The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About16000990272000_Variances_10-06-20111098646 DOC# 1098646 hillmil III illDate Stamp 1098646 Fee; $46.00 Well Certificate [ ] Rec'd OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTARECEIVED Certified, Filed, and/or Recorded: October 14, 2011 9:45 AM Wendy L. Metcalf, Recorder AU6 3 0 2011 LANO 8, RESOURCE Returned To: LAND & RESOURCE By; LL L&R Initial THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee ^QQ Receipt Number ^ Accepted By / Date .^^^/^ COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK /JrMi, J-.DAYTIME PHONE 70f -772 " -^9PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS LAKE NUMBER Jg'Ca LAKE NAME iWST LAKE CLASS <6 2Y 6H (TOWNSHIP j 3> (a RANGE 7K o Xli OGq SECTION TOWNSHIP NAME E-911 „ADDRESS y^(XCPARCEL NUMBER Dch/r. sec, 2 -^ {■^Ctr^ CN^f^NS' 3ce>Cf4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION * Lor /BLot /<?^ TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Structure Setback )C Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster WECS Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. L^oosg (ON- ^ xi^ tS'nr^^ i\f-£ yc. "ho j-Lo C-B ---- 0 cic>(oUS'i ot\f^6h> "ISO £A\,S’ir size Q^SQicSsr/^^ S'9 ' l4/1/e//l4>ct£) cJsc/C. QjCCs^^ \2-'^ I^ *Lo<.j3tr Ut0di.G I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE / SANITATION CODE / SETBACK ORDANAND AN/OR WECS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED; IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. f/p-9- h / P^PERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER 7 ' pitTESIGNATURE OF APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) 345,194 • Victor Lundeen Co , Printers ■ Fergus Falls. Minnesota ^ pio//Date Of Hearing Time Motion Arral J. Helgerson - Application approved as requested. (7:05 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Thomas Lee made a motion, seconded by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 39’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement, as described in the variance application dated August 29, 2011, of a screen house on an existing deck being 6T from the ordinary high water level. The proposed development is replacement, maintenance and repair of the applicant’s property. iTrmanADtter Tail County Board of AdiyStmentC Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No /Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR LR Official/Date bk 072011-001 i . October 6, 2011 Page # 2 Mark Robert Deutschman - Application approved as requested. (6:50 p.m.) Mark Robert Deutschman, part of Government Lot 1, Section 28 of Tumuli Township by Ten Mile Lake, requested the following: Construction will occur on the lakeside of the building line in order to tie in the roof line of an addition to the existing structure. A hip roof will also be converted to a gable roof on part of the existing structure. The construction will start approximately 52’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. At the public hearing, the applicant presented additional information concerning the location of an existing drain field and its relationship to the proposed development. There was significant discussion regarding this issue; however, since it was not a part of the public notice for this hearing no action was taken. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, seconded by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 48’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the development as described in the variance application and other supporting documentation dated August 28, 201,1. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development. Judith Stoutland - Application approved as requested. (7:02 p.m.) Judith Stoutland, part of Government Lots 4 and 5, Section 7 of Otter Tail Township by Otter Tail Lake, requested the following; To purchase wetland credits from the state/county wetland bank. Unable to do onsite wetland replacement as required by the shoreland management ordinance. Roger Haberman, potential buyer, represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. Kyle Westergard, Inspector, explained to the Board why this type of variance is necessary. A letter addressing the wetland issues is a part of the applicant’s file, which is maintained by the Land and Resource Department. The Land and Resource Department is in agreement with the applicant’s proposal. After consideration and discussion, Thomas Lee made a motion, seconded by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as described in the variance application dated September 9, 2011. Arral J. Helgerson - Application approved as requested. (7:05 p.m.) Arral J. Helgerson, part of Lot 18 and Lot 19 Hoffman’s Beach, West McDonald Lake in Dora Township, requested a variance of 39’ from the required ordinary high water level of 100’ for the placement of a screen house on an existing deck located 6T from the ordinary high water level. Screen a 12’ by 16’ area next to home (3 sides and roof). Roof will be removable. Two doors - one on each side. The overall deck size in 750 square feet and the proposed screen house size is 192 square feet. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Thomas Lee made a motion, seconded by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 39’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of TOO’ for the placement, as described in the variance application dated August 29, 2011, of a screen house on an existing deck being 6T from the ordinary high water level. The proposed development is replacement, maintenance and repair of the applicant’s property. Break - 7:15 p.m until 7:30 p.m. Duane and Denise Mischel - Denied the application as submitted. (7:30 p.m.) Duane and Denise Mischel, Government Lot 5, part of Government Lot 6, Government Lot 7 and part of Government Lot 8, Section 17 of Edna Township by Big McDonald Lake, requested the following; Ordinary high water level setback and road right-of-way setback does not meet requirements for proposed Lot 1 Block 2 of the preliminary plat ■ of Mischel Subdivision as approved by the County Board on August 16, 2011. We are requesting this lot be declared buildable. Request a variance of 3’ 6” from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ and a variance of 67’ 9” from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the placement of a structure 16’ 6” from the road right-of-way and 32’ 3” from the ordinary high water level. At the public hearing, it was noted that the setback from the ordinary high water level would be 37’ 6” instead of 32’ 3” as stated in the application dated August 23, 2011. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion to declare Lot 1 Block 2 as a buildable lot and to allow the placement of a,structure no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing building line with the condition that Lot 1 Block 2 and Lot 2 Block 1 must be permanently attached and with the condition that the area with Lot 2 Block 1 cannot be used when determining impervious surface coverage for Lot 1 Block 2. -tTiI F;:nVED SCALE DRAWING FORM MiMill IbOOOq^ Oil zaoo 4 I :2 7^0 POLAND&i JURCg Tax Parcel Number(s) 1- The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface calculations. +■ Ii ' fOtlTI %Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Compiete Worksheet On Other Side)(• ■■ -f- I f-CiOTTA t 4. f-i 't-t-t...t CoTTAatr■ I ■r 1 f T i i...‘ \I- 4•i.±. t1 T4.t t i AJ ^ 1 : i t t>. 4 i f r r V —S’ -I I2^<c-'; I r ■ rIi" T t'r.■r -rTr;:r:T r z;t t'I ...I. ...f-'"' t"■4....i...-i- t ■1 .1.f ■II ’ 1 ii"'iT t i- T ;i i ;i .-it:■t f-ii'I, I ii" .i4 t' ••Iii"f I+J-+ It T1T ;;l-!!tL ■4. -I,i.4 I -4- r!l 'T i1'f ■■i i t. -■4-^ ■i .i i t ■[ t *"t'.1. t-4 I Soi -h :2c/^J4v<3- Sa LAlLe 72c?c/^> PY)/k: /r//g^ ... .:. .!r f'f J r :!4 '■4' i t-f I Date f //f Signature of Property Owner ...BK — 0909 (>36,596 • Victof Lundaert Co. Printars » F^us I alls, ( 1-8Q0-346-4870 . ■r IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): Structure(s): 073+3? - 7/Jr-Deck(s): Ft2Driveway(s): 4<,ooPatio(s): Ft2Sidewalk(s): Ft^^ ^Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wail(s): Ft2Landscaping; (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 9 S'Ft2LOT AREA: .2^^ (.7z^s~o X100 =% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO