HomeMy WebLinkAbout49000270205009_Variances_04-06-2006Variances
2
Barcode 128
997826
B96404
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
I hereby certify
this instrument #—r —
was filed/recorded in this office
for recprd on the__L^day of ^in this officil^ .day of
________ 2006 atil^D^pm
ecording fe
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
I hereby certify that .
this instrument <t_
was filed/recorded in this office
for record on.the I tT
------^ P/^aJ ?nimat ^ o^mjfijTn
Wendy
by;
o/recoroeo in tnis ottice rd on4he JX__day of
llMetcalf, County F^obrder
IXhBccjy
.recording fe
-Well certificate
.recording .well certifi^te
A'
m
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 998-8095
Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us
Application Fee
Receipt NumbeL
fEB 13 Z006
land & RtSOURCE
COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK
PROPERTY OWNER l>in<K j\. ^A(FPl^
MAILING ADDRESS {?-d. 6c)( 5/r s^54>/
Accepted By / Date
DAYTIME PHONE
LAKE CLASSLAKE NUMBER <51?- 3 / LAKE NAME____
SECTION ^7 TOWNSHIP )3 / RANGE ^>37 TOWNSHIP NAME Q<<^ltuer
r
Ne'
PARCEL
NUMBER RH^looo^vo^o r?^3 E-911
ADDRESS
•s-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
//.^O AcieS
QX-.- 1- %f uuy '2.^ ^^X Tif^S
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
structure Setback Structure Size Sewaae System Subdivision )(" Cluster Misc.
v>
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BREIF AS
THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. (ajL. fl> CfieA'U A 2 Ace.^
ro/) SacK ^~*4 4z> ^ /l.^o M-rs' yhAcr^ Lt>'i:
^3^
^^c/eStfd ^fU. iS
Ir^ — Ci>^X ^ fJ 4 It/ult ^iTc/
li 'Thii /$ Yv ko'f r£>«^#c i/(U
oj^ drtiue^ u.Atj 4 H' ix®/'* —Yr
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND 2,0
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. W
I ALSO UNDERSTANCJJtHAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND &
JRC6l0iANA<3EMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
^^IGNATURE OF PRO^^ OWNER'
J¥i^<
DATE
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
SCANNED
Date Of Hearing <P! i L 300 ^Time '7-o^/’'n
Motion
Richard A & Debora K Gappa - Denied. (7:06 p.m.)
After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and carried with Paul
Larson and Rick Wilson voting no to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property
had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and approving the variance as
requested would create a grossly substandard lot.
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR.
Reconsideration of the Richard A and Debora K Gappa (7:10 p.m.)
Thursday, May 4, 2006
L R'Official/Date
After the April 6,2006 Board of Adjustment meeting it was noted that the applicants’ variance application contained an
incorrect lake classification, therefore, this application is being presented at this hearing to the Board of Adjustment to
determine if the outcome would have been the same had the Board known the correct lake classification.
Richard A & Debora K Gappa - Approved the variance application as requested with a condition. (7:10 p.m.)
After review, consideration and discussion at the May 6, 2006 Board of Adjustment meeting, Steve Schierer made a motion seconr
by Midiffa^tM^s and carried with Joe Maske abstaining, to approve the proposed subdivision as described in the variance
applicationvdatednEebriiLSi^oSFaEQO&iand as depicted on the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that i
registered surveyor’s drawing must be presented at the time of conveyance. The Board noted that the variance as approved will
create a metes and bounds parcel that exceeds the minimum required size for platted back lots on a general development lake anc
which is also consistent with the size of other back lots in this immediate area.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
S 99*37‘21“ V 920. SO
1,
—27-1/4 COR. iJJ-37
— —- —._____ro CENTER OF CIRCLE
That part of Govarnaant Lot 1. Section 27. Township 131 North. Range 37 '/ast.
Ottartall County. Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 27;
thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 37 minutes 21 seconds Uest along
the north line of said Section 27 a distance of 920.S feet to a point on the
centerline of State Highway 29, said point being on a 5729. 40 foot rgdius highway
curwe, the center of said curve bears South 36 degrees 20 ainutes 35 seconds East
from said point;
thence southerly along said curve 396.32 feet, central angle 3 degrees 57 minutes
48 seconds East from said point:
thence South 39 degrees 37 minutes 21 seconds Vest 425.02 feet;
thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 39 seconds test 310.00 feet to the point of
beginning of the land to be described;
thence continuing South 00 degrees 22 ainutes 39 seconds cast 639.57 feet to the
north line of that land recorded In Book 397 of Deeds, page 481;
thence South 99 degrees 25 ainutes 00 seconds Vest along the north line of said
land 721.37 feet to the southeast corner of that land recorded in Book 405 of
Deeds, page 37;
thence North 38 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds East along the east line of said land
498.23 feet;
thence continuing, along said east Una North 28 degrees 13 ainutes 00 seconds East
254.13 feat;
thence continuing along seid east line North 06 degrees 56 ainutes 00 seconds East
30.50 feet; ^
thence North 89 degrees 37 ainutes 21 seconds East 284.77 feet to the point of beginning. ___ _ j
Containing 7.02 /teres more or less.
SYMBOLS
- 1/2“ PIPE SET. MARKED KITH A PLASTIC
CAP NUMBERED RL313077
= IRON SURVEY MONUMENT POUND
DLU
<
OC/D
Prepared For:
RICHARD GAPPA
CURTIS J. STOECKEL
Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor
1315 M. Nokmie AJejemnarlt. m 5630$
.“h. 3S0-7«3~4$SS Fee S2a~7$3-«34i 3016
s April 6,2006
Page # 2
Roberta Holman and Pamela Suchor - Denied. (6:47 p.m.)
Roberta Holman and Pamela Suchor, part of Lot 6, Inlet Beach, Lake Lida in Lida Township, requested
a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of 20’ by 24’
garage 0’ from the road right-of-way. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the
variance as requested. A letter from Mark and Bobbie Holman in support of the variance as requested
was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by
Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship
unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested
and the development as proposed does not fit with the measurements provided in the application and
other supporting documentation.
John H and Barbara Hansen - Approved the requested variance with a condition. (7:02 p.m.)
John H and Barbara Hansen, Lot 5 Falk’s Beach, Little Pine Lake in Pine Lake Township, requested a
variance of 8’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the replacement of a roof located 2’ from
the lot line. The audience was polled with James Diehl questioning the width of the overhang. After
discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously
carried, to approve a variance of 8’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for the replacement of
a roof located 2’ from the side lot line with the condition that the exterior walls of the existing structure
cannot be reconstructed. Reconstruction does not include painting or new siding which would be
considered normal maintenance for exterior walls. The Board noted the proposed project will not
increase the footprint of the existing dwelling and the proposed project is normal structural
maintenance.
iichard A & Debora K Gappa - Denied. (7:06 p.m.)
Richard A & Debora K Gappa, part of Government Lot 1 and the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter, Section 27 of Parkers Prairie Township by Lake Adley, requested a variance to subdivide a 2
acre parcel (approximately 310’ by 285’ or 88,350 square feet) from an existing 11.4 acre tract.
Minimum size required for a metes and bounds parcel in the shoreland area is 5 acres. Minimum size
required for a platted back lot in the shoreland area is 400’ of width and 160,000 square feet of area.
The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Letters from
Vic Benzinger, Ray Caauwe and George M (Shorty) Revering in support of the variance as requested
were read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second
by Michael Harris and carried with Paul Larson and Rick Wilson voting no to deny the variance as
requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the
granting of the variance as requested and approving the variance as requested would create a grossly
substandard lot.
Michael and Cheryl Nelson - Denied. (7:12 p.m.)
Michael and Cheryl Nelson, West Half of Lot 5 Block 3, Crystal-Lida Beaches, Lake Lida in Lida
Township, requested a variance of 8’ from the required side lot line setback of 10’, a variance of 15’
from the required shore impact zone setback of 50’ and a variance of 65’ from the required ordinary
high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a 6' by 12’ storage shed 2’ from the side lot line
and 35’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or
against the variance as requested. A letter from Tom and Kirsten Anderson in support of the variance
as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a
motion, second by Cecil Femling and carried with Paul Larson voting no, to deny the variance as
requested noting a grossly substandard lot, a very congested area and the fact that had the request
been submitted prior to the placement of the 6’ by 12’ shed the Board would not hayg grantecLthe
requested variances.
May 4, 2006
Page # 3
/
Reconsideration of the Richard A and Debora K Gappa (7:10 p.m.)
The following is the request and action from the Thursday, April 6, 2006 Board of Adjustment
Meeting -
Richard A & Debora K Gappa - Denied at. (7:06 p.m.)
Richard A & Debora K Gappa, part of Government Lot 1 and the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter, Section 27 of Parkers Prairie Township by Lake Adley, requested a variance to subdivide a 2 acre
parcel (approximately 310’ by 285’ or 88,350 square feet) from an existing 11.4 acre tract. Minimum size
required for a metes and bounds parcel in the shoreland area is 5 acres. Minimum size required for a
platted back lot in the shoreland area is 400’ of width and 160,000 square feet of area. The audience was
polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Letters from Vic Benzinger, Ray
Caauwe and George M (Shorty) Revering in support of the variance as requested were read for the record.
After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and carried
with Paul Larson and Rick Wilson voting no to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship
unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and
approving the variance as requested would create a grossly substandard lot.
After the April 6, 2006 Board of Adjustment meeting it was noted that the applicants’ variance
application contained an incorrect lake classification, therefore, this application is being presented
at this hearing to the Board of Adjustment to determine if the outcome would have been the same
had the Board known the correct lake classification.
Richard A & Debora K Gappa - Approved the variance application as requested with a condition.
(7:10 p.m.)
After review, consideration and discussion at the May 6, 2006 Board of Adjustment meeting, Steve
Schierer made a motion second by Michael Harris and carried with Joe Maske abstaining, to approve the
proposed subdivision as described in the variance application dated February 8, 2006 and as depicted on
the drawing submitted with the variance application with the condition that a registered surveyor’s drawing
must be presented at the time of conveyance. The Board noted that the variance as approved will create a
metes and bounds parcel that exceeds the minimum required size for platted back lots on a general
development lake and which is also consistent with the size of other back lots In this immediate area.
(Break 7:15 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.)
Delvern S and Janice M Husfeldt - Denied. (7:30 p.m.)
Delvern S and Janice M Husfeldt, Lot 5 Block 1 Oak Shores Second Addition, Rush Lake in Rush Lake
Township, requested a variance of 6’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement
of a 32’ by 48’ structure 14’ from the road right-of-way. The audience was polled with no one speaking for
or against the variance as requested. A letter from Andrew Klinnert, Chairman of Rush Lake Township,
stating that the township had no objection with the variance as requested was read for the record. After
consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Joe Maske to approve a variance of 6’ from the
required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a 32’ by 48’ structure 14’ from the road right-
of-way. This motion failed with Cecil Femling and Randall Mann voting no and with Paul Larson and
Michael Harris abstaining. Those voting against the motion noted that there is no adequate hardship
unique to the property that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that the
applicants have adequate room on there property and could have placed the 32’ by 48’ structure in a
location which would not have required a variance from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’. It
was also noted that had this request been submitted before the project was completed it would have been
denied for the same reasons. After additional discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve
Schierer and unanimously carried, to allow the applicants 120 days to b@/!PteAtt8tctiK^ iptoieqtfnpliance
with the required road right-of-way setback.