The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About51000990322000_Variances_09-06-2007Variances Barcode 128 Stfkmhiv O’I OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA 10^6131 1026131 I hereby certify that this instrument #_ filed/recorded in this officewasfor record on the / ^ day o ipm unty/lHecorder byi recording ree weil certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us DAYTIME PHONB^lg") ^ S3'3^361 VkJ Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date /l)c An.# '% LAKE NAME TOWNSHIP /3 (g RANGE O 3 *) TOWNSHIP NAME OOO PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS "i) <rU ) C'S LAKE CLASSLAKE NUMBER M A tAT\SECTION OO 51000^%"/A-bT TO ftgrouiiu RJE-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER R-AJb 3tz ^ usy Lot ot 0L.K 1 AeRoviL.u^ LoT^ 7'«- IO 3 Lk. ^/^/L(L(fZS /u LEGAL DESCRIPTION To /5i- O I Cl a TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Subdivision ^ Cluster Misc.Structure Size Sewage SystemStructure Setback SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. ^ to 1® Lcr 4^ to (?T A r~T Aciv. Cc r LA~\z.*r fO /\/ O ^ P «. < T' ^ "io 1^t o Yv\C s/'-'vyA i V*i I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION-CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. E^TS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & MG THIS MATTER. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTI^ RESOURCFWlANAGEMEf^T y-/r-oy SIGNAYuRE of property owner / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 9031TimeDate Of Hearing T Motion Gerald E. and Robin G. Lowe - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (9:02 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve the permanent attachment of Lot 9 Block 1 to Lot 9 Block 2 and the permanent attachment of Lot 10 Block 1 to Lot 10 Block 2 with the following conditions: 1.) the area within the back lots cannot be used when determining impervious surface coverage for front lot development and 2.) no residential/dwellings can be placed on the back lots. Chairman/Otter tail County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) )L- No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls. Minnesota J.J,J, SeiAliE^P,RAWINGilf0RMI..IM i Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type, size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high water level(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also include all proposed topographical alterations. oI s,%Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) 4 !.!z:X2l:/-Od I 4J 1 4 ■4Lf 1 Vf I i Vit\ 4-L_'p I s £--LQI (txD iXJ rr ,r"o1ISQD0:......I"’I __4:JIiff:r ••[4! iC Dja1PP\-I r\JI i r.?IQ i :r|i fs.' :.S¥ ■t- I "T 14 vJ pfur -T"i r,r T •A 4f -j u r I I { Ifp InT L,H 1 4 -I^4-'-ti--1 £fc fIp I■Itt f I3:1G II-I 1 / I4- I. _i B m Babatet4!-4329;086..'Lundeen|coBK —Falls, MN-» -.l-800-346-4870 -•Vlcio PrifUers-*- Fergus hH-I 1 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): Ft2Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s): Ft2Driveway(s): Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s): Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Waii(s): Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: Ft2LOT AREA: .%X100 = IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE September 6, 2007 Page # 5 Gerald E. and Robin G. Lowe - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (9:02 p.m.) Gerald E. and Robin G. Lowe, Lot 9 Block 1 and Lots 9 and 10 Block 2, Aerovilla, requested a variance to separate Lot 9 and Lot 10, two contiguous back lots, for the purpose of permanently attaching Lot 9 Block 2 to Lot 9 Block 1 and Lot 10 Block 2 to Lot 10 Block 1. The audience was polled with Chad and Lacey Thiel speaking in support of the variance as requested. A letter from Kelli Wegscheid in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve the permanent attachment of Lot 9 Block 1 to Lot 9 Block 2 and the permanent attachment of Lot 10 Block 1 to Lot 10 Block 2 with the following conditions: 1.) the area within the back lots cannot be used when determining impervious surface coverage for front lot development and 2.) no residential/dwellings can be placed on the back lots. Franklin Lake Condominium Association/Robert and Sara Wasvick - Denied. (9:08 p.m.) Franklin Lake Condominium Association and Robert and Sara Wasvick, Unit 6, Franklin Lake Condos Community No. 31, Franklin Lake in Dunn Township, requested a variance of 35’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 10' by 24’ screen porch addition 65’ from the ordinary high water level. Scott King, Contractor, represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested, the proposed development is advancing towards the ordinary high water level and other alternatives should be considered by the applicant that will not advance the structure towards the ordinary high water level. Timothy M. Birkeland Et Al - Approved the variance as requested. (9:20 p.m.) Timothy M. Birkeland Et Al, part of Government Lot 5, Section 24 of Dora Township by Big McDonald and Brown Lakes, requested the following; The existing storage building is located 32’ from the side lot line and the proposed addition would also be 32’ from the side lot line. We are requesting a variance of 18’ from the side lot line of the existing storage building as part of the CIC and a variance of 18’ for the proposed 50’ by 96’ addition to the existing storage building. The storage units will be individually owned and used for personal storage and not for commercial or residential purposes. Paul Jenson, Attorney, appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Marvin Hexum speaking for the variance as requested. A letter from Marvin Hexum in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and carried with Les Estes and Michael Harris voting no, to approve the variance as described in the application dated August 16, 2007 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application. Hardship is the change in the use of the property from private to a Common Interest Community which required a 50’ side lot line setback. Debbra L. Dalos - Tabled. (9:30 p.m.) Debbra L. Dalos, Lots 89 and 90 Sater-Humphrey Camp Ranch, Ten Mile Lake in Tumuli Township, requested the following: Request for a variance to build 3’ south of the northerly line of the property and 1 ’ west of the easterly line of the property. I would build a 22’ by 22’ garage. The required lot line setback is 10’ and the required road right-of-way setback is 20’. The proposed location for the 22’ by 22’ garage requires a 7’ variance from the northerly lot line, a 9’ variance from the easterly lot line and a 19’ variance from the road right-of-way. Steve Langlie, Surveyor, appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Pat Eidal speaking for the variances as requested. A letter from Tumuli Township in support of the proposed location was read for the record. In addition, a letter from John Dalos, Roberta Dalos and Debbra Dalos indicating no objections to the requested variances was read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to table this hearing until the October 4, 2007 meeting to allow the applicant an opportunity to consider other possible locations on the property for the proposed development. ' I I 311I $jj ^ /o5. a j-ifj ' «y~ - ,------1C -'' Oc « / N . I yoo.S3> 5 ^ t« Ir' \'-------j?«v'C;> '? '-------"(y (K'Z/^->'o''li *v ^ Nfy«y ^4'Jp, % ^ \'*V'- -§ • \l Al > lOt? n «< ,-/36^) \. ’ V 'IK <3OjNQ <34»>> 7 6 il 5 ^kG\cy 5c< -.w \^ «\ \ —* N iO \^/,6oo; / ^^gooo)l>i ^;i9o<>>I-o\i3 v^>•Iro;I ; C3''"It !'At WQ' ^i? i2 o) b i »<Itr06' /OO'/ca'/CC '1.iOOi^a\\\c</4^13 c<- - /V< <S^c " /6'II0^'^’H\« # l4 16 «. \-/V. S4- * /€ ' >- --------- -------0--.....................o—-------------- I .4/06' _ /OO' V /CO' k ^ j. (/cpo^ <0 >1 ^op I 7 \\ 6 \\ 5 5 |~?T7?n -9HI 8 1% \ a’ fQ ‘ik . 1 1 i»a' L!0 C K iSS-TX (^^■'°°'^.0\ \ii^lv'*3i^3!<S7\/OO'l£Ol—h ^\n. . /'^OP'^ ■a^' 10 - - s.s 2\ 12^Vo (/«»' r*\o 13-%SO'UNPLAliIVO/.w/'iMf 2y iSlfr^C 9» /^TT/1<:H4i|(yr part of PI attfo part60V. Lot I2WC■OC•|^f PLAI•«: R /»