’ Initial Mailing Address Daytime Phone No.FirstLast Name 0^ __________________________ Property Owner 6yCJ Contractor Lie.# 7^1 .s~2-yr THIS SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY A.M. the year of P.M.>• This System will be ready for inspection on..at. A.M. P.M. L&R OfficialDate Received Time Received SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DATA - AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGTYPE OF INSTALLATION (CIRCLE ONE) TANK DRAINFIELD 3 7/^ Ft^/vS~oo GIs.SizeAdd-On/ Replacement (32) Tank, Septic (33) Tank, Lift (34) Trench, Rock (35) Trench, Gravelless (36) Trench, Chamber (37) Bed (38) Mound (39) At Grade (40) Combination New System (20) Trench, Rock (21) Trench, Gravelless (22) Trench, Chamber Setback to nearest well Ft. Ft.IfOno Setback to OHWL (lake &/or river)Ft.Ft.Bed Mound (25) At Grade Setback to wetland Ft.Ft. Setback to dwelling Ft.Fo Ft.Collector System (26) Trench, Rock (27) Trench, Gravelless (28) Trench, Chamber (29) Bed (30) Mound (31) At Grade 2,^Setback to non-dwelling Ft.Ft. Ft.Setback to nearest property line Ft.f¥oOther (41) Tank, Holding (42) Outhouse (43) Sewer Line (44) Performance (45) Miscellaneous ! 6o /¥oFt.Setback to road right-of-way Ft. SFt. Ft.Elevation above restrictive layer ALL DISTANCES ARE SHORTEST DISTANCE BETWEEN NEAREST POINTS.#BEDROOMS GARBAGE DISP. Y /(S) ABATEMENT Y ABSORPTION AREA FOR MOUNDSDEPTH OF WATER WELL 5^7Z Ft 2HOLDING TANK MONITOR/ DISPOSAL CONTRACT ( )Yes ( ) No-L&R Can Not Process EFFLUENT DISTRIBUTION ( ) Gravity (X) Pressure Designer Designer Lie. # PERCOLATION TEST DATA Highest Rate / ODate of Test. Agreement: The undersigned hereby makes application for permit to install, alter, repair or extend Sewage Treatment System herein specified, agreeing to do all such work in strict accordance with Sanitation Code of Otter Tail County, Minnesota. Applicant agrees that the Site Data Worksheet submitted herewith and which is approved by a Land & Resource Management Official shall become a part of the permit. Applicant further agrees that no part of the system shall be covered until it has been Inspected and approved for use. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant for the permit to notify Land & Resource Management that the Installation Is ready for inspection. Permit: Permission is hereby granted to the above named applicant to perform the work described in the above statement. This permit is granted upon express con­ dition that the person to whom it is granted, and his agent, employees and workmen shall conform in all respects to the Sanitation Code of Otter Tail County, Minnesota. This permit may be revoked at any time upon violation of the Sanitation Code. NOTE: This permit is valid for a period of six (6) months. /do./O' 7^0 Permit Fee $Date: Signature of Property Owner/Agem fi Rec. No.Date: Land & Resource Management Office Comments: Form No. BK — 0203-003 313,017 • Victor Lundoon Co.. Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota System design must be to scale and must include the proposed location of the sewage system, all existing/proposed buildings, property lines, the ordinary high water level of the water body, wetlands, bluff and all water wells within 150' of the sewage system. If there are any questions, see the University of Minnesota Site Evaluation worksheets. J I 5"Scale:.grid(s) equals feet, or inch(es) equals feet IS^MPGA LICENSE #: Al Roggenkamp & bons Excavating & trenching 38880 - 620th Ava. :—Wadena. MN 56482 (218) 631-3389 -------1-800»939“5285-------- DESIGNED BY:LICENSE CATEGORY: FIRM NAME:Id'1-0DATE: ADDRESS:SIGNATURE: •: I 1 Ba^ i i I !! !I [ !rI 3* 2 I • <^o\»«?iI -r- - \ r lb /I i I i i ' , I by\^' I Ksur“"ib i I I ! Co I i!"Rpyo II ! I %d t 1!i1I1ii (I iBKX 1003 — 029 • FerguslFalls, MN • 1-800-346-4870, 315.904 • Victor Lundeen'Co,, Printersit11> ’■m RECEIVED OCT 1 5 2004SITE DATA WORKSHEET LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 218-998-8095 www.co.otter-tail.mn.us !, I LArCl&R£SOURC& 172ICSewage Treatment System Permit # ( LyiL^ FIRSTLAST NAME MIDDLE TELEPHONE NUMBER ADDRESS: , Hop 14!/fe.S^^>sry^1 STFL/RT. . ^ CITY STATE ZIP CODE /E /3S~ 3^ SEC.RANGE TWP. NAMELAKE/RIVER NO.LAKE NAME TWP. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:SOIL BORING LOG i4J^^A/uJ-4f 4.^1?COLOR & MUNSELL NO. DEPTH (INCHES)TEXTURE STRUCTURE ^pcjccrf1.^PRISMATIC PARCEL NUMBER N< ‘400^/ Cr£J’^/¥Wf BLOCK 7,^E-911 Address or Directions From Nearest Public Road PRISMATICifl.r^NE <"6L5ci^3NUMBER OF BEDROOMS PLATY PRISMATIC NONE GARBAGE DISPOSAL: YES WELL: CASING DEPTH-^=S2>ft. SEWER LINE SEPARATION: ft. BLUFF: YES BLOCKY PLATY PRISMATIC NONE FLOODPLAIN: YES (^) VEGETATION: AQUATIC ^TfR^ESTR^ BLOCKY PLATY PRISMATIC NONE oSLOPE AT INSTALLATION SITE:% TYPE OF OBSERVATION: Probe Pit PARENT MATERIAL: No Outwash Loess Bedrock Alluvium ^ -3 O'- ^ ^ ORIGINAL SOIL:Date of Soil Boring. (©COMPACTED SOIL; Yes 2 R-Sa-oiADEPTH OF BORING (To 7' or restrictive layer):.ft.Date of Perc Test PERC TEST #2PERC TEST #1 - TWO TESTS ARE REQUIRED - INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATETIME /o¥o Sto:oc START Time drop perc1 ILOto3^1.7 TIME DROP perc TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATE.y tIdREFILLrefill10. I -toI.LO iP.i7TIMEDROPPERC TIME DROP PERC TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATE r7.0 REFILL REFILLi (0 . I -to1./1.0 LQ..1^y.PERCTIMEDROP TIME DROP PERC TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATE TIME INTERVAL(MINUTES) REFILL WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATEREFILL TIME PERCMOP TIME DROP PERC TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATEREFILL REFILL TIME DROP PERC TIME DROP PERC WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATETIMEINTERVAL (MINUTES)TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATEREFtaREFILL TIME DROP PERC TIME DROP PERC WATER DEPTHTIMEINTERVAL (MINUTES) WATER DROP PERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATEREFiaREFia TIME DROP PERC TIME DROP PERC TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES) WATER DEPTH WATER PROP PERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP PERC RATEREFILLREFia TIME DROP PERC TIME DROP PERC PROPOSED DESIGN: X XTRENCHBED.ATGRADE.MOUND.HOLDING TANK. GRAVITY DIST..PRESSURE DIST.. SEWER LINE.OUTHOUSE.OTHER SPECIFY:. — SYSTEM DESIGN ON BACK — i i Z>received OCT 1 5 2004 MOUND DESIGN WORKSHEET (For Flows up to 1200 gpd) / I A. ROW Estimated gpd or measured Eninuttetl Stwige Flows In GsUons per day ____________ IWd} __________ Nomber ’ITlypelTVpenT)T>emofgpd.X 1.5 =.Berbcorm 180as2300 60%2183 .450 300 of (heB. SEPTIC TANK LIQUID VOLUMES / 0 c£>^ S' CO gallons C. SOILS (refer to site evaluation) 1. Depth to restricting layer = inches 2. Depth of percolation tests = 3. Texture Percolation rate 4. Land slope Q % 2566003754 values2944505750in3326900525TypeL37060071050da40886751200incotunsu feet Liquid apKif)' wirhditpouSfc lift Icdde ^(ufrt)ernf Mini mure Uq\dd Cafadfy Lbfidd cepediy witfi (irtHtfe dUpoMif'L.inches iivka3«ir< 1 nr ft 15007501135/ 0 mpi 2000100015003X0)3X 2250 4000200030X D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS 1. Multiply flow rate by 0.83 to obtain required area of rock layer: A x 0.83 = HS'O gpd X0.83 sq. ft-/gpd = 3'T^sq. ft. 2. Select width of rock layer (max 10' if <120 mpi max 5’) = / Q ft. 3. Length of rock layer = area + width = 3 IS' sq. ft. -1- / O ft. = 3 7.0'ft. Width Jo ft <120mpi <10' >120mpi <5' % Length 31.^ ft E. ROCK VOLUME Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock:37Ssq. ft. x / ft. = 37^ cu. ft. Divide cu, ft. by 27 cu. ft./cu. yd. to get cubic yards; 3 7S' cu. ft. + 27 = /3F^cu. yd. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons:/3.Sifcu. yd. x 1.4 ton/cu. yd. =/?.^ons. 1. 2. 3. F. ABSORPTION WIDTH 1. Percolation rate in top 12 inches of soil is / O mpi Texture Absorption Width Sizing Ihble (Vscoladoo Rau In Minutes per Inch (Mh) Gallons per day per square foot Ratio of Abserpnon widih to Rod Layer Width Soil Teanire Faster than 0.1 0.1 to 5 0.1 to 5 610 15 16 IS 30 311045 46 to 60 60 to 120 Slower than 120 Coarse Sand 1.20 1.00Sand1.20 I 002. Select allowable soil loading rate from table; * 7^ gpd/fP 3. Calculate adsorption width ratio by dividing rock layer loading rate of 1.20 gpd/ft2 by allowable soil loading rate; 1.20gpd/fP+.^2i_gpd/fe= . Roe Sand Sandy Loam 060 2.00 0 79 I 52 t nnfQ 0.60 200 Silt Loam Clay Loam OJ50 240 0.45 2.67Clay0.24 5.00 Clay 0.20 6.00t : 4. Multiply adsorption width ratio by rock layer width to get required adsorption width;9 f^ X / ^ ft ~ \ ■ ■■■ •' . i '• » ■ ..•: : ;.— ■- f.;;^-VV-V. •.•■.*. • . r.‘ ■- 'r................• • • ■••• • .. ‘ ;.;•• .'■•'• V-'.': ••.• *.j-yy .•>.•\' >*, ;i*. Soil Characteristics and Required Areas for Sewage Treatment ;Percolation Rate in Minutes per inch (MPI) Square feet pa gallon; per day Soil Texture j iFaster than 0.1 * 0.1 toS 0.1 to 5 < 6 to 15 16 to 30 31 to45 46 to 60 Slower than 60*** Coarse Sand f Sand 0.83 I Fine Sand ** Sandy Loam Loam Silt Loam Clay Loam 1.67 ; 1.27 1.67 100 120 ; Clay * Soil too coarse for sewage treatmenL Use systems for rapidly permeable soils. ** Soil having 50% or more of fine sand plus very fine sand. ***Sotl w|dt digh a peicenuge of clay for installatioa of an ingiound standard system. ; I ;; ;• >•;.rr.i ;•. •*. .■ .' ::> •:• •;*. I ; »• t ■ V : . RERM WIDTH (landslope less than 1%) 1. Absorption width (F.4): /^» feet 2. Calculate minimum mound size a. Determine depth of clean sand fill at upslope edge of rock layer: Separation: 3' ft = / feet b. Add depth of clean sand for separation (2a) at upslope edge, depth of rock layer (1 foot) to depth of cover (1 foot) to find the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer: / ft + 1ft + 1ft = 3 feet c. Multiply upslope mound height by^ to find berm width: 3 x5= _3_ feet d. The total landscape width is the sum of berm (G.2c) width plus rock layer width (D.2) plus berm width(G.2c): ^ ft + / O ft + ^___ft = S feet e. Subtract the landscape width (G.2d) from the adbsorption width (F.4) to find the additional width necessary for absorption: ft - ft = ~f ^ feet (If less than zero, no additional width is needed. Therefore, skip step f and go to g.) f. Add the additional width (G.2e) to the berm width (G.2c) Final berm width: g. Total mound width is the sum of berm (G.2f (use G.2d if step f was skipped)) width plus rock layer width (D.2) plus berm width(G.2f or G.2d): ^ ft + f ^ ft + ft = feet h. Total mound length is the sum of berm (G2.f or G.2d) plus rock layer length (D.3) plus berm (G.2f or G.2d): 9 ft +32cT ft + __ft = feet i. Setbacks from the rockbed are calculated as follows: the absorption width (F.4) minus tlie rock bed width (D.2) divided by 2: (AST - f O ft) 2 = Z feet G.Cover 1’Landslope:___% slope rado 4 :1 i Pi pa Clean Sand___ Natural Soil. Limiting Layer Bern[ WidthRock WidthBerm Width 1 Absorption Width ft +ft =feet 11 setback (i) iTTT Berm Width A y f ' r WidthOSSffcSiSS'll " Berm Width Length____—2 Berm Width Berm Width Absorption Wid h /5TZ-T3 ■a4^ rf. ‘ >1 Total Length 3~setback (i) Covyr r -i-;- G. MOUND SLOPE WIDTH & LENGTH (landslope 1% or more) 1. Subtract rock layer width from absorption ~~ width to obtain minimum downslope width feet 2. Calculate minimum mound size a. Determine depth of clean sand fill at upslope edge of rock layer; Separation 3’ - b. Add depth of clean sand for separation (2a) at upslope edge, depth of rock layer (1 foot) to depth of cover (1 foot) to find the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer; ft + 1ft + 1ft = c. Enter table with landslope and upslope ratio. Select berm multiplier of. d. Multiply berm multiplier by upslope mound height to find upslope width: feet e. Multiply rock layer width by landslope to determine drop in elevation; feet f. Add depth of clean sand for slope difference (2e) at downslope rock edge, to the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer (2b) to find the downslope mound height; feet Landslope;___% Rockr slope ratio_;__V A jjjpv! Clean Sand_j ^ ' ' Natural Soil.Limiting layer ft-ft =Downslope WidthUpslope Width Rock Width Absorption Width ft =feet SLOPE MULTIPLIEU TABLE DOWNSLOPE multlplieni for various slope ratios UPSLOPE multipliers for various slope ratios Land SIrme, 3:1 4:1 S;1 6:1 7:1M____Sil3:1 4:1 5:1 6:1feet 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.03.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.00 3.09 4.17 5.26 6.38 7.532.91 3.85 4.76 5.66 6.54 7.411 3.19 4.35 5.56 6.82 8.142.83 3.70 4.54 5.36 6.14 6.902 3.30 4.54 5.88 7.32 8.862.75 3.57 4.35 5.08 5.79 6.453 3.41 4.76 6.25 7.89 9.722.68 3.45 4.17 4.84 5.46 6.064 X 3.53 5.00 6.67 8.57 10.772.61 3.33 4.00 4.62 5.19 5.715 3.66 5.26 7.14 9.38 12.072.54 3.23 3.85 4.41 4.93 5.416 3.80 5.56 7.69 10.34 13.732.48 3.12 3.70 4.23 4.70 5.137 % -i- 100 =3.95 5.88 8J3 11.54 15.912.42 3.03 3.57 4.05 4.49 4.88B 4.11 6.25 9.09 13.04 18.922.36 2.94 3.45 3.90 4.30 4.659 4.29 6.67 10.00 15.00 23.332.31 2.86 3.33 3.75 4.12 4.4410 4.48 7.14 11.11 17.65 30.432.26 2.78 3.23 3.61 3.95 4.2611 4.69 7.69 12.50 21.43 43.752.21 2.70 3.12 3.49 3.80 4.0812 ft +ft = g. Enter table with landslope and downslope ratio. Select downslope multiplier of. h. Multiply downslope multiplier by downslope mound height to get downslope width: feet i. Compare the values of step G.l and Step G.2h Select the greater of the two values as the downslope width: j. Total mound width is the sum of upslope (G.2d) width plus rock layer width (D.2) plus downslope width(G.2i); feet X Upslope Width feet Rock BedUpslope Width rST3 TT- Downslope Wdth. Absorption Width 3ft +ft +ft =|9 k. Total mound length is the sum of upslope width (G.2d) plus rock layer length (D.3) plus upslope width (G.2d); ft +ft +ft =feet Total Length. Final Dimensions: X Cover 1' G. MOUND SLOPE WIDTH & LENGTH (landslope 1% or more) 1. Subtract rock layer width from absorption width to obtain minimum downslope width feet 2. Calculate minimum mound size a. Determine depth of clean sand fill at upslope edge of rock layer: Separation 3' - b. Add depth of clean sand for separation (2a) at upslope edge, depth of rock layer (1 foot) to depth of cover (1 foot) to find the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer; ft + 1ft + 1ft = Landslope;___% slope rado__ W, Clean Sand__h ...A ;-53 6" Topsoil NaturaJ Soil. Utnlttng Layer ft =ft-□ownslope WidthUpslope Width Rock Width Absorption Width ft =feet SLOPE MULTIPLIER TABLE DOWNSIOPE multipliers ibr various slope ratios UPSLOPE mnitipllers for various uope ratios Land Slope, ln% 3il 4:1 5:1 6:1 7:13il 4:1 5;1 8:1 7:1 8:1feet ?■3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00c. Enter table with landslope and upslope ratio. Select berm multiplier of. d. Multiply berm multiplier by upslope mound height to find upslope width: 3.09 4.17 5.26 6J8 7J32.91 3.85 4.76 5.66 6J4 7.411 'i 2.83 3.70 4.54 556 6.14 6.90 3.19 455 556 6.82 8.142 35 0 4 5 4 5.08 7.32 6.862.75 3.57 455 5.08 5.79 6.453 ^68 3.45 4.17 4 5 4 5.46 6.06 3.41 4.76 655 7.89 9.724 feetX 2.61 353 4.00 4.62 5.19 5.71 3.53 5.00 6.67 8 57 10.775 e. Multiply rock layer width by landslope to determine drop in elevation; feet f. Add depth of clean sand for slope difference (2e) at downslope rock edge, to the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer (2b) to find the downslope moimd height; feet 254 353 355 4.41 4.93 5.41 3.66 5.26 7.14 958 15076 2.48 3.12 3.70 453 4.70 5.13 35 0 5.56 7.69 1054 13.737 % - 100 =3.95 5.68 853 1154 15.91242 3.03 357 4.05 4.49 4588 4.11 65 5 9.09 13.04 18.92256 2.94 3.45 3.90 4.30 4.659 45 9 6.67 10.00 15.00 2353251 256 3.33 3.75 4.12 44410 ■: 4.48 7.14 11.11 17.65 30.43256 2.78 353 3.61 3.95 456U 4.69 7.69 1250 2143 43.75251 2.70 3.12 3.49 3.80 4.0812 ft =ft + g. Enter table with landslope and downslope ratio. Select downslope multiplier of. h. Multiply downslope multiplier by downslope mound height to get downslope width: feetX ii. Compare the values of step G.l and Step G.2h Select the greater of the two values as the feet iUpslope Width 4I1downslope width: j. Total mound width is the sum of upslope (G.2d) width plus rock layer width (D.2) plus downslope width(G.2i);I 1=----4< § ■r— Downslope Width. Absorption V\fldth 3ft +ft +ft =feet (2 k. Total mound length is the sum of upslope width (G.2d) plus rock layer length (D.3) plus upslope width (G.2d); ft-+"ft-=ft-f-feet Total.Length. Final Dimensions: X G. PERM WIDTH (landslope less than 1%) 1. Absorption width (F.4): l'S‘,1^ feet 2. Calculate minimum mound size a. Determine depth of clean sand fill at upslope edge of rock layer: Separation: 3' -_3r_ ft = / feet b. Add depth of clean sand for separation (2a) at upslope edge, depth of rock layer (1 foot) to depth of cover (1 foot) to find the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer: / ft + 1ft + 1ft = 3 feet c. Multiply upslope mound height by^ to find berm width: 3 x5 = _2_ feet d. The total landscape width is the sum of berm (G.2c) width plus rock layer width (D.2) plus berm width(G.2c): ^ ft+ / O ft+^___ft= S’ feet e. Subtract the landscape width (G.2d) from the adbsorption width (F.4) to find the additional width necessary for absorption: ft - ft = feet (If less than zero, no additional width is needed. Therefore, skip step f and go to g.) f. Add the additional width (G.2e) to the berm width (G.2c) Final berm width:ft + g. Total mound width is the sum of berm (G.2f (use G.2d if step f was skipped)) width plus rock layer width (D.2) plus berm width(G.2f or G.2d): ^ ft + / ^ ft + *7 ft = feet h. Total mound length is the sum of berm (G2.f or G.2d) plus rock layer length (D.3) plus berm (G.2f or G.2d): 9 ft +37q- ft + 9 ft = feet i. Setbacks from the rockbed are calculated as follows: the absorption width (F.4) minus the rock bed width (D.2) divided by 2: (/•S'r 2-ft - ^ ^ ft) + 2 = feet Cover 1'Landslope;___% slope rado 4:1 ■ I^Rockr .f! Clean Sand iii-. ^6" Topsoil^_____WLwjiM Natural So^. Limiting Layer BernjRock WidthBerm Width Width f Absorption Width i ft =feet setback (i) T,•VTv. •V <Width' berm :»■V.I .tVi■tv 1,. A Berm Width Berm Width Absorption Widb :S r#s3 y.i : •X- V•V. VW- <■V •I.-, ■ 1 •>! U;‘i.•J: 7r<V >f ' Total Length 3"^setback (i) K 'I*. . t W'' .* » . u .. ; ■ j-*, \ ; .-‘i • ■ • •' V .•/. . • ■ '■■ •.........................'.■ • ■■:. ■ ■ . . >*• >'.. »:*•• •.• •.>■ ■?•. i t • A V- •• V*»*, *. . • ; Soil Characteristics and Required Areas for Sewage Treatment :Percolation Rate in Minutes per inch (MPl) Square feet ptf gallon paday Soil Texture Faster than 0.1 * 0.1 to 5 0.1 to 3 < 6 to 15 16 to 30 31 to 45 46 to 60 Slower than 60*** Coarse Sand 5- • 0.83 ;Sand Fine Sand** Sandy Loam l-oam Silt Loam QayLoom 1.67 ■.* 1.27 1.67 100 120 Clay * Soil too coarse for sewage tieamiem. Use systems for nqndly permahle soils. ** Soil having 505b or mote of fine sand plus very fine sand. Soil «dih too high a petceniage of day for installadoQ of an ingraund standard system. •••v •mm ■ .•’ * . •;*•%;: ... ,^1 t * *.. : » .* • ■:*■';;r. . V■; r«*., *.i ;•. :: • ’ •/:r* .*;5* .t • •: ... . ■■ ;Vi.u' ■ / ; '\V . *! MOUND DESIGN WORKSHEET (For Flows up to 1200 gpd) <3k/t-ce^■ ‘ V ^^ECEIVED OCT 1 5 2004r• A. FLOW Estimated gpd or measured Number Typenlypel IVpelQofgpd.X 1.5 =Bedroctm (803002252 60»2183 .450 300 of theB. SEPTIC TANK UQUID VOLUMES /Oco^ S~oo gallons C. SOILS (refer to site evaluation) 1. Depth to restricting layer = inches 2. Depth of percolation tests = 3. Tpxtiirp Percolation rate 4. Land slope Q % 2566003754 values2947504505in3326900525Typel.37060071050 Oor40881200675m ■ootunmi lltBUe ftak rimriilw H« laUoH.feet Lfa|uid apaoty wnluflipoulft lifUtkddeNantenrBcdmoBiiMlahnao Uqidd Csfiadty Lkfdd opidty «U) pitavetfspBCtl/•z-inches ISOOIf* lot ]ur4 5i*n r.iiiry 7»IIU/ 0 mpi IMS 200015003000150032504000»no 3000 D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS 1. Multiply flow rate by 0.83 to obtain required area of rock layer: A x 0.83 = O gpd X 0.83 sq. ft/gpd = 37^ sq. ft 2. Select width of rock layer (max 10' if <120 mpi max 5’) = /Q ft. 3. Length of rock layer = area + width =: 3 7-S^ sq. ft + / 0 ft. = 37»5"ft. Width / O ft 2 tl?.I <120mpi <10' >120mpi<5’ ESES3EHES!3IiS332iSiS2ft;i Length 3 7*^ ft E. ROCK VOLUME Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock:37Ssq. ft x / ft. = 31^ CU- ft. Divide cu. ft. by 27 cu. ft/cu. yd. to get cubic yards; 37^ CU. ft + 27 =/JL^cu, yd. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tonst/^.S^cu. yd. x 1.4 ton/cu. yd. s=/2i2^ons. 1. 2. 3. F. ABSORPTION WIDTH 1. Percolation rate in tw \Tl inches of soil is / O mpi Texture Absorptimi 4VUlth Sidiig llible hreololasRiisIs Mimita per Inch (Mft) Callou per day n iqiBRioat RadoofAbutpilan width in Roclc Layer Widtli Soil Texture PanerdiaaO.1 0.1 to 5 0.1 o5 6iolS 16 to 30 31(045 46 to 60 6010(20 Slower than 120 CoaraeSaiid (.20 1.00SmdIJ!0 1.002. Select allowable soil loading rate from table; * gpd/fP 3. Calculate adsorption width ratio by dividing rock layer loading rate of 1.20 gpd/ft2 by allowable soil loading rate; 1.20gpd/ft*4-/7^gpd/fP=: ./.S'2^ . Roe Sand Saodylxtam 0.60 2.00 0.79 1.52Loam0.60 ZOO Sill Loam aayl.oam 050 Z400.45 2.67Clay0.24 5.00Oay0.20 ' 6.00; 4. Multiply adsorption width ratio by rock layer width to get required adsorption vddth; ft=/5"*^ Department of LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OTTER TAIL COUNTY Government Services Center • 540 West Fir Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Ph; 218-998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us November 9, 2004 David W & Dorothy C Adams 40041 County Highway 14 Richville MN 56576-9611 RE: Inspection on Sewage Treatment System Permit #17216, Nonshoreland This is to inform you that an inspection was made on the above mentioned Permit. At that time, we could not complete the inspection and approve the system for use, for the following reason(s): There was not a visual alarm on the lift station. There was not an alarm on the holding tank. There was not a dwelling onsite. >c The non-conforming sewage system had not been destroyed. (Surface discharge of grey water) There was not a well onsite. The Installer had not completed the air test. Our Office has not received the Well Abandonment Certification. Miscellaneous ______ A variance is required for non-complying setbacks: ______ Ordinary High Water Level ______ Lotline ______ Road Right-Of-Way ______ Structure ______ Wetland Be aware that failure of obtaining the variance will result in removal of the non-complying portion of the system. Please contact our office for a reinspection of your sewage system when the problem is corrected. Approval of the system can not occur until this matter is resolved. CC/INSTALLER: ;ire sewage system must be installed prior to the Permit’s expiration date.Note: Thj Pat Eckert/Inspector