Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout42000140138003_Variances_04-11-2002soisoi OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OTTER TAIL MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this instrument # was filed/recorded in this office for recoi^ on the //O day of uLp] 2002 at Wendy L, Metcalf, County, Recover D^jty^by:■ Recording feet J ^ well certificate THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVEI>f=««-?flE COUNTY RECORDER APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL COURTHOUSE, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537 (218) 739 -2271 COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK•kirk Application Fee Receipt Number, Accepted By / Date 0ok>^ ^DAYTIME PHONEPROPERTY OWNER ‘b LuA, 0(cJ- (lA. -WOT? aJijo 6/A>/eezmhL PT SoJbUt lof- ^i£ '/v UJ S flds^ Ilf Hds C S~ ^2-0 !(f Jb £><r ? H O'l. op oj /3 iA s-c. ^ p oj^ i, 5W Oi (lOP:t>) ADDRESS AKE CLASSLAKE NAMELAKE NUMBER H-/J6 TOWNSHIP NAMETOWNSHIPRANGESECTION fi ^Inoo^o IOD^PARCEL NUMBER E-911 Address LEGAL DESCRIPTION TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check) Sewage System ^Misc.Structure Size Subdivision ClusterStructure Setback SPECIFY VARIANCE REQUESTE pi^e^/^eiA^ of' Ca. ft. Ctfh ChJcA^ J}v^ fo /1€(aJ Oui I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACTXAND & RESOUFW^E MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER. '7^ DATESIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing) / 3 .4i^€'Crav l^l'Olro 12/ -0V~0 133, OiDO -'/3 -too ‘ / y/^to- 0 \!M-^05 /53 'OX) / t35-0 0^ /3S-6DO l>A/- 'f fon-'/Ajfs101' 0~d /O^f f/J 1 /}y;J >tl00 3L-Date Of Hearing Time// Motion John and Margaret Lewis - Approved as requested. (8:45 p.m.) Motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested and in the location as depicted on the applicants’ drawing. The Board of Adjustment understood that the granting of this variance would place the septic tank less than 10’ from the deck, however, due to practical difficulties (water level), the need to provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property and the lack of other alternative sites for the placement of the septic tank it was the opinion of the Board of Adjustment that this was the best that could be done and that this variance approval will not establish a precedence because of the unique situation. -------- Chairman/Otter Tail Board of Adjustmentoun Permit!^required from Land & Resource Management Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management) No Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant And the MN DNR L R Official/uate bk 0501-001 305,391 • Victor Lundeen Cc.. Printers, Fergus Falls, MN • 1-800-346-4870 System design must be to scale and must include the proposed location of the sewage system, all existing/proposed buildings, property lines, the ordinary high water level of the water body, wetlands, bluff and all water wells within 150' of the sewage system. inch(es) equals 3c) feet/Scale:feet, orgrid(s) equals SIGNATURE:SUBMITTED BY: FIRM NAME: ADDRESS: QHH' DATE: MPCA LICENSE #: LICENSE CATEGORY: ^TT rl' 4 ] BK - 0599 - 029 300.617 • VicJOf LurvJeen Co . Print«rs • Fergus Falls. MN • 1-800-346-4870 SITE DATA WORKSHEET «LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Otter Tail County 121 W. Junius Ave., Suite 130 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 OWNER: TELEPHONE NUMBERMIDDLEFIRSTLAST NAME ADDRESS: ZIP CODESTATECITYSTR./RT. TWP. NAMERANGETWP.SEC.LAKE NAMELAKE/RIVER NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:SOIL BORING LOG - Date COLOR & MUNSELL NO. DEPTH(INCHES)STRUCTURETEXTURE BLOCKY PLATY PRISMATIC NONEPARCEL NUMBER BLOCKY PLATY PRISMATIC NONE FIRE NUMBER NUMBER OF BEDROOMS BLOCKY PLATY PRISMATIC NONE GARBAGE DISPOSAL: YES NO WELL CASING DEPTH;ft.BLOCKY PLATY PRISMATIC NONE FLOODPLAIN: YES NO VEGETATION; AQUATIC TERRESTRIAL BLOCKY PLATY PRISMATIC NONE SLOPE AT INSTALLATION SITE:% TYPE OF OBSERVATION: Probe Pit Boring PARENT MATERIAL: Till Outwash Loess Bedrock Alluvium COMMENTS: ORIGINAL SOIL:Yes No COMPACTED SOIL: Yes No DEPTH OF BORING:ft. PERC TEST #2PERC TEST #1 - TWO TESTS ARE REQUIRED - PERC RATEWATER DROPINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTHPERC RATE TIMEWATER DROPTIMEINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH STARTSTART DROP PERCTIME PERC RATEWATER DROPINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTHPERC RATE TIMEINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROPTIME REFILLREFILL TIME DROP PERCTIMEDROPPERC PERC RATEWATER DROPWATER DEPTHPERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROPTIME REFILLREFILL DROP PERCTIMETIMEDROPPERC PERC RATEWATER DROPWATER DEPTHTIMEINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DROP PERC RATETIMEINTERVAL (MINUTESl WATER DEPTH REFILLREFILL DROP PERCTIMETIME DROP PERC PERC RATEWATER DROPINTERVAL (MINUTES!WATER DEPTHPERC RATE TIMEWATER DROPTIMEINTERVAL (MINUTESl WATER DEPTH REFILLREFILL PERCTIMEDROPDROPPERCTIME WATER DROP PERC RATEINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTHPERC RATE TIMETIMEINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROP REFILLREFILL TIME DROP PERCDROPPERCTIME PERC RATEWATER DROPINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTHWATER DROP PERC RATE TIMETIMEINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH REFILLREFILL TIME DROP PERCDROPTIMEPERC PERC RATEWATER DROPPERC RATE TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTHINTERVAL (MINUTES)WATER DEPTH WATER DROPTIME REFILLREFILL DROP PERCTIMETIMEDROPPERC PROPOSED DESIGN; PRESSURE DIST.GRAVITY DIST.MOUND HOLDING TANKTRENCHBEDATGRADE SPECIFY: — SYSTEM DESIGN ON BACK — OUTHOUSE OTHERSEWER LINE ^April 11,2002 Page " 5 Jim and Gwen Howe - Denied. (8:31 p.m.) Jim and Gwen Howe, Et. A!., Casselton, ND, requested a variance of 7’ 6” from the required side lot line setback of 10’ for an addition to an existing structure 2' 6" from the side lot line. The property is described as the East Half of Lot 8 and the West Half of Lot 9 and part of Government Lot 6, Section 5 of Dunn Township by Pelican Lake. A letter from Anne Gjesdahl Anderson requesting that the 10’ side lot line setback be maintained was read for the record. A letter from Mary Harpstead, Trustee noting several objections to the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with Philip Harpstead speaking against the variance as requested. Mr. Harpstead noted visual and drainage concerns that would be created by placing this addition so near to the lot line. After consideration, motion v;as made by Cecil Femling, second by Paul Larson and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested noting that placing this much additional structure next to the lot line would only enhance the existing problem and would not be consistent with prior actions of the Board of Adjustment. John and Margaret Lewis - Approved as requested. (8:45 p.m.) John and Margaret Lewis, Pelican Rapids, MN requested a variance to place a septic tank and a lift station closer than 50’ to a wetland. The property is described as a 10 acre parcel in the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 14 of Norwegian Grove Township. A letter from 1. A. Slatten in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. Ross Seifert, Sherbroke Septic Service, also appeared with the applicant. The audience was polled with Joe Maske speaking for the variance as requested. Mr. Makse noted the extremely high water levels, which are beyond the applicants’ control. After consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to approve the variance as requested and in the location as depicted on the applicants’ drawing. The Beard of Adjustment understood that the granting of this variance would place the septic tank less than 10’ from the deck, however, due to practical difficulties (water level), the need to provide the applicants with a reasonable use of their property and the lack of other alternative sites for the placement of the septic tank it was the opinion of the Board of Adjustment that this was the best that could be done and that this variance approval will not establish a precedence because of the unique situation. Donald and Joyce Grant - Approved with condition. (9:00 p.m.) Donald and Joyce Grant, Fergus Falls, MN, requested a variance of 19’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for an addition to a dwelling 81' from the ordinary high water level. The property is described as Lot 5, River View Lane, Otter Tail River in .Aurdal Township. Scott D. Grant and Mark Bezek represented the applicants at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve a variance of 19’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ for an addition, as depicted on the submitted drawing, to a dwelling 8T from the ordinary high water level with the condition that the proposed addition must meet the string line test. The string line test is to be applied from the front corner of the applicant’s house to the neighbor’s house to the North. Hardship is the terrain of the applicants’ property. Bruce Busch - Approved with condition. (9:05 p.m.) Bruce Busch, West Fargo, ND, requested a variance for the installation of 2-1,500 gallon holding tanks closer than 10’ to the lot line. The property is described as Lot 22, Henry’s Hill, Franklin Lake in Dunn Township. Ross Seifert, Sherbroke Septic Service, represented the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve a variance for the installation of 2-1,500 gallon holding tanks as depicted on the applicant’s drawing with the condition that the township must provide a letter of approval. April 11,2002 Page # 6 Alan W. Pettit Trust - Denied (9:13 p.m.) Alan W. Pettit Trust, Wadena, MN, requested the following; “We will have to re-roof the roof in the future. So we want to raise the back or south side of roof in a dormer fashion so that we will have more headroom on that side or south side of roof. The north side of roof is higher than the back or south side. The building will not be made wider, longer etc. Just part of same maybe 3 to 5 ft higher to match front. Carpenter calls it changing roof style." It appears that the variance necessary is a variance to raise a roof on a second dwelling (sleeping room). The property is described as part of Jackson and McKees Addition and part of Government Lot 1, Section 23 of Pine Lake Township by Big Pine Lake. December 13, 2001 Meeting - An email from Sylvester and Louise Knapp in support of the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Cecil Femling, second by David Holmgren and unanimously carried, to table per the applicant’s written request the public hearing concerning this application until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment. April 11, 2002 Meeting - After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Randall Mann, second by Steve Schierer and unanimously carried, to deny the variance as requested noting that the applicant’s request if granted would allow for the continued use of a prohibited use. Lorraine Hicks - Approved Option 2 (9:23 p.m.) Lorraine Hicks, Fergus Falls, MN, requested the following: as shown in the site plan drawing on file with the County we wish to add onto the existing structure, which was built pre-ordinance in 1935. The new addition shall be no closer to the ordinary high water level than the existing structure, or approximately, 38’, therefore, requiring a variance of 162’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 200’. It should be noted that the applicant owns approximately 360’ of shoreline covering six lots, the plot contains a wetland and the site of the septic system leaves little choice on the placement of this request. The applicant would like to develop the wetland area into a natural habitat area and is prepared to consider making part of the shoreline into a natural frontage. The property is described as Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, Fish Lake Beach, Fish Lake in Aurdal Township. December 13, 2001 Meeting - Anthony Hicks appeared along with the applicant at the public hearing. The audience was polled with Clifford and Margie Ringquist speaking in favor of the applicant’s request. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to table, with the verbal agreement of the applicant, this public hearing until the next scheduled meeting of the Board of Adjustment so that the applicant will have an opportunity to consider other possible alternatives for the proposed development. April 11, 2002 Meeting - It was noted that the applicant has done what the Board of Adjustments had requested at the December 13, 2001 meeting. After discussion and consideration, motion was made by Steve Schierer, second by Cecil Femling and unanimously carried, to approve option two as presented in the revised detailed plans submitted by the applicant for this public hearing. With no further business, Randall Mann, Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at 9;30 p.m. ! 1'^ Wayne S^n, Secretary (y