The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About52000040021005_Variances_07-09-1992Variances 2 Barcode 128 731442 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA !0 5ll(Receipt No. Application Fee $t cLA-y^ Last Name Fits! /^/7V 5/ C.- &/^?^3/-S0SSPhone:Owner:Middle Zip No.stateCityStreet 4 No. /?D^ro - }3o Lake ClassLake NameLake No. 3^yjc>6L Twp. NameRangeTwp.Sec. i^O /Iop 6-L 3 l^N :KSo7' o-f € Cor, €xt -f-F, £/c Pli-ff^A BP /LOLegal Description:Fire No. or Lake ID # 0^' 3L0" £y ’To ZA/ 0^ L 3 (J^.SCp S3i-0d0 ^OH '^0:xi -OdXParcel Number ilSL » uJ oo ToVARIANCE REQUESTED IS:0-4^ SiV u3X— Os-AAik-^ . AJL^oJAoAftAx ^i/7Vcrv^ 'IX) .-Aidl vIa/s^ vyO^TS-ry,>Jiy_A^AJL0— Request a variance to split off a parcel of less than 2.5 acres from an existing 11.56 acres parcel. In order to properly evaluate the situation, please provide as much supplementary information as possible, such as: maps, plans, information about surrounding property, etc. APPLICANT SHALL BE PRESENT AT THE SCHEDULED HEARING. I understand that I have applied for a variance from the requirements of the Shoreiand Management Ordinance of Otter Tail County. I understand I must contact my township in order to dete\ are required by the township for my proposed project. whether or not any additionai variance and/or permits Q iV 19 . X i Oyf/\ _ JA iU A.X g_Application dated Signature Of Applicant ¥ir^19Date of hearing: ___ MOTION AS FOLLOWS: . Time: Motion was made by Bert Olson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested. A surveyor's drawing of the parcel is to be presented at the time of y-j Cotmiy ot Otic« . I htrkiy ctifity Ihit Hn vrittiin Inttmownt wac tied recording. /lorVacord In this otflca HW WM duly MkraflkTMd ■ Dm on itM A.D. 19 SCANNED Chairman Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) from Land & Resource Manwement required: -m QtbYESNO mailed copy of Application to Applicant.(Date/lnitial) MKL — 0483-001 258,371 — Victor Luntleen Co.. Printers. Fergus Faiis, Minnesota O /V" / - • i*t ,v >« ••r : - -r.VA"- •*x. .• '<^v :-r.-. -V ■r. VV. - - I. ' ?-•'• . ■ '■**■■.. . ■'•• ' ;•-r •».•V»■• ¥•* ±. " .,>s .•• 4 ''■ *3'V •• . V -t y; oE?/G^ ^ yQc/ees V r v" • ', • ■'. ' ■'* ■■ /=>£./>7'7~'^0 C ,^ 4- .■./ %. '■77?/J C 7^ ,:k V .'' •*• •■ . -•■ ’./C• J- •■:r w5■;v 30 x:^ <S '■■' 'c ^ 2-■• ?■*»r .7 ■.■if'' •;#T*■'"■■''■ 1........... - - ■’’-W ;■ . >'. -» ''' i j- ■ . V-. ■» A ■5?•*’ .;■ K ^ ■•.. ' ’y-vv^" . 7;j; JW r.\ -V- .-4' ' '.r-.ir--y" ^A ■ -;m •, ■ ■*-1'£ i.-ao. ' -.f A& ■'*■ %■!;■'> .- ••• •.r'“3i •;.;^- w’i -r-V- -►‘*u •*■''•’ 5y- ■■y y ' -•< . ><■. •vy-;5*7-:.;:>4::“i -4”. ■>. V - f!‘i •*•?,5 ■>’' -1' -' ' * S' “ - - . S»%r ■>V;---4-' . -i *;■ Vc-' ■ - " - ’\K~p\»-r -A. !• t:It' ’•• V -::*■^.'Vk''"9 .7'4' ’r7‘'“?“•• I r««4 (i>.>•i''-v;*■;’ > *I Pago 3. July 9th. 1992 I i IKTnTSTierman - Approved Kim Sherman, Erie, KS. requested a variance to be allowed to repair and upgrade an existing cabin and to perhaps add a porch meeting the shoreland ordinance requirements. The applicant owns a lot with 50' of lake frontage. The required lake frontage for a general development lake Is 100'. The property Is described as part of Government Lot 1, Section 2 of Clltherall Township on West Battle Lake. Everett Sherman represented the applicant at this hearing. The audience was polled with Robert Sherman and Wayne Tucker speaking in favor of this variance request. After consideration, motion was made by John Everts, seconded by Craig Anderson and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested. The lot has adequate square footage and the granting of this variance will not increase the pressure on this lake. The granting of this variance will not establish a precedent in the Immediate district. The tract was originally recorded as agricultural farmer land as It was separated from the lake by railroad property. The railroad property has since been acquired by the applicant. * John Gronemon - Approved John Groneman, Wahpeton, ND, requested a variance of 5' from the required east side lot 11ne( lot 2) setback of 1 O' for the construction of an addition to the existing cabin and a variance of 1 '6" from the required west side lot 11ne( lot 4) setback of 10' for the expansion of an existing shed. The property Is described as Lot 3 of Second Addition to Sanda's Beach and a 50' extension of Lot 3 of Second Addition to Sanda's Beach, East Battle Lake In Girard Township. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Dan Oehler and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 5' from the required east side lot 11ne( lot 2) setback of 1 O' for the construction of an addition to the existing cabin and a variance of 1 '6" from the required west side lot 11ne( lot 4) setback of 10' for the expansion of on existing shed with the condition that on existing 4' by 6' structure be removed. Applicant will be maintaining the existing building lines and will not be any closer to the lot lines than the present structures. Hardship being a substandard lot of record. Russel] and Gall Green - Approved Russell and Gall Green, Wadena, MN, requested a variance to split off a parcel of less than 2.5 acres from an existing 11.56 acres parcel. The property Is described as part of Government Lot 3, Section 4 in Pine Lake Township on Big Pine Lake. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Bert Olson, seconded by John Everts and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested. A surveyor's drawing of the parcel is to be presented at the time of recording. The parcel being split off is serviced by a township road. Paul Allen Harvego - Approved Paul Allen Harvego, Litchfield, MN, requested a 11 to 13' variance from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' for the placement of a 27' by 38' two bedroom home on Lot 4, Block 3 of Echo Ranch Riviera 5th Addition. Otter Tall Lake In Otter Tall Township. Jerry Peterson represented the applicant at the hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request, After consideration, motion was made by Craig Anderson, seconded by Dan Oehler and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 1 1 to 13' from the required ordinary high water level setback of 75' for the placement of a 27' by 38' two bedroom home on the applicant's lot. The structure will be behind the existing building line and an adequate sewage disposal system exists for this lot.