HomeMy WebLinkAbout41000990304000_Variances_06-02-2011Variances
Barcode 128
2.
DOC# 10931461093146 1093146OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER
OTTER TAIL COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee: $46.00
Well Certificate [ ] Rec'dCertified Filed, and/or Recorded;
June 09, 2011 10:45 AM
Wendy L. Metcalf, Recorder
Returned To:
LAND & RESOURCE
By. NDB
THE ABOVE SPACE IS RESERVED FOR THE COUNTY RECORDER
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL
GOVERNMENT SERVICES CENTER
540 WEST FIR, FERGUS FALLS, MN 56537
(218) 998-8095
Otter Tail County’s Website: www.co.ottertail.mn.us
Application Fee
COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION IN BLACK INK Receipt Number
Accepted By / Date
V- KkJDAYTIME PHONE
a//
PROPERTY OWNER kO
MAILING ADDRESS Ujri.
LAKE NUMBER 5T'-C 03lake NAME ^t LAKE CLASS
£35:SECTION OU TOWNSHIP / 3 ^ RANGE TOWNSHIP NAME
'\hcoPARCEL
NUMBER
E-911
ADDRESS
CfCT)%^ U'\~Lo/’fP)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(
TYPE OF VARIANCE REQUESTED (Please Check)
structure Setback X Structure Size Sewage System Subdivision Cluster Misc.
SPECIFY HOW YOUR PROJECT VARIES FROM ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE BE BRIEF AS
THIS WILL BE USED FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION.
/■O
S K c f ■€ .
L-^C)2» IC> o AC f
lOO
\jj\ T“V».S ^ r/-w I'
p r f y f\ —^ ^
or ^ I•f f-r —3 <2.U-e ss 1-.W ^
p/oierfrt U/14) irt corwr 1
r<iu«sJ ^
f-oI UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE APPLIED FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE/SUBDIVISION CONTROLS ORDINANCE OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT OTHER PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT LAND &
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REGARDING THIS MATTER.
Oc.^~/^/ V
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER / AGENT FOR OWNER DATE
APPLICANT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING
(Applicant Will Receive Notification As To The Date/Time Of Hearing)RECEIVED
MAY I I 2011
LAND & RESOURCE
aoil-^. Q3t /?m.Date Of Hearing TimeUl AfU2
Motion
Darwyn and Wendy Smith - Approved a variance from the ordinary high water ievei and denied the side lot line variances
as requested with a condition. (8:02 p.m.)
After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Thomas Lee and unanimously carried, to approve
the placement of a dwelling no closer to the ordinary high water level than the dwelling to the east and to deny the side lot line
setback variances as requested with the condition that the shed currently located down by the lake and on the lot line must be
placed in a location, as verbally agreed to by the applicant, in a location that complies with the setback requirement of the
Shoreland Management Ordinance. The applicants’ property is a substandard lot of record. Note - the applicant can either
remove and relocated the shed or remove and replace with a new shed so long as the setback requirements of the ordinance,are
met.
oard of Adji^merTt
Permit(s) required from Land & Resource Management
^ Yes (Contact Land & Resource Management)
No
,ar(
Copy of Application Mailed to Applicant, Co. Assessor and the MN DNR
L R'Official/Date
bk 0407-001
329,512 - Victor Lundeen Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota
• -r-r..j..;•h ■I
•t -■I
SCALE DRAWING FORI\/|i II
H f CP(P(P 03 0‘i oc^a
Tax Parcel Number(s)
The scale drawing must be a signed drawing which includes and identifies a graphic scale (feet), all existing and/or proposed structures, septic
tanks, drainfields, lotlines, road right-of-ways, easements, OHWLs, wells, wetlands, topographic features (i.e. bluffs), and onsite impervious surface
calculations.
f
f
t I
%
Impervious Surface Ratio
(Must Complete Worksheet On Other Side)
Scale
I
!i
I I
!...
i Li...i.t.
■;
i ■■i
f- '
I
V
I
; -ii f
X.
\
4-
■ !
■ .......f
I
r
;
^I/t.i \A/e
1J.
1
r
1"1"
r
t T\Pro ..
^ ^ C
I ri .i. .i
i.i.T-
4.4-
f •-••rI
4 T'
;
r !-i--i-44:I!
tr '
i..I-!i"II.!‘
. f. I
f
i.. , I.,J 4 (■ ■ 4-
..i.
...............■i
f ..1.
!r .ri.t::r:iL
I
k-T
1"1 i.
Ir
h'I
.■4
I jr
1 J4-
□I
.L 1...4....4-
t-4 i.T -t
ItI
■f II
i ■ ■!.....i- 4 I 4-
T
■ ;
■[I!fI
. 4....I
4.I■t
-H7 fcr^.-
I
Q1
-4J i-4 T .[J-
J
■ tf —f-
-i.ii, .....^..■i
l ..1. l...4
t .4.i 4^..?..^.i fi.! i "I -t 4...i ....
• ■['■"4
t1..j..■Ii.;. .t'i
■ I r •4 fIi "rt 4.1 i!1[
f 4 4'■I-
... :..i.i 4-"T-11111 r'
I t!-ii .
T■i
trr 4-r-.J...-r ;tlh tii1RECEiVgt
-MW+rttlL
land & resource . ;
r4...+•..I.
ir 4.T
..i.f
r
I ,L.
41r
... .. , ... f. , .
...................' ' -r ‘ \ ! ■ 4
i '
I"!i1
o y II'; -1 ' iSignature of Property Owner Datir
BK —0909 $38,596 • Victc LundMn Co, Prinurs • F»fgu& J alls, MM * 1-800-34&4870.[.44
,?
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION WORKSHEET:
List of Onsite (Existing and Proposed) Impervious Surfaces fmust be shown on scale drawing):
1^10 R2Structure(s):
Ft2Deck(s):
^7(^Ft2Driveway(s):
I LpO Ft2Patio(s):
3C? f^2Sidewalk(s):
Ft2Stairway(s):
Ft2Retaining Wall(s):
Ft2Landscaping:
(Plastic Barrier)
Other:Ft2
"3- 7 ^ ^ Ft2TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:
I R2LOT AREA:
Q g y9-S~ y ^QQ - ^ y. ^ ^^ ^ -r I .%
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIOLOT AREATOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
■ , June 2,2011
Page # 4
Brian and Debora Brakke - Approved the variance as requested. (7:42 p.m.)
Brian and Debora Brakke, Lot 21 Block 4 Lida Shores, Lake Lida in Lida Township, requested the following: We
would like to change the pitch of the existing roofline from 4/12 pitch to 12/12 pitch, while replacing worn/old shingles
and rotten roof boards. We are requesting a variance for existing cabin, being 36' from the ordinary high water level,
placing the cabin in shore impact zone; required ordinary high water level setback is 75’ and the required shore
impact zone setback is 50'. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested.
After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a motion, second by Michael Harris and unanimously carried
to approve the variance as described in the application dated May 12, 2011 and as depicted on the drawing submitted
with the application. The variance as approved allows the applicants to change the roof line on the existing footprint
of the building (house). There will be no change to the existing footprint and the proposed development will not
negatively impact the neighboring properties.
Mike and Mona Johnson - Denied. (7:45 p, m.)
Mike and Mona Johnson, Lots 10 and 11 Meyers Second Addition, West McDonald Lake in Dora Township,
requested a variance of 10’ from the required top of bluff setback of 30’ for the placement of a garage 20’ from the top
of the bluff. Proposed garage will encroach the toe of bluff by approximately 10’. The applicants were represented by
Rob with Moore Engineering, Inc. and by Greg Nelson with Superior Lakeside. The audience was polled with no one
speaking for or against the variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Steve Schierer made a
motion, second by Michael Harris and carried with Thomas Lee voting no, to deny the variance as requested noting
that the previously approved variance does provide the applicants with a reasonable use their property and the
neighbor has indicated in a conversation with Randall Mann, Chair, stating that with the previously approve variance
he would still have access to his property/garage. The general opinion of the Board is that the previously approved
variance was thought to be the most reasonable location/site for the placement of a single stall garage. It was also
noted that not every property will support everything a property owner might desire.
Darwyn and Wendy Smith - Approved a variance from the ordinary high water level and denied the side lot
line variances as requested with a condition. (8:02 p.m.)
Darwyn and Wendy Smith, Lot 36 Robinson’s Addition, Clitherall Lake in Nidaros Township, requested a variance of
30’ from the required ordinary high water level setback of 100’ and variance of 3’ and 6’ from the required lot line
setback of 10’ for the placement of year round structure 70’ from the ordinary high water level, 7’ from the side lot line
on the southwest corner and 4’ from the side lot line on the northeast corner. A letter from Ruby Biederman opposing
the variance as requested was read for the record. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the
variance as requested. After discussion and consideration, Randall Mann made a motion, second by Thomas Lee
and unanimously carried, to approve the placement of a dwelling no closer to the ordinary high water level than the
dwelling to the east and to deny the side lot line setback variances as requested with the condition that the shed
currently located down by the lake and on the lot line must be placed in a location, as verbally agreed to by the
applicant, in a location that complies with the setback requirement of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. The
applicants’ property is a substandard lot of record. Note - the applicant can either remove and relocated the shed or
remove and replace with a new shed so long as the setback requirements of the ordinance are met.
Tom and Irene Yaeck - Approved the variance as requested with a condition. (8:14 p.m.)
Tom and Irene Yaeck, Lot 9 Sandy Haven Development, Stalker Lake In Tordenskjold Township, requested a
variance of 8’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a 30’ by 36’ detached garage 12’
from the road right-of-way. The audience was polled with no one speaking for or against the variance as requested.
After discussion and consideration, Paul Larson made a motion, second by,Steve Schierer and unanimously carried,
to approve a variance of 8’ from the required road right-of-way setback of 20’ for the placement of a 30’ by 36’
detached garage 12’ from the road right-of-way with the condition that no more than 25% of the total eligible lot area
can be covered with impervious surfaces. The variance as approved does not directly or indirectly grant any other
variances for the proposed development.
A feK T^ARwyh ani 5a\;-^W
: ._ At ^ C *7 h ^ fe:3
’'V&t' loo jt^et C OUf<lAr\y^ 't'i4<2.
U/^Te.R i A J^T‘ /-{>co >L^T (5
^y\S> Ut ocAjhs \ti\oLet^ H\ir^ ^ 0
Xt^- ^<3oh() T^o (^ivi^ ^
I V\ c?<^ Ojt ^CL
^ A\e ^ SA~av>X^
D'n /
cr| Too td T|u_ (xyiAi/
XSHjlAs
'TUva \ f 13i/( )cls tHo^edsl^
(^y<X,M^ AJ<AsI I h 'IftCri/C<L^e ^Ct Qycrt'
R^^Vy] j«4e|'t-^ c
Yarxv«,v4,^RHl/ t^v 0\\JL S K
__JLy^ 1 a a Hzju)U^.
ov'tcI ~f^ff-c
A> i^lA ^ ^
^ T^/\'^U)vK
u^^OJTav-^ c%vv^ ^
f
U)0^
S fn(T"fi TW^
v<M S'fii- oS2<t
\jUj uO^
^<4^ ..<5.
A)A)
/2011/THU 10:31 AM FAX No. 2185462393 P. 002
RECEIVED
MAY 1 2 2011
LAND & RESOURCEMay 12, 2011
Please add to my variance application the following measurements taken from my scale
drawing:
Distance from the property line on the southwest comer 7 feet.
Distance from the property line on the northeast comer 4 feet.
Distance from the lake to the structure 70 feet to be even with my neighbor on the east.
"Strxnriccre'^rzeTs^'SijyTChfeer
ftj/ttion fo
vfdnctnce Aff
Thank you
Darwyn Smith