HomeMy WebLinkAbout52000140085002_Variances_08-01-2002Variances
Barcode 128
I
908B47 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that 908 B 4V
this instrument #__________
was filed/recorded in this office for record on the ^ day of ^
___2002 at g
If, County Reco by:t^coidii^ tea//
^well certificate
aWendy L.r^Deputy
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 739-2271
*** COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK 160.Application Fee
Receipt Number
PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE
ADDRESS X
lUb M S3
v<
LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME _____LAKE CLASS .
TOWNSHIP /3C:> RANGESECTION TOWNSHIP NAME
PARCEL NUMBER FIRE/LAKE I.D. NUMBER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PT GL 1 BG 1950.14' S &
632.1 E 200DEG W 66' S 16 DEG W TO LK WLY ALG SHORELN TO LN S 16 DEG W FR BG N 16 DEG E TO BG
EDT FR NW COR S 82 DEG S 16 DEG W 212 S 13
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
structure Setback Structure Size____Sewage System____Subdivision Cluster Misc.
SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED n ^ ^
aA-^^ I Bo<jA)d.c^ -iokx^
» up Ufi ;,p
^ ^ ^ *i rseffo’Xh Icrh. '•>
^ ^ ^ 'J. A' yx\ -^S 'f^>^(r£Z-e\ f, X'otS U_> o O ^ c/ ^ ^
■^<bU
iA3
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO
CONTACT LAND &SOURC EMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
:2i
DATEOF PROPERTY OWNERSIGI
PPilCANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
harems' 1- 3
1^1%^6 -OV'I
~ 0^0 X
- OX) 5-
du^
f>X\
U}\b
-00(fi
-O'Vl
^ 3 - 01)
^3 -^OD
CW/>. "^kldA
^ & R(pfficial/DateAccepted By Land & Resource
/liXXy'. lx3lJ^'7.' a L /^xr\./ <^OOS TimeDate Of Hearing
3
Motion
Stephen and Carol Askew - Approved request number 2. (7:36 p.m.)
Motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Frank Lachowitzer and unanimously carried, to approve (request
number 2) combined Lots A and B, as depicted on the applicant drawing, as a buildable lot for residential purposes. It
should be noted that the variance as granted does not restrict the applicants from applying to the Planning
Commission for the platting of their property into two lots.
CtiatfmaiVOtter Tail County Board of Adjustment
Per(^(s) required from Land & Resource Management
A Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
/
No
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR
bk 0198-001
291.306 • Victor Lundeen Co., Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota'
\
.25'40'tS82100.00
100.00 &
fl >
>55
cr^OJ>Ss
cuo9sCOOJoouOJOJcu
CO
. o
kD•S.
cuo1^o \Dr\oukDO (/)UD 00
00
100.00
^8"50'00"V
93.10>
55
CO
LO t“*'H JiA00 'i0^
in M7R°50'00"ykDo
n 100.00100,00(/)
gfl
f U>>^0
5%kD CUcuCOCOcuOJ00ou/r--00
>«—i
in.cuCOooocuvDvD
CO 2 1^-. t'T7)
g: S7T54'OO'E
55g„l4T26| 100.00 4 I
0?l0"£^oO'-‘.A*
1
Augusv 1, 2002
■ ^ Page U 3
Anthony Wayne Snyder - Approved as modified with conditions. (7:13 p.m.)
Anthony Wayne Snyder, Richville, MN, requested a variance of 65’ from the required or<3inary high water
level setback of 200', a variance of 10’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ and a variance of
2’ from the 20’ maximum height of a non-dwelling structure for the construction of a 32’ by 34’ garage 135’
from the ordinary high water level, 10’ from the road right-of-way and having an overall height of 22’. The
property is described as Lot 8, First Addition to Freeman Beach, Dead Lake in Dead Lake Township. A
letter from Mervin L and Phyllis I Freeman in support of the variance as requested was read for the record.
The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was
made by Steve Schierer, second by Mark Steuart to deny the variance as request. After additional
discussion the previous motion was withdrawn. Motion was then made by Steve Schierer, second by Mark
Steuart and unanimously carried, to approve the placement of a non-dwelling structure at least 120’ from
the ordinary high water level with the condition that it meets all other requirements of the ordinance and
with the condition that no more than 25% of the total lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces after
completion of the proposed development. It was noted that there is adequate space to meet the required
road right-of-way setback.
Charlotte Ladwig - Approved as requested. (7:30 p.m.)
Charlotte Ladwig and Pelican Township, Pelican Rapids, MN, requested a variance to install a 250 square
foot drain field in that part of the dedicated road that is outline on the plat enclosed with this application.
The area that we are proposing to install the drain field is presently outside of any existing roadbed. We
will need to cross Jacob’s Beach Trail with one insulated sewer line that will run from the septic tank on Lot
15 to the drain field in the proposed area. The Pelican Township Board has reviewed our intention and
their approval has been documented in the enclosed letter. The property is described as Lot 15, Jacobs
. Beach First Addition, Prairie Lake in Pelican Township. Chuck Watkins, contractor, appeared along with
the applicant. A letter from Pelican Township addressing the variance as requested was read for the
record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or againsWhe request. After consideration,
motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Frank Lachowitzer and carried with Mark Steuart voting
no, to approve the installation of a 250 square foot drain field in that part of the dedicated road that is
outline on the drawing which was enclosed with the applicant’s application. It was noted that this is
perhaps the best location for the installation of a drain field and that it will greatly improve the existing
situation. Hardship is a substandard lot of record.
Stephen and Carol Askew - Approved request number 2. ’^7:36 p.m.)
Stephen and Carol Askew, Coon Rapids, MN, requested a variance from the 5-acre minimum requirement
of the Subdivision Controls Ordinance that requires metes and bounds parcels to be 5 acres for residential
building in the shoreland area. We have 2 lots, Lot A is 1.2 acres and Lot B is 1.2 acres. Request number
1 is to have each lot declared buildable for residential use as a separate lot. If that is not possible, request
number 2 is for the combined lots, Lots A and B, to be declared buildable for residential use as one parcel.
The lots would be in conformance with the shoreland-zoning ordinance in all other regards. The property is
described as part of Government Lot 1, Section 14 of Pine Lake Township by Big Pine Lake. The audience
was polled with Rick Miller speaking to the variance as requested. After consideration, motion was made
by Steve Schierer, second by Frank Lachowitzer and unanimously carried, to approve (request number 2)
combined Lots A and B, as depicted on the applicant drawing, as a buildable lot for residential purposes. It
should be noted that the variance as granted does not restrict the applicants from applying to the Planning
Commission for the platting of their property into two lots.
SC