HomeMy WebLinkAbout22000100076002_Variances_07-03-2008~l ’■?>"2oo5-’ jf
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that,
this instrument # ^--------
was fiied/recorded iiithis office
for record on the p day of
c::y ^ 2008 at ? /5am/6m )
I ik.cOM ^^ordihgfa^
weil certificate
1046153
41041rTT#
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 998-8095
Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us
Application Fee
/-npco P}-.
L~n iO (•)
COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number
Accepted By / Date 1\ 0%
DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER
MAILING ADDRESS
Sh- 7^4 £o.______LAKE CLASS
0^iyA^rxi\
LAKE NAMELAKE NUMBER
SECTION to TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP NAMERANGE
E-911
ADDRESS
PARCEL
NUMBER f Q^O *]7 6^ gG^-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Cbeo L£tt I, 0K<2^Pr ^ocPS
C^bWt^ Cboc
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
Structure Setback Structure Size Subdivision Cluster Misc.Sewage System
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS
THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION.
~7h^ Ptix) l3ElO
-Xh Ft^om (DHuJl)
PeE^>6 OAfJ-i
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND^HAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND &
RESOURCE MANAGEiyiENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
6^/D-fSIGtWrURE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
Gary Schroeder - Reconsideration of Juiy 3, 2008. (7:43 p.m.)
October 2, 2008 Meeting - After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michaei Harris and
carried with Joe Maske abstaining to approve a variance of 57’ from the required ordinary high water levei setback of 100’ for the
placement of a second level to the existing house 43’ from the ordinary high water level with the condition that an existing garage
with living quarter must be removed within one year from the date of this public hearing. It should be noted that the second story
addition will be 4’ larger than the existing structure, but it will not be any closer to the ordinary high water level then the existing
structure.
'P.Jt f/o3 (PooSr'TimeDate Of Hearing
^ S'
Motion
Gary Schroeder-Denied. (7:21 p.m.)
After discussion and consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Randall Mann and carried with Marion Gill and
Steve Schierer voting no to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship and/or practical difficulties unique to the
property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting the existence of a second
dweiling which is a prohibited use. After additional discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by
Marion Gill to approve the variance as requested with the condition that the second dwelling must be eliminated before a site
permit for the proposed development could be issued. After discussion this motion was withdrawn as this type of condition would
not be appropriate since the second dwelling was a pre-existing nonconformity.
tment —Chaumnan/Otter tml'County Board of Adj^
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
L R Official/Date
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR
bk 0407-001
329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls. Minnesota
I !I
„§GAUftiBiWIN®lifORMI■rI i
c^OQQ 1 Oon V <00
Tax Parcel Number(s)
The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type,
size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high
water level(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also Include all proposed topographical alterations.
Scale %Impervious Surface Ratio
(Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side)
L 1I
:rL_3£m V
O-r-
:l:
—
32
r
4-i
.....
m TfOmep
5G
J 4-CXV1 pp-E!it?m -s-1
4I■|
II
<5^1-b
,1
i:II'S'
(HM-••r—I^2 I I7LuoT"■;
uliI h';
-i(lA -i(1^:I1
m I
tT T2 LI Iriia%5_::|a1^5^10 SfI
r2:
I ('Vr i
r V %I_5'i I
t:“C
Signature of Property'Owner I Date1BK-=.329 086..Veto Lundeen Coi Primers fjalls, MN- ...1-800-346-4870-
F^rgus
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET:
List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing):
Ft2Structure(s):
Ft2Deck(s):i
Ft2Driveway(s):
Ft2Patio(s):
Ft2Sidewalk(s):
Ft2Stairway(s):
Ft2Retaining Wall(s):
Ft2Landscaping;
(Piastic Barrier)
Other:Ft2
Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:
S. / R2LOT AREA:
V'./c.%X100 =
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOTOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT AREA
June 5, 2008
Page # 2
Schroeder - Withdrawn
Gary Schroeder, part of Government Lot 1, Section 10 of Elizabeth Township by Long Lake, requested a variance of
20' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for new construction (entry and stairway) 80’ from the
ordinary high water level. A letter from Shirley and Willis Stelter in support of the variance as requested was noted
for the record. On June 3, 2008 the Secretary of the Board of Adjustment received a phone call from Mr. Gary
Schroeder noting that his plans had changed and that he was withdrawing his variance application.
Scott and LuAnn Vigen - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:08 p.m.)
Scott and LuAnn Vigen, Lot 8 Elmwood Subdivision, Loon Lake in Candor Township, requested a variance of 20’ from
the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of an 18’ by 20’ shop O' from the road right-of-way (on
the property line). The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After
consideration and discussion, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to
approve a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of an 18’ by 20’ shop 0’
from the road right-of-way as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that
no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted the proposed
development will be improvement over the location of the existing structure which is in the road right-of-way.
Arlin and Bonnie Henkelman - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:13 p.m.)
Arlin and Bonnie Henkelman, Lots 7 and 8 Philip Burseth Beach, Wall Lake in Dane Prairie Township, requested the
following: We would like to replace our existing variance for a 16’ by 72’ manufactured home, 5T from shoreline to a
28’ by 52’ approximately 47’ from the ordinary high water level as we feel it would be a more positive appearance.
The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Karen Iverson appeared
with the applicants at the public hearing. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second
by Randall Mann and unanimously carried, to approve the location and size of the new dwelling as depicted on the
drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area
can be covered with impervious surfaces and with the condition that the propose garage cannot exceed 780 square
feet.
Darle and Melva Miller - Tabled (7:25 p.m.)
Darle and Melva Miller, Lots 41 and 42 Block 1 Crystal Beach, West McDonald Lake in Dora Township, requested a
variance of 13’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a dwelling 7’ from the road
right-of-way, a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for a 36’ by 60’ Irregular
shape addition 50’ from the ordinary high water level and variance of 56’ from the required ordinary high water level
setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10’ by 24’ deck 44’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled
with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from the Dora Towns Board of Supervisors in
opposition to the variance as requested was read for the record. At the hearing it was noted that the variance from
the road right-of-way would be 14’ instead of 13’. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion,
second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to table with the verbal permission of the applicant, this variance
application hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment to provide the applicants with an
opportunity to review there proposed development with the Dora Town Board of Supervisors.
Bruce Melin and Kathryn M. Kenna - Denied. (7:40 p.m.)
Bruce Melin and Kathryn M. Kenna, part of Government Lot 6, Section 26 of Candor Township by Loon Lake,
requested a variance of 25’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the location of a structure
75’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as
requested. A letter from Leslie Sass in support of the development as proposed was read for the record. After
consideration and discussion, Carl Zick made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny
the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property and/or practical difficulties had been
shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that the applicants can obtain a
reasonable use of their property without the granting of the variance as requested as the applicants have a large lot
that would appear to have other suitable building locations that would meet the required setback from the ordinary
high water level.