Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16000990343000_Variances_08-04-2011DOC# 1097008 1097008 1097008 Fee: $46.00 Well Certificate [ ] Rec'd OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified, Filed, and/or Recorded: September 07, 2011 9:45 AM Wendy L. Metcalf, Recorder Returned To: LAND & RESOURCE By: NDB THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us 9HDO- doApplication Fee Receipt Number /IH !o7COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Accepted By / Date Hooe<l'v50Vl DAYTIME PHONE(7oi ^7-3Q -^H ll (ce//PROPERTY OWNER \AJ,' U >arY^ L) • ^ 5 irt ^l0 3i 3 2'^^ sr.S.. \A/gst' Si)(cni' L <xKg, O 5 S / Cj HMAILING ADDRESS £l Si 9 PvDLAKE NUMBER SECTION 3 I LAKE NAME TOWNSHIP i 3 fc RANGE O ¥ / TOWNSHIP NAME D O f Q LAKE CLASS PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS 4 0 2.19 5;L«-tAcr« 910ooo^‘?o3‘<3oo'nq D :3VXo ArtIcoo Silent Acrrs L o t 3 ■»- Tit 6 ET lk * LoT tbt 7. LEGAL DESCRIPTION TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback Structure Size___Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. } * OO / Co H NAJ i_ ^ / Tkc rc<*C'VA./ V e x/Cl V l CL p C ^ 14 L ik bo ku-ilcjf-tvo 0iT(A / m or^ V ^I n cJ c fv b i n s j t 5C.cL.\o 1*0 , .bjc»T 9 f«j_b -C O /4 v\> u cii (o e b- «<b“. ^ "Fo ^ > It f'*^ gy., 54 ) F* c, t <j* i», Cl bc*<Ak, loWicA. jp*-tCa'^'/OU. s I Aeftr c ~ocul(^L r^placg_ tkc FoVcb»\. rc^ofiL u.j]4L g I Steffi 0*7 a<-*J drg ip b < c-1 g v-\/c- t*A_£c V/<?. i O-w C. ^ (•■•(L A./0 ( <Vt ■C.'i. .T, +Fie <i lb 7og b VA.^ c fc iil*. f k e be-cAF tkft ietiotxcl^ ob tAevjicvAc\ib(e*-s-Cv' 36'j ro- re i,nrv Tb*.ev/'e A yO rc ^C- Cu(> p . 5 C b VA/' e CA pp , ^0.4 « 1 V 7 4’ < T »*t V"V^ O A L\/ F| . ^ uC/ I C-i t~ W ' £.) ri» {^1^ > ve I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. i-m-nSIGNATURE OF PhOPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) f / y <^0/!Date Of Hearing Time Motion William D and Sharon R Hoverson - Approved the revised plan with conditions. (7:45 p.m.) August 4“’, 2011 meeting - The applicants’ contractor appeared with the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to table, with the applicants verbal permission, this public hearing until the September 1, 2011 Board of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicants time to consider other development alternatives that either do not require the granting of any variances or required less variance than what is being requested. September 1, 2011 meeting - William and Sharon Hoverson presented a revised plan for consideration by the Board of Adjustment. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, seconded by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 30’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the proposed development as described in the revised plan and drawing Silent Acres must b^-l^ which will be copv^ed September 1, 2011 with the following conditions: 1.) the existing holding tank located on Lot 3 gally^andoned apd^.) there carHSeTio plutrfoing (sewer/water) services connected to the existing cabin, nonresideoHaUise. ( J ChairrtTan/C5tferTaifuounty Board of'Adjustmenf Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 0407-001 329.512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls. Minnesota August 4, 2011 Page # 4 flliam D and Sharon R Hoverson - Tabled. (8:17 p.m.) William D and Sharon R Hoverson, Lots 2 and 3 Silent Acres, West Silent Lake in Dora Township, requested the following: We request a variance of 72’ from the required 100' setback from the ordinary high water level in order to build a two-story 24’ by 28’ addition to our existing cabin. The existing cabin sits 19’ from the ordinary high water level. We propose to site the front of the new addition 9’ back from the front of the existing cabin. Therefore the setback of the new addition from ordinary high water level would be 28’. We further propose to abandon and fill the existing holding tank, which is precariously near ordinary high water level (approximately 30’). We would replace the holding tank with a lift station and drain field approximately 75' from ordinary high water level. We also seek a variance of 40’ from the required 150’ lot width for lakes now classified “RD”. (When we purchased the property in 1989, West Silent Lake was classified General Development - “GD”.) The applicants’ contractor appeared with the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to table, with the applicants verbal permission, this public hearing until the September 1,2011 Board of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicants time to consider other development alternatives that either do not require the granting of any variances or required less variance than what is being requested. Jeffrey and Barb Grunewald - Application approved as modified. (8:10 p.m.) Jeffrey and Barb Grunewald, Lot 1 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 Silent Haven, West Silent Lake in Dora Township, requested the following: We would like to split our front lot from our back lot, both being larger lots with separate septics and wells. Due to loss of jobs, we need to sell our lake home, and reduce debt. We would retain our back lot, but would not request additional building permits. Road separates these lots. Currently we have one lake lot with 200’ water front and 54,800 square feet of area which is permanently attached to a back lot (separated by dedicated township road) with 160' of width and 42,500 square feet of area. Propose to have lake lot considered buildable for residential purpose, and have back lot considered restrictive residential for current owner only. The minimum size for a platted lake lot is 150’ of frontage and 40,000 square feet of area and for platted back lots the minimum size is 300’ of width and 80,000 square feet of area. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion to approve the variance as requested with the condition that the back lot would only be buildable for nonresidential structures. After additional discussion and consideration this motion was withdrawn and Randall Mann made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee to approve the variance as requested. After additional discussion and consideration this motion was also withdrawn. Steve Schierer then made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and carried with Randall Mann and Paul Larson voting no, to approve the separation of Lot 1 Block 1 from Lot 1 Block 2 and to declare the front/lake lot buildable for residential purposes and to declared the back lot buildable for nonresidential purposes. Thomas and Jayne Piehl - No Action Thomas and Jayne Piehl, Lot 2 Block 1 Big Pine Haven, Big Pine Lake in Pine Lake Township, requested the following: need more room for drain field either setback from - Option 1 - Lot Line 5 feet, Option 2 - Dwelling 17 feet or Option 3 - Bluff 5 feet July 7, 2011 meeting - The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to table with the verbal agreement of the applicant this public hearing until the September 1, 2011 meeting of the Board of Adjustment, which will provide the applicants with adequate time to obtain the distance between the proposed drain field and the neighbor’s dwelling and with an opportunity to obtain a letter of support from the neighbor. August 4, 2011 meeting - No action taken as the applicants had requested at the July 7, 2011 meeting to have their hearing tabled until the September 1, 2011 meeting. September 1,2011 Page # 3 Martin and Sandra Friedrich - Continued After consideration and discussion, Ken Erickson made a motion, seconded by Michael Harris to deny the variances as requested. This motion was withdrawn. After additional discussion and consideration, Ken Erickson made a motion, seconded by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve the variances as requested for replacement of an existing 1000 gallon sealed septic tank with two 2000 gallon sealed septic tanks and to deny all other variances as requested noting the number of variances necessary for the development as proposed and expressing concern with the amount of impervious surface coverage. Future Generations LLC - Approved the application as requested. (7:32 p.m.) Future Generations LLC, Lot 2 Block 2 Palms of Lida First Addition, Lake Lida in Lida Township, requested the following: Variance from the subdivision controls ordinance, to allow Chiovaro's to purchase, without platting, that portion of Lot 2 Block 2 depicted on the certificate of survey. The Chiovaro’s own adjacent and contiguous property to the east which is currently being used as the driveway and yard. Future Generations LLC proposed to complete the transfer to Chiovaro’s without platting, and as a substandard lot would be permanently joined with a part of Chiovaro's property. Existing south driveway easement will be vacated. Bruce Qvammen represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to approve the proposed subdivision as depicted on the Certificate of Survey filed with the variance application dated August 9, 2011. Larry C Madson and Laurel Mahan - Approve the application as requested with conditions. (7:38 p.m.) Larry C Madson and Laurel Mahan, part of Government Lot 4, Section 22 of Hobart Township by Rose Lake, requested the following: 1.) Variance from Subdivision Control Ordinance to be allowed to sell approximately 75’ by 150’ lot with 30’ by 48’ garage to be attached to Lot 10, Rose Lake Beach Wylie’s Addition and 2.) Approximately 130’ by 150’ lot to be attached to existing adjacent Tract A. Larry Madson and Corey Nyhus represented the application at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve the proposed subdivisions, as depicted on the sketch presented at the public hearing, for nonresidential development with the following conditions: 1) that the area within Tract C cannot be used when calculating impervious surface coverage for Lot 10 of Rose Lake Beach Wylie’s Addition, 2) that Tract B must be permanently attached to Tract A and 3) a registered surveyor’s drawing must be presented at the time of conveyance. Tracts "A”, “B” and “C” are identified on the sketch prepared by Meadowland Surveying Inc., D and Sharon R Hoverson - Approved the revised plan with conditions. (7:45 p.m.) William D and Sharon R Hoverson, Lots 2 and 3 Silent Acres, West Silent Lake in Dora Township, requested the following: We request a variance of 72’ from the required 100’ setback from the ordinary high water level in order to build a two-story 24’ by 28’ addition to our existing cabin. The existing cabin sits 19’ from the ordinary high water level. We propose to site the front of the new addition 9' back from the front of the existing cabin. Therefore the setback of the new addition from ordinary high water level would be 28’. We further propose to abandon and fill the existing holding tank, which is precariously near ordinary high water level (approximately 30’). We would replace the holding tank with a lift station and drain field approximately 75’ from ordinary high water level. We also seek a variance of 40’ from the required 150’ lot width for lakes now classified “RD”. (When we purchased the property in 1989, West Silent Lake was classified General Development - “GD”.) August 4‘”, 2011 meeting - The applicants’ contractor appeared with the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to table, with the applicants verbal permission, this public hearing until the September 1, 2011 Board of Adjustment meeting to allow the applicants time to consider other development alternatives that either do not require the granting of any variances or required less variance than what is being requested. September 1, 2011 meeting - Wiliam and Sharon Hoverson presented a revised plan for consideration by the Board of Adjustment. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, seconded by Michael Harris and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 30’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the proposed development as described in the revised plan and drawing dated September 1, 2011 with the following conditions: 1.) the existing holding tank located on Lot 3 Silent Acres must be legally abandoned and 2.) there can be no plumbing (sewer/water) services connected to the existing cabin, which will be converted to a nonresidential use. I REVISED APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE William D. and Sharon R. Hoverson 4031 32°^^ St. S. Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 730-5471 (cell) (701) 293-6724 (home) Lake Number: 519 Lake Name: West Silent Lake Lake Class: RD Section: M Township: 136 Range: 041 Township Name: Dora Parcel Number 16000990343000 E-911 Address: 40228 Silent Acres Rd. Legal Description Silent Acres Lots 2 & 3 & TR BET LK & LOT Type of Variance Requested: Structure Setback Specify how your project varies from ordinance requirements: We are revising our original variance request to build a new 30 X 32 Two Story structure with a 12 X 16 attached screened porch approximately 70 feet from the OHWL. At the board’s suggestion, we are proposing to build the new structure on the hill above and behind the existing cabin. Our intention is to convert the old cabin to a shed (as recommended by the Board at the meeting). The new structure would include an attached screened porch (12’ X 16’). And, we would install a new 1,500 gallon holding tank and drainfield behind the new structure. We anticipate beginning site preparation in early September, 2011. Requested: A 30 foot variance from the required 100 foot setback from OHWL. Thank you for your consideration, William D. and Sharon R. Hoverson September 1, 2011 i itSCALE DRAWING FORM f )Lor>r, 2vod Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface calculations. H. ^ Inn' A\5'%Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete tWorksheet On Other Side) t ;L,... ^ I -r \'i WILUkH 5HARn>i) ft. tfDt.>£.iR30Ni ' -2\ fwp -1*36 f-oirae- 't>^\ : A U/tij Acres I :L. !TR BcT, L < tf- LoT?■ :x:!:■t ■{....[■r I ■i -!;•I ;... 1 - i ; ■ ^ ■ r • t-...........I * e ^ t t-T tCulv'tfvX '—^■ \1.... *siufctsiT heats I ■ ......XLoT 3 ..I ;t t' : n ""t 't tr : , 0 fOtro ■A •T-'.X # rI1>>: ' !'A,y V «±dI ft A♦► iZ \A.!"■K’ e-vv) I Horn e, L-h--iit 3o^ V*|( IJKI^ _1K-* T <-f • -t ... 3^'I eI-t riS'^in jX ^'1I t' X /> - -VrAm .—------r / ( :-i ; t wC oXtV’la; f f* .• ■ i -!;1i /<■y-ii ■p4('/Oifto JP c'l ^-1 r A 7d', i„..i4./i 4 ri T ao' r%K' -ZI23$EZ:5 4 r -- ‘ -*-'7 -+5+c‘^e s ....t .f .i—s'.:'<iJ ti Jl. -. ....^ .•*-.■* 'J-r*.- ;-f, .vr vu,'- OHWU I * ■4F^- .//o -!■ to*' XLc^3 ■ ■t--j -------------rI.[...: .i'i•f s'f'i.::s4 •i-. ■ 1.....t i.!■ i‘....^...r i" -*•'—" ; .. i "i.I..M- .1 f-('-i + ■t !- U Hoq:llDatetiSignature of Propafty Owner 4 7BK —0909 j...I ($3asd6 • Victo LundMn Co. Primers » Persus faUs. UN * t-:8a0'34&4820 :■r..f. j1!; > IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALGULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): (V e w •S1 V lA <*4 u C^ec-K t *i 3-f Teo ISW&d ShsA HBO 9la 3^0 Ft2Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s): Q i h 0>^ I u3 A aS'o F+^1 C laV 1^0 0Driveway(s):■rl I " 0-Ft2Patio(s): 6 Ft2Sidewalk(s): ~ O Ft2Stairway(s): Q Ft2Retaining Wall(s): 1^0 Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 ^ Ft2 V^'. /5'0 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: io-\ y R2 22,0b"0 i3,)00LOT AREA:7 /I TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ■ 11 6X 100 =% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREA !I:4-J- ..J SCAtE DRAWING FORM •t1 r3 z JLnOn 99n3H 3qdQ Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface calculations. /V. £ t/I %Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) i ■JZEIIIT!,1 :±f:t 1 I.i1 1 ! t !]1 1 '■"i j_Liir:—r !T !t L—'IlIjTli1i.i.^_L J-T I!W{ LL lA H tjiS i .4" L oil' Ii 1.L_i '-3 \imiIr!+■ti T 1 .'_1 ' L!^Ti: i I ■ j..!+I !I'i.r-!'-t-J.T i.tT'..f.i'■j LlAJ.I i 1 ,1i.I j i I !1 1!I I !ni T!IT‘i T j ! i j i ;TTtT T i1 .L.1 I ii,LJ-t!IrrpiTTT:!I i f . I i I f I !f n;i r -I-1 :! :J__Q■rJ.I : I I‘Ti-+1 : !4-i i.TU2 _U_4_LiT ' 'T:!! 'MJ—LZl • ;• -| « ,,______ , '--"I—!......r.. ~ J----.....f ) f- .......................-t ;jf:riX -k_i ■ \ I 11 i .LU,:-t:UpT^i'BLOT5 1 1Xi i i ! r i“I IS T , , , \ _ft'eici —---.......... v-r ■0- I ■\ \r'"t r-f‘ t !.'i ■■ ' O;- ,I _,J^;iT Xi.^4 i_Gi -+-r .:,^r-rr-i.u J(ferfie !I.1.i.k_3d'-^"rtT"r t 1 JT "I ■ ■ 1 1-as^aifknpmit-■■\----------------------------”1 <-I V, •T : : - ILL.i. i-L-: I! u..5r . 1 ■| r..•Jfyrf.:..f-_ J •t;j.A 1 I I ■ ^ ^ ^ ~j 34Xiitti_4::L.{:.L;:' '.i n:-|:!1\l>'i in 1I U' C p te 1 f4fM-IX/ > ■ <.^■ WTU.|‘ :f :urm4.-V-!Xj _1...................________1--'. __Ij m ! ; I ■ • 4 "j :!I ®1'rtpiTMtJ-X f.,'...!14-I rtixi i-11 :t.-1 jJiri.itsaiiti nr J.• -w-.f't Hr', m .--J.n Lt±I xLa44nXi_Lig 1 ‘ : 1 . I • ';I IIi ;xx[4x' o ^ •*.^zrt 4i|ixj':r'; 4"‘; .4 il ii4i4ii4Tt; =±4Cx-L: |. i I i I iiwi Iij"'lhfexw/hVf r; 4.4..i.TVlX i :i ^ ' i ; I fcj»iiXLi 1 '■■ ;///O -i II -4..r-..I i ;I i-J-h- -t - ‘ ‘ ii..._ uii . -r-i—.....j •ri i I 1I4-44 i.■....'TTIXDI T'!:i.IXIXIX47.LZZX” XX4+X..________L-:—.^. l...,i .: i------ i_.. [.iri ! I il I iI Ti.1 i 1 "i-L4-1 xf..[J-i j.‘-ji' i I:f i.I i'' r i...'n 1 Ii.I J I.L_l.;TI;i._T I,I i ; •L , .338690 i..vic4LiJixtt«iUCo.P4i>iws > B«9UsW»»l. * tSS00.3464alO L-i_i_l4 I 17 i'- fk L Signature i I L BK^ 0909 :' IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): t *1 j-f 2 •^VV «-4 uvy s H 20 We.uJ CiecK M g UJ Us, yjr <t Cj "i, i (o6 a ^ I ? ; rot, IN,' r w Ip IS 3do Structure(s): Deck(s): L-LL^ ' '' /i :• Jj a S'o F+, a.Driveway(s); " D -Ft2Patio(s): b Ft2Sidewalk(s): — o Ft2Stairway(s): Q Ft2Retaining Wall(s): /a.0 Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 (d, b Ft2 ISO TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: M-Z— R2 i3,/0D » ) V X100 =___ LOT AREA:1 iH. b %iLSU^iS'o %TOTAL IMPERvii>US SURFACE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREA k'K X ■• r-\'S.' O r.*’1 n. r-< •H cncu*o C’ c•r-l k '’\ -0/ ' ’' >’ * “' /fJ' '■ *'* ''i' ■'v'^' Vp'v / r“ . //^ a; ' ' v;,-"-‘// c4oto • I i: •r r- rr:'r«‘ ■w'. -r ,sTit r'Li>'>1 '•'1 C.l’.^I -pc5r,: '( -V.l. t -.i‘,-v ,.oi « f 1 'rti'i; ■■;.'o'.'-t'bu ‘cjl-'t.'- cv^V. 4 ' -■\<;■ t. -s?'>-^•S^vTV fT- cC>0^ c X -V O't? c•c I i u P,‘j f. { 4 r >> ;',«■■• r-y^r'%-: "•u IN APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE William D. and Sharon R. Hoverson 4031 32"^* St. S. Fargo, ND 58104 (701) 730-5471 (cell) (701) 293-6724 (home) Lake Number: 519 Lake Name: West Silent Lake Lake Class: RD Section: 3J. Township: 136 Range: 041 Township Name: Dora Parcel Number 16000990343000 E-911 Address: 40228 Silent Acres Rd. Legal Description Silent Acres Lot 3 & TR BET LK & LOT Type of Variance Requested: Structure Setback Specify how your project varies from ordinance requirements: We request a variance of 72 feet from the required 100’ setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) in order to build a two-story 24’ X 28’ addition to our existing cabin. The existing cabin sits 19’ from the OHWL. We propose to site the front of the new addition 9 feet back from the front of the existing cabin. Therefore the setback of the new addition from OHWL would be 28 feet. We further propose to abandon and fill the existing holding tank, which is precariously near OHWL (approx. 30’). We would replace the holding tank with a lift station and drain field approximately 75 feet from OHWL. We also seek a variance of 40 feet from the required 150’ lot width for lakes now classified “RD”. (When we purchased the property in 1989, West Silent Lake was classified General Development - “GD”.) Thank you, William D. and Sharon R. Hoverson July 14,2011 + SCALE DRAWING FORM //p 060 99 03^ loon Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, iotiines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, weils, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. biuffs), and onsite impervious surface caicuiations. Q =•=un % Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) i no >1 iI I ^ \ rlllJ3'I Aw ? T’vh/p ''t3<3 ^I’tcn'l Acres Lort-3 LK-rLOT t 1 u ;a.7^o 1r T<3_-..!U» o T I13cr!(U 4 r -J>:......r1"r\ fr*; <5 /:/on / </) /Q0'5e4W>[ y^__nuwL tc=P ti9OfuA / -4 InO Oro.V /:..:oo<sC(:5 or iC-/\il ■X 1 w f4 4 4- r /I t- ■■■//!nr'4 # ^ :... . .;..4 H,_ /im r-i 17T/\7 AM»t)'gnj g /i\ V'Vh'iI//f\. /IVl fI ■ . 'i I.i,i'; "-''"rr I X,\t4:: : v t\:\tX..mK ^\ ;\l I CkviT4ir.q t 1\ TCfrr \\\-ni4Lxi X-\i ..i._.. .1.Ti -C ctb‘|n ;l<l'Itzz ;ff*: «...f. c<L.J f-f /!I.3?a:4-ooq,.^4,;...p,f.gggg^4?;iy*r^ R-1 figp 4V ofto HI ©It - c y-"1 2mi/X P»fXU-^OAC-—- Signature ot Property Owner 7Date BK —0909 Co. Printers • Fergus (ells. MS • 1-80O34&4S70 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): } 1 SX Ft2Structure(s):7 P{2 'M^l^ eODeck(s): / 9' Xy O’ o Ft2Driveway(s): C?Ft2Patio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s):O 2' A H' J0 old C« lo I■IStairway(s):y'o n O Ft2Retaining Wall(s): V" Xc y G( (j Ctx lo II 'n) (s' O Ft2 rLandscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 1^10^ Ft2 0'?\ , ) 0 n Ft2 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: LOT AREA: 2 i oH ^ OZ \ 0(1 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT AREA X100 =3-Ud % IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO