Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12000310220000_Variances_06-07-2012Variances 2 Barcode 128 li) *1*Z0IZ11XU4«1 DOC# 1110481 1110481 Fee: $46.00 Certified, Filed, and/or Recorded: Well Certificate [ ] Rec'd June 14, 2012 10:45 AM Wendy L. Metcalf, Recorder OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL COUNTY. MINNESOTADate Stamp ' IAND ,S Returned To: LAND & RESOURCE By: NDB L&R Initial THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER, 540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 998-8095 Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us Application Fee COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number , Accepted By / Date Dnr,Ac, r\. lAocrx Pofeoimp rTorAK4ir>\^,f<\'M 65'/!S7-/:)7^0 P'N6 (olo\\2\\PROPERTY OWNER DAYTIME PHONE MAILING ADDRESS & DLAKE NUMBER _____LAKE CLASS Co RU S T LAKE NAME 3821SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGE TOWNSHIP NAME H(c>lS0 Ghf l|u)J 8 ,P-i?(Vq.ia (W'iR 1P.O0O3I&2I 7000PARCEL NUMBER E-911 ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION Pl(lrL3..- 1-^0 TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) X ClusterStructure Setback Structure Size Sewage System WECSSubdivision Misc. SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION. SrcYxll 0(\^\ofQ2tfm^o\Qf pUiV.OAOf lako hf 'f' I UNDERSTAND THAT ! HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE / SANITATION CODE / SETBACK Ol^pANAND AN^OR. I ALSO UNDEFBTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REaUlREDriTl! RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. f^4 \\j 2^12 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER -------DATE MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING (Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing), SCANNED 345,194 * Vidor Lundeen Co , Printers • Fergus Falls. Minnesota ! n TimeDate Of Hearing I ffwa + Motion Donna M. Heisler Moen - Approved the variance as requested. (7:34 p.m.) After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to approve the proposed subdivision as described in the variance application dated May 11, 2012 and as illustrated on the drawings submitted with the application. The variance as requested makes sense based on the existing lot lines and the placement of the existing structures. •f'' 'y. --------- CPt^rmafi^OtterTail bount ard of Adj^tment Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) K- No i yyACopy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR L R Official/Date bk 072011-001 .1.4' t" I_i 4..!.. I? lEOOn'^ I 0? I 700 0 Tax Parcel Number(s) The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface calculations. ; I'' - 37 feeT lo %Scale Impervious Surface Ratio (Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side) I-f tt-..1. i r .u.1_T■'“'r —r" ■■L.I ..Li"TILI !■tJ. 8•1-t:J11 '!-,x.-ij iL(9^2lOV['i T- -1 —v..._ _L 44./I T-O ;I .l )t4i4c SW&5 I T_.11I If T —P Ai ••f-- (REGElWEp:M4-i I j...1.00 4-■h— mTI 'Ki 4'—•r :.r,r1 FEkjfeatmjzmprr T'I 1.^slD &R ::S01:JR(l4.! czlI t:m-ft--...|.! .:B2du;:p:"y -Cr,I '.4 xild' If *><34 T aSEE,kj i I ■tnt ..p Sj®-aA/_D,1 iI 1r iI -t1,:.Q 1 r TiTii ..Fxnid:.L !„L_■]~1 "T!I ±t..I1i■L 4 1(-—f—T T fiI-f-□xixixr I I ■if4I i!I i I -M.!i1,11 -L.I■<H.. :sj mmM JI r ■-■+-:Tik) i4w4 i j U\fr:r tL:g .4-A ItI V I I \-7 I-4-t"V :p■'■■j—1 I I1.5i ■t }- I Hok I:i:|:•i“ "r [II..Mi t-i-f..f■i T■| I Ifrr[!I__1 1 Q Si- d.!!a:1 -ri-tf ITItr1I_L_ ,T t-r 'i-f-1:Uxte I J 4-Iiri:I L.11~!.1.—Ii -I-sfI i:-4 i.1/t1fjjpgir'1 4 _i©;tfi ... f..[I n Ii' ri! 1i i [4-44.1-4.4 i-4-I ii_4 __.L_n -]T‘i tl“Li’’-f “rrt4-4mFn;t‘4^6 4FIF..L njgjCsc- I I j :i Date--------!0909 i i ,.m'n. .U. 338'536.-Victo -U Co Printers- ndecn js Pell:..1>8(<16-4670.i IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET: List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces (must be shown on scale drawing): 2 is 7 Ft2Structure(s): Ft2Deck(s); 3070 F,.Driveway(s): Ft2Patio(s); m Ft2Sidewalk(s): Ft2Stairway(s): Ft2Retaining Wall(s): Ft2Landscaping: (Plastic Barrier) Other:Ft2 6|(p Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: Ft2LOT AREA: 1010xioo =%( LOT AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOTOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ■ >* St. Ann’s Church - Approved the variance as requested. (7:30 p.m.) St. Ann’s Church, part of the Northwest Quarter, section 14 of Compton Township, requested the foilowing; Owner proposed to redraw the boundaries of the Compton Cemetery to conform with the existing fence iines. Owner will deed approximately 1,2 acres to two adjoining property owners and receive approximately 0.3 acres from one adjoining property owner. This will reduce the Compton Cemetery from approximately 2.5 acres to approximately 1.6 acres which will not meet the 2.5 acre requirement of Section Vll(1) of the Subdivision Controls Ordinance of Otter Tail County. Malcolm Whynott and Barb Butler represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Thomas Lee made a motion, second by Joe Maske and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested in the application dated April 25, 2012 and as depicted on the drawings submitted with the variance application. y^onna WI. Heisler Moen - Approved the variance as requested. (7:34 p.m.) Donna M. Heisler Moen, part of Government Lot 3, Section 31 of Corliss Township by Big Pine Lake, requested the following: small undeveloped triangular portion of Big Pine Lake lot (Parcel 12000310217000) to be subdivided and permanently attached to adjoining lot (Parcel 12000310220000), which is currently owned by Robert and Judy Larson. Both lots to remain buildable for single family residential use. Lots meet minimum lot area and water frontage for platted lots. Lance Heisler represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to approve the proposed subdivision as described in the variance application dated May 11, 2012 and as illustrated on the drawings submitted with the application. The variance as requested makes sense based on the existing lot lines and the placement of the existing structures. Steven P. Berg - Approved the variance as requested. (7:36 p.m.) Steven P. Berg, part of Government Lot 9, Section 1 of Sverdrup Township by East Lost Lake, requested the following: request a variance of 27’ from the required 100’ setback to replace existing dwelling and add an addition. Setback will be 73' to ordinary high water level. Also requesting a variance of IT from the required 30’ bluff setback placing the dwelling 19’ from top of bluff. The applicant’s wife also appeared at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested. After consideration and discussion, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 27’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and a variance of 1T from the required top of bluff setback of 30’ for the replacement of an existing dwelling (replacement and addition) 73’ from the ordinary high water level and 19’ from the top of the bluff as depicted on the drawing dated May 16, 2012. The proposed development will utilize the same footprint as the existing development with an addition to the rear (away from the bluff) and the proposed development will be an environmentally friendly improvement as it will address the current runoff issue. Gerard and Maureen Knudsen - Approved the variance as requested. (7:40 p.m.) Gerard and Maureen Knudsen, Lot 1 Block 2 Bailey Beach and Parcel C in Government Lot 9, Section 1 of Sverdrup Township by East Lost Lake, requested the following: remove existing cabin and construct new cabin on or behind existing footprint of old cabin which places setback from ordinary high water, level mark at 89’ to 96’. This location would be behind “string test” of neighboring cabins on each side. The ordinary high water level variance will allow new cabin not to encroach on existing storage building. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as -requ6sted.-After-consideration-and..discussion._Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Joe Maske and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested in the application dated April 28, 2012 and as depicted on the drawing submitted with the application. It was noted that the existing cabin and decl< will be removed and that the proposed development will be further away from the ordinary high water level than thejlocation of the existing cabin. Hardship/practical difficulty is a substandard lot of record. Scott Jennings Ehike - Approved the variance as requested. (7:42 p.m.) Scott Jennings Ehike, part of Government Lot 1 and part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 17 of Hobart Township by Rose Lake, requested the following: Too close to road right-of-way. Change existing storage area and raise low portion of existing roof to match existing high roof of dwelling being 0’ from township road right-of-way. • Required setback is 20’. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance'as requested. After consideration and discussion, Thomas Lee made a motion, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 20’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the development as proposed in the variance application dated May 14, 2012 and as illustrated on the drawing submitted with the application. It was noted that the proposed development will be in the same footprint as the existing structure.