The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About16000990629000_Variances_02-06-2001Pre-Application Site Inspection Request NOTE: Onsite Inspections will be done between April & October unless the Land & Resource Administrator determines current weather conditions are suitable for onsite inspections.Assigned To/Date: Section Twp NameLake/River ClassLake / River No.Lake / River Name Property (E-911) AddressParcel(s) No. __ I Property Owner lnformation;^g^^j^' I Wv\'- V\e.Name(s): \\c;^\\ f^n'tr ManKnVV _______________________ Daytime Phone: 'Zr?\ ~ IC^VliC) u"iCa>^K Address: VO- Type of Request: Bluff: Date Stamp ^ Stake Setback^ Stake Setback _ Shore Impact Zone:___ Verify SetbackDetermination RECEIVED JUL 0 1 2013 LAND & RESOURCE OHWL:Verify SetbackDetermination Building Line:stake SetbackVerification Shoreland Area:Wetland:DeterminationDetermination Soils:Restrictive Layer Determination / Vertical Separation L&R Initial loo Je'\k>&ck. •*' S-folCjj, lolu,^ ‘/-f Uu-N"Describe Request: A scale drawing must accompany Pre-Application Site Inspection Request & request must be staked onsite Owner JL o L DatePrope INSPECTION COMPLETED (Inspection must be done within 10 days of receipt): ■gy t7-to-)3 *1 - lO' 13 InspectorDate Property Owner NotifiedDate Onsite 4Receipt Number:Fee: SOWNEDInspector must provide site drawing or field notes on other side. mbowman Application & Forms Pre-Application Site Insp Request Form 06/2012 . ^ r . .*» •"7-/(0'/3 t * .* •t - ^ f 4 ••#i » ...» •»» I •• •*• .•' ■ 'loo' -f; (^) S+aki^ ~~OQ /• •OHu)Uf O |rv\ t «l< r •■V• • . • . •«• / •* » *■ ■ •\ ..v' i ,f •r*t '4 * 4 •«4 44A4 v.*«? . '/if'h:. ■-{ ' i * j ^ 4 -roB 0 ‘ ^ ..\A 0-JCo'Jbte El■ - .. \- ss?rr,.'SN"as“"“"I hereby certify that this instrument #_ ^ was filed/recorded in this office nthe 12 879484 for Wenb^. Mete by: nunn —^ -bay of __—2001 L_OOj3iX^^^ /y..recording fee .well certificate Lit THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739-2271 COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK***/bC'Application Fee / 35 73 /Receipt Number C?g,) 2^7-PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE i*7/^ i/Jii'AbC ^ MoojifjCS) ^ADDRESS f M.A - f53LAKE NUMBER LAKE NAME LAKE CLASS oA MAo'ifSECTION. TOWNSHIP f(s OOP 99of) A7000 RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME PARCEL NUMBER FIRE/LAKE I.D. NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION SMQ) Cor5 4^'f ■ TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback X Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision____ Cluster Misc. SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTED Dia-to-fU bYOi^o-i-tim of our lcH-,n)e gji nc+ able Td place a SiriuiMC lOitViuvTlui ^deUritS, .3fcf utp OflkArtir. |/j£ oee U-Siiinq, Uoic To ksJfOWUWL -m-i^ hard^luf OJt MoJut BZ M m-tuivn of oir 10+. u)rte*Ju c.uj;rav-f liuoi, u)e baut -fcpiaet -fKii iwiit Wwjl 3c-f«e+ 4m -pu. b\u.-ff and 2e> -ped- 4vo»yi -fl«- edait re|iurd<vieMS. ibe cul for a. vdvKuut of \5 fccA -Or^rn. -+lut ^ -Uul ^'OGuAAv fldct d ^ tXla BOi/ra IvL-Sview)^ cuur oi U^hOre. CLMi^\Aa tdJ\^ C6LUd ^^0\(Uec\ . tOill b£ O^plLW/ia -&V-(Ta 0£/rvC.^ Ff -\nL vtii'itiUAc^'^aXlmudL ^ 6 d u.^ I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. ^/cA/t-SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER DATE £DAPPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)FEB - 9 2G01 LAND & RESOURCE ^>07lAj / ^ -^VZ) 3 -a-a jAApril 5, 2001 Page 6 ik^/c ~^7j0yrwTd-j'/ ^ t/ctLdJ Csf 02(^be^iL^'J (d-oL^ I'dA U2 O Accepted By Land & Resource L & R Official/Date 'J' J’oJ"TimeDate Of Hearing Motion Greg and Pam Krier - Denied. Motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested noting that it is quite possible that this is a non-buildable lot or a lot suitable only for short term camper use. The Board also acknowledged the concern expressed by the Dora Town Board of Supervisors as a reason by denying the variance as requested. The applicants were also informed that should a bluff not affect their property they could submit a new application for consideration without the payment of a fee. Olbafrmarl il County Board of Adjustment !Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No i iCopy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNRi I- R Official/Date bk 0198-001 291.306 • Victor Lundeen Co.. Pfinter8 • Fergus Fells. Minnesota t^^pril 5/2001^ Michael R. and Tracy A. Boldt - Approved Michael R. and Tracy A. Boldt^razee, MN, requested a variance of 20’ from the requir^cHfrdinary high water level setback of 100’ for the pur^s|e of attaching an existing guest home and porpM^me main dwelling and for the purpose of adding a seconoTto^ being no closer to the ordinary hi^b-wSler level than the existing guest house, which is approximately 80''ifQm the ordinary high The property is described as Lots 21, 22, 23, and 24, Wymer Lake Resort, Wy?n«cLake inJHpbenfT^nship. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After dj5bfet«|fonand consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by Rod Boyer and_unafHmtfusly carrie^f>tQapprove a variance of 20’ from the required ordinary high waterJ^^el-setbaCirof 100’ for the purpose ofaftaoNng an existing guest home and porch to the [he purpose of adding a second floor whicnMl^ no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing guest house which is approximately 80’ from thetffdinary high water level. It was noted that the proposed development will be no closer to the lake than the existing structures and the applicants' proposal will bring an illegal situation into compliance with the ordinance by creating a single dwelling. mai Greg and Pam Krier- Denied. ^reg-and Pam Krier, Moorhead, MN, requested the following; “Due to the proportion of our lot, we are not able to place a structure within the guidelines, set up by the County. We are asking you to help us overcome this hardship. We have 82 feet on the top of our lot. With the current laws we have to place the mobile home 30 feet from the bluff and 20 feet from the road requirements. We are asking for a variance of 15 feet from the centerline of the road to place a mobile home on our lot." From the applicants’ drawing it appears that the proposed 14’ by 70’ mobile home, at its nearest point, will be 18’ from the back property line and 30’ from the centerline of the road. The property is described as Lots 49 and 50, Oak Manor Shores, Loon Lake in Dora Township. A letter from the Dora Town Board of Supervisors opposing the applicants’ request was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested noting that it is quite possible that this is a non-buildable lot or a lot suitable only for short term camper use. The Board also acknowledged the concern expressed by the Dora Town Board of Supervisors as a reason by denying the variance as requested. The applicants were also informed that should a bluff not affect their property they could submit a new application for consideration without the payment of a fee. Roger and Elaine Wilde - Denied dorhead, MN, requested a variance of 46!>dm the required ordinary high water Licomthe requiredjjdertbfiine setback of 10’ for the placement of 1,296 square foot proposed dwelling 54’ fronvtReiDr^joaiJ^gh water level and 6’ from both side lot lines. The property is described as Lot K, Poss Survey Lpts-'dfGovetTTfftenLJ^t 7, Section 31 of Dunn Township by Lake Lizzie. The audience was polled with ngjon^speaking for or agair^^tbe request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by "Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Fetdfing and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested as no adequate hardship unique to the ap^ants’ property had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as requested and noting that their appears to be another alternative available which would not require the granting of a variance. Roger and Elaine Wr level setback of 100’ and a variai jnch(es) equals feetScale: _i .grid(s) equals feet, or ■ ED -■B - 9 2001 Please use this sheet for the required scale drawing of your proposal. Be sure to include lot dimension, water frontage, and setbacks from RW, lake, lot lines, sewage system, top of bluff, existing structures and all imper vious surface. Required impervious surface coverage calculation (See definition in Shoreland Management Ordinance) / ) '77 Total Impervious Surface Onsite y3??0 %x100 = Total Lot Area (FT2)i (FT2) OfiouL - ^ 3 1 ............ iii / uio^5 i %0/- 6uurf = N N 1III'i/\I -i'>, X / - - I 1/Af i(■•'C i CO /V VJ of- Signature Dated BK —0500 — 029 300.816 ■ Victor Lundeen Co. Printers * Fergus Falls. MN • 1-800-346-4870