HomeMy WebLinkAbout46000330126013_Variances_07-02-2009Variances
2
Barcode 128
-1-2^2009
1059927 OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA
10S9927I hereby certify that
this instrument #__
was fiied/recorded in this office
for record on the.day of
09 at pm
Wendy p Metcalf, jpounty Rebv: fA 'ury
recording fee well certificai
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 998-8095
Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us
Application Fee
COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number
Accepted By / Date
7>YV ME A^Jjr,£L.o />!,.)
ST." LAKE NAME
DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER
MAILING ADDRESS
^ . NB.LAKE CLASSfcl</^/ nLZA)f7t(_LAKE NUMBER
^7Z3lid..TOWNSHIP NAME 1.RANGE_
PARCEL y. .NUMBEr4^*»“ OlZ
SECTION TOWNSHIP
c F Air ^ drcf/od
Sg^ f^lftu:K£d -fer 4udl U^al ___________________
TYPE OF VARIANpEl^EQUESTED (PleaseXheck)
K Structure Size
E-911
ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5’^ /
Sewage System Subdivision Ciuster Misc.Structure Setback
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS
THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION.
oj^ $ I' oH '
S £>£^y~^T<3^ T^B OAt<>L ~ ^eyu<rs'f/'^£^
A q!^ 0^(*yc. STAuc-'f-uC^'^ deTS4t..l3/S
^ ^ ^ TO
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARiANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND /J T 4^
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCBSUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
/
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND &
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
W,lAc^SIGNATl/l1X.DATEURE OF PROPERTY OWNER
APPLICANTMUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
Wv
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)
stoolDate Of Hearing Time
Motion
Randal Remer - Approved the variance as modified. (7:02 p.m.)
After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve
a variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the placement of the proposed development
(dwelling, deck and garage) no closer to the ordinary high water level than 150’. The variance as approved does not directly or
indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development. It was noted that the variance as approved will provide the
applicant with a reasonable use of his property. It was also noted that there is adequate room for the proposed development at
the 150’ setback and no adequate hardship/practical difficulty had been shown that would allow for the granting of the variance as
requested.
Chairman/btter Tail County Board of A^stment
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
X Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
L R Officiairoate'
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR
bk 0106-001
v. Lundeen 324855
/ July 2, 2009
( Page # 2 •
Loon Lake Resort - Approved the variance as modified and with conditions. (6:35 p.m.)
Loon Lake Resort, Lot 9 Loon Mere Estates and part of Government Lots 3, 4, 5 and the North Half of the Northwest
Quarter, Section 35 of Candor Township by Loon Lake, requested the following: The old house is 20’ from the lake,
1, ) We would like to put a new house there because of the topography of the property we need an 80’ variance there.
2. ) The setback on the north side is only 25’ from the property line we will need 25’ variance there, 3.) On the west
side (away from the lake) we would like to put a walkout basement. So our customers have access to the storm
shelter, office, laundry. Also the garage will be at that level to avoid a lot of fill. Mike Conlon, Hilltop Homes appeared
with the applicant. The audience was polled with Amanda Gronhovd, Sandy Gronhovd, and Neil Strawhorn
addressing various questions to the Board regarding the requirements of the County ordinance. After consideration
and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a
variance of 50’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 25’ from the required
north side lot line setback of 50’ for the construction of a new dwelling no closer to the ordinary high water level than
50’ and at least 25’ from the side lot line with the condition that the old garage must be removed by the time the new
building is completed and with the condition that the two cabins identified for removal in the materials submitted with
the application must be removed. It was noted that the variances as approved will result in an overall improvement to
the property and will provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their resort property.
iance as modified. (7:02 p.m.)Randal Remer - Appro:
mer, part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 33 of Otter Tail Township by Sherman
Lake, requested a variance of 8T from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the placement of a
new dwelling with deck approximately 119’ from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 42’ from-'S>erfee|wed
ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the placement of a detached-garage 158’ from the ordinary high water
level. This lake was reclassified in May of 2009 from a General Developmeotl^tte toarUatitrat Environmeot- Lake.
Marvin Monson, Contractor, represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Kevin
Nold expressing concern with the lake reclassification process. A letter from Ron Pollard and an email from Kevin
Nold in support of the variance as requested were read for the record. After consideration and discussion, Randall
Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 50’ from the
required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the placement of the proposed development (dwelling, deck and
garage) no closer to the ordinary high water level than l50’. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly
grant any other variances for the proposed developmen'r it was noted that the variance as approved will provide the
applicant with a reasonable use of his property. It was also noted that there is adequate room for the proposed
development at the 150’ setback and no adequate hardship/practical difficulty had been shown that would allow for
the granting of the variance as requested.
Rai
Melville R. Bois - Approved the variance as requested. (7:20 p.m.)
Melville R. Bois, Lot 8 Block 1 Belmont Pointe, Belmont Lake in Nidaros Township, requested the following: I have a
permit for an addition to my home. It allows for two sets of steps from porch and from a deck on the north side. I
want to replace the steps and add a five foot wrap around deck. This will encroach the 200’ setback by 4’. Setback
would be 196’ not the required 200’. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as
requested. A letter from David and Diane Rust in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. After
consideration and discussion, Paul Larson made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to
approve the variance as requested in the variance application dated June 9, 2009 and as depicted on the drawing
filed with the application. The proposed deck connects two existing permitted areas of the structure.
Hardship/practical difficulty is the unique shape of the applicant’s property.
Robert W. Adamson - Approved the variance application as requested with a condition. (7:27 p.m.)
Robert W. Adamson, Lot 17 White Swan Beach, Swan Lake in Dane Prairie Township, requested a variance of 46’
from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for the replacement of existing non-conforming structure
54’ from the ordinary high water level. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as
requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Paul Larson and carried
with Michael Harris voting no, to approve a variance of 46’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’
for the replacement of an existing non-conforming structure 54’ from the ordinary high water level with the condition
that the proposed structure must meet the required road right-of-way setback of 20’. It was noted that the proposed
development is behind the existing home away from the lake. It was also noted that the variance as approved does
not directly or indirectly grant any other variances for the proposed development.
iiiikU
I Wayne Stein - re: Variance Hearing Randal Remer July 2, 2009
"Kevin Mold" <bcha-nnaintenance@qwest.net>
<wstein@co.ottertail.mn.us>
6/29/2009 11:14 am
re: Variance Hearing Randal Remer July 2, 2009
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Mr. Stein:
I am writing in support of the variance hearing for Randal Remer at 28635 Sherman Loop. I have viewed
Mr. Remer's plans and feel this will be a great addition to the Sherman Lake Area. Had Mr. Remer, his
contractor, or anyone e else been informed of the lake reclassification he could have obtained a permit
and be started on his project.
I do not understand how someone can reclassify our lake without notifying the owners and having any kind
of hearing. Someone has made all the existing 9 lots unbuildable without a variance considering the road
is already in place.
Please try to explain how this reclassification was done and what the procedure was or is. It would be my
feeling that someone has decreased the value of our properties without any notice.
Please enter my letter of support into the record, I am unsure if I will be able to attend the hearing.
Kevin Mold, Owner
28661 Sherman Loop
PO Box 202
Ottertail, MN 56561-0202
701-840-0341
iuu
Notice of Hearing for Variance
Otter Taii County
Government Services Center
510 Fir Ave W
Fergus Falis, MN 56537
(218) 998-8030/998-8041
Email - wstein@co.ottertail.mn.us
www.co.otter-tail.mn.us
Applicant and/or applicant’s representative must be present at the scheduled hearing.
To Whom It May Concern:
Randal Remer
7244 3'*' Ave S
Richfield, MN 55423
has made application to the Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment for a variance as per requirements of the Otter Tail County
Shoreland Management Ordinance, the Otter Tail County Set Back Ordinance and/or the Subdivision Controls Ordinance. The
Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment will assemble for this hearing on
Thursday, July 2, 2009 at 6:00 p.m.
in the Commissioners’ Room of the Otter Tail County Government Services Center, Fergus Falls, MN. (Please use the public
entrance located on the northeasterly side of the Government Services Center. The second left off Fir Ave.) Individuals
requiring special accommodations should contact the County Auditor's office prior to the date of the public hearing.
The property concerned in the application is legally described as
part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter,
Property Address - 28635 Sherman Loop
Section 33, Township 134, Range 39 - Township Name - Otter Tail
Lake No. 56-207, Lake Name - Sherman, Class - NE
The variance requested is -
a variance of 81 ’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’ for the placement of a new dwelling with deck
approximately 119’ from the ordinary high water level and a variance of 42’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of
200’ for the placement of a detached garage 158’ from the ordinary high water level. This lake was reclassified in May of 2009
from a General Development Lake to a Natural Environment Lake.
'Wayne Stein
Board of Adjustment Secretary
Date; June 12, 2009 ,y]?;ED
(z'Wi-eyC)
U-rA±XCL'r
CmV^XlXALc^Lo-A o
rs
ruo/‘^I>L\Aynj2_^
0-^^AAAJl>n-A_^
AF^*^-AXjC\yvv^:j;^^
>
received
JUN 1 6 2009
UlltKIWULU.AUUllUK
FERGUS FALLS, MN
“After 5 Days Return to”
Otter Tail County Auditor’s Office
Government Services Center
510 Fir Ave W
Fergus Falls, MN 56537
f£liW
’u.
RONALD J & VICKI A POLLARD
28821 SHERMAN LAKE RD
OTTERTAIL MN 56571 9647
ROAD RIGHT OF WAY3/A.120’-0*
t 129.24'
1 II
I
VoCM
CMi 23'-6' /I I/
/10’J
I GRAVELIo GARAGEDRIVEWAYIII(26'X26')InItoII//
/I
III CONC. WALKWAY
WOOD DECK
CABIN
(30’X40’)
WOOD DECK
(ABOVE GRADE)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
-----1
3/A.1
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET:
• *
List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing):
Structure(s):
Ft2Deck(s):
im Ft2Driveway(s):
Ft2Patio(s):
Ft^Sidewalk(s):
Ft2Stairway(s):
75 Ft2Retaining Wall(s):
R2Landscaping;
(Plastic Barrier)
Other:Ft2
^!2 Ft2
Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE;
LOT AREA:
15'^70/57 X100 =%
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO
b
■■I..i 1IhHJ.4..1[=hT1f
iSBLSDmwEmwv!1"T‘1 1
1-
- QPP ~ 55 -zllA
Tax Parcel Number(s)
The scale drawing must include the outside dimension (lotlines) of the property above the ordinary high water level, and must identify the type,
size (square feet), and location of all existing and proposed structures, additional onsite impervious surfaces, road right-of-way(s), ordinary high
water level(s), septic tank(s), drainfield(s), bluff(s) & wetland(s). Must also Include all proposed topographical alterations.
/ Scale j %
Impervious Surface Ratio
(Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side)
■4....f it"i U !r Tt"t II1-4 (“r 1 !,
-4-4.....trrr
—,-i.144 i.jti T!I „4_.i f i
[HIt r!::::t I Lh 1I..4i-I1-4"I I !.-i-.44-t 4-j-
1J...L.4..--•»t'I
t i.t-L4..h trf1f..i.I L.I _1..r J.W|•hh-'-t "ttir...t t T"i 4rf■rt]'L(liiLJ.rri ..I....•4-•Ti"T
tT It■H
I t -tm-~r1 !-|-T..r:;r Irrf-J—1-4i■I '1T ,.4_.4...J m....I4..f-rIri::!.1 4^.44M 4--i-iH a1..L.t IItTJ..I.!1.^.1-------T„4„4-,.r"4'■]..i....['T I1i—-1-.4,.■t -f-'r-
tr..r-7-“4"t't■I 1Iht["f"■f,i:I HH'i=nirrrj..[..ri..ri.....i...s......i:T-Hr-r T!4[-t..L,g-rJ,
aT[i-i h 4..T~
•fT4:,1,I..4,.4 r:i:.....!..1...j.--------ititiry1:1 __iH.m —rtt"f J !i1 .L4..-—f-I I------r....I.,'....!.....’■ I :
cmxE 4.1.li.1-.hi..i.mT]■ii 4.-I I4art It4-KT-'
r..!..r 14
...441:i.f+41 ..i.ri: 4,.IIt1inI ...1.....1.L--------------1----1.....i----1.....-j......j......i---------i..... .....(......y....-JI 1 ' I4 4^ i ! I Int44H44ff
rg, i , I ' ,
•f-(i'I ..f.-Ii..!.]i •I
TiI■f
..4-H --t-l!"TIi.fl„..i..rI 4..,4....-.t TU-L ..1..,.1....i...!.f.rt...."T!I
_1t•t--I ]4 4.iI4--..L IM ‘ir i.I.f..r^:.i..h
-t-.r 4...■i..1..144..(■! rPi :1:1:t t TZL44It44-^.^.!-r ..L1.ri"t “1-4..1..4.ri..j-...!.-(-{.f-|
..[.i^T
Ii.
m
!■.....if:I X.(1 ■-T iiZi:1"_]■I-T ■r [i't
T t"I ,.f4..........t :;f 1'
i-+-■f",.uf r 7".1 -1.•-r-T.L .L,.1I1'1innT 1a."t cn I1..L fft t7-1"I itii t..f.1g-1 1.1 I
T•{..f-rt —4_..f..f..!..r iftIi...j,.
r If---t....-I...1-4 .‘1:1L..L T f itTT11
t4 ;p[4 I f-4-4.;:l:l..j..nilI:1l-t •r□T'\1 II..l.r-f ! 1]14,^TT 1 itI■4 ::f rtr!tI-1..-4-....rLLI1-4'I.r ....4-4rrt iTl"+i.ir—• -.r.\i—1-4
..p ‘T -T-i i-J-r.„41•1-4f44.:tr:ttt i.—1
'I i I I
-r:4-T T -I--!..n.I _-r-r 1.!I L 7 iO-..j.,T T"'■44 (-i-..h"'44 -I‘ T IT'I'I _LaI
.1.Signature of Property Owner: ' , ^ j j i |I ' J pf 1 I ! n
ti.h-fi
i _:, Date
Lundeen Co;. Printers
; ':::PL
870 ......■I ' L-i--I M i i r
4-I I ( I nr-
Fergus Falls..MN~».Ht 11!BK — 0207
1 ‘ !...1
.4-ViciorI•ri 329:086 1-800346-4I1I1.i !...,1IPt f.Ilt.1 !iI
I I
CABIN
GARAGE
LOn LEVEL
I
VROADK)
r c
DECK MAIN LEVEL DECK I
* ■I)BASEMENT 1WALK-01 IT4^V fADD HLL I
—\i■r-STEP FTNG
1 MAINTAIN PROPER ! DEPTH BELOW FROST
CUT AREA’-L.-I_____a U JI
I
I
1 iBOVEjm_ ______
(LOWEST POSSIBLE Flj” LEVEL)
UNEI
tv>OHWL3^LAKEIIISHOREII
I I
)II III
225’250’200’125’175'0’25’50’75’100’150’
^ 511^ 5BCWN D
5c/te: r - \6 O' 8'52 III
ROAD RIGHT OF WAY3/A.120’-0’
t 1^t 4 AA A 4>