Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16000990657000_Variances_06-02-20111093145 DOC# 1093145 1093145 Fee: $46.00 Well Certificate [ ] Rec'd OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified. Filed, and/or Recorded June 09, 2011 10:45 AM Wendy L. Metcalf, Recorder Returned To: LAND & RESOURCE By. NDB THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number Accepted By / Date 4^// PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE ro(93MAILING ADDRESS ___LAKE CLASS ______________ BiCp ~ 38^LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME IM HISECTIONTOWNSHIP ; 6C00O9SO OSrS'Ooo y 0 OQCC O3')O0O RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME H 2a'>s ^PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lo\-s> }0^/f Meyers Sccor^d TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback X Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. /^ (/o,r/oAcf '-Prc/v? 'A'c ^ uUl 4c* ^ I'fbjs 0^ ,'s 3o encf'octcln toe 0"^/o' I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. S-/2-// SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER /(AGENT FOR OWNE DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 7 /^/n^ 6^0/)Date Of Hearing TimeUMUi. 0 Motion Mike and Mona Johnson - Denied. (7:45 p, m.) After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and carried with Thomas Lee voting no, to deny the variance as requested noting that the previously approved variance does provide the applicants with a reasonable use their property and the neighbor has indicated in a conversation with Randall Mann, Chair, stating that with the previously approve variance he would still have access to his property/garage. The general opinion of the Board is that the previously approved variance was thought to be the most reasonable location/site for the placement of a single stall garage. It was also noted that not every property will support everything a property owner might desire. Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No L R Official/Date Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota June 2,2011 Page # 4 Brian and Debora Brakke - Approved the variance as requested. (7:42 p.m.) Brian and Debora Brakke, Lot 21 Block 4 Lida Shores, Lake Lida in Lida Township, requested the following: We would like to change the pitch of the existing roofline from 4/12 pitch to 12/12 pitch, while replacing worn/old shingles and rotten roof boards. We are requesting a variance for existing cabin, being 36’ from the ordinary high water level, placing the cabin in shore impact zone; required ordinary high water level setback is 75’ and the required shore impact zone setback is 50’. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried to approve the variance as described in the application dated May 12, 2011 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the application. The variance as approved allows the applicants to change the roof line on the existing footprint of the building (house). There will be no change to the existing footprint and the proposed development will not negawely impact the neighboring properties. ;e and Mona Johnson - Denied. (7:45 p, m.) Mike and Mona Johnson, Lots 10 and 11 Meyers Second Addition, West McDonald Lake in Dora Township, requested a variance of 10’ from the required top of bluff setback of 30’ for the placement of a garage 20’ from the top of the bluff. Proposed garage will encroach the toe of bluff by approximately 10’. The applicants were represented by Rob with Moore Engineering, Inc. and by Greg Nelson with Superior Lakeside. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and carried with Thomas Lee voting no, to deny the variance as requested noting that the previously approved variance does provide the applicants with a reasonable use their property and the neighbor has indicated in a conversation with Randall Mann, Chair, stating that with the previously approve variance he would still have access to his property/garage. The general opinion of the Board is that the previously approved variance was thought to be the most reasonable location/site for the placement of a single stall garage. It was also noted that not every property will support everything a property owner might desire. Darwyn and Wendy Smith - Approved a variance from the ordinary high water level and denied the side lot line variances as requested with a condition. (8:02 p.m.) Darwyn and Wendy Smith, Lot 36 Robinson’s Addition, Clitherall Lake in Nidaros Township, requested a variance of 30’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and variance of 3’ and 6’ from the required lot line setback of 10’ for the placement of year round structure 70’ from the ordinary high water level, 7’ from the side lot line on the southwest corner and 4’ from the side lot line on the northeast corner. A letter from Ruby Biederman opposing the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to approve the placement of a dwelling no closer to the ordinary high water level than the dwelling to the east and to deny the side lot line setback variances as requested with the condition that the shed currently located down by the lake and on the lot line must be placed in a location, as verbally agreed to by the applicant, in a location that complies with the setback requirement of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. The applicants’ property is a substandard lot of record. Note - the applicant can either remove and relocated the shed or remove and replace with a new shed so long as the setback requirements of the ordinance are met. Tom and Irene Yaeck - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (8:14 p.m.) Tom and Irene Yaeck, Lot 9 Sandy Haven Development, Stalker Lake in Tordenskjold Township, requested a variance of 8’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a 30’ by 36’ detached garage 12’ from the road right-of-way. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 8’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a 30’ by 36’ detached garage 12’ from the road right-of-way with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area can be covered with impervious surfaces. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development.