The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About16000990461000_Variances_06-02-2011' I IIDOC# 1093141 !i!l10931411093141 Fee: $46.00 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified, Filed, and/or Recorded June 09, 2011 10:45 AM Wendy L. Metcalf, Recorder Well Certificate [ ] Rec'd Returned To' LAND & RESOURCE By: NDB THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us ^ 00Application Fee Receipt Number / ^ ^ ^ f<j/)i COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Accepted By / Date DAYTIME PHONE 7di- ^5 friigo K^D ifef j p)K7>lAj' /] TOWNSHIP NAME ______________________ E-911 _ADDRESSni3V^^ 'TharT^ PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS LAKE NUMBER \ / LAKE CLASSLAKE NAME TOWNSHIP / RANGE V/SECTION PARCEL , , ^ ^ .NUMBER / ijCV(XT^0‘^hU>!OOP LEGAL DESCRIPTION Bio(:7< / of Orys-htri! M. C f €. UdT3 ^ \ i bZ- , on TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) structure Setback ^ Structure Size____Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. replace p^-’rch UJUU be 3^ froryy f7\cC>oyiti/q 0U)n Ln pKf-SFT cipproy'^^r^ variance, weire^ ch<rorr^<r^ duet -w mn^drsurunci SfhcuLhj becausr^ of ^nevo Oerver. ‘of ^ dt> replace^ holdtinj -htnk. \Ajbth ■frc^/Yi f^VenaU, 2S'-frcn^ BoovOh. ir fronn .^fruciure^ iiCgrTAn/iiS^ /7<e<.<j holcLincjd^yik. Bd I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. ^//ol u bATESIGNATURERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) fi.r- i3 PmQo / J.1Date Of Hearing TimeUjtmjL r Motion Andy and Leanne Magnotto - Approved the variance as requested and as modified. (7:13 p.m.) After discussion and consideration, Thomas Lee made a motion, second by Steve Schiererand unanimously carried, to approve the variances necessary for the replacement of an existing 16’ by 10’ deck with a 14’ by 16’ screened porch, which will be 30’ from West McDonald Lake, 22’ from Brown Lake and 12’ from the road right-of-way and to approve the replacement of the existing holding tank with a new holding tank in the most compliant location possible as determined by the Land and Resource Department, which means if the existing shed is more than 10’ from the lot line and, if necessary to facilitate/accommodate the placement of a septic/holding tank, the existing shed can be moved to a location which is 10’ from the lot line. The septic/holding tank must be placed at least 10’ from the structures. I I County"Board of Adjilstment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR bk 0407-001 329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company Fergus Falls, Minnesota June 2,2011 Page # 3 and Leanne Magnbtto - Approved the variance as requested and as modified. (7:13 p.m.) Andy and Leanne Magnotto, Lots 51 and 52 Block 1 of Crystal Beach, West McDonald Lake in Dora Township, requested the following: Requesting to replace existing 16’ by 10’ deck with 14’ by 16’ screened porch. Structure will be 30’ from West McDonald and 22’ from Brown Lake. Measurements in past approved variance were incorrect due to measuring difficulty because of snow cover. Structure will be 12’ from right-of-way. Requesting to replace existing holding tank with a new holding tank 30’ from west McDonald, 25’ from Brown and 6’ from existing shed. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested.' After discussion and consideration, Thomas Lee made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve the variances necessary for the replacement of an existing 16’ by 10’ deck with a 14’ by 16’ screened porch, which will be 30’ from West McDonald Lake, 22’ from Brown Lake and 12’ from the road right-of-way and to approve the replacement of the existing holding tank with a new holding tank in the most compliant location possible as determined by the Land and Resource Department, which means if the existing shed is more than 10’ from the lot line and, if necessary to facilitate/accommodate the placement of a septic/holding tank, the existing shed can be moved to a location which is 10’ from the lot line. The septic/holding tank must be placed at least 10’ from the structures. Break - 7:20 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Beverly Blair-Approved the variance as requested. (7:30 p.m.) Beverly Blair, part of Government Lots 1 and 6, Section 13 of Aurdal Township by an unnamed lake, requested a . variance of 29’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the placement of a 30’ by 48’ dwelling 171’ from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 48’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for a 32’ by 40’ addition onto an existing shed located 152’ from the ordinary high water level. Tony Koep appeared with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Thomas Larson and unanimously carried, to.approve a variance of 29’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the placement of a 30’ by 48’ dwelling 17T from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 48’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for a 32’ by 40’ addition onto an existing shed located 152’ from the ordinary high water level. The proposed development (location and size) will not negatively impact the neighboring properties, The terrain features are the applicant’s practical difficulty. It was also noted the lake was recently reclassified from a general development lake to a natural environment lake. V Fred Bauck and Mary Cooper Bauck - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (7:35 p.m.) . Fred Bauck and Mary Cooper Bauck, Lot 26'Plainview Sandy Beach and Lot 13 Block 1 Plainview Sandy Beach third Addition, Kerbs Lake in Edna Township, requested a variance of 125’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ and a variance of 10’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a dwelling and attached garage, in a 50’ by 60’ rectangle 75’ from the ordinary high water level and 10’ from the road right-of-way. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. A letter from the Little McDonald, Kerbs and Paul Lake Improvement District in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made.a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 125’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ and a variance of 10’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a dwelling and attached garage, in a 50’ by 60’ rectangle 75’ from the ordinary high water level and 10’ from the road right-of-way with the condition that before any permits for the proposed development.can be issued Lots 26 and 27 Plainview Sandy Beach'(Parcel Nos. 20-000-99-0361-000 and 20-000-99-0362-000) and Lot 13 Block 1 Plainview Sandy Beach Third Addition (Parcel; No. 20-000-99-0773-000);must have the same recorded ownership. The variances as approved do not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development or for any future development. i c/6 fOOO1(^000^90 Z 3 v-s:3 U^6-ST •, r.^Ul'1 5^IC 4-f o I -1(V\ i I MI/\!'\\\311-^i I li V '1bfS,)\2LvjI■ CT\ (?>|f? ■!<,1-I -K.ro 1I \r t 1; \i ;_ :;\1 fi; 1' "V—-i>\ iV■'i '1\m€\;i .Y-i 15\1 CPiI \:?2 ^ u\ --t>r, ™ i'lt'' ^I?I h\I •:4i\!5'';--f-\ ^V\-1^%- “i - "5* <3 El i\\ I <! IA- - VO ------r — - -5 •<>- X%xR\_l\3 ;"W ;'I r\' i 1/I;4^]II m& I ’ C-sn_1L o /Q ' n.1'H/» ■S± ^' \i\!r ' <^ir\ "1fi/.[’ ^iiI ♦- lit . ^ V- i1ctin'f.^"'\i <j "O l^-l ;7^^ 2,=5^% T I? \J I t'! I I I I'MM.!2:>ifImiIe'j I j/57/0',// CURRENT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: house - 560 sq.ft deck - 264 sq.ft sidewalk - 54 sq.ft shed - 96 sq.ft TOTAL = 978 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: house - 560 sq. ft front & side stoop - 3^sq. ft screen porch - 224 sq. ft shed - 96 sq ft TOTAL = &HSQUARE FEET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REDUCED BY 66 SQUARE FEET TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY = 7125 SQ. FT CURRENT AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 13.7% PROPOSED AMONUT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 12.8% 1 ■ f