The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About16000991053000_Variances_06-14-2007\ OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA 1 hereby certify th^ this instrument #22477 was filed/recorded in this office for record on the 10 dav of^ 2007 at^0O(^ Wendy L.^etcalf, County im er^0uty^ (Z fOpJf ^cor^ 'well certifi^te THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER, APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Received JUN [132007 land & RESOURCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website; www.co.ottertaiLmn.us Application Fee \ <415^.0COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number . Accepted By / Date •Pa-OI m aCQ , S'feXjp '? LOPfO Lpt\i^ DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS LAKE NUMBER LAKE CLASSLAKE NAME Pi^ietLa.s IS(pPL H /TOWNSHIP NAMETOWNSHIPRANGESECTION E-911 ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 160Dno PlOO I irxDO LEGAL DESCRIPTION /O ^ >IAji3Wy TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) TRS X Misc.Subdivision ClusterStructure Size Sewage SystemStructure Setback^ SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. ItJit? LoOfO Lo-iuic^ LCS-S i ^ ijJCxtlc^ coo pvxrj<-<^i'iovi I cua.^ Tb TRa_ LiUAUzl ouu^Ve^ h/tuc/ 6c/VVC(>s'fa “^iXDOO-tAAX i UNDERSTAND THAT i HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MAfHEtGEMENT REGARDING iFflB MATTER. cx SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) (/ Joo-7Date Of Hearing _Time } Motion Paul A. Pinke ^ Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:50 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1.) Point No. 1 as depicted on the drawing dated June 12, 2007 must be permanently attached to Lot 1, Pinke’s East Loon Lake Estates, 2.) Point No. 2 as depicted on the drawing dated June 12, 2007 must be permanently attached to Parcel 16-000-02-0011-008, 3.) the area contained in Points 1 and 2 cannot be used when calculating impervious surface coverage for back lot development and 4.) a register surveyor's drawing must be provided at the time of conveyance. Ch^man/Otter Tan County Board of Adjustment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) X No 7kin'?Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR LR Official/Date bk 0106-001 V. Lundeen 324855 OTC Parcel GISMO Output- NOT a Legal Document Otter Tail County Parcel GISMO ) / /ifinaaniDDDSD^'i / lfiDQDDlDQD4DDD N !E if%I£DbbSiab745DD&'^lEDBDSgn751DDC I LCtlrklll?S±llllt J c* O Llkkfellk^SShhk ^ •'* '*V-::f: o Ukkkllk7S4kkl 160 V* ?•■<iF & ‘ o FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY-Copyright (C) 2008 Otter Tail County, MN x-€- j" !Page 1 of 1 I iI i : I \IP t 5 \ VI \,\( 0330733000 LOT s ■Z : - "Meters July 5, 2007 Page # 3 Mark Kempf - Approved the variance as requested. (7:37 p.m.) Mark Kempf, Lots 6 and 7 Engstrom Beach 4*^ Addition, McDonald Lake in Edna Township, requested a variance to construct a mound system with 12” of separation instead of the required 24”. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Mike Lovelace represented the applicant at the public hearing. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Cal Zick and unanimously carried, to approve, based on information regarding the Minnesota Septic Requirement Rule 70/80 as provided by Kyle Westergard, a variance to construct a mound system with 12” of separation instead of the required 24". Minnesota Septic Requirement Rule 70/80 requires 12” of separation and the Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners are considering adopting Minnesota Septic Requirement Rule 70/80 in full. It was noted that the Land and Resource Department recommends mound systems over holding tanks. Paul A. Pinke - Approved the variance as requested with conditions. (7:50 p.m.) Paul A. Pinke, part of Government Lot 6 Section 2 of Dora Township by Loon Lake, requested the following; The lakeshore that I own consists of two projections into Loon Lake each being less than 1 acre. I would like to separate the two projections and sell them to the landowners across County Highway 35 from each. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from Jack Saari in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1.) Point No. 1 as depicted on the drawing dated June 12, 2007 must be permanently attached to Lot 1, Pinke’s East Loon Lake Estates, 2.) Point No. 2 as depicted on the drawing dated June 12, 2007 must be permanently attached to Parcel 16- 000-02-0011-008, 3.) the area contained in Points 1 and 2 cannot be used when calculating impervious surface coverage for back lot development and 4.) a register surveyor’s drawing must be provided at the time of conveyance. Patrick E. Foley - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (8:02 p.m.) Patrick E. Foley, Lot 32 Birchwood Shores, Pickerel Lake in Maine Township, requested a variance of 15’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of an 1T by 16’ addition 85’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 15’ form the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of an IT by 16’ addition 85’ from the ordinary high water level with the condition that no more than 25% of the total lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. It was noted that the proposed development does not obstruct view from the adjacent property, is on the backside of the existing dwelling away from the lake and does not require a side lot line variance. Marty Hanson - Denied. (8:08 p.m.) Marty Hanson, part of Government Lot 2 Section 33 of Lida Township by South Lake Lida, requested the following: I owned Lot 5 which has a house, well and septic system. Approximately two years ago I purchased the adjacent Lots 3 and 4 which contained a trailer and sewer system. I sold Lot 5; however, prior to the transfer being recorded I removed the trailer from the other lots. This combined the three lots as one. I am requesting a variance to split and sell Lot 5 separate from Lots 3 and 4. The audience was polled with Yvonne Schlichting speaking about the common lot line between Lots 5 and 6. After discussion and consideration, Michael Harris made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested. Granting the variance as requested would establish precedence that the Board of Adjustment does not wish to establish.